and about where we are not finalizing something. i read it carefully on five pages this morning. and instructed the appropriate people to print it all. and send it to the people who are responsible for it. he walked through the bosses, all over all, and pointed out the shortcomings. in order not to delay your attention, we will send you this document. if we send, then we will present the opportunity to familiarize ourselves with it, so as not to decipher the source. we say, they say, often the special services will see him as a person, uh, look at our information field, therefore those aksakals who are still alive and healthy in our country for a long time to come. god forbid that we need to learn to live, but we need replenishment. sooner or later, these people leave and your children

, whom you will raise there together with markov and ace, there and others they must come to this place, but they must undergo combat coordination and training speaking, today, in this language. it has to be done, and you know what to do if, uh, i have to be there, and i planned. this is waiting for you. yes, i'll come, we'll talk more specifically about fakes and de fake and so on. uh, but most importantly, you are now journalists political scientists. e people. so i know all of you, i am closely following there from this club of editors and ending with other author's programs. you are great. you are sincerely struggling. e for my country for our belarus e, so i am very grateful to you and let them learn from you and you

have come to us now. now comes the acute phase of the information war. this is no longer opposition, not confrontation. this is war. which is unleashed including against us we have learned to fight. we have learned counterattack. we have learned how to create certain occasions and other inform as you call it. information occasions yes , the operation is carried out and the operation has already been learned to carry out. uh. and here is our conversation today. you, you look and will and support and will scream and squeal , they will already be there in their resources supposedly for their own and others, don’t look, don’t look at lukashenka. and how will you fight with lukashenka, if you do not look, and they do not

look at me. and it will be informational occasions, a bunch, now they will rinse us, uh, from feet to heads and so on, but i don't think we have anything to take here. therefore, we cannot lose this war; we will lose this information war. you know, let's plunge into the real war. we won't lose it anytime soon . we will additionally take appropriate measures to strengthen our propaganda and agitation. and i don't even want to give it up. yes, we will promote better campaigning. we will be for the best. we understand it this way, and not the way they understand it, although, they are the most brainless propagandists without brains. if there were brains, they would somehow promoted and agitated what they consider to be the best. more efficient thank you

very much. good afternoon, comrade president yuryevich yuri voskresensky before asking a question, i would like to thank you on behalf of the entire audience, on behalf of the entire belarusian people, for your dedication despite the extreme geopolitical conditions. we preserved our independence , state sovereignty and did not allow belarus to be drawn into the hot stage of hostilities . thank you for that. we talked about the ratings that western partners are now poking us with 80% 3%, 90% zelensky himself

are called and we know how they are drawn. try. say that you are against the war, so we don't need about eighty percent of nuclear weapons against the war. this is our protectors. now the question is related to the difficult belarusian-polish relations in the context of the fact that this is our one of the main neighbors , with whom there could be good trade and educational exchanges. and in general , it hurts to watch how the polish regime of the dudemarovian kaczynski is now mocking his e, hardworking polish people by closing all border crossings and borders. so here it is uh, being a member of the commission created by your order upon return. e. hmm

, polish diplomats came to me as fugitives. yes, they come out all the time. uh, representatives of the polish government with a proposal. as they call the revival about some kind of exchange, the conclusion of a belarusian citizen who is with us and many do not know this , a polish citizen for some other conditions. please tell me how and if it's possible generally reach with the polish side under the current leaders to some normal level of interaction and a second small literally in addition? do i understand correctly, having heard

from your words, that the order that our commission can deal not only with external, but also with internal internal issues. do i understand correctly that this commission for returning people home can also consider some situations from people, uh, who are in belarus and, according to their assumptions, for example, were unfair offended or fired. thanks a lot. you correctly understood that it makes no sense for us to deal with e. uh, in some other authorities with these issues. i think it will. great, if the commission i call the commission of the swede, uh, will deal with these issues. why not? approaches are the same, only those fled, and these remained here. i think this small will be a small appendage to

your work. and this needs to be done. if you need to connect. you connect me to these questions. but i think you can handle yourself as far as your work is concerned. e s polish representation. eh, they give me yours. uh, the remarks that you sometimes u sent to me. i definitely read and react to them, you know that, and i support them. eh, yours. e your work with the polish representation in these thank you yes in these representative. i see it on other channels as well. uh, some changes, first of all, with him. well, he's here i wish he sees our position , our policy. i know how this position is changing for these people, as far as the exchange is concerned. here personally, as a person. i do not accept it, but i did not invent it. you know that

intelligence agencies, uh, and then they take it to a high level. uh, the level of the president without the approval of the president, there are no exchanges. you know that the russians, in my opinion, yaroshenko recently exchanged this, uh, pilot for some kind of woman there, it seems, who was in russia with drugs, yes , a basketball player is easier, well, he didn’t come up with that, so like a person from power. i am compelled with these accounts. and now they recently, in my opinion, even a public blurted out there, someone at the level of deputy ministers of the country is doing someone more, what they offer us once said the last name this. for some reason or for some reason, but exchanged for some piece of the border? on the beaver forest there is still, uh, this checkpoint. ugh, when they told me, uh, i was generally terrified for a long time. how can a person be exchanged for a

checkpoint. well, you don’t need to close this item well. i don't think he works for us anymore. well, you don't want to. i’m saying that we practically don’t go there for the purposes of the economy and some state interests. but hmm exchange something to exchange. i can be public today. i haven't ordered this yet. uh, in our relevant authorities and you did not talk about it. well, i will say publicly if they want honor or cancel it for some reason. uh, uh, something. well, we have more traps. but to change the sucker, as if alone, when i never agree with him all.