they recently broke such a sum there , the government reported to me the sources of funding, if the youth and the belarusian republican youth union and you join this. i will be very happy to announce this construction site as a youth construction site, especially since you did not let us down in khatyn. well, here, uh, we will do our best to help, dear friends. i think this conversation was very helpful. uh, so i earnestly ask those who heard me today and those who want, after all, our sovereignty and independence to act in this vein so that we do not have to spur each other on, therefore, we will do our best to implement the plans that we have outlined. whatever it takes for us. we need to go through this difficult period without losing anything. and this year, i already said in hattin, if we can’t move further than last year, but we need to maintain

the level of last year, but i already feel from the first quarter that we have the opportunity, first of all, to add to the economy and we must add . i beg you. let's take care of our country there will be an economy no missiles no armed terrorists and so on we are not afraid. give me that economy. it's up to you, everything else. i will decide for myself. thank you for meeting today.

hello editors' club at belarus 1 and belarus 24 we will discuss the most interesting topics of the past seven days and not only introduce the guests who today came to our studio at makarenko nine in studio 600 in order to discuss these topics dmitry alexandrovich zhuk the head of the holding sb belarus today marat markov and the chairman of the board of cjsc the second national tv channel oleg gaidukevich. mp party leader yuriy voskresensky head of the round has become a democratic force and into one. uh, head of the knowledge society, good evening . hmm. i guess we're on friday. we are now writing programs in the evening, probably, it will be highlighted at night, if we go out, uh, on the air. uh, but the repeat is always on sunday. e in the morning, so good night. and good morning. well, that's television. what are you going to do, well, well, the main topic of the outgoing week is clearly the message of the president to the belarusian parliament and the people to that

the time when the majority of viewers will be watching our program. of course, there will already be a lot of materials on this topic and in print on dmitry alexandrovich yes , you will be printing all night tonight. he’s not enough bands there, probably, to discuss what the additional ones have closed today, what the president has touched on today and, of course, there will be a lot on tv and radio for four and a half hours, communication with the president lasted. oh yes, forgive alexander serkovich. i know how he feels about it. well, for example, i'm on one breathing. it's so wonderful to me. uh, it was a great performance, sergeyevich and i sat next to each other and dmitry savich discussed it, of course, this alignment for 30 minutes, in my opinion, 40 in ukraine, yes, the reason is a hereditary connection. uh, for what reason did the tragedy happen to our neighboring countries, what contributed to this and what will happen next uh, full alignment? here i myself speak to groups , including students, i try to explain this, so you can take this speech, probably already the mother of some formats

and just let it be read. let's watch visualize for clarity. so is also to blame for the fact that u happened there, but then uh, the conditions were stretched throughout the performance. i repeat once again, national unity of historical memory, our traditions, economy, social justice , independent foreign policy, defense ability. now, on the move, he analyzes just that. having arrived from the palace of the republic, i look at ukraine like this. and much of this is already gone. in this side. maybe that's why what happened happened. well, let's go. here's what. well, of course everyone is talking about it. everyone is talking about it, everyone wanted to hear from the president. it is i who would like to congratulate our neighbors lithuania latvia poland ukraine for the fact that he has always raised their status in the international arena in them. they became nuclear neighbors. ah, powers.

of course, i'm joking a little, because there are no nuclear weapons in our country yet, but it will inevitably e . everyone was interested in topics. so it will be a weapon, a new weapon will be russian. what my relationship will be and have it. god forbid well, let's not say the use of control of these weapons. uh, the president said that the most direct thing is a weapon. mm, which is located on the territory of our country is controlled by the supreme commander of the republic of belarus, we received all the answers in this island question, look here, after all, he began as the head of the society, the president of knowledge emphasized several times that he is a lecturer this is how he shot this conversation, er he, at first it was evident that in a good high spirits in fact and joked and very many important. he said serious things, and uh, he owned not only the attention of the audience, i think, but it was

important to him. at this moment, when everything in the world is electrified, to present this information precisely as a competent, experienced lecturer in order, well, you know, not to nightmare people somewhere. this is what it looked like too. this is a very important point. and i think he has this feeling. remember how he started that you relax. and i am everything to you let me tell you, this one is important. uh, moment here. uh , regarding nuclear weapons, they also worked. this has already become a corporate identity, our opponents can not figure it out in any way. yes. eh, when do we take a break? it is even contrary to many textbooks. we give them to opponents. let's call them that, yes, that's just all the nonsense that they can spread , tell all the nonsense that is possible, and then clear, verified assessments, what else is important directly? and, in the course of the president’s speech , comments went up and they knew that there would be more next week, and the supreme state council where the accents will also be placed not only on

nuclear weapons, but also on ukraine , you just asked a question about this. yes, but i would also like to say this about the nuclear status, after all, let's be precise , we are becoming a threshold state, that is, after all, we do not violate the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, because if we became fully nuclear weapons we would not transfer as threshold the most curious comments that come from nato analysts and near-nato they are asked, they say, yes, that's all, this is a violation, belarus russia, they went there incorrectly. and what do you know? we cannot say, as we say, here in germany there is a large state, which also mentioned to the president that american nuclear weapons are located, who will make the decision, the americans or the germans. they? well, we can’t reveal it to the end, but in belarus it’s definitely wrong, that is, not just double standards, but it’s uh, to deprive other countries of sovereignty, it’s transparent here, more than ever, read documents about

allied state, read our allied military doctrine. listen to the statement of the two supreme commanders and everything is clear and clear with us, as it will be. well, not only to be used and controlled, i drew attention to a very important point of attention. that's not even starting yet about nuclear weapons. why, in fact, the whole of europe should rejoice, what if a president is? he is honest and outspoken. so, when i’m listening to the leaders of europe now, let’s take, germany france in general, that he carries an incomprehensible damper , it’s unclear what he will do tomorrow incomprehensibly, that is, they say, one thing does another. the next day, the third speak and they have such direct communication with the european leader. these are common words. we are for peace, we are specifically for democracy. what does lukashenka lay out? uh, that means everything is on the shelves , like dominoes, everything is understandable, but there is. plus for them they do not understand this, maybe fools. he says the truth is easier to build relationships with us. we say what we do, this

force of belarus is now about nuclear weapons. well, when in europe, uh, some voices are heard, that we are violating some kind of international law there, but this is complete nonsense a long time ago, tactical nuclear weapons are standing all over europe, moreover, one frenchman is right, but i will specify that these nuclear weapons will be used by decree in washington in the way it should and in this is a risk to the entire planet. why are we worried? when are the poles doing militarization on the border now? why is he worried, or what? yours is again not a sovereign country, what can be expected from them? with whom to negotiate. here's how the president correctly said today they don't give zelensky negotiate. so the same applies to the president of lithuania and even more so to the president of poland duda. he himself can not do anything in this trouble and this is the danger for europe because if they could themselves they would think about their national ones. about the world, and so they follow, with interest, if i may, i’ll completely add there is an interesting case of turkey, these ones, but with these

puppets, the germans and everyone else, it’s clear that turkey has tactical weapons and a lot in figs, when erdogan began to pursue an independent policy, americans began to speak, listen, come on. we will take away these weapons, and they should have been told in turkey no-no-no, they say, wait. wait a minute, where are you going? why hurry no? no, he has no right not to give it away, but they began to hint and now the question of turkey is a nuclear power, yes or no, the second one is still not in germany but in turkey, how will the decision on the use of weapons be applied in the next turkey is a belligerent state turkish armed forces are the strongest in nato after for the moment after the united states they are uh, constantly they are fighting in syria in iraq, they are conducting military operations, and this is a country that has nuclear weapons on its territory, therefore. and they will study their case. but the most interesting thing about the turkish issue is that international scholars and lawyers do not have a unanimous opinion, but we

are reproached. naturally, this weapon will be placed with us. i'll just remind viewers. although. i am sure that most of them will become mihajlovičičić, not deployed, and the president focused on this. and why is it returned? excuse me, interrupting pressure, we were forced, but because what we were promised was not fulfilled. that's all. that is, this is the reason for the investigative connection, about what he spoke, vladimir of france still explained, but i would like to say something completely different. nuclear weapons from this issue is very important , it will be discussed and that's it. it's clear. i would like to say in another i saw the leader of the nation who knows what to do and sees the goal and the goal is very understandable to ensure a peaceful life and development of our state. this is what i saw in all these six components, which provide sovereignty

in relation to security, including nuclear weapons, which will be delivered to us, if you listened carefully to this, the president spoke not only about tactical, but also about strategic weapons. yes, and about those mines from poplars that have remained preserved here. and we know that lukashenka just doesn't talk about anything so easily. this is also a reason to think our neighbors say. so. well, what was important for me was that at the head of this message was such a concept as sovereignty and independence and everything that the president spoke about. this is in the name of ensuring the safety of our sovereignty, of course, the story of nuclear weapons is only and part of the big one big story is the preservation of e, sovereignty and independence, i want to say again that i will remind the audience that the west reproaches that we we are trying to host tactical nuclear weapons for the time being, although at the moment, uh, 150 units of tactical american nuclear weapons are located on the territory of europe and 250 aircraft. are you ready

for them to use these missiles in belgium germany italy the netherlands and turkey about which reminisced about water rights, such as the president's test tube. e, which is connected with the battle, this is a very important indicator, because we are now almost this week or 2 weeks ago celebrating a sad date, 20 years from the moment. we discussed it, and now the president spoke about this today, that no one answered this, not a single person answered for this , millions died and anyway gas and organization of the united nations, which the president remembered today, who else, maybe we will touch on it speaker. well, firstly, we didn’t just sit on this message , and we didn’t just enjoy what we heard, and i’ll be honest, i can even show on my phone in my notebook exactly all the points that the president said, here six points, and with

certain theses, which it was necessary not only to listen to, but also to feel. uh, i will say that the most important thing is that today we received answers for ourselves first of all, well di france don't know how important it is to feel the nuances when you walk in the audience. and when you go to people, you start to retell, yes or explain some things that, in general, the president is quite clear today. he outlined the issues that were raised. yes, most of all, probably, the topic of nuclear weapons was the most worrying, be that as it may, it is very much connected with what is happening in ukraine, no matter how important it may be. uh, remember iraq yes, indeed, when you will then he made a statement about this test tube of pavel. but then i am absolutely sure that if there really were chemical and bacteriological weapons in iraq, yes , chemical weapons in the first place, as uh threatened, bush would hardly have american troops, they would go there at all if there were weapons

of mass destruction there in this territory. they would never risk it. i just want to emphasize this in order to draw some parallels. there is one small nuance that, uh, should also be remembered. the germans. yes indeed at five countries in five european countries. e placed approximately 20 e of nuclear bombs. uh, 61, yes, uh, the power of this is 18 megatons and i remind you that just in case, this is uh many times more than what fell on hiroshima or nagasaki each, but in turkey the sixth country posted 50 of the same , yes, the biggest arsenal and the most interesting thing is really when the troubles started with the tour. uh, the americans started negotiations with warsaw from romania for a second and there is no exact information about whether there were any number of nuclear bombs in romania or not? here on today will answer this question. i do not take it exactly and no one will answer, because , uh, as the military experts say. most

importantly, if you want to know if a nuclear tactical weapon is stored in some territory. and you see if there are aircraft, uh, that are capable of carrying it. now , if they suddenly start to appear there from an inappropriate place and are based on airfields , there is a very high probability that this country begins to participate in the nuclear program and become nato's nuclear umbrella. well, as for belarus, you know, really, a lot of cries appeared around this, even our former inmates. i won't name names, uh, unpleasant surnames. frankly speaking, in the tenth year, those who had been lit up, then they began to say that belarus automatically became a target after let's say it straight, yes, after it becomes a target, after it deploys nuclear weapons. not all of them say so, they can still speak, this is nonsense and nonsense

completely outright. first, none a country that possessed or was the custodian of nuclear weapons, not a single country has been subjected to aggression in the entire history. uh-huh this is the first very important point, secondly, let's look at our dear burghers, yes germany in the twenty -first year there was a very strong anti-war movement aimed at removing all nuclear weapons by the age of 21, all nuclear weapons from the territory of germany at twenty the second year, when it began with its own, the number of the population increased three times in surveys, which is the number of the population that e spoke in favor of keeping nuclear weapons and added another 15% who said that their number should be increased. yeah, and upgrade in order to ensure the security of the state. if we don't trust ourselves, if we don't trust the president, okay? take this experience, if you have such doubts

, but the fact is that let's talk straight, if i have an iron club in my hands, i am much stronger than if i have it in my hands, just my hands when i am attacked by aggression, uh-huh and the aggressor is to teach. well i would like to pay attention to those the figures that the president announced, because our western well-wishers, so to speak, already. they bite with completely fake statistics, they say that they say 80% are against the deployment of arsenals. well, to which i personally said in my question to the president that 80% are against war, and even 100 and even 100, but this is really our insurance and correctly cited sergeyevich, i’m glad that history has proven that where nuclear weapons are located, you know countries attack were not committed, it is 100 years old for us. don't , tether the president of belarus repeatedly invites the west to stop this militarization, this conflict, and then

there will be no weapons. it will go to storage areas. remove sanctions. get out of the war in ukraine restore normal economic relations. uh, back to normal civilized politics. that's all they caught. how many times the united states dreamed of attacking. now i will give an example. well, i wanted to try it now, we will definitely listen to the head of state about nuclear weapons. we have how fate is decided. uh, a million people, a fate big enough countries, so that you understand about the same scenario was drawn and the republic of belarus today, the president announced the data that were received from the belarusian intelligence, and there are plans for an attack on the territory of our country and even from one of the american units now i don’t remember. first division. by the way, she is now being transferred to eastern europe that they are ready to seize the main strategic facilities in our country, so that you understand this is

professionals who have long dismantled all uh, strategic uh, building structures ministries of departments, including our company, are sure to capture it and, in case of a team, are ready to invade and destroy us and put their leadership here. that is , do you think that these are jokes, listen to what wesley clark tells him. remind him , he is the commander during the operation in the balkans . yes, i don't remember. in what position did he simply retire , this already middle-aged man somehow went to the pentagon let's listen. i went to the pentagon just after the 9/11 days. through 10 met with the head of the pentagon rumsfeld and his deputy with whom he worked and one of them says, sir, stop by for a minute, we need to chat. i can’t do that now, but he does, we decided to fight iraq here. it was around september 20th. i told him what, and why, but

he, i have no idea there are options. the show unearthed ties to adam salka, but he didn't, nothing like that. we just decided to go to iraq , we don’t know what to do as terrorists, but we have a cool army, and it is capable of overthrowing regimes , our only tool is a hammer, so any problem should look like a nail. in a few weeks. we met again, by that time we had already bombed afghanistan. i told him that there in iraq. we still want to fight him. and yes, he would take a piece of paper from the table and say, they just let me down from above , it says here that we need to turn seven countries in 5 years, we will start with iraq and then we will go according to plan and with a lid, iranian

information that's how the countries are decided, listed everything came true. iran was not attacked with nuclear weapons there is the same thing and they do not attack us, because they are afraid that the president will lose today about this and they receive bets. there are urgent negotiations with russian president putin on the return of nuclear weapons to belarus precisely on the return of nuclear weapons, which were withdrawn in the nineties then under the guarantee of no sanctions against those who revealed no pressure, no

planning of an offensive and the revolution, everything was trampled, everything was violated. i have the right to raise questions about the return of nuclear weapons, which the madmen signed before me obligation to return it. i remember when they pressed me. i just stopped this conclusion, i did not begin to withdraw weapons in 1995. i was subjected to the most severe pressure not only from the west, but from the president of russia. i said, no, i will not withdraw. and as i remember now, he tells me, but you understand, crush destroy, yes, and you will not be able to serve strategic warheads. do you remember then the most modern weapons were in service here. poplars, which even now in the russian federation i do not i'm trying to intimidate or

blackmail someone, i'm talking about it again and again. the lord is with him. i want to secure the belarusian state and ensure peace for the belarusian people with my history with my whole existence. my people deserved this under the whip, we don’t want to live anymore and we won’t be slaves. well, i hope that the hot head will cool. here is a decision to the lawyer is planned, when the vault is built, it will be done this part of what we are discussing now. here is the thesis. uh, the terms of the sovereignty of independence said what? there one moment was so important, the infrastructure is all ready regarding the storage. i think, well , it's good that they are ready, and it's good that you heard this is the head of state. he did say. uh, there's a discussion of slippage, some. yes, it is said about him by the russian federation on the territory of ukraine that they paid little attention to weaker less powerful weapons. and we are just

fine with this issue. we are undergoing modernization and the most modern, one of the best weapons in the world. we have, but another very important topic, oh which was affected by the president and now you are defranchised. hmm, how to go to our studio on the air out? yes, they certainly asked about the peace initiative, about what should sit down at the negotiating table, which one? in the russian federation, no, no sergey karnaukhov, yes , solovyov life was, but rather they asked about the general atmosphere. is it really possible for both sides to sit down at the negotiating table now, dmitry peskov commented without any conditions uh-huh and i will say this. uh, he said it would be discussed between the two presidents at the same time. that's important stress in ukraine nothing has changed from its will continue. i think, firstly, we must understand that alexander lukashenko continues the line that he has been leading since the fourteenth year. naturally, the president in our region is the only country in our region that stands for peace today. well, and the audience on february 24th. it all started on 26.

uh, somewhere there was already the first statement of alexander lukashenko about the need for negotiations. that is, they literally started right away, we did everything for this and continue to do it for the president. this is such a deep a wound on the heart is what is happening alexander lukashenko fighting in ukraine perceives as a civil war the war inside our home common to russian belarusians and ukrainians, what he actually said, and he makes an attempt. uh, prevent further escalation, realizing, as he said, that in general, it is almost inevitable that the counteroffensive that the west is preparing and we see the ukrainians. they don't even really want to start seeing it. what force the russians are concentrated on the other side, the army is also waiting for it, it is very seriously pumped up there. and if you look even what he said. uh, vladimir putin and this is confirmed by objective data , the russians will make one battalion set

of tanks. that's 31 tanks a week. they have reached levels of tank production not seen there since 1991. plus, tornados are coming with the latest weapon systems. they operate factories in three shifts. we see it all. e, and. but it's the new sacrifice the president is calling for. let's come to our senses, come to our senses, we are ready for this. to do everything, but at the same time , we emphasized during our dialogue. first zelensky his team is not completely independent. we remember how it was in march, they pulled the bidens with johnson and it was all over. that is , he simply will not be allowed to do it. the second moment is the west and many have heard the statement of blinkin and others without a pendulum and what political steps? they are waiting for his exodus. the third very important factor. this is the west's reaction to the peace plan. china again scoff bullying ignoring. well, you know , i can predict what they will say now. uh, what memes will they use, what is putin

asked lukashenka to voice it, because russia is exhausted, she has no strength. she cannot continue fighting. nonsense, the fugitives launched the thesis, as always they returned the knowledge of all that's all all the president's words and launched the thesis that the president wants to distance himself from russia or yes , they have water from the same ones. and they will exaggerate plus. if there somewhere these all liars will get out. they will test again. here are the president's words about peace for me. uh, they mean what kind of thing, firstly lukashenka he has not changed his position since the age of 14, he has always not only spoken in words from america like these european leaders. they all listen to everything, supposedly fighting for peace, he does for the world. it's all about the difference. he does not say he does, but at the same time, so that it does not happen. at least in some ways this is the first thesis, the second. we will never turn our backs on our ally the russian federation so that there are these hotheads who, uh, as always, they hear and

understand everything what they are talking about, but the third president speaks the truth, offers a real mechanism, the only one that can bring a few things in the first place. uh, curious comment from the president about the fact that hmm ukraine probably has no chance during this contact offensive, russia cannot lose, in principle, because putin announced what will happen if she starts to lose. there will be the use of the most terrible weapons in this way. probably , i think that the west understands this, they just want to sit down at the negotiating table in this way. anyway, in the end, putin only on the terms, probably, of the west, but i would also i don’t know if magara pay attention to this or not? i would have turned to them in their place. this will be their big big pain. here are those who will hear these words of the president. who hasn't heard yet, did you notice that the president said that he had a lot of contacts with people. uh, with uh from western influential circles. i'd just like to say, if you are respected and disrespected and mostly not respected

fugitives who are uh, doing terrorism around here. especially extremism. uh, bullying and so on. if you think that the strangeness of the west told you that in the twentieth year that you will never communicate and do not communicate, then you do not understand anything at all about what is happening. we have if you i suspect if you knew it would be bad , you would have had a tantrum with sveta and pasha and france with the international commission , so that the audience would also know, by confirming the words of the president, the contacts of the international commission of the parliament with western parliaments , as they were, and not only with those. who supports the svyaznoy between official minsk and official poland i think why the fugitive react like that when voskresensky appears on the territory of poland. they understand that he didn’t come there just like a church. and krakow look performs some important. well, i, when your wards, so to speak, e mind will be typed already yuriy it seems to me, because

they did not come out of the political sphere. they are representatives of the so-called this creative creativity. that's e classes, so they will step on the rake up infinity, but i can really confirm that only in the last 2 years i have only with representatives of the polish e, that is, the ment, yes, and polish diplomacy had 17 meetings with a doctor. eh, fugitives, including that these meetings were all with top officials, embassies, and, let's say , there were five meetings with the americans. so it's just me. imagine what kind of contacts our foreign ministry has with the president and other relevant structures. well, you know, colleagues, i was deeply hurt today by the number of dead in iran announced by president lukashenko 500.000 people. this, of course, is a colossal figure on both sides of this military conflict. this is a tragedy for hundreds

of thousands of people. i'm thinking all the time. here. is it the green bearded one? excuse me, ivan mikhailovich, the bastard could not zelensky , i mean, i could not sit down to get a pen out of my pocket to sign any peace for any change, although it is obvious that a lot was said in our programs, starting. i don’t know why i’m sitting here, probably, from the year 18 ukraine would have remained within its borders. definitely the president today. he said that if there was a conversation, then about crimea, about the return of crimea, maybe about a special status. you understand the full extent of the cynicism and crime of the americans and the current and poroshenko of the current regime. poroshenko, after all , putin for 8 years or how many persuaded him to leave ukraine in the current border, we sat in this court, i apologize, before the start of a special operation. i remember very well and discussed everything that is happening with ukraine for 14 years. it's their

policy's fault. first of all. even the external factor is secondary. if there are fools specific is the same you say in the description, so you signed the same in kiev about that or a pre- contract. yes, they were criticized in russian society. first, we had two rounds near gomel well, in the woodlands, then belovezhskaya pushcha, then they approved it in istanbul, and the mutual understanding of the hand of steel stopped. compresses at the second meeting we will open this. it means that they even drank a veil of cognac, if the first meeting was very hostile between the two sides, then the second one took place already, well, according to normal diplomatic canons, the result. you remember one of the members of the ukrainian delegation. killed banker, then he was then it turned out that this was some kind of enmity between the two e, special services and then just under direct pressure. johnson came to the west and walked around kiev and kiev refused to participate in any negotiations. you know one nuance, let's emphasize what i was too embarrassed to say with uh for some reason. here is a very interesting message in response to the question. which yura asked for

the event. yes, the fucker today voiced an interesting project proposal to send our polish neighbors bumper chic barter. you want respect. yes, no question to the border changing boundaries. yes, but for the leadership of sciences, please, ready with all the men in exchange for hmm, do you know why? because i didn't get out. the thing is, no one will listen to him. no one will consider his opinion as soon as the polish side considers that it is beneficial to it. she will immediately send this government here in exchange for her citizen, right away this is a very important point , yes, because i, uh, excuse me, i'm not talking about as they say, not the oracle yes, but i'm sure that this will happen, it's only a matter of time said what the lohushka had already answered from

suggested some kind of proposal, the polish authorities decide. yes, not a lady, not tikhanovskaya, no exchange will be decided, the polish authorities have one point that is important to emphasize you so seriously. say yes, i will just finish, uh, that it is important to emphasize the words of the president is a very important point. when he spoke a lot today, he talked about peace initiatives from the very beginning. yes, but he also emphasized the nuance that needs to be voiced again, and to be heard. here is a personal pain for him, as well as for everyone sitting. here. i'm sure what the nationalists are really fighting are ideological opponents. the nazis, in fact, yes, for the most part, they have already been destroyed and now they are throwing losses into the furnace, in fact, ordinary citizens are ordinary people, most of them slavs , most of them russians, yes, who live

on the territory of ukraine and who are orthodox, on which now there is a persecution of faith by and large, and now they are like expendable material solely so that he emphasizes several times they are not they need this war, they don't need this war. it is needed only by those who supply weapons and force these people to fight, in fact. this is a civil war and i absolutely agree with that. look, this is exactly what i wanted to say. hmm, marat sergeevich, which is an indispensable value for the president. this is human life. he, when he spoke about the counter, comes there. yes, he what he was talking about, only that nothing will change, in addition, what puts e hammered. no, and maybe thousands of human lives and no one gives a damn, but the worst thing is that they don’t give a damn about it the current ukrainian government. and here it is very important for us to see that the line that our president is pursuing and the policy. it is, in

principle, not only with 14 numbers and human lives. and the most important thing is not to break the fraternal and friendly ties between the east slavic peoples, then, in principle, what the main policy of the anglo-saxons in our region is aimed at, therefore jizzinsky announced, when a long time ago in the eighties, in my opinion, yes, he generally announced this books. yes, the name is a little bit longer, but in principle, yes, uh, everything. we are also discussing security, because it seems to me that he is the most relevant he remembered the united nations organization of the state, but we know something. uh, the price of this freak organization is all with you. uh, she does not depend on anything, practically in the world they sit and wipe their pants. well, okay. although there is some kind of platform for meeting people this week, i would not remember here this week, i didn’t arrange it there. uh, one of the leaders of the united nations circus performance chinese journalist decided, uh, it's time to ask

him about double standards. let's let's listen. do you think the presence of the us military in syria is legal or not? this is not what we are dealing with now. at this stage, there was a war. it just sounds very similar this week there was a lot of talk about the un charter, international law and related resolutions, but it seems to me that a foreign, uh, foreign presence, a foreign military base in another state without an invitation, to me, is something like that. your analytics is up to you, but at this stage, what is the difference between the situation in syria and there are no us troops in ukraine in syria. so i don't. so there can be no parallels here. are you sure that there are no american

military in syria? i believe there's fighting going on there , but the presence of the military itself on the ground, i haven't heard of that. okay, five american service members were injured in a strike this week. how could this happen if they are not there, how did they get hurt? it's strange, yes. and by the way, if you are talking about resolutions and international law, then there is a security council resolution number. uh, for number 200 20 number 2254, in my opinion, which says we reaffirm our firm commitment to the sovereignty of independence, the unity and territorial integrity of the syrian arab republic, as well as the purposes and principles of the charter of the un itself yes, i am aware and as you can see, this was approved by the members of the un security council itself so and again, returning to your question. uh, so legal or not, the american

military presence in syria is the us base if you follow the relevant resolution of the resolution i just mentioned yes , the corresponding resolution, indeed to calls for this and we appeal to all states with a request to respect it further. now i don't want to comment. well, what a lie, you bastard. just look, you bastard, wait, the us military is not only in syria the us military is in iraq the us military is in ukraine in ukraine save for now no replacement for today. this tool distinguishes the salary for an angel secretary. this is how it behaves. everything

is very simple this freedom of speech, but they have, but you need to understand that they invaded iraq without any resolutions, moreover, contrary to the decisions of the security council, he did not receive approval to puke. they wanted 200 million people, 200 million and return to the message of the president, who said today that, in principle, all these crises that we have and the military, primarily in ukraine, including the connection with the interests of the united states and the poor more. this clearly needs to be known due to the fact that such bedding at the leadership and such serious organizations. see. what a degradation of native officials. okay, he is now the deputy general secretary of an. everyone was waiting for a european diplomat politician, what will he be like? i compare everything to the predecessor of what i remember when i began

to be interested in politics javier pers decuel, a prominent figure during the aggravation of the cold war. what role did he play in settling, let's say, the early iraqi conflict and so on, uh, they will be blown up. well , it's just the most ingenious vera disagree. now against this background, you make a fool of yourself, but this zamnesek , who stammers incomprehensibly, who is afraid to give an assessment, which runs away from journalists, who, in fact, are going through the security council, are going through the general sombrection of the degeneral secretary. from him, no one requires some kind of bright position. it's not up to him- on the contrary, he doesn't have why he is very active than when it was necessary to push through the grain deal. uh-huh that's when we hear a lot about mice they said, but in politics and today the president vividly touched on this topic sun. he remembered merkel, alanta, yes, who signed, and he spoke correctly. they are now like this merkel is lying, yes, uh, and that's it, and that's it. she stopped.

she, as a politician, destroyed herself, nothing good will remain in history about her, because she lowered her own signature and her own opinion below the plinth for the sake of the current political conjuncture exclusively, and this guy, whom we showed with a thermos with a salary of 20,000 dollars a month . yes, he perfectly understands that it is better for him to lie. several times it is better for him to pretend to be an idiot so that the extra six months of a year or two years, it turns out that this not sickly salary what kind of organization to become? you know, they paid attention. and how much does the war earn? he emphasized today that the war is going on, because millions of dollars are being earned on it, that the military industry is profiting from the american and other countries of belarus, by the way. five in parallel, that’s all you need to watch belarus has never made money on wars, therefore we are for peace, because we don’t have such interests, something on war to earn, and the war will go on,

because it raises the economy in the united states to take this non-official. e from the organization in the youth. nations today, the president spoke about this, but he projected it onto the elites in this or that country. eh , he did not condemn the united states of america now and did not support them. he wagged, yes, that is, he, if he was different, if he read that the americans were right, he would have said so being, but there are several options for corruption, high salary, salary c blackmail e yes, what else could be a threat against dekompromat. they have them all right, this is stated by the managed. listen sits in weight it is rendered. it's just that this will be included in all diplomatic textbooks. this is a disgrace to world diplomacy. a question is introduced, and the creation of an investigative group. three countries support the explosion at nord stream. group establishment russia china brazil what are the other 12 countries doing abstaining from? yeah

nobody call they don't mind to oppose. it's easy to fall below the film. this is exactly what happened here . absolutely. well raised the point my e message and her, by the way, about the fact that there are no american troops in syria. before the program, we were discussing a greek publication that announced that the russians had attacked a decision-making center on the territory of ukraine at a depth of 130 m. it was located dozens. uh, the military, including 330, died. well, you can fresh news right now. here is a confirmation of the words of the president , the prime minister of hungary said that the countries of the european union are close to making a decision on sending a peacekeeping continent to ukraine well what kind of world is not there? do you understand the continent? that's what i'm saying to the president today. about the escalation of conflicts, but at the same time, is it europe that decides to send a peacekeeping e-continent? no, i want to remind you that putin said that this would be

a legitimate target for the armed forces of the russian federation as soon as they get over the nuance. let's remember. every war ends in peace. this is an axiom. yes, any one will be the same with ukraine, uh, polish television is broadcasting again videos in which the map of ukraine is being modified and in addition to the four regions that are already plus, the odessa region , the nikolaev region up to transnistria, this is the territory of russia , the western regions are divided, poland romania hungary and in ukraine the central part with kiev remains, all this is what the poles are talking about now. they start theirs. why did i remember the war? that's what the president said, we should not give the opportunity now for this escalation to continue. if russia becomes completely military, then it will not be stopped by inertia. remember fiftieth

year fiftieth dash 53 korean war yes she began at the thirty-eighth parallel. first, they reached, almost to the southern tip, the whole of south korea was conquered by the northerners, then it returned almost to the border. south koreans came with china. more precisely, nato troops were there, and he and, first of all, the americans. there, 90% of americans were talking about the fact that 3 million people died. the infrastructure of the two countries was destroyed, completely complete, it ended where it began. that is , you need to negotiate now, the world is needed now, and you do not have hmm understanding, not understanding. a uh, no, assumptions, what could be our western partners and want such a second version of the thirty-eighth parallel, in order to constantly deplete russia, yes, yes, mark

their territory, and on this, in general , disperse under the bruce of russia, fix this bleeding once her peacekeepers. yes, we completely changed him as president, but about banning negotiations. in the same place, one of the points to join nato, they are this agry to ukraine, uh, they will pump up weapons. uh, they will accept him into nato quickly - about what alexander accelerated said, they will accept european union. somewhere around 15-17 million people will remain there, and they don't care. they create an army of 253,000 behind her. the polish army will stand behind her, maybe not behind her back in this territory, they will prepare a striking fist of about 10-15 e. of tank mechanized divisions, and then they will strike anyway. they will not change from the pair that merkel and alan said that they just want, if they join nato, they are unlikely to hit, because it will be the end of the world. yes, now they can hit the question, what about odessa from nikolaev? well, we don't know. i don't know, what plans do the russians have for russia on this

occasion, but under not about it, of course, too much in favor of russia western this option will not work. i think that at best, they would fix the current state of affairs. well, let's see and finish this topic more, so that you understand who we are dealing with. there are absolutely mountains of the united states on the joint use of american nuclear weapons on its territory. we condemn this increase. uh, the threats of peace in europe around the world said the representatives of the ministry of social affairs of warsaw so that you understand and these people teach us how to live. here's how to talk to them, yes, so that we understand what we need to do, and the president said the opposite about something else, if they kalashmat us for something, then we are doing everything right. well, you can imagine what kind of idiots. they consider us his phrases on this topic. i really liked his phrase. she was tough

with a smile, but very tough and understanding. i i want all officials to remember that we are your fairy tales about democracy on land. yes, this is the setting for the elections about everything, that if again i see where it is with you, that some official there begins to fawn over something to explain to tell, only our national interests. that's what is not presidential. the belarusian people will choose the delegates. they are mythical to watch. here i ban. i remember i told me once, by the way, i flew in types. e to moscow and not from here. many of them fly to moscow, russians there, or what? or yes there is russians. you hear the whole plane filled up with marshmallows in the whole plane, they and sausages, which they took out from here, but they wrote the resolution anyway. eh, with regard to belarus well , respectively, have you been pouring tea for coffee for how long? this time the executive committee was there, then these are comments. no, i came to my place in this brussels, and again this is the result of not a single topic. this is already moving on to other conditions from folk actions to historical memory to our

traditions. this is basically what i 'm going to talk about now. here are the two conditions. you can merge, uh, into one. you, probably guess what i'm going to talk about what is happening with the ukrainian orthodox church. uh, yuri valery did not give out a tough post in the telegram. we reposted, of course, because it's true, uh, i want to start again. let's remember 2020. remember, we had such people from the magars who wanted, or rather, the west wanted it with the help of waving. uh, carry out the seizure of power, then the national security sector reform was published. remember that scandalous document that they quickly cleaned up, because it turned out to be a scandal when people read and said no. wait. we don’t want to go through such changes, we don’t want such a point there was the restoration of the belarusian autocephalous orthodox church, as a national alternative to the belarusian exarchate of the russian orthodox church of the moscow patriarchate. eh, there would be a squeeze. yes, yes, the belarusian church is in the hands of these crooks. if you don't know,

you can't imagine. eh, how would that happen. now i'm asking you to run. uh, video for our viewers for you, which you naturally saw. this is how it happens. uh, crossing. eh, what about kyiv? well, you say , the kiev russ of kiev closed the last orthodox church in ivano-frankivsk, orthodox churches appeared schismatics , their authorities recognized those who disagree, the priests were expelled. these are the young nazis from e. the temple, there, here, they don’t even take off their hats, right? listen to temples, tossed and imprisoned orgasm, and somewhere in the west of ukraine and at all. here we see these frames burned. e open call their leaders. burn temples. me like a couple of months ago. maybe, half a year he said about the fact that we would have such a thing and trouble is coming in ukraine. i remember, in my opinion, our garbage dump niva look from shimatesman, pupozhaya our people. why

fried residents, and now a demonic one will come from behind, who casts them out. see what he looks like. here people come out, yes, in a hat, without taking off to church, some azov people they want to destroy. uh, the last saint. what does the ukrainian people have and break the tunic that connects with the fraternal russian people. they took away the country, they took away 500,000 lives. now they want to take away faith, lord. and then. they can fill in any profitable ideology. yes, and what is happening with the church and the sphere, we know that the worst civil wars begin with this. the most terrible conflict and the most terrible massacre in the history of mankind, even in the face of repression in ukraine, the lack of freedom of speech is brainwashing. all the same , indignation was heard not just voices, but

voices of sincere indignation. this suggests that the holy of those people who are they simply do not, but in fact this is actually a deliberate policy, because the west has discredited the orthodox church throughout the entire time of its existence, ridiculed, they say that it is some kind of outdated. yes, they sing anything with any price to pick up, there are some songs. this is true, which means that in the 1940s , the movement of the patriarchate of constantinople began with moscow ; the next thing that is happening now in montenegro is mila djukanovic the most long-term politician in europe for a second in 1989. in all glued positions in power, he led the line to split the church, which led to a political crisis. saakashvili comes to power simply by the popularity of the georgian orthodox church. it is incomparable to anything

that came into conflict with the church, squeezing it out in order to lower its authority. it's easy and patriarchal. i can continue this news, but their task is to minimize the influence of the orthodox church by expelling and rooting. uh, split here here the country, by the way, is talking about some kind of restoration of belarusian in such a way that there were two projects in the 20th century. there are autonomous autocephalies. the first behind the first project was the ogpu in the twentieth year. they are like the communists, all these tishki. yes, the second point is that sd created during the great patriotic war. well, now we obviously see a third. the secret services are the cia that promotes all this. well, here's just one point to emphasize. we are 70% in ukraine, and the population is orthodox. yes, and here it is in one frantsevich correctly said about belarus, but in ukraine, the same thing began in the forty-second forty-fourth year. this fuss about restoring the autocephalous church. yes, that is, the split was then outlined precisely during, uh,

fascist occupation. let's say at the scene in tongues. and the separation from moscow is like this. yes, it's just from this paper. sorry from sergeevich which we published here, but they then in the twentieth year this church is a small point. there was a gap in moscow from moscow in the economy in the politics of culture, the prohibition of language. no. it says there one belarusian we know it's a ban. and this is just one of the points. this is true, and at the same time, after the collapse of the soviet union, the autocephalous church existed in ukraine; it was simply the only one for the light that actually did not receive its distribution. it was present mainly in the western regions of ukraine in ternopil in lvov, just in the occipital region it was like the kiev patriarchate, yes, and but the fact is that it had a small number of dioceses, incomparable with the number of techparchies, which belonged to the ukrainian orthodox church. well, the so-called moscow patriarchate, and

only in the nineteenth year, there was an activation. and note historically. well, actually interesting historical moments. indeed, in the nineteenth year, presidential elections were held these days. yes zelensky yes you these days in the eighteenth year in december this schismatic congress took place to create, and the orthodox church of ukraine autocephalous and in e. in the 19th century , the activation of this process began, which has now received its legitimate continuation. rather, as laws, a natural continuation is a logical one. yes, against the background of finally stabbing society and thereby, thereby pouring even more fire, because no one needs a calm peace process in ukraine in the west. no, not in the west, as today the president emphasized the anglo-saxon president here today, of course, he went through hard. yes, i walked through the west and finally. in general, he said what he hinted at a long time ago without smell. the west

is the affected party. uh, like us, to some extent, look for american the trace of everything is to blame on america, an interesting opinion that they think they opened a telegram channel one for 500,000 approximately russian right now there is a message from lukashenka to the belarusian people and a very sharp anti-ukrainian meeting. in a sense, against the current ukrainian government , there is much more anti-ukrainian than our russian official funny bold wrote. it's just that the president is used to saying what you think he thinks, he can't stand it. e corrupt officials, preda spineless politicians who well, zelensky is not a secret, uh lay down just put his country under the americans. let's put it this way, but i heard about the belarusian appeal. yes, they are anti-ukrainian yes, there are authorities and yes, there were a lot of harsh and critical assessments of the situation in ukraine in terms of

actions, especially the european authorities. but what the president also said about ukraine was so that a real assessment is needed there, so that the world stops there, but in fact the whole message. here we have concentrated on only one part, yes , related to security in essence. but still there were many. what are the social sphere and the economy talking about, right down to some narrow, seemingly small things at first glance. there from the transport structure of the structure yes, the president mentioned. yes , medicine, in any case, this message was primarily focused on our internal development, and the president summed up that the basis of the economy is the economy, he said, give me a good economy. all the rest. this is my concern. i mean security, military security. and to this, you also need to talk about this, listen again, re-read what

what was said by the president was that the sanctions against us are being introduced at this time of opportunity, and then, of course, many doubted, then after 3 years the president confirms this with specific figures. look at the concrete initiatives. that’s just what this news is about against the backdrop of tactical nuclear weapons, the peace initiative in ukraine may somehow not be heard, but in education, what is important for me is actually the creation of a single shanghai educational space discredited obolon system the most important initiative. now it needs to be promoted. what happened with yury valeryevich's filing. although the president said before, you specified the commission, which was created for the fugitives by the twenty-fifth decree of february 6 , can also consider cases. uh, so those who we know, these artists are some athletes who succumbed to pressure somewhere, got scared, couldn’t stand it, now changed their minds, but they didn’t leave anywhere. they are here, they are looking for ways

to say something back at a big price. our patriotic public is very critical of this, to put it mildly. eh, and here you need to consider i don't know. do we need to discuss this topic now, but it sounded and the president actually gave the go-ahead, as i understand it. yes? well, you know why it was said, yes, but without this it is impossible to ensure the unity of society. this is the most important thing for us, because it is hardly possible to turn us over only from the inside. outside forces will do it. well, let's say from some external perimeter. but what we have and he said, look, if the 20th year did not happen, then it would be worthwhile to invent it so that we understand what is happening with us in general, because nuclear weapons will be deployed here now. we can only be destroyed from the inside, only

from the inside, and attempts to continue every election will be the president. today i said one more thing about the elections, which are already starting in 2024. in fact, it's less than a year away. it will be a truly historic day. for the first time in the history of belarus, we are electing to one day of all deputies, starting from the district, ending with the council of the republic a. then nothing like this has ever happened to belarusians. this is a huge job, but also for the west for our enemies. it is possible, and they will do it without fail, and today the president said that we have never had peaceful elections. never will be as long as we pursue a sovereign policy, so this must be taken very seriously, and ahead of the twenty-fifth year. and this is presidential departures for agents and after not curtailing many programs in that including the fact that, of course, you can do it so that candidates for deputies are killed, i say it as it is, that there can be

a murder of a delegate, an attempt by the entire belarusian assembly to intimidate me, so that someone is afraid to go to the polls, so that they are afraid to be nominated especially to local councils. if there are only 110 deputies in parliament, then, excuse me, i don't remember exactly how many thousands more the corps is now 18,000 people. it should be you, not just anyhow. who are always prepared people, starting with the city council to intimidate so that a person would sit and think. why should i go to the polls, suddenly something will happen less, because they reduced the number of deputies, but in any case, any electoral company. no will always be used by external forces to split the society. if we look at the history of all colored people, there is quieter peace, because this is my opinion, because the belarusian people are lovely, they have acquired such immunity to calm down, you can’t calm down. in the area somewhere sit officials sieve said voskresensky everything is quiet. good calm. no,

relax, remember above participated, when they came up with three percent. let's think of something for these elections in the other direction. more. look at the president running immigration attention, as he referred to here has disappeared. i wrote this. this is some kind of five-page assessment of the situation in that i will not name a person for informational work, then check medical institutions - what is it, according to citizens' requests , work with local housing and communal services infrastructure how many critical moments were there? the president, when you don't have to talk to reassure the stadium to a specific official ivan petrovich there , the head of the village council or district, he refers to himself, refers to his government , refers. and what specific instructions were given? a very busy schedule for both the growth of our industry and the diversification of markets. for the development of new products, because science would lead the production to attract economically, but

there is such an assessment of dan, such tasks are set, what is it worth? e such a big program performance. well he's just emphasized two things about them today practically did not speak, but at the forefront are two conditions that were not called social economy and social justice social justice. this is another condition for the preservation of the sovereignty of independence , uh, we are completing our today's program about the americans, we talk a lot, and today the president spoke a lot to you about this unfortunate one. eh, happy sometimes. quite hmm who likes to get uh life uh everyone and today we heard pec clarke how they unleashed several wars. you are just out of the blue without any evidence, millions , here, oleg sergeevich emotionally said 1,200, but only in iraq, yes, they killed no one is punished. e, clinton is happy enough after certain events and so

on. uh, meanwhile, in the country of eko, there is a catastrophe after another catastrophe, different explanations, some say that petrov and bashir have returned. partisans are pro-russian on the territory of the united states of america. just release the situation in the country. which, by the way, trump talks a lot about, and on this he , among other things, leaves about it. they say it's a common theme. in general, there is a lot of criticism in the usa. even within the democratic party, there is already a relationship, right? so that the banks are a man-made disaster that clashes are shooting in nashville and biden's reaction to this is they, well, in general, one reaction is the intervention of big business to keep his leadership and the democrats laugh at him everything that we see every day he gives reasons to discredit the image of the president usa and let's look at man-made

disasters. we are a small digest. eh, prepared to see the scale of it all. a series of man-made accidents and environmental pollution has swept across almost the entire us state of ohio, and about 50 wagons of a freight train have derailed cargo. the ringing of chloride began to flow out of the tanks and ignited when burned. it turns into a phasgen hydroelectric power station with which soldiers were poisoned during the first world war , clouds literally gathered over the nearest settlements, dangerous chemicals got into storm drains. along the tributaries of the river, the aegean, the death of fish has increased. poultry died at farmers in the district. employees eliminating the consequences of the accident were not provided with personal protective equipment. egm. crashed three times. one of them was carrying 1,400 tons of methanol. the barges were part of a group of

ten ships that broke away from the tug. after colliding with a bridge at the entrance to the portland canal, mitonul is part of a group of toxic alcohols used in glass cleaners and antifreeze. ingestion can lead to death a powerful explosion occurred at a chocolate factory in pennsylvania, two people are known to have died, nine people are missing , eight people are missing.