you can be you not where i am, without you, i can live it all, my stupid love, but we don’t have it, it couldn’t be different , you can be wrong losing you, i can live. it's all love, mine, love for her without love. you are my other feelings and you lived not about me, lord, maybe even your happy was suffocating, the love of emptiness did not hold anything these days. that's all, my love. e

bow to be turned around to be. you lose you in the summer i can live. it's all my stupid love, but we couldn't not have it fly you. i can live. it's all your group, mine.

everything is ready my stupid how can you be? you, i can live it's all love, my stupid, but with us it's all my stupid,

but not to be. every day we experience a million emotions. we can be happy, angry, surprised, sad, sometimes our emotions. we are not subject to, and music expresses our emotions much more strongly.

this emotional force literally takes back, and has already hit. in us. it becomes an integral part of life. for the secret of music lies in what it finds an inexhaustible source of expression, where speech is music instead of a thousand.

hello the club of editors on tv channels belarus 1 belarus 24, as always, we are discussing the most important topic of the walking week - what is being discussed in the country and in the world already by tradition. let me introduce you today to the guests who came to our studio today at 600 m. we are at nine, as always, according to our good tradition, we start, that is, with dmitry trk, the world in belarus and the head of the belarusian women's union aleksey belyaev until the end of the faculty of journalism of the bsu candidates of historical sciences one borovik is a political scientist of the council of the belarusian committee of youth organizations and piotr petrovsky political scientist. good evening. thank you very much for coming to our studio today. where do we start, of course, with the vgs, the highest

soviet union state, the president of belarus, alexander lukashenko, went flying to moscow and spent two days holding negotiations there. let me start. that's what i'm not an extremist, but i hope. in the area of ​​​​the international situation, warta does not act out of position. now the yanas cannot afford public sprays. uh, mercury is the fifth korsavik, i am beautiful to this topic and there was an illuminated discussion of the lukashenka, and either putin or they sat there until two in the morning and diluted. uh, yak will be transported nuclear from here to here, having elected on the territory of belarus. but in fact, representatives of the kremlin dmitry peskov commented. i also do not understand that the decision has been made to discuss. uh, the mines of the races are mothballed, probably under construction in a storage facility. well, as far as i know the hint it was probably, in plain text , it was said that the planes e with the appropriate aircraft ammunition

redone. what else can be discussed? what color to paint when such statements have already been made, it’s clear well, this lord, i moreover discussed issues and, in principle , an algorithm was developed how to react to that militarization to that aggression to that nato fist that they create, because you don’t think we are here that we are returning nuclear weapons. this is a reaction to their expansion, and its return to the territory of our country. yes, in fact we do, everything is within the framework. e international law. here's a look when they give in the comments. it's like we can't they live badly. you look at how much bile sarcasm, apparently cockroaches cannot eradicate with their own from this low level to blather at the highest authority of the union state , it’s not at all to comment on its level. he doesn't understand any of this, not at all. i remember, even here some

channels sinned, therefore, that's harmful. uh, already 3 minutes have been dedicated, they decided to take even the most interesting things on our broadcasts, what he said so, and some channels are the same channels as the channels through which they will not, probably they if there is still such a mindless nuclear weapon, belarus is provoking exactly a blow to lukashenka and thrushes. well, if he is a liberal , we are propagandists of the evatics, and he is a liberal democrat, that is, if you listen to the liberal democrats, so we have every right to strike at the residences of the president of turkey, germany, holland well, they have american nuclear weapons deployed well, why the dutch can an american nuclear to place weapons on our planes, but we can’t russian. what are you, people are still young in that if there is a complete substitution there is no concept, the target. we are now, when

weapons appear, no one here. it won't invade and won't start fighting, but all this rhetoric is connected with what the guys simply don't know how to respond to this step. look, they don’t know, they are a little confused, so they need to be told to pronounce this problem, but from the fact that they will pronounce the real situation. come on, look at our situation, what was we convinced. here i remember the beginning of the twentieth year very well. in the spring then there were already two whole reports of a wonderful uh such a rent a corporation of an american uh research firm think tank think tank, which is closely affiliated with the pentagon, is doing research for the us military on how best to conquer the world there to impose the opinion that belarus should very quickly become neutral, like switzerland like austria i was on several conferences that we

have organized here, and they promoted this idea. it’s just that a separate anti-russian state was offered to us here, in general, it was russia should go beyond dkb. and we should become such a prosperous island among all the rest of this crazy europe, and what if we went along this path, yes today, when it comes to the fact that tactical nuclear weapons can be deployed on the territory of belarus. that's absolutely right. it is necessary to clarify a few theses, what vadim is talking about is that, firstly, we act exclusively strictly within the framework of the agreement of international law and they are trying to hang us with the fact that we have deployed our nuclear weapons in third countries weapon. if an american is allowed why can't we? well, yes, if they can, then we will do the same, but many, many, many years later , plus to this, when we talk about the movement of weapons on the territory of belarus. what was also said was that the control of these weapons. all the same, no one is talking about the transfer of the red button of the nuclear

suitcase to russia. and there is a system. they think crazy that the neck, despite the name tactical nuclear weapons, it is nuclear and it is strategic, because it is actually the decision on its use is made by the top leadership, that is, in fact, by the head of the russian federation, but taking into account the interests of belarus, the filled interests of lukashenka said that all weapons that are in belarus are used with permission and even about the president's team under control. yes, the belarusian side, of course. it can be the same nuclear and about. yes, one more important point should be noted about the deployment, belarus and russia are allies within the union state. we have a regional unified grouping of troops. on

on the basis of numerous documents , we have long entered because of belarus and actually control the situation and was ready to defend belarus in 7 methods, including the use of its military space forces with all the following circumstances. but, for example, a weapon that someone will confuse us with, it will definitely be a scientific weapon, a weapon. yes, one moment 30 seconds, what do we need to know? this is what we will do now, we are doing what we need, and it doesn’t matter who imposes what on us, but these are all the contract is valid. so it really is true. well, look at the system of international law is a ruin and there is nothing to make excuses and look back at it, we all come out to the world, but look at nuclear weapons, not with an ally, for example. russia russia and in

the occupied state they introduced nuclear weapons and keep it there for a decade. this is fundamentally different from the us nuclear bombs located at six air bases in five countries of the european union now. yes, this is germany , italy, belgium, the netherlands and turkey, but it is and is. i am here we are really a lot now we are telling should not be. er, why are we doing this? why do we owe only to ourselves and our people, we must do everything to ensure that our country remains sovereign sovereign and independent, and today what is happening is happening precisely because it was asked, because it must remain sovereign independent and have, and the opportunity to be such is always absolute and by what we place not without regard. this speaks of our sovereignty so here are two points of the line in europe nato troops and we are strengthening and the second political you understand, that is, we are giving a signal that our intention is the most serious any aggression in us will meet with

a crushing response. this step is again underlined by 10, because when the enemy sees that he will be dealt unacceptable damage. he refrains from aggression, but belarusians must understand. we take the deployment of tactical nuclear weapons on our territory very seriously. we do not rattle them and we do everything strictly within the framework of international law. basically, if we listened attentively to the president, it was the president in moscow who said that he was generally opposed to nuclear weapons, that he was ready. he was in favor of temporarily trusting all nuclear weapons. i just found out that there is someone to talk to him, it’s interesting, so that france’s macron says that nuclear weapons should be completely excluded from the conflict in ukraine. we also think so. i am sure that in no case can nuclear weapons be deployed outside the territory of a nuclear power. particularly in europe, he hints wow. he hints that we did not hold on to the nuclear, which means that we cannot mark up the question again.

on what grounds in holland turkey germany still the ranks of the country's infrastructure for accommodation is possible or is it designed for an internal audience for the french, who will not ask such questions and do not delve into uh especially this, but he cannot help but know this. you see, now, too, a limited operator has a certain value. that's what they say, we are the chinese of the country 160, that's not western. yes, my dears, you tried to build after the collapse the ussr is a unipolar world. here are the americans who want something to corrupt yugoslavia iraq afghanistan and other countries. and now we see the conflict in ukraine and they say argenti where they were when there was a second congress war. yes, 5 million people died, sanctions were not imposed, you supplied weapons here at the same time, that is, they say, here they are white bone blue. a blood pith helmet is possible, but you, my dears, you are

second grade, third grade fourth grade, this is typical nazism and racism in geopolitical terms, a good example of double standards. here europe is a man who, for 82,000 euros , takes off his watch under the table, discussing pension reform and saying, be patient for 8. well, this is a collection of watches. you understand, this is the cheapest water. no, no more was told. here, respectively, or in the cold war, and they say, listen to the end. today we explained to them that the winners ended this business. today we, uh, have risen, roughly speaking. eh, today the ministers of foreign affairs of our states do not go for advice. let's just say that washington today the chinese look differently and even india and a number of other countries, and they should already get used to the fact that the world has changed and in such a way after the beginning and this is the second such example, when a powerful blow was dealt to the unipolar west, they did not ask. the minister of foreign affairs of india, he said very well

about the ukrainian conflict. he said that when problems arise in the west, those problems should, uh, be solved by the whole world. and when there are problems all over the world, then the west of them, of course . let's hear how the president of belarus commented on macron's words about that it was not worth placing nuclear weapons in such countries. to perhaps be surprised, the macron said that no country has the right to place nuclear weapons on the territory of another country. nuclear weapons to americans from five or six countries where they have them stationed, period. but i'm generally a radical in this regard. i believe that nuclear weapons should be brought together in one heap in one heap to destroy them within uh, literally some time. that's all, and chatting, like, like this our comrade knows how to do. well here are all the specialists, so let's

put it all together and destroy it. this is the best option. in the meantime, we are doing the way they do but even something to be surprised by the macron, if here is the last example again. let's remember the law on a foreign agent , which was adopted in georgia , they began to clobber georgia, e, the state department started riots, condemned when he condemned the most interesting situation , nuclear weapons have not yet appeared on the territory of belarus. yes, from where, as far as we know , due to open. i think it's on airplanes. eh, installed. i think i'm guessing. i don't know anything there. well, the effect is already there. here's everything that you can not enter. yes , everything that we are discussing. this is the effect. it just happened in the minds of your own eyes, since you can’t lead, you need to lead, as you say, on the side of the opponents of the authorities. they

say, you say, that this is a manifestation of sovereignty. they say that these are losses, that putin is not asked here for nuclear weapons. yes, two big things. first, look how a reacts, and lukashenka when the message i had such an emotional perception - this is the strength of confidence in calmness knows where it is going. look, putin and lukashenka are talking calmly. interviews give a calmly balanced clear understanding of the situation. and there panic china semi marginal threat statements, so right. if you say, so you have already introduced all the sanctions that are possible, what sanctions have already shot all those legs, where will you shoot yourself in the head, and regarding here they gave them a backlog of time. this is a political step, you understand, not only military-tactical news, and this political we gave for the matter of time until july 1 to come to their senses. many countries have also begun to declare that they are restricting the supply of weapons. feedback has already gone to ukraine. first,

nothing. secondly, he is already starting to adjust his behavior a little. that is, in this context and with regard to our friends who call on their homeland to bomb, but ivan mikhailovich will definitely treat the patient. i will be told lead the emotional edge. he, of course, that we all support this decision, but i would like the viewers say, and we will definitely find it over the course of three years, we in the club of editors would have predicted that it should be done, and not because a decision has now been made and we all began to applaud. this, in our general opinion , followed from what is happening near our borders and constriction. e troops. i know we talked with the generals, you were also present. well, it was impossible to understand why it was done. you, look here is a flight map, uh, around russia and belarus, so it wasn’t any of its own, the result was not it was 20 years old, it became obvious that they were preparing, as it turned out today, you

were preparing, well, you can treat it differently, but the allant merkel poroshenko said that they had been dragging on for 8 years. uh, they stretched out the pause in order to arm ukraine, they trained it. why did you train in order to return it by military means, you remembered about the rent. i saw there, uh, those reports and a lot about it. eh, it says. they offered us to become a neutral side and withdraw from all allied associations. yes, and including the most interested in the general grouping of troops. naturally. well, if we went out, this is the first step, what would it be. uh, the next in the next stage, of course, we would break off all relations with russia and our services to us, who would offer the military sphere strange. west weapons base instructors are the same. wait what happened in ukraine how it ended in ukraine we all know perfectly well that a retraction would be inevitable. in my opinion, according to me or not

conflict. here, look , two scandinavian countries had a neutral status six months ago, sweden yes, today what gives the status a nato member is that military units and bases can be located there. whose well not german true? yes, right now, on the borders of our exercises in the baltic states, which are now being worked out, an offensive movement in our direction. what should we do in this situation? just silently observe what is happening or still show. excuse the teeth for the expression and yet shows that we will fight back. in case. if there will be something to threaten our son. oil prices plus put would have ruined their entire industry, they would have lost the russian market, and then they would have crawled on their knees, but the european ones did not work out. thank

god we have a sober view of the leader. and , in principle, the power that we do not give strategic allies, firstly, and secondly, we understand that why should we take steps that make us weaker. we would have destroyed yes, the foundation of the conceivability of economies. and many here have media executives political scientists have been participations. how many years we have been talking about the fact that belarus, uh, wants to be friends with both this is the famous multipolarity. i met from russians. europeans on the mountain vector. questions were not asked here or are you with us or with them? it was i who personally participated in a dozen negotiations along the line. media by american european politicians. now we are saying that we are ready to close. uh, russian channels. remove the russian language. if you have to understand that the path to neutrality, belarus is the path to neutralization in general. look

now the reformatting of international relations is in full swing, a new geopolitical realities blocs, and uh, the countries , on the contrary, refuse the status of no, the most she froze russian ancient neutrality turned out to be fake today during the second world neutral truth. yes, you have the gold and money of the nile, what we are doing, that is, the integration of the eurasian collective east , joining the sco, that is, the formation of a new system of international relations -something must allow uh-huh. here look. that's what we are talking about the idea used to get used to colleagues. here we say ours, we say that this is an enemy union, that's right. it is said that nato countries collectively protect each other. they are now creating more and more this team, which in this case is not aimed at protection, but which included those

territories that we were promised would never enter nato. i'm talking about countries. here, alexei viktorovich, i can ask you one question. forgive me for interrupting the program for the second time to say which country the aggressive bloc is targeting. why are you say they protect each other, they are committed, so i want you to understand that annual exercises are held within the framework of the nato bloc. yeah , which are connected with the development of nuclear war. this is what we started with, that is, they every year for a decade. these exercises are working out a nuclear strike. and the last one was a month ago. they worked out the bombing in st. petersburg from german cities. well, doomsday planes sounded, which were supposed to bomb, in theory, st. petersburg can be bombed, they scream about that russia sent troops to belarus and uh,

occupied belarus deprived us of sovereignty. poland tearfully begged trump. give us fort trump, send us american troops. create your permanent contingent base here - this is different. didn't create it, then biden created ford biden. it's been around for a few months now too. eh, and these people. yes, they are trying to tell us how we will need independent sovereigns, who we are afraid of, what we are afraid of, we should be afraid of russia for our sovereignty, but now i am protecting just a second, the first vector and for the belarusians to understand allowed us to strengthen our contractual positions. hmm, in many uh, that means at many historical stages. we are like average, a european state. a kingdom with an open economy, in principle, cannot be, if we want to be a confident non-multi-vector country relying on different ones in china and so on. that is, it is normal. and by the way, i'm very uh, that's the way i feel about it. uh, well,

let's just say with incomprehension, when some experts even our brothers and the russians us criticize. here is belarus with this model, that is, let's see, what's wrong if belarus earned 80% of me 18 billion euros in europe in ukraine and so on, and we could buy oil products for this money for this money, including modernize industry and, by the way, that is, when our ally is stronger economic, uh, it’s better than ours and it’s beneficial for us that russia has the opportunity to trade anywhere in the world and our allied state will be strong when there are the least for us limitation, however. we understand that today they turned their backs on us and closed the markets for us. and we're not going to put our hands up. we will work under the prevailing circumstances. it is very interesting all these which we are now discussing, but i would like to ask some western politicians, public figures, including the representative of e, but, unfortunately, these people, uh, do not want to, uh,

communicate and answer your questions. no matter how many times we have applied for interviews to the leaders of european countries and to the european parliament and european governments, no desire to answer, how much i personally would give these two examples of macron. it's interesting what i can say, for example, that for example, if you want to, for example , media data holders from non-friendly countries, as they say, you can simply prohibit asking uncomfortable questions in politics. you are ready for the knowledge stronger, or maybe in your rating to lower it is better not to enter into negotiations with him. by the way, it is clear that some kind of politics was once done, how western politicians give interviews and how they react to questions that gribovskaya agreed upon, remember.

activists of the nationalist movement and in for a certain period of time he was on the side of certain nationalist forces, but it turned out at that time, about which he speaks, he was a member of the communist

party and this piece of life. look, we are talking about economic security. in fact, a lot. i just know so to speak and not the official sources of natural journalists. worked, including that of course it was about the economy. i would like that the president of belarus is even recorded here somewhere. first time said we'll talk no more about what needs to be done, and let's summarize. what is this important? perhaps we sought to stray. uh, sometimes with the head, but they could break through the wall. i mean, uh, the russian federation was beginning to be implemented, there was no happiness, many people helped. there, russia confessed that the lower ones , many turned out to be empty, they need to be filled. and i also talk a lot. i see what is happening awareness and thank god it is bad that, of course, that we cannot trade with europe in full in this way. if from those with those, but you know that it's impossible, yes if we could trade a little with europe, then we would not have succeeded with russia from russia here, you have to choose 28

allied programs implemented by 80% those, the most goods are trade with services. e 50 billion dollars, by the way, if i'm not mistaken, we have a positive balance. uh, first time reached. yes, and the record falls, yes, yes, which we not only fulfilled, we overfulfilled them, for example, also imports. uh, the substitution of the second point is the edge of the operation. uh, those items that were on our roadmaps. e, by many points were no longer relevant after february 24. they were filled in a new way, expanded and deepened. and that's when we say 80%, uh, we've completed some road work. here, as it were, here is what we should say and belarus within the framework of the union state, within the framework of the ne, it is a strategically critical matter. yes, microelectronics. uh, optics machine structure. yes, in the end. let's just talk about

ordinary medical tourniquets. this is what belarus supplies today and will provide it a strategically important moment for the russian economy. it is very important not to, of course, to praise enough problems. we know that there is inflation. although decisions were made to discuss yes, inflation and the dollar. uh, went up a little, although the russians explain this topic, well , different uh, and uh, yes different, they have uh arguments about why it happened including there i asked this story yes , the company that has a huge amount of cash is leaving , e washes out of the russian market. and did you know that with the influx of real money dollar currency on the territory of russia there are problems reducing this turnover from the west . that's it with a peg to the dollar and an increase in the exchange rate, it is leveled. come on, in the russian federation, in the russian federation, the dollar is no longer in first place, in general

, russian assets have been converted into yuan, right? well, of course, to navigate very quickly and we, in principle, the belarusians. here, too, by the way, in order not to lag behind, one must understand these trends. yes. it is clear that the dollar will still be the dominant currency for some time, because the whole world keeps in dollars. e its foreign exchange reserves. first of all, not even america. others are afraid that the dollar will depreciate, that it will no longer be a real reserve world currency. but the fact that already at the official level in 2016 the yuan was included in this basket, from an international point of view , we focus our trade primarily on the asian markets asian markets. all are connected. with china we must also understand very clearly which currency is becoming more promising for us. with europe, we trade in euros , the united states, the trade turnover of belarus has always been scanty. that is, as such, the dollar, for example, we need only in settlements with distant countries. and here, at the moment, energy resources with russia were calculated

here, in general, the belarusian ruble is the russian ruble in these calculations. that is, it will be, uh, what we have now, certain exchange rate fluctuations. it must be understood that in the conditions of political military-economic turbulence this will always be the case, that is, the population will also have certain fears, as it were, some people will try to keep the currencies they still know and do some reserves. well, it's all extremely temporary extremely short-lived. i also want to add that, for example, the same russians, ordinary russians , ordinary people have long been untied. they do not pay attention to dollar fluctuations, they consider russian rubles that the state needs dollars went beyond st. petersburg, you understand, so it's clear that america is with its own. lost with us dollars. here's another look. now it happened just a few days ago, and the actual decoupling of oil trade from the dollar between saudi arabia and china, the saudis are one of the largest

e-suppliers china of black gold plus russia and in these commercial transactions the dollar will be absent, that from the russian side, what to say freely 2 dollars will appear. yes well, look what, well, i n- called the problems that we have in gdp, in my opinion, the decline this year, meanwhile yesterday , in my opinion, i saw the world bank. e, the forecast has been corrected for belarus, it promises plus 0.6% next year, e to say that corrections are already taking place and even prime minister golovchenko has already stated that by the end of february march it will not be a minus, at least. it begins to restore the people, therefore. you just need to appreciate it, because well, it’s a sin to hide russia is, in fact, in a state of war not with ukraine, quite a nato bloc, we have somewhere close to thousands of sanctions and not packages, but dozens of more than a dozen

packages of sanctions. uh, remember the famous authoritative hmm economists, such as yaroslav romanchuk, the movement of the dollar by that time, they decide what really, and the dollar at 20 would already be anything, anything could be at 30 anything happens in life and it was it is calculated to state what we have today, uh, the exchange rate and forecasts for uh, gdp, and we see there uh for a penny. yes, but a good trend for gasoline has already begun to become cheaper, in my opinion, it has been there for four weeks in a row. i saw this news slipped on belarus bank lowering rates somewhere. well, in a wild crisis, of course, such decisions. i wouldn’t accept it, it’s all good for us. i literally spoke to a realtor before coming here. uh girl who has nothing to do at all. they don't understand politics there. in all these global moments. she works as a realtor. she said that now, uh, loans

for the purchase of housing have become cheaper and the market has revived and revived, because some of the transactions go through lending, because loans from its layer have already been taken. they will also pay them easier, because they are tied to the refinancing rate. that is, well, as if there is movement and it is absolute. well, plus it is clear that the price of food products gasoline per penny but in the price of food products. it's not a penny. it is much more, because it is transportation. yes, and there are not liters, but large tens of liters. uh, they are calculated gathered here and watered. this is crucian carp, they trade there. and let's listen to the american senator and we don't live in shops , we don't go to the shops and we don't pay in rubles. i mean as far as there uh. ba- great economy senator, republican and jack. let's hear him comment brazil, which is the largest nation in the western hemisphere south of us

, has entered into a trade agreement with china on which they decided to trade from now on in their national currencies, bypassing the dollar. these countries are creating a parallel economy completely independent of the united states in just 5 years. we will no longer be able to dictate anything to anyone with sanctions, because by that time there will be so many countries trading with their own money, and not with the dollar, that we simply will not be able to impose sanctions on all of them. i now thank you to say to this senator. he convinced us that all is well. yes, i can tell you one brilliant quote elderly. yes, biden girl, such a cute extravagant is commented. yes, drunk as she commented might be concerned. the transition of brazil, china to national currencies in mutual settlements is a violation of the rights of our citizens, who rely on a stable dollar exchange rate in the world, we must do well, we

must turn on such a vacuum cleaner sucking plums from another country that you ensure the well-being of our listen. what is an american doing? in general , it was clear to all belarusians. they have created the perfect a financial pyramid, when they simply understand obligations, obligations are air , air is not paper, you will only print 5% and you will print it yourself. but in principle, in general , figures do not even print money on the computer, and, accordingly, assets appear. that is, it is for sale. that is, we provide real labor power, real production units. some go to them. they just have the power on the account numbers on the account. they also have a strong economy. why do high technologies and so on have this, and what do they do? first they are in the regions? and what are they? they admit the union of states and they don't . uh, respectively, the merging of economies. why did they hit their ally in quotes in the european union because these are the regions

that offered an alternative currency, because what is south korea japan these are countries that were under us occupation and are economically dependent on, uh, the european union economies, operation against germany began after 10 years later, germany after reunification began to play first fiddle in the eu started these centers of rapid power and began a project to strengthen poland against germany's counterbalance when they saw that poland was still growing on germany , the driving forces continued. they began to withdraw from the eu to the uk, that is, imagine that they have no allies, and they have a theory, uh, a theory prescribed, spoken by many secretaries of state, politicians, political scientists that we are organizing controlled chaos. our task is not to win the war. our task is to weaken so much. so that for a decade ahead he will not could compete today for their challenge. here is to weaken the legion in europe to the european union , the russian federation, the next china - he says - therefore we must understand their bad luck today, so that ukraine or russia

will win. their task is to destabilize the situation so that this region could not compete and create in the future. uh, competing centers of power. here 's some confirmation of your words. maybe not everyone paid attention to this, in continuation of what i said, that even france is already trading in yuanisk. china visit macron to china his meeting. e with xingping, but they talked about ukraine. well, said, only macrons, somewhere, among other things airbus and louis vuitton for that matter. yes, these branded things came in order to build something to negotiate and build a new economy, that is, france is the side that holds its nose to the wind and understands that it is already necessary to navigate, uh, there and know with whom to trade, to not as you rightly said they blur. your economy and not be on your knees at all let's just say that old europe which seemed. oh, in what a difficult situation, when the three pillars of, uh, the european

, uh, miracle are knocked out from under their feet, yes, and it is crippling thanks to american help, but now they were forced to. and the last pillar is the chinese workforce, the disciplined chinese industry, which provided, including european components, the europeans are well aware, and moreover, they now have a task in a situation where it is unprofitable to keep the industry there, so that at least not all of this industry fled to the united states of america and great britain so scholz, when sitting pin, she chose the first where hanging from the europeans. made it by scholtz, ex-morgango. this main point was on the northern belt road, but on the other side. why are those us satellites open poland baltic they are trying to close the border, because through belarus we are the bottleneck of germany,

and er france, er, exactly. here again i will confirm and peter a long time ago. i already mentioned this and said that sooner or later the poles will close the border. uh, west across the territory. yes, dad the border of belarus with the east, and the reason will be found, as we see. uh, a reason has been found, well, the order of the second honor, well, it’s not the poles who order music, yes, yes, well, anyway, here you need to understand that this trend, which is, uh, when moving european productions, then what salt has gone, and there about 50 billion euros are ready to invest european firms in china directly transfer their production there. no 50 china discovers and er, the same, for example, volkswagen already. in fact, he moved a number of his productions to china without america yes, this also suggests that, well , the poles, firstly, it will be very difficult

to resist here, because american help. it is also not infinite. here the only thing they will achieve, most likely, is that they will get a new almost military confrontation within their own nat bloc. when poland has to fight again with germany, she risks this very much, because all her behavior, which they are now demonstrating and presenting reparations of which -something absolutely wild germany for world war ii and claims that e germany is there something in general should e already for the soviet period. where are they supposedly exploiting someone here, too. here are claims to host and become a hub of american weapons and manpower to turn into such a local dictator. all this will eventually lead to confrontation. already within europe but we don’t forget that the world is big and the silk road that runs through the territory of belarus is, of course, very important for us that it is the land part

of maritime trade communications today it is almost impossible to close europe anyway will continue to trade. so, uh, who wins in this regard , those who bet on the growing second still win. or maybe channel one. let’s move on about ukraine, we haven’t talked about ukraine today and haven’t and won’t and won’t, but everything is stable in ukraine. you know, yes, there are operations. we are not specifically discussing a military operation. disinformation is one of the main components of the vision of any military operations. it’s possible to broadcast something like that , so that later you won’t wait, what to do with it, you need to look at the border on the map. uh, battle results, and then uh, political stuff. yes, they are interested in the struggle going on , almost strangled by the orthodox, this is the understanding of oneself, as a people, what is called identi. that is speech, commonwealth 2.0 is impossible. not in vain. uh, zelensky came to the dude and said that we should restore speech to the commonwealth. and now we see that through

the ukrainian orthodox church this speech, the commonwealth , is being restored, because in 1.596 the orthodox church of the commonwealth experienced the same thing; it was banned from ukraine. well, look at peter in general. uh when we compare the situation. here it is necessary to understand. religion certainly does not play the same role today as it played there in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. and now this is one of the strokes of how, anyway, ukraine has actually already reformatted, destroyed the self-consciousness of its citizens, it has changed , that is, the current ones who live in ukraine, those who are forced to exist under the current ukrainian regime, citizens of the basis of the protection of the orthodox church. our red church was closed for repairs. they promise to return him, what 's going on, how much does a grenade cost there something that he throws with gas inside the temple during worship. they do it and they get it

out. this further confirms those who wait, yes, everything is clear here, but remember that, uh, what is happening now with slava and what is happening with the church of the russian patriarchy. yes orthodox. they have their own orthodox spill. thomas received not so long ago not from scratch. here, yes, who killed their neighbors, including belarusians. both polyakov and poles. first of all, they also remember very well. uh-huh and don't throw it away accounts. zelensky understands this as well. i am very concerned, and i am not satisfied with the fact that in ukraine there are more with us. 1.000 km of the border is dominated by the point of view that kills the neighbors normally. and what is the mistake of the ukrainian leadership? they made several decisions, or allowed

the connivance of radicalization and the split of society, after all, such an attitude. they financed and cultivated it. well, the mistakes were passing the wrong bandera ukraine yes at the time of the message. again, the president, back to the message, spoke very subtly about many issues, they also touched on gender issues and religious issues, and so on, on which he emphasizes that the state must somewhere be silent and somewhere you must insist on your point of view. somewhere it is necessary to behave very flexible on the outside , and also a balance must be maintained inside. it is necessary to behave very subtly with hatred, hostility, planting some kind of hostility in some social groups - this leads to war. this is what we have to carry in the form of examples here in the south. here. well what kind of desolation is uh. how many camps existed in the west of ukraine nationalists? god didn’t bring them up where to chop them, but the people of the nazis, well, i don’t know, can call a person a nazi who has a swastika on hitler’s chest

. well, you can have video proof of the photo. all on nationalistic grounds. and once again i want to remind you that when there was an attempted coup here in 1920, that side published what it was called? well, okay, uh, the future of the new u belarus is one of the uh, most er, there were high-profile main points. this is what will be formed in belarus into a cephalic church, that is, there will be a break with e-russian borders. why do young thugs do this by gassing the temple. we had enough of them. you saw them on the glass, and especially the next day on pretenskaya. now imagine in minsk in our cathedral in the old city. believers would come to wring it out, that schismatics are not about the church. it's about politics. they go to the temple. believe there banderi or find someone else. you look at concerts. yes they take over the temples. they are not holding services there, but they are holding political actions, that is, their task is through

reformatting. uh, there e jurisdiction, through schisms, remake the orthodox world, too, e, infiltrate inside the orthodox church and reform it. well, this is such a definite modernist direction. and these political scientists - it's a misfortune to kill and destroy such people. well, such words. see what's happening. here they are already e priests. we've got some in here that tumbled. uh, the twentieth year was forbidden in the ministry, because you understand that they ran away from the district law and that's all, because these are political actions - this is an attempt to undermine, including our spirituality in our ideology, our goal. and you can yes, too, i will be brief and all the time has gone. ha ha, there are several things more important than belittling and destroying others. this is a linguistic strife, the introduction of one language from the prohibition of others. this is a church

schism, the introduction of some special state church. now. look at what we have in belarus, how wise we really are. 1995. we had a referendum on language, where clearly said. the belarusian russian is absolutely equal to us in this division, and no one will allow the leadership of the state now. here we were on the message, right in front of us. yes, we’re driving, four representatives of all key faiths, orthodoxy, catholicism, judaism and islam , were sitting right next to each other, they had absolutely no desire to fight there, quarrel among themselves, and we periodically emphasize that our church is at least separated from the state, but all of them the state respects our traditional church. that is nationalism. glory be to that discord to religious discord in belarus, god was put in time to block it, and today it’s from the ukrainian conflict and the ukrainian tragedy.

i think we should once again relearn the lessons we already understood them, but once again we need to fix this for ourselves, very clearly, as soon as a split occurs along one line, it will go further along the rest of the country and plunge the country into chaos into a civil war. i want to congratulate everyone on a good orthodox holiday, which is called the annunciation. yes, now let's move on to another topics. i just remembered the information i'm looking for his last name i can't okay what to listen to and young people who are here like uh, they are for the belarusian language, as if we are against it. true, none of them, for the most part , did anything for him. at least we have stations for the culture of this belarusian language and a tv channel in the belarusian language , we also have concerts, we shoot with his participation and organize. uh, i flew in europe and the whole poet is famous and talented. what to say? said, well, they're just so active you think during the transfer flight, in my opinion, in amsterdam and a flight to brussels where at least one of them said a word in

belarusian, i then returned here and turned to them, naming their names. you will have the right to teach us the belarusian language, well , the introduction of the belarusian language into life only when they fly to brussels on an airplane will speak belarusian to each other, and not pure russian . well, for them, the language and the question of language understood the political, and not that they can . we love him. i'm sure of it, but i also love you know, that's the big question for me. do they love if they politicize like this and use somehow the same thing they didn’t do with the language with the coat of arms and with this state language, and you don’t need to politicize it and you don’t have to think that if a person speaks the belarusian language, he some wrong views. they love belarus called bombing. belarus they do not like the language and do not like. they are belarusians. these are traitors to the national, except for themselves so, but the muscles do not like themselves come. i'm talking about ukraine, which started

another terrorist attack in st. petersburg. yah, we know, and from closed reports, including reports, we share information, in general, with us, but ukraine is obvious, this is obvious. but i can confirm this from the sources with whom i communicate, it finally became e. the path of terrorism. uh, this is one of the last chances to undermine the situation in russia and belarus, because on the battlefield it doesn’t work out already in the 21st century, you can’t close the loopholes, there is and go to terror. well, we remember the last case in grodno yes, i'm not claiming that it has not been proven that it was a ukrainian trace yes, uh, a man was shooting back to prevent a terrorist attack, but can you guess who? well, it is known for sure that there is an explosion in machulishchi. uh, the sbu recently made a film, we were doing the first materials, too, deeply immersed. in principle, in the cinema, everything was scheduled by the minute to be done by the security service of ukraine. imagine if you still didn’t recognize zelensky’s regime as terrorist, but already, and already forgot all the facts.

let's remember avtohovich somehow hush up this film, which is a man. it was the twentieth year they were preparing, uh, for terrorist activities. markova montyan, in my opinion, said that avakov thousands of militants were responsible for the coup in belarus, of course, they were then forgiven, although they had to be given there, to everyone, where they came from, and who called the protest action when the cars overturned the water academy, we went out instructed that our citizens do not have the right to test. only when we saw that we saw our citizens, similar to ukrainians in a clutch, and so on, we look at lukovich. it's clear. why is the autohovich so persistently looking for weapons and a car and the house was blown up with the help of improvised devices and the autohovich was not alone

accomplices at once, several people in different cities and with different roles, some used the dark one, without revealing the true intentions three explosions in three weeks for a calm and peaceful belarus - this is an emergency not of a regional republican scale, especially when the target is the police this time in grodno, an riot police officer and his family, and vtukhovich carefully prepared for each attack, he urgently needed a weapon, and in order to speed up the process of obtaining it. messages are flying to ukraine. here are fragments of his correspondence from the telegram messenger, which he details who should be the next target for the house. here he is himself. the car is all the same to the employee’s family, the child

, by a lucky chance, did not succeed in planting explosives in the house, the dog only suffered the car . zhodino minsk, he is ambitious and categorical, he discussed the option of using a hand-held anti-tank grenade launcher of the muhammu type to the cause of the past of the year. we shared our experience with him. there were no weapons. there was no terrorism in our experience of the fourteenth year semenchenko, his famous speech in court, where he said that the security service

of ukraine trained militants on the territory of ukraine, which half of the tatars are widely discussed on the topic who believed him, er, authoritative sources say that a certain roman popkov you must have heard this information. let's show what happened to anyone of this girl, this man verbalized her. please note that he was detained in minsk in 2020 for participation, and in the act of protest of the seventy-eighth year on from bryansk, for the first time on august 27, he introduced himself in deka, a journalist from mbaha media then issued a warning. yes, khodorkovsky i'm talking about the so-called russian journalists , the terrorist court, on november 7, was detained . the winners received 15 days. uh, i left later and was banned from exile for 10 years. uh, to our country. what is the essence of all the time they asked for him in the russian federation and not only for this person, and some were released from me. e

what supposedly happened here. here is the terrorist attack they have an indirect fault. you know , there is one among particularly liberal circles. uh, such a curious moment that they have word of mouth working, they write to them like this poor unfortunate person was detained. if the journalists of the journalist fit in with uh, the teacher will find anyone. sign up, sign up, they sign up, they don't even understand. who is it - for what reason was he detained? that is, they have such an ideological solidarity , it is, in fact, complete carelessness irresponsibility. they create an information ram, they try to put pressure on the same sophia sophia yes. until now, someone bakes, what is it needed? transfer somewhere free the rest, we must understand now there is a geopolitical war and such useful idiots, there is no other way to call it. these are

the main pests. yes, it’s good that they are still a tudur who blew up, they called a journalist, they didn’t find any of her publications, you take any experiment. you give him a journalist, supposedly a certificate. uh, as a result, he delayed the whole european, the press writes that they were detained. ah, journalists. see what they are like what headlines were. they recognized him as politically connected. yes look at this daria, see what headlines she was there and an activist and a pacifist and a participant in a protest action against whom she always goes. another cover operation is being prepared, including an informational cover. in general, you need to look carefully carefully in general, you don’t need to make a fuss about it, but in russia you still need to work in counterintelligence, but look because for those who ask a lot of questions. e for a whole series aspects and introduction of this military operation and information work and so on. you don't have to blame anyone. and there is no need

to announce anything, because you are watching. that's what i'm talking about, we even talked about this terrorist, so look how it is now. uh, what kind of forces, i can’t understand, but they are inciting this interethnic role in russia , an orthodox church is not being built there , remembers that the statement was already coming from a person participating in a special military operation that we will defend. i'm talking about we don't intervene. in general, we, uh, respect the russian federation, even though we are allies. we will not interfere with internal affairs. well, it's just that the accents have melted and now is not the time for any discord. we must, among other things , work on counterintelligence inside to see who these processes are from the inside, because these are all details. i would like now, i would now like to turn to alexei krich, belyaev to kahn of the faculty of journalism jellyfish i will not name the name of very authoritative people in the republic of belarus extremists from a well-known portal to study in your time. well, they quoted me that they read while

listening to this edition. it is free to attack. what do you think, in a quotation mark the word terrorist attack is necessary was necessary. yes , they wrote a terrorist attack, but in quotation marks it takes little time to write, they could write non-life therapy wrote after the explosion of the car. he wrote that the machine was damaged in grodno after it was blown up. yes, a propagandist was somehow killed. why don't they understand why? well, this is, of course, the approach. uh, the use of a journalist. here is the medusa. they then cried that they did not give to work in the baltics why are they there, they came there such freedom fighters, they are forbidden to work there in russian and almost kicked them out of there. only brussels stood up for them already and forced the enemies to allow them to work then. they are just enemies. these are not journalists. let's start with this. let's remember again. i remember this studio very well, when today we

recalled to valery karbolevich a great specialist who had a phd thesis. i read its name, i didn’t remember exactly something from discharge the role of the communist party in raising milk yields, there volozhin region. i swear the pace. so, after that, he began to work in the american region of the year and began to pour mud on his country of great specialists. here, right here, in this place , karboliyevich was sitting, they were sitting opposite. we were present here, comrades of syria, when there was this entire syrian company, yes, yes, and here he began to unharness. what good fellows the americans are to bomb syria, they almost killed him, these are the syrians. here it was on state television, never once. media like our niva like their tutbaevs. never reached out to me, never took me to any comment, anything the journalists say here. who is here for freedom of speech because of different opinions? let's do it anyway.

i waited for a long time until alexei viktorovich finished . i want to commit a terrorist act against 40 people who were at that moment in the room among these forty. e people who were there were a fourteen year old girl. if this is not an act of terrorism, but the guys have then what's next, like her. this is daria yes hurt badly. soon man. there he fights for his own interests. it would be yes to return, but she walked and understood that all the people who are with her in the room will become victims of this terrorist comrade. they talk about high feelings from the topic , but in fact, the task of these people is to introduce fear into our society. how by killing members? head of the society but

the jellyfish and similar importers carry out this ideology in life, because from them you encourage from their point of view. they are heroes, they must be heroized, of course, it is impossible punish. this is the element when the information war becomes part of a real war in which people die at the end of the program. i have 4 minutes left. yes, at least everyone knows how the prince, who glorified soviet cows. suddenly he became a political scientist. that's all. eh, very simple. well, we know that there are numerous things about funding for rnc. uh , we heard the story of the information courier, they are independent there, and uh, honestly, so to speak, e and the publication, which they now have problems with there, seems to be delayed. well, the minsk truth did it. uh, an investigation into the work of the information couriers, which became quite active in 1920. and suddenly he began to devote a lot of time to the international environment , documents signed by the director and on this version of sergei stakevich ruko.

or the case of the press katrin ostrovsky, adviser to the german embassy in minsk, was essentially on the content of the publication at the german embassy , ​​and the publications were published under special headings for inter-news of germany, fellow countrymen covering the news of germany, the resistance of belarus to germany, nothing bad about it, so far at that time no, but in the seventeenth year 1.400 euros received 18 19 20 1.200 euros. uh, why u are punished for peaceful rallies is an opinion.