[000:00:00;00] finnish america hosted russia's tactical nuclear potential , perhaps this pressure that the electrical masses would exert on washington could influence their decision-making, that is, maybe some other asymmetric actions. they are sure to have this option. but today we are with you. what we are doing today are fulfilling washington's scenarios . i have been saying this for more than a year, and i say that it was not necessary to get involved in this special us military provocation at all because we got involved according to washington's scenario or it is necessary it was to do so, that is, there was only one option , either to do it in such a way that it was a jewelry -quality war, it can only be effective quickly, and if it didn’t work out, then there’s still no option. so today we need to break their script to their advantage. i say it again when the ministry of defense of the russian federation announces either all the statistics, and washington’s losses are applauded by both sides. well done mutual destruction of the industry of manpower and equipment. you would do this according to the scenario of washington to us today with

you need about the two countries of washington and london. this is one firm that runs europe today that they are existentially threatened. how to do it? we need to think, uh, work out this solution, but for now, we are carrying out their scenario. nothing good will happen alexander, but again, we are talking about washington’s reaction . can the united states decide to transfer nuclear tactical charges from the bases that are now in the same netherlands and belgium to poland or leo as a mirror, again regular actions, or still a degree. uh, the voltage will be reduced. as you think, you know, uh, in general, the statement about the movement of tactical weapons on the territory of belarus, firstly, it has a sobering effect on the western elite. and we draw such and such conclusions based on an analysis of public reactions to the statement in russia

and belarus and the response to the reactions. statements of western politicians, they are at a loss, they are confused. their cards are mixed up. they did not predict such a move on the part of our the coalition must understand that the coalition of russia and its allies is working against the collective west and has entered into a very serious confrontation. perhaps, stretched out over many years, it is right that we return in monuments in the sixty -second year after the caribbean crisis, in which our country won, that we forced them to withdraw their weapons from our continent. and it was precisely after the paris policy that the soviet union lived quietly for 30 years, not being afraid of any military attacks. yes, who on the planet, uh, would dare to fish. sorry in soviet union after the caribbean crisis, when the americans wiped themselves off and took out their missiles and nuclear weapons. that's right in our discourse, probably, the need sounds. demonstration, firstly, of our military technical capabilities. moreover, putin

recently mentioned this. the nuclear test site on novaya zemlya, where the tsar bomb of 58 megatons and a number of other nuclear weapons were once blown up. again, we are no longer constrained by the treaty of the day. oh, how can we deter, when the americans place their nuclear weapons at their yes military-political leninak allies, well, how does the union state of russia and belarus differ from the allied ties within nato yes, nothing, in fact. this is the same collective will to use the existing weapons correctly tells lukashenka that strategic weapons. so far, no one touches, and they are just more afraid of on us soil, because it is with strategic weapons that we will hit america if, of course, it dares to start a nuclear war with our allied state. let's not even talk about it. i hope, what is hello it's not yet hello us euro leaders. and by the way, we can expect that

the eu neighbors in the light of new realities. contributes to the fact that the same hotheads in the same poland and other baltic countries, especially excited. look how calm washington is now. that's when they talked about some kind of nuclear capabilities of russia in the black region of the black sea, then they immediately began to threaten and say that there would be unacceptable damage to the russian federation, now they are calm. uh, the bayton is being canceled today. says we're at our peak today economic development. everything is wonderful with us. and as they say, the american woman is not nervous, as long as they say, so today we do not succumb to the provocation of the russian federation in this game. we don't play. we see that brussels is more worried. it's nearby. yes, and again they began to pull the blanket over themselves with this card. they have already trampled germany in europe, now they generally want to completely disarm it, so to speak. well , germany almost fell under the external control of washington, and of course, in this situation, one should be very responsible

politics, but i once again. i want to take away all these righteous moods. it couldn't have been done the day before. that's it, it's a shame. uh, this propaganda, which convinced everyone that everything is simple, now i want us to take a cold shower already, thinking, very pragmatically, very deliberately. it must be understood that the chinese position will be very restrained , balanced and deliberate, because yes the decision to deploy tactical nuclear weapons. it could have been discussed with the same gentleman , it could have negotiated, but listen correct sites bitterness answers my question in one. you asked a question that we cannot fully answer, taking into account all the nuances and international obligations. therefore, in this case it will not be absolutely correct, but you understand, trade between china and russia is 3%. all us 12 with europe over 30. let's trade comparison. you cannot get down. here is some kind of medicine. you cannot immediately replace it, whether you understand it or not, given all the trade and economic

relations, nothing is done quickly. that's why now the russian federation must understand very clearly today that a very large burden of responsibility is on the russian federation and in relation to belarus. it behaves very decently . after all, russia took on all the costs of this military operation. this is very decent behavior, and often our presence on the russian market largely compensates for our losses on western markets, but in this situation we must understand everything. everything may not turn out according to such a favorable scenario for us, and i will tell you i’ll even say more that a small tactical battle with tactical nuclear weapons in europe will suit the united states. thanks a lot. vadim will talk about this in more detail, we will tell our respected viewer. what is the difference between tactical and strategic? i remind you that on the air the sas program is authorized to declare we are talking about tactical nuclear weapons and not only the belarusian military received the iskander-m missile system capable of using

nuclear missiles, minister raven shoigu said from april 3 at a test site in russia it means training the belarusian calculations of the complex, as he noted, and by the way , alexander appeals to you to our respected audience to explain enough, it’s clear what is the difference between tactical nuclear weapons and strategic tactical nuclear weapons, they are of low power. well , of course, in comparison with strategic nuclear weapons e , we can give an example, let's say the power of nuclear weapons, and based on, let's say from the explosion of a nuclear bomb throughout russia this was about 15 kilotons wasted by violet tape. and let's say. compare it with the recent beret explosion. that picture was very famous all over the world and watched about 2 kg wasted the equivalent of power. here is this explosion of saltpeter made up, that is. here, look. we will now turn

our attention to our schedule. this is how the destruction zones of 100 kt ammunition look like, yes, that is, to understand an average of up to 30-40 kilotons , ammunition is called tactical nuclear weapons, usually in greater e, more powerful ammunition already belongs to the category of strategic ammunition, because the use of such ammunition is already inflicted damage, and to the side that is used on the battlefield, so the damaging factors should not go in. they gave 15-20 km there, because tactically i found it possible to use heavy artillery, not only aircraft and not only missiles to deliver ammunition, therefore 2-3 kilotons and here is the power of artillery tactical nuclear munitions, aviation munitions and rocket munitions have more serious power. pay attention to the iskander m complex - this is a unique weapon, the rocket flies at high altitude and maneuvers practically no e, not reflected on enemy radars accelerates. marches up to 6-7 mach numbers, that is, it overcomes the hypersonic

barrier, which starts at about 6 mach numbers and in fact. uh, this complex, firstly, as an operational-tactical complex , that is, up to 500 km, hits everything and everything, again , first of all, it hits air defense systems and counter -battery equipment , enemy radar equipment, that is, large powerful and technically equipped, essentially military bases that take place on the territory eastern europe and, of course, the europeans who encountered the scander back in the kaliningrad region, when russia first placed it there in our enclave, yes , which is surrounded, in fact. e nato then there was still a lot of hype when the europeans calculated the affected area, it turned out that it reaches the borders. france spain italy approximately this semicircle, now, when tactical nuclear weapons will be deployed in belarus and can be used as missiles. so it is with the means of military aviation,

especially since modern combat aircraft russian-made are in service with the belarusian air force, and for europe it is such a double shower, you understand the contrast at first, kaliningrad now, belarus and what's next? and if the strikes are carried from the two territories of kaliningrad and belarus, then almost the entire european territory will be shot through, and then no america will help them, because so far there is no air defense system or air defense system of such a level to shoot down a rocket from a scanner once again emphasized the importance differences between tactical nuclear weapons and strategic ones, because e and even met among experts, the opinion is that missiles are flying almost to the united states, but it is important to note that intercontinental missiles are not yet being discussed. well, in belarus, firstly, now all experts agree that the concept is blurred in many ways. and tactical and strategic weapons, and here even more emphasis is placed. as you rightly

said at a distance and on the e-e application of the objectives of the application. that's right, a colleague said that, as a rule, tactical nuclear weapons are used on the battlefield in such a way in a way to minimize losses to their own armed forces, so the charge is smaller and inflict maximum damage. to avoid using confidential weapons. yes, that is, in order for you to smash some settlement, you need hundreds of missiles, large accumulations of military equipment and forces. and you can use one or two charges to destroy this object, but you understand that a tactical nuclear weapon, if it is used in a populated area, is like a strategic nuclear weapon in the same city and the charges can be even more than twenty kiloton, respectively, it will be a huge destructive force, which will be comparable, but natural. e is not so powerful with the application it will be possible to deta.

it would be more correct to say that in fact the deployment in europe on the border, so to speak, besides kaliningrad and uh on the border of uh, with uh, the european union and the nato bloc, tactical left-wing weapons pose a direct threat to these named capitals, and today they understand that aggression is already to the address will be retaliated, which will cause unacceptable damage to these states. this is a serious countermeasure. once again i emphasize tactical nuclear weapons - these are small nuclear charges along with delivery vehicles intended for use on the battlefield or for delivering a limited nuclear strike. they serve to destroy targets in a certain area without large-scale radioactive contamination and tactical nuclear weapons. never used in a real military conflict, nuclear power. such as the united states or russia believe that conventional modern weapons are sufficient to achieve tactical goals. in addition, no nuclear power has so far been willing to risk starting a nuclear

war after the use of tactical nuclear weapons. and that's what is important in 1952 in the united states they tested an artillery atomic charge with a capacity of 15 km, and the history of tactical nuclear artillery began with this, we can look at the screens there. see how it all looks, but to be honest. frighteningly, despite the fact that there is a different power, yes , alexander, please tell me if we talk about future plans. what can be more development within the framework of the union state relations between russia and the republic , belarus probably, we need to say a few more words about the development of start-3, because now it turns out that belarus is also connected with the russian federation in some way by the terms of this agreement. it is quite complicated there, because we are already at the beginning of the pandemic. we do not conduct mutual, not

sent mutual missions with the americans to control deployed nuclear weapons at strategic facilities. and in fact. for these three years of not observing each other , we have, uh, complete distrust has appeared misunderstanding. what to do next, because russia is ready for the monitoring commission to send its missions and receive americans . the americans, in turn, dragged on for a very long time with an answer in the end. russia, in response to putin's message , which was delivered before alexander grigorievich to our federal assembly, announced the suspension of russia's membership in start-3 belarus has not yet planned or deployed strategic nuclear weapons on its territory. we must understand that with physical nuclear weapons - this is a triad, it's not only uh, intercontinental ballistic missiles. this is just rather the type of strategic weapon that is gradually becoming a thing of the past. here is already a kind of archaism. because there is a submarine nuclear fleet and constantly cruising the international waters

of our nuclear submarine, which carry nuclear warheads. they are precisely the most dangerous for the american continent, because we can strike both from the east and west coasts. again, our analysts calculated at sunset the soviet era is that to destroy 80% of the industrial potential of the united states and almost 100% of the social capital of the united states, we only need about 100 ammunition of about 800 ct of tnt violet. that is, in principle, two or three nuclear submarines with a full ammunition load, maces with separating warheads and there are no us americans are well aware that they are against these weapons. their air defense systems will not work and about american air defense in general. this is still for the countries of the second and third world. this is not against russia, and even more so against china and already, because since last year, china has become a hypersonic power and put into service two hypersonic products. what the americans

still cannot do, what russia did six years ago and 5 years ago, officially, by putting hypersonic weapons into service. and here such a rubicon arises when the americans reach the point of putting into service their own hypersonic carriers. that's when and this is the year 24-25 by our approximate calculations. that's when the age of a completely different usa will come. first, they will try dominate even more. second, it starts. in my opinion, a military conflict. with china , it is after this moment that they are pulling, they are pulling this story with china, because so far they do not have hypersound in the field of battles in the sea . china, of course, will sink their aurugs, very simply, and they will have nothing to intercept its giprosonic missiles , the americans will create their own kind of sound and begin a very serious escalation in the asia-pacific region. by the way, this, in a sense, will become

america's exit point from the ukrainian case, because they they won’t be able to lead two companies of an offensive nature on different fronts, but for china, chepa is coming at the same time, because china is now very closely watching the conflict in ukraine, it is very carefully studying the performance characteristics of american weapons, in general , very carefully done for itself, because they have to fight with this weapon in two or three years. by the way, alexander, tell me, we are talking about certain international treaties that previously worked after that. and, of course, the world community stopped their work suddenly after the decision of minsk and moscow grunted that they had forgotten about the treaty, they were spreading nuclear weapons. but vadim was right when he said that these are nuclear weapons. it returns to where it already was, which we cannot say about the actions of the united states of america even earlier, that is, we understand. now, naturally, the borders are being redrawn. naturally, the hegemon loses its status, but in addition to this, some kind of international legal norm, in general, some kind of specific scheme for the further

work of the world society will have to built all the existing international legal norms. unfortunately, humanity lined up after the bloody meat grinder. the first world war were forced, then to negotiate. yes, the second world war is already the un and, again, they were forced to negotiate. and those were the exceptions. you see, you understand the world was divided. and i have already said more than once the world was divided and the ussr and the usa acted in the paradigm of winners, the winner gets everything , you understand, and one block tilted one part of the world, the other someone says that he tilted more fairly, but that bloc won - this is a fact and the united states today, as a winner, believes that as a winner all laurels are for the winner. you understand what the paradigm of their thinking is today, and now they had a chance, as a winner, to build a more equitable system of international relations, perhaps retaining economic control to some extent, but providing an opportunity for other subjects. eh,

feel comfortable. today we understand that a number of countries in the world today are satellites of the united states of america, well, they are not even happy with the role of precious partners. even in the eu, they obeyed them a little, understand, what is south korea, the same japan, also in many respects in economic terms, military -military-political, primarily dependent states of the united states, and today the question has become, what are states like the russian federation? restored their economy military power political elite has changed its perception in the world. remember kozyrev who came to the united states and asked what russian foreign policy to bring or yeltsin who, uh, applauded washington for , uh, correct instructions in building russian democracy. no, putin came, another political elite came, and the international community is not perceived differently. the same china from the beginning at the beginning of the 2000s, a completely different relationship could be quickly and populated states. it's different about this is the second economy of the world, which is completely different, in general philosophy does not consider itself under

heaven for 5,000 years. and other countries are in a slightly different status. do not forget about this and one moment. that's what russia should be ready for, and it is necessary to understand the situation very carefully . the americans know how to negotiate on time. remember the agreements with saudi arabia at one time and it’s not a fact that in the x-hour they may not agree in asia, this moment, which can put on the map the question of simply dividing russia in their interests, because the most important contradiction, while you are afraid of to say this until it is profitable for you, but in the fourteenth year i said that the counterbalance to germany would be more strengthened and everyone smiled on tv here. poland is the main player in europe in the military planet today the president is talking about this in a message and here you have russia, the main contradiction, overpopulated china is economically powerful, which has the potential and russia beyond the urals 14 million. regions are often not settled in society. let's fight as one with

the enemies that are but, but they are tomorrow they are today today you need to understand that the situation is very serious. and the russian federation must emerge from this conflict so strong that it a worthy partner of china is not weakened, but strong, because any strong. yes, not only alexander lukashenko spoke during the message. i think you have noted key words that were addressed not to the belarusian people, but to the ukrainian people and their leadership, my friends. sit down at the negotiating table, because if the russian military-industrial complex starts its work at full capacity. here, then no one will talk about anything. chips will fly, and i think, alexander, you will agree with me. i'll just add what the special operation was forced by the measure, and we could not do anything. i have already explained why you could continue to sit and watch how they continue to push into these ukraine

, armed with ammunition. to your heavy artillery, which is already starting to shoot at the russian regions, imagine if shells would fly from the border regions of belarus of ukraine, your villages, your villages , your cities, as we did in belgorod, in kursk, in bryansk, in lukashenka , i would not conduct more than sure we started would be a military company after those very scandalous campaigns of the twentieth year, which belarus also watched with russia and were very worried about the status of the president of belarus, would he withstand pressure, we watched with pressure from europe how they hit belarus and so on, how they pumped their money, and i remember very well the twelfth year in russia because i would imagine a rally on poklonnaya hill, which was about the state anti-bog and i was in the thick of all these events 11 years ago and how much money was handed out to us then for the coup, which did not take place. i'm not going to voice on mcfoo now. all this money knows, all this money passed through him, and our position. they were walking that's when the bandits in the twelfth year. du only failed

to pull off what he managed to pull off in kiev and failed to pull off, then in minsk a very similar story. i want to say that if the special operation hadn’t been started, now, if we continue to observe all this disgrace that was happening in ukraine starting from the nineteenth year, because, to be honest, we hoped that zelensky would be more adequate than poroshenko, he himself is from krivoy rog, he is from eastern ukraine, he speaks russian. by the way, he speaks ukrainian worse than russian. but what did we get in return for a controlled puppet. this is the theme of our program. we are absolutely right. the only moment. i generally agree with you. you are right in everything the only moment when we say we were forced, we already lost, you know, we were taken out, we made the same winners, we will judge. god forbid, i'm on the side of the russian federation, we were forced to. this is already a bad second of 500,000 casualties on both

sides of the dead. and killed. why is alexander lukashenko's position to sit down at the negotiating table, because now ukraine has received the latest weapons, the accumulation of military force, russia, as they say, will launch to its fullest. how many millions? we will also suppose, and what is the motivation of the majority of the citizens of the russian federation of ukraine ? understand by tv fighters. we have a lot on tv. especially, which even the military departments did not pass, but you of any officer who passed the army, at least, did not even fight. ask and i remember i was at the military department. colonel. he says, listen, here you are arguing, swearing, and i carried the guys of your age in my arms from the field, you understand, why did the president of belarus say that enormous damage is being done, the infrastructure of the economy, the demographic will be a disaster, the criminalization of society and so on - this inflicts a sharp blow around both the russian federation and belarus. why is greeting the president of belarus what? sit down at the

negotiating table they will start the issue. how many bones under these uh negotiating table will be at this point. thank you very much. dear guests, for our discussion about sore issues, we could not complete our program, of course, i would like an expression of confidence that deterrence will fully work on the basis of the actual use of nuclear weapons. it will never come to pass that those who in western capitals are too carried away by life in the moment will think about the eternal and , of course, i will not leave you without a philosophical quote this time again from the work of my beloved viktor pelevin why life has become so cheap dostoevsky thought yes because death is cheap earlier , 20,000 people died in battle and they remembered it for centuries, because each of these 20,000 people had to be personally slaughtered to release the guts that did not falter in one battle.

the huge army of demons living in the human mind. and now, to kill 20,000 , it is enough to press the button for a demonic feast, so little thanks. well, now i am authorized to declare. security threats to belarus from the west forced minsk to resort to nuclear deterrence tv channel belarus 24 broadcasts for you around the clock, do not switch our daily task to talk about belarus in the country and abroad. more than 100 million viewers around the world have access to the projects

of our tv channel, belarus generous picturesque and monumental sports and teamwork, we tell

you not only about significant events, we introduce you to active, energetic and inspiring people who live in belarus and do everything for its development, belarus can be different to understand and feel. she needs to be seen with her own eyes. joint plans for the development of cooperation between belarus and tatarstan were discussed today in minsk at a meeting of the working group of communications

; has grown by one and a half times now in the work of dozens of joint projects with a focus on import substitution and industrial operation a very honest relationship. here were established last year by the belarusian metallurgical plant. we started supplying metal products there , heavy metal port products, that is, for the tires of enterprises of tatarstan, and practically replaced the products that were presented earlier in budapest , the belarusian hungarian business starts. forum representatives of the company of the ministry and financial institutions will discuss steps to develop economic relations. also there will be a meeting of the intergovernmental commission of belarus to hungary now the trade turnover between the countries is about 200 million dollars , however, the potential, according to the parties, is much greater development of cooperation the purpose of the visit of belarusian foreign minister sergei oleynik to hungary on the eve of the meeting with the minister of agriculture discussed

cooperation in the field of agriculture today is world aviation day and cosmonautics 62 years ago yuri gagarin said the legendary let's go and made the world's first orbital space flight, belarus about his presence in space was first announced on july 22 , 2012, when it launched its earth remote sensing satellite. a year later, the committee it is on the use of outer space for peaceful purposes. recognized our country as a space power in 2024. the first in the history of a sovereign belarus woman will fly into space. this project is being implemented jointly by belarus and russia within the framework of an agreement. now, in principle, all issues have been agreed upon between the heads of state and the government. uh, it’s filmed , training will begin already, the direction of the main cosmonaut here, the cosmonaut and the understudy. well, we will continue to prepare science requires costs from a costly mechanism, but using