which will later be assembled into a single canvas 3x2.5 m in size, according to the plan, the map of the country will include the main symbols of the tangible and intangible cultural heritage of the kluluk region. orsha on the map of belarus will be marked with traditional women's costumes for this area. rodotsky district, the card forging will present the technology of openwork rolling and straw weaving, the raffle of the shashnik, so the wreaths themselves will be indicated, who, unaware of this ravine, is vermetic, brother. i'm being held at the victim's improving the low area of ​​the 21st element. e vitebsk region carried away a retained list of 40 belarus in minsk on the eve of independence day more than half a thousand performers and groups have applied to participate in the radio contest young talents of belarus, it will be held for the 12th time. today the jury began to listen to the audio and watch the video of the hype among the participants in the traditional pop vocal nomination. there are over two hundred vocalists in the jury of 12

people, who decide the voice for the people's artist of belarus as the artistic director of the bioside ensemble. leonidas for bread the audition will run until april 10th. the bolshoi theater is going on tour to uzbekistan in tashkent on wednesday, the ballet troupe will give a performance of spartacus the charm of the ballet the story of the most famous uprising against rome 40 years ago, master valentin elizariev put on pointe shoes, uzbek aesthetes, will see the belarusian reading for the first time in the tour schedule of artists of the big theater this year and other countries. there are several invitations to china among the waypoints for the future of egypt to cooperate with offers the cairo opera. harvest beeps of the country at the local trade and feats were created, remember ohviar and the heroes of pakuyma we know our memory by the gentlemen on

earth, ruts, let's not forget ukraine or the people, the great little yanas shackle the hysterical truth and guess the memory of the common varta for usyods. scattered by them is the central figure. that's u man control. it's gone. the road of life to freedom to freedom. you are giving up. you are emotions. avangard even has my land on tv channel belarus 204. the motives that led them to the village are completely different while the company is growing, interesting and then, and then it gets boring not interesting, but here is such a cool idea. uh-huh. and my wife and i. let's go. let's go. and we really

liked this kind of life here. and how did you understand? here's what you'll be doing next. what will be the path of life or maybe what we did immediately after and complete several tasks around the house, if vasya hay mansions, words. no, you pinch sasha with your thumb, you see, it's beautiful.

nikolai evgenievich good evening, let's start with the main answers from the first mouth, we will certainly hear on friday on the message. well, after all , we have tactical nuclear weapons makes belarus a nuclear power automatically. definitely not, we are not becoming a nuclear power in order to understand the essence of the issue.

you just need to look at what a nuclear power is, in accordance with today's international documents , a nuclear power is recognized on the condition that it develops nuclear weapons, if it produces them, if it still tests them. these are the three components that make a country a nuclear power none. of these components does not apply to the republic of belarus when placed on its territory nuclear weapons or tactical nuclear weapons is good, but i still remember how the last poplars were taken away from belarus yes , for free, as a gesture of goodwill from a country that wants to exist peacefully with its neighbors. we have always emphasized this and have never threatened anyone. here, help me remember what i promised. the west is grateful to us for the fact that we did this and that the military-political plan has changed globally over this period. well,

in this case, you need to go deep into history, probably, after all, history. she shows all the nuances and remember the budapest , in my opinion, imrandum of 1994. it was and a whole generation has already grown up, which , probably, has not even heard of it. in my opinion. in any case, the budapest memorandum. this is the kind of document that many want to forget today. it's small there. god bless the russians. english russian from russian-belarusian english is fine, and here are just six points, what was in these six points, so the first point is a declarative strange signer. and this is the united states

great britain and russia guarantee the republic of belarus respect for its territorial integrity. independence and the constitutional order, the second point was long ago, but if i'm not mistaken, it sounded with the motive of our country, the republic of belarus will not use military means to solve any problems, and in addition, there was one more point. so i always uh emphasized it, when i had to talk about this topic , their military means will not be used to solve our problem. that is , these are tanks, aircraft produced by these states. and the third point is generally an amazing thing, because it has been crossed out for a very long time and, probably, those people who want to hear us simply and simply. they will say this was not, he sounded as follows : strange signatories will refrain from using it.

economic economic pressure is precisely on the state to achieve any preferences that is , they speak russian those who were not born before the ninety-fourth year and have not read it. this document today will say this was not the other three paragraphs. they are very simple. they they say that they will use the mechanisms of the un on the condition that , uh, nuclear weapons are used against our country, uh, the previous paragraph is violated, one of the paragraphs was either the fifth or the sixth. this means that nuclear weapons will not be used against any country that has signed this memorandum. just a miracle. they said the wording of the sanctions against belarus was first introduced 3 years after the signing of this memorandum in the ninety-seventh year, because their memory was so short in saying that when they were raised the issue of the investigation of the terrorist attack on

the nord streams. yes, how he reacted jointly as an organization, which, unfortunately, let's just say to call a spade a spade. covers terrorist acts on an international scale. and i said something wrong, i remembered the story. and now i propose to see what has changed from that moment to today, even point by point. let's start from the very bottom. as you said the united nations, how much the mechanisms of the united nations used in the interests of the republic of belarus in any way. we are practically on all platforms. it is they who artificially try to make us exactly like that. in other words, this is already violating the agreement that was discussed in 1994, in which in 1996 we all fulfilled our obligations in full. you, as you said, you saw nuclear weapons from your territory. now

let's get back a little, with regard to economic sanctions, there is not even any. well, alter that and i would like to turn to one more paragraph. it was said there, not trying to create for themselves or any economic preferences, that is, these countries are our most leading enterprises. all are destroyed , blocked and completely banned, as soon as we have growth somewhere in any area of ​​it. they destroy it right there. this applies in its entirety. and, probably, the most beautiful and good point is respect for our independence and territorial integrity. that is, we went from the opposite and saw that everything that was written in this document today completely ignored is not the first to be ignored. here, negotiate with them. after that, you can move on to the next well. well let's call. what is the difference between tactical nuclear weapons and strategic ones? the question

is very deep. well, at least this way, well, in the general sense, the next tactical nuclear weapon assumes low ranges of destruction, that is, in the area of ​​operational use, so to speak. uh-huh and small uh, tens of kiloton charges, a kiloton, no more, that is, roughly speaking, for solving local military tasks. here you are correctly formulated, probably, local or operational-tactical tasks, let's call it a military point of view, but more correctly, as regards strategic nuclear weapons. a simple wording that uses almost all of this, that weapon that can be used by intercontinental means or between continents russia united states russia australia is a powerful weapon that has and plus a power

comparable to megatons. uh, the total amount of funds that not all one can, so to speak there are six to 12 combat missiles and one each, but this, as a rule, is no longer used. allows you to wipe it off the face of the earth, we can get it with tactical weapons, and before the biden , there is an exclusively strategic task for this, which must be solved somehow. an oxymoron, but the deployment of such weapons is not a threat, but imho security for belarus is in this regard. which means a nuclear weapon or a threshold country on whose territory a nuclear weapon is stored, for example, ok let's try the threshold country appeared not so long term. generally. this is the end

of the last century. somewhere, maybe in the eighties. so, when many states tried, uh, to get nuclear weapons, to achieve their development and fulfill these criteria to develop, which a highly developed industry has. including nuclear energy and the ability , if necessary, to create these weapons, that is, it has technological capabilities. this is a threshold country and there are quite a lot of them in today's world. well, it's definitely possible talking about germany is a country that has crossed japan which can be unambiguously called a threshold country in europe north korea is already a nuclear country south has such capabilities. they also had the information at the time. hosted by the americans. there are different things on its territory and today there is such information. it is not

confirmed on the territory of south korea there are nuclear munitions and charges of the united states, therefore brazil can be such a country, and in europe in europe there is more in principle, no one needs it, because the five states of europe today have all-nuclear powers, spain has the potential to develop nuclear italy has the ability, that is, in principle, hmm highly developed save. yes , for example, in belgium as such it may be and there is no need for its appearance. it is clear, well, intelligibly. well, look, an old friend of belarus, grandfather is sick. yes, he said that nuclear weapons. this is a threat to us . for the security of europe. there is such a level of nonsense, you know, in general, barrel is such an interesting character who sometimes speaks

something that he himself does not understand, and sometimes, on the contrary , they broadcast those ideas that there is no need to bring to the public, but they boil inside him, but a particularly beautiful expression about the european garden. well, it's just yes, and the jungle is a great option, which showed its inner essence and, in general, the inner essence of european. well europeans. i spilled it on me. maybe he didn't want to hold back. yes, that's exactly what makes sense. understand correctly what weapons located on the territory mean one state. this is not a problem, it is not clear from the point of view of politics. well, as a policy, maybe i'll understand it, but you don't know common sense here. it is interesting that this fits very well into the general outline, when georgia is prohibited from copying the us law on

enogenes. and canada, after 3 days, she is allowed to copy the law on other agents, in this case it is not democratic, and here is full compliance with democracy. well, the logic is hard to understand. here, look, what is interesting, the polish minister for eu affairs, he said that at least the deployment of a nuclear potential, yes tactical nuclear weapons in belarus is an escalation, but a reaction. the west should be calm. this is literally slava . yes, the reaction of the united states turned out to be relatively calm , although many tried to escalate it on this topic, but, it seems to me, it was rather restrained. that's where this unexpected common sense comes from. oh , at least in these two countries. as for the united states, they are realists, they clearly understand what it is, they know how to read the laws. even those who do not follow, but they clearly understand. the main thing is nuclear weapons, which appeared on the territory of belarus in no way changes the overall picture

of the states, the same ones, they have warehouses in the kaliningrad region. yeah, and from the point of view of the general situation for the united states, which are thousands of kilometers away from this alleged theater of operations, they don’t care. hmm, they clearly understand something one of the regions of their interests and nothing more, therefore, not so calm. as for poland, it is a conductor of the interests of the united states in europe and what is broadcast by the usa, they keep their nose very well downwind representatives of the polish establishment. and, perhaps, we will add to this general. a small piece of the pie because the poles some of them are not so stupid people. well, you can’t call that the slavs after all. yes, there are healthy people among them

. this person, which is now being discussed. he simply looked at the big picture. if next to you in the kaliningrad region there is this ammunition on your northern flank, so to speak, what difference does it make to you if they appear, also on the western from the point of view poland doesn't care where they fly to you from. you cannot get out of this kilvatator and there will be 10 charges, there will be 100 charges, and you will still do what is intended and prescribed for you by your senior comrade. well, it's a pity that barrel is not a pole, not belarus, nor russian male animals, which should not be touched. the president spoke and we are touched. we will answer. now it is clear what we will answer. here then for completeness of a picture, generalize. and what will eventually be placed with us and, in principle, we can probably say the countries again, literally,

which possesses nuclear weapons, and which has already hosted these nuclear weapons, yes , or declared such intentions, because we should also talk about them now. well, it was probably the bison who started it correctly. it's actually peacefully known that hmm the good beast was destroying on its way. all that is possible, and now let's move on to this component. look, there is a rather small european average statistical country in belarus. and what next in europe is a nuclear storage facility? they have been there since the warsaw pact, well, the air bomb is basically, yes, they mostly have bombs, and they were not stored there, they were only improved and updated a little . they belong to america. yes, everything belongs in america. italy has the same approach . they say that there are still

certain marine components i will not argue. this is changing all the time, turkey is the same, there are corresponding ones. there are five netherlands, whose states have warehouses of nuclear tactical weapons of the united states and they did not interfere with anyone, including nato about them remembered throughout. well, decades of 70 years have long been marked on toppe, who else has in europe, we have already said great britain france is a nuclear power with strategic means, and now let's leave europe a little further canada there is also a warehouse of nuclear weapons warehouses usa question. why are they needed there, if you can go in next to the usa on the other side, now we’ll go a little to the other side japan in japan

there is stockpiled nuclear munitions usa south korea and there is almost an account eight states today in which us warheads are deployed, let's leave this out of the picture and return again to our european one. theater of possible actions. yes, god forbid, of course. that we have here from the russian side all the nuclear weapons that find this land component. well, and, probably , the aviation component, which we always say is part of the forces related to the sea, component and ground component, apparently, there is a little bit of the aviation component located in the kaliningrad region. this is part of the territory of the russian federation, therefore there is no need to say anything. we are not talking about the fact that the united states has its own huge arsenal, which is located on its territory. these are the states. now, with regard to belarus

, the statement is clear, clear, understandable placement. a clear position of the leadership of our state is indicated. well, i think that in the coming years we will literally hear this alone and that's it. this is connected precisely with this issue, so that everything is clearly arranged and explained, i say the warning said, even more than he warned. and here worked on this issue for the last year and a half very closely in all areas. uh-huh, but i would tell you that in addition to the president, this issue is the doctrine of the union state. and there are definite directions. it is our parliament, which also created a legislative framework that allows you to resolve issues of ensuring national security, when i agree, the president actually made a decision. yes, the father said, the father did. that's when poland announced

its wishlist to place nuclear weapons in myself. they declared this publicly , the president said, we must respond to this in a mirror image and we will prepare for this. the deadline is set before the first of july. so, anyway, thanks to what this project will be implemented in such a short time? there are two components that need to be discussed first. thank the lord god and history that we have such a leader who keeps his word. and the most important thing is that the potential that belarus had was not squandered. that is, we are economic somehow so to speak, since the days of the soviet union , we still have certain possibilities for storing nuclear weapons. our territory had a lot of such objects, but we have kept them. we kept this main word, and the second component is the close

interaction of our allies and the russian federation, we clearly understand, well, we started right, the old man said, the old man made a reservation. in these areas, or agreements were reached earlier and with a trigger. i'm living kind with the right you forget it i take it with kerosene, a bucket, i lower it all for two weeks. it all gets wet. then i put on rubber gloves. and this must be brought to the state of shiny metal. i went to take out the trash. you hear and attracting respect, i grew about 300 varieties of people who traveled in belarus, and i interacted with thousands of varieties of belarusians

project, i recognize you to cope with your loved ones close people. all those around you live in love consent when it seems to me, and myself. comfortable, credo happiness, in principle, priorities yes family on our tv channel together we will pay attention to the events that have become a global catalyst for chaos, extremist activity in europe, provocation to inter-religious hostility - this is legal, then after that we will look for the cause of what happened and we will analyze who tends to talk a lot, but nothing is different in the author's project is different. watch the new episodes on belarus 24 tv channel. churches don’t

sound boy he is a prisoner in the royal city of yaki zamuda had a resonant political role, we will recognize you behind the architectural popniks of belarus, the goat bukslavets will go deep at once i mentioned and we will tell the protemnitsa of unique places, fuck the cap and all this bite off from the sea at home the architecture of belarus on belarus 26 tv channel

. well, look, retaksperts believe that the west did not foresee such a rapprochement between russia and china once, but against the backdrop of sanctions and threats. well, let's say so stupid about taiwanese attacks. e voyage of this palace, yes pelosi, as she said, although sour, he always urged not to provoke. this is the rapprochement of the two superpowers. well, the smell. naturally, he did not calculate the possibilities of such decisive response from belarus and russia to deploy toxic nuclear weapons. here on the territory of belarus for sure. it wasn't spelled out. how can we say. so the development of events was not thought, in your opinion, in which you can even hear your very smart political scientists, to whom i relate. marat sergeevich, you know, i would not

argue so deeply that they are not thoughts in which these issues were considered, i admit as an option, as an option, but here it is the second part of the question on the main and she's next. why the west didn't want to see it, but didn't want to. he sees this because of his arrogance and habit of treating everyone else like a jungle. this is exactly the right word, which for decades uh, has been cultivated in western politics. they believed in their impunity, they believed in their hmm loftiness, or probably, pick up such a word. all permissiveness i called it like this and the new iteration of pouring in them was

brought up contempt for all other states, it was before this system. slavery, which was many years ago, it is at the heart of all this , but these people, forgetting that you can get an answer, as normal people say, they decided that they are permissive because among the analytical community there is enough, but strong and there are people who look far enough, including life. no matter how hater he was of both russia and belarus and an extremely right person, he spoke for many years even before that he said that it should not be allowed. uh, let 's say the unification of russia and china needs them to separate, which was done for many, but here the stakes were raised high and

the west was sure that the main component here, he was sure that his sanctions pressure and the blow to russia could not be sustained. here, in my opinion, this is the edge. a school mistake , that is, by the twenty -third year russia should have completely stopped in development to fall apart into a component, and they broadcast this in all e on the media on various platforms. this is the mistake that the west had, they could not even imagine that any state is capable of withstanding such a powerful blow, and the next step is the reasonable steps of russia, the reasonable steps of belarus before these correct timely movement of the leadership. alexander grigoryevich lukashenko trip to china seat stump trip

to russia joint work of russia and belarus and we are slowly getting out of this tailspin. and what will happen to the west time will show the most interesting thing, what is history? doesn't teach anything . uh, once hitler was absolutely sure that he would destroy the country in the twentieth in 1991, whole lecture courses were passed around poland, which promised that by the twenty-fifth year russia would turn into 30 independent states. they really went with these lectures with maps and demonstrated it, but they forgot both the tanks in berlin and the cossacks in paris. yes, i really like it. here is an anecdote. yes, but still an information war. we lost. come on, well, in the meantime, it's not shy either, and it will come like a tank without brakes. let's speak directly about the possible entry of sweden and finland, it has already been announced, as if even the statement is written. yes, a union state. this greatly changes the configuration of forces in

the region in the northern region. here is the deployment of nuclear weapons on our territory , nuclear warheads on our territory. well, we also have iskanders. how many kilometers yes, and there i really like 500 km - this is what the russian claims. yes, for some reason, the americans write in separate articles that the range is possibly up to 2,000 km. well, it’s just that the rocket is not voiced differently. yes, and warheads may be other good joint moves. here belarus, russia, if you look like this globally, it is more than justified. yes , but where is it, if it is chess territory, to predict a variant in life, such moments when hasty forecasts did not lead to anything good. in our situation, well, we started with what, yes, two new nato members appear, but all these years they

were considered as potential adversaries. well, if not the republic and belarus , then the russian federation, my experience of communicating with russian colleagues is unambiguous. clearly talks about it, not considered. uh , the need to take into account the potential of these states in the face of god forbid, let's say a confrontation in this region and everything that these states did. so it's not legs. they were really ready to use their potential in the interests of nato. i am far from thinking that our russian colleagues do not take this into account, so it is impossible to talk about it as something new. further the entire infrastructure, er, these northern european states, it has long been adapted to the interests of the above for the transfer of forces and means. how many kilometers they advanced towards russia and

we will stop there for now. that's all and the question. how ready and willing are they to fight? maybe today they have a certain wariness that their political elites use to frighten russia once again and solve their problems for the people. it doesn't matter how the finns traveled, how they went to st. petersburg, but these countries are unlikely to want to fight. my logic tells me a little that it's one thing when you have a gun, and another thing when you take it out and start demonstrating it in front of waving his nose, his other. uh, let's say that at the opponent's in due time, the finnish war. it began precisely in order to push the threat away even from the same leningrad a little bit further away, despite, let's say , rather ambiguous results of this finnish winter company. well, the problem has been solved. here i would probably add

the following and we took into account the historical lessons of weapons on the territory of the republic of belarus, this is a real answer to the data. unfriendly steps towards the union state provocative pole supporter of zelensky rahami, yes, who participated in the initial once-peace talks, he said that the mobilization of men was apu. now it will be accelerated, i don’t really see the logic, but in your opinion, who are these statements designed for. and what’s real, maybe we can stand behind them, let’s start with the first one for whom these statements are designed for european partners and countries supporting ukraine, we demonstrate again in layers, even more we show that we are ready not only to fight with russia, but almost close all of europe own georgia

this is the first direction the second direction after all. eh, to pay tribute and i emphasized it again. uh, after all, zelensky is his own citizens, who also need to create the image of an enemy, because no matter how we say it, belarus has never had enemies for ukraine, including me, a person who spent quite a lot of years in ukraine and is associated with by this state. i can clearly say that there are sane people there. and today this escalation is an attempt. show that the country is on fire, the country is surrounded by enemies. and this idea should be hammered into the head of their own people so that they perceive themselves. uh, patriots of the country. they should supposedly, that is, the next war mobilization. such a powerful base is brought under it, such a truth. yes, why are you going to fight, because the country

is surrounded by belarusian enemies. they will come to you soon. although, to be honest, from a military point of view, well, the untrue is absolutely right, these statements cannot be connected with each other from a military point of view. you know, here's a good food team. yes, but this pr of his life there are already several hundred thousand ukrainians for a second, just so that we would not forget about it, yes, more and more often, however, i get the impression that the western world against the backdrop of the war in ukraine yes, it has already gone to pieces. here, although these and showing.