from i'm cutting off here's a scalp here or go. well , what gave this myth perfectly along with the hairs. it was cut off and that’s it, and it doesn’t affect the buyer at all, but to distribute, to whom how much to produce and to whom how much to sell? let it be called either a state order or a staff fund, there is no difference, but in order for these products to be 100% chosen by the funds, the countries revealed violations in the majority, a situation that is typical everywhere has been reported today to colleagues and kgk part of the crop is not in demand , the products are spoiled, and retail chains are not taken for sale potatoes and vegetables results control measures, uh, by local authorities . uh, they were often formally selected, and the storage of vegetables, uh, premises. in addition, the trading networks do not properly select and fulfill their obligations in sampling the volumes of fruit products that are defined in the contracts, while the trading

networks. uh, they import imported products, which are 3-4 times more expensive than our domestic one of the objective reasons for this situation of overproduction of potatoes and vegetables, and we produce a lot of products for us as much don't even need to. this is our export potential, so we need to diversify our markets. where to sell it plus process finished products, also to export and look at the shelf in our store among the regions of belarus minsk region the leader in the production of potatoes in the plans this season to get more than one and a half million tons of second bread by the way, farmers are focusing not only on marketable potatoes , but also on semyon le and in the countries of central asia, alexei kondratenko and yuri kornilovich agency and the fascists were expecting revenge, it became bloody for 43 years.

in the new series of the genocide project without the right to life, punitive operations against the civilian population and partisans, in the autumn of forty-second alone, the nazis burned more than a hundred villages and towns in thirty regions of the republic, in total , 65 punitive operations were carried out during this period, but the expected effect. they did not have the germans spared no one, in order to overcome the dangerous section of the road for them, the nazis covered themselves with the population in this way of those who managed to survive even in the arms of a shot mother distant villagers pants alive, threw papers, killed the people of the village are terrible, i can’t even cry you. every week , irrefutable facts from the materials and the prosecutor general's office dozens of punitive operations and the destruction of the belarusian people during the war years in the genocide project without the right to life. watch tonight, right after

the panorama of this, i say goodbye to you right now , understandable politics, let's remember the key initiatives of minsk to preserve peace , what kind of conflicts could not happen if the west heard the proposal of belarus and immediately after an understandable policy, the results of a sports day will be summed up by an iceman, do not switch. if you type on the internet the peace initiative of a politician in diplomats, interviews and appeals from the high tribunes of the belarusian diplomacy for more than a hundred years, all this time , peace has been an absolute value for it. today , our steps and actions are clearly and as accessible as possible in the program. what did she say to belarus , what did she propose , and what conflicts could not happen if the west wanted to finally hear why washington simply does not need peace today.

in

lukashenka's traditionally structured and clear message to the world of security, global security is cracking, you definitely can't hide your head in the sand. one must be on the alert to defend one's land and any attacks on independence, so that one does not make friends in the boots of a foreign soldier or a foreigner. we are set to cross our border. if this follows, we will respond symmetrically adequately. well, why use nuclear weapons if our fugitive banners are ahead of them, and behind them, that the first division that i said, where ours will already go as a target in belarus territory. we have enough other weapons to counter this. but, if we see that behind this lies the destruction of the world and our security, which is more than logical against the backdrop of an unprecedented increase in military threats, if

it’s hard to think about something else around , belarusians are used to the world, and it’s still great even , if for someone it has become a kind of banal reality, belarus well, maybe the only or one of the very few examples of the post-soviet space, where in the post-perestroika years there was e, the policy of memory implemented without conflict, and, of course, this is largely the merit of president lukashenko personally, because, looking around the perimeter. we see how the former soviet national republics, and without exception it was possible to observe, if not burning conflicts, there were many burning civil conflicts. what about this creeping confrontation, uh, non -life on june 25, 1945, belarus signed the un charter and

became a full-fledged subject of international law, yes, minsk was then part of the ussr, but everyone appreciated the contribution of our people to the common victory it is a pity that the memory of the west is selectively short. although even then washington was worried about its influence, and not about the general architecture of the world, the requirements of the soviet leadership, and the membership of the international organization 16 soviet usa expressed concern about this position of the soviet government. he stressed that it could not be accepted by the united states and other major countries, according to roosevelt, there was a danger to the implementation of the entire project to create an international organization, in other words, roosevelt was afraid that the united states would lose control over an organization that is just being created, but even he was forced to admit that for the onset of peace, belarus has done a lot. as a result, only two republics of the ussr became separate founders, we and ukraine, what happened to the second country, you know whose efforts, too, the expert community

in relation to belarus used in its depth the whole complex of belarusian, peaceful initiatives that we observed during the soviet period. this is justified, and the desire for peacekeeping understanding of security and stability as one of best values, but let's fast forward to the period of independent belarus only for the first years of independence. minsk has signed approximately 1,000 agreements, conventions , treaty protocols and memorandums. trying to live by the rules and respect partners in the nineties belarus for a meter. the network of nine missions, representative offices, 58 embassies and contacts has expanded to more than hundreds of countries. we have joined the osce and the brr euro-atlantic partnership council and many others. organizations with one goal to provide the architecture of the world to a rare foundation while alexander lukashenka has always adhered to a clear position of no wars of barriers and sanctions. here is

the famous speech of the president in istanbul at the osce summit, we are absolutely convinced that there is a conflict? 27 provisions of the european security charter, which speaks of preventive political rather than forceful means of resolving crisis situations, belarus is one of the few countries that , after the collapse of the ussr, did not shed a single drop of blood , unlike, for example, the conflicts in nagorno-karabakh yes, in the nineties and themselves it was hard, but the world above all in ninety the second, the osce minsk group was created to resolve the conflict between baku and yerevan, a year later the minsk group proposed a plan for an updated schedule, which was not accepted by either armenia or azerbaijan. nevertheless, they managed to stop the bloodshed by actively solving the problem, minsk tried along the line. at dkb. it is necessary to talk persistently urged the belarusian. a leader in his time, when, in my opinion, we

once again chaired the dcb. i took up this issue. i went to the kilchs and had a friendly talk with him. and i asked him a question so jokingly, i say ilhammed darish, well, we need to help armenia, if you agree, and it was about five and a half or six of these regions of the azerbaijani regions that were there. uh, as they stated it was captured by the armenians, the armenians admitted that this is not our land, it is azerbaijani, except for karabakh . well, or rather, it would have been returned, when i proposed to do this, these areas of the war would not exist. ilham would not have. well, roughly speaking, the motivation to start this war. well, you asked, probably, they gave away the status of karabakh, but they would decide calmly regime, but at the same time she did not agree to start their materials in the ninety-ninth, the young president of belarus, despite the actual threats of nato, flew to yugoslavia even under

the bombing of democratic missiles. the first was ready to support the people close to us, if only the war would end. it is interesting that nato military representatives not only did not guarantee security for the first time in belarus, but also sent fighter jets to meet then the belarusian president said in an interview with reporters that he arrived in serbia in hope. to bring closer the onset of peace in the country to destroy yugoslavia, minsk said, a unique combination of factors that has developed around, kosovo, the collapse of yugoslavia, ethnic cleansing and crimes against civilians, as well as a long period of administration of this territory by un structures, makes the case of outer space special, kosovo cannot be considered as a precedent for any other situation in today's world , the classic is different, after all , a few months later, when russia recognized

abkhazia and ossetia, george w. bush called this is a violation of international norms. already in 2010, when it became obvious that the west only wants vossolite from belarus. we have begun to actively build bridges to asia and create eas work along the lines of the sco, but peace must still be achieved together. as an example, the negotiations of the normandy four on ukraine in minsk, the negotiations took place in the palace of independence, the presidents of russia, ukraine, france and the german chancellor tried to reach an agreement for 16 hours, as a result, the parties agreed on february 15, 2015 in the minsk agreements, they decided to derail with a new round of conflict, minsk again invited them to negotiate, but the west is dictating something else now, and poroshenko and landa merkel, adjusting to the situation in unison, have hardened the absurd, we won time for ukraine, saying that no one really wanted peace, except for our country.

issues and prospects for the development of this ukrainian conflict, the ukrainian conflict, as well as the so-called external ukrainian president, well, just like the previous poroshenko, are controlled by completely different forces of this force. well, let's say are not uh forces associated with the european union with germany there with france with other guarantors of low agreements for more than 2 years, belarus provided a platform for the contact group on ukraine to receive criticism in return saying that minsk ignores human rights, but minsk did not snap back and was always open in the same year at us.