you will learn a lot of new things, you will come back. well, you'll see how the neighbors live. here is to develop your own development. well, on the other hand, those people who are people who go there to spain. yes , there is a lot of great greece to vitaly, where i was too, and all the objects, the status of those objects, is nothing more interesting, nothing a lot of ours.

hello. thank you for being with us and welcome the guests of this edition as well. today, we are waiting in the studio of the famous russian writer, tv presenter leonid mlechin, but let's start with a loud vladimir putin was the phrases of the deployment of nuclear weapons in belarus blew up the information front. let's start with this question and start, probably, and tell for those who still do not understand. and why do we need tactical nuclear weapons from ivanovich in the current situation around belarus, i will say so even a union state. it is such that, in general, the use of soft only soft military force. that is, so far only the deployment of

russian tactical nuclear weapons is still in some. well, you said some yourself. brought a tantrum, a some heads and cooled down in this regard. for us it is of great importance today. here is one division near the kaliningrad region, the second division near grodno is being formed in poland poland is increasing its armed forces almost twice and again asking the united states to place tactical nuclear weapons in it, this should not be forgotten and should not be, maybe, uh, the belarusian armed forces forces, it also has a reciprocal value among the six states of europe - there are few nuclear weapons, and aviation above and uh, let's say some types of artillery, let's say they are sharpened for this today. and it's

been there for over forty years. why can’t we have one on our territory, although it will still be under the jurisdiction of the russian armed forces, this must also be understood, because when they began to say that belarus had turned into nuclear weapons, it was not so. it's not so absolute. we can use these nuclear weapons. let's say. so only with uh, the russian side on the other side. the russian federation has repeatedly emphasized that if some enemy troops enter the territory of belarus, then if it suddenly needs to be protected by all means , the russian federation has never hidden that all these means, but no, by default mean. what if, of course, god forbid such a scale implies a nuclear shield. and he will also be about. well, let's just say that the nuclear umbrella over belarus has just become closer and lower. alexei and why is there such a reaction after all? and so nervously

excited, because vladimir putin alexander lukashenka has repeatedly said in recent months that guys, if you continue to violate the red lines in the same way, then we will systematically implement our security step by step in the form in which we understand it. yes, well, it is necessary to support the valuable ivanovich in that part that is along the borders of the union state. this applies not only to belarus. this also applies to the pskov region of the leningrad region. we must understand very well that, and this is not just done, uh, on the part of nato, this is there is, a certain orientation of their strategic plans, and which, of course, is connected with the fact that, at some point in our weakening , we will capture the kaliningrad region and, uh, our western ones. e

area. we have talked about this more than once, of course. uh, hmm, those forces and means that the command of washington and london at some stage will decide on this operation for the presence, and tactical nuclear weapons completely destroy their plans. why only they will make one step on our territory inflicting a tactical nuclear weapons completely destroy this entire group within literally a matter of minutes. yes, and then the meaning after uh, all these gestures. further there will be only peace negotiations. moreover, with a position from a position, and the fact that they are aggressors, of course, should not only, but take away plans and both of them. um, you know, nato and the us and , well, the political elites of the us and the uk they are, uh. you know how they come to investors

with their business plan, and this business plan tries to implement them, and of course they finance their ideas. and when these ideas fail realized, that is, naturally, investors will ask these political persons, and where is the result, where is the result, that you captured or weakened russia , there will be no result, yes, and of course, and why they are nervous, because in the near future political lithium, which is now in power. she will have to answer to, and those who financed them. well, in the sense of very specific terms in this interview, vladimir putin called, and i, probably, the final answer for those abroad, who, as before, probably thought that lukashenka putin was bluffing when he said that when it comes to national security, no one will joke with the people themselves and will respond by all possible means andrey what do you think, but this is the reaction here this is the solution. you see something, what i see, firstly, they

are changing, the way they work against us. that is, anyway. probably they are not planning some kind of direct military sub-link. i know the specifics there, they know the language and what we saw for example, on the rubbish. no, it's preparation. these are the guys who can enter the area to seize it, and then we allegedly will not be able to use this territory. here is such a weapon. that is, as far as poland is concerned. yes , this containment is permanent, so that we keep it there. troops and thus diverted forces to the polish direction. and now this problem is solved. that is, if we have such a tactical weapon, then we can throw more resources at some other area. for example, if there are problems on the south border, and if we talk about such an attack, it can only be combined, that is, on the one hand, these are doing this, and on the other hand, they are doing this. that’s what it is, they also don’t give and they consider nasheeds unconditionally. what about application? well, as they say, we don’t really need to worry about it, because there are certain signs of the use of such weapons, they are not constantly on alert. it should, let's say, be like this, e from the repository, let's say it is prepared, then it connects it to the carrier, then only after that it is used. that is, they say, here are the signs we do not see, so do what you want, in

fact, the reaction is quite calm. at least what we see in the americans. this means that they believe that, apparently, we will not apply it after all, or if we change it, they will be able to change the constitution, they have already allowed the same. here, probably, something will stand in belarus. well , specifically, this has already been decided by the president. here we took this option, but i repeat the storage. this is also very important, because what russia thus shows means it we are fully trusted by the situation in the country is controlled. this is not the 20th year, when it is not clear what would happen, that is, we can even place such types of weapons here. and this is a good signal from the west, including, look here, everything is under complete control julia konstantin well, this once again shows that the republic of belarus and the russian federation have reached such a truly strategic partner. we are completely trusted since we were also entrusted with nuclear weapons. yes, under the control of the russian federation, only with the order of the main team also of the russian federation, but nevertheless, as if a union state, which for a long time went to the implementation of such important strategic programs. uh, which we showed that we are very close.

well, this is such a very real step for many experts are talking about this, that they really strengthened our cooperation and shows that we are really strategic partners. now, more so. and it’s also like a step towards pre-emption , all the same, these are moved figures that demonstrate that we are, despite the fact that we are changing, an attempt to find e ways of dialogue peaceful dialogue on the regulation of all situations, but we are also ready for the development of events. that is , as the president said, they wanted to attack us. let him try, if you remember the words of the president as early as the second of july in my twenty- second year. on the eve of independence day at a solemn meeting. he said that this topic appeared immediately after the poles turned to the americans for the last time and asked them to bring them nuclear weapons to poland. this was discussed in detail and then alexander lukashenko spoke to the president. putin he said. and why do we pretend that nothing is happening, this is a very logical question. this time. well, in fact

, according to the words of the russian federation, that is, the last step was that they were going to supply weapons to ukraine with a united iran. that is , it was the last step. this is the second time and the second moment, uh, the republic of belarus, as it were, after the collapse of the soviet union there, the russian radio withdrew all nuclear weapons, from and including from the republic of belarus, which the united states did not do anything to nato, that is, we return those positions that we will have a statement for the british minister of defense, which really stirred up, which became a trigger for the parties to articulate their nuclear plans more intelligibly. here is a decision on the supply of projectiles with combined uranium to ukraine , here is what you see behind this, first of all , about the features. you have already figured out all the features of shells. eh, everyone has already googled

and read, but what should be seen in such a geopolitical sense, and against the background of the statement of the supply of these layers. here's what's interesting attempts to call tensions absolutely absolutely directly or maybe pressure in ukraine will not change anything. absolutely nothing will change the question only will. the fact is that, it seems to me, here, even the ecological component should be taken , after all, the best black soil in ukraine, yes, but the fact is that, uh, with a conventional projectile. yes, when using it, such things do not happen, as when using an early core. the fact is that there the plasma gives rise to the so-called uranium dust and this the territory becomes infected and, moreover , it is born for 1,000 years.

simply, in this case, we can say that there will be just literally large areas of contamination, that is , such people's lands, ukraine yes, in the ukrainian chernobyl they do not have such radioactivity, but in any case, they are no longer suitable for use in agriculture defeat of human power and people are walking along, still sighing this uranium dust. here, in principle, destruction, yes, that is, he is on his own. well, at the moment of use, he understands that these shells are in they are mainly used to pierce the thickness of uh, 40 cm. yes, armor or reinforced concrete structures, that is, in reality they are uh, where they can be used, or against. uh, heavy taxation, in general, yes, but, but the question is, uh, the other thing is, uh, how many of them do these shells actually have in the uk itself, there are not so many of them, uh and uh, these

technologies, if i i say correctly, if anything, alexander ivanovich rules. it was immediately in the sixties of 60-70 that e-e began to be used, that is, in reality we can say that the united kingdom is once again, like all nato countries, trying to get rid of its old weapons and weapons, plus the implementation of that disposal. well, uranus has actually been worked out, which equipment is being disposed of in ukraine, and such weapons, outdated, very expensive processes in order to dispose of these ammunition. and so, and gave them to them, they used them, infected the territory, but the infection of the territory was correctly said. this is what it says about the fact that e great britain and the collective west, in principle, already understands what they are. will leave ukraine a and is called and i will not give you. yes? why because

they understand what those territories are? ah, with fertile soil, if they depart, that is, of course, all grain deals will stop, or until and will continue to operate. eh, aside. uh, naturally russia or there towards turkey yes, and not in any way not u western corporations that currently own it. e most fertile land. in ukraine, the net profit on this will not receive its jackpot. this is in fact, and an attempt, but to write off these lands and tell our own capitalist investors that, you see , we don’t give them away just like that, it may be that, among other things, these statements about the supply of shells with combined uranium. this is a sign that