treat infectious diseases, as well as carry out a variety of procedures from organ transplantation to chemotherapy for oncology. we have worked quite a lot of time with usable problems. you know that uh our country is trailing apart - it's hmm there are few institutions that get this status based on our experience. and here is the interaction that the management of the infectious block rather structural interaction led to the fact that when the times of the pandemic came, and during our different years. these are very short ah. believers in the countries that received the first

certificate to stop the transmission of the human deficiency virus infection and today our country received another certificate from representatives of its belarusian doctors, have met the regional indicators of the fight against hepatitis. b thanks to the immunization program. new information. at my colleagues at 15:00 on our air. all the best.

kirill has already said that there were 2 million people who watched the message of the head of state on tv alone. how many excerpts and clippings did he look at different internet platforms in tiktok on instagram in telegram on youtube some phrases have already become trends some messages have already fallen in love. uh, they quote, they retell, but andrey ivanovich is my question. this will be addressed to you first, because together

we prepared and prepared for the message, and you are one of those people who are also directly involved in preparing materials for the message that the head of state will announce. and now you know it's gone. uh, a few days since this big big event in the palace of the republic as i have already told many experts, many viewers. ordinary belarusians have already digested it, but for you, everything has just begun. e, the work as an analyst has just begun, and in this regard, your opinion. here. you probably watched how people discuss it on the air, and maybe somewhere among themselves. and how accurate and correct. they understood everything that alexander lukashenko wanted to convey to the audience. alena but at first said that a lot of people are involved in the preparation of the message, so that there is no mistaken idea that this is not theirs

not much. indeed, it is also a number of state bodies of the state organization of the scientific organization expert and civil society. well, that is, such a pyramid, a lot from below, then less and then as a result a small group of people who clearly know what is required, they are finalizing, but at the top, of course, the head of state is already there, because he decides that he will go, he rewrites, adds and strikes out. that is, he is preparing this message for him. we help them. this is the first. and what people are discussing, of course, in the first place is but the peace initiative of the head of state, but , because the president expressed the opinion, probably, of all belarusians, and people are for peace, for an end to this senseless anya , tens of thousands of people are dying on both sides. how many refugees? ruined no one needs it. this initiative is really worth a lot, because, in

principle, there have been few such initiatives lately, we know the chinese initiative and we know the belarusian one. uh, the west rejects chinese, but no further than yesterday, and the minister of defense of the czech republic and yana she supported china's initiative to chernokhov . will she support the initiative in belarus , but given the attitude of the west to our country, of course, publicly, it is unlikely that big politicians will declare this. but at least they heard and appreciated all this, that is, the initiative. she took her place, and the world without any conditions. without eating, they stopped, and then you start talking. same. you see, these hmm theses are quite unambiguous theses of alexander lukashenko for us. and on different sides they begin to try to interpret in some other way. why is this happening? to take it out of context to somehow adapt it to suit your interests, someone is dissatisfied. i am generally satisfied with this position, as if the head

of an independent and sovereign state does not have the right to his own opinion, his own vision. uh, just our president's credibility. he has the international authority of him as a politician as a leader and clinging to his opinion. it can be interpreted in any way. i think many analysts are experts in political science, have earned large fees a paragraph from a speech president and a huge view. that's all. well, you know, actually, i also really looked at the weekend a lot, when they were talking about the message, and my eyes were most attracted to one topic, nuclear weapons, the world. yes, but very quickly , politicians in kiev once said that what kind of world lukashenka does not understand anything about this is ridiculous and really it's a shame. perhaps, indeed, in the west they take this a little more seriously, because it is the west that spends money on the war in ukraine. here, as regards nuclear weapons, then, despite the fact that that the poles had palm sunday. i

don't think they slept there at all. they talked about the fact that, well, it is really dangerous that nuclear weapons will suddenly appear in belarus and i have a feeling that even according to some journalistic statements. and this really caused such an absolutely adequate fear on our part, they are afraid igor how do you think to be afraid at all? productive, because the presence or absence of nuclear weapons in our country from the point of view of the danger to us. it is such an extremely debatable rather, presence. we have a nuclear any weapon rather protects us from external aggression. what attracts increased attention to us, that is, what prevents poland, which is building up, and the military contingent of our citizens talked about primitive strikes, but on the territory, borderlands or somewhere there are poplar mines, there is logic in these jokes. yes. eh, hmm i have. naturally, there are several such, uh, cornerstone quotes from the head

of state, which i personally noted for myself. a hmm politics is the political will of the leader. yes the question is that in the event of a threat to belarus from poland, lithuania, latvia , any other country, yes, the task of the president and the chief commander is to protect. the lives of their population of belarusians, because the poles , lithuanians, latvians and others have their own presidents, if we have sufficient information that a blow is being prepared for us, then the president, uh, and commander-in-chief. in general, he will be obliged to give the order for a preventive strike, respectively, even preparation. possibly at this blow to the poles and everyone else, there is a reason to turn off, because lukashenka has the will to give such an order alexander alexandrovich here. e. as a media manager, you probably also noticed that even according to the final materials, in principle, the most

shot was just this topic with nuclear weapons. that's how you connect it, but hmm, i really don't know, with fear of a powerful answer, or with elementary curiosity. i don't know, i still think that i believe the president. he pointed out that nuclear weapons are an element of deterrence. how much am i i guess. yes, there were plans. ah, and our fugitives have initiated all sorts of radical measures up to the use of some kind of terrorist attacks, and they are taking place on the territory of the republic of belarus, this is an element of deterrence. i believe that we have acquired a nuclear umbrella, a nuclear shield, so they have a lot of noise, but again , they react to this noise. i do not see the expediency, in principle, in principle, we protect our interests, our national interests, and our president. as the leader

said. igor is absolutely right he thinks about protection of the belarusian people and our belarusian land. and the same little look, so to speak, from the outside, yes, how does it happen? or how economic analytics is not so everything here, it's just a question. why not just a question, because, firstly, it is now being discussed. it has not yet been adopted to the concept of national security, if we use this cliché, russia has its own concept, and from the point of view of nuclear weapons, they have a triad. that is, in our concept, as far as i know, this is the option that is being discussed today. we generally there is no concept of non-prescribed elements of the use of nuclear weapons, so this is a new element that you should probably allow you to consider if we have the right to operate these nuclear weapons. and you, too, here , too, such a double fork. if you look at the statements of press secretary peskov, then he says we are posting. and in principle, said vladimir e, we place putin on the territory

and manage it ourselves now, you can be its president. you return verbs essence. well, you agreed to focus on another element of the pivot. and i also drew how direct messages to the participants of this event. uh, appeals the same lukashenko said so. you know me there, he answered the question right? i will uncontrollably or i will not give someone the opportunity to control this potential , so this is a very serious question if we say that nuclear weapons are an element of deterrence against the fugitives, who did not run about the fact that this is a preventive strike. i am very afraid that there will be no time for a preemptive strike, that is, not more precisely, not a preemptive retaliatory strike, therefore, the question here is in general the deployment of nuclear weapons - this requires its further

formalization, so to speak. it's not easy, i disagree. yes, there is. after all, when putin says that the deployment of nuclear weapons in belarus will not violate the proliferation treaty. it's clear. it's a legal country, 'cause there's one way or another, mmm. moscow seeks to comply with international treaties right to do? it is wrong when all partners do not do this. this is, in general, the business of the kremlin , but legally a weapon. nuclear will e there russian. and let's just say how it can be management. yes, you're not in a long agreement. it's about a call. hello volodya, i press. yes alexander grigorievich let's go 5 seconds. uh, a matter of discussion in full understanding of each other. if necessary, it will be written formalized. i'm sure it's certainly a question of how they really are, look. well, in fact, after all, we are talking about what the president and the head of the administration, before when he announced it. ah, the president's speech said a very good thing about his

have to be updated every day. and even now, when several days have already passed, we actually generate a wave of news and information, which, in fact, the president did not include in this message in many respects. that's why i said nuclear weapons are the most important, because it really causes a certain kind of economics . this is important and we will talk about it later, but in this case, in my case , the placement of a separate weapon is rather an element of protection. let's call it. this is the element of fear. this is an element of belarusian people. this is what i can say for sure. andrew in your opinion. look, americans. they say that putin did not fire a single shot, but used nuclear weapons. that's it with this statement, but at the same time , most of the belarusians with whom i had to communicate are sure that this is a defense and gives quite logical, uh, examples. look, when iran is enriching uranium, they don’t touch them, when the dprk

has nuclear weapons, they don’t touch them for some reason in greece germany italy belgium and holland there are american warheads and their do not touch. so it's really a certain kind. here is a protective piece element of containment. yes, i can say a provocative thing. e. why do we need nuclear weapons? well, firstly, i understand that the heads of state have repeatedly probably weighed all the pros and cons of the speech, because , but there will still be consequences, but there will be some kind of retaliatory measures and we can assume at least. and a few first. yes from the west a. the first is the increased patrolling of nuclear forces thanks to serious states, and the second is deployment of military bases, finland finland joins nato tomorrow yes , including finland did not oppose the deployment of nuclear weapons on its territory.

and if sweden, uh, prime minister magdalena slandered last year, if we speak out to nato, then we will give birth to nuclear weapons. we won’t promise foreign military bases, and finland didn’t say that, that is, finland agrees to everything. this is the second step, and the third one is the most unpleasant for us if nuclear weapons are deployed in poland and in countries last year made a statement about this, why do we need nuclear weapons, my opinion, as a military analyst. right now we see the situation in ukraine in one direction, not in the second force, in principle they are equal. uh, let's assume that russia went forward, gained strength, went forward. task. what kind of west stop from russia a certain part of the forces where to remove? yes, the reverse situation has gone ahead of ukraine's task. west, again, remove parts from russia in order to continue the offensive. in this situation, how can one do border conflict, will no longer have to fight. she will say, this is not us, this is how

it was in karabakh, how it was tajikistan kyrgyzstan will be russia will be forced part of the troops to interrupt belarus for protection, because we are, uh, a union state. this is to avoid this conflict. we have determined, in fact, nuclear weapons. that's it, they don't come here anymore. this is my opinion, you know , we are here on the previous program. we discussed whether, when, by the way, we discussed the concept of national security changes it needs the majority of the population. well, in principle, everyone should know all these subtleties and nuances. what why? why are some legal aspects unconditional? what those who are immersed need to know, of course, some basic information needs to be known, and here alexander lukashenko almost always in his messages. e, speaks not only about what is happening inside the country, yes, but also affects the context, because e perceive oneself in this world without understanding who excuse me, which side of the barricades i don’t know

who is like. in general, he evaluates himself. well maybe impossible prices alekseevna that's probably not quite your professional profile question. but just as a citizen and as well to a woman, because it is generally accepted that women are very worried about their sons and for the future of a woman. uh, everyone is for peace and and that's how important it was for you, as for belarusians, to hear an explanation about nuclear weapons, or this, in principle. well, you could have missed it. well, the right questions noted that women are probably worried about their sons, including their own. earth uh together, so i would like to. before i reflect directly on your answer , i generally note, according to my feelings, that this message was somehow quite good, kind, open sincere, you understand, well, in contrast, i personally have such an impression happened. although we listened in one breath. here he was characterized by the belarusian word. eh, human. yes, i really

don’t know 4 hours. here they open their eyes, as they say, and carefully, listening. what the head of state said on each block, and you absolutely correctly noticed. yes indeed there are different fruits of society, with which it is necessary to dive deeper and understand the chain of interconnection and actions that take place. uh, we have, for example, the armed forces there or in the border area. and someone just needs to understand. for example , today at our enterprises come, uh, sheets are calling on our men. from workshops to e service , but in order to explain what the head of state explained in simple russian, why is it so that every man can be able to, uh, there in the territorial defense troops, uh, and keep it weapons and every woman at will. he said so, he's talking about it, yes, so you know, really, this is such a comprehensive answer

to the questions. everyone already, how he perceives them and what kind of he is there, e, depth and breadth. uh, wants to hear this trace another question. but what the president is able to explain in a very accessible way and it seems to me a sense of thought, a sense of understanding of the geopolitical situation. uh, it reaches every one of our citizens in one way or another, uh, in an understandable sense, and all the actions that take place on the ground, especially small towns. they become tatyana alekseevna would like it to come with the same meanings and messages that give me the economy. that's the thing . let's, yes, so, it's very important where the women are. this is exactly what the head of state shares. yes, he tried to explain in simple terms. uh, what does the uh, closed or limited circle of the military contingent do today, what does he do most of his working time. uh,

reaching out so that every citizen understands why certain targeted decisions will be made locally, but with he said guys. that's all i do globally. give me how you say economy without economy. without a budget, there will be no social sphere, which he emphasized again. well, and accordingly, the development again with new investment cycles about the fact that the twenty-second year was a difficult sanctions, we have passed and understandably. with everything else, we , as a sect, must concentrate on the work of enterprises for their development on cooperative chains with the russian federation , what the situation has given us today and find in it only positive are these points of growth, that is, we must e with everything , as they say, peeping, what is happening on the outer contour of our entire focus on development and it is very important that it is very important to understand that last

year since february, the economy, began to slip and many sank and e. today we see that during a drawdown it is very good to give up the pace, it is very good to say that they have already given me in pairs. uh, but it's very important and the government is very clear about this, and the head of state says, you can't relax. and you need to understand that with a weak low base, you can feel like a hero. it is a must, given this drawdown. e to give honesty to yourself with your team and your entrusted industry there, e, assessment and e think. uh, among other things, how do they say failures? who we are, what we are and where we are going in the five-year plan, the city report will run for 5 years already. in fact. he spoke enough. understandable business language even for people who are just starting out. yes, here is an example from the same academy of sciences you offer not a businessman. you suggest you come up with something you know, here's something to invest. that is, you understand that in business, if you have free money , a competent person invests it in order

to develop production. an illiterate gold question that was heard at the last message, are you ready to be proactive, it turns out that you are not ready? well, i will become the protection of those who are ready to be proactive, but so far the whole system has not been rebuilt, what, uh, alexander grigorievich was talking about. pay attention. young people noticed this and many businesses, by the way, translated this positive not to miss it notes that when you are young and we are sometimes so skeptical that's young, that's very initiative sometimes initiative has risks. it’s better for us to hold our horses somewhere, because suddenly tomorrow the state control will check and these risks cannot be justified. youth, literally. talk these days. and as they say, you heard what the president said, we need to give back. you can also talk. uh, for example, in the language of street fashion, that's right , because i understand that if white promos come people say, we are ready for some kind of the simplest concept now

to invest money there to invest some interesting proposals for e. well, i don’t know, there’s something else about clothes for some reason. you will go to the meeting, because it really turns out that this is exactly what the president says when he is young. let's we are ready to work with it. what about the old case? well, one must also be able to integrate the young young. this is the perception of the real world of real business and that wisdom. unfortunately, no matter how we tried to reformat. uh, well, a certain part of the managers, well, they won't change. they are so so, that is, well, in such a format they have already got used to living earlier at one of the meetings of alexander grigorievich's absence. e flaws. now it cannot be considered a success. yes, because before it was kind of formal, but i didn’t screw up anywhere. whatever the reason, sometimes it becomes a relationship to 120 tear the youth, especially the elderly continent. well, this is the eternal thing. this is an eternal problem, but the economy is very inertial.

and if you like chinese or some the reason they constantly beat on the hat when you climb out sooner or later, like a dog, so to speak, e of this, what is her name of our physiologist. pavlova will teach you saliva. you are trying to say so, without or without sausage, this is the question here. perhaps this is a question of the head of state. when he spoke about risk, about the right to make a decision on risk, he did not divide it into young people and the elderly, he said that it is necessary to liberate the initiative, that is, to give the right to one’s own and moreover, these elements are spelled out in our legislation. there is a right to risk, there is a right, so to speak. uh, which provides. and even in the criminal code, there are articles in the economy that allow risk management, another thing is that there is a conflict in the industry when the state control committee comes. he says you didn't pay the taxes you were supposed to pay.

the pike told you for this, so that the crucian does not doze off correctly, but it is impossible to liberalize the entire economy. and you know. well, yes, and today the issue of liberating should begin with a top manager above a top manager, because they are forming today. here is the potential of 50% of the vp that exists today, yes, small business. there they give. god until the unicorn grow the company is growing today. here is the question. even the same pvt take it, which he touched upon. well, yes , show-off, there are 2 billion dollars, something didn’t like under the computer’s arm and relaxed, relaxed, more precisely, or locked it too in a new case, the same thing. this is the president's question. we need to change the way we work. this is the most important thing, yes, that is, you must relate to work, you yourself have been entrusted by the state with those that have given this opportunity. and you should treat it like it's your own. you know, it's also interesting

was to watch. here is the head of state of such a main theme. i outlined this condition for the preservation of our sovereignty. yes, there were six points, but one could assume that we would start with what? well, our economy is everything from the defense of foreign policy, it began. from unity and in essence, this is the continuation of your thought. it is relayed to all spheres of our life that where we are today largely depends on how we perceive both our tasks in our place and our country, in principle, because if a person is invested in something, even in a particular example. yes, even in your area. if he takes care of him, waters him there, then he will simply be sorry if this site, i don’t know, disappears, he will think 100 times should perceive his business as an element. here is the puzzle. yes, we are a country with a capital

letter motherland, if we are united, they blabbed to destroy this system. here is what happened in the twentieth year. yes, that is, it is exactly who is in the forest, who is under the frame, but it is very fashionable life. here, fashionable now, yes, but to focus on the fact that only i myself think only about myself. not perceiving yourself as often. here we are friends after this event. solid egocentrism in general , the philosophy of egocentrism - you know, well , it is being imposed, why, in order for the president, before the message , the slavs are soborny, this is our strength. and they want to destroy us just centrism. and now you 're talking about economics economics is very important right, but it's the paradigm of capitalism. we are building social a socially oriented state, capitalism anyway, you know, the idea, and moreover , the president spoke about the spiritual idea, and

the moral narratives of belarus that we are becoming a stronghold of real europe because we have preserved real christianity, because europe became europe thanks to christianity, you are right. well, look at the youth, yes, that is, we, well, i work just like that for that is another question alexander lukyanov, you will tell there how to work with the youth world. reformat them from youth today from refresh to those traditional values ​​that you are talking about, but this process of charka and crackling is very important. and you shouldn't laugh at this, because now people are sitting without sharks and without cracklings and without light, without electricity and without i'm talking about other countries, of course, well, everyone understands that, but we just look at minsk avenues, what kind of cars they drive belarusians and everything is getting better, it’s clear but you understand, these same machines, uh, participated in the blitzkrieg of someone else’s game, you understand,

therefore it is necessary, together with the material think about the spiritual. you know when the president talked about it. yes, when he finally came to the conclusion that we had adopted a new constitution of the supreme people's council. he was talking about a certain e, such a collective responsibility of everyone. that is, yes, there really should be an initiative. yes , you really have to bear for your site. but this should be a joint responsibility, because when the president is responsible for everything, this is also wrong. that is why there is a delegation of authority. and, probably, i spoke the same thing with i in the parties, that is, if there is any definite alternative in order to create a social lift, it should be kirill, well, we have already spoken in previous programs and in general, but the opinion about that yes, all this should be. and, when i remember, we discussed changes. in the constitution

, the opinion was often heard that maybe this is the constitution. these changes do not suit us now. they seem to grow up for belarusians. for some reason it seems to me that we we see a year later that we are really just walking to fully appreciate all these changes. and vns, including while we still have a year for the whole thing to be accepted by such mythical ones. and for most of the initiative stories, but uh, i think there's a uh year to make a uh big decision. well , i don't know, it seems to me that there is much less time thesis is defined. if you listen again later , you think, you think, why didn’t you think earlier about the conceptual more integrally with regards to the new constitution. it, of course, was not written for that time while power, glory. alexandra says to god that while lukashenka

is in the political field , he will have power, but a feature of any political system with a strong leader. this is the impossibility of forming a second strong leader. this has its upsides. this has its downsides. not the essence will be some kind of transitional stage until we all rebuild, being forced to live according to principles of democracy at the time when we have formed in the country a new strong leader but immediately. lukashenko - this is impossible, not in theory, nor in practice, and so, and so the constitution and that model of government. in my opinion, which is being developed now, alexander lukashenko conceived in order for this transitional period. and we didn't. e excessive western influence because, well, after all, and we are belarusians. well, a little not very savvy in political things, some comrades will come. the west will say, so vote for ivanov will come, any comrades any no, any comrades from all over the world, and

they will draw people's attention to their side. that is, until the moment, no matter how much we learn politically, and hmm, and we will not return the system of racks, which is laid down in the new constitution in a more democratic way with the distribution of forces, we will have this, but in general. i have already told my colleagues and before the broadcast for the slavic soul, the best form of government is an absolute monarchy. it's obvious in my opinion subjective. but the message of the head of state was touched upon in the previous parts and issues of initiative issues of interaction with youth alexander lukyanov joined us and now. uh, as we promise, as we promised yes and then i remembered that the belarusian republican youth union came out with the initiative to join the construction of khatyn museums, just the same a year ago. well, a little more already a , asking a question to the head of state after his

annual message on january 28, 22. you , alexander, came up with this initiative. i have a question. and when we talk about the same redistribution of powers and about being more proactive in order to e participate in bress. in this khatyn construction site, it was imperative for him to ask permission from the president, or it was more like that. well, i don’t know, a pr step so that as many people as possible know about your initiative. ah, i would like to note that this initiative was, of course, not mine, but of all our youth guys who worked, and obviously by their eightieth birthday. but in the message , the head of state, if you remember, noted just the same khatyn ola borki, the brest fortress should become a place of pilgrimage for our citizens, especially children, and you see, what a unique understanding of our youth, when the guys themselves then offer to announce. uh, all belarusian lines, because it's all regulated by a presidential decree. yes

, in part, it can show someone that this is not a copy of the company, and so on. you know, it's good that our youth. this is how he positions himself. and most importantly , these words are followed by concrete actions, and the assessment of the head of state, given to him by khatyn, that we are proud of the youth, especially those who worked and a number of note that representatives your tv channel. grigoriy azaryonok also worked. probably, once he came to us six times, i was almost immediately distracted by these calls, working together with the guys with students with ordinary guys. enterprises, not only as part of the student teams, the process took place, but also noting once again in response to e, it means that the question of our student team commander semyon dyulkovich, a guy of 19 years old, is a student of the belarusian state technical university and the president emphasized with such special warmth what are you to me not strangers. after all, i, uh, began my youth with the work of student teams, then it was self-evident that the president

supported this initiative. why are you asking about this, like? no, by the way, well, wait , you can noted that you can now attack here. i understand perfectly, but on the other hand. look, it's work. i understand this, this is an absolutely normal example, i'm serious. now we have begun to talk about the fact that there are certain people who can come to us with some kind of force. on either side your words are true and of people. you have to keep it somehow. we journalists will tell, but we are currently in the process of building this system for some organizations or political parties. here is the belarusian republican youth union as an example, you understand? our cover is sometimes a brightly bright screen saver, he has a cover. this is the job of blaming everything on gaidukevich. when can i add the word, belarus is the name of the guys? yes, oleg sergeevich is not offended, then. let's just say straight out that when we conditionally ask something. alexander grigoryevich, you understand what it is. all tv channels will show, all the media will tell, and all the youth of the country will know that there is

such a construction site, if we consider this issue in this way, in general, zero is the only way. here. this is the only way i understand it, it seems fine on the one hand, well, they said, they still know 100%, well, you see. same, same story. see here explaining what we do. okay let's then explain this story that happened. why would there? let's? it's generally funny, it's clear in the resurrection proposal. polyakov was voiced by the president of our the message to him said, we heard something no. work will be seen that from there we will not hear. yes, but on the other hand, again, as if there is a discussion in a good way that comes and says on sunday, people come out to me and there is such a proposal, then, in general, tear into internal political life in warsaw - this contributes to that, in general, thanks to the resurrection for this. and the fact that they don’t want to change their rank is scary for the poles. there , most of all, it was terribly crowded, which is very scary colleagues. i still return to the topic it is obvious to young people that the construction, as well as

the museums of khatyn and the reconstruction of the complex, is also possible, but the development of a new center on the territory of the kobrin fortification. this place, by the way, has serious symbolic characters - this is the northern island, the place where major gavrilov took the last battle. can you imagine that from the point of view of future generations, who, perhaps , will be brought up in this center, this is, well, a more serious historical national basis, but they will also build uxes and find an object under and an object will be erected. but when each through himself let him pass, well, let him stay there for at least a day, at least an hour, work hard, at least do something, he will have a sense of belonging not only to this line, but to the events that took place there and consolidation. yes, that is, with what the president began, that today society has grown much in consciousness in recent years in understanding what is happening? well, if we are more consolidated, and here are some of the youth at the construction site , let's introduce another innovation. yes, this is the impression. this, by the way,

right. i fully agree that it is necessary to promote. this is fine? this is fine. this is right. he says you know how to produce your relatively youth. yes, we had people like mhp, revived nttm youth enterprises, by the way, from which many oligarchs grew up, in general, this is the soviet period, so today, maybe, this is a proposal to the leader of the bpsm, maybe not only. it is promoted that i will repeat once again, this is correctly the public part of the event. or maybe we need to create something with which we started the transfer. if you are ready for some to say that he is ready to introduce innovations, this , in quotation marks, is hindering you, old farts, so let’s create youth from a settlement team and give them the opportunity to realize their idea of ​​​​the main program. you can now make an offer to the white wire and order commercial merch for yourself , not the one that is not the one that is issued.

for example, on these. yes, but, just specifically , this is just an excellent startup, perhaps, but where commerce begins, ideology ends there, because in this case yes it is possible, it has the right to absolutely agree. wait wait alexander ideology and commerce on the tv channel, how does it go hand in hand? i would like to say, that's what we have patriotism. ah, it's not easy to walk around and say slogans there let's say. so. sorry to wave flags, and so that pr is not redundant. it is necessary in the narrow current moment of time to show that there is such a force that we are patriots, but each patriot is at his workplace and not only do we think of ourselves about our family, but with the social burden on business on any field of activity taxes, of course, taxes. this is the same social programs

that are in our state. and this is the consolidation of society, this is, well, patriotism in a good sense, that they don’t shout, but it’s quiet such a variable, right. give the opportunity to create for the money started talking. we're just the villain. during the message, i will now go to the topic of patriotism. and one way or another, the president touched on this topic. and our experts, one way or another, the kanzhurfak, consulted with the head of state. how to educate journalists patriots less people will do the right thing? and then they asked questions about how to separate their values, and from ours, yes, that is, a lot of reasoning about patriotism, but in my opinion. by the way, alexander lukashenko so very humanly voiced the fact that hmm

well, probably, it flies in the minds of very many that when let's all those present in this studio say the word homeland. the word patriotism, perceives one on whom? well, that is , more or less you should not forget that there are those people who, well, they don’t understand this, you can’t you can’t make someone feel; you can’t make someone feel like a part of something where it’s good like this, but we have to convince us that you need to love your country, that you need to understand that from your every step and the word here depends more than just there even your, uh, own destiny. we, uh, don't need to convince us of this. but those who think, otherwise here are those doubting people who have not yet reached. this is the question of how to attract them, but this is also a generation, you understand, correctly, today we already understand everything. years, that, firstly, it is necessary to strengthen the work with kindergartens. correctly several times,

in my opinion, even the head of state. he indicated that only a patriot can raise a patriot and tells kindergarten teachers. wait, so we must ah. i am in the process of education. i do not know the tour to educate. yes, it is his own reception that will bring up a patriot. the same thing as attention, maybe with us and we , by the way, lived through the nineties. years of a decade when we kind of talked but were all focused on something else. that is we e someone did. eh, i tried myself in business, someone at their own enterprise, someone made a personal career, someone did it there to study, someone developed agriculture. well , everything seems to have been built, even you remember, we even had some kind of concept several times what an ideology was in response to the belarusian statehood. remember for several years looking for this whole topic. well, you know what else i also came to the conclusion. eh, when, uh, i see what is happening not only with

us. and i've been here recently. uh, in grozny, i talked with people, ordinary residents, those who survived two of these wars of the company , let's say, and when you communicate with them. how do they talk about their homeland today. this understands that people have gone through the period when they ran out of their houses at night. when they disappeared , a woman friend of mine lost her husband there, and she disappeared without a trace and lived all her life with her son and raised her and does not know where he is who they are they survived it, and they have this homeland. they understand it to the depths of their souls, to them. no need to say that they had a comparison. our task is to preserve historical memory. and that's how that period to make people understand that the peaceful sky. today, like nothing of value, and the fact that this is the homeland, yes, the homeland, that's how the homeland used to be, uh, not only the place where you really are, we are all here, people are applying a little bit,

to that creation of the homeland a certain work. yes, look here. khatyn is a symbol of the motherland. the brest fortress is a symbol of a rose, maybe next year, he will encroach on a birch potato and do something there, it will be even more, probably more serious, because the poles are nearby, and the clothes that let it go. eh, white. prom is also a symbol, a certain igor tour on tv, the stv channel - these are also symbols of the motherland that we are building, so we have in fact. now the creation of some symbolism, because how would we lay this ideology in this symbolism. we are now weaving into this story. that's all in parallel, there are symbols and some real things. here again, alexander grigoryevich at the very end says, repeat this phrase again. give me the economy and everything else. i'll do it myself earlier. he spoke, of course, defense. i will decide mine by the military. uh, be ready to defend the motherland as we are now we are used to. for which thanks to alexander grigorievich that these issues have always

been resolved by enterprises, ending with farms. i'm not offended now. well, i'm talking about well, this is how our country has nothing wrong with that. they promo have an idea to sign a contract with a turkish company. they need $3 million for that. elektron goes and asks alexander nikolayevich if it's possible. he says if there's a tv channel, relatively speaking, we also need equipment. we want we'll fight back to buy in 5 years. everything will be great. i must go to alexander grigorievich and ask alexandrovich if he can read it then. well, we have a constitution. this , in principle, exists as a military issue ; everyone in every sphere is not required to take up arms and go to defend the motherland; for this, there is an army and a commander-in-chief from all the rest. bye. in any case, the economy is required. replenishment of their duties, moreover, initiative, because it is obvious that lukashenka is alone now, well, he is very busy ensuring the security of the country. well, very hard. listen, well, here too, but you need to understand. so, when the covid began, when

the pandemic began, there were many jokes about the fact that everyone suddenly retrained as virologists, and now everyone has unanimously retrained as experts in geopolitics and economists, and uh, well, let's do this. let a simple one be given approximately on the fingers. but if i go in now, uh, into the operating room, i will need to perform surgery, but how can we imagine what will come out of this. everyone should mind his own business. here and a-a to engage in geopolitics with political global issues. well, we just can't, where is ivanovich? well, for sure, here. eh, you, like no one else, know that it’s just not that you can come to any team there, and suddenly figure out all these, uh, intricacies, well, even the simplest person cannot. what to say about big politics, when there are many different undercurrents alexander lukashenko has been in power for a decade. well, like no one understands everything, because it understands what

happens when a person comes to power unprepared, but uh with big a ambitions, yes, that's why, well, uh, here, maybe i have such an erroneous opinion, but at the same time. eh, it seems to me that with this message of his head of state. well, just like that, but clearly i indicated that, please do not interfere with me. i know what i'm doing, where i'm taking you. just trust. he doesn't even ask. he's just talking about it, because in essence. eh, thinking belarusians realize that we need a head of state in the person of alexander lukashenko now. well more than all of us to him. and i i agree, but i'll go back a little. here in my opinion. we had an erroneous concept that here i am a patriot, because here i am proud of the belarusian passport, i am not a patriot. you're just great that you're proud of your passport. i work at my place,

conscientious patriot . look, when the situation in ukraine began, tens of thousands of russians who are proud of their passports, who managed to work, fled in the country, the same thing in ukraine is proud of the ukrainian passport conscientious patriots work, where turned out to be back west, that is the top. let's put it this way, uh, patriotism is a willingness to mean one's body with weapons in one's hands , a willingness to create one's life and for this , weapons in the workplace. this is already another level. we are talking about the fact that a critical situation in a crisis we are ready to stand up for the motherland or this, as conscious conditions. there are armed forces from and other formation troops. there are territorial defenses and now there is a militia. that is, everyone can participate in this is something about what we said a little earlier. that is, i do not agree with this, that well, i think that your thesis is when it is necessary at some very critical moment, of course, it absolutely seemed, and how many adults are ready to become. uh, no need to check the time limit, check everything, let's go back to my

previous thesis about the request of the head of state. if there was one, don't interfere, because, indeed, we have gone through these last 3 years very difficult and, uh, the twentieth year. he, of course, was m-m heavy for everyone for the authorities for all kinds of sheep for everyone the layers were difficult, because there were many incomprehensible, there were a lot of difficult difficult ones, each one was determined. and there were some contentious issues. but now even those who were probably against the state power at that time they are well aware that if there were another person in the place of the president who now lives outside the country, and we would not have remained on the sidelines in this situation white rose. it would have been drawn into this war unambiguously, or at least. we've been using in some other way, but

belarus and the people would suffer very much, that is, there is no need to interfere with a really person who has vast experience, uh, who sees what is happening, uh, who makes decisions, relying, among other things, on the vision of the situation. eh, from my point of view. he is a unique politician, there are no such people left in the post-soviet state. he is the only one with this kind of experience. the fact that he makes a decision, he, in principle , speaks to the message in this, uh, and the message, probably, is why it is produced once a year on such a scale in order to people understood. and where we are, where we are going, and which way we are going, and he explains why we are going this particular way, and not others , and where we will be at some point in 3 years , in five, in 10 years. you know, here, i 'll try this question too. and i am also worried, that is, to answer this question in my own way. it seems to me that here the question even to the people

, to the people, to the parliamentarians, was an appeal with a request to entrust it to him. it's not just a message, trust me. yes, i will bring you, trust me, because really policy. especially what we are witnessing today . there is a lot to remember all the time of lukashenka's cutter insider insider. you are very thousands of sunsiders there. and this information, in principle, cannot be voiced, so, most likely, i understood the president that he is asking people. well, trust me, i will answer. i let you down. i will answer you with my words for my actions deeds. therefore, this message, including sounded. i think in this context too. look here to comment on such a story, as i understand it, yes, it was quite pragmatic asking three questions at the last message, the president, when you said that here i am in front of you to cheat with holes, who is responsible, and there were several questions and deputies. he said, ask people, especially when it comes to

families with many children. yes ask him. and when it came to, for example, the army. and when it concerned deputies. and when it came to parties, it seems that everyone was told to ask everything from everyone. so it wasn't a message. look here. i am a good president. listen to me all together and it will be like this, i 'm telling you now. no. he touched on painful topics. i touched on it, and in principle, well, i had to put it into practice in this way, because the topics that the president raised, they are not very popular, losing family benefits for the first second child is controversial, so he says, therefore, a person is ready to take fire on himself so as not to there was equalization. it is. what is this about? i say this is what our hosts say why? why didn't he do it? this is why not social experts protection?

and why is he an exceptional quality of the president? don’t interfere for the sake of it, but it’s true, because, uh, the topic, the acute topic, is sick , this is what they talk about, well, very many, even among various large families, it sounds, if we touch on the topic of why do i have five children, but i'm there uh third born to get an apartment. yes, this is also understood among themselves by someone. should have voiced it, this someone today. this is alexander lukashenko uh, why not another person. well , we probably have relations to the president sounded in the remark. e aleksandrovich gaidukevich, when the question was raised about lgbt yes, and he said, you heard that i never talk about it, and oleg sergeevich said, so i think about it, that is, in fact, the topic that is in the air and the president shouldn't say, but you see, really. you are right that the government should explain, they should explain, because

for now, well, we are still rebuilding and rebuilding with this system, but it’s bad that this is on the lgbt topic, but different sides have, let's say there are different opinions on this issue, but the activity of actions in different directions is a little so frozen that it is considered the president, but reads and here the question is as follows. and when we ah, we ask questions. we ask the president questions like a citizen of the republic of belarus, just a person, alexander lukashenko, or as the head of state, because he has repeatedly said that certain events have a certain opinion. he has like a man and has a dividend. they don't always match. he sounded like the head of state. but you can i'll change the subject a little now. eh, on the contrary, i will speak from a different position. now this is the impression, and we are leading to this that the president said, as the president, and this is in a granite, so to speak, e monumental phrase. it must

be fulfilled. and now i’ll say that phrase in his quote and vice versa, maybe it’s saponifying to the head of state, that is , i don’t know what it is, look, the quote was like this, the farther from minsk the more benefits and that’s it. i am very afraid now the local authorities will run to the presidential government in a year change benefits, like, so i'll put an end to it and add some reference information today, 80% of the territory of belarus is in one form or another of preferential benefits. this is a small- medium htp city, free trade seasons. this one from the economic freedom zone has these, that is, more is needed. that is, if we follow this path verbatim, then we will have to pay extra. soon the subject of the economy, so the question should be interpreted or the one who brought this idea is doubtful from my point of view to the president, the turnover should be formed this subsequent principle is not exempt. and

to evaluate the effects of the effectiveness of these lgovs can be reconsidered, you already understand the envy of the results. everything is right now. why am i saying that it is not necessary to immediately remember, of course, the president. and like any person, he is wrong. i understand. we are talking about making it comfortable to live in the regions, we will call it so that the regions develop not only as a capital at the expense of investment projects , or these two projects should already be evaluated for their effectiveness, understood, as i said. i so i understood differently, as i said, but many concepts, how i communicate with people now. same thing about ran. this is how our representative lev roma, the president, said the initiative. let me say so. give me now a million rubles or dollars. i 'll be sewing and dipping into sundresses. responsibility will be borne somewhere in

the district center. yes, we carry out the instructions of the president or internal institutions. they go . somehow, there are benefits in the regions, simply because there, if the benefits are there, but some enterprises are registered and live people. although in fact they have a life and work in big cities. just monetize taxes and formalize it. yes, they shouldn't. as in pvt, eternal for 20 years, as they gave me a year in 2005 and you want to take it, you fucking left, you took it, so to speak, undermined the contract, and you disoriented society and return the money right? come back that's the way to say the question, right? ah, that is, four minutes, but the head of state touched upon us already now the time of the broadcast is coming to an end, but here we summarize and, in principle, after listening to this message. and after listening well, you all, uh , you know our various experts, uh, i’ll say a banal thing, but

it’s really like a professional, everyone in their place should do their own thing. here alexander lukashenko has never let us doubt that he is a professional, as the president of the country, and the most vivid confirmation of this. this is what our greatest value is two and the world on our independent. today there is territory in our independent country, you can be sure that at least tomorrow it will be exactly and he saves, therefore, uh, i come to to the fact that m-m professional should be given the opportunity to do his job. do not distract him, let alone trifles. although he is really ready to delve into a variety of small nuances. well, listen, for so many years he did this for so many years, he showed that how to act by example, which, probably, it would be time to learn and understand, and not interpret. eh, do not take

phrases out of context and apply them somehow in such a negative sense to notation. well, i'm still, as a television man, more about the presentation, we all watched, we discuss everything. why because philosophers told me alexander lukashenko resorted to such a concept as deconstruction, that is, when he destroyed the bureaucratic approach, right? secondly, there were elements of a stand-up, as if i didn’t fit in with the president, and therefore he really acted as a people’s president. that was very. interesting