orff what conditions must be observed, yes, and after your opinion, well, the fact is that now there are certain ones on the front line. let a small but definite initiative belongs to the russian side. in addition, the russian side has already participated in the negotiations. uh, it means that the original ones were the minsk agreements, which are like 8 years later. we learned that it was a way of such a screen to delay time, to chat the russian side at that time to arm itself, then the russian side participated in the negotiations or a crisis of confidence, which does not allow trying. uh, to chat , drag out and do some meanness, so, of course, the russian side. hey representatives. so the journalists were wary of this, but from the point of view of diplomacy. uh, absolutely correct approach absolutely correct proposal, because the whole world should once again see. who

offers peace, and who does not agree to it, agrees, it means that the russian government. uh, so, uh, somehow critical of the president of belarus to his proposal. no, well, it broke. yes, more moreover, the expert community forgets that russia has never refused negotiations, the president spoke about this in a message, and president e. here. what is unique about this proposal is that, unlike western world leaders, who talk a lot about peace, the president not only speaks, he proposes and does to ensure that there is peace in ukraine on his own and is not able to make a decision. e about the start of copper negotiations and negotiations. would have started this a long time ago. hmm really. need to the ukrainian people are not given, and the president spoke about this in russia as well. that's how i see it, on the contrary, who understands it in politics? who understands what is behind the words of the president, and behind it is the support of russia

in all undertakings and the cover of the union state from the west, because in the complex in the complex they simply take the words of the president, forgetting what belarus is doing in matters of joint defense of western guns is one topic. so that is our question. therefore, we some experts forget about it. they talk about mines forget about initiatives. what belarus is doing to ensure the security of the ukrainian side, zelensky’s office was ashamed and told no. so, the adviser to the head of the office, mikhail podolyak, called the proposal plan ridiculous. and you're not with a verdict. this is completely unacceptable, because it confirms the words that they don’t think about the ukrainian people, because the president has said everything. for me, in this sentence, it was precisely the key emotional that was his. that's what a president should be thinking about, if he's really the president of the people did not die, he told several times about this how zelensky would have to feel if he really

worried about the people, do everything so that the ukrainians do not die, do everything so that the old people do not die, so that these children who are not sent to the front they don't know how to do anything, but they are sent, and this is the key but power. that's how they rejected. they reject everything. money earn together talks that made this statement earned the day. how much money arrestovich earned, how much you put the top of the kiev government rotten million while ordinary ukrainians are dying and why their children are in egypt , the president spoke about this. none of their children went to the front, they sit abroad, uh, money. eh, spend and live well. this is the truth of life, and lukashenka is not afraid of this, the reaction of the gap, or he said everything in modern politics memorized phrases. and the words about nothing you look at him, what he says is incomprehensible. and no one knows what he will do tomorrow, but in the meantime, there really is an alternative to the negotiation process in general. so, as you

can see, there is, of course, no alternative, uh, and uh, here's the question. it seems to me that the chinese proposals were discussed a little bit differently. and this also caused a great heated discussion 12 points. and even then the expert community expressed quite definite dissatisfaction. and where are the specific steps what to do? that is, you gave us the concept? and what, what to do with a specific one, here, please, as if alexander grigoryevich suggested specific steps, but this is a request and a willingness to do something. these are things. eh, absolutely different, but the proposals of the belarusian side. e. today, they are already there is. they live on their own ah and ah, the reaction that followed the first she is only the first reaction further it doesn't matter. uh, the belarusian proposals will be considered , because they are the only ones to date that offer concrete steps not to start a long-term process, but to move to another level, stop at this

point and reach another level. and then others will join in, let's listen to the president's fragment of the message, one way negotiations are negotiations without preconditions. and if for once again he tries to use the pause in hostilities somehow was to strengthen their positions, again by deception. it was russia that was obliged to use the full power of the military-industrial complex and the army to prevent the escalation of the conflict. and phosphorus ammunition and combined uranium and uranium enriched in the urals should all go. into action, if once again there is a deception and even the slightest movement across the border to ukraine or from the other side of russia is noticed , the movement of the army, preparation for the attack , military policy, all issues, territorial

restoration security, etc. and possibly resolved at the negotiating table. together we will pay attention to the events that have become a global catalyst for chaos, extremist activity in europe, provocations to interreligious hatred - this is legal, then after that we will look for the cause of what happened and analyze who tends to talk a lot, but do nothing, europe was multicultural and tolerant only in words the stupidity and fear of liberals does not depend on the country and passport. but this is different in the author's project is different. watch new episodes on belarus 24 tv channel. but still

less, here we are talking about ukraine, there is another opponent of peace initiatives. this is poland , the day before, in the palace of independence, at a meeting with the president of belarus, the head of the russian foreign intelligence service, sergei naryshkin , also spoke about this. he said, i quote the leadership of poland is waiting for a good moment to take control of part of the ukrainian territories, so the polish government opposes a peaceful settlement of the conflict yuryevich luna with a bigger expert. a-a agree with the head of the foreign intelligence service of russia so it's not his opinion. this is an invoice. this is a pure fact. if you remember, er, it means that the former head of the polish foreign ministry, sikorsky, said that already in the first days of the start of a special military operation. uh, they had

a plan on the table, so to speak, the annexation of part of the territory of ukraine, of course. uh, they have a certain request. uh, hmm, partly of polish society , which suffers at the time when this part of ukraine was, uh, it means that it is part of the commonwealth, so they do not reject this idea, and they are waiting for the right moment. if ukrainians think that the poles will help them at a critical moment. yes, they will help, well , in a completely different way, based on their national interests, just like now they are helping with weapons. yes, that is, they are financially accountable to the kiev regime, so there should be no illusion here, maybe even in the near future, this year , i don’t know, the timing can be predicted and different, but i’m sure we will see an attempt, the implementation of this plan. well, the polish plan is only possible if ukraine loses if

you start negotiations after the plan is thrown out. i would like to add that the entire sovereignty of ukraine and statehood in this tragedy was largely kept at the expense of the eastern territory of ukraine, which ukraine lost in the fourteenth year as a result of the coup d'état and the outbreak of the civil war, and today the poles. poland polish power must be divided between the people and the government, in fact, they have already occupied western ukraine in any scenario for the end of the war. in any scenario, the influence of poland on the territory of western ukraine is already colossal , we can introduce the so-called peacekeeping continent. it's nothing but an occupation on a plausible pretext, but it's not just the troops, and swimming is the economy. and swimming is a policy swimming is a value today ukraine cannot exist without western assistance. if today, all of a sudden, we present such a picture , the flow of western mail to ukraine ends - this is hunger and death, not counting that. there is nothing. nothing left and the people. no

, they have already parted and started their plan for implementation. this one also touches on our immediate question about this said. here our actions. which in this situation will be worked out together with russia, of course , we will not fight on foreign territory , the president said about this, we do not claim any territories ever in our lives, but to protect our national interests. you understand that if poland occupies the western part of our border threats will increase many times, then there will be an axis -symmetrical response, which the president has been talking about all the time, but they emphasize in their territory, protecting their own. with me a serious opponent we have on in the west of the nearest neighbor has turned into a serious opponent of a potential real enemy of such a thing. you are right, and here, in my opinion, it is also a question of economic policy, primarily due to what poland lived in the previous years before the conflict before the special military operation due to, those

preferences that it received from the european union, they significantly decreased almost ceased, so she relied on militarization. and this is their program at least due to militarization. uh, boost your economic development. that is, due to those injections are primarily american to do. uh, stronger its economy, and the maximum program is the western territory, which is still. ah, the polish establishment. societies are different there and i won’t say, but the percentage of polish is considered one’s own and why the dangerous situation in ukraine about its western part, as soon as peacekeeping intimacy. a dangerous precedent is being set, which is dangerous for our non-our western territories in relation to the territory of western and belarus. that is why we do not have the right to allow this together with russia. this one moment the second moment, people also live there in western ukraine, who are mostly slavs, who, among other things, have

the mentality of the remaining soviet union , which remembers how we lived as a single family. and these are our people too. if it is very simple and primitive to say. uh, that's why we shouldn't forget about them, that's why in no case should we allow the splitting of ukraine under the guise of peacekeeping forces, or some other scheme, we should not allow it. uh, bringing some foreign troops there, because what we see is that the situation in ukraine is developing according to the assyrian scenario. now the west is more and more inclined to this, the series also first unbalanced the state, then they tried to carry out a change of power, and then the american one. they ended up on the territory of syria and in ukraine, too, do not mind repeating and still have not left, and it is not known when you continue to analyze what is happening in ukraine, all these days the traumatic events around the world of the dormition kiev pechersk lavra on march 29 continue. in kyiv was in our process of exile from the lava of the monastics, the faithful stood up to

defend the shrine. this video has already bypassed all the media praying girl on her knees and dancing circle well demons in another way you can call them look. this is also in geopolitics or is it something else is a conscious policy of destruction. this is only the crown, they discredited the orthodox church, starting from the collapse of the ussr, they constantly either ridiculed or said that it was not modern, or something else. why orthodoxy after the collapse of the ussr became the theme that united russia at the beginning and unites the post-soviet space, because there are many orthodox in belarus in ukraine in georgia whatever you take into the country,

this is really the core that unites everyone. it means that the communist party was destroyed and the ideology of communism was cut out at the time. it is necessary to destroy orthodoxy and take away history. this is a process at the same time, you began to throw in your brains. and there have always been enemies. but we did not have such attempts, as they tried to rewrite history for us. how much the president talked about this at the message, they also tried to comb your hair, see it's not a question, we understand that the kiev regime is peculiar to it. is that why there are enough worries now? i am now concretizing that there are enough worries, because this additionally causes a split in society. we see what happens with the mobile process. you write down requests. what are you doing with us, when already metropolitan, lavra paul says that