arrived in the russian capital the day before the meeting of the supreme state council of the union state, the leaders discussed a wide range of topics, in which the main place was occupied by the economy. now the countries are implementing the union program, working on import substitution , much attention is also paid to the security issues of the union state. all these topics were developed today at a meeting of the supreme state council. traditionally, this meeting is also devoted to summing up the results of the past year and a long- term plan for the future. transmission of hepatitis b midday as the head of the country office in the east noted the high results achieved thanks to the well-designed childhood immunization program in belarus, this achievement is of great importance in meeting the goals of illuminating viral hepatitis as a threat to public health throughout the european region. we worked quite a lot of time. the lord of infectious problems and you know that our mfc, by

analogy, is a small number of such institutions that half receive such a status, based on our experience, and here is the interaction in these areas to the government of the institutional block, but rather structural interaction led to the fact that when the time of the pandemic came, e, with our different approaches. uh, well, the interaction of all the blocks allowed. we have also stepped up in this direction. recent years in a very short period. life expectancy in belarus increases by four years belarus is one of the leading countries to receive the first transmission interruption certificate. electoral technologies for raising the level of electoral

culture the procedure for accreditation of media representatives was discussed today at a meeting of the central election commission. now , a center for work with the population and the electoral process is operating on the basis of the presidential academy of management. here you can gain knowledge in the field of law, psychology of communications in the classroom, specific situations that may occur at the polling station are worked out. the so-called election cycle will largely shorten the single voting day. next year, it will be held on february 25, not later than 60 days later, the first meeting of the entire belarusian people's assembly will take place. this is a fairly large asset, it covers all subjects of the electoral process. and it is no coincidence that the president's message depends on how people know the legal issues of the regulatory framework of the television house. he said that he does not remember in our history, uh, simple elections, but really everything. as far as they were complex, there were attempts to rock the country and

attempts. some sort of destabilization, situation, and so on in belarus, medical services and equipment are at the highest level , president's wife zimba told reporters in oxiliom nangagua after visiting the rspc. the mother and child delegation of the african country arrived in accordance with the agreements reached during the state visit of alexander lukashenko to harare to get acquainted with the modern equipment and services of the republican scientific and practical center. one of the steps to develop the partnership is the interest of the guests from baby food to high technologies in medicine. first lady. zimbabwe noted vast prospects to organize business cooperation between countries, zimbabs is a developing country. we do not yet have access to such method equipment or services. at the same time, there are health problems. we would be interested in seeing representatives of business circles. simbabs came to belarus to establish the necessary contacts at the same

time. we would be glad if belarusian business explored our investment opportunities italian director aldo tarabella brought a barber of seville to the bolshoi theatre, belarusian timbres will sing in the background italian pictures are now being rehearsed . russian artists have passed the casting, so feel free. we can say that the international premiere of the director will return to minsk in may. then the paper will go to work and the scenography on it is also created by the italians before the bolshoi theater of belarus, this was the fourth final premiere of the anniversary season. it will take place in june. i really like a goodwill ambassador. and for me it is a great honor surprised even shocked. what organization is the team here? i listen to the soloists and forget that they are from belarus, russia on on par with italian singers, they have excellent pronunciation.

in essence, we will talk honestly on a political talk show today about how we saw it heard, and how we understood the president's speech to parliament and the people on friday. by the way, by tv standards. it was watched by more than 2 million people. this is actually a very large figure and it is a live broadcast from the recording. well, for those who want to join our conversation. here you can see the qr code. point your smartphone at it. hello, good evening. here kirill has already said that more than 2 million people watched only on tv, but the message of the head of state. how many watched it? some phrases have already become trends , some messages have already fallen in love. uh, they quote

, they retell, but andrey ivanovich is my question. this will be addressed to you first, because together we prepared and prepared for the message, and you are one of those people who are also directly involved in preparing materials for the message that the head of state will announce. and now you know it's gone. uh, a few days since this large-scale event in the palace of the republic, as i have already said to many experts. many viewers are ordinary belarusians, they have already digested it, but hmm , for you everything has just begun, work as for an analyst. just started, and in this regard , your opinion. so you probably watched how they discuss it, including on the air, and, maybe, somewhere among people. and how accurate and correct. they understood everything that alexander lukashenko wanted to convey to the audience. alena but at first said that

a lot is involved in the preparation of the message people, so that there is no misconception that, uh, they are not so, there are not many of them. indeed, this is a number of state bodies of the state organization of the scientific organization expert and civil society. well, that is , such a pyramid, a lot from below, then less less and as a result a small group of people, uh, who clearly know what needs to be underdeveloped. well, at the top, of course, is the head of state, because he decides what he will go, he rewrites, adds and crosses out. that is, he is preparing this message for him. we help them. this is the first. and what people are discussing, of course, first of all it is the peace initiative of the head of state. and , because the president expressed the opinion, probably, of all belarusians, and people are in favor of peace for stopping this senseless one, and tens of thousands of people are dying on both sides of the massacre, but s. initiatives, in principle , recently. we know the chinese

initiative and we know the belarusian one. uh, the west rejects chinese, but they didn’t give it, as yesterday, and the minister of defense of the czech republic and yana chernokhova, she supported the initiative of china will she support the initiative of belarus, but considering relations from the west to our country, of course , publicly, it is unlikely that big politicians will declare this, but at least they heard and appreciated all this, that is, the initiative. she took her place, and the world without any conditions. without eating, they stopped, and then you start talking too. you see, these mm theses are quite unambiguous theses of alexander lukashenko for us. and on the other hand , they begin to try to interpret in some other way. why is this happening? take out of context to adapt somehow e to fit your own interests, someone is dissatisfied. somebody pleases me in general, this position surprises me, as if there the head of an independent and sovereign

state has no right to property. uh, it's just that our president has the authority he has international authority both as a politician as a leader and clinging to his opinion. it can be interpreted in any way. i think a lot of analysts are experts in political science, they've earned big fees, a paragraph of the president's speech and a huge view. that's all. well, you know, actually, i really looked at the weekend a lot too, when they talked about message, and my mind most of all cling to one topic - nuclear weapons. the world is long. this is a shame, perhaps, indeed, in the west, this is taken a little more seriously, because it is the west that spends money on the war in ukraine, but, as for nuclear weapons , despite the fact that the poles had palm sunday. i don't think they slept there at all. they talked about the fact that , well, it’s really dangerous nuclear weapons will suddenly appear in belarus and

i have a feeling that even according to some journalistic statements. and this really caused such an absolutely adequate fear on our part to be afraid . it is so highly debatable, rather, the presence of any nuclear weapon in our country rather protects us from external preventive strikes. yes, on the territory of the borderlands or somewhere there is poplar mines, there is logic in these jokes. yes? eh, hmm i have. naturally, several er, the cornerstone quotes of the head of state, which i personally noted for myself. a hmm i don't dare to say it verbatim, but there is only one indicator of foreign policy in the world - it is the political will of the leader. yes the question is that in the event of a threat

to belarus from poland, lithuania, latvia, any other country, yes , the task of the president and the chief commander is to protect the lives of their population of belarusians, because poles, lithuanians, latvians and others have their own presidents, if we have sufficient information so that we are preparing a blow, then the president, uh and commander-in-chief in general. he will be obliged to give the order for a preventive strike, respectively, even training. perhaps this blow to the poles and everyone else has a reason to turn off, because lukashenka has the will to give such an order alexander alexandrovich here. e. as a media manager, you probably also noticed that even according to the final materials, in principle, the most shot was just this topic with nuclear weapons. that's how you connect it, but i really don't know with fear of a powerful answer, or with elementary curiosity. i don't know, i still think that i believe

the president. he pointed out that nuclear weapons are an element of deterrence. i guess. yes, there were plans. ah, and uh, our fugitives have initiated all sorts of radical measures up to the use of some kind of terrorist attacks , and they are taking place on the territory of the republic of belarus, this is an element of deterrence. i think we've got a box. i do not see the expediency, in principle, in principle, we protect our interests, our national interests, and our president. as the leader said. igor is absolutely right he thinks about protection of the belarusian people and our belarusian land. and the same little look, so to speak, from the outside. yes, how to get around the townsfolk, how economic analytics is not so everything here, it's just a question. why not just a question, because, firstly, it is now being discussed. it has not yet adopted the concept of national security. speaking with this stamp, russia has its own concept from

the nuclear point of view. ah, weapons. they have a triad. that is, in our concept , how much? i know, here's an option that today is being discussed. we do not have the concept of non-prescribed elements of the use of nuclear weapons, so this is a new element that is probably worth you and multiply to consider if we have the right to control these nuclear weapons. and you, too, here, too, are such a double landing. if you look at the statements of peskov's press secretary, he says we are posting. and in principle, said vladimir e, we place putin on the territory and manage it ourselves. now vladimir said you are returning uh the essence of the voice. well, you agree, attention, another element is the core time and i also drew messages as a direct participant in this event. uh, lukashenka said the same appeal. so you

know me there for a question. he answered i am without control or i will not give someone the opportunity to manage this. potentially, therefore , this is a very serious question if we say that nuclear weapons are an element of deterrence against the fugitives, who are semi-colinese and human beings are ridiculous. i'm not saying that this is a preemptive strike. i am very afraid that there will be no time for a preemptive strike. that there is not more precisely, not screwed. and so to say formalization, how to use it? this is a difficult question, i disagree. yes, there is . after all, when putin says that the deployment of nuclear weapons in belarus will not violate the proliferation treaty. it's clear. this is the legal side, because, well, one way or another, moscow seeks to comply with the international treaty, and it does the right thing. it is wrong when all partners do not do this. in general, this is the kremlin's business, but uh, legally, nuclear weapons will be, uh, russian there. and let's just how it can

be control. yes, and i say, because not in a long agreement. it's about a call. hello volodya, i press. yes, alexander grigoryevich, let's go five. kunt goes through the issue of discussion with a full understanding of each other, if necessary, it will be formalized. i am sure that this is, of course, a question, really look, but in fact, after all, we are talking about, that's what the president and the head of the administration are talking about. before i announced, uh, the president's speech said a very good thing about having to update it every day. and even now when several days have already passed, we actually generate a wave of news and information, yes, which, in fact, the president did not include in this message in many respects. why did i say nuclear weapons are the most important, because it really causes a certain kind of fear, the economy, the economy is important, and we will talk about it later, but in this case, in my case , it’s more likely that the placement of separate weapons is an element of protection. let's call it. this is

the element of fear. this is an element of the belarusian people. this is what i can say for sure. andrey in your opinion. look, the americans are talking. that putin did not fire a single shot, but used nuclear weapons. that's it with this statement, but at the same time , most of the belarusians with whom i had to communicate are sure that this is a defense and gives quite logical, uh, examples. look, when iran is getting rich. they don’t touch uranium, when the dprk has nuclear weapons they don’t touch them. it's really a certain kind. here is a protective piece element of containment. yes , maybe a provocative thing. tell us why we we need nuclear weapons. well, first of all, i understand that the heads of state repeatedly. they probably weighed the pros and cons before taking this step, because there will still be consequences, and there will be some kind of retaliatory measures they can assume, at least. a few first, yes from the west a.

the first is the increased patrolling of nuclear forces by the reverently investigating states, and the second is the deployment of military bases in finland finland is entering into this tomorrow, yes , including finland. nuclear weapons were located on its territory. and if sweden, uh, prime minister magdalena slandered last year, if we spoke out to nato, then we will not promise nuclear weapons, and finland did not make any excuses, that is, finland agrees to everything. this is the second step, and the third one is the most unpleasant for us if nuclear weapons are deployed in poland and the baltic countries. last year a statement was made about this, why do we need nuclear weapons, my opinion, as the military analytics. right now we see the situation in ukraine in one direction, not in the second force, in principle they are equal. uh, let's say that russia went ahead, got the strength, went ahead. task. west what kind of offensive why from

russia a certain part of the forces? where to remove the front? yes, the reverse situation has gone ahead of ukraine, the task of the west is again to remove a part from russia in order to continue the offensive. what can be done in this situation? only a border conflict with a cat will not have to fight. she will say, it's not us, it's here, as it was in karabakh, as it was tajikistan , kyrgyzstan will be russia will be forced part of the troops interruptions with belarus for protection, because we have, uh, a union state. this is to avoid this conflict. we preempted, in fact, nuclear weapons. that's it, they don't come here anymore. here is my view in the previous program. and they discussed whether, when, by the way, they discussed the concept of national security, changes to it are needed by the majority of the population. well, in principle , everyone should know all these subtleties and nuances. what why? why some legal aspects are unconditional, what those who are, but immersed

need to know, certainly some basic information needs to be known, and here is alexander lukashenko in his messages. almost always. uh, he says, not only about what is happening inside the country, yes, but it also touches on the context, because u perceive yourself in this world without understanding who excuse me, uh , on which side of the barricades i don’t know who generally evaluates himself . well, probably not, because it is generally accepted that women are very worried about their sons and the future is women, uh all for peace and but how important it was for you, as for belarusians, to hear an explanation about nuclear weapons, or this, in principle. well, you could have missed it. well, the right question was noted that women probably worry about their sons, including for their native land. e together, that means i would like to. before i reflect directly on your answers, i generally note, according to my feelings, that this message was some kind

of enough e kind open sincere , you understand, well, unlike me personally such an impression. it happened. although we listened in one breath from him, he described the belarusian word. elyutskoe. yes, i really don’t know 4 hours. here they open their eyes, as they say, and carefully, listening. what the head of state said on each block, and you absolutely correctly noticed. yes, indeed , there are different layers of society that need to dive deeper and understand the chain of interconnection and actions that are taking place. uh, we have, for example, the armed forces there or in the border area. a someone just needs to understand. for example , people come to our enterprises today. eh, the sheets are calling our men from the shops to the e, service. well, in order to explain what was explained in simple russian, the head of state. what is it for, so that every man could be able to, uh,

territorial defense troops, uh, and hold this weapon at will, he said so. he talked about that too, so you know, really, this is such a comprehensive answer to the questions. everyone already, how he perceives them and what kind of he is there, e, depth and breadth. e wants to hear this trail is another matter. but what the president is able to explain in a very accessible way and it seems to me a sense of thought, a sense of understanding of the geopolitical situation. uh, it reaches every one of our citizens in one way or another , uh, in a clear sense, and all the actions that take place on the ground, especially small towns uh economy. this is the most. yes, everything is very important for women. this is exactly what the head of state shares. yes, he tried to explain in simple terms. uh what does

today, uh, closed or limited circle contingent of the military, what is he doing, what are these or those for? the decision will be made locally, but at the same time, he said, guys, that's all that i do globally. give me how you say the economy without the economy again with investment new cycles about the fact that the twenty-second year was a difficult sanctions, we have passed and it is clear. with everything else, we must , as a real sectarian federation, what gave us today, e, the situation and find in it only positive points of growth, that is, we must peeping what is happening on the outer contour of their entire focus to concentrate on development and it is very important that it is very important to understand that last year since february, the economy began to slip and many sank and e. today we see that it is very good to give pace during a drawdown, it is very

good to say that i don’t need it anymore. uh, but it's very important and the government is very clear about it. the head of state also speaks, he says, it is impossible to relax. and you need to understand that with a weak low base to feel a hero, it’s great, given this drawdown. e to give, honestly to yourself with your team from your entrusted industry there, e, assessment and e think. uh, among other things, how do they say failures? who we are, what we are and where we don’t go in five years with peas for 5 years already. in fact. he spoke in a fairly understandable business language, even for people who are just starting out. yes. here is an example from the same academy of sciences you offer non- businessmen. you suggest you have come up with something understand that's something to invest. that is , you understand that in business, if you have free money appears, a literate person invests it in order to develop production. illiterate gold discounts the question that sounded at the last message is whether you are ready to be and it doesn’t work out that you are not ready. well, i will become the protection of those who

are ready to be proactive, but so far the whole system has not been rebuilt, then what alexander gri was talking about. i paid attention and youth noticed it and many businesses. by the way, i 'll take it. that's what a positive not to miss is notes that when you eat young people and we sometimes hold our horses somewhere, because suddenly tomorrow the state control will check and these risks cannot be justified. youth, literally. these days we are talking - as they say, you heard what the president said, here we need to give slime. you can also talk. uh, for example, in the language of street fashion, right. because i understand that if i say, their promo people come, they say, we are ready for some kind of the simplest concept. now investing money there to invest some interesting proposals. the president speaks young. let's we are ready to work with it, and what to do with the old? well , one must also be able to integrate the young young. this is the perception of the real

world of real business and that wisdom. unfortunately, no matter how hard we try to reformat. uh, well, a certain part of the managers, well, they won't change. they are so so, that is, well, in such a format they have already got used to living earlier at one of the meetings of alexander grigorievich's absence. e flaws. now it cannot be considered a success. yes, because before it was kind of formal, but nowhere messed up. what kind of relationship sometimes becomes, as if tearing apart the youth, especially the elderly contingent. well, this is the most eternal problem, but the economy is very inertial. and if you, like a chinese or some kind of parable, are constantly beaten on the hat, when you climb out, sooner or later, like a dog, so to speak, e of this, what is his name, our physiologist will teach you saliva, you are trying to carry without sausage or without it's a question here . perhaps this is a question of the head of state.

when he spoke about the risk about the right of acceptance he did not divide the solution of risk . he spoke of the need for a liberator of initiative, that is, to give the right to the youth and the elderly, and moreover, these elements are prescribed in our legislation. there is a right to risk , there is a right, so to speak. uh provides. and even in the criminal code in the economy of the criminal code there are articles that allow risk management, another thing is that there is a sectoral conflict comes to the state control committee. he says you didn't pay the taxes you were supposed to pay. you were told for this pike, so that crucian carp do not dozed off correctly, but it is impossible to liberalize the entire economy. and you know. well, yes, and today the issue of liberating should begin with the top manager of higher tokens, because they are forming today. here is the potential of 50% of the vp that exists today, yes, small business. there

they give. god until the unicorn grow the company is growing today. here is the question. even the same pvt take it, which he touched upon. well, yes , show-off, there are 2 billion dollars, something didn’t like under the computer’s arm and relaxed, relaxed, more precisely, and also relaxed in a new case, the same thing. and that's the president's question. we need to change the way we work. this is the most important thing, yes, that is, you must relate to work, you have entrusted yourself to the state and gave you the opportunity to do this. and you should treat it like it's your own. you know, it was also interesting to watch. here is the head of state such an eye of the main topic. i outlined this condition for the preservation of our sovereignty. yes, there were six points. well, we could assume that we would start with what? well, everything about our economy is from and the foreign policy equipment she started. from unity and in essence, this is the continuation of your thought. it is relayed to

all spheres of our life that, or even our country, in principle, because if a person invests in something, even on a private example, yes, even behind his own plot. if he takes care of him, watches over him there, then he will simply be sorry if this site, i don’t know, collapses and disappears. he will think a hundred times about how to perceive his business as an element. here is the puzzle. yes, we are a country with a capital letter motherland, if we are united, they will loosen up or destroy this system. here is what happened in the twentieth year. yes, that is, it is precisely who is in the forest, who is under the firewood. this is a very fashionable life. well, it’s fashionable now, yes, but to focus on the fact that only i myself think only about myself, without perceiving myself. as part here. wait. here we are acquaintances of this event. sheer egocentrism is interrupted, in general , the philosophy of egocentrism - you know that, well

, it is being imposed, why in order for the president, uh, to say before the message the slavs are conciliar in this our strength. and these centrisms want to destroy us. and now you're talking about economics economics is very important right, but it's the paradigm of capitalism. we are building a socially socially oriented state. anyway, capitalism understands the idea, and moreover, for the first time the president spoke about the spiritual idea, and the moral narratives of belarus that we are becoming a stronghold of real europe because we have preserved real christianity, because europe has become europe thanks to christians, you are right. well, look at the youth, yes, that is, we, well, i while they are reformatted from the youth today to reformat all the values ​​and the traditional that you say. but this process of charka and crackling is very important.

and you shouldn’t laugh at this, because now people are sitting without sharks and cracklings and without electricity, without electricity, of course, well, everyone understands that, but we just need to look at the minsk avenues, what kind of cars belarusians drive and everything becomes, understandable but you understand, these same machines, uh, participated in the blitzkrieg of someone else's game, you understand, therefore, it is necessary to think about the spiritual along with the material. you know when the president talked about it. yes, when he finally came to the conclusion that we had adopted a new constitution of the supreme people's council. he spoke of a certain, but such a cumulative responsibility of everyone. that is. yes, there really must be an initiative. yes, you really have to bear for your site. but it should be a joint responsibility, because when the president is responsible for everything, it is also. that's right. that's why there's delegation of authority, there's a story about what is vns.

and, probably, i spoke the same thing with i in the parties, that is, if there is any definite alternative in order to create a social lift, it should be kirill, well, we have already spoken in previous programs and in general, but the opinion about that yes, all this should be. and when i remember discussing changes. in the constitution , the opinion was very often expressed that maybe this is the constitution. these changes are not suitable for us now. they seem to grow for the belarusians. for some reason it seems to me because of what we see in a year later, that we are really just walking to fully appreciate all these changes. and vns, including so far this. well, we still have a year to accept the whole thing so mythical for the majority. history of the initiative. well, i think that hmm there is a year to make an important decision, well , i don’t know,

it seems to me that there is much less time in which he sometimes prepares us for a year for two for three, because his thesis is defined. if you then listen to it again, you think, that's what you think, why didn't you think before the conceptual more integrally with regards to the new constitution. it, of course, was written not at that time while the authorities. uh, thank god alexander grigorievich lukashenko will have power while he is in the political field , but a feature of any political system with a strong leader. this is the impossibility of forming a second strong leader. this has its upsides. this has its downsides. not the point will be some kind of transition until we all we will not rebuild, being forced to live according to the principles of democracy until a certain new strong leader is formed in our country, but immediately after lukashenka this is impossible. not in theory. not in practice, so here, and so the constitution and there is a model. state in my opinion, which is being developed now, alexander lukashenko conceived in order to but this transitional

period. and we didn't. to excessive western influence, because, well, after all, and we are belarusians, well, a little not very savvy in political things, some comrades. the west will say, so vote, any comrades will come for ivanov, any comrades from all over the world will come to me, and they will draw people's attention to their side. that is, it is possible in the new constitution to be more democratic with the distribution of forces, we will have this, but in general. i have already told my colleagues and before the broadcast for the slavic soul, the best form of government is an absolute monarchy. this is obvious in my opinion subjective. basically, we are discussing. we touched upon the message of the head of state in the previous parts and issues of the initiative interaction with young people , alexander lukyanov joined us and now.

eh, as we promise, as we promised, yes and then i remembered that the belarusian republican youth union came out with the initiative to join the construction of khatyn museums, just the same a year ago. well, a little more already a, asking a question to the head of state after his annual message on january 28, 22 . you, alexander, came up with this initiative. i have a question. and when we talk about the same redistribution of powers and about being more proactive to you in order to participate in bresma in this khatyn construction site had to ask permission from the president, or was it more like that. well don't know pr move that was as many people as possible found out about your initiative. ah, i would like to note that this initiative was, of course, not mine, but of all our youth guys who worked, and obviously by their eightieth birthday. but in the message, the head of state, if you remember, noted, just the same khatyn ola borki, the brest

fortress should become a place of pilgrimage for our citizens, especially children, and you see, what a unique understanding of our youth, when the guys themselves then offer to announce. uh, all belarusian lines, because it's all regulated by a presidential decree. yes , in part, it can show someone that this is some kind of pr company and so on. you know, it's good that our youth. this is how he positions himself. and most importantly, these words are followed by concrete actions, and the assessment of the head of state, given to him by khatyn, that we are proud of our six came to us almost immediately, responding to these calls, working together with the guys with students with ordinary guys with enterprises, not only as part of student teams, a process was taking place, but once again noting in response. on uh, it means the question of our student detachment commander spadzhin semyon dyulkovich, a guy of 19 years old - these are students of the belarusian state technical university and the president emphasized with such special warmth

that you are not strangers to me. after all, i, uh, began my youth just the same with the work of student teams. well, even then it was self-evident that the president would support this initiative. why ask about it? well wait you can noted that you can i'm in defense now that's attacking. i understand perfectly, but on the other hand. look, it's work. i understand this, this is an absolutely normal example , i’m talking seriously. now we have begun to talk about the fact that there are certain people who can come to us with some kind of force. on either side of your words, the truth, and people. you have to keep it somehow. we are journalists, we will tell, but a public organization or political parties. so now we are in the process of building this system. here is the belarusian republican youth union as an example let's have us the cover sometimes this sergeevich is not offended. then let us tell you directly that when we conditionally ask alexander grigorievich something, we understand that all tv channels will show it, all the media will tell and all the youth of the country will know that there is

such a construction site, if we consider this issue in this way, in general zero just like that. here. this is the only way i understand it, it seems fine on the one hand, well, they said, they still know 100%, well, you see. same story. look, we are embarrassed to explain what we are doing. okay, let's explain this story with a message then. he said we heard something no. work will be obvious that from there we will not hear. yes, but on the other hand, again, as if there is a discussion in a good way that comes and says on sunday, people come out to me and there is such a proposal, then , in general, tear into internal political life in warsaw - this contributes to that, in general, thanks to the resurrection for this. and the fact that they don’t want to change their pochebu from the category is scary for the poles. there, most of all, it was terribly crowded, which is very scary colleagues. she still returning to the topic of youth, it is obvious that the construction, as well as the museums of khatyn or the construction of the complex, is also possible, but the development of a new center on the territory

of the kobrin fortification. this place, by the way, has serious symbolic characters - this is the northern island, the place where major gavrilov took the last battle. can you imagine that from the point of view of future generations, who , perhaps, will be brought up in this center , this is, well, straight, but more seriously, a historical national basis, but it will also build a university. and they will find under and an object will be erected. but when let everyone pass through himself, well, let him stay there for at least a day, at least an hour, work hard, at least do something, he will have a sense of belonging not only to this line, but to the events that are there in consciousness, understanding what is happening? well, if we are more consolidated, and here are some of the youth settings, let's bring in another innovation. yes, this is the impression. this, by the way, is correct. i fully agree with him that it is necessary to promote. this is fine? this is fine. this is right. yes, you know how to sell your relative youth. yes, we had people like mhp, youth are returning to

ntm enterprises, by the way, from which many oligarchs grew up, in general, this is the soviet period, so today, perhaps, this is a proposal to the leader of the bpsm. maybe not only pr, which i will repeat once again. this is right, a public part, or maybe you need to create, then why did we start the program, if you are ready for some kind of innovation, so to speak, you are ready to introduce it and the old people, old farts, in quotation marks, are preventing you from creating youth from the settlement team and give them the opportunity of resources to realize their money. you can now make an offer for a white hole and order yourself a commercial merch, not the one that is not the one that they give out . for example, on these yes, but just specifically commerce ideology ends there, because in this case , yes, perhaps it has an image. i would like

to say, that's what we have patriotism. ah, it's not easy to walk there let's say. so. sorry waving flags, and that pr is radio-piano and not too much is important. it is necessary to show in a narrow current moment of time that there is such a force that we are patriots, but each patriot is at his workplace and not only we think about ourselves about our family, but with the social burden on business in any field of activity taxes, of course, taxes. this is the same social programs that are in our state. and this is the consolidation of society, this is, well, patriotism in a good sense, that they don’t shout quietly this mixing of money. well, in my quite right opportunities. already at the time

of the message. i will now go to the topic of patriotism. and one way or another, the president touched on this topic. and our experts, one way or another , the kanzhurfak, consulted with the head of state. how to educate journalists patriots less people will do the right thing? and then they asked questions about how to separate their values, and from ours, yes, that is, uh hmm well, probably hovering in the minds of so many that when let's all those present in this studio say the word homeland. the word patriotism is perceived in the same way. well that is, more or less we should not forget that there are those people who don’t understand this . that convince us. e

is that you need to love your country, because you need to understand that they will refuse yours. a step and a word here depends more than just there , even your uh, your own destiny. we, uh , don't need to convince us of this. but those who think, otherwise, here are those doubting people, those which have not yet arrived. so the question is how to attract them? well, this is also a generation of fruit several times, in my opinion, even the head of state. he indicated that only a patriot can raise a patriot and tells kindergarten teachers. wait, so we must ah. i am in the process of education. i do not know the tour to educate. yes, it is by his own example that he will bring up as a patriot the same thing that we can have and we, by the way, lived through the nineties of the decade, when we seemed to say, but were all focused not on this, that is, we someone did. eh, i tried myself in business,

someone at their enterprise, someone made a personal career, someone did it, others answered there. remember the belarusian statehood for several years looking for this whole topic. well, well, you know what else i came to the same conclusion. eh, when, uh, i see what is happening not only with us. and i 've been here recently. uh, in grozny i talked to people. eh, ordinary residents are those who survived these two wars of the company, let's say, and when you communicate with them, and how they talk about their homeland today. it understands that people have gone through the period when they ran out of their houses at night, when they disappeared , a woman of her acquaintance lost her husband there, and she understands her to the depths of her soul without a trace, they don’t need to be told, because they had a comparison. our task is to preserve historical memory. and so, how are you of that period, so that people understand that the peaceful sky today is like nothing of value and that this motherland yes

, the motherland, here, as before, the motherland is not only a place where you really are, we are all here here people are applying a little bit, to that creation motherland a certain job. yes. here, look , khatyn is a symbol of the motherland. the brest fortress is a symbol. maybe next year you can eat potatoes on a birch tree and do something there, it will be even more, probably more serious, because the poles are nearby, and the clothes that let it through. eh, white. prom is also a symbol, a certain igor here on tv, the stv channel - these are also symbols of that homeland. we build, so we have in fact. now the creation of some symbolism, because how would we lay this ideology in this symbolism. we are now weaving into this history. that's all, in parallel with the symbolism , there are some real things. here again , alexander grigoryevich at the very end says, repeat this phrase again. give me the economy and everything else. i'll do it myself earlier. he spoke commercial defense. i'll deal with

the military. uh, be ready to defend the motherland as we are now we are used to. for which thanks to alexander grigorievich that he himself always solved these issues, starting with enterprises, ending with farms. i'm not offended now. well, i'm talking about everyone. we have a country in this there is nothing wrong. they promo have an idea to sign a contract with a turkish company. there is a need for it. there are 3 million dollars of electricity going there asks alexander that is, you can. he says, it is possible, if there is some kind of tv channel, relatively speaking, we also need equipment. we want to buy, and there we fight in 5 years. everything will be cool. we must go to alexander grigoryevich to ask. in short, you can read it to study in every area, you do not need to take up arms and go to defend the motherland, for this there is an army and a commander-in-chief from all the rest. bye. in in any case, the economy is required to fulfill its duties, moreover, initiative , because it is obvious that lukashenka alone is now, well, firmly busy with ensuring the country's security. well, very hard. listen , well, here too, but you need to understand. so, when

the covid began, when the pandemic began , there were many jokes about the fact that everyone suddenly retrained as virologists. and now all friendly have retrained experts. yes, politicians, economists, and, well, let's do this. let the simple around on the fingers translated. but if i go in now, i'm going to need surgery. but how can we imagine that you will come out of this . everyone should mind their own business. here's what to do. ate politics political global issues, but we just can't where ivanovic is for sure. here, uh, you, like no one else, know that it’s just not that you come to any team there, and suddenly figure out all these uh, intricacies, well, even the simplest person cannot. what to say about big politics when there are many various undercurrents alexander lukashenko has been in power for a decade. well, as no one

understands this, he sees everything and understands what happens when a person comes to power who is not prepared, but, uh, with great ambitions. yes, therefore, well, uh, here, maybe i have such an erroneous opinion, but at the same time. eh, it seems to me that with this message of his head of state. well, just like that, but clearly i indicated that, please do not interfere with me. i know what i'm doing, where i 'm taking you. just trust. he doesn't even ask. he's just talking about it, because in essence. eh, thinking belarusians realize that we need a head of state in the person of alexander lukashenko now. well more than all of us to him. and i agree, but i'll go back a little. here in my opinion. we had an erroneous concept that here i am a patriot, because here i am proud of the belarusian passport, i am not a patriot. you're just great that you're proud of your passport. i

'm working at my place, conscientious patriot no, well done, you're a worker with your workplace. see when it started the situation in ukraine tens of thousands of russians who are proud of their passports, who managed to work ran away in the country the same thing in ukraine are proud of the ukrainian passport work conscientious patriots, where they ended up back west, that is, the top. let's just say, uh, patriotism is the willingness to protect one's body with weapons in one's hands. willingness to create your life and for this weapon in the workplace. this is already another level. we are talking about the fact that a critical situation in a crisis we are ready to defend the motherland or is it, as conscious conditions. there are armed forces from other troops of the formation. there are territorial defenses and now there is a militia. that is, with everyone can participate in this, this is what we talked about a little earlier. that is, i do not agree with this, that well, i believe that your thesis is when it is necessary at some very critical moment. yes, sure. as for the previous thesis about the request of the head of state, if

there was one, do not interfere, because , indeed, we have gone through these last 3 years very difficult and, uh, the twentieth year. it was, of course, mm heavy for everyone for the authorities for the vegetable grower for all strata it was difficult, because there was a lot of incomprehensible, there was a lot of hard difficult, everyone was determined. and there were some contentious issues. but now, even those who opposed the state power at that time, they are well aware that if there had been another person in the place of the president, who now lives outside the country, and we would not stand aside in this situation. and already belarus would be all out, there is this war clearly, or at least. we're using it in some other way. uh, but belarus and people would suffer very much, that is, there is no need to interfere with a really person

who has vast experience, uh, who sees what is happening, uh, who makes a decision, relying, among other things, on the vision of the situation. eh, from my point of view. he is a unique politician, there are no such people left in the post-soviet state. he is the only one with this kind of experience. the fact that he decides he, uh, in principle, on the message about it and says, uh, and the message, probably, for this it is produced once a year on such a scale so that people understand. and where we are, where we are going, and which way we are going, and he explains why we are going this particular way, and not others , and where we will be at some point in 3 years , in five, in 10 years. you know, i'm also trying to answer this question, which also worries me, that is, to answer this question in my own way. it seems to me that here the question even to the people , to the people, to the parliamentarians, was an appeal with a request to entrust it to him. it's not just how

message, trust me. yes, i'll reproduce trust me, because it's really politics. especially the fact that today we are witnesses there remember a lot, all the time the incisor, lukashenka i say, insider insider. there are thousands of you there and this is matza, it, in principle, cannot be voiced, therefore, most likely, i understood the president that he is asking people. well, trust me, i will answer. i let you down. i will answer you with my words for my actions deeds. therefore, this message, including sounded. it seems to me that this context. look here to comment on such a story, as i understand it, yes , it was quite pragmatic asking three questions at the last message, president, when you said that here i am in front of you openings on let's you have some kind of responsibility, and here there were several questions and mp. he said, ask people, especially when the question concerned large families, yes, ask them and when it concerned, for example, the army. and when it

concerned deputies. and when it came to parties to all it was to everything it was said ask at all. so it wasn't a message. look, i'm a good president. listen to me all together and it will be like this, i'm talking to him now. no. he touched on painful topics. he touched on and, in principle, well, i had to find, because the topics that the president raised, they are not very popular losing family allowance for the first second child is controversial, so he says the poet our presenters why he is why wrong this is why not social protection and why he really and the quality of e president don't bother for the sake of it, but it's true, because a topic an acute topic, a sick one, is what they talk about. well, very many, even among different large families it sounds, if we touch on this topic about why i have five children, but

i am there, uh, the third one is born to get an apartment. yes, they understand it too. all i massaged among themselves someone had to voice it. this is someone today, this is alexander lukashenko why not another person? probably we have a relationship with the president sounded in the remark. e alexandrovich gaidukevich, when the question was about lgbt yes, and he said, you heard that i was talking about it i never say it, but oleg sergeevich said , so i think about it, that is, in fact, a topic that is in the air and the president should speak, but you understand, in fact. you are right that the government should explain, because so far, well, we have been reorganizing different opinions on this issue, but the activity of actions in different directions has all froze a little so much that it is considered the president. yep, i

think that's how it works. and here is the next question. and when we ah, ask questions president, we ask him questions like a citizen of the republic of belarus is just a person with alexander lukashenko or as a head of state, because he has repeatedly said that he has certain opinions about certain events, as a person. yes, uh-huh well, he voiced a very message as the head of state. but can i change the subject a little and now, uh, on the contrary, i will speak from a different position. now this is the impression, and we are leading to this that the president said, as the president, and this is in granite, so to speak, e monumental phrase. it must be fulfilled. and now i’ll say that phrase in his quote and vice versa, maybe it’s saponifying to the head of state, that is, i don’t know what it is, look , the quote was like this, the farther from minsk the more benefits and that’s it. i am very afraid now that the local authorities will run and

change benefits for the president in a year, like, yes, i will put an end to it and introduce some background information today in 80% of the territory of the free trade zone. this one with a zone of economic freedom has these, that is, more is needed. that is, if we are on this path let's go to. literally, you will have to pay extra. soon the subject of the economy, so the question is to be interpreted or the one who brought this idea, which from my point of view is doubtful to the president, on the contrary, it is necessary to form it according to the following principle of no benefits. and evaluate the effects of the effectiveness of these lgov and may be reconsidered. these people are already dependent on the results. everything is right now. that's what i 'm saying, that it is not necessary to immediately fulfill the word of the president. and like any person, he is wrong. i understand this is the thesis of the president, we are talking about the fact that you were also in the regions

we will call it a comfortable life. this is so in order to evaluate not only the capitals at the expense of investors. but if you understood, as i said, i now understood it differently, as i said. well, many do. i do communicate with people. the same, he ran. that's how they say, our representatives of the industry, the president said with the initiative somewhere in the regional center. yes, we are fulfilling the instructions of the president, or internal investments are on the way. well, somehow there are privileges in the regions, simply because there, if there are privileges, there, uh, some enterprises are registered and people live. although according to in fact, they have a life and work in big cities. it's just that it is necessary to pay less taxes to monetize and formalize these years. yes, they should not be, as in htp, eternal for 20 years, as they gave me a year in 2005 and you want to take you, damn it, left, you took it, so to speak, undermined the contract, and you

differentiated society and return the money. right? come back that's how it is necessary to say a small aspect yes, that is, four hours, three four, minutes, touched, the head of state. we've already reached the end of the broadcast. well, let's summarize principle, after listening to this message, and after listening , you know all of you, our various experts, but i’ll say a banal thing, but this is really a professional, everyone in his place should do his own thing exclusively. here, alexander lukashenko never let him doubt that he is a professional, as the president of the country, and the most striking confirmation of this is that our greatest value is two e, peace in our independent territory in our independent country. today you can be sure of that for sure at least tomorrow he will be. and he

saves, so uh, i come to the conclusion that the um professional should be given the opportunity to do his job. do not distract him, not only on trifles, although, uh, he is really ready to delve into a variety of small nuances. well, listen to this thing for so many years. so many concepts, not to interpret. uh, don't take phrases out of context and apply them somehow in such a negative sense and connotation. well, i still, as a television man, more about the presentation, we all watched, we discuss everything. why because philosophers told me alexander lukashenko resorted to such an understanding, how much to deconstruction, that is, when did he destroy the bureaucratic approach? yes, the second there were elements of stand-up, as it were, the president does not seem to fit, and therefore he really acted as a people's president. it was very. interesting information struggle and

clashes in the dialogue it is on journalists a huge layer of responsibility they fix the reality a new format of international relations, where every step has a diplomatic significance these