hello , we continue to discuss the president's address in various formats and sum up the results. what conclusions did the belarusians draw, and what do the experts say? we will show mirny the initiative of our president was picked up by foreign media

. we will explain to whom and why iskanders interfere with poplar polonaises, and the latter, by the way, are being spoken today on all discussion platforms in the media space and our response to the cancellation policy in international sports. anton smolsky won silver at the russian championship more details from my colleagues. into the future analysis of this address to the nation, we continue to discuss the main thing from what was said in the message of dmitry lukashenko and in what statements we noted a courageous act, we will study the fresh press, where in large print, but in the message of our president, and he himself does not realize how poland and the baltic states try on armor and with whom the neighbors are going to fight our answers in a new issue in the form. season spring-summer and iconic places on the historical and cultural map

of our country patriots of belarus are on the road again new kilometers and a motor rally in honor of the day unity of the peoples of belarus and russia details soon. why do the europeans, despite the prohibitions of the authorities, look for partners in the face of the belarusians, that our country responded to the us accusation of deploying nuclear weapons, and why are the belarusians lucky to have a national leader ? the ice and sports denouement ended with a bright hockey performance between the teams of the minsk region of the president of belarus it was the first final and somehow it was within the framework of the panorama step of the final of the president's cup, and handball bags. brest sensationally plays ice-took all the details out. belarus does not trade, its sovereignty is unshakable for us, but it costs a lot of effort to maintain it. this is the lead motive of our president's address to the nation. the six main conditions were voiced by alexander lukashenko in his message to the people

and parliament in essence. this is the guide and we will not be slaves. that's so emotional. the belarusian leaders will say, i appeal to everyone, but this requires the unity of historical memory, economic development, social justice , the ability to protect sovereignty, i am convinced president of independence. it was not easy for us , but it is even more difficult to keep it. this is the misfortune of only politicians and managers. however, the current message is a look at the situation on no terms. why do we need nuclear weapons and what can a fire on the continent lead to, if we ignore peaceful initiatives , we continue to discuss this and many other things in a large and frank conversation with the nation. the main thing from what sounded olga onishchenko will continue. it happens only once a year, thousands in the hall and millions on the other side screens everything you wanted to know and ask about uncut site and the first one, of course, will also be very interesting. so there is no point in calling not to listen to

the president, noticing the head of the administration, they watched, they watch and they will watch. i think that for smart people, and most of them, these destructive calls do not work for the current message in its own way. unique. after all , the next one will be held at the site of the entire belarusian people's assembly in its new constitutional status , however, this is the historical moment. it's not just for us the president, i am convinced that the struggle for world domination has escalated so much that hundreds of thousands are wasted. no, not dollars. well, in general , not yet, the people of ukraine do not need peace. well , who cares about the opinion of this very people. here you have the whole independence of the conflict, which has been brewing for a long time. obviously not unique in nature. after all, what is not a fire, then the president of the west is convinced with irrepressible desire. there, across the ocean, subjugate the whole world and all known hot conflicts flared up and it seems that the war was by proxy -

this is already recognized by everyone as a western trend, and ukraine is just talking about the world and will ask essentially one, but the most important question today. today you will be a hero, you will be at the head , you will ride there, podmakhmut, he sacrifices artyom to scream awards, and as time goes by , people will ask you, why didn’t you prevent the war? why didn't you do everything to prevent this war from happening? and when did it start? why didn’t you stop her and innocent people are dying, who is to blame , it’s clear what the president should do don’t miss the moment, this will not happen in our alexander lukashenko is not sure about the russian ukrainian world history, however, as always there is no alternative to a truce in general, you understand, you know the only way along the coast. negotiations without preconditions right now, and not later. why the answer is a simple military -industrial complex, and i know this

for sure, today in russia it is unfolding at full capacity. and if the military-industrial complex unfolds at full power , it will be difficult to talk about peace. this is a russian cart by inertia. if it rolls, then not enough seem. now it is still possible, but without the right to move troops, weapons and equipment, than without directly measuring it without intermediaries, as if from the west or the east, after all, as you know, even a bad world. the better a good quarrel and the higher the degree of cleavage, the louder the voice of belarus is now the country that, not just, but keeps the agenda of a peaceful resolution. she begins to assert even more strongly that only a peaceful resolution of this conflict is possible, under these conditions, any escalation. it always does not resolve

the conflict, nor does it give opportunities to the parties. eh, find common ground, but only leads to even greater human casualties. all people are sane. thirst for peace to come on the european continent for peace to come and so the crazy race, then finding. the brink of the third world war, because nobody needs it. neither the global financial elites nor the industrial elites need it, or they all want ways out. now the president is saying sensible things. let's stop. let's take our heads in our hands, because before the transition of russia it is a nuclear superpower. and force her encourage her to do something. after all , this is madness, this is real madness, a war that was so wanted that it could not happen, and now they are trying to draw new participants into the funnel of the conflict. not for the first month i have been loudly heard on the second front on our land and about belarus as one of the goals of nato, the president will announce the appearances with a password and talk about what everyone wanted to hear

the nuclear arsenal, which it was decided to return in the name of protection, not pressure. i am not trying to intimidate or blackmail anyone that i talk about this time and time again. the lord is with them. i i want to secure the belarusian state and explain that we no longer want to live under a whip and putin is not a slave . this is how alexander lukashenko sees his sovereignty, not just canvas moments. belarusians have always been able to unite and in the future it is impossible to give a reason to divide people. our historical memory is also a powerful force. time is such that you have to defend it without any compromises, just like protecting your cultural heritage. the president. even say import substitution is, after all, now it’s not only about the economy, the minister of culture will assure the process has gone very important, the settlement of both historical memory and the replacement of cultural

traditions that are sometimes imposed on us from the outside and, of course, we are doing our best to resist our to the viewer all the developments, all the possibilities of the sphere of culture, in my opinion. uh. i am sure of this. we are doing very well. and also social justice, as the guarantor of independence, this cannot be taken away from us, and the president has a strong economy what to boast about, especially in the light of recent scenes, they say the sanctions will destroy everything at once , but the dogs bark the caravan is coming in response to the economic pressure of the sanctions, stressed absolutely illegally on the front, than what alexander lukashenko would call it luxury in the modern world, an independent foreign policy, but without it, sovereignty is hardly possible in this sense. doesn't europe give up its independence, bending under the dictates of overseas, the president will unambiguously notice the sun rises in the east and

this reversal of reasonable reality for us, but belarus does not close its doors to its western neighbors either, they say. it's time to put everything in its place, especially on the example of european politicians. we, uh, see, as diplomacy would literally put it, but we are not like that, we must show our high standard and continue to show it, we must carry it out. our policy should be consistent and this policy should be directed towards peaceful good neighborliness with all our countries that surround us. uh, this is still the future and the people, then they will sort it out anyway and the war will normalize relations back to full economic exchange. not to be confused with the position of the polish government and the government of the business community from poland and ordinary citizens. poland, they are interested in developing cooperation. they are interested in good neighborly relations because their government does not hear them. it's a fact how long it will last. we don't know yet, but again being. as

you can see on the western borders. and we very clearly feel the realization that it is better for the strong to be friends, interact and organize mutually beneficial cooperation. it will come probably even earlier than we thought it stronger. we should be the more willing to live in a peaceful sovereign country. this is not a call to join the arms race. at the extreme, with every slightest provocation, the president repeats again and again what is important for everyone to hear and this is invariable, belarus and we will do everything as a state to save this world, i will say, simply, please. tune in to protect your family, your home, your loved ones, and we will protect our homeland with the military now from us return is required. and we will fulfill the instructions that we heard in the message, the heads of state, all the main points in order to preserve the sovereignty of our

state. our heads the armed forces can never be. eh, in a somewhat relaxed state. they are constantly in such a good tension are constantly held. uh, combat training exercise training. uh, combat duty is rushing, therefore , let's say the intensity of the events, maybe uh, of course, will increase. that's in connection with the situation near our borders. well, in general it's all on schedule. so, day and night , our military guards us, and that this is the maximum readiness the president will assure, but that the sky is peaceful, and the life of a calm years is such for everyone. we need to defend our own military or forceful invasion of belarus, which is not acceptable, first of all, for aggression in precisely this strategy. in my opinion, it will allow us to ensure the peaceful tasks of every citizen living in our country. then everything will turn out the economy is a strong economy and

ensures political stability. how inside the country, and outside of our state and traditions your way the way of the world and the creation of the puppy. ilya bundle is a whole news agency. with special interest to the screens of tvs and their smartphones , millions of eyes abroad clung. moreover, foreign colleagues delved into the essence of what was said about our president, many of whom certainly cannot be suspected of sympathy for our country, but it was they who made quotes from the speech of the belarusian leader on the front page. mr. lukashenko said that moscow's plans to place nuclear weapons in belarus will help protect the country from the threat the west explains to his viewers and moscow will make every effort and means to ensure its sovereignty and independence, he accused. poland its zealous western neighbors in building up the formation of certain

regiments of banners of the legions for the subsequent coup, driving in , argued that minsk was forced to act due to unprecedented pressure from the west and insisted that the deployment did not violate international agreements. sheniy emphasizes from jazir anastasia benedictyuk shed a tear for the reaction in the media and drew conclusions. the resonance will hardly be doubted by anyone, firstly, as always, there are many revelations of insider statements and proposals, the reaction in the world, to which it began at lightning speed. with this very reaction, those who asked questions after the president could even appeal, for example, during a speech alexander lukashenko once again called for a truce between ukraine and russia, and these are the headlines of the russian media, in which the topic received the greatest

response in the statement. here is a quote peskov, where he does not exclude the discussion of details in the highest state world next week. here is a question from the audience and details from the president, someone hastened to name alexander lukashenko as peacekeepers. someone is suddenly an ambassador of peace, but the president, after all, clearly says belarus does not need a status and it's not at all about it. it doesn't matter who will be the moderator cr-dagan or lukashenka. although ukraine then the minsk agreements would not have had so many deaths and devastation. yes, and the crimean ones, after all , the issue could be resolved, otherwise the president reminded, but we return to the truce on 20-23. the main thing is people. well, the ukrainians do not want to take weapons on the battlefield, the commanders themselves are negotiating, the ukrainians warn the russians, they say, today at such and such a square will arrive.

and vice versa, the gag people are talking about something, or that everything is for the sake of russia , the president did not specify which of the parties the appeal was addressed to , vinogradov, head of the st. the conditions for the violation are ironclad, that is, a complete halt of fire throughout territory. ukraine can not be armed redeployed any weapons. the visionary channel calls alexander lukashenko a unique insider, i would like to add. and what president people should know the truth that's why about nuclear weapons. the belarusians from the audience talked a lot and asked questions one after another, but there are a few more clarifications here . this is not blackmail. this return of nuclear weapons was in belarus, so they simply return the orders already given to the military to restore launch sites for

missile systems. poplar even opponents admitted to go for it and tell so openly that belarusians will be courageous and nuclear. behind the cordon, someone was on the alert and tried to say that this was nonsense. but those who listened attentively, surely paid attention to the retreat and to such a reasonable message, the political scientist borovik proposed to place nuclear weapons near the united states . what did the belarusian leader say? need to. we are not poland or lithuania, which will take a step, did not calculate, the next two. herself deployment of nuclear weapons in belarus caused a sharp reaction.

experts agree that the restored poplars will hold back all the political tranquility of the country that possesses them and an important factor in ensuring the national security of the union state, this opinion was shared with our channel by the editor-in-chief of the national defense magazine military expert igor korochenko. a country that has nuclear weapons is a very serious country and, of course, those opponents of the political military of the republic of belarus in the face. poland lithuania will imperceptibly into astrological consequences in the event of its aggressive actions against belarus. therefore, from all points of view, this decision is absolutely thought out. based on the protection of the national interests of the republic of belarus and certainly an important contribution to ensuring the security of the union state, the fact that today the west raised a howl should not embarrass or frighten anyone here. now, if we were applauded in

western capitals, then we could think about the fact that we are doing something wrong. here are the solutions that caused by the threat of the modern world and reliably insure us for any force majeure of a military and political nature. the peoples of eastern europe are just extras and pawns evgeny of america’s strategic game and the task of the belarusians is to play in this game according to their own rules the opinion of the russian political scientist alexander anatolyevich alexander grigorievich lukashenko to kiev conflict the massacre will not stop and this is a sad statement by lukashenka's speech the counter-offensive of ukraine was sounded unconditionally and it is possible, and it is dangerous precisely because the installation

of ukrainian blood is given from across the ocean. do not spare russian blood. do not regret in one word from slavic blood do not spare for the united states in their struggle to maintain global hegemony and russians and ukrainians and belarusians. in general, all the peoples of eastern europe are extras. uh, they're pawns in that strategy game they're playing uh, and here uh. our task is a and russians and belarusians, e play e in this game, a according to our own rules a and prevail in the fight against e, cruel strong and e, superior to us. eh, at least in terms of the number of indicators to the opponents. we are joined by experts in the studio, political scientist alexei belyaev and deputy sergei klishevich, we will discuss with them the theses of the message, which some are trying

to turn upside down or hide certain nuances. a huge wave of publications in the wake of yesterday's message from the president, but i would suggest focusing on some of those where the topic of peace negotiations between russia and ukraine is discussed with reference to alexander lukashenko is the most important topic, but at the same time it is clearly not heard. and what exactly did the belarusian leader offer in the main? these are, of course, unofficial media russian telegram channels, but they also have their own audience, i will allow myself a couple of quotes, all proposals for an immediate cessation. fire. it's not even manilovism. well, gogol read dead souls, the truce without prejudicial conditions and the right to move equipment and reload weapons on both sides. well, seriously , stepping on the same rake for the second time somehow doesn’t feel like the end at all, you get the impression that the author was guided by some headings of the message itself. he looked at this time differently in

russia, hands are completely untied, but this is also verbatim. the date is never the minsk agreements. how can one compare aleksey viktorovich? you were present at the message, and what are your feelings? what did you hear? so i was on the message, i also read the comments. eh, i want to make a point. here in many comments, they say lukashenka is trying again to try on the role of a peacemaker to put himself next to some of the other leaders, so that's what i would like to answer, firstly, alexander grigorievich does not try on anyone's roles, the video was played, for example, by those of our western pseudo-partners who, when signing, mr. poroshenko began to speak. well, when we signed, we were not going to fulfill them. here is the role. this is acting and posturing, if we are talking about the conditions of the world. peace terms have been announced it is not easy to stop hostilities at once . and this is also to ban the movement

of troops so that what happened after the signing of the minsk agreements does not happen again, when some stopped at the borders, and the second there, then they introduce something into the gray zones. i'm talking about everything. now i say, they are trying to deceive there. uh, heavy from the line of contact of the inspector is leaving. immediately it is brought back by the question of what creep? of course, russia also has its own interest, and no one here in this case opposes the interests of russia, russia’s interest, of course, is that this conflict should be an agreement, and now, if ukraine, in violation of this, er, truce, would begin some progress on the front. russia, of course, would have the right to respond to actions, and our president said this, that is, no one says that, uh, lukashenka proposed to take and just stop hostilities there, thus providing , for example, advantages to the ukrainian

side or the russian side. church. history shows today that if only the issues of the conflict, er on the territory, then, er ukraine and russia will be dealt with, the third state, then, er, anglo-saxon or something else, but for many of their political leaders, so to speak. that's all just a means of livelihood. today we know, we see how the process of trade in the production of weapons is going. how loans are allocated for this business and where they then go money, they actually do not see them in ukraine. she only sees weapons. and not the best in the end. this means that this conflict will continue to have e, and further due to the fact that it is simply beneficial for this state. naturally. we understand that belarus is by no means profitable. uh, and it's important for us to stop this, so uh, sophia is here halfway through negotiations and stop here. it is bloodshed, because a person is above all. let's do more. she is already quoted from here. maybe someone remembers this actively advocated a change of power in belarus in 2010 .

and now here is an expert for the ukrainian media, this is what he says, declaring the negotiations lukashenka pursues his own interest, and he claims to be the moderator and main peacemaker, according to lukashenka, if he sits at the head of the negotiating table, this is a res perspective and eventually spill over to our country how the real head of state lukashenka thinks about how to stop this stop. why is that bad? why are psychos and erdogan possible, according to all sorts of judges, but lukashenko is not, what kind of rhetoric is this? all viktorovich about andrei suzdaltsev. uh, had. uh, the misfortune of being personally acquainted with him crossed. yesterday , alexander grigoryevich, about such characters. eh, made a few remarks. and there was a wonderful epithet vile vile man. it's always critical. the union of belarus is calculated, he always tries to say that belarus is supposedly a freeloader, sitting on the neck of russia, which only pulls

pulling pulling does nothing. here was a comment for the ukrainian media yes and this comrade. today, i think it deserves in russia. there is also a law on aliens that deserve this wonderful title. this medals and ouds peacefully experience the development of this conflict. we all understand this very well, apparently, we understand all the attempts on the part of ukraine, uh, through various kinds of provocations , there will be some kind of answer to draw belarus into this conflict. and as the leader of an independent sovereign state. yesterday it was, and the preservation of sovereignty. after all, these was talking. during the entire message, alexander grigorievich offers a scenario that will be beneficial, of course, and beneficial to us, of course, and to everyone else. why do you think that some people are throwing such a message that alexander lukashenko should not be involved in peace negotiations. well, we must be with you in the conditions of the information war , an information war has been declared against us, therefore

, they will naturally fight against us in the information war. front, there will be all sorts of this kind, which means, uh, carry any heresy in telegram channels. there, from the screens of western tvs, newspapers, and so on, they are also actively trying to influence our society in this way. this is just sabotage. yes, that is, he doesn’t give a damn about what is happening in ukraine today, well , he began to spit right away at the beginning of a special military operation immediately offered belarus as a negotiating platform and actually forced two rounds of negotiations to come here. still passed here therefore not to the president to the president. lukashenka is trying to imitate someone, trying to attach all the initiatives of erdogan and our wonderful friend, the respected cd-pin of the chinese leader, they are already secondary . the belarusian position has always been primary, it is not acting, not posturing, not a role. this is our

conviction. and this is what i think, i think that the armies are a couple of the western and some kind of anti- belarusian direction. they are absolutely wrong. they are fundamentally wrong. in his son. not true. thank you for talking. one of the club of editors became the main platform for discussing the president's message, the head of the leading media, the studios of the belteria of the radio company gathered immediately after the speech of the head of state that the world will not be the same is already an axiom , the nuclear modernization of our defensive shield is also important, not a single country that possessed or was, say so voice aggression throughout history. this is the first very important point, secondly, let's look at our respected burghers, yes, germany at 21 . there was a very strong anti-war

the movement is aimed at withdrawing all nuclear weapons by the age of 21 all nuclear weapons from german territory in the twenty-second year, when it began from its threefold increase in the number of people in the polls , the number of people who were in favor of keeping nuclear weapons and added another 15%, who said for what its quantity. enlarge and modernize in order to ensure the security of the state. if we don't trust ourselves, if we don't trust the president, is it okay? take this experience alexander lukashenko continues the line that he has been leading since the fourteenth year. naturally. the president in our region is the only country in our region that stands for peace today. well, the head of the audience on february 24th. it all started on 26. uh, somewhere we continue to make or the president. it's deep. uh, such a wound on the heart that alexander lukashenko perceives the military operations in ukraine as

a civil war inside our house common to russian belarusians and ukrainians, which he actually said, and he makes an attempt, and to prevent further escalation, realizing, as he stated, that, in general, it is almost inevitable. i saw the leaders of the nations who know what to do and see the goal and the goal is very understandable to ensure a peaceful life and development of our state. this is what i saw in all these six components that ensure sovereignty in relation to security, including nuclear weapons, which will be delivered to us, if they listened carefully, remained preserved. and we know that lukashenka just doesn't talk about anything so easily. this is also a reason to think about our let's tell the neighbors. so, look, the full issue of the club of editors on the youtube channel of the news agency settled down. discussion of the main

political event. it continues on all platforms, commenting on the belarusian radio theses and messages of the president doctor of philosophical sciences professor lev khristofovich noted that