that is, you definitely can’t hide your head in the sand. one must be on the alert to defend one's land, and any attack on independence. we won't let the boot chu. zhogo soldier or foreigner is not friendly. we are set to cross our border. if this is followed, we will respond symmetrically adequately. well, why use nuclear weapons if our fugitive banners are ahead of them, and behind them, that the first division, which i said, where our territories have already been set as a goal in belarus. we have enough other weapons to counter this. but, if we see that behind this lies the destruction of our country, we will apply everything that we have questions that we have been conducting throughout the country of unprecedented growth, military threats, if it is blazing around it is difficult to think about

something else belarusians to the world used to, and it's still great even if for someone it has become a kind of banal reality, belarus well , maybe the only or one of the very few examples of the post-soviet space, where in the post-perestroika years , it was implemented without a conflict policy memory, and, of course, this is largely the merit of president lukashenko personally, because, looking around the perimeter. we see how the former soviet national republics, and without exception it was possible to observe, if not burning conflicts, there were many burning civil conflicts. he is this creeping confrontation. e, nezhitnicheskogo june 25, 1945, belarus signed the un charter and became a full subject of international

law. yes, minsk was then part of the ussr, but everyone appreciated the contribution of our people to the common victory . it’s a pity that the memory of the west is short selectively. although even then washington was worried about its influence, and not about the general architecture of the world, the requirements of the soviet leadership, but the membership of an international organization, 16 soviet. the republic seriously alarmed roosevelt in a message received by stalin on september 1, 1944, the us president expressed concern about this position of the soviet government. he stressed that it could not be accepted by the united states and other major countries, according to roosevelt, a danger was created for the implementation of the entire project to create an international organizations. simply put, he was afraid that the united states would lose the rose. a troll over an organization that is just being created, but even he was forced to admit that for the onset of peace, belarus did a lot, as a result, only two republics of the ussr became separate founders. we and ukraine what happened to the second country

the phrase security donor, and in general. this is a rather capacious definition, which, in its depth, emphasizes the whole complex of belarusian e-peace initiatives that we observed during the soviet period. this justified, and the desire for peacekeeping is an understanding of security and stability as one of the highest values, but let's fast forward to the period of independent belarus only in the first years of independence. minsk has signed approximately 1,000 agreements, conventions , treaty protocols and memorandums. trying to live by the rules and respect partners in the nineties, belarus expanded the network of diplomatic missions by a meter, 58 embassies. you are more than a hundred countries, we have joined the osce, the ebrd, the euro-atlantic partnership council and many other organizations with one goal

to provide the architecture of the world with a solid foundation, while alexander lukashenko has always adhered to a clear position that no wars of obstacles and sanctions can be resolved by military means, especially bypassing the un security council, the future lies with those provisions of the european security charter, which speaks of preventive political rather than forceful means of settlement , conflicting in nagorno-karabakh yes, in the nineties it was hard for ourselves, but peace is first of all in the ninety -second, the osce minsk group was created to resolve the conflict between baku and yerevan, a year later, the minsk group proposed a plan for an updated schedule, which in 2020 minsk actively tried to solve the problem along the line. ude need to talk. he was called by the belarusian leader at one time, when, in my opinion, we will sentence him, he talked in a friendly way, and i asked him a question. so jokingly, i say , you won’t give ilham, well, you need to help armenia, if you agree, but it was about five and a half

or six, there were these areas of azerbaijani regions. uh, as they stated captured by the armies, the armenians admitted that this is not our land, this is azerbaijani, except for karabakh well , or rather, it would have been returned, when i proposed to do this, these areas of the war would not exist. ilham would not have. well, roughly speaking , the motivation to start this war. well, you asked , probably, they gave the status of karabakh, but they would have decided in a calm manner, but at the same time i didn’t agree with my heart, i didn’t change it later . lukashenka was not afraid of such words. alisa began their materials in 1999 , the young president of belarus flew to yugoslavia despite the actual threats of nato even under the bombardment of democratic missiles. the first was ready to support the people close to us, if only the senseless war

would end. it is interesting that nato military representatives were the first to clean up belarus, not only to journalists, who arrived in serbia in hope. to bring closer the onset of peace in the country, but it is better to destroy yugoslavia the united states did not stop june 3 , 2006 montenegro was divided in 2008, kosovo was playing with fire , minsk said a unique combination of factors that developed around kosovo, the collapse of yugoslavia was an ethnic cleansing crime. against civilians can be seen as a precedent for any other situation in today's world classic - it's different after a few months, when russia is recognized. george w. bush called abkhazia and ossetia a violation of international norms. already in 2010, when it became obvious that the west wants from belarus only a car dealership. we have begun to actively build

bridges to asia, the creation of the eu work, along the line. the sco was held in the palace of independence , the presidents of russia, ukraine, france and the german chancellor tried to reach an agreement 16 hours, as a result, the parties agreed to cease fire in the donbas from february 15, 2015, then alexander lukashenko will note that we will do everything to stop the bloodshed, we decided to derail the minsk agreements with a new round of conflict, minsk again invited us to negotiate, but the west dictates it’s different now, and poroshenko and landa merkel adjust to the situation in unison, the absurd ones have hardened, we won time for ukraine the ukrainian conflict, the ukrainian conflict as well as the so-called external ukrainian president, well, just like

the previous one, this poroshenko is controlled by completely different forces, these forces , let's say, are not forces connected from the european union with germany there with france with other guarantors low agreements for more than 2 years, belarus provided a platform for the contact group on ukraine that we received criticism in return saying that minsk ignores human rights, but minsk did not snap back and was always open about this same year. we had a large-scale parliamentary assembly of the osce. the assembly then gathered 700 representatives from fifty- seven countries. in four days of work , the minsk declaration was developed and adopted. it is in itself the resolution of political issues and economic interaction at the panel discussion, the president of belarus then said that democracy in belarus is no less than in europe. just if the secretary of the council thomas granger, belarus plays an extremely important role in several aspects of the

security sphere at once. it is, of course, well-known tripartite contact group. this is a real platform for dialogue on the minsk agreements. and even more, belarus has traditionally been and remains the so-called bridgebuilder. it helps build bridges of trust and understanding. this role is very important because of the split between east and west. unfortunately it's getting deeper. this is a fundamental problem, and belarus is taking initiatives so that the parties come to an agreement on common terms in order to overcome challenges. for a long time the mind was not enough, if you remember 2020 and everything that follows after the western ones lied, by the way, it was at the osce assembly in minsk that alexander lukashenko announced the need. helsinki 2 of the new global dialogue on lukashenka's security, they are certainly extremely timely, because eastern europe needs peace and it is necessary one way or another to come to some decisions armed and the sooner this

happens. so it will be better for everyone, because indeed, as in president koshenko, a large number of people are dead. ah, and a lot of people become disabled, get injured and so on peaceful, the population suffers. and in general, this is a big trouble after 2 years in 2019, already at the minsk dialogue, the president will once again confirm the world is not getting better, the degree of distrust towards confrontation is growing, the struggle for resources humanity is leaps and bounds. it is moving towards the line, beyond which there is only one abyss and it is always better to create performances than to argue. minsk also actively promoted the idea, despite some contradictions by the bloc. need to work. there is simply no other need in the prospects for such cooperation could become a common economic space from lisbon to vladivostok is another initiative for unification, and then there was 2020, which finally made us sober, no one needs peace and stability in the region. we

let's talk to us funding, extremists. and support for militants, fugitives and pseudo-politicians to a heap, and also a sanctions strike. moreover, over the past few years , drones from ukraine have been constantly violating our border belarus concentrated several nato divisions with only 36.000 american soldiers. it's not about the world. looks like the president. poland anji are going to do the same, i emphasize for deterrence and defense the cries and hysterics about the escalation of justice for the sake of the possible deployment of nuclear weapons in belarus. lukashenka’s weapons really, he says for almost a year and a half even before the war in november, 2021, he said that this could be the answer to the deployment of american nuclear weapons in poland, our country was actively accused, they say they sent troops to ukraine but the only thing

whom we could stop the armed uprising in almaty and prevent the bloody civil war, that is, the csto demonstrated. why does the belarusians exist to maintain peace, but never in their history have they attacked anyone, have they been a source of threat. we have no territorial claims to anyone, and this is written in the constitution we are peaceful people more than once from the lips of lukashenka in various formats belarus has often and loudly called for good neighborliness and equal dialogue to build confidence and localize regional conflicts in response to lies and the imposition of their views. even he seems to have stripped members. the un demonstrates not just a lack of cooperation, it will call into question the principles of equality and, in general, the fairness of the whole process, a solid lie, disregard for the opinions of other members, fanatical imposition of their views. some countries, contrary to the opinions of others, have arrogated to themselves the right to evaluate

and condemn behavior by imposing their own rules. the truly paradoxical has not been covered up in the west for a long time. at least the mantle of diplomacy, just creativity and respectful dialogue. in the garden of eden has long been forgotten, it seems they will not remember sanctions harsh pressure border closures ban on flights. for athletes and other restrictions, injections are now in vogue, such methods of organizing the state are translated so , on the other hand, this is revenge for let's say so closely and the interaction of belarus and russia in various economic areas, and in industry there in trade , agriculture and so on. if you look not even closely, but for starters a little more carefully for a person in politics, not really next will be. it is clear that the west is rocking the planet by ignoring the security system, tearing and devaluing important international agreements, carelessly shaking the already fragile system of checks and balances, which was so difficult to create after the collapse of the unions, and that’s it. this is against the background

of the intention to escalate the military-political situation in our region. militarization of lithuania poland the apparently constant provocations in the statements, decisions and actions of the official authorities do not stop. not to mention pumping weapons, blazing ukraine and it turns out that the world is really for the west. kind of like a disaster. this means that countries can develop. calmly and without kabbalah. this means that their magic was wasted on inciting hatred and undermining objectionable regimes. we live no worse than others, especially our neighbors, where we constantly schmidt. they turned out to be certain parts of society. i don't like it. and it's not necessary. what part and what we don't like, we know today. but it was a very important moment in our history and thank god that it was and thank god that it ended with this, and after that i constantly draw your attention, do not relax. do not

relax, repeat it all. did everyone hear me honestly, what is called tried their democracy and human rights? we understood from our bitter experience that they will not let us live in peace. we said so to the twentieth. and today we see that they do not give life in peace, unfortunately, a great geopolitics thing, changeable agreements of the norms of decency are quickly forgotten. it would turn out that the general rule and morality yes, it works for some, but for others sharply becomes completely its own world in every sense of this super-important word. happily. in service on june 21 here from now. how much energy has already been generated and what is the economic effect of this?

well, it must be said in general that since the inclusion of the first block of belos in the unified energy system, which was on november 3, 2020 , 12.8 billion hours of electricity have been generated. this allowed us to replace more than 3 billion cubic meters of imported natural gas with the commissioning of the second power unit, the volume of about 40% internal needs for it and replace somewhere around 4.5 billion cubic meters of gas annually, respectively. our country will take a significant step in strengthening energy security and will be able to reduce its dependence on the year ahead, which is especially important now against the background of turbulence in the world energy markets and taking into account the significant increase in prices for energy resources, including electricity. that is, these are the numbers when as will work at full capacity, right? yes , it will happen, when they introduce the second block, it will happen, in the second half of the year of the current year

, it is expected in the very near future that the reactor of the second power unit of the nuclear power plant will be launched. the chain reaction will begin technological work to bring the reactor plant to a minimum controllable level. this is 1% of its capacity and then the specialists will be able to move on to the energy launch. what does it mean? this means that there is still a lot of work ahead, and before commissioning , there will be a stage of pilot commercial operation, which provides for a phased gradual development of the power of the reactor plant with carrying out a complex of tests and studies in different modes of operation of the unit, including with disconnection from the network and a planned stop. these are standard works for this stage, that is, specialists must make sure that absolutely all technological systems , equipment units work in accordance with the design characteristics and will work. that's safe and secure. and as it is provided, only after that the specialists will be able to move on. hey, that's also an important milestone. and after

that, a is expected here in the block, a in service, then there are, here are blocks of industrial operation, and this will be, as i have already noted, the second half of the year, namely october of this year, of course, i continue the topic of security. nuclear power plants, our western neighbors can often speculate on the topic of safety, despite how many checks how many raids we have e, from the iaea comes from the iaea and all experts unanimously assure that our plant is safe. this is how the safety of the plant is ensured and, in general, the nuclear and radiation safety of this facility. our station meets absolutely everything safety requirements. and this has been repeatedly confirmed by international expert missions. first of all, it should be noted that belarus became the first site where the state corporation rosatom built an atom. hansa's safety vault is a special feature of this project, and it is precisely the combination of active and passive safety systems that the reactor

covers with a double shell. it will not suffer even in the event of an earthquake flood. we would n't even need to activate them. uh, human intervention, that is, everything is automated from the moment of construction nuclear power plant, our country regularly interacts on a systematic basis with leading international nuclear power plants - this is the european group of regulators in the field of nuclear safety. that is, for example, from 2012 to 2022. in our country, nuclear power plants being built for the first time took place, while she noted the positive experience of belarus , positively assessed the work carried out both in the formation of our nuclear infrastructure and practice today are an example for other countries newcomers to nuclear energy, accordingly, the belarusian experience is taken into account by international recommendations for these countries. when you watch and a group of tvs, how

does the name cinderella sound in belarusian , answer if you can, and this is a deep thread of logic that will come in handy in the third round. and here, after all, knowledge, we develop memory , we train.