zero witen in the central match of the 19th round, all the guests' swords in the second half were scored by pavel the book one of the goals. he scored into an empty net. and one more goal on the account of evgeniy peremyatin, preparation for the playoffs. i 'll tell you so that we tuned in. eh, as if swimming to the final match, there was no special pumping. we knew who we were playing with. this is a multiple champion, cup winner, that is, a very serious team of s e s with a selection of football players of a very high level. tournament table belarusian cast iron is on the second place in five points from another club from gomel vrz, the third line behind the capital of vitamin iv next weekend will be held the twentieth tour de in the central game of fans waiting for the southern energy of the bcz. and more about the events, where already in our night air. so see you.

from the order of the chief of the operational headquarters of the security police and the sd risk commissariat

, an acute series of 1942, experience teaches that collective executions and burning of villages without the complete liquidation or eviction of their inhabitants and have bad consequences for us. beaver gruppenführer ss-bach provides the head of the sd team the right to decide to burn villages to destroy or evacuate their inhabitants? apply the most stringent measures against the local population with civilians acted according to the order. in november 1942, the reconnaissance of the local

partisan detachment monitored the road in the area of ​​\u200b\u200bthe village of the strip of the kirovsky district. soon, they could already observe how the inhabitants of the neighboring village were slowly moving in its direction, among whom were many children of elderly people. on both sides they were guarded by policemen. policemen fire at they didn’t open it to execution, it didn’t look like it. the partisans continued to observe soon, the situation became clear. it was a human shield. the nazis were hiding behind the population in order to overcome a section of the road that was dangerous for them; they were afraid of an attack on the convoy. but

no one was going to let people go. according to the materials of the general prosecutor's office, they were loaded onto cars and taken to a concentration camp in bobruisk, the village was burned, like the neighboring ones, only with people. from the testimony of galina's easter cake, german punitive detachments that herded the villagers into the school building and burned them down. there will be more people on this one to eat. we were immediately picked up and

seated. the genocide against the civilian population was associated not only with the fight against the partisans and their sympathizers, as evidenced by the documents developed by the nazis. a special method of their destruction. from the interrogation of the rodent vsevolod filaretovich, the former burgomaster of vitebsk on october 22 , 1945, the nkvd in the ussr the extermination took place mercilessly, where no one had seen in more distant from the city and the ways of communication points and more imperceptibly only in the autumn of the forty-second year, the nazis burned 100 villages and towns in more than thirty regions of the republic. bykovsky tolochin

ushachi other districts the village was burned down, and forty inhabitants were thrown into the grave alive. this is the village of ants. they drove people in, watered the villages, a terrible core , i can’t cry for you. in total, during this period , the nazis carried out 65 punitive operations against civilians and partizans, but the expected result. they did not have the nazis thirsty for revenge, it became bloody, 43 years old.

in december 1943, in the village of oryol , kobrin district, brest region , they were preparing for the christian holiday of st. anna, she was revered as an intercessor and patroness of all women. the war was a heavy burden on their shoulders, the germans did not spare anyone, hunger, life in constant fear for themselves. residents often saw how because of the forest, then on one side, then on the other. suddenly puffs of black smoke burst out, burned, a neighboring village. trouble, bypassed them

suddenly heard the sounds of approaching cars, and soon the house began to smell gary their house was already on fire. grab a still sleeping child, wrap it in a blanket and run out into the street. the village was on fire. one shot for the second women was just a little short of reaching the forest. satisfied with what he had done, a fascist with squeamishness, in which

something was swarming how hamok managed to survive in the memoirs of maria ivanovna, she turned out to be the same child who was left lying in the snow near her murdered mother. her grandmother told her about what happened in their village on that terrible day. naturally, like burning houses, everyone is trying to run away somewhere to hide, my mother and another daughter-in-law ran out, took me in her arms, quickly wrapped me in a blanket, and she herself, in one blouse , ran to the swamp in the direction of gorodets , there in the direction of pinsk, but the german noticed and began to scribble on them with a machine gun and that’s it two corpses lie. now and that's it, yes, so i

saw a german, something swarming there, so he came closer. he sees that two women, two corpses are lying and a child is swarming about there. well, he went to the village. in one of the houses where the german went, there were relatives of the deceased woman. i his fart. and my grandmother immediately realized that it was me and she was screaming. this is my my childhood, and he was then on her and began to drive so that she would take away, after all, he did not shoot me. the nazis destroyed every settlement , everything disposed to this

, a railway passed nearby, near the forest river. atrocities and ukrainian nationalists as they were called bandera? this is how people were killed and hanged. all. well, upsetting people for nothing. even my godmother’s mother, it was my husband who was killed, not like my husband, but with a friend they beat me with barbed wire until they were surprised. everything to them it was the same as scoffing that they fall. the information that came to the name of the country's leadership about the atrocities against civilians in the occupied territories during the punitive operations became more and more alarming to the destruction

of the population in the occupied territories. the nazis attracted more and more new forces from stalin's special folder, a document signed by the people 's commissar of internal affairs of the union of the ussr, moreover , antonov top secret in the vileika and deep districts, the germans are forming polish and belarusian detachments. in the vileika district, german commandant's office partisans sent the population to germany, arson of villages and other repressions of the civilian population. from us there many houses burned down there and grandmother's. let's go and see, and here she was upset, as we looked. even now, the earth was moving all over , it was somewhere with the living. the year 1943 became

the year of 60 large-scale punitive operations for the civilian population. they involved significant forces of the nazis , a motorized formation of aviation tanks, for each of them there were huge victims belarusian peoples. hello. thank you for being with us and welcome the guests of this edition as well. today, we are waiting in the studio of the famous russian writer, tv presenter

leonid mlechin, but let's start with loud vladimir putin was the phrases of the deployment of nuclear weapons in belarus blew up the information front. let's start with this question and start, probably, and tell for those who still do not understand. and why do we need russia to say so, even a union state. it is such that, in general, the use of soft soft war of force, that is, so far only deployment of russian tactical nuclear weapons, well, after all, in some. well, you yourself said some led to hysteria, and some of the head and studied. and in this regard , it is of great importance for us today. here is one division near the kaliningrad region, the second division near grodno is being formed in poland poland is increasing its armed forces almost twice and again asking the united states to deploy tactical nuclear weapons

that these are tactical nuclear weapons that will be used on our territory and used. maybe, maybe the six states of europe - there are not enough of these nuclear weapons, and aviation above and, let's say , some types of artillery, let's say they are sharpened for this today. and it's been there for over 40 years. why we cannot have nuclear weapons on our territory, although it will still be under the jurisdiction of the russian armed forces, this must also be understood. just when they started to say that belarus has become nuclear neighing. this is wrong. it's not so absolute. we can use these nuclear weapons. let's just say that with the redaction. uh, the russian side on the other side. the russian federation has repeatedly stressed that if some enemy troops

enter the territory of belarus, then if it suddenly needs to be protected by all means , the russian federation has never hidden that all these means, but they imply by default. what if, of course, god forbid such a scale implies a nuclear shield. it also becomes an application. well let's say so the nuclear umbrella over belarus just became closer and lower. alexei and why is there such a reaction after all? and so nervously excited, after all, vladimir putin alexander lukashenko has said more than once in recent months that guys, if you continue to violate understanding in the same way. yes, well, we need to support san ivanovich in that part that over the past 30 years, but he did nothing else, as he concentrated his forces and means on our borders on the borders of the union state. and this concerns not only uh belarus this also applies to

the pskov region of the leningrad region. we must understand very well that, and this is not just being done by nato - it is, their strategic plans are oriented, and which are unconditional. e hmm connected with the fact that at some point in our weakening to seize the kaliningrad region and, uh, our western ones. e area. we have talked about this more than once, of course, but certainly. uh, they give the nato command to washington , london, at some stage, decide. for this operation, but the presence of tactical nuclear weapons completely destroys their plans. why do they only make one step on our territory, the application of tactical nuclear weapons completely destroys this entire group within literally a few minutes there. yes, and then the meaning after uh, all these

gestures. further there will be only peace negotiations. moreover, with the position of what position, uh, that they are aggressors, naturally, they should not only withdraw their troops, but also create that security zone that putin spoke about, that is, from here such nervousness, which hinders the implementation of their plans , and, you know, how they come to investors with their business plan, and this business plan tries to implement them, and of course they finance their ideas. and when these ideas fail to materialize, that is, it is natural that investors will ask. this political elite and where is the result, where is the result that you captured uh, or weakened? uh, there will be no result for russia, yes, and of course, and why are they nervous, because in the near future all this political lithium, which is now in power. she will have to answer to, and those who financed them.

well, in the sense of very specific terms in this interview, vladimir putin called, and i, probably, the final answer for those abroad, who, as before, probably thought that lukashenka putin was bluffing when they say that when it comes to on national security, the people themselves , no one will joke and will respond by all possible means andrey what do you think is this a reaction? here is the solution. eh, some see that i see three of them changing, as they work against us. that is, anyway. probably they are planning no, straight military behavior. but as a hybrid operation. like, for example, the capture of the border region. see who they are ready for. these are extremist terrorists, local people. generally. those who know the specifics there know the language and what we saw, for example, in the bryansk region, this is training. here are bergs who can enter the area to capture it, and then we allegedly will not be able to use this territory. here such weapons. that is, with regard to poland. yes, this is a permanent containment, so that we keep our troops there and thus divert forces to the polish direction. and now this problem is solved. that is, if we have such a tactical weapon, then we can throw more resources on

some other sector. for example, if there are problems on the southern border, and if we talk about such an attack, it can only be combined, that is, on the one hand, these people are doing this, and on the other hand, they are doing it. this is what they are, they are also not cancers, they consider nasheeds unconditionally. as for the applications, well, let's say it is how it should be, let's say it is prepared from the repository, then it reunites it with a demolition and only after that it is used. that is, they say, here are the signs we do not see, so do what you want, in fact, the reaction is quite calm. at least what we will be according to the americans. this means, they think that apparently, either we will not use it after all, or, if we use it, then they will be able to somehow either get ahead of us, or there it is foreseen. but so far, apparently, they do not have such a situation, how critical. most likely, when we were still changing the constitution, they were already a savior. this is also very important, because by doing so they show russia. so she completely trusts us , the situation in the country is controlled. this is not the 20th year, when it is not clear what would happen, that is, we can even place such types of weapons here. and this is a good signal from the west, including, that is, look here here is the full controller yulia

konstantinovna well, this shows again 4 the republic of belarus and the russian federation have reached such a truly strategic partner. we are completely trusted once we have trust or nuclear weapons, and under the control of the russian federation only with the order of the main team of the russian federation, but nevertheless, it would be a union state that has been moving towards the implementation of such strategic important programs for a long time. uh, which would show that we are very close. well, this is such a very real step, many experts are talking about it, which really strengthened our cooperation. shows that we are really strategic partners. now , uh, more and more. it's kind of a step forward, after all, these are moved pieces that demonstrate that we are. for all that, we keep u trying to find. uh, attack us. let him try, if you remember the words of the president as early as the second of july, i have the twenty-second year. on the eve of independence day at a solemn meeting. he said that this topic appeared immediately

after the poles turned to the americans for the last time and asked them to bring them nuclear weapons to poland, this was discussed in detail, and then alexander lukashenko spoke to the president. putin said. and why do we pretend that nothing is happening? this is a very logical question. this time and in fact, according to the words of the russian federation, that is, the last step was that they were going to supply weapons to ukraine with a united iran. that is, it was in the soviet union of the russian federation that there were all nuclear weapons, nothing was done with and including from the republic of belarus. united states what nato did not do, that is, we return those positions that we will have a statement for the british minister of defense, which really stirred up, which became a trigger for the parties to articulate their nuclear plans more intelligibly. here is the decision to supply shells with combined uranium to ukraine , and here is what you see behind this, first of all , about the features. you have already figured out all

the features of shells. eh, it's all been googled. that's what is interesting about trying to call tensions absolutely absolutely practically. yes, they can deliver it, but they can also deliver it. so what? it doesn't change anything. well, you say that infecting something else in ukraine will not change anything. absolutely nothing will change the question, it will only be that, it seems to me, here it is even more necessary to take ecological, forcing. after all, the best black earth is ukraine, yes, but the fact is that, uh, with a conventional projectile. yes, when using it, uranium dust. and this territory becomes infected and, moreover, is born per thousand years.

simply in this case, we can say that there will be just literally large areas of contamination, that is, such people 's lands, ukraine yes, in the ukrainian chernobyl they do not have such radioactivity, but in any case they are no longer suitable for use in agriculture, the defeat of human power and goes. eh, people still sigh from the uranium dust. here, besides the fact that, in principle, destruction, yes, that is, he is on his own well, at the moment he understands that these shells are mainly used, they pierce e thickness uh, 40 cm. yes, armor or reinforced concrete structures, that is, in reality they are, where they can be used either against e heavy taxation, but this is not currently used on the territory of ukraine or opposite uh, reinforced concrete structures, these are bunkers, yes, but the question uh, the other

is that and how many of these, uh, the uk itself has these shells, there are not so many of them, uh, and uh, these technologies. if i speak correctly, if anything, alexander ivanovich rules. it's right in the sixties. in the years 60-70 they began to be used, that is, in fact, we can say that the uk is once again, like all nato countries, trying to get rid of its own. well, uranus, the actual control of the equipment itself, is being disposed of in ukraine , and this weapon, outdated, is very expensive processes in order to dispose of these ammunition. and so, and gave them to them, they used them, infected the territory, but the infection of the territory was correctly said - this is what it says about the fact that great britain and the collective west, in principle, already understands what im a. will leave ukraine i on the territory with

fertile soil, if they move away, that is, of course, all grain transactions will stop, or before, and will continue to operate. eh, aside. naturally, russia or there towards turkey yes, and by no means are western corporations that currently own most of the fertile land. in ukraine, the net profit on this will not receive its jackpot. this is actually, but an attempt, but to write off these lands and tell their own e capitalists investors that, you see we don't give them away just like that. it may be that, including these statements about the supply of shells in modern uranium, this is a sign that ukraine is preparing some kind of decisive battle. well, i would say about what, when they hit the zaporizhzhya station on the cooling table there, that is, it was much more dangerous, that is, it was the pollution of the environment. here it could have. somehow well, i don’t know, yes,

a quarter of europe is there, or up to half in a bad scenario. and of course, the fact that they use these wound cores - it's really not enough that it changes, plus more yes, it's not clear the volumes regarding the decisive battle. well, probably, we will consider even further there the statement that the americans made the day before, that is, well, they are engaged in, i would say, such disinformation, because if you are planning something, you must keep it all a secret, or deceive the enemy. but they, of course, play all the time. you are talking about this statement, and the adviser to the commander-in-chief in court , the pledged american dan rice, who said. i believe it's spring near ukraine there will be a very powerful counteroffensive, which is shocking. i specifically looked at the full text of this statement, which means that there, for example, the figures require 25,000 in russia supposedly. this means that in a series of dead and 75,000 wounded per month, that is, 100,000 each, russia loses. well , if there are 500 or 400,000, it turns out a grouping, you can destroy it in 4 months. if you believe such a statement, that is why we should believe that there will be a decisive battle. here they are ready. and if you look, here. he is not this adviser

advises, there his tasks are to travel to collect information, what are you, what is happening, these are the controllers who sit there and, after all , the comrades who are there in the media are processing. he is still this, like his coach, yes, that is, he is a specialist in leadership. he motivates them. yes, there is a young army in this case. in fact. they say that the composition of the commune there is 40, and he is even 35 years old. that is, all of them who served in the soviet army were thrown out of the army, because they may not be loyal, or they studied there in russia somewhere. here we take the youth. well, well done does. everyone there also saw someone who cuts out their eyes, someone shoots prisoners, that is, this is, unfortunately, if this is behavior. i think too. it is, as it were , provoked somewhere by american specialists there or by british ones. here they are more of a propagandist, that is, these things are informational. yes, they always have it and it works as dirty as possible, so it is necessary for advisers to divide these statements into two. i believe that, firstly, we need to listen to russian statements, what will tell russia what they are signs of an offensive there say that yes, they specifically say that there are signs of a concentration of troops in large cities. yes? well, again, well against. all this calculates, that is, you can

collect something there, you can then disperse it. this is the game all the time, who will deceive whom, so you should not believe everything that they write, what i say, the decisive battle. many say that something will definitely be decided this spring. well, the american american adviser to the commander-in-chief is all right, what a counter-indicative moment. but how are you? you see the situation will be something like this there will be nothing or no breakthrough actions. i don't see it there today. russia keeps only 150,000 mobilized in reserve. so they mobilized 300,000. yes, well, 150,000 were brought into battle, and 150,000 are on the second and on the third line. this, you probably understand, that is, in any case, all those two corps that are preparing the apu. ukraine there uk from germany and so on. they will just collide, let's say, three e on the three lines of defense. inside leni defense, and after

that it will be systematically destroyed, that is i am today, therefore i will not speak for the russian general staff, but it seems to me that, after all, russia is determined to simply systematically grind the enemy’s manpower and military equipment. that's the situation was, too, will not lie. but there is a key offensive rule called 1:6. if you want to attack, then your grouping should be six times larger, that is, the apu, but in reality it should be in fact. how many if three 300 x 6 more than a million 1.5 million people should be and plus not a person only and also weapons military equipment. and where it is it is not, therefore, all those who graduated from military schools are great for our viewers, and we see how constantly leopards go there, that the plane has already been trained by tankers in the uk. training is decided by the live, yes, or are there

some kind of planes being flown there? who is czech or some dictionary? uh, the crews are pilots? well, this is not for a massive offensive. it doesn't mean anything, it's all burned in there. u for several days u massed artillery shelling, yes information that some of them decided to desert and went through the final situations only these situations. you know, the worst thing. we can, of course, here, uh, exaggerate a little, laugh at these numbers, but it is important to remember what the statement was made that week by the polish, and the military, that a is in reality, if the situation worsens. and then we, a, will have to step in, i mean, yes, i said go go go. in france, they then tried

to rewind to say that he didn’t mean it, but the bird flew out and pulled it on, what does he say, about what? why, in fact, they provide that the mechanism of the war proxy is when the ukrainians themselves. you nast, uh , the armed forces are the size of the army, and the quality of the composition, which means, uh, they provide that, in order not to lose e to russia, they will be forced to lead nato troops. yes, and in principle, they are already nato troops in the form. here are the crews. uh, nato countries yes, it is, if open, uh, the start of hostilities by nato on the territory of ukraine is already open transfer. e personnel departments there, then what it says is everything is already the use of not only tactical nuclear weapons of all types of weapons in order to contain this open absolutely espionage business, which they are but as they say to the enemy. just there on the knee, and

they dragged the belarusians there. and now it's getting bigger and bigger. it is clear why they are doing the flow of activity, the spy network organized by russia will continue. we need to make sure that all participants identified are held accountable. and andrey, don't you think that sounds like it. uh, so they keep going, of course. look at belarus well, there, as it were, things continued, that is, literally glorification. they are already declaring that this is what we have, which means that they have restrained us. it's some kind of intelligence. here these here i am, as it were, belarusian spies, a week passes already there, military counterintelligence detains two more spies. one russian, one belarusian, and all zharin. he says yes, there are about twenty people there. these are the spies that we fished out there during the start. and here's what they show, what you see. we work so cool and see, they cook there, everything is done falls. and just arrived there. this means that the current king of great britain , that is, also, apparently, was talking about something, they, that is, most likely, that an international fund is being created to receive any new aggressive statements.

well, as for spies, of course, we were all very surprised that there were six ukrainians, three belarusian oppositionists all together, they worked for russia, it turned out that even in the polish media how they presented this situation, that there, it turns out, some kind of spies with east, without indications of nationality, because if you say something ukrainians, the next step is how we filter, how we accept them, what they do here in general. well, society does not know this yet, they do not throw it up. that is, apparently, the matter is still sewn with threads, because the first step in this case is not to bark at belarus that we are bad here, but to filter our ukrainians, in which you accepted a million people there. here, look for spies there. no need to buy here. our countries have always been here for so long, even the cold war had spy scandals different, but e spy in reality its importance or significance is determined by its access to one or another. uh, some nominal employees who are just unambiguous. here you will be here. you have a belarusian passport, will you be spies? yes,

why? and, because you were somewhere near a kaleika, you passed by railway stations, that's why you will, yes, you will be spies, well, of course, all sane people are not just experts, but simply citizens of poland and europe in general should understand that , well yeah, it's a big self-presentation evidence. look, here was the case , we had all the evidence. here's what the body was shown to you, they all took reports. mm, state security officers. they tell you how it all happened. there is not a single intelligible comment here. well, what those people comment on is just laughter, you can’t see that, well, why are the poles today allowed to do this, given that we are seeing what was happening just a genocide with migrants, when it’s smaller, this runaway soldier who unfortunately it ended badly but he spoke very much. a lot of things, how they simply destroyed, shot, detain

foreign citizens without showing any evidence. and silence. not a single human rights activist, not a single fighter for human rights. even the genus will not open. why are they now allowed to go under martial law there, they have a new district emergency number, that is, they do not work there. not the media or any human rights activists, yes, the second moment, well, look, they are using an action, in principle, an american one. that is, in mexico there is the same wall, an iron fence. so there it is not guarded by troops, regular ones, but such rivers were pulled out of work from somewhere. there for two weeks. they rotation there are what they were doing. they drink there, so they fight all sorts of hazing. and, of course, you can still hunt people from here. phones are taken away. as migrants told money, someone is thrown away and beaten. that is, there is no discipline as such, so, of course, yes. there is the same clear picture of the regime itself. yes, they are turning into real traffickers, which means the minister internal affairs kamensky said. uh, the belarusian side received an even signal that while they are in prison

, the border crossing in the beaver forests will be closed. if pochem will be released tomorrow, the day after tomorrow the passage in the beaver forests will be opened. well, that's what it is like not trading will not make money in the evening chairs in the morning. well , it’s like there will be no money and it doesn’t matter if it doesn’t exist. you know the fact is that today these are the positions of the polish authorities. well, let's say they are so russophobic belarusian, as you wish, but they are ruled by only one hate. you see, this is hate. i don’t know, she grew up, of course, the old days. she is constantly felt, but today, as you know, she has grown like a mushroom, and she does not forgive them and is wrong. but we are still our closest neighbors. and we must clearly draw the line between the current political regime in poland and the local population and say that these are two. well, fundamentally different groups necessarily. i’ll tell you here, i worked

for many years in brest, i’ll tell you that the relationship border groups of the population and the polish belarusian, they are very warm and, let's say , well restrained by the economic component. yes, that's why they have a polish policy here, let's say the poles, uh, their leadership. not, of course, not shared by a significant group that is supported. well, we also have to watch the demand, but the population and uh, the political summer of today. in poland, these are generally different concepts and they have different values ​​​​from the russian federation, yes, that is, but at the same time , lithuania again accuses the republic of belarus of loads since closed crossings went through cast overcrowded borders. they can’t figure it out in any way, this is a separate

conversation. that is, we must definitely start, because it is not without reason. that's even when some holidays. eh, official state events take place, then the president of the republic of belarus congratulates the people. yes, that is, to the people, because we understand perfectly well that, yes, the people choose their own government. and how it chooses is also a separate conversation, but these are people who are very much in many ways. that part of the population which understands that everything that happens, and it concerns ordinary people, it's just that consumers are people of citizens of this state. only from the side that someone wants. uh, how to prolapse their interests or declare their interests , our viewers agree to declare their rights. the fact is that our programs are watched on the internet, including those who live in poland now and they periodically. that's just what they pay attention to. here in your comments here , under almost every video, you can find an interesting comment. he must be alone

of many under video with an interview with a famous russian blogger dmitry puchok recorded last below, they don’t want to fight with russians , who are not our warriors in general , they treat russians normally, but very many do not know the truth, since there is only one horse in polish tv russian channels all are disabled. and many more are intimidated. they even want to hear the truth, they are afraid to talk on the phone on this topic, they only complain about the increase in prices for everything, alas, such a situation that what we are talking about is blocked access to the information channel, that is, there is no diverse information is pumped only that which is beneficial in order to provoke negative attitudes, both towards russians and all the same people find sources find an understanding that it is necessary to consider various aspects of this issue and cool our heads to think that we are still people . we are neighbors, how to say? yes, the neighbors do not choose, and we continue to live, when you all this is over, sooner or later it will move to another. stage into another phase, but to live there and remain

people, we will have to trade to work meet to travel, that is, the transparency of the borders of the movement of labor capital and the entire international economy is built here on this free movement. eh, and so to speak normal relations built. yes. yes , we monitor a little what they are doing there, but in fact there are people somewhere. yes, but flushing from capital, that is, children there are older courses of universities, for example, there the senior school is being prepared specifically for the war. here it was not. the last one was there for three or four years. but the legal justice party, apparently, did i bet on such militarization, which we see even in youth movements, which in poland are also very powerful there, it’s not belarus , there are some football fans there, and that’s it. there really are politicized groups that are influential, who hold their own territory there. and these are the nationalists. they are very aggressive, that is, in ukraine. we saw how in 8 years you can grow this spotted meat, which is absolutely, in general, convinced , ready to fight in separate divisions, the same thing, apparently, is in poland. therefore, yes people older generation, because even the ukrainian army.

that the bet is made just this young generation is easier to work with, it’s easier to manage, and, probably , as the gebbez said, yes , you can make a herd of pigs out of any nation, but in a couple of years and with the help of the media, and smith, the polish ones are also soaring, of course they do the washing. if we see stories about belarus there , there are paddy wagons driving through the streets there, which means that they report that 30,000 people in prisons necessarily show gas with water cannons, that is, not the situation that is real today, but that was there 2 years ago. this picture is present all the time. the academy of sciences has published data from socio-polls, and the priorities of belarusians in foreign policy are the predictability of the union state in the first place. e with the russian federation in second place. belarusians. we set the development of relations with china we see that there are fewer and fewer supporters of a neutral policy. yes, for a long time we thought that this is our business card, there are fewer and fewer supporters, and belarusians are absolutely right about unfriendly countries. usa baltic states. and poland, that is, those our neighbors, with whom for a long time quite well. e. there were that in general

lithuania does not have enough for a secretary. antonio gutarios traveled to brussels to deliver a simple message to eu leaders to stop world hunger. how, having ensured the delivery of russian and belarusian fertilizers in developing environmentally friendly losses to support their ports, but no, the lithuanian politicians of this quote intend to oppose exceptions and sanctions for belarusian fertilizers, which are being discussed in the european union , prime minister shamanites said that the president of lithuania must not accept any derogations at the european council. who bit our neighbors, what kind of rabid dog? you correctly defined very clearly, this uh russian verb, yes, to earn. yes, they had the opportunity to earn money, but for some reason they refused, but because , er, there is some kind of alternative, but they do not earn money, but receive some kind of subsidies , primarily from the united states of america , it is difficult to earn money. yes, it is necessary to negotiate with the belarusians. it must be concluded

contracts. and it is necessary to ensure the reloading of our gauge fertilizers of the river from the funds and say compensate us for this and they receive the sanctions that have been introduced, and against belarus since the twentieth year. e through the blocking of the port infrastructure. it certainly is. subsequently. uh, it should have been compensated from non-governmental or other funds, uh, which are engaged with washington, or with london in a different way, this is not well, it's pressing faster. click this deal, take the sun off. it's common sense, after all. common sense always prevails sometimes. uh, only in such an intellectual game. and when he does, he will make a movement, uh, not some, but processes, but in reality, until we, uh, most importantly, see the liberation, uh, of the baltic countries and

poland from occupation by the united states of america yes, because that we have just discussed what we have to admit, that our neighbors are in the regime of occupation, by the way, our main question about returning to ourselves will be the message of the president to the people of parliament. this is always a key event , attention is always riveted to it, and this year we see that even the speed of events and the situation. well, she's just in the war in the country, we pay attention to it. here are your expectations from this message, if there are any or concepts at all, of course. uh, this message is real. e will be at a time when the installation is changing, every minute every second no stability. we don't see it today. and this message, as it were, as an annual message, will outline some particular strategic priorities, moreover, like me. i hope it will again affect all aspects of life, like our international relations, including naturally our internal problems, our internal aspirations of our people. well, what do we expect from this.

i think that this will be such a good analysis of the international situation, our place in this world and the prospects for our movement forward in this very unstable world, but in the world in which we must live and develop , the last message was remembered for the fact that the president was very frank. yes , a very frankly departed moment. yes, here this general narrative, which is even classical. well, i don’t know the style of presenting this message, i asked belarusians three key questions. i propose now to recall this fragment, and then we will return to the current ones, please. my first question is he is not the most ready are you belarus for this dear name of independence are you ready? be

initiative work, are the belarusians today ready to break away for real, to get rid of putting a task in front of their family and work at least for themselves. and everything else that we saved the state. and as soon as we use this internal potential of our people, every belarusian is involved. we will shake the president twice. well, if there were three questions, then in 2 years we received three answers, that is, principles. yes , we see that we are quite united, that many things have been overcome, which were still in the twentieth year. well, the truth remains problems, of course, how without it, well, of course, to handle the message. and even when it started to be a little delayed all the time, people already

feel so little anxiety. and why? how about in russia remember putin's message was also postponed. in connection with the military operation, that is, people are sitting there with notebooks. this is also important. if it's not just like it, our transfer. yes , something else is popular, this is green such a synchronization of clocks within the task, of course, of course, since we have the president in the vertical of power. he always does it. so somewhere impro.