with the coach, the decision is that it's probably better for me to be the coach. she was very hurt somewhere in her soul, but she didn’t see much. it was insanely difficult, it was, i would say , it hurts a lot when your dream was taken away from you simply because you just don’t pass by some parameters. here, and then, well, i just got used to it. i mean, i don't. but she did not give up until the last very strong willpower. she has a lot of perseverance in 2009, when she was almost finishing school. i met a rebaking coach who already at that time he worked with the mogilev paralympians. he says let's try. maybe you can make it. that's where he helped me. he arranged training camps with the paralympic athletes, and somehow we tried to get into the paralympic team. and i have

a high degree of myopia, and i have atrophy of the optic nerve, clarity is lost. here is a bag on the head and walk to see from the stop to see the bus and that's it. the rest of the most memorable was the medal when i came back after a month. i'm on i took third place at the world championships, and i understood that this is the only medal that, well, it will help me break through, in general , into the 12th team and, uh, get a salary, because before that i had to go in for sports, i quit my job. i gave up everything, that is, i had nothing at all. it was the most difficult and the most memorable, these are the sensations that , because i was 10 meters over 20, i fell from impotence, and i just crawled in the literal sense , i crawled to my medal when i realized that he was an athlete. i guess i figured it out after olympics after, when all this one, right there, rose, well, they began to show it from sports. eh, everywhere, it’s different to talk about her

, including the president repeatedly mentioned there and the awards are everything, well, i handed her, so, then i realized that at what level. i did not run the first distance of 15 km at all, that is, there for 10 years, never. that's why the coach and i kind of took a chance, and she said that you don't have to run her, because she can knock out those two races for which i was preparing. i took a risk. i even broke a stick at this distance, and but did not lose her superiority and won. oh, when they found out that there were only tears, but tears of joy and all for the fact that his corpse was rewarded. you understand that all this for so many

years was not in vain. but when it happened like this, one second medal, and then the third one didn’t know me, you know, i had such pride, damn it, all of us people want to be realized in society. here i get it specifically through sports, my motivation is my destiny, no matter how loud it sounds, but i do dirt on it things that, probably, i would not even imagine before. so well done, well done. you and your mom won, right? for me , the family is a support support, well, it is a stone wall, for which i am not afraid. nothing when you look at a person who has no legs or who is blind, and he

is just trying to learn that, in principle, healthy, not everyone can be all of my e friends. who saw these competitions? they say it's just how they do it, they admire it, and i understand that each of them, uh, thought about it anyway, that wow and i, that i can't just simply take it up there from the couch and just do elementary things. that is, it seems to me that this is a huge example, for which there is. well, if you show it.

the oath of each judge is such words that the judge must be unremitting and fair, this montalong, which every judge should strive for, the role of the court, it is far from limited, but purely. with such applied questions of justice, this is a certain respect for all people who are next to you are. my late father said that the inhabitants here is this sense of justice it court to go.

1919, smolensk appears on the geopolitical map of the belarusian soviet socialist republic, a new countdown of history begins and a time for people to comprehend their place under the sun behind the door of evolution, the fateful first all belarusian. congress of the seventeenth year. on the first try. self-determination of belarus failed the idea of ​​the belarusian people's republic and the most difficult period of our history along with the decrees on peace and land, one of the steps of the soviet government.

the declaration on the rights of the peoples of russia, the document made it possible to create a republic that preserves the national culture and traditions of state building in the ussr form a judicial body with the functions of a cassation and supervisory authority 1923 is the starting point for the history of the supreme court, it is inextricably linked with the history of the formation of the belarusian statehood the composition consisted of only three people. and those at the same time occupied other positions in the highest bodies of power and management permanent personnel composition was beyond dreams. this shortcoming did not allow to work effectively and in fact the supreme court was deprived of the opportunity to influence the formation of judicial practice and exercise supervision over the courts in these conditions. his first chairman had to work; he became the people's commissar of internal affairs, pro cop. molokovic, red commander, a fat first world war veteran. these were the times of laying the foundation of the belarusian

judiciary , and one of the authors of the book dedicated to the centenary shares his impressions of his research on history. alexander gayshn. we are in the museum the supreme court, where each document witnesses the era of use. behind the enormous authority of the leadership of the republic, he was still entrusted with combining doses with the writer of the supreme court, this is a man who has spent his whole life. e, he gave it to the service of the belarusian people to the state, in many memoirs it is noted that he was a man of great physical strength, tall with an iron will, a decision according to him. mm. i had to take pretty tough ones at the same time. this was a man who loved people very much, in soviet times, the surname molokovich, it was not often mentioned in the thirty-seventh that he was repressed, a revision of the department was achieved, just his former knees knocked on all doors, including officials from moscow, restoring the honest name of their comrade.

he combined the position of people's commissariat cases, of course, he saw everything exactly the situation in the republic, he initially came up with the initiative that his supreme court should approximately be independent of such a structure for organizing, and such a large-scale judicial activity in general in the ussr, they heard at the top and the beginning of the thirties - this is the first stage rapid development. for example , the supreme court hoped to have the right to consider at first instance criminal cases of exceptional importance, for which the death penalty could be imposed, as well as cases of personal jurisdiction formed by other judicial colleagues, a plenary session of the supreme court appears. it was created as the highest judicial instance, endowed with the authority to administer justice. it was a collegiate body composed of members. the judges of captivity are the mother of the chairman of the supreme court. venom considered protests, tensions decisions of the courts, gave an explanation of the age-old. the period underwent repeated judicial reforms.

the powers of the plenum varied and even happened in the history of the supreme court, that for 20 years in 1938 to 1959. absent here. today at 4:00 am. without any declaration of war, the german armed forces attacked the borders of the soviet union for a long 5 years of a completely different history, like all belarusians

stood shoulder to shoulder for their homeland, part performed the most difficult task in the tribunals, not allowing traitors to escape responsibility already deep. after the war, the court will be handed down more than once, the acquittal of the law of war has always given the opportunity for objectivity. and this is also a feature of the time of the circumstances, part of the story, the verdict was approved literally on half a sheet in blue pencil. it was not subject to, and at the bottom it was drawn with another pencil that he was brought there for execution; it is noteworthy that it was the military courts that dealt with issues of rehabilitation, thereby restoring social justice and the very fact that a court decision in relations between relatives and loved ones was canceled is of very serious importance. that is, the principle that we are talking about today, the principle of justice, has triumphed. yes, despite the fact that

it took. well, quite a significant time the case of the traitors, especially the sound took after the release. minsk, their peak fell on the forty-sixth forty-ninth years. you how many people killed twice i shot. and how many did he kill? i won’t say, they were lying on top of each other, you participated in this crucian carp, huh? haven't been there i can't remember exactly accomplices of the nazis, who killed belarusians, gave their own to the dock, defendants all over the country for nazi awards. i even washed it for food. again he beat the boy, and then for a long time he soon covered you with a shovel of a chicken, all the same he twitches. this child then for this time for three, probably fired a pistol. this is a german for sure, but he chopped russian after the war. these are gangs that

continued to roam the outback, all efforts, including those of the supreme court, were aimed at restoring the rule of law and eliminating the consequences of the occupation of the judge and members of the supreme court, war veterans among them, and maria osipova, hero of the soviet union, the head of the underground in occupied minsk and the inspirer of the liquidation, walk the crayfish-cube, on whose conscience the death of a huge number of civilians was, of course, firstly, willows. have a mosaic. she did it personally. at first they decided to poison him, and then the osipov, and brought him by herself, as the nazis later established, if after the murder of kub of english production, high-profile sentences required great moral strength of all who the trial at the courts was crying not only by the witnesses of the bloody events and the read out sentences, like execution by executioners or long-term imprisonment by fascist hangers-on. they met with applause.

you didn’t send us death, fires shrouded not will, until the wounds were wounded by the hand of soviet justice the wrath of the people overtook you assets fascist jackals , it is clear that for people who passed the roads of the great patriotic war it was important that none of the traitors go unpunished every case of traitors to the motherland by accomplices the fascists, especially as a matter of fact, the restoration of the capital from the ruins was considered common to all people, many judges, and this is in archival sources, participated in the construction of the supreme court, they even created their own garden under the leadership of maria osipova , it was a difficult time, their war subsided for decades, military courts , expanding independence in belarus, the powers for the entire power bloc lasted until 2014 and were abolished, as the courts completely fulfilled their function, by the decision of the belarusian leader. they joined the general

reform of the judiciary. bringing with you the accumulated experience and in general. it can be said that the national justice system, the supreme court, received their own face already in the years of belarusian sovereignty. if we compare all the conditions in which i once started work, then, of course, they were absolutely incomparable with what we have today, uh, this is a paper pen to say something. well, the development of such a serious judicial infrastructure was not necessary. well , the holiday was that, if we partially updated our furniture, then it was already significant economic achievement. it really is. uh, it was a very difficult time with the time of gaining sovereignty, uh, the republic and belarus, we have come a long way. with

the collapse of the soviet union, the lives of millions of people deteriorated in an instant, empty shops were announced by inflation, the hardest times for industry, cooperative ties were destroyed, and the products turned out to be unnecessary to anyone. all this the atmosphere of the beginning of a difficult restoration in belarusian independence is now somehow not very customary to remember this, but we have survived the times when it’s just that there weren’t the most necessary things for a belarusian of my generation, they remember the cards well, where we bought with these coupons everything that a person needs for an elementary life as reiki businessmen. murders are a characteristic feature of this time in a young, fragile country, as well as throughout the post-soviet space, a gang is operating , the fight against them becomes a matter of honor for the entire

law enforcement system and the state. the final designation of exceptionally moderate indications of death is indicated by the execution of these words. thousands of belarusians expected, thanking in the soul head of state, a referendum for the retained death penalty the fame of those who were in the dock thundered throughout the post-soviet space of the people who committed these crimes. in my opinion. they even had plans to come to power and the long existence of this criminal organization was facilitated by the entry of its composition and law enforcement officers. dacha gang morozov and when the next morning

the participants in the investigative action. or in order to conduct a search, the dacha was not on the spot. it was e demolished along with the foundation of all this in the materials of the criminal case. prior to this, history did not know such a numerous and cruel ocg process by its nature and from an emotional point of view it is very difficult to accept serious security peaces, because there were reasons to think that the justice process could be disrupted, or a certain pressure evidence occupies several shelves of the archive of the supreme court fyodor chukovets remembers, each of them was clear even during the trial, not all of the bandits fell into the hands of justice atmosphere we started the trial at nine o'clock and finished 3 hours without a break. after that i went to court and already started, yes.

to press here the verdict it lasted for eight months, purely morally. it was very hard. it was very hard to see. first, one two victims sons were immediately killed even morally preparing for such a process is a task with an asterisk, there are 46 defendants. they have 60 defenders. this is a hall full of aggressive people preparing a court session as a special operation. this is the case when the process leaves a mark in the soul of the judge forever for the judge of justice. well, what the decision is expressed in, it should be clear to everyone, including the united issues of punishment. i believe that he is the most difficult without succumbing, of course, to emotions. here on this case. we have three convicts who were sentenced to

exceptional measures, only two of them were sentenced. he caught the soldier’s president, the third one didn’t apply at all, that is, one must assume that he understood that he deserved such a punishment. for 15 years, the bandits terrorized not only in belarus, but the cities of russia they were called. 2019 after 15 years of search. how much time has passed? whatever deeds people do, the process of justice is done and people received a cauldron, estates. yes, there lies, in principle, justice , the realization that punishment is inevitable for making echoes of the dashing nineties. and they will roll for a long time. according to the courts of the country, crime grew along with the workload. at the court, not everyone could withstand such a rate of staff turnover, it seemed. nothing to stop that i can compare, because i

was caught in the soviet period. activity, of course, 70. no period was somewhat simpler and quieter than the 30-year period of recent history. it's more complicated the most difficult everyone understood we need changes, new approaches, new laws and our own managed and compact system of justice. initially, the concept of judicial and legal reform, adopted in the ninety-second year. she had foreseen. well, such rather radical ways of reorganization. the very first attempts to implement it showed, then, that not all of the proposed innovations. they are acceptable to, uh, the legal traditions of our country. they will not be completely understood by our population. well, in some cases. it was about unjustified high costs. the main task was to understand and feel in time what we can get as a result of the reform. well, such, uh,

complex , cluttered, not very understandable for the population. find out, but outwardly a very democratic system of institutions, but which simply will not cope with its tasks, while the belarusian people and industry are being rebuilt in a new way. it was necessary not only to reform the economy, but to create conditions for its work. and this cannot be done without a fair and honest trial. thus the need arose the creation of a system of economic courts, which replaced the soviet arbitration reforms were brewing throughout the system , colossal changes took place, a completely new type of economy was set up, different from the soviet type. and all disputes had to be resolved in such a way as not to give rise to conflicts, but , on the contrary, to resolve them. that is why the economic, then economic block of justice has always been aimed primarily at conciliatory restorative justice, based on the whole labor collectives were divided

into two separate systems of one branch of the judiciary . this is something artificial, for example, having one legal field, and at the same time both the civil procedure code and the economic procedural courts , duplicated functions and often interpreted the same rules in different ways, the number of disputes in the economic sphere in the field of e-production has especially increased . this required analysis and development of the practice of applying the legislation. moreover, since there is one base, accordingly, there should be a single approach to unfortunately, not always in two judicial systems. these approaches coincided ; it was necessary to direct all this into a single channel. december 1997 is a historic event. the first congress of judges judges in the administration of justice independence and any interference of people's activities is inadmissible, and i, as the head of state and the guarantor of the constitution, will do everything to ensure that this constitutional provision

is rigorous. implemented by that time , for almost a year now, the supreme court had been headed by valentin tsukala, in fact, he happened to to create a national judicial system, as we see it now in this period. eh? a thirty-year period is hanging in history, it occupies a special place in the history of belarusian justice and the supreme court. it was the period of establishment of the young belarusian state, in principle, after the formation of the independence of the belarusian state. and, of course, it would be necessary to form not only state authorities in general, but also the judicial system. it was generally a difficult time. do you remember the nineties, but it was the complexity of the budget for signals on bringing reforms. well, then the task of the head of state was set to form a national judicial system and a national model of belarusian justice. at the first congress, the very collective mind worked, the judicial community chose a concept that became the belarusian

model of development, especially with the belarusian model. it consisted in the fact that we really could not break the basis of the device. we took the path of reducing the judicial burden. we began to shorten the judicial procedures, taking into account the negative attitude. neighbors needed not only to create their own, but also to learn how to work, in a new way laid the foundation for serious work on the codification of legislation, the judiciary and the status of courts. and most importantly , it began to take shape at the state level. well, the understanding is really of the role and place of the court, which should be inherent in a civilized right-wing state. judge's code of honor. i believe that none of its provisions has lost its relevance today . three stages of reform have been carried out over 30 years. and, for example, it was easy to compare them from history, it became this now we have everything. hmm, there is on the internet on paper, then we

looked forward to each ship's herald. we were waiting for the decision of the plenum. we all read those examples that are published on practical activities. you understand how sponges soaked up all the experience, comrades, for one judge in the ninety- seventh month there were more than 11 cases for comparison. and no more than 65 a high level of trust in the courts of society, the efficiency of justice, its quality in those years, all this was still ahead of the judicial procedure so reduced, that they are not comparable to what it was before, we managed to find this optimal , let’s say, middle ground between the quality of wasuya and the speed of you. for fifteen years, he headed the court, guarding the fundamental law, and in those years he served as deputy chairman of the supreme court. i remember what the justice system faced, notes the development of unified approaches to the application of new legislation, at that time new laws were adopted in the field of criminal law

, civil law, and legislative new principles for implementation were established. justice in criminal and civil cases , there was an objective need to review more than fifty resolutions of the plenum. to clarify the judicial practice , a systematic, purposeful work was carried out by the supreme court, which provided high-quality, prompt explanations on how the courts should apply the new legislation. there is a need to restore people's confidence in the courts and , in general, in justice, wasted by the collapse of the soviet union, a sociological study was conducted. the questionnaires checked the organization of the work of courts throughout the country and in the result was born a unique document in december 1999, a decision was adopted by the captive supreme court on the culture of judicial activity and the improvement of the organization of judicial

processes. this document is still a basic guideline for the courts. at that time, only the most problematic industry was affected after the collapse of the soviet economy . there were disputes over the rights to intellectual property in one large country. everything was common and one development. could benefit many republics after the parade of sovereignties, everyone became for himself, whoever stood up first, that and slippers, therefore, these soviet ones are trademarks . whoever first captured that one on its territory in his department and registered and received a certificate for the goods , in order to ensure the effective protection of intellectual property objects of belarus , had to create a virtually new judicial collegium and gather from scratch specialists who had little knowledge in law and jurisprudence. ideally, the college was supposed to be a fusion of lawyers with engineers and scientists,

and in different branches of science. this is a very labor tree complex case, requiring specialized technical knowledge. uh, higher education technically. naturally, scientific education. in the case that should be to start working only with the object. everything, this invention is a technical solution, a utility model, promo, samples of insidious signs. this is all a complex area, to thoroughly and subtly understand this subject. it is possible, of course, and not only technical education. it is clear that a judge who does not speak the same language as an expert who cannot confront him acute questions and cannot independently understand the technical documentation. they entirely depend on his opinion and on the opinions of the invited social specialists. this means that it cannot claim to be objective and independent. the solution needed a revolutionary process, a complete and innovative restructuring, so that the world-carrier of standards would still pull up the activities of this colleague and completely copy someone else's experience. we didn't want to. we have our own radiation. we have our own

approach credits, but at the same time germany is the most effective and most importantly, what has not been repeated is no more. in the union of the republic this is an obligation, and with us today it is an obligation that this value as a court of this collegium is only specialists. legal education and experience in judicial work, but also people with higher technical education, it was, of course, new, it was absolutely not typical for the republic of belarus, of course. it was difficult even to understand that it is precisely such specialists that are included in colleagues today, the second congress of judges states the judiciary as an independent branch of the state authorities. a fundamental historical conclusion was made on the word of the enormous work done by the courts to improve the quality and efficiency of justice , the establishment of the supremacy of the institution. protection of the wheeled system of carious rights and

free civil destinies. stability in society. being face to face. with the people , the justice system is always in sight. and even more so , the president has the initiative to create a unified justice system. it was about transformation, but without the revolution and radical breaks. we need to make the best decision on issues relevant and important for the state of society, improving the activities of our courts, we are not talking about a mechanical transfer of powers from one judicial body to another or thoughtless copying. the ideas of the neighbors startre form, gave a presidential decree and the fourteenth year became a year of change, of course, from the fourteenth year. uh, the period when to get an additional function took on a very high degree of responsibility, when he became essentially the head of the entire judicial system of the courts. general jurisdiction. actually

the separation of powers, executive and judicial, took place, when the ministry of justice , which previously was in charge of the organizational support of judicial activities, acquired an independent position, and the supreme court included, among other things , the functions of both staffing and organizational support of judicial activities. the general and economic courts were merged into a single system of courts of general jurisdiction, headed by the supreme court, which helped a lot in the work in subsequent years. after all, the belarusian economy, at least slowly, but confidently rose to her feet, and recovered from the painful rupture of soviet ties. most importantly, we received accusations. this is what we have enriched experience with the experience of both economic courts and society courts. and when two branches into one we are much stronger in everything, the development of the economy is inseparable. with the development of economic courts , new areas of industry are emerging in these years , the competencies of judges are growing

, belarus has become a space power. world, as a country of high technologies with powerful design centers, retail and clearly this one have received rapid development. the new world could not be imagined without economic disputes. our approaches, well, from the moment of the birth of the economic bloc right is different. outwardly, they have not changed, so it was in the economic block that my justice was much earlier. than the general courts were e, conciliation procedures were applied. simplified procedures of court proceedings are by and large weight higher than economic court. so became the colleagues association of the judiciary system, uh, and its direction from the supreme court one center. ensured the unity of judicial practice efficiency in the administration of justice improved the quality of justice more complete and fair resolution of those

disputes that appeared in the courts the system became more compact and manageable the reform made it possible to quickly see and eliminate problems. supreme court. i was able to decide on my own. how to distribute judges among courts throughout the country, dividing the load, the volume of justice has literally grown in a short time at least one and a half times. the history of the supreme court in people candidate of law honored jurist of belarus rima filipchik became a people's judge at the age of 30, then voted for judges and gained 98%. it started with the district court. gained vast experience, being a judge here in the constitutional, then the supreme speaks of all categories of cases, perhaps the most difficult civil. wherever you are. you still think about the case that you considered and about the one that you have to consider. and why exactly said so? this witness, you evaluate not

only his words, but also his actions, his view, his attitude to the issue, which later helps to evaluate the truth. he spoke or untruth in civil cases and the evidence is presented by the parties and this is the difficulty in assessing this evidence, the most difficult cases are housing. you are cases of compensation for harm to protect the honor and dignity of a judge who considers this category of cases, and also psychologists. we have, uh, a settlement agreement, conciliation, pre-trial mediation. reconciliation, and it seems to me that this task of the court should be resolved if the parties reach some kind of agreement before the court order is reached. it will be wonderful and the court session will give two parties satisfied. and what

else do we need sleepless nights before the hearings, and before this long preparation for the study of the material, only the judge knows what he has to go through to make the only decision in the process of civil cases. not all present a certain complexity. at least in terms of what the referee should miss. this life is another collegium of some kind through yourself and you will be able to look through your eyes, uh, and one side and the other side, and so on , only make informed decisions. lord, from the spirit of this law. this is a big responsibility, because sometimes the fate of a person is even decided. the category of a peculiar measure of the relationship between people of the problem of justice would never have arisen only under one condition, if the state, that is, the legislator lasts the state, could provide for all life situations, a clear algorithm of actions and appropriate sanctions in case of their

violation, but it is impossible that life is so diverse and multifaceted that all these nuances are legislators. just never able to describe the revelation of these shades of some nuances. perhaps this is the task of justice in order to accept in a civil case. the only correct and only possible solution. every judge. there is a case that cost him great mental loss. alexander fedortsov has this. this is a terrorist attack on the tyumen metro. october explosion on the second path i'm at the bottom of some information has passed 11 years. unfortunately, they remain bitter, and today no one could have imagined that such a case could happen in calm, tolerant belarus, while conducting

a trial, it was necessary to keep from emotions, it was possible not to escalate the situation, at the same time , to let people objectively understand to feel what it is not should be. a lot of victims, crippled people, their fate is the cynicism of the crime, which belarus was not ready for. case in more than 500 volumes. in more than 400 victims and relatives were in open court as a result of the terrorist attack in the metro alone, 15 people died, 32 people received serious bodily injuries, but hundreds of other people suffered bodily injuries of a different severity, not to mention material harm, which was the reason most of all found the people . it’s just that the soul is torn

to pieces, they need to be punished to find and punish for belarus and the entire power bloc the disclosure of this crime. it was also a matter of honor, the highest level of operational work, the investigation collected a complete evidence base and considered such a voluminous case as soon as possible. a certain circle of people, including certain mass media, uh, who hmm wanted to somewhat discredit the authorities of the state, discredit the investigation, were participants in the trial, including one of the victims, who succumbed to these approaches, which, well, let's say to a certain extent collaborated with those people who did various stuffing. and even he, at the end of the trial, when he was urged to come forward and say

something negative. he refused to do this, it should be recognized that one of the accused pleaded guilty and did not even apply for pardon, realizing that their guilt in that is a terrible tragedy was objectively proven, the judge is guided only by the law in his assessments. we look at the conviction, and the personal conviction of the judge. this is what this subjective personal statement is. judges must necessarily rely on a comprehensive, objective examination of all the circumstances of the case in their entirety. now, if such a conviction is formed on the basis of these requirements, if you have fulfilled everything that you are supposed to do in the course of justice, then you have the right to a personal movement. and after all, it was not only the explosion of the subway, but also incidents on the cold during mass events, the evidence found in other episodes, our society does not know, uh, many details that konovalov already

found in his workbook, uh, the formula matured by reading substances for a lot stronger than the substance that was blown up in the subway that's left to the general public behind the scenes that only experts know and at that time it was necessary. to take measures to prevent further 3-month attempts of destructive forces on the mountain of belarusians, to shake the situation in the country did not remove at that time no one could have imagined that in the twentieth year they would face advanced extremism, when the war of the hybrid leading position would be assigned to information and psychological attacks , terrorist attacks. the twentieth year of testing the strength of every citizen and the entire state system, the supreme court does not

the exception during the period of all these events that took place, including the courts , had a rather serious impact on the part of individual destructive-minded citizens and organizations. it's hard to count these threats, uh, the number of our judges who would not get hit. i would say that it would turn out so that, in fact, well, all members of the judicial chambers in criminal cases and administrative cases, and they all received it to one degree or another. i'll quote the criticism so neatly. yes, this is all negative. environment in which our judges worked. she did not in any way affect the professional performance of her duties, remained faithful to the motherland and make people worthy to bear the title of judge judge, especially in a rightful democratic state. more uh in modern conditions, when we live, well, in the information society, i have to,

uh, very clearly imagine the arbiter of justice. what happens at the same time in the country outside the windows of his office is another matter that public opinion may be different, there may be two or three opinions at once, exercising the powers of a judge, the judge must, well, have the civil and personal courage to ignore public opinion, if the laws force him to act in a certain way, otherwise uh, we can replace, in general, legality not only in justice, but throughout the country. here are such arguments . e about good or bad about what society wants, an attempt close to the judiciary coincided even with the period of the pandemic conditions. the judges were not easy , they were hardened by the attempts of extremists to violate their boundaries of personal epidemic only

pushed to a more active vision of the latest technologies, jurisprudence provides legislators with grain for reflection. the supreme court conducts analytical activities, the initiative put forward is working to improve legislation. and as a consequence of improving the quality of justice legislation. the theme is interesting because it is not static, it develops. uh, according to the timing. yes, time itself dictates certain norms that must be fulfilled. it showed up clearly. especially lately. we are seriously involved in the process of reforming our domestic legislation. this was due , among other things, to the judicial reform, which began back in the 1990s, and which we have been actively implementing and are currently implementing the independence of the judiciary. emphasized the updated constitution. of course, he established the status of the supreme court, as the highest body heading the system of courts of general jurisdiction, the role and

importance of the supreme court has increased significantly in the system of state power, and the principle of separation has found further development. authorities. the principles of the administration of justice are fundamentally important this is the first time in history, by the way, that we are proud of it. the fact is that today the supreme court has received such a high status of 157 courts, almost 5,000 working, and we need to make sure that everything is very sufficient every day, all types of ensuring the conduct of our courts receive about 4,000. solution. it consolidated the position that was adopted during the years of judicial and legal reform, and the judges of the supreme court themselves received a higher constitutional status , taking into account the changes that are supported society, the cadre of judges of the highest judicial instances will be formed through elections, the entire belarusian people's assembly

of representatives of the people is ensured, thereby the independence of the judiciary. this is a very important way to democratize the state. this is one of the elements of people's democracy, when, uh, the courts above the judicial instances will be formed by the people themselves. here it is a symbol of national justice, it is no coincidence that next to the palace of independence , the main symbol of the country's sovereignty, we are entering a new modern building with you the spacious hall of the supreme court of the republic of belarus, striking with its splendor every incoming themis meets national belarusian motives, where the details are filled with meaning for the servants of themis this house, where everything is harmoniously functional, and most importantly works for a common goal, high-quality and prompt administration of justice of a judicial colleague is located under one roof

we are located in one of the courtrooms of the supreme court of the republic of belarus which are equipped for the consideration of criminal cases at first instance, and in order appeals. and this technology stepped forward, full audio and video recording. everything that happens in the courtroom from the workplace of the secretary of the court session, it is possible to manage and multimedia systems , view video materials and evidence , and participate in court sessions. well, through remote access, but those participants in the process who are in the building here. eh, the arrival can not all be tied into a single computer network already on a multimedia screen. they just took pictures from several rooms of the supreme court at once such is, er, the exchange of video information in real time. we actively use it

for litigation as well. it's required somewhere. and of course, to implement effective management of the organization of the system, digitalization and technology. this is the challenge of today's digitalization of the socialization economy. public life is attracted by digitalization, of course, here is the work on the creation and use of databases the use of banks of judicial documents and decisions remote participation in court sessions. well, if you look even further, then, probably , the possibility of using elements of artificial intelligence in judicial activities. well, now one of the symbols of our informatization is the main server room of the supreme court. for

years, the activity of the judicial system will be more technological, this is the request of the time, this is the request of society today, but this justice will not become less fair, less reasonable, but less balanced. and most importantly, after all. only a person, and this judge can, delve into indeed , in the heart of the 110-seat plenum building, when the building was put into operation for the first time , it was an unexpected emotion for us to solve the problem that exists and humanly resolve it. they simply overflowed from beauty from severity from consistency of colors, of course, to everyone. we really liked that there were elements of the sulph belts. this is our history.

the coats of arms of our cities are very well interspersed in the whole composition. the room is in the form of an oval without sharp corners on the walls the state emblem and the coats of arms of all regions and minsk blue colors our cornflowers the golden colors of our stained-glass fields. we got such a name - this is our sky belarusian beautiful blue light. here, materials on the communication of judicial practice, statistics, and captivity give explanations to general courts, which is especially important given the dynamically changing legislation. the decision of the captive supreme court is a kind of guideline and tool for making lawful, justified and fair decisions ; they are aimed at a common understanding. the application of the law is that which concerns the ideality of the decision to captivity. we must always meet some criteria that relate to recovery. this legitimacy is a clarification of their validity.

their certainty, their general obligation for all courts; office rooms of the judge are small, but functional; there is nothing extra space here; it is planned so that specialists from different judicial chambers for criminal civil economic cases ; a collegium for intellectual property cases are located on different floors ; there is a room for lawyers in prosecutors at the halls court hearings and premises for witnesses , the assembly hall for 374 seats, its technical equipment is also at a decent level. it is possible to hold various kinds of events here, including using remote access to the purpose of this hall. it can be as wide as possible, from scientific and practical conferences to holding various kinds of working events, of course, but 100 years ago the history of belarusian justice. the judges of the supreme court were distinguished by a scrupulous

approach to the consideration of all cases unconditionally. hey, here's the image. yes, fair justice, who are preserved and are still changing values ​​today. in the community. today , the criteria for decency in assessing people are changing, and we must not miss out on these changes. the main essence of man do not miss human relations and how the state goes hmm on the way to alignment. societies with high moral values , and the judicial system should go on, sticking out these values ​​that encourage them, and at the same time, punishing the negative tendencies of negative approaches with a conscious decision, and not childhood dream. as they say, sometimes accomplished professionals. i imagine that

i should be a judge, it seemed to me that the judge was the one and the lawyer that we were independently making decisions. and this is very, very. it seems to me that it was such an incentive for me to choose this regret. i don't regret it. no, i don't. i believe it's that way of life. i think maybe even the state machines swear each one's own in an oath, judge. there are such words that the judge must be impartial and fair, this one, let's say the standard in which he must strive for every judge. with us, punishment and responsibility is individual, so we do not have absolutely identical cases, despite their apparent identity. yes, every case has its own nuances. they say that there are no former judges, and among the judges the experience gained while working in the supreme court helps to solve the most difficult tasks later in life, as well as in parliamentarians. svetlana lyubetskaya of her biography , work with an idea occupies a special place, a wide

knowledge of the laws of their application. platform for legislative activity now, when the tasks of reconciliation and law and justice and finding the most correct and correct solutions are the request of the state of society and an individual person. this is the task that the legislator faces, and the second component is the assessment of the regulatory impact, how these norms will be applied in the end, of course, judicial activity is an indicator of the perfection of legislation. i am now retired and i am very worried. what are the statistics? how are cases handled? i am very worried, when my colleagues make mistakes. it seems to me that there are former judgments. it is exactly internal culture and external culture. yes , perhaps very much from and that valuable and important thing that judicial activity has given, this is, first of all, but

the formation of character. ah, habits the ability to make decisions. it would seem that in the most unpredictable of them, standard situations of knowledge and human psychology are knowledge of the procedure for resolving certain legal issues in a complex. this is a very good experience that helps in life, not only in professional activities, of course, memories are the best because those people who are related to justice are those who directly resolve legal disputes. these are people who, uh, have high theoretical knowledge and practical skills. these are people who have a very clear, uh, position in life, and a universal sense of justice, and the peculiarity of this work is that you need to learn all your life, the main thing for a judge. to be a patriot of one's country to defend

the constitutional value and by the force of law honorably and responsibly to execute judicial houses. the head of state must be fair decision. fairly it means, first of all, legally justified and fair in relation to this particular situation. jewish work. it's still a solo job. you are always alone with the decision. you can get acquainted with the experience with legal positions to study wearing approaches. you will always accept yourself and i have the deepest respect for those who today work in such a very important area of ​​​​legal protection, and they are capable, and make a balanced, reasonable, legal and

fair decision, and for me this is the life of a judge, as a rule, people are not public, and for zhanna shkurdyuk. it was one of the few interviews or preparations for her pre- trial process that was really exciting. great. our makes us the judge's chair consideration quietly calmly without unnecessary words without emotion. here, even it is closer and easier to us behind a hundred-year history, but new horizons are ahead to make the system modern, efficient, economical with a high level of public trust, an unchanging task for the supreme court. the first is efficiency. the speed of the court - it's care - it's some kind of superfluous outdated judicial procedures. this, perhaps even you know, is the one window that many people talk about and dream about, when each dispute is considered in one court date. if we talk about the quality of justice, that is, of course, uh

, first of all, it is connected with the stability of legislation with an increase in the quality of both legal education and the quality of the judiciary, and finally, the third task is to make it equal for everyone in the morning, so that people accepted our judgment. how do you know, this is the body where you can go for protection? and they went to court for advice with explanations, they calculated that yes. this is x, this is the court that will pronounce, protect, help restore the violated right, and make such a modern judicial system. i really think this is my personal dream as a professor.

they are just starting their journey, however, they already have many victories and overcomings in the lens of television cameras, young talents, laureates of republican and international competitions. this is not a success story, but a story about that in fact it is preceded by a new generation of belarusians in the new people project. the premiere on belarus 24 tv channel

is a live panorama of the main events of friday, april 14, i will tell you sergey lugovsky hello legality, order and protection of the interests of citizens on the eve of the centennial anniversary of the supreme court, the president held