he splashed out, maybe he didn’t want to, yes, well, that’s the point . understand correctly what weapons located on the territory of one state mean - this is not a problem, but a policy issue. well, as a policy, maybe i'll understand him, but common sense. not here. you know, the most interesting thing is that it fits very well into the general outline, when georgia is forbidden to copy the us law on enogenous. and canada after 3 days, she is allowed to copy the laws of agents. in this case, it is not democratic, but here it is in full compliance democracy. well, the logic is hard to understand. here, look, what is interesting, the polish minister of affairs. this is an escalation, but a reaction. the west should be calm. this is literally his glory. yes , it turned out to be relatively calm, and the reaction of the united states, although many tried to whip it up on this topic, but, it seems to me, is quite restrained. that 's where this unexpected common sense comes from. oh, at least

these two countries, as far as the united states is concerned, they are realists, they clearly understand what it is. they know how to read the laws. even the ones that shouldn't, but they clearly understand. the main thing is that the nuclear weapons that appeared on the territory of belarus in no way change the overall picture in the european one, provided that in five states there are warehouses of e-u nuclear weapons of the united states, the same e, they have warehouses in the kaliningrad region and the alleged theater of action for them anyway . hmm, they clearly understand something one of the regions of their interests and nothing more, so they are not so calm. as for poland, she is the conductor of the interests of the united states in europe and that

broadcast by the usa they are very good at keeping their nose to the wind representatives of the polish establishment, and they are ready to support in a timely manner. that's right. after all, by and large it is. and, perhaps, we will add to this general. a small piece of the pie because the poles some of them are not so stupid people. well, you can’t call that the slavs after all. yes, there are healthy people among them . this is the person we are talking about now. he simply looked at the big picture. if next to you in the kaliningrad region there is this ammunition on your northern flank, so to speak, what difference does it make to you if they appear, even in the western from the point of view of poland, it doesn’t matter where the rocket comes from. if you can get out of this wake and there will be 10 charges, there will be 100

charges and you will still do what is intended and prescribed for you by your senior comrade. well, it's a pity that barrel is not a pole , not a belarusian, a spaniard, it seems, how to touch it. the president spoke and we are touched. we will answer. now it is clear what we will answer. here then for the sake of completeness, generalize. and what will eventually be placed with us and , in principle , we can probably say again literally the countries that have nuclear weapons, and which have already deployed these nuclear weapons, yes or have declared such intentions, after all, we are talking about them should also speak now. well, it was probably the bison who started it correctly. this is actually a peaceful beast, but if he doesn't stop him in anger, no one hmm history knows when this hmm

good beast destroyed on his way. all, what is possible, and now let's move on to this component. look, there is belarus , a small enough european average country. and what's next in europe? do we have it? let's look at it this way, germany there is a corresponding nuclear storage, they have been there since the time of the warsaw pact , well, aerial bombs are improved and updated a little belong to america yes, everything belongs to america italy has the same approach they say that italy still has certain naval components i will not argue. it's changing all the time, türkiye hmm, the same is, corresponding belgium is the netherlands five, the states of which are warehouses of nuclear tactical weapons of the united states well, the decade of 70 years has long been marked by

nato, well, let's say they have not been there for 70 years. well, not so little. these are those who store in europe who else has in europe we have already said great britain france is a nuclear power with strategic strategic means. and now let's leave europe a little further canada there is also a warehouse nuclear weapons warehouses usa the question is why are they there needed, if the usa is nearby well, yes, you can go a little from the other side, now we are moving a little to the other side, japan in japan does not belong to these states, that is , by and large, almost eight states today, in which us warheads are deployed, let's leave this out of the brackets and let us return again to our european theater of possible actions. yes, god forbid, of course.

what do we have here from the russian side? all nuclear weapons are located on the territory of the russian federation ? land component. well, and, probably , the aviation component, which we always say is part of the forces, concerning the sea, component and ground component, apparently, there is a little bit of the aviation component located in the kaliningrad region. this is part of the territory of the russian federation, so nothing needs to be said here. we are not talking about the fact that the united states has its own huge arsenal, which is located on its territory. these are the states. now, with regard to belarus , the statement is clear, clear, understandable placement. probably all the noise today is from what was not. on this issue, so that everything is clearly arranged and explained, they also publicly say that the president has not

spoken yet. apparently, he will express, well, the president has been talking about this for a year and a half, warning even more than he warned. but i have been working on this issue for the last year and a half very closely in all areas uh-huh, but i would tell you that in addition to the president, other government bodies of the republic of belarus dealt with this issue. the security council, after all, we have adopted a joint, e.g., doctrine of a union state. and there are definite directions. it is our parliament that has also created a legislative framework that allows us to resolve issues to ensure national security. well, a number of the ministry of defense. naturally, joint work. well, and probably a number of others. the president has actually made a decision. yes, the father said, the father did. that's when poland announced its

wishlist to host nuclear weapons. they said it publicly, the president said, we must respond to this in a mirror image and we will prepare for this deadline until july 1. so, anyway, thanks to what this project will be implemented in such a short time? there are two components that need to be discussed first. thank the lord god and history that we have such a leader who keeps his word. and the most important thing is that the potential that belarus had was not squandered. that is, we are economic, let's say something like that, since the times of the soviet union we still have certain opportunities for storing nuclear weapons. there were a lot of such objects in our territory, but we have kept them. we kept this main word, and the second

component is the close interaction of our allies and the russian federation, we clearly understand, well, we started right, the dad said, the dad did. agreement along these lines or agreements were reached earlier and the trigger was the actions of the united west of european states and the events that are taking place in ukraine well, yes, it's like a trigger. this is true. most current event from hard training and an interesting meeting, perfect shooting is obtained when you don’t think about anything, when you could still run about 5 years ago. i thought, why do i need all this at all? every time it was hard

to try to show yourself more work, and it seems to me that this is only for the benefit of victory and defeat. everyone is working very hard in their clubs. i think that we are definitely not getting worse, but there was such a slight excitement, because yes, as they say, we didn’t play together for a long time , see in sports projects on the tv channel belarus 24. what is the impression of a person who visited our country for the first time? i always came here with some emotions , i always waited for this trip to minsk . and how friends communicate with them. so it was like eveli people who do not like to have fun, but love the life of each of them with belarus has its own story. in fact, it was a very interesting experience that i studied here, i got to know a lot of very many

guys. since it was a belarusian smart gymnasium, belarus has one word for me. she is very important opportunity. i believe that in fact, during all this time, minsk has become not the second hometown. see in the program a look at belarus on belarus 24 tv channel . we really live importantly and very importantly, but in my system of coordinates, sincere and motivated stupidity is even worse than smart and cold-blooded calculation. i really love coincidence. especially those coincidences, about which one can and should say. accidents are not accidental, the presence of problems does not negate the presence of achievements. we are wonderful, but we are not ideal. we have. in what to become better success is achieved by those who are ready for titanic work not only on the result

, but also on themselves china again, yes, against the backdrop of sanctions and threats. well, let's say, let's say stupid about taiwanese attacks on this palace trip. although sour , he always urged not to provoke. this is the rapprochement of the two superpowers. well smell. naturally, he did not calculate the possibility of such decisive retaliatory actions on the part of belarus and russia to deploy tactical nuclear weapons. here on the territory of belarus for sure. it wasn't spelled out. how can we say. so the development of events was not thought, in your opinion, in which you can even hear your very smart political scientists, to whom i relate. marat sergeevich, you know, i

would not argue so deeply that they were not ready for this issue. i'm pretty sure there was some research into their factories thoughts in which these questions were considered, i admit as an option, as an option, but here it is the second part of the question on the main one and it is in the following. why the west didn't want to see it, but didn't want to. he sees this because of his arrogance and habit of treating everyone else like a jungle. this is exactly the right word, which for decades, uh, has been cultivated in western politics. they believed in their impunity, they believed in their hmm sublimity or perhaps that is the word

pick up. in its permissiveness i would call it that and a new iteration of western politicians who have not seen it. e relics of the soviet union who have forgotten what is the great patriotic war. they were brought up contempt for all other states, it was before this system. slavery, which was many years ago, it is at the heart of all this , but these people, forgetting that you can get an answer, as normal people say, decided that everything is permissible for them so that among the analytical community there is enough, but there is a strong people who look far enough away , including zhiznenzinsk, no matter how hater he is of both russia and belarus and an extremely

right person, but he spoke for many years even before that he said that it should not be allowed. uh, so let's say the unification of russia and china must be separated, which has been done for many, that its sanctions pressure and a blow to russia cannot be sustained. here in my opinion. it is precisely this fundamental mistake, that is, russia should have been completely by the twenty-third year. stop developing like we said to fall apart, like a state, after all, what are they talking about, ma, like a mantra , tells that russia should fall apart into a component and they broadcast it in all e on the media on all kinds of platforms. this is the mistake that the west made, they could not even imagine that

any state could withstand such a powerful blow . accordingly, the creation of these correct timely movement of the leadership, the joint work of russia and belarus, and we are quietly. we get out of this corkscrew. and what will happen to the west, time will tell. the most interesting thing here is that history does not teach anything. uh, once hitler was absolutely sure that he would ruin the country in the twentieth year. whole lecture courses were passed around poland, which promised that by the year 25 russia would turn into 30 independent states. they really went with these lectures with maps and demonstrated it, but they also forgot the tanks in berlin and cossacks in paris yes, i really like it. here is an anecdote. yes, but

still an information war. we lost. yes, when two cossacks argue somewhere there in a wagon. well, never evgenievich nato , it, meanwhile, is also not shy at the time, and it’s just like a tank without brakes. let's and they create direct threats already from the northern borders. yes, a union state. this greatly changes the configuration of forces in the northern region. here is the deployment of nuclear weapons on our territory. we have in belarus, it also changes the balance of power to a certain extent. well, let's say that. we are voicing not only that we will store nuclear warheads on our territory. well, we also have iskanders . how many kilometers. yes, and there i really like 500 km - this is what the russian claims. yes, for some reason, the americans write in separate articles that the range is good for joint steps. here is belarus, russia, if you look like this globally, it is more than

justified. yes, but where is chess, where checkmate, and where is the zunk, if the territory is chess, in order to predict development options, one must have the maximum amount of information. i repeatedly. eh, i remember in my life such moments when hasty forecasts did not lead to anything good in our situation. well, we started with what, but it appears? new members of nato, yes, but all these years they were considered as potential adversaries. well, if not the republic and belarus , then the russian federation is definitely my experience of communicating with russian colleagues. clearly says this, but did not consider. uh the need to take into account the potential of these states in the face of god forbid, so to speak , confrontation in this region, and everything that these states did. a step is not a knife

, they were really ready to use their potential in the interests of nato, i am far from thinking that our russian colleagues do not take this into account, so it’s impossible to talk about it as something new. further the entire infrastructure, er, these northern european states, it has long been adapted to the interests of the above for the transfer of forces and means for storage to solve problems. well let's go back to history of the great patriotic war. how many kilometers they advanced towards russia and let's stop there for now. that's all and the question is how ready and willing they are to fight. maybe today they have a certain wariness, which would still be how the finns traveled, how they went to st. petersburg for shopping and other issues, so they will continue.

if they have such an opportunity, if the border is closed, then another question, but these countries are unlikely to want to fight. my logic tells me a little that it's one thing when here you have a gun, but another thing is when you take it out and start demonstrating the transfer of waving your other uh at your opponent. let's just say, after all, in due time, the finnish war. it began precisely in order to move the threat away, even from the same leningrad a little bit further, despite , let's say, rather ambiguous results of this finnish winter campaign. well, this problem has been solved. here, i would probably add the following and we took into account the historical lesson weapons on the territory of the republic of belarus. real answer to the data. unfriendly steps in relation to the union state is provocative, but here it is impossible not to touch on this topic. uh, even more so with a ph.d. in

the near future with a supporter of zelensky rahami, yes , who participated in the negotiations initially once peacefully, he said that the mobilization of men was in full force. now it will be accelerated for the recruitment of units that will be deployed on the border with belarus as a response to the deployment of nuclear weapons, and i don’t really see the logic, but in your opinion, who are these statements designed for. and what really? maybe we can stand behind them, let’s start with the first one for whom these statements are intended for european partners, and the strange supporter of ukraine demonstrates loyalty once again, even more we show that we are ready not only to fight with russia, but almost to close the whole of europe with our own chest. uh-huh this is the first direction the second direction after all. eh, to pay tribute and i

emphasized it again. uh, after all, zelensky and his team are very good pr people. and here there is one more calculation - calculation for their own citizens, who need it too. create an image enemy, after all, as if he had stayed in ukraine and is connected with this state, i clearly say that there are sane people there. and today this escalation is an attempt. show that the country is on fire, the country is surrounded by enemies. and this idea should be hammered into the head of their own people so that they perceive themselves as patriots of the country. they supposedly have to protect their own family. i think this is a deep meaning aimed precisely at this, as the second component, uh-huh, then there is the next war of mobilization. such power is the enemy of belarusians. soon they will come to you. although, to be honest, from

a military point of view, well , absolutely untrue for these statements , they cannot be connected with each other from a military point of view. you know, here's a good team of prs. yes, but this piard has already cost the lives of several hundred thousand ukrainians for a second, just so that we would not forget about it, yes, more and more often, however, i get the impression that the western world against the backdrop of the war in ukraine yes, it has already gone haywire here while these have been exercising to simulate. what will happen to this unfortunate hostage country. these are the pr people of the ninety-fifth quarter, and what finale awaits her? it is very interesting to me. your view, the view of a specialist military man. what ending will be successful for russia what kind of ending can be successful or acceptable for the west and what fate awaits? well, let's just say the rest of ukraine, taking into account already 200 billion, debts that must be paid and the ruin of the economy.

you see, you have raised such a profound issue that the military component here and the economy here and policy. well, let's try to answer this question. i would return to the words of the president of russia, which he said at the beginning of the operation, the purpose of the operation was denocification. remember this phrase. and the demilitarization of this area, this is the first or given area of ​​the second defense, the third defense of the russians, and the people living on the territory of the country, in my opinion, in my opinion. i do not pretend to be the truth in the last stations and do not want to be the person she has already lost. she will lose odessa in all likelihood with nikolaev. these areas

she will lose. and this would be perfect for her. from the point of completion of this confrontation. yes, for her. it would be ideal. in this case, it would have retained its statehood. it would have retained its ethnicity to some extent. and in my opinion. still , sane people should come to power in this country. this is the option that is one of the possible options , the other option is the continuation of the escalation , the development to a higher phase , the destruction of many cities in ukraine , including as an option all this confrontation to the european territory,

maybe, as an option, if you do not sit down at the negotiating table in time? as for the west, it would be ideal for her to destroy russia most importantly so that russia fails to fulfill her task and at the end of the west, the minimum option for the west is. this means that today's 4 areas that have axial actions. regroup ukraine for the time being according to preliminary agreements and continue the uh conflict over time, but in a different form, having prepared the feathers, so to speak, by conducting reformatting everything that is there.

as for the money that has been invested here, the west will not demand it for one simple reason , that it is actually waging a war in ukraine today to disbelieve that someday ukraine will be able to do it, to give up the improbability of attempts will be provided that all this the territory will become part of russia or in some other way become a separate state, not about the western, of course, of course, then the money will try to be other options, it is unlikely to be good, well, given the limitations of our format the last about the philosophical question is traditionally everything. we remember, chekhovskaya, if a gun hangs on the wall, then in the third act it will definitely put it up, but we will never be belarusians. stressed never and no one they were going to shoot. here is the big bang theory. this is not our american cinema. we have our own mirny and this does not hide much

deadly danger. we love breaking patterns. let's go too. but it must be clearly stated. with regard to the deployment of tactical nuclear weapons on our territory , it is timely, correct and thoughtful, and my view as a person who understands what it is and how it can be used. in our case, it should become peacekeeping, a weapon. it could have been entrusted to him and that's it. this is a political component, and as you said, belarus has never threatened anyone. we are ready to defend ourselves. we are ready to defend our independence. and if we keep our word, in this, no one can, so to speak, score

a goal and say that we are wrong. belarusians keep their word if we promise something to any state that possessed nuclear weapons, and there are nine of them in the world today including. north korea, which is constantly, but no one touches, therefore, in my opinion, nuclear weapons on our territory are an element of maintaining peace, stability on our land and our independence, as a state, this is the right decision , verified and it probably corresponds to the time and the situation that has developed next to our country. and what will happen next time will tell, we will see all this. i think we'll hear a lot more on friday. i'm almost certain. thank you thank you we don't tell

dry historical facts, we plunge into the era. this red brick building, located on the eastern outskirts of the city, perfectly resembles the dnieper manufactory, artifacts with centuries of history, a real puzzle for us, as travelers in time, what are these hygiene products , ear sticks, the task of our guides is to ignite in you the desire to touch the belarusian culture, personally. if a girl touches the slutsk nipple belt, it becomes dark. yes there is yes, men only had the right to weave such belts to touch

was in this silver belarus 24. each hero is unique, like his story. i continued to work. after that, to work after work, again, my daughter on my shoulders and home , i must pay tribute to my wife. she always supported me not always. maybe she internally agreed, but she definitely supported that they were united by the sham from interacting with citrus fruits and i didn’t plan to quit . and i don't think anyone can ruin this wonderful relationship with citrus. i'm satisfied, i can't say that i'm somehow very successful there. well i'm satisfied pretty with yourself pretty with your results pretty with your life russia always has a place to go a person should be happy to go to work and be happy to return home. meet the talented ideas

of belarusians in the project of the same name on our tv channel. you yourself must understand that detectives are not built like that. you have a crime that is revealed on the first attempt, there must be at least two false suspects. better yet, three or four.

your detective is a boring type, he gets all the information from his informants or himself criminals. but what about the guesswork insight of the mysterious clues in the end, where the protagonist and antagonist clash in the final, they are false suspects. well, what are you wearing? are you a really working operative you will be the profession of turn, at least boris akunin and your approach to writing a detective story? forgive me, please, this is some kind of professional deformation. this is your professional. deformation in the heads of three pizzas, why do you have such a strange pseudonym three pizzas or is this your real last name? listen, back off. here is my last name. this a respectable old name.

will you print me? hello verochka this pavel good afternoon. hello yulechka, this is a small present for you, i brought my next opus. but if you want, i can bring tomorrow. i 'm going on vacation today, but i'll take it with me with pleasure. i'll wait verochka well, to be honest, it hardly exists,

i'll bring a certain detective format like that. maybe then it will close over the text? such a boring one. the working day is over and it’s not a pity for you to spend your vacation in the country. i would go somewhere by the sea. yulia stay for now while the sea

pause, it became hard to go far, of course, uncle mish if i knew that he was heavy. i would this year myself. no, i'm not lying. you can see the car crashes. something expensive appliances

hello hello neighbor. i see you got a new one there. yeah, they still steal the same thing every year. okay, it might work. by the way, i downloaded the concert pebbles for you. this is a cool thing

to buy for yourself, firstly, it’s convenient instead of going down, you don’t change your position and then the lower backs don’t tense up so much. studied well all the time lower back hurt. have you gone crazy sick? how did you forget that you have an osteopath neighbor? uncomfortable uncomfortable all convenient. stop doing that. come on, don't be shy. come next door. i will heal you. well, here it should fit everything. well, i borrowed the sister-in-law - this is the sister of the wife's wife. yes, that's such an event . in my life, verochka, you know, somehow it didn’t work out. personal bright

loneliness, well, yes, okay, it's a pity i can take care of one more eyes. stunned

the documents you have left from this device of yours are a warranty card, there is a serial number.