now there are dozens of joint projects with an emphasis on import substitution and industrial cooperation. a very honest relationship that was established last year by the belarusian metallurgical plant. we began to supply metal products there hand-in-hand into heavy metal-lore products, that is, for tires of tatarstan enterprises, and practically mixed the products that were previously supplied with europe; now russia has a great need and large programs for the use of gas-engine equipment specifically for lng and cng. if we can this big project to do, then our largest customer lord i think his need will be satisfied. belarus is actively working from kamaz, components for the production of trucks are supplied by more than two dozen of our enterprises 11 news continues to follow developments. details. my colleagues already at 3:00 in the afternoon. i say goodbye to you, see you at the first button.

hello, i am authorized to declare, i am its host

nadezhda sas greetings, i will remind you. this is a program for those who want to better understand what is happening in the world and understand how these processes, events, people will be reflected in the life of each of the life of the strange, but the main events of world politics. these are weeks. we will tell you right now in moscow there was a meeting of the supreme state council of the union state alexander lukashenko and vladimir putin discussed a number of issues. including the progress in the implementation of allied programs and the implementation of the provisions of the agreement on the creation of a union state, as the belarusian leader noted, all 28 allied programs have been implemented by almost 80%. continues to increase and trade turnover over the past year increased by 12% compared to 2021 to a record $45 billion to replace western attempts

at an economic blockade to enter military blackmail economic blockade could not succeed. it’s just that they are how much we decided to knit us, if they thought. seriously, they wouldn’t have done it, because the economy, in principle, is self-sufficient, it didn’t work economically, they began to purposefully finish off military relations. rhetoric intensifies the prospect of a global armed conflict in the spotlight, alexander lukashenko and vladimir putin's security union state, the countries will continue to build up cooperation in the defense sphere. a decision was made to develop a security concept for the union state. this document intends to formulate the fundamental tasks of our interaction in the area of ​​growing tension on the external borders of our states and sanctions and information wars have been unleashed against us. finland has completed the process of joining nato , as a result, the alliance's border with russia has doubled

since 1947. helsinki consecutively pursued a policy of neutrality, earning on intermediary trade, it was not by chance that the system of agreements that fixed the post-war borders in europe was signed in 1975 between nato countries and the states of the eastern bloc, namely helsinki, but under the influence of the conflict in ukraine, the finnish elites decided to break all ties with russia and join hostile to her badly in moscow have already promised an adequate military-technical response to the actions of a neighbor. us democratic party-affiliated law enforcement moved in an open attack on donald trump last monday in new york, the former president was indicted on 34 counts. at the same time, according to polls, three -quarters of americans consider trump's persecution to be politically motivated, the manhattan prosecutor's office accused politicians of forging documents in connection with the payment of money to a porn star for not disclosing information about their sexual relationship. clearly what is

the pretext for claims against biden's most rated opponent? everyone found it ridiculous trump himself is doing everything to use the attacks prosecutors to strengthen his election campaign the us presidential election will be held in november made it clear that his country's merger. with poland, there may be a new reality between our peoples in the future, there will be no political, economic or historical borders, zelensky said, while he almost verbatim repeated the words uttered in may last year by the polish leader andrzej dududa, who recently visited minsk, the head of the service. russian foreign intelligence service sergey naryshkin bluntly said that, according to available data, the polish leadership preparing for the incorporation of western ukrainian lands the composition of his state after the military defeat of kiev the legendary chinese military strategist sun tzu in his treatise wrote the rules of warfare is not to rely on the fact that the enemy will not come, but

to rely on the how can i meet him not rely on the fact that he will not attack, but rely on the fact that i will make an attack on myself impossible, for him and indeed it was formulated back in the 4th century bc, but how accurately reflects the current moment about how belarus is preparing for the fact that the enemy may come and what role tactical nuclear weapons will play in preventing an attack and will be discussed in today's program. i am glad to welcome vadim borovik, a political scientist, who is already present in our studio. hello. good afternoon, i'm alexander mikhailov, head of the bureau of military-political analysis. hello, by tradition, we start our program with a blitz question. do you want peace prepare for war? this is again the number one rule for owners, or else you think, otherwise vadim please, in general, if your adversary knows what, if any unfriendly or aggressive action will follow from his side.

and you can inflict unacceptable damage on him, then, naturally, as a rule, he refrains from using any weapons, your address or an act of aggression, and we know that no acts of aggression have been committed against countries that possess nuclear weapons, therefore, a preventive measure , a good tactical correct nuclear weapon is a deterrent weapon and in history the possession of a nuclear weapons and the use of nuclear weapons. if only one e, a fact, or rather, two facts of use against military purposes. this is the bombing of hiroshiki nagasaki by american troops. therefore, not a single nuclear power has yet been attacked and nuclear weapons have not been used for offensive purposes over the past almost 80 years, this has not happened, therefore, indeed. in the presence of nuclear weapons, you can not be afraid for tomorrow, and indeed for the republic of belarus there was a key decision that will be made in the next few days, months, and in fact

, alexander most of the message to the belarusian people, and alexander lukashenko devoted precisely to this. it was key because security, especially now in the current realities of the world. the division is taking place and any state understands with whom it is in alliance and against whom it is fighting, it is forced to protect itself, and the key, again, was said that we are defending ourselves. what do you think? what reactions, in your opinion, are the most key among western states; i note that the message of alexander grigoryevich to the people, well, the parliament of belarus and the people of belarus were looked at in russia very seriously and thoughtfully. moreover, now e russia of the republic of belarus is connected by new nuclear relations. this is a very big responsibility of the two leaders of our countries, and indeed, the news that tactical nuclear weapons will be deployed on the territory

of belarus in general caused a very big stir in the west. based on the political analysis bureau, we monitor western networks, western statements and reactions of the local electorate to statements from their politicians. there was a very big and serious question from the inhabitants of europe to their politicians. what are we to do now with all this, what you have brought international relations to, which, in fact, is neutral, independent of almost all geopolitical centers of power in the eurasian space, belarus is becoming a military player, that is, a military-political player, and in the geopolitical plane in which we are now, and the first of july, which was designated by putin lukashenko as the date for the placement of tactical nuclear supplies on territory of the republic of belarus this is already such a reminder by the euroleader that you either leave the ukrainian case before july 1 and stop following instructions from washington or move to a new plane of relations with

russia not so long ago this decision and of course about the opinions, yes , spineless europe of course, you can talk endlessly, but let's hear the voice of mr. borel and his reaction, the deployment of russian nuclear weapons in belarus will equip an irresponsible escalation and a threat to european security. and brussels is leading new sanctions against minsk, if the belarusian authorities do not stop what is happening, there is no need to scare me. i'm already scared. i already saw. eh, very much in this world. many ah, here they will deploy nuclear weapons in belarus, we are imposing sanctions against you. you've gone crazy here. did you forget that you already introduced them yesterday alexander lukashenko e.

vadim, you yourself were present at the time of the message and addressed your question to the president, but what does the reaction say first of all. here the same borel in the whole european union understands that the jokes are already over and in fact the degree is so high. well, firstly, i want to support my colleague, everything is correctly said the only moment. we have never been on the sidelines. and where are some political processes, we were at the very edge of the geopolitical divide and have always been involved in all geopolitical processes and are doing everything to ensure that our people and our country do not lose sovereignty and peace. since there are a lot of interested parties in destabilizing the situation in belarus and it is for this that we are strengthening the joint grouping of troops, we are strengthening the technical , we are conducting appropriate training of military personnel and e. listen when we

talk about the return of tactical nuclear weapons to the territory of belarus. first, we are doing this strictly within the framework of international law, despite the fact that our partners under the budapest agreement have violated their obligations. i mean washington london they should have abstained throughout our sovereign history. economic pressure from intervention in our internal political affairs, on the contrary, they constantly did this, so they violated their agreements, and we are returning what we had on our territory and for now we are returning only tactical weapons. thank you very much indeed, moscow and minsk agreed to place russian nuclear weapons on the territory of belarus step, bright after all, the mid- 1990s, domestic ammunition. they were located only in their field, and russian diplomacy criticized the americans, who continued to store charges in europe, urging them to take rockets home, and fate is our nose at the extremely important

decision of moscow and minsk in more detail in our story on march 25th. vladimir putin announced the imminent deployment of tactical nuclear weapons in belarus, while moscow and minsk agreed to do this without violating international obligations on the nonproliferation of nuclear weapons. on the 3rd of april we start training the crew. and on july 1 we are finishing the construction of a special storage facility for tactical nuclear weapons on the territory of belarus, we have already helped our belarusian colleagues to re-equip them aircraft aircraft of the belarusian air force 10 aircraft are ready for the use of this type of the first, we have already transferred in belarus to our well-known very effective complex from counter

, according to the russian ambassador to belarus, tactical nuclear weapons will be deployed near the border. with poland, in this way, the allied state will increase the possibility of ensuring its security. part of the belarusian ground attack aircraft gained the ability to strike at enemy targets as a result of a defeat in a nuclear isto. in addition, the rye forces of belarus were transferred operational-tactical missile system iskander-m it can use missiles, both in conventional and nuclear versions, the reaction of the west followed immediately, for example, french president emmanuel macron during his visit to china said that no country can deploy nuclear weapons on the territory of another country, in response, alexander lukashenko made a radical proposal. if they agree, then it is necessary to withdraw all nuclear weapons to americans from five or six countries where they are stationed, period, but i

in general, in this regard, a radical. i believe that nuclear weapons should be brought together in one heap in one heap to destroy them within uh, literally some time. that's all, and chatting, like, like this our comrade knows how to do, well, all specialists. therefore , well, let's put everything together and destroy it. this is the best option. in the meantime , we do it the way we do it. they are russian tactical nuclear weapons in belarus - this is a defensive reaction to the current geopolitical situation and a response to the uk's statement about the supply of ukraine munitions with combined uranium , such weapons are considered dangerous due to radiation dust, which will inevitably lead to contamination of crop areas and create a danger to both local residents and the environment. in addition, many experts note the double standards of the collective west, because the decision to deploy tactical

nuclear weapons outside their country is well known to the united states america has been pursuing such a policy together with european countries for decades. why do americans place on their territory teach, by the way, saying their crew of their pilots. uh, they use weapons if necessary. we agreed that we did. alexander lukashenko spoke about the intensification of negotiations on the return of nuclear weapons to our country during his message to the people and the national assembly, the president recalled that back in the nineties, when belarus was withdrawing soviet nuclear weapons from its territory, the west received dalma guarantees in the field of security, and then he himself and trampled on their prevailing circumstances and the military-political situation around our

countries were optimized by me strongly negotiations with the president of russia putin on the return of nuclear weapons to belarus specifically on the return of nuclear weapons, which were withdrawn in the nineties and tactical nuclear weapons, the matter may not be limited, - said the belarusian leader, if necessary, strategic weapons will be deployed in belarus a week ago, an order to the military to immediately immediately restore the sites where nuclear warheads were placed and i must say it will be necessary. we putin and we will introduce here, if necessary , strategic weapons, and they must understand this. bastards, i am not trying to intimidate or blackmail anyone, who once i talk about this. i want to secure the belarusian state and provide for the belarusian people. i want to note that in the plot it is quite clearly traced, the cause-and-effect relationship of this decision draws attention to this. now we will not only talk about this with a hotel demo, a military analyst with former

high-ranking officials of the ministry of defense, hungary bear mkm in the program here is my frost question. the issue is the deployment of nuclear weapons on the territory of the allied countries. could this be the reason for washington's reserved reaction to the decision to deploy russian tactical nuclear weapons in belarus then why are some european states so concerned about this? now us policy has begun

an unprecedented military buildup in modern history. naturally, belarus perceives this as a strategic threat, given the difference in territory and population between these strange ones. are not by deploying nuclear weapons. i'm not sure there's some kind of threat here. belarus regarding the build-up of the country of poland in 2014 . i think it's

natural back to russia. i understand that some countries see the situation, unfortunately. this still contributes to the escalation for your answers, but in fact, vadim and what do you think, how fair it is to say that russia is escalating the conflict in politics , the word is fair, there is always the concept of expediently beneficial and doing. who those who can afford to take certain actions in response without receiving, so to speak, an asymmetric reaction. look , when they even agreed on the caribbean crisis. we removed weapons from cuba. they had to take off the fight heads in turkey by the next they put them in their place. yes, that is, they performed further. we uh, why

were us tactical weapons in europe at all since the warsaw pact was vastly outnumbered and they considered tactical weapons. let's let's pay attention to the map of the deployment of tactical nuclear weapons in europe to the united states of america, please . that's what they were interested in, so that these tactical nuclear weapons make it possible to more effectively resolve some issues on the battlefield. it is necessary to remove the airfield with one charge enough and, accordingly, that was such an option. ah, confrontation. but then we disbanded the warsaw pact organization. in principle, we were negotiating in the vein that russia and nato would cooperate and interact nato and took over commitments, they say didn't sign, but took notice that they won't expand, though. we constantly see the expansion of nato and, uh, it is approaching our borders, especially we see it in the baltic states and in poland, poland has generally been turned into a striking fist, potentially posing

a threat to the allied state, therefore naturally, given the fact that on the eve of even this, putin and russia have their own the federation has officially addressed the offer. the proposal was not just on, it means not hear it was vysmino in the media of western countries. it was evident that it was being carried out by the united states, an operation thought out, read for escalation. the most important idea is the deployment of tactical nuclear weapons on the territory of belarus - this is a step where we want to force washington to dialogue. and here is what he said, the polish deputy marek sawicki let's hear, it's time to place nuclear weapons on the territory of poland, so that it also deters putin, we don't need to use them at all, but it's worth having them, it won't hurt to be in a state of readiness , it is necessary to say and that we will not give our consent, neither to division nor to blackmail. yes, no matter how much germany

is now offended by the united states of america, the alliance is the key militant violin today - this is certainly. poland how to respond to such statements alexander firstly, the reaction has already been heard in the actions of our leaders, the leaders of russia, the republic of belarus and i are on the field about the escalation. i will simply bring to this thought that until the thirteenth year we watched how nato was expanding, and in the zero years the process went simply at an irreversible speed and the baltic states and hungary, and so on and other countries, that is, no one reacted to our statements , they said they laughed and mocked at one. well, the year is 113, when russia directly indicated to washington that they were placing mk 41 exhibitions on the territory of eastern europe , which could in no way be used by installations for using anti-aircraft guided missiles. but as an offensive weapon. they can fire tomahawks. with

medium-range missiles and putin directly spoke about this to washington, they continued to laugh, that is, they already placed launchers along our border and continued to laugh. this is after they expanded nato to the east. after they created infrastructures for nuclear weapons in six states of europe, and let me remind you also greece, where they have been preserved for nuclear weapons for thio, and ammunition can also be placed there if necessary. again, according to our data, such an infrastructure. the secret is being created in the baltic states on the territory of poland , the engineering troops are already working, and one signal from washington is enough to move more ammo there. excuse me when a year before the start of the special military operation in the spring of 21. washington began to officially supply ukraine with lethal weapons, ufo javelins, and so on. armor equipment lethal weapons. opened a year before the special operation. this is who really reproaches

that we are something. they were engaged in escalation and when ammunition began to be delivered to the belgorod bryansk kursk voronezh rostov region across the territory of the russian federation starting from november december of the twenty-first year the region in the crimea of ​​the russian federation, what was left to do in russia was to watch how heavy artillery was already hitting our people over, by the way, nato production, that is , to stand and continue to look at all this, this is what the reaction should be. putin what reaction should lukashenka have when it is said around his borders, primarily western , weapons are concentrated, heavy weapons polish special forces special forces, in fact, nato are deployed additional ones no longer on a rotational basis, but us military personnel are transferred on a permanent basis, that is american units with a division of the airborne forces flew here. well, excuse me, i need to do something, and those actions that our leaders are doing. they are absolutely adequate to this situation, on the contrary, even here i am listening to the expert community. outraged,

more gestures are needed. you understand that the path of service is a little bit, they are still soft politicians. it could have been even tougher, as washington likes to do. but you know, our leaders still respect international law. that's right , vadim says, we do everything within the framework of international law, because our actions today will be judged by children and grandchildren in the future. and now the historians of the future will judge this conflict in our favor, they are in favor of the collective west, i also want to note the american president john f. kennedy compared nuclear weapons with a house-swinging sword hanging over our heads on the thinnest thread and the presence of nuclear weapons. one of the sides deters the other from the use of nuclear weapons by the first, but for this the first side must be sure that the enemy has nuclear weapons in technical capacity, as well as political and psychological readiness of this enemy. to use nuclear weapons in retaliation is the unacceptability of the consequences of such.

potential retaliatory nuclear strike for the state and society, and nuclear deterrence is detailed in our reference . the theory of nuclear deterrence assumes that any country that owns nuclear weapons will not use them as the first of fears of a retaliatory nuclear strike. however, nuclear deterrence can also be directed against a non-nuclear adversary, and then a state's nuclear weapons are interpreted as a unilateral emergency means of countering an attack that is superior to conventional military forces or countering the use of chemical or biological weapons in a situation critical for the survival of a state, the classic example of nuclear deterrence is the caribbean crisis of 1962, when the united states resorted to threats to use nuclear weapons, demanding the withdrawal of soviet nuclear missiles, but refrained from such use due to fear of retaliation. at the same time, the ussr had about 17 times less nuclear missiles at the time of the crisis.

arsenal than the united states. however, even this ratio was enough to trigger the psychology of nuclear deterrence . and in fact , does the theory of nuclear deterrence work today like never before? vadim , of course, it works, but listen here, the united states will act a little more cunningly. and we must understand this, they are still interested in dragging out this conflict. the economic weakening of the russian federation is still at the ready. once again i want to say that there are some hotbeds of fire along the perimeter of russia, we see an attempt in georgia this will continue, afghanistan is on pause, the north caucasus and so on are not without reason. for example, they invite armenia to the democratic summit in azerbaijan, that is, they constantly split the stones of the contradiction, their task is not to have a person in the kremlin who could order the use of any type of weapons and the task of destabilizing the internal economically serious lesson. those of our actions that we

are taking to move to belarus means tactical nuclear weapons are absolutely correct actions necessary and this is a good preventive measure. but here's what my colleague said. we are very responsible and careful in this matter. we must think to be responsible, but at the same time we need it. this means a strategic initiative , and i asked the head of state that we should try to demonstrate a threat not to nato in europe, but on the territory of the united states of america, and electrical pressure plays a very important role for them. and now, if they again felt somewhere in latin america and placed in their own e, russia's tactical nuclear capability is, perhaps, that's the pressure that the electrical masses would put on washington to influence their decision. that is, maybe some other asymmetric actions, not necessarily this option. but today we are with you what we are doing today, we are fulfilling washington’s scenarios, i’ve already said this, for more than a year i that it was not necessary to get involved in this special military

provocation by the united states at all because they got involved according to the scenario in washington or it was necessary to do so, that is, option one or do so in order for it to be a jewelry-quality war, it can only be effective quickly, and if it didn’t get it, then it’s a mistake. there is no time , so today we need to break their script to their advantage. i say it again when the ministry of defense announces. e russian federation or vsu statistics on losses in washington applauds both sides. well done , mutual destruction of industry , mutual destruction of manpower and equipment. you would do this according to the scenario of washington, today we need to demonstrate to two countries washington and london. this is the one firm that runs europe today that there is an existential threat to them too. how to do it? we have to think, but a solution is being worked out, but for now we are with you and we are executing their scenario. nothing good will happen. alexander, but again, we are talking about the reaction of washington . can the us decision be adopted and rescheduled? nuclear tactical charges from the bases that

are now in the same netherlands and belgium are already in poland and lithuania as a mirror , again, the next actions, or still a degree. uh, the voltage will be reduced. as you think, you know, uh, in general, the statement about the movement of tactical military weapons on the territory of belarus, first of all, has a sobering effect on the western elites. and we draw such and such conclusions based on an analysis of the public reaction to the statement in russia and belarus and the response to the reactions in the statements of western politicians. they are confused. they are confused. their cards are mixed up. they did not predict such a move on the part of our coalition, one must understand that against the collective west the coalition of russia with its allies has entered into a very serious confrontation. perhaps stretched out for many years and it is right that we return in memory. in the second year after the caribbean crisis, in which

our country won, it was we who forced them to withdraw weapons from our continent. and it was precisely after the parisian prince that the soviet union lived quietly for 30 years, not being afraid of any military attacks . yes, whoever on the planet, er, would dare to fish. sorry to the soviet union after the caribbean crisis, when the americans wiped themselves and removed their missiles and nuclear weapons. that is correct in our discourse, probably, there is a need, a demonstration, first of all , of our military-technical capabilities. moreover , putin recently mentioned this. we have a nuclear test site on novaya zemlya where the tsar bomb of 58 megatons and a number of other nuclear weapons were once detonated. again, we are no longer deterred in the treaty of the day, as we can be deterred, when the americans place their nuclear weapons with their military and political allies through nato but how does the union state of russia belarus differ from co?

the necessary connections within nato yes, nothing in fact, this is the same collective will to use the existing weapons and correctly tells lukashenko that strategic weapons, so far, no one touches, and they are just more afraid of in the united states because it is strategic weapons we will strike at america if, of course, she dares to start a nuclear war with our allied state. let's not even talk about it. i hope it's hello this is more no hello us euro leaders. and by the way , we can expect that the eu neighbors, in the light of new realities, will help to ensure that the same hotheads in poland and other baltic countries, the basis, excitedly nuances. you know how calm washington is now. that's when they talked about some kind of nuclear capabilities of russia in the black region of the black sea. they immediately began to threaten and say that there would be unacceptable damage to the russian federation now they are calmly canceling the biden today. he says that today we are at

the peak of economic development. we have everything wonderful and they say americans are not nervous, as long as they say, so today we do not succumb to the provocation of the russian federation in this game. we don't play. we see that brussels is more worried. it's nearby. yes, they began to pull the blanket over themselves again with this card. they have already trampled germany in europe, now they generally want to completely disengage it, so to speak. well , germany came under the control of washington and of course, in this situation, there should be a very responsible policy. but once again i want on all starting points these moods could not be taken away from the day before. here is this ssu. it's a shame on this propaganda, which convinced everyone that everything is simple, now i want us to take a cold shower already, we thought, very pragmatically, very thought out. it must be understood that the chinese position will be very restrained, balanced and deliberate. do you think, please tell me, yes, the decision to deploy

tactical nuclear weapons could be discussed with the same mr. sidefin , could agree, but listen to the correct saigolch answers my question in one. you asked a question that we cannot fully answer, taking into account all the nuances and international obligations. therefore, in this case it will not be absolutely correct, but you understand, trade between china and russia is 3%. all us 12 with europe over 30. let's trade comparison. you cannot get down. here is some kind of medicine. you cannot immediately replace it, whether you understand it or not, taking into account all trade and economic relations, nothing is done quickly. therefore, the russian federation today must very clearly understand that a very large cargo responsibility on the russian federation and in relation to belarus she behaves very decently. after all, russia took on all the costs of this military operation. this is very decent behavior. and including often the presence in our russian market largely compensates for our losses in western markets, but in this situation. we must understand everything. it may not develop for us according to such

a favorable scenario, and i will even tell you more that a small tactical battle with tactical nuclear weapons in europe, the united states will arrange a huge vadim, let's talk about this in more detail, we will tell our respected viewer. what is the difference between tactical and strategic? i remind you that on the air the sas program is authorized to declare we are talking about tactical nuclear weapons, and not only the belarusian military was given the iskander-m missile system capable of using nuclear missiles , minister raven shoigu said on april 3 at a training ground in russia, which means training belarusian calculations of the complex, as he noted and by the way, alexander appeals to you, our respected audience, to explain enough, it is clear what is the difference between tactical nuclear weapons and strategic tactical nuclear weapons, they are small

power, well, of course, in comparison with strategic nuclear weapons. and we can give an example, let's say the power of nuclear weapons, and based on, let's say from the explosion of a nuclear bomb all over russia this was about 15 kilotons wasted by violet tape. and let's say. you see, with the recent explosion in your beret. that picture was very famous all over the world and observed about 2 kilotons, wasting the equivalent of power. this explosion of saltpeter made up, that is. here, look. we will now turn our attention to our schedule. this is how an umbrella defeats 100 ct ammunition, yes, that is, to understand an average of up to 30-40 ct, ammunition is called a tactical poison weapon, usually in a larger, more powerful ammunition, it already belongs to the category of strategic ammunition, because the use of such ammunition is already causing damage, and that the side that is used on the battlefield, so the damaging factors should not go in. they gave 15-20 km there, because

tactically i found it can be used and heavy artillery, not only aviation and not only missiles to deliver ammunition, therefore 2-3 kilotons and here is the power of artillery tactical nuclear ammunition aviation ammunition and rocket ammunition have serious power pay attention to the iskander m complex - this is a unique weapon the missile flies at high altitude maneuver practically no, it’s not reflected on enemy radars; it accelerates on the march to 6-7 mach numbers, that is , it overcomes the hypersonic barrier, which starts at about six mach numbers and essence. uh, this complex, firstly, as an operational-tactical complex , that is, up to 500 km, hits everything and everything, again , first of all, it hits air defense systems and counter -battery equipment , enemy radar equipment, that is, large powerful and technically equipped, essentially military bases that take place on

the territory of eastern europe and, of course, the europeans who encountered a scanner back in the kaliningrad region, when russia first placed it there in our enclave, yes , which is surrounded, in fact. uh, nato back then there was a lot of hype when the euro calculated the affected area, it turned out that it reaches the borders of france, spain, italy, in addition to this semicircle, now, when tactical nuclear weapons will be deployed in belarus and can be used both by missiles and by means of military aviation. moreover, modern russian-made combat aircraft are in service with the belarusian air force, and for europe this is such a double shower. you understand contrast first, kaliningrad now, belarus and what's next? a, if strikes are launched from two territories of kaliningrad and belarus , then almost the entire european territory will be shot through, and then no america will help them, because there is still no air defense system or

air defense system of such a level to shoot down a rocket. once again i will emphasize the importance of the difference between tactical nuclear weapons and strategic ones, because even among experts i have met the opinion that missiles are flying almost to the united states, but it is important to note that we are not talking about intercontinental missiles yet. but this is still in belarus. yes, such moments, firstly, now all experts agree that the concepts of tactical and strategic weapons are being blurred in many respects. and here even more emphasis is placed. as you rightly said at a distance and on the e-e application of the objectives of the application. that's right, a colleague said that, as a rule, tactical nuclear weapons are used on the battlefield in such a way as to minimize losses for their own armed forces, so the charge is smaller and cause maximum damage. to avoid using confidential weapons. yes, that is, in order for you to smash some settlement, you need hundreds of missiles

, large accumulations of military equipment and forces, and you can destroy this object by using one charge or two, but you understand, tactical nuclear weapons if they are used on a settlement , as a strategic nuclear weapon in the city there are already and the charges can be even more than twenty kilotons, respectively, it will be a huge destructive force, which will be comparable, but, of course, e is not so powerful with the use and strategy of the surface. could be more detailed say directly to ours. actually accommodation in europe on the border. so let's say, in addition to kaliningrad and e on the border of e, with e, the european union and the nato bloc , tactical weapons pose a direct threat. to these named capitals, and today they understand that even aggression against an address will be a response to a blow that will cause unacceptable damage to these states. this is a serious preventive measure. once again i emphasize tactical nuclear weapons - these are

small nuclear charges along with delivery vehicles intended for use on battlefield or for delivering a limited nuclear strike. they serve to destroy targets in a certain area without large-scale radioactive contamination and tactical nuclear weapons. never been used in a real military conflict eh weapons and in addition, not one nuclear power. until now , they did not want to risk starting a nuclear war after the use of tactical nuclear weapons. and that's what is important in 1952 in the usa they tested an artillery atomic charge with a capacity of 15 tons, and this began the history of tactical nuclear artillery, we can to look at the screens there to see how it all looks, but, frankly, it's intimidating, despite the fact that the power there is different. yes, alexander please tell me if we talk about future plans

, what further development of relations between russia and the republic can be within the framework of the union state, belarus probably we need to say a few more words about the development of start-3, because now it turns out that belarus is also connected with the russian federation in some way the terms of this contract situation. there's quite complex, because we're already at the beginning pandemics we do not have mutual relations with the americans; they send mutual missions to control deployed nuclear weapons at strategic facilities. and in fact. for these three years of not observing each other , we have, uh, a complete distrust, a complete misunderstanding. what to do next, because russia is ready for the monitoring commissions to send their missions and receive the americans. the americans, in turn, delayed the answer for a very long time. as a result, russia responded to putin's message , which was heard before alexander grigoryevich to our e federal assembly.

belarus does not yet plan to suspend russia's membership in sne-3 and does not deploy strategic nuclear weapons on its territory. we have to understand that student nuclear weapons is a triad, it's not just, uh, intercontinental ballistic missiles. this is just rather the type of strategic weapon that is gradually becoming a thing of the past. here is already a kind of archaism. because there is a nuclear submarine fleet and constantly cruising the international waters of our nuclear submarine, which carry on own nuclear warheads. they are precisely the most dangerous for the american continent, because we can carry blows from both the east and west coasts. again, our analysts read at the end of the soviet era that in order to destroy 80% of the industrial potential of the united states and almost 100% of the social capital of the united states , about 100 ammunition of approximately 800 ct of tnt to violetta is enough for us. that is, in principle, two or three nuclear submarines with with a full

sideload, maces with separating warheads and there are no us americans they are well aware that against these weapons, their air defense systems will not work, and about american air defense in general. this is still for the countries of the second and third world. this is not against russia , and even more so not against china already, because i remind you that since last year, china has become a hypersonic power and put into service two hypnosonic products. what the americans still cannot do, what russia did 6 years ago and 5 years ago, officially, by putting hypersonic weapons into service. and here such a rubicon arises. when the americans reach putting into service their own hypersonic carriers. that's when and this is the year 24-25 by our approximate calculations. that's when the age of a completely different usa will come, firstly, they will try to dominate even more. second, it starts. in my opinion, the military conflict with china is after that. moments they pull they pull this story with china

because so far they do not have hypersound in the field of battles in the sea. china , of course, will sink their augs very simply, and they will have nothing to intercept its giprosonic missiles, the americans will create their own hypersound and begin a very serious escalation in the asia-pacific region. this, by the way, in a sense, did become america's exit point from the ukrainian case, because they will not be able to conduct two companies of an offensive nature on different fronts. but for china, the same chep time is coming because china is now very closely watching the conflict on in ukraine, he very carefully studies the breath of american weapons, in general he did a lot for himself, because they will fight with these weapons in 2-3 years. well, by the way, alexander, tell me, here we're talking about certain international treaties that grunted about forgetting the treaty, they're nuclear proliferation . but he was right when he said it was a nuclear weapon. returns to where it already is. there was something we cannot say about the actions

of the united states of america even earlier, that is, we understand that now, of course, borders are being redrawn. naturally, the hegemon loses its status, but besides this , some kind of international legal norm, in general, some kind of specific scheme for the further work of the world community will have to line up all existing international legal norms. unfortunately, humanity lined up after the bloody meat grinder. the first world war were forced, then to negotiate. yes, the second world war is already the un and, again , they were forced to negotiate. and those were the exceptions. you see, you understand the world was divided. and i have said more than once the world was divided and the ussr and the usa acted in the paradigm of the winners , the winner gets everything, you understand, and one block tilted one part of the world, the other the other someone says that he tilted more fairly, but that bloc won - this is a fact and

the united states today, as a winner, believes that as a winner all laurels are for the winner. you understand what the paradigm of their thinking is today, and now they had a chance, as a winner, to build a more equitable system of international relations, perhaps retaining economic control to some extent, but providing an opportunity for other subjects. eh, feel comfortable. today we understand that a number of countries in the world today are satellites of the united states of america, well, they are not even happy with the role of precious partners. even in the eu, they obeyed them a little, understand, what is south korea, even japan, also in many respects in the military-political economic terms, primarily dependent states of the united states, and today the question has become, what are states like the russian federation? the action restored its economy , military power, political elite changed its perception in the world. remember kozyrev who came to the united states and asked what russian foreign policy to bring or yeltsin who, uh, applauded washington for , uh, correct instructions in building

russian democracy. no, putin came, another political elite, and they perceive international cars in no other way. right there, china from the beginning at the beginning of the 2000s has a completely different relationship. could be fast and meetings it differently oh this is the second economy of the world, which is completely different, in general the philosophy is not 5.000 years consider themselves under heaven. and other countries are in a slightly different status. do not forget about this and one moment. that's what russia should be ready for, and it is necessary to understand the situation very carefully . the americans know how to negotiate, outside. remember the agreements with saudi arabia at one time and it’s not a fact that in the x-hour they may not agree in asia, this moment, which can put on the map the question of simply dividing russia in their interests, because the most important contradiction, while you are afraid of to say this until it is profitable for you, but in the fourteenth year i said that the counterbalance to germany would be more strengthened and everyone smiled on tv here. poland, the main player in europe in military terms, was in the championship today, the president says this in

a message. and now you have the most important contradiction in russia, overpopulated china is economically powerful, which has the potential and russia beyond the urals 14 million. regions are often not equipped in society. know in one to fight the enemies that but they are. tomorrow they are today, today you need to understand that the situation is very serious. and the russian federation should emerge from this conflict so strong that she was a worthy partner of china not weakened, but strong, because any strong ground. yes, not only alexander lukashenko spoke during the message. i think you have noted key words that were addressed not to the belarusian people, but to the ukrainian people and their leadership, my friends. sit down at the negotiating table, because if the russian military-industrial complex starts its work at full capacity. here, then no one will

talk about anything. chips will fly, and i think, alexander, you will agree with me. i uh i’ll just add that the special operation was forced by the measure, and we couldn’t do anything. i’ll already explain why we could continue to sit and watch how they continue to stuff these ukraine into it with ammunition. to your heavy artillery, which is already starting to shoot at the russian regions, imagine if shells would fly from the border to belarus of the regions of ukraine your villages your villages your cities, as we had in belgorod in kursk in bryansk in lukashenka would not have carried out i'm more than sure to start a dubious company after the very scandalous campaign of the twentieth year in belarus, which was also observed with russia and was very worried about the status of the president of belarus, whether he would withstand this pressure, we observed with pressure from europe how they hit belarus and so on, how they pumped their money , and i remember very well the twelfth year in russia because i would imagine a rally on poklonnaya gora, which

was anti-bog about statehood and i was in the thick of all these events 11 years ago and exactly how much money we had then for a revolution that did not take place. i won’t voice this makfu now , he knows all this money, all this money passed through him, and our position. they were walking that's when the bandits in the twelfth year. du only failed to pull off what he managed to pull off in kiev and failed to pull off, then in minsk a very similar story. i want to say that if the special operation had not been started, if we continue to observe all this disgrace that has been going on in ukraine since the nineteenth year, because, to be honest, we hoped that zelensky would be more adequate than poroshenko, he himself is from krivoy rog, he speaks russian in eastern ukraine. by the way, he speaks ukrainian worse than russian. but what did we get in return for a controlled puppet. this is the theme of our next program. the only moment. i

generally agree with you. you are right in everything , the only moment when we say we were forced. we have already lost, you know, we were taken out, we made the winners will be judged, yes, yes. stroke, i am on the side of the russian federation, they forced us. this is bad second 500,000 injured on both sides dead and killed. why is alexander lukashenko's position to sit down at the negotiating table, because now ukraine has received the latest weapons , the accumulation of military force, russia, as they say , will launch to its fullest. how many millions? we will also suppose, and what is the motivation of the majority of the citizens of the russian federation of ukraine ? you know the fighters on tv. we have a lot on tv. especially those who even military departments did not pass, but you of any officer who passed the army, at least, did not even fight. ask and i remember, i had a military department, colonel. he says, listen, here you are arguing, swearing, and i carried the children of your age

in my arms at school, you understand, why did the president of belarus say that enormous damage is being done to the infrastructure of the economy? russian federation and belarus why greetings the president of belarus that you need to sit down at the negotiating table, they will start a question. how many bones under these, e the negotiating table will be at this point. thank you very much, dear guests for our discussion , and we couldn’t help but talk about sore points to complete our program, of course, i would like an expression of confidence that deterrence will fully work even before the actual use of nuclear weapons. it will never happen that those who in the western capitals are too carried away by life in the moment will think about the eternal and, of course, i will not leave you without philosophical quote this time again from the work of my beloved viktor pelevin

why life became so cheap , dostoevsky thought yes, because 20,000 people died earlier in battle cheaply and it was remembered for centuries. because each of these 20,000 had to be personally slaughtered by someone to release the guts, the huge army of demons living in the human mind was saturated with one battle without flinching. and now, to kill 20,000, it is enough to press the button for a demonic feast, so little thanks. well and now authorized to declare. threats to the security of belarus from the west forced minsk to resort to nuclear deterrence

is there the most promising position to defeat the enemy? or this company of belarus of russia was developed and supervised by just the same specialists not only of the country, if you call yourself independent, then show your independence , show and prove faith in what you do on the channel belarus 24. they are ready to go to the end, the attacking star is our participants made a wish to win, but their tower fell the tower also made a wish, what should

i think about? let's think about it, well done, where are these buildings from? tell mash right without sarcasm. somewhere around here they are. they just put me there. there, which lady has a magic ball. we know for sure that baba yaga has a magic ball , of course, your team is not enough super, and for the sake of victory they will stop at nothing, who is the coach of the belarus national football team, because watch the tower intellectual entertainment project on our tv channel.

and the prospects for high achievements from the modern challenges of our time fundamental conversation once again highlights the economy today is the number one issue. so many factors influence its development, and it is important to be in good shape to make well-considered decisions . political efforts bring, well, or will bring economic dividends in the near future. it is always pleasant to talk about new projects, ideas to talk about cooperation, but, unfortunately, it surrounds our country not only created it, but it turns out that some people are weird, they pay for others, we keep in mind our economic interests, but if

we participate globally in the formation of space. or if you want a new world pole with equal cooperation and a self-sufficient market, the main broadcast project. watch on belarus 24 tv channel.