this is the security council because we have adopted the joint doctrine of a union state. and there are definite directions. these are our parliaments, which have also created a legislative framework that allows us to resolve issues of ensuring national security. well, a number of other ministries of defense. naturally, joint work. and, probably, a number of others will agree that the president actually made the decision. yes, the father said, the father did. that's when poland announced its wishlist to place nuclear weapons in myself. they also announced this publicly . the president said that we should respond to this in a mirror image and we will prepare for this. the deadline is set before the first of july. so, anyway, thanks to what this project will be implemented in such a short time? there are two components that need to be discussed

first. thank the lord god with history that we have such a leader who keeps his word. let's say something divine, since the times of the soviet union we still have certain possibilities for storing nuclear weapons. in our territory there were quite a lot of such objects, but we kept them. we have kept this main word, and we clearly understand the second component - the close interaction of the allies between us and the russian federation. well, they started right. the old man said, the old man made a reservation. in these areas, or agreements were reached earlier and with a trigger. the actions of the united west of european states and the events that are taking place in ukraine served as a trigger. this is true.

let's talk about how to be open to the world no matter what, i'm always ready to brag. i always say we can we will we want, because i get really excited about really talented ideas, in fact, the main goal. uh, we pursue if our citizen has an idea capable of commercialization. he must have every opportunity to realize it, which is why we are spinning. so what's more , here are many say the market. here is the market the market needs to spin. what is the theater to answer energy exchange. and why will it always be the same, because people come to see come, and we give to live differently. e, the sooner we teach our children to do good deeds with the islanding of the right mercy and the participation of help. uh, for those who need it, the healthier the generation grows up. say, don't

be silent, watch on tv channel belarus 24 only by joining forces and demonstrating all your intellectual abilities can you become a winner, but it seems to me that this phrase was attributed to. uh, the first astronauts okay, let's let egypt be gone. will the earth their main goal is to answer questions and earn money. as many points as possible. what is the name of the extra distance that a biathlete is forced to cover for a miss at the turn? ruslan how many attempts are given to serve in tennis two attempts two attempts. absolutely right, they are ready to do everything to win, but it was yes, i remember that there is an indian and african elephant, but i don’t remember exactly. which one is larger, because if you raise, well, a comma

, five numbers by five squares, you get the number 25, but not at all, two integers, look intellectually entertaining shows on belarus 24 tv channel . well, look, re-experts believe that the west did not foresee such a rapprochement between russia and china once, but against the backdrop of sanctions and threats. well, let's say so stupid about taiwanese attacks. e voyage of this palace. yes pelossi, as she said, although sour, he always urged not to provoke. this is the rapprochement of the two superpowers. well, the smell. naturally, he did not calculate the possibility of such decisive retaliatory actions on the part of belarus and russia to deploy a tactical

nuclear weapons. here on the territory of belarus for sure. it wasn't spelled out. how can we say. so the development of events was not thought, in your opinion, what is the loss of this global reality on the part of western politicians, why did they stop listening and hearing even their very smart political scientists, to whom i relate. marat sergeevich, you know, i would not argue so deeply that they were not ready for this issue. i'm pretty sure there have been certain studies of their thought factories that have looked at these questions as an option. i admit, as an option, but here it is the second part of the question on the main one and it is in the following. why the west didn't want to see it, but didn't want to. he sees this

because of his arrogance and habit of treating everyone else like a jungle. that's exactly the correct one. they believed in their impunity, they believed in their hmm loftiness, or probably, pick up such a word. in my permissiveness, i called it like this and a new iteration of western politicians who have not seen it. e relics of the soviet union who have forgotten what is great patriotic war. they were brought up, disdain for all other states, it was before it was a system. slavery, which was many years ago , it is at the heart of all this, but these people, forgetting that you can get an answer, as

normal people say, decided that everything was permissible for them. and what happened? correct assessments, and i am almost sure that they were , it cannot be that among the analytical community it is strong enough and there are people who look far enough into including women's. no matter how hater he was of both russia and belarus and extreme human rights, he spoke for many years even before that he said that it should not be allowed. uh, so let's say the unification of russia and china should be confidently the main thing here, the component he was sure that his sanctions pressure and a blow to russia could not be sustained. here in my opinion. this is precisely the cornerstone mistake, that is , russia should have completely stopped developing by the twenty-third year, as we

said, fall apart as a state, after all, oh what is at stake, how does the mantra tell that russia should fall apart into a component and they broadcast it. in all e on the media on all sorts of platforms. this is the mistake that the west made, they could not even imagine that any state could withstand such a powerful blow, and the next step is the reasonable steps of russia, the reasonable steps of belarus , russia, the reasonable steps of china, which realized that it would be next and, accordingly, the creation of these correct timely movement guides. alexander grigoryevich lukashenko trip to china sidepin trip to russia joint work of russia and belarus and we are slowly getting out of this tailspin. and what

will happen to the west time will show the most interesting thing, what is history? doesn't teach anything . uh, once hitler was absolutely sure that he would ruin the country in the twentieth year, there were more lecture courses that promised that by the twenty-fifth year russia would turn into 30 independent states. they really went around with these lectures with maps and demonstrated it, but they forgot tanks in berlin and kazakov in paris yes, i really like it. here is an anecdote. but all the same, okay, it’s never evgenievich nato, in the meantime, it’s also not shy, and it will come like a tank without brakes. let's talk directly about the possible entry of sweden and finland, it has already been announced, as if even the statement had been written, and they create direct threats to the northern ones. wheat, yes, the union state. this greatly changes the configuration of forces in the region in the northern

region. here is the accommodation we have from the nuclear weapons on our territory. in belarus , the alignment of forces is also changing to a certain extent. well, let's say that. we are voicing not only that we will store nuclear warheads on our territory. well, in our country , iskanders also have a place to be 40 km. yes, and there i really like 500 km - this is what the russian claims. yes, for some reason, the americans write in separate articles that the range is possibly up to 2,000 km. well, it’s just that it’s not publicly voiced by each other’s rocket. yes, the heads may be different. good joint steps. here is belarus, russia , if you look like this globally, it is more than justified, right? but where is the check here, where is the checkmate, and where is the zuntzwang, if chess rhetoric, in order to predict development options, you need to have the maximum amount of information? i repeatedly remember in my life such moments

when hasty forecasts. nothing good was brought about in our situation. well, we started with what, uh, there are two new members of nato yes. but all these years they were considered as potential brothers. well, if not the republic and belarus, then the russian federation is definitely my experience of communicating with russian colleagues. clearly says this they were considering. uh , the need to take into account the potential of these states in the face of god forbid, let's say a confrontation in this region. and everything that these states did. in general, it was in support of nato and their aspirations. therefore , to say that this new step is not a knife, and they were really ready to use their potential in their interests. i am far from thinking that our russian colleagues hmm, this is not

take into account, therefore , it is impossible to talk about it as something new. further all the infrastructure, uh, of these northern european states, it has long been adapted; let's go back to the history of the great patriotic war. how many kilometers they advanced towards russia and let's stop there for now. that's all and the question. how ready and willing are they to fight? maybe today they have a certain wariness that their political elites use in order to frighten russia once again and solve their problem. to the people. it doesn't matter how the finns traveled, how they went to st. petersburg for shopping and other issues, so they will continue. if they have such an opportunity, if the border is closed, then something else is simple, but these countries are unlikely to want to fight. my logic tells me a little that it's one thing when you have

a gun, and another thing when you take it out and start demonstrating the transfer swings at the other. uh, let's say the opponent. so after all, at one time, the finnish war, it began precisely in order to push the threat away, even from the same leningrad a little further away, despite the rather ambiguous results of this finnish winter company, let's say, but that task was solved. here i would probably add the following and we have taken into account the historical lessons. and this step that has been taken today, including the deployment of tactical nuclear weapons on the territory of the republic of belarus, is a real response to the data. unfriendly steps in relation to the union state, i will say frankly provocative, you cannot help but touch on this topic here. uh, especially with a phd next a supporter of zelensky rahami, yes, who

participated in the negotiations initially once peaceful, he said that the mobilization of men was in full force. now it will be accelerated for the acquisition of units that will be deployed on the border with belarus as a response to the deployment of nuclear weapons, i don’t really see the logic. well, in your opinion, who are these statements intended for? and what is real? maybe we can stand behind them, let's start with the first one for whom these statements are designed for european partners and countries that support ukraine , we demonstrate loyalty once again, even more we show that we are ready not only to fight with russia, but almost to close the whole of europe with our own breasts. this is the first direction the second direction after all. uh, to pay tribute and i will emphasize this again, uh, after all, zelensky and his team are very

good pr people. and here there is one more calculation - calculation for their own citizens, who also need it. to create an image of the enemy, because no matter how we say it, belarus has never been an enemy for ukraine, and i am also a person who spent quite a lot of years in ukraine and is connected with this state in a tribal way i clearly say that there are sane people there. and today this escalation is an attempt. show that the country is on fire, the country is surrounded by enemies. and this idea should be hammered into the head of their own people so that they perceive themselves as patriots of the country. they supposedly have to protect their own family. i think this is a deep meaning that is directed precisely at this, as the second component, uh-huh , that is, the next war of mobilization. such a powerful under is not supplied by the base. yes, yes, why

are you going to war, because the country is all around belarusian enemies are all around, they will soon attack you. although, to be honest, from a military point of view, well , the untrue is absolutely correct for these statements among themselves cannot be connected from a military point of view. you know, here's a good phic command. yes, but this pr has already been standing in the life of several hundred thousand ukrainians for a second, just so that we would not forget about it, yes, more and more often, however, i get the impression that the western world against the backdrop of the war in ukraine yes, it has already gone haywire here, although these people show loyalty, but this is not only when crossing the red lines, which are constantly mentioned. well, let's try then with a simulation. and what will happen to this unfortunate country, which has become a hostage. here are these pr people of the ninety-fifth. and what is the ending for her? i am very interested in your view of the view of a military man with acceptable to the west and what fate awaits? well, let's just say

the rest of ukraine, taking into account already 200 billion, debts that must be paid and the ruin of the economy. you see, you have raised such a deep question that it is not being solved, military, component here and the economy here and politics. well, let's try to answer this question. i would return to the words of the president of russia, which he said at the beginning of the operation, the purpose of the operation was denocification. remember this phrase. and the demilitarization of this area, this is the first or given area of ​​the second defense, the third defense of the russians, and the people living in the country, in my opinion, in my opinion. i do not claim to be the truth in the latest stations and do not want to be the person

to be quoted in this area. russia ukraine will lose those four regions, which she has already lost. she will lose odessa in all likelihood with nikolaev. she will lose these areas. and this would be perfect for her. from the point of completion of this confrontation. yes, for her. it would be ideal. in this case, it would have retained its statehood. still , sane people should come to power in this country. this is the option that one of the options is possible, the other option is the continuation of the escalation, the development to a higher phase , the destruction of many cities in ukraine, including

including and as an option all this opposition to the european territory, maybe, as an option, if you do not sit down at the negotiating table in time? as for the west, it would be ideal for her to destroy russia, the most important thing, so that russia would not be able to fulfill the task facing her and ultimately suffer a military defeat, and her economy would simply not survive. this is the ideal variant for the west , the minimum variant for the west is. so, today's four regions that are left as part of russia as they were?