what to convey to poroshenko well, you need to somehow pull them up to the choice. we were in sochi. he says, i ask you to tell him we don't need to fight. i will help says and restore the shattered. i'm happy. i think i’ll bring good news to petro poroshenko, i’ll come and tell him, listen, petro this is how it will help, and already there these billions have been identified and so on. this was a cool question for russia. his eyes lit up, but after a few days they went out. the americans quickly extinguished this look to them. that is, there were times when in general, this war would not have happened, but now we understand the statements of e merkel-lyolonde that they were gaining time. this is nonsense. they did not win any time, then everything was serious, and then they thought that they would win time. it is now that ukraine is fighting. it is opposing

the second army of the world to the aggressor, and so on. they were then in minsk. not for this. it's not popular right now. i did not want to show what heroes they are, they postponed this war of ours for seven years and gave ukraine the opportunity to arm itself beautifully. i didn't expect françual from merkit. well now oh, he's still alive. it's okay, but somehow it's okay , but merkel has positioned you all over the world as a strong personality and so on. why are you so small? did you sign next to some nasty people? this is again their question, therefore, yes to hcv. we'll discuss this, uh, but we 're not meeting at the hcv. we will meet with putin a day earlier. i called a few days

ago and suggested this algorithm approximately how he negotiated with the seat. we will discuss some of the issues that they are subject to discussion at the highest state council. well, the award is an appropriate decision that concerns hcv. well, you correctly emphasized the time lost, many people died. this disaster will pass time. we will still be alive and healthy and will be able to find the causes and investigative connections and appreciated this truth. thank you, dear alexander grigoryevich , deputy of the house of representatives of the national assembly gaidukevich oleg minsk before the question. i can't help but say i was very touched by your words to the only country. this is actually important about parties as well. you spoke correctly and criticized correctly,

i speak as the leader of the party. here they sit, different party leaders and leaders of public organizations. and everyone has a different program, but now it does not matter. i want the west to especially hear how we stood with you as a leader, and we will stand and defend this country. a question. i have such a speech of yours today about the family , it is very bold. in fact, not a single leader of europe will act like this. at best, he will remain silent or he will be torn apart for happiness. why not only fashionable? yes, alexandrovich is not that what is not fashionable, what is going on gay lesbians transsexuals, sex change 6 years children justify pedophilia bestiality came to this, and parents actually removed in some countries from raising children. i remember very well and the whole country how you defended a teacher who dared to make a remark to a student who insulted her

, and this suggests that in our country, in spite of the fact that we adopted the constitution , despite the fact that our society is really against this by torture to change this will continue for millions of dollars. here invest there. i want to ask you as president, how do you rate? that's what is happening in europe this is the destruction of civilization and our attempts and how can we still confrontation about gay lesbians or the proportion where to start? tell me. about alexandrovich’s parties, we will support you all the parties who stand side by side patriotically to the end correctly, despite the program, and now these programs do not matter and there is no difference between us and we have one program, as for the second part of the question, we have no live broadcast. probably even now. a i've already come here, as if not straight, well,

kohl agreed. sincerely. you probably noticed sergey that i'm not talking about these gay lesbians at all. what about lesbianism? this should not be in our society, i do not blame women in this regard. as for the men? well, it's disgusting to me. let not be offended. if someone is here, i will not

explain now, i do not want to offend anyone in this regard. why don't i talk about it? i say it again. girls, i take this blame on myself and on you, so we didn’t finish watching, so they start there. well, you know what kind of attitude we have enough of these people to joke, and i don’t even say, unfortunately or not in power. and when

they report this to me between the lines, i think i’ll take an interest in whether there are high-level people or in the government somewhere else, maybe its administration is there. that's right. i don’t know where these people are, uh, but they are there, i will instruct. report to me, give a description of what kind of people they are, how they work? god forbid the game does not work like they do. well, i sincerely tell you, there was not a single i checked not a single negative characteristic in different directions, but i think that they themselves did not defend their own there, which characteristics gave, i think, let me recheck, but this is my principle, in general, there have never been negative characteristics.

do you remember when you were young? was remember there was not. moreover, how it prospered, and no matter how they were expelled from the party, something else was different everywhere, they could not do anything. well , let's forbid these men to tumble with other men. well, to what it will lead to nothing, the more problems. we don't they create work well, but there should be no propaganda of these vile from the point of view, especially physical relations, in society. why the answer is very simple is even stronger than a single

man, as you know, did not give birth. therefore, this path is not acceptable to us. we need people, babies, men don't give birth, so let's stick to the classic, as i said subtly. classic family trend trends listen sergey they all applauded so loudly that i'm already starting to suspect you didn't seem, well, thank god, not everyone sergei so for detente you, and that is, i got to the microphone and still do not sit april 8 congress of the liberal democratic

party. i am not inviting you. i know you won't come why? but if they came, all the other parties worked three times better to come to them, but i went through another. today i sent a letter to the presidential administration asking you to allow the liberal democratic party to be renamed supplement. rather, its name is 30 years. we in the ninety-fourth year were created by my father. she was called the liberal-democratic party is simple, but the whole world they know the whole of belarus as a liberal democratic party, belarus , and we would very much ask you to allow us. we will never shame. we will always defend the country so that we can be called the liberal democratic party of belarus because this is the country where we will always work and defend its interests. i don't mind, thank you very much. i will not come to the congress because it is a liberal-democratic party. just when before re-registration. uh,

a certain algorithm of the president's actions was developed. eh, experts, as always, consulted offered me e. well, i can, all the same, i won’t stay in the party and didn’t need to, well, communists, liberals are a white stream. i would also definitely visit these large associations, i think, well, you won’t come to the kids yet to be offended for the president, but all the children have the same fingers on one hand, so we developed such an algorithm, when you shake everything, parties form during registration and we have me let's gather in such a hall, if you want, we can reduce it. i think less and discuss some of the problems of party building already with the leaders and leadership of the party. this was the algorithm, so i was not present and the belarusians, uh, or whatever you call them now? well, it probably won't be right if i come to the liberal democrats, but i didn't. eh, to white

russia, so here he sits. he tortured me afterwards. in general, he will fight against me in the elections. why do i need these problems? no? i did not say that i would nominate myself as president in the elections. no, i'm just saying that why do we need equal relationship. i don't want there to be inequality. i do not want there to be a party in power and someone on the sidelines on the side. no, god forbid that everyone be in the party, such as sergei gaidukevich, i don’t need anything else in all parties, so we will meet again on the party’s platform. hello , dear alexander grigoryevich, dean of the faculty of journalism of the belarusian state university alexei belyaev alexei you have been working for a long time, and i could not

congratulate you as a dean for a little over a month and a half. congratulations on this heavy clamp, but heavier than yours. that's obvious. no. well, no, do not envy , there is nothing good in this, but i really hope that you will be able to create a team of worthy people around you and yet we will get real fighters of journalists from there. that's how, which we have today, fortunately after the twentieth year, this is a role model, and then i asked that our main protagonist in journalism. well, how is it? and the others, uh, were still in some kind of supervisory council there and helped , uh, you work, work out the appropriate practice, build up, because the poet we have is not just a poet to journalists more that's just about this we are to you. in fact , the supervisory board was created at

the faculty of journalism for advice. we have already held, just two meetings are working closely. eh, and that's in connection with your message. i would like to ask. today you have covered a very large scale both in terms of time and volume, and in terms of the issues that your message touched upon on a very large scale. that's exactly the hardest thing about the war now, unfortunately, as you often repeat, we are completely here for you we understand military time, but in the introduction you spoke mainly about the war in the truest sense of the word, which was extremely sad about the economic war about the economic sanctions that fell on us, but i understand that due to lack of time, probably very casually touched upon the problems of the information war, but in fact , it is the information war that is the most

large-scale today, because e and print media, newspapers and audiovisual mixers, the vision of radio and especially digital platforms. today. this is truly a real battlefield. and there now various kinds of clumsy fakes are multiplying, which even a non-professional will immediately see and distinguish, but at the same time , so-called diffrics also appear, that is, very high-quality fakes or a high-quality spoon, which even professionals are sometimes very difficult. plus , the information field is available today. unfortunately for everyone, here is any person with a smartphone. today, he fancies himself a journalist trying to make some kind of recording, photography , video reposts. e, while absolutely not understanding sometimes what it produces for information product, but we see that in

any war. ek- to our, probably, happiness, yes, after all, uh, an important point, these are fighters. yes, you just said about our journalists, fighters of the information front. everything can fail and technology. today he was paid attention, although good, but enemy and your criticism could not stand it, but just the question is in the fighters of the information front those very journalists and since you yourself pay attention to it. here it is, in your opinion. this is the topic of young journalists who must today. to replace our dear meters, andrey nikolayevich flourist and all our wonderful heavyweights and vadim frantsevich gigin and the leaders of all our largest media, whose media you here, you constantly see, spoke before me, but they are being replaced by people who even now, maybe, and did not survive those problems

of the twentieth year. they were still young then , they came later. here. er, what advice would you give them first. what qualities do they need to develop for themselves and what instructions would you specifically give us what we should pay attention to when training these fighters technical equipment, or, as you correctly said today, patriotism, because only patriotism can make a person a person, and educate a patriot. maybe only the patriot is paying attention to what we are paying attention to, what should we, uh, focus on setting up this one of ours. you put on a young shift. thank you, of course, there should be a technique, but a certain technique will not help you. if, as you said correctly , there will not be these real fighters. that's it, just do as i do, this is my principle, journalists often talk about this, that lukashenka acts according to principle. here i showed you. do as i do in

this regard, of course, and hygiene for him who she, whom the wound is written off. they will still show themselves. well, let them do what they do. we now have a whole galaxy of new journalists who have opened real sensible ones for different tastes. they are different. take ksyusha lebedeva there as an illumination, who has the same chic and take hygiene, and sergey gaidukevich, they are all different, a whole palette of people and the main thing for them is to watch not only these gadgets, but also tv. and we must not miss them, really this word know me recently. a person lives

outside of our country and being there in some kind of relative vacuum. yes, there on youtube he watches something there and so on telegram channels, but still it’s not that our man lives in belarus. i mean, the real belarusian owns. uh, owns for belorus and view from the outside. well, like vladimir ilyich in his time, lenin was? remember the advice of an outsider, if you don’t have a hygiene ask, he definitely remembers uh, the advice of an outsider vladimir ilyich lenin like this and here uh, from the outside he looked like once on the topic of the media and with such heartache, he writes about where we do not finalize something. i read it carefully on five pages this morning. and

he instructed the appropriate people to print all this. and send it to the people who are responsible for it. he walked through the chiefs, all over all, and pointed out the shortcoming. in order not to delay your attention, we will send you this document. if we send, then we will present the opportunity to familiarize ourselves with it, so as not to decipher the source. we say, say, often special services and you will see how a person, uh, looks at our information field, therefore , those aksakals who we have today are still alive and healthy for a long time. god forbid that we need to learn to live, uh, but we need replenishment. sooner or later, these people leave and your children.