maybe so was going to call me then says, well, it's somehow too frightening, maybe actually scared. you know, i was shocked, because i was in kazakhstan, but not long before these events, for me, kazakhstan, which i have not written about for the first time, has such strong instability in this very dangerous region. in the same place, everything around is burning and the audience wrote to me boiling. i asked them what was going on. i saw the chronicle. i read it and i was completely shocked. i think we need to understand how this can happen. well, how is it in one in a second it could all happen. but, to be honest, when i flew there, i was sure that there was already a sea of ​​people of my colleagues who were already finishing these books. it turned out that i wrote the first book about what happened in kazakhstan, i talked with dozens. e law enforcement officers. and i saw what happened there, i was shocked. you know, at some point there was a feeling that i was in stalingrad, this building of the city akimat of the city government, just burnt

, i stood there while we were setting up the equipment. i stood there for 20 minutes he was shocked, alma-ata could not come into his head, wonderfully, the southern beautiful city. and this is what happened. how could this happen, how this thin film of civilization flies off people, they turn. god knows what i wanted to tell about this, but then i think that in general, but in the republics, to which we were together recently. we know very little, we really believe it. yes, it's a problem that it seems to us that you know and understand everything, but this is not so, because, of course. every nation has its rich most interesting story. she came, and then in kazakhstan, then in kazakhstan, an interesting new president , an outstanding politician from my point of view, very curious, i have known him for a long time. it seems to me that they do not underestimate him and do not understand him, which means that i wrote a biography about him. he is the son of a front-line soldier

, you know for me it was of great importance his father came from the front on crutches, and his uncle his father's brother died at the front. and his father, it turns out, did not believe until the last that his brother was dead and told his son that maybe he had a concussion. he's in the hospital somewhere and we need to find him. only much later they found a grave, where he died, and his uncle is so important to me, it is of great importance from an informatician, but there is also a solid interesting character and then in general kazakhstan about how people live there, what they think, how they see the world . i think it's very important to be able to tell a lot of parallels at all. that's what happened in kazakhstan, they began to talk about minus 2020, which they say is according to the same patterns. the same methodology. so, when you worked, did you find these parallels, or is it separate? history, fucking, to be honest, i 'm afraid of a parallel now i'll tell you why, in principle, there is even such a section in the science of historical corporatism. and compare historical situations. somehow i don’t,

because i see the hand of people in everything. here is the figure of people. i am history. now, over the years, i began to see through the biographies of people without without through e, the main figures. well, in my youth, since we all lived in the soviet union there, the role of the individual in history was rather limited. and what is it that the people decide everything, and those gradually i came to the conclusion that everything depends on these figures, and the figure is different everywhere, people are different, so i need to understand what i need in each situation very well. you sometimes think that you have a pattern. he will help you in everything, no, in history, in what is happening around us. we must understand each situation. so tonally. that's perfect. you need to understand exactly. i'll have to look into it, maybe i'll find the time. well, you don’t have to feel sorry for him, this applies to our brother with you, because sometimes we were in a hurry quests a little. this criticizes us and rightly we must admit, in principle, to

this essence of a journalist. you have to be first with us. the other side is that people want to understand what's really going on. it is clear that in the years of my youth, in order to find out what happened, i had to wait until tomorrow, and my grandfather sent me for newspapers. so, when he began to get the mailbox . i brought it. true, he was now reading messages on your phone that any date had happened to me, god forbid , the plane crashed there, he took a picture. you you know, well next arises, the main people want to understand. and why did he fall design poor fueling prosperity weather terrible pilot error , this is where professional journalists are needed who know how to work, where to go to pilots to testers to the creator of design aircraft and so on professionals who will carry out the necessary analytical work and present. and what do you think, you managed to call. after reading the book, we can

draw such a conclusion. what do those events in kazakhstan teach us that kazakhstan will teach us all. well, i gathered all the information i could gather. well, that's all, he knows only in today's world and earthly beings are limited, and i formulated for myself what is happening and stated throughout the book how i see it very interesting to the reader. maybe agree with me or disagree, but i'm not talking unfounded. i state. here are the facts that happened people's opinions what i learned and offer to see the picture, i do not offer my conclusions, because the audience. as you can see here are the main reasons maybe preconditions for something to happen. and what does kazakhstan need or has already done to prevent this from happening again? and a variety of people who want to carefully read this book came together, but isn’t it appearance , well, in any case, what i was told in kazakhstan

is about internal events, but kazakhstan was very lucky that there was a person at the head of the country who showed his determination to his will, in general, underestimated, only he is an intellectual diplomat. there was a very soft man completely crush thought, quite right. it turned out absolutely it turned out to be incredible determination in him, his assistants there, close people tell me that the situation is when god knows what is happening there. not a second of doubt not a second of any unrest of anxiety. uh, in peace, complete in full possession of the situation correctly made a decision including a decision, and seek help from the organization of contracts absolutely exactly absolutely exactly. i remember some crazy comments. all this gives the country into the power of the invaders. everything means the end of the country. what a madness profit under control strategic facilities airfields ammunition depots power plants, what was the point

, as i understand it, the first thing in the whole world saw that president tokaev and the state authorities were in place and recognized by the allies by the communities , this immediately knocked out. uh, moving in, uh, the second troops of the kazakh security services were able to hand over the duty. uh, colleagues because of the dkb sit down to point home, having completed the task perfectly perfectly from my point of view. it's just. this story will go in. after all, we are observing that now the breed of western politicians. well, macron schultz and sunak e fondalein, that is, it seems to me that they can’t even say that they are not leaders, but managers. and the state is like a corporation. really? we won't see it there again. i don’t know, nicolas, neither the new shirak, nor thatcher, for some time the scale of the tasks facing the head of some western european state is not difficult for him to raise the tax there by 1.2% or

for one make a whole 0.3% retirement age. there, as in france, it will increase the scale of tasks to 65 or to 64. e was not so large-scale, not demanding strong politicians, it was about such very simple things. it's just different times now. i think it will. although on the other hand. you know, this is how we are, when we look at history, we see bright figures, but we forget that they were not always there and not everything was filled with bright ones, i already say they were not bright bright ones. unfortunately, such outstanding figures capable of changing time are not so easy, for example, and it seems that you are watching this side, or maybe, we will say this, that there is, for example, either another breed, or some other league. putin lukashenko, that is, they are not even in charisma, in physiognomy, in manners, fussy, yes, that is, there is readiness. as you say, how do you

remember the loudspeakers, than the managers, there are leaders of heads of state, and they are of different caliber. and the task. today we have a common global world and we have a common task before us. i think that the politicians whom you spoke of initially faced such large-scale tasks that the europeans had not had for a long time. it just wasn't there. you know how the demand for it was. well, i don't think so more than i had demand there was no need. well, let's look there two or three years ago. there four five years ago, the scale of the problems. well, the european continent is very different. well, really. as you rightly say , everything is there to manage, but there was no need to make major political decisions, but they did not appear. right now. well, let's look at such large-scale figures, like. here , too, you know, if i remember that i was a daughter, but were outstanding figures born? no , unfortunately, not at all outstanding figures. on in fact, you don’t often want

to think here, that is, they don’t ask a question for a high-profile headline. namely. maybe we and the audience think together with you. if you look back at our history, you can highlight some mistake number one or catastrophe number one, which, like a bifurcation point, parted us in a different direction. we could be somewhere else. you know, i think that the seventeenth year and i, with firm conviction, have already written more than one book about this and made enough historical films. i think that if they were the events of the seventeenth years, we would now live on the sidelines with a population of 300 million people, but in a prosperous country, and the russian empire at the beginning of the twentieth century was one of the five most diverse states. we would now go to the top five most different. we would not have lost so many people, we would not have gone through such monstrous trials. we would live now about events that have long been flourishing in a prosperous country for a long time,

there were catastrophes in the seventeenth year. well, in fact, if we have not entered the first world war, this is further rewinding back, if peter, of course, stolypin in 911, would not have been killed in the kiev theater. he would have remained the head of the state. he would not have allowed russia to enter the first world war, there would not have been the first world war , there would have been no events of the seventeenth year, and russia at the beginning of the 20th century developed rapidly and economically politically spiritually, after all, ah. silver age. this is the heyday of incredible art here in belarus , by the way, the incredible development of painting. here is an outstanding master, alive, 52 centuries golden ki. if i may, so to speak, here, right here, and the revolution got in the way. they would be here, that's all they did, they would all stay here, they all dispersed, fled and disappeared,

so for me the event of the seventeenth year is a turning point, but disastrous for russia in russia, i mean, not in the ethnic sense, the russian empire state in which we all lived together. yes, my ancestors are from everything, yes from belarus summing up, maybe the conversation and not boldly delay it to you anymore, what colors does it draw? you know i true, in this sense they are very careful, but i would like to hope that i can still write a book about how we ended up with these turbulent times and then try to figure out how it all happened? well, i hope i get the opportunity. thank you very much for participating in our program. let me remind you that our guest was a wonderful journalist writer. and tv presenter leonid mlechenko. thanks for being happy with us. we confidently walk into the new

day and do it to our own music, the music that sounds inside each of us. everywhere in the sun in not timid, movements at our fingertips, music inspires , makes us think and opens up thousands of roads before us.

the biathlete men's bronze relay of the championship of russia ended the season on the eve of the joint competition became a very good alternative to the first post of the olympic year, but more serious loads will follow and i would like more serious resistance from the international biathlon federation while extending sanctions, but in general in the world of sports. at least in words for our society does not depend on whether it will be unpopular, i’ll say whether he is with a flag or without a flag, the president is dissatisfied with the conditions of the soak, but

agrees to the return of belarusians under the neutral flag of the national team, but no matter how you can’t do this now, one of the most categorically talk about changing citizenship, which can greatly it was usually very difficult to simplify the development of a career in russia and they immediately put them in pairs to fight, of course , then the first and perhaps the only winner of the world championship in 2023 baksan was enough, which weaves with beads step by step year after year, what we should do optimists belarusian women's hockey gathers all those who know how to skate and deliberately qualify for the olympics the main sporting event of the week, as often happens in recent years, was not some kind of records or other achievements, and a decision in high offices could have recommended

allowing belarusians to compete in international competitions, but imposed a number of difficult conditions, only the neutral status of our athletes is unconditional, and everything else is very difficult understand without further consultation. after all, it is very incomprehensible and at least ambiguously written about the military declaration about law enforcement agencies, which officials require from surveying. so far, all these conditions hint at the fact that he could kind of invite him to return to the sports family, and with his next gesture he shows the stop sign, this topic, during forgiveness to the people and parliament, touched the president’s height, if he comes out and speaks and he won’t be on currently found the flag. well, what's less pride it will be for him this is a patriot this is our man we will know that it is he or arina who won the tournament rybakin, remember recently she lost

to rybina in the final to someone in miami . we all know that well done sick, she won. i wanted to lose six double faults in the last game and didn't even hit the lunge very much. i'm still going to deal with her about this. we also know this, and therefore success is failure. for us for our society, it does not depend on whether it will be unpopular, i will say whether he will be with a flag or beslan, he will come home and at the airport will unfold this belarusian flag and say, i was deprived of the right to compete under this flag there, but i am a patriot, so i will say from the personality of an athlete. this is his life.

an unpleasant event of the past week was the start of the national football team of belarus from switzerland and romania, the result, of course, is very bad, you can sympathize with the guys that they have had to play all matches on the road for many years now, that they are not to blame for insufficient qualifications in our football schools, however even on tv you can see, with the naked eye, that the team lacked charge . a professional athlete should be more angry to play for the prohibition of motivation. this is the only way to negate the strengths of even a strong opponent, these are common truths, about which everyone knows, but it’s impossible to charge the national team of the current coaching staff and