almost 500 hectares of new green spaces will appear in the region, planting material will provide pets of speed and carelessness of the main cause of serious accidents. kai, already at the beginning of the motorcycle season, also fixes accidents involving bikers, traffic police officers carry out enhanced service on the roads of the capital as a motorcyclist, special attention during raids , inspectors check the availability of documents , inspect the vehicle, and also recommends bikers to remember the rules after the winter break and take a few lessons at the training ground . let's spend the morning at company of experts and professionals in the sport of all physical exercise. they discipline. today you and i will cook enough. unusual breakfast, it will be so in asian style. it will be spring rolls with a sea cocktail, which people still don’t get enough. it’s quite possible to compensate for yourself with some kind of seafood. and

it will be very cool. let's tell. how to choose the right products. choose bright orange carrots, the brighter it is, the more quarantine will linger in it , see the breakfast of champions program on our tv channel. i roman the book in my hands. throated aside after aside , choking with a skin word zus, their manifestation of a man, creativity is the most wondrous and worthy of respect, this book in books live dunks, minura. reporting expressively improve people's voices.

hello, on the air, the program of the father with the authority to declare i am its host nadezhda sas greetings to you. i remember. this is a program for those who want to better understand what is happening in the world and understand what politics this week we will tell you right now in moscow, a meeting of the supreme state council of the union state alexander lukashenko and vladimir putin discussed a number of issues. including the progress in the implementation of allied programs and the implementation of the provisions

of the agreement on the creation of a union state, as the belarusian leader noted, all 28 allied programs have been implemented by almost 80%. continues to increase and turnover over the past year , the indicator rose clouds. yes, i could not succeed. they are just so, this is how we decided to take us. if they thought seriously, they would not have done it, because the economy, in principle, self-sufficient failed economically began to purposefully finish off military relations intensified rhetoric run. the global armed conflict in the focus of attention of alexander lukashenko and vladimir putin, the security of the union state of the country will continue to increase cooperation in the defense sphere. a decision was made to develop a security concept for the union state. this document intends to formulate the fundamental tasks of our interaction in the sphere of growing tension and the external borders of our states and unleashed sanctions

and information wars against us. finland has completed the process of joining nato, as a result , the alliance's border with russia has doubled since 1947 . helsinki has consistently pursued a policy of neutrality, earning on intermediary trade, it is no accident that the system of agreements that fixed the post-war borders in europe was signed in 1975 between nato countries and the states of the eastern bloc, namely helsinki, but under the influence of the conflict in ukraine, the finnish elites. decided to break all ties with russia and enter into the hostile bloc in moscow has already promised an adequate military technical response to the neighbor's actions. law enforcement affiliated with the democratic party of the united states went on an open attack on donald, something three-quarters of americans believe is persecuting trump, the politically motivated manhattan prosecutor's office accused politicians of forging documents. in connection with the payment of money to a porn star for not disclosing information about their

sexual relationship. it is clear that such a pretext for claims against biden's most rated opponent. everyone thought it was ridiculous trump is doing everything to use the attacks of the prosecutor's office to strengthen his election campaign, the us presidential election will be held in november 2024. during a visit to warsaw, president of ukraine volodymyr zelensky made it clear that the merger of his country with poland could become a new reality in the future , there will be no political or economic non-historical borders between our peoples , zelensky said, while he almost verbatim repeated the words spoken in may last of the year by the polish leader andrzej mduda the other day sergei naryshkin, head of the russian foreign intelligence service, visited minsk. he said bluntly that, according to available data, the polish leadership is preparing to incorporate the western ukrainian lands into its state after the military defeat of kiev. the legendary chinese military strategist

sun tzu in his treatise the art of war wrote the rules of warfare is not to rely on the fact that the enemy will not come, but rely on what i can meet him with, not rely on the fact that he will not attack, but rely on what i will do an attack on oneself is impossible, for him it was indeed formulated back in the 4th century bc, but how accurately it reflects the current moment about how belarus is preparing for the fact that the external program i am glad to welcome vadim borovik political scientist is already present in our studio. hello. good afternoon, i'm alexander mikhailov, head of the bureau of military-political analysis. hello, by tradition, we start our program with millet blitz. do you want peace prepare for war? it's again the number one rule for the state figures, or you think differently in one, please, in general, if your opponent knows that if any unfriendly or aggressive

actions will follow from his side. and you can inflict unacceptable damage on him, then, naturally, as a rule, he refrains from using any weapons, your address or an act of aggression, and we know that no acts of aggression have been committed against countries that possess nuclear weapons, so a preventive measure , good tactical correct nuclear weapons - weapons, deterrence and in the history of possession of nuclear weapons and the use of nuclear weapons. and so much one. eh, a fact, or rather, two facts of use against military purposes. this is the bombing of hiroshiki nagasaki by american troops. therefore, not a single nuclear power has yet been attacked, and nuclear weapons have not been used for offensive purposes for the past almost. well, 80 years this has not happened, therefore, indeed, in the presence of nuclear weapons, you can not be afraid for tomorrow, and indeed a key has happened for the republic of belarus. such a decision that will be adopted in

the coming days, months, and in fact , alexander most of the message to the belarusian people, and alexander lukashenko devoted precisely to this. it was key because, understanding with whom it is in alliance and against whom it is fighting, it is forced to protect itself, and key again, it was said that we are protecting ourselves. how do you think? what reactions, in your opinion, are the most key among western states? looked in russia very seriously and thoughtfully. moreover, now russia of the republic of belarus is bound by new nuclear relations. on the basis of the political analysis bureau, we monitor western networks, western statements and the reactions of the local electorate to the statement of their politicians were very serious

. in fact, neutral, independent of almost all geopolitical centers of power here in the eurasian space, belarus is becoming a military player, that is, a military-political player , and in the geopolitical plane in which we are now, and the first of july, which marked putin lukashenko as the date for the deployment of tactical nuclear weapons on the territory of the republic of belarus this is already such a reminder issue a euroleader on july 1, or get out of the ukrainian case and stop following instructions from washington or fly to the new plane of relations with russia, what else pleases not so? long on meeting of the security council. suddenly they announced the need for a dialogue of spineless europe of course, you can talk endlessly, but let's hear a voice. barrel and his reaction the deployment of russian

nuclear weapons in belarus would mean an irresponsible escalation and a threat to european security. and brussels will introduce new sanctions against minsk, if the belarusian authorities do not stop what is happening, there is no need to scare me. i'm already scared. i already saw. eh, there's a lot in this world. oh, here we are placing nuclear weapons in belarus, we are sanctions against we are leading you, that they forgot and addressed their question to the president. well about what speaks first of all reaction. here the same barrel in the whole european union understand that the jokes are already over and in fact the degree is so high. well, firstly, i want to support my colleague, everything is correctly said the only moment. we have never been aloof from any geopolitical processes. we were at the very edge of the geopolitical divide and

have always been involved in all geopolitical processes and are doing everything to ensure that our the people and our country have not lost sovereignty and peace. since there are a lot of clinical interests, we strengthen we conduct appropriate training about military personnel and e. listen when we talk about the return of tactical nuclear weapons to the territory of belarus. first, we are doing this strictly within the framework of international law, despite the fact that our partners under the budapest agreement have violated their obligations. i mean in washington and london they had to abstain during ours so they violated their agreements, and we we are returning what we had on the territory and so far we are returning only tactical weapons. thank you very much, indeed, moscow and minsk agreed to place russian nuclear weapons on the territory of belarus, a bright step, after all, the mid-1990s, domestic

ammunition. they were located only in their own field, and the americans, who continued to store charges in europe, were criticized by russian diplomacy. in our story on march 25, vladimir putin announced the imminent deployment of tactical nuclear weapons in belarus, while moscow and minsk agreed to do this without violating international obligations on the nonproliferation of nuclear weapons. on the 3rd of april we start training the crew. and on july 1, we are finishing the construction of a special storage facility for practical nuclear weapons on the territory of belarus; we have already helped our city colleagues to re-equip their planes with planes. e belarusian air force 10 aircraft. ready for the use of this type, the first we have already, uh, transferred to belarus for

nuclear weapons will be placed near the border. with poland thus a union state will increase the possibility of ensuring their security, part of the belarusian ground attack aircraft gained the ability to strike at enemy targets with investigative defeats in nuclear equipment. in addition, the fire forces of belarus have a missile system m. immediately, for example, french president emmanuel macron, during his visit to china, declared that no country can deploy nuclear weapons on the territory of another country in response, alexander lukashenko made a radical proposal. i agree with him, therefore it is necessary to withdraw all nuclear weapons to americans from five or six countries where they are located, period. well, i'm generally

a radical in this regard. i believe that nuclear weapons should be brought together in one heap in one heap to destroy them within uh, literally some time. that's all, and chatting, like, how this our friend can do, well , all specialists, so let's put it all together and destroy it. this is the most the best option. in the meantime, we are doing the way they do russian tactical nuclear weapons in belarus - this is a defensive reaction to the current geopolitical situation and a retaliatory step to the uk's statement about the supply of ukraine with ammunition with combined uranium , such weapons are considered dangerous due to radiation dust, which will inevitably lead to pollution of cultivated areas and will create a danger to both local residents and the environment. in addition, many experts note double stan america throughout has been pursuing such a policy together

with european countries for decades. why do the americans do this with their ally on their territory , they teach, by the way, saying their crew of their pilots. uh, use this weapon if necessary. we agreed that we did the same on intensifying negotiations on the return of nuclear weapons to our country. alexander lukashenko said during his message to the people and the national assembly, the president recalled that back in the nineties, when belarus was withdrawing from its territory. soviet nuclear weapons the west dalma guarantees in the field of security, and then he himself trampled on their prevailing circumstances. negotiations with russian president putin on the return of nuclear weapons to belarus specifically on the return of nuclear weapons , which were withdrawn in the nineties and tactical nuclear weapons, the matter may not be limited, the belarusian leader said, if necessary , strategic

weapons will be deployed in belarus a week ago, the order to the military immediately. immediately. it will be necessary . putin and i will decide and introduce it here, if necessary, from strategic weapons, and they must understand this bastards, i'm not trying to intimidate or blackmail anyone, who once i talk about it. i want to secure the belarusian state and provide for the belarusian people. i want to note that in the plot it is quite clearly traced, the cause-and-effect relationship of this decision draws attention to this. now we’ll not only talk about this with a hotel demo, a military analyst, a former high-ranking official of the hungarian ministry of defense, mycelium mk unshackling nuclear weapons on the territory of countries allies. could this be the reason for the low-key reaction of optical nuclear weapons

in belarus then why are some european states so concerned about this? however, russia's status changed in response to poland's actions as americans perceived it as a strategic threat given the difference in territory and population. i 'm not sure that there is some kind of threat to belarus

regarding the buildup. i believe uh the conflict is being scanned now. i believe that this is our russian team naturally. i understand what some countries see courageous situation. unfortunately, the fact that it is russia that is going to escalate the conflict of the policy of the word, rightly, there is always the concept of expediently beneficial and doing. who are those who can afford to take certain actions in response without receiving, so to speak, an asymmetric reaction. look here, when even on the caribbean crisis, they agreed. we removed weapons from cuba. they were supposed to film a head fight

in turkey and sort of, since uh the warsaw pact. it greatly outnumbered them, and they considered tactical weapons. how, with the help, i drew attention to the map of the deployment of tactical nuclear weapons in europe in the united states of america, here you are, colleagues. so they were interested in what, uh, tactical separate weapons make it possible to more effectively resolve some issues on the battlefield. it is necessary to remove the airfield of one charge is enough and accordingly. here it was such an option. ah, confrontation. well, then we disbanded the landscape treaty organization. we basically negotiated in the vein that russia and nato will cooperate to interact nato e assumed obligations, as they are approaching our borders, especially we see this in the baltic states and in poland poland has generally turned into a shock fist a potential poses a threat to the allied state, therefore naturally taking into account the fact that on the eve of even this, putin and the russian federation officially submitted a proposal for

the 10th well, and this proposal was not just meant to be heard, it was put out in the media of western countries. it was evident that carried out by the united states, an operation thought out, read for escalation. the most important idea is the deployment of tactical nuclear weapons on the territory of belarus - this is a step, where are the searches. let's hear it, it's time to place nuclear weapons on the territory of poland , so that they also deter putin, we don't need to use them at all, but it's worth having them, it won't hurt to be in a state of readiness, it must also be said that we will not give our consent, neither to partition nor to blackmail. yes, no matter how germany is now offended by the united states of america, but the key militant violin today is the alliance - it is certainly poland how to respond to such statements alexander the reaction has already been heard in

the actions of our leaders, the leaders of russia , the republic of belarus, and i will remind you about the escalation. i will simply bring to this thought that until the thirteenth year we watched how nato was expanding, and in the zero years, they did not react to a cold, they said, one laughed and mocked. well, the year is 113, when russia directly pointed out to washington that they place mk 41 launchers on the territory of eastern europe, which can be used in any way for the use of anti-aircraft missiles. but as an offensive weapon. they can fire medium-range missiles with tomahawks, and putin spoke directly to washington about this. they kept laughing, that is, they posted. already launchers along our border and continued to laugh. this is after they expanded nato to the east. after they created infrastructures for nuclear weapons in six states of europe and let me remind you also greece, where there are storage facilities for nuclear weapons for thio, and

ammunition can also be placed there. if necessary. again, according to our data, such an infrastructure. the secret is being created in the baltics on the territory of poland , the engineering troops are already working, and one signal from washington is enough to move additional ammunition there. excuse me when a year before the start of a special military operation in the spring of 21. washington began to officially supply ukraine with lethal weapons ufo javelins and so on armored vehicles, lethal weapons were opened in a year across the territory of the russian federation, starting from november december 21 , ammunition began to be delivered to belgorod, bryansk, kursk, voronezh, rostov region , to the crimea of ​​the russian federation. there is to stand and continue to look at all this, that's what the reaction should be. putin what reaction should lukashenka have when, first

of all, the western border is concentrated around his borders weapons heavy weapons polish special forces special forces, in fact, nato are deploying additional ones no longer on a rotational basis, but us military personnel are being transferred on a permanent basis, that is, american units with a division of the airborne forces flew here, but excuse me, something needs to be done, and those actions that are doing our leaders. they are absolutely adequate to the situation of lukashenko , they are still soft politicians. it could have been even tougher, as washington likes to do. but you know, our leaders still respect international law. that's right vadim says we do everything within the framework and grandchildren in the future. and now the historians of the future will judge in our favor this conflict, they of the collective west, i also want to note the american president john f. kennedy compared nuclear weapons with the sword of damocles hanging over our heads on the thinnest thread and the presence of nuclear weapons. one of the sides deters the other from using nuclear weapons by the first

, but for this the first side must be sure that the enemy has nuclear weapons in technical ability, as well as political and psychological readiness this adversary to use nuclear weapons - and nuclear deterrence is detailed in our information. in the theory of nuclear deterrence , it assumes that any country that owns nuclear weapons will not use them first of the fears of a retaliatory nuclear strike. however, nuclear deterrence can also be directed against a non-nuclear adversary, and then the nuclear weapon of the state is interpreted as a unilateral emergency means of countering an attack by superior conventional armed forces or counteracting dusty deterrence. considered the cuban missile crisis in 1962, when the united states resorted to the threat of the use of nuclear weapons, demanding the withdrawal of soviet nuclear missiles, but refrained from such use for fear of a retaliatory strike.

at the same time, the ussr at the time of the crisis had about 17 times less nuclear and missile arsenal than the united states. however, even this ratio turned out to be enough to trigger the psychology of nuclear deterrence, and it works, but listen here, the united states will act a little more cunningly. and you have to understand it, they nevertheless. interested in dragging this conflict into some kind of economic fire, we see an attempt, and this will continue in georgia, afghanistan is on pause, the north caucasus, and so on , not without reason. for example, they invite armenia to a democratic azerbaijan summit of any kind of weapons. their task is destabilization, internal economically serious damage , our actions that we are taking to move to belarus means, and tactical nuclear weapons are absolutely correct action is necessary and it is a good preventive measure. but here's what my colleague said. we are very responsible and careful in this matter. we must think to be responsible, but at the same time we need it.

ah, that means a strategic initiative, and i asked the head of state the question that we should try to demonstrate a threat, not in europe to nato, but on the territory of the united states of america , electric pressure plays a very important role for them. and now, if they again felt somewhere in la america they were placed on a tactical russia's nuclear potential, then, perhaps, this is the pressure that would have been exerted only for years. i say that it was not necessary to get involved in this special military provocation by the united states at all because they got involved according to the scenario in washington . or they should have done it this way, that is, there is only one option, either to do it in such a way that it would be of high quality to break their scenario is very profitable for them. i say it again, when the ministry of defense of the russian federation announces or all the statistics on losses in washington applauds the opposing parties. well done mutual destruction industry instead, the destruction of manpower and equipment. you would do this according to the scenario in washington , today we need to demonstrate to two

countries washington and london. this is one firm that runs europe today that they are existentially threatened. how to do it? we must also talk about the reaction of washington. can the us decide to transfer nuclear tactical charges from the bases that are now in the same netherlands and belgium to poland and lithuania as a mirror, again , next actions, or is it still a degree. uh, the voltage will be reduced. as you think, you know, uh, in general, the statement about the movement of tactical weapons on the territory of belarus, it, firstly, has a sobering effect on the western elites. and we draw such and such conclusions based on the analysis of public reactions to the statement in russia and belarus and the response to the reactions in the statements of western politicians. they are confused. they are confused. their cards are mixed up. they did not predict such a move on the part

of our coalition, one must understand that against of the collective west, the coalition of russia and its allies has entered into a very serious confrontation. perhaps, stretched out for many years, it is right that we return in memory in the sixty-second year after the caribbean crisis, in which ours won. it is we who forced them to withdraw weapons from our continent. and it was precisely after the parisian prince that the soviet union lived quietly for 30 years, not being afraid of any military attacks. yes, whoever on the planet, er, would dare to fish. sorry for the soviet union after the caribbean crisis, probably sounds the need to demonstrate, first of all , our military-technical capabilities. moreover , putin recently mentioned this. we have a nuclear test site on novaya zemlya where the tsar bomb of 58 megatons and a number of other nuclear weapons were once detonated. again, we are no longer held back by the treaty of the day. oh, how will he be able to deter, when the americans place their nuclear weapons with their yes military

and political allies through nato well, how does the union state of russia belarus differ from the allied ties within nato yes nothing, basically. this is the same collective will to use the existing weapons correctly tells lukashenka that the strategists. so far, no one touches, and they are just more afraid of on us soil , because it is with strategic weapons that we will hit america if, of course, it dares to start a nuclear war with our allied state. let's not even talk about it. i hope this hello it's not hello usa euro leaders yet. and by the way, we can expect that the eu neighbors in the light of new realities will contribute to the fact that the same hotheads in the same poland and other baltic countries, the basis, excitedly. look how washington is now threatening and saying that there will be unacceptable damage to the russian federation now they are calm, and today they are canceling

the byte. he says that today we are at the peak of economic development. everything is wonderful with us. and as they say, do not be nervous. america so far, what they say, so today we do not succumb to the provocation of the russian federation in this game. we don't play. we see that brussels is more worried about this that's right, they have a reason to pull their card again almost under the external control of washington and, of course, in this situation there should be a very responsible policy. but once again i want to take us all away from these righteous moods. it couldn't have been done the day before. here is his. it's a shame to this propaganda, which convinced everyone that everything is simple, now i want us to take a cold shower already, we thought, very pragmatically, very thought out. it must be understood that the chinese position will be very restrained, balanced, deliberate, no one will lie down. please say yes to the decision to deploy tactical nuclear weapons. it could have been discussed with the same gentleman

, the seat could have been negotiated, but listen, maybe, yes, therefore, in this case it will not be absolutely true, but you understand, trade between china and russia is 3%. all us 12 with europe over 30. let's trade comparison. you cannot get down. here is some kind of medicine. you can't have it right away. apply understand or not, taking into account all trade economic relations, nothing is done quickly, therefore now the russian federation must understand very clearly today that a very large burden of responsibility is on the russian federation and in relation to belarus. it behaves very decently . after all, russia took on all the costs of this military operation. this is a very decent behavior, and often our presence in the russian market largely compensates for our losses in western markets, but in this situation. we must understand everything. everything can develop for us not according to such a favorable scenario, and i i’ll even say more that the united states will arrange a small tactical battle with tactical nuclear weapons in europe. thanks a lot. vadim will talk about this in more detail, we will tell our

respected viewer. what is the difference between tactical and strategic? i remind you that on the air the sas program is authorized to declare we are talking about tactical nuclear weapons and not only the belarusian military received the iskander m missile system. defense minister shoigu said on april 3 at a training ground in russia that means training belarusian viewers to explain enough, it is clear what is the difference between tactical nuclear weapons and strategic tactical nuclear weapons, they are of low power. well , of course, in comparison with strategic nuclear weapons e , we can give an example, let's say the power of nuclear weapons, and based on, let's say from the explosion of a nuclear bomb throughout russia this was about 15 kilotons wasted by violet tape. and let's compare it with the recent explosion. take it. our schedule was very well known. this is how

the defeat zones of ammunition 100 ct look like, yes, that is, to understand an average of up to 30-40 kilotons, ammunition is called tactical nuclear weapons, usually more powerful ammunition already belongs to the category of strategic ammunition, because the use of such ammunition is already causing damage to the side that is used on the battlefield, therefore striking factors should not go in. they gave 15-20 km there, because tactically i found it possible to use heavy artillery, not only aircraft and not only missiles to deliver ammunition, therefore 2-3 kilotons and here is the power of artillery tactical nuclear munitions, aviation munitions and rocket munitions have more serious power. pay attention to the iskander-m complex on enemy radars, it accelerates on the march to 6-7 mach numbers, that is, it overcomes the hypersonic barrier, which starts at about six mach numbers . and in fact, this complex, firstly, as an

operational-tactical complex, that is, up to 500 km, it hits everything and everything, again, first of all, it hits air defense systems and counter -battery equipment , enemy radar equipment, that is, large powerful and technically equipped, essentially military bases that take place on the territory of eastern europe and, of course, the europeans who encountered the scanner back in the kaliningrad region, when russia first placed it there in our enclave, yes, which is surrounded, in fact. e nato then there was still a lot of hype when the europeans read the affected area, it turned out that it reaches the borders of e france spain italy in addition to this semicircle, now, when tactical nuclear weapons will be deployed in belarus and can be used both by missile means and by means of military aviation. moreover, modern russian-made combat aircraft are in service. and the belarusian air force, for europe, is such a double

shower, you understand the contrast at first, kaliningrad now, belarus and what's next? and if the strikes are carried from the two territories of kaliningrad and belarus, then almost the entire european territory will be shot through, and then no america will help them, because so far there is no air defense system or air defense system of such a level to shoot down a missile from kander, i will once again emphasize the importance of the difference between tactical nuclear weapons and strategic ones, because even among experts i have met the opinion that the missile will fly far away from the almost complete states, but it is important to note that intercontinental missiles are shown in many ways the concept of tactical strategic weapons. and here even more emphasis is placed. as you rightly said at a distance. and on the uh application of the purposes of application, a colleague correctly said that, as a rule, tactical weapons are used on battlefield in such a way as to minimize

losses to their own armed forces, so the charge is smaller and cause maximum damage. to avoid using confidential weapons. yes, that is, in order to bomb a certain settlement, you need hundreds of missiles , large accumulations of military equipment and forces. and you can destroy this object by using one or two charges, but you understand, tactical nuclear weapons, if they are used in a populated area, like strategic nuclear weapons in a city, there are already charges may be more than even 20. kt, respectively. it will be a huge destructive force, which will be comparable, but, of course, e is not so powerful with application and strategies. it will be possible to say in more detail, in fact, the location in europe is on the border. so let's say, in addition to kaliningrad and ie, on the border with us, the european union and the nato bloc, e tactical weapons pose a direct threat to these named capitals, and today they

understand that aggression against the address will already be a response to a blow that will inflict unacceptable damage to these states. this is a serious preventive measure for use on the battlefield, or for a limited nuclear strike. they serve to destroy targets in a certain area without large-scale radioactive contamination and tactical nuclear weapons. it has never been used in a real military conflict by nuclear powers. such as the united states or russia believe that conventional modern weapons are enough to achieve tactical goals. and in addition, more than one nuclear power. still. did not want to risk unleashing the second year in the united states they tested an artillery atomic charge with a capacity of 15 tons, and this began the history of tactical nuclear weapons. artillery can look at the screens to see how it all looks, but, to be honest, if we talk about future plans.

how can there be further development of relations between russia and the republic , belarus, within the framework of the union state? probably, we still need to say a few words about the development of start-3, because now it turns out that belarus is also connected with the russian federation in some way the terms of this contract situation. it’s quite complicated there, because we are already at the beginning of the pandemic. we don’t conduct mutual with the americans, but we don’t send mutual missions to control deployed nuclear weapons at strategic facilities. and in fact. for these three years , we did not observe each other and accept the american americans , in turn, delayed the answer for a very long time . as a result, russia announced the suspension of putin’s message that was delivered before alexander grigorievich to our federal assembly. and russia's membership in start-3 belarus does not yet plan or deploy strategic nuclear weapons on its territory. we have to understand that student

nuclear weapons is a triad, it's not just, uh, intercontinental ballistic missiles. this is just rather the type of strategic weapon that is gradually becoming a thing of the past. this is already a kind of archaism, because there is a nuclear submarine fleet and a constantly plying international water supply for the american continent, because we can deliver strikes, both from the east and west coast. again, our analysts read at the end of the soviet era that to destroy 80% of the us industrial potential and almost 100% of the us social capital, we only need about 100 ammunition of about 800 kilotons. tnt to the violet tape, that is, in principle, 2-3 nuclear submarines with a full air defense set it will not work about american air defense in general, about it is still for the countries of the second and third world. this is not against russia, and even more so not against china already, because i remind you that since last year, china has become hypersonic,

power and put into service two hydrosonic products. what the americans still cannot do, what russia did 6 years ago and 5 years ago, officially, by putting hypersonic weapons into service. and here such a rubicon arises when the americans reach the point of putting into service their own hypersonic carriers. that's when and this is 24-25 years according to our approximate calculations. that's when the age of a completely different usa will come , firstly, they will try to dominate even more. second, it starts. in my opinion military conflict. with china, it is after this moment that they are pulling, they are pulling this story with china, because so far they do not have hypersound in the field of battles in the sea. china , of course, will sink their alugs very simply, and they will have nothing to intercept its non- prosonic american missiles. they will give their hypersound and begin a very serious escalation in the asia-pacific region. by the way, this, in a sense, did become america's exit point from the ukrainian case,

because they will not be able to run two companies of an offensive nature on different fronts, but for china, the time of the chip is also coming, because china is now very closely watching the conflict in ukraine, it is very carefully studying the performance characteristics of american weapons, in general , certain international treaties that previously worked after that, but stopped their work. naturally, the world community suddenly after the decision of minsk and moscow grunted that they had forgotten about the treaty. they are the proliferation of nuclear weapons. but vadim was right when he said that these are nuclear weapons. returns to where it already was what well , we cannot say about the actions of the united states of america even earlier, that is, we understand. now, naturally, the borders are being redrawn. naturally, the hegemon loses its status, but and besides this , some kind of international legal norm, in general, some kind of certain one. uh, the scheme of the further work of the world society will have to be fast. we have

all applicable international legal norms. unfortunately, humanity lined up after the bloody meat grinder. world war i the war were forced, then to negotiate. yes, the second world war is already the un and, again , they were forced to negotiate, and those were exceptions. you see, you understand the world was divided. and the winner gets everything, you understand, and one bloc tilted one part of the world, someone else says that he tilted more fairly, but that bloc won - this is a fact and the united states today, as a winner , believes that as a winner all laurels are for the winner. you understand what the paradigm of their thinking is today, and now they had a chance, how the winner can build a fairer the system of international relations may be, retaining some economic control, but providing an opportunity for other subjects. eh, feel comfortable. today we understand that a number of countries in the world today are satellites of the united states of america, well, they are not even satisfied with the role of equal partners. even in the eu, they

subjugated them a little, understand what south korea is, the same japan is also in many ways economically military- military-political, primarily dependent states from the united states, and today the question arose that such states as the russian federation yeltsin who, uh, applauded washington for uh, the right instructions in building russian completely different, in general philosophy, not 5,000 years consider themselves to be under heaven and other countries are in a slightly different status. do not forget about this and one moment. that's what russia should be ready for and we need to understand the situation very carefully americans know how to negotiate, outside. remember agreements. saudi arabia at one time and it’s not a fact that in the x-hour they may not agree in asia, this moment, which can put on the map the question of simply sharing russia in their own interests.

you are already the most important contradiction, as long as you are afraid to talk about it, while it is not profitable for you, but in the fourteenth year i said that poland would be strengthened by the counterbalance to germany and everyone smiled on television here to speak to the message, and now russia is your most important contradiction, overpopulated china is economically powerful, which has the potential and russia beyond the urals 14 million. regions are often not well-equipped in society, you know? in this i will think let's vadim fight the enemies that we have. tomorrow they are today, today you need to understand that the situation is very serious. and the russian federation should come out of this conflict so strong that it would be alexander lukashenko at the time of the message. i think you have noted key words that were addressed not to the belarusian people, but to the ukrainian people and their leadership, my friends. sit down at the negotiating table, because if the russian military-industrial complex starts its work at full capacity. here, then no one will talk about anything. i’ll just add that the special operation was forced

by a measure, and we couldn’t do anything. i’ll already explain why you could continue to sit and watch how they continue to stuff ukraine to attack, to border their belarus regions. ukraine, shells would fly from your villages, your villages, your cities, as we had in belgorod, kursk, bryansk in sly. i wouldn’t conduct a special, i’m more than sure that a babayad company would start after those very scandalous campaigns of the twentieth year in belarus, which they also observed with russia and were very worried about the status of the president of belarus , whether he would withstand pressure, we observed with pressure from outside europe, how they beat belarus and so on, how they pumped their money, and i remember very well the twelfth year in russia because i would imagine a rally on poklonnaya gora, which was about the state anti-bog and i was in the thick of it. all these events 11 years ago, he knows all this money went through him, and our position. they were walking that's when the bandits in the twelfth year. only it didn’t work out what it turned out to turn out in

kiev and it didn’t work out, then in minsk a very similar story. i want to say that if they hadn’t started a special operation, now, if you continued to observe all this disgrace that has been happening in ukraine since the nineteenth year, because, to be honest, we hoped that zelensky would be more adequate than poroshenko and krivoy rog here is a russian speaker from eastern ukraine, by the way, he speaks ukrainian worse than russian. but what we got in return is a controlled puppet, but, unfortunately, we are absolutely right. the only moment. i generally agree with you. you are right in everything the only moment when we say we were forced, we already lost, you know, we were forced, we made it over. yes, yes, i am on the side of the russian federation, they forced us. this is already a bad second 500,000 victims from two ukraine received the latest weapons. the accumulation of military force. russia as they say

will run to its fullest. how many millions? will we put more? what is the motivation of the majority of citizens of the russian federation