and very often our opponents are late. they filmed for this two two and a half years. they wrote about these events. a lot of false material is real, and we are always waiting for something. we are eyewitnesses, then this story. all the same, they will interpret one way or another with or without us. well, in fact, this is the first reason. yes, in order to talk about this topic already , starting from what was written from the documentary, in fact, the approach. yes, the eyewitness that was present in it. that is why i really hope that this will become. well a reason for in order to find a competent screenwriter and who would simply film these things. well , at least he wrote the script in such a way that he wanted to make such a film. well, that's the first impression. moreover, there is something to talk about. here we go straight from physical education.

you during the detention to almost a hint that one of the representatives of the female trio was one of these candidates, not just employees, well, in your book, in principle, it is full of provocative details and it should be taken as a whole is not pulled out of context, because every opponent of power is a supporter of power, he will find something for himself there to cling to, yes, and what to push off from, have you already received your portion of negativity, as an author , or vice versa a compliment from contemporaries? i'm already starting to get mmm quite active feedback. and, of course, there are both exclusively complementary reviews and extremely negative ones, and you, marat sergeevich , very correctly said that this product, written by a direct participant

eyewitnesses of the events. it should be considered precisely as a holistic product, because if you wish, you can pull quotes there, and these quotes are already pulling separate extremist portals, both in favor of one version and in favor of another, so a holistic picture is very important. as a result of reading this book, and there there are no options anymore, if at the initial stage, uh, i spoke out. uh, my assumptions are doubts about work, let’s say representatives of the e-law enforcement agencies at that period yes, and then at the end , it certainly becomes clear to me and the reader that sometimes it is better to use, let's say, unpopular methods to save the country from disaster, but

it does not mean that my opinion expressed in the book is some kind of axiom. no. that's absolutely right. they say that those who saw in the writing of this book a desire to cause a public discussion to summarize the available plast of information to present their vision to the world in order not to follow them. i mean those. who writes for us now the history of our former compatriots. uh, sometimes even talented, and compatriots so that we write history so that we show our approach, and this is how you know, as in ont films, the last one is exclusively based not on slogans. give people the facts, people will sort things out on their own. but this is our main approach, in principle, such an approach in order to provide food for analysis. people are already taking it on their own

, the average, belarus, he will always sort everything out, and we see, this is already. i understand that you are quite modest and are now so a little bit in these cramped circumstances. well, after all, did all friends remain friends, and did all enemies remain enemies, after how they read this book, or at least got it in their hands, and flipped through it for a start, because it needs to be read. you know, i even bought it. it seems to me friends, because i made enemies, especially among those who do not like some conclusions, and in a number of cases, especially those related to political irresponsibility, representatives of all the people who called themselves. positions uh, the conclusions are obvious, after all, uh, from the point of view of people who are professionally involved in politics with political technologies. we could

to assume such a reaction of the authorities to an attempted coup, we will definitely call a spade a spade, but they, after all, could have guessed. e that as a result of this reaction it will be very painful. i'm talking about the pain and the inconvenience that people are now experiencing who believed in the supporters of change. and, knowing that these irresponsible, vile, insignificant and miserable leaders of ours would be hurt , they did nothing, absolutely nothing, to protect their supporters, and then, when i ran into them in more hmm closer. let's say delicate circumstances and helped some of them to go free. i saw that hmm my assumptions about the moral

insignificance of these characters. unfortunately, they justified themselves. why did this book appear right now? why now why not a year ago? why not in a year? emotions are gone. almost three years have already passed without 4 months almost 3 years. since those events, emotions have gone away and, therefore, it has become possible to assess the situation objectively from the outside. well, of course, and one of the main factors. this is what many events started be forgotten. and given the uniqueness of those historical moments in which i was lucky to participate. i realized that they would simply be forgotten. look, for me personally, the fact that tikhanovsky’s comrade-in-arms, who brought her

to lithuania in the twentieth year, is now working as a plumber as a plumber, turned out to be very revealing. now, if this is how you treat the person who helped you, what could be expected by the rest of the belarusian. what are your most curious or so favorite insiders from this book? yes, for different audiences. well, here's an example his name is oleg moiseev, a plumber, who drove tikhanovskaya, hid tikhanovskaya, drove children, tikhanovskaya, he is the most obvious, you know, when oleg moiseev had already left belarus for lithuania and he turned to this very tikhanovskaya for help. she didn’t even accept him, and of course, this revolts any person. and we all also saw

how oleg drove it all over the country in his car, and what kind of shameless person do you have to be in order not to share it in difficult times? uh, at least some of the happiness of their insane income. this example is very important because you know one of my favorite proverbs. it is the power of small things that there are many of them. here is already further can be about than not to talk. do not read any of their programs, by the way, by the way, they still do not exist, and never have been and never will be. uh, just take human qualities simply and you know these examples and this and the plumber oleg moiseev, this and other cases related to the release of individual activists, that is, prisons. this is for them specific facts related to the course of the election campaign, when

let's say those activists of the baryka team who got the most signatures did not even deserve a phone call with gratitude. that is, this is black ingratitude irresponsibility. it was traced throughout the entire election campaign from the side of the leader of the position from the side of the new position, as they called themselves , and this should shock any person, because here we are talking about dishonesty and extremism. if you have noticed the resources that pulled out some of my quotes. yeah, they kept silent about these blatant and obvious examples. although it would seem to take it and say that the author is lying talk to the participants in those events, but they cannot say anything, because everything is pure, true. we also talked to you behind the scenes. yes and now, if

there would be a fact, checking, for individual events, about which we can simply talk, but not on the air. yes, it would be even more interesting, unfortunately, it does not always come to mind, it is necessary. is it possible to technically confirm this, okay? you consider the pandemic to be one of the triggers for the coup attempt. the question is hypothetical, but if only, if only the pandemic happened a little earlier and the belarusians and the whole world would have seen that our president was right. that he did not allow panic and the lockdown did not collapse the economy , as many people demanded, so in your opinion , when everyone saw that the path chosen by belarus, it turned out to be correct, but this happened much later. this could at that time reduce the degree at the selection stage. from my point of view, uh, covid,

the degree played a major role, as for degrees, probably the degree would not have decreased, because all presidential elections were accompanied by activation of our fifth column and some protests. well, this is standard, it would always be the same degree, but the scale of people's involvement would definitely be less for the first time in history. and we have to admit that these marginal political forces or marginalizations, as they are called by zenon pozdnyak, they went beyond the limits of the opposition getta for the first time. well, i agree, which means that his large number of people on the street, of course, is not so large. as they called uh, us uh, extremist resources from and to yes, yes 200-300.000 president. eh, so i took a picture, on which everyone is counted literally on the heads there 40,000, but even these 40. this is

much more than in all previous years precisely because of envy. why? because social tension. she had to get out. it should have spilled out and it so coincided that at that moment the electoral campaign was taking place, so i am sure that if the covid had been later or much earlier, and then we would have been convinced that the political decisions of president lukashenka were really right, he would massively disobedience to belarus would not exist, we would not have caught it, but of course, other factors have also been added to the mind, which i list this and the activities of the sleeping ones, this and, uh, it means that new political faces that seemed to be represented by the authorities were in power, for example, the same cicala, right? and, of course, our work. more precisely, the defect of individual services of departmental organizations. they were responsible

for making sure this didn't happen. i can't shut up and it's not in my principles, er, to say that black is white or vice versa. i say, as it was exactly at that moment, especially this section, especially this one error section. yes, where it got a lot not only ideologists, but also a number of departments. yes , you should at least read it, because i absolutely agree that sometimes we have discussed this before. believe me, until the twentieth year, when management decisions are made at the level of departments that are not very competent, provoking entire layers or categories. these are mistakes from which it is necessary to draw the right conclusions. well, look, you criticize you offer. yes, but sometimes you suggest and do it. here are the conclusions to be drawn. well though would be idiologists, but the authorities of the society or have already done now before a new choice we have two

companies ahead of an extremely responsible. i am sure that if conclusions are drawn. or maybe not 100%. maybe in some other percentage, but what they are made of is obvious , we see it in the use of new media , active use in the information agenda on the use of bloggers, authorial journalism, of course, some, after reading the first chapters devoted to ideological work including representatives ideological services to think about, but you and i understand that working as an ideologist. it is very important and very difficult. and we really appreciate this work, because it is work directly with people. but then in the twentieth year there were certain shortcomings. i would even say significant now, when you talk and travel around belarus, like with that

lenin and his log on the subbotnik, yeah , which, in my opinion, a total of about 100 people, was not demolished in the end, well, according to them, well, everyone attributed yourself now. i hear that all the deputies were on the streets senators, all heads of executive committees, all heads of ideological departments then in the twentieth year, but this is not so. i personally saw only a few, and so, if it really were so, then august would be the twentieth year. it's not like he didn't repeat himself. it would uh go. hmm, with a slightly different sauce, it would go, uh, more gently. we would have overcome this period without such unpleasant consequences for all affected electoral campaigns, therefore, of course, no one can be offended here. we repeat, we respect and appreciate the work of each sovereign

people, but conclusions must be drawn, they are already drawing and this main conclusion cannot be left on the sidelines ; bismarck the iron chancellor was at one time the representative of germany at the tsar's court in st. petersburg, and in 1859, together with the retinue of alexander i, he went for a walk. the weather was just as wonderful as it is now, and he went for a walk with emperor alexander iii in the summer garden, and there they saw on the lawn is a sentry and bismarck witnessed such a conversation that alexander iii says. why are you standing

in the middle of the lawn. there is nothing here. you are guarding, that in general the grass or that they started to sort it out, send the commandant the commandant also does not know raised a very elderly elderly guard and he remembered how his father told him how he was put. here in this very outfit, it turns out 100 years ago in the same place, empress catherine ii walked and a snowdrop grew there and so that it would not be plucked. she ordered a sentry to be posted, and now since then the snowdrop is gone. but catherine forgot and a man went to work for 100 years and stood guarding an already empty place. everyone was waiting for the command, as in this case, the emperors. so here is the main conclusion. you don't have to wait for a command, you don't have to be afraid to take responsibility . well, what are you talking about, the president constantly says, if everyone is in their place doing their job, we will have

much less problems, but look, you have served time in prison. became famous. well, it's true, despite the fact that they were once the first secretary of the central committee of the smb, yes. wrote a book simple, but very interesting destiny. and why , at the same time, could not voskresensky's case become widespread? well, after all, a really good case for anyone who ran, if expanded like that. probably because 99%, uh people are a follower. there are very few leading people, plus at a certain historical moment political experience is very necessary. flair intuition strategic vision of the situation, and this is not given to everyone, and often it is given from birth. plus, of course, taking into account the fact that i was the first who

turned to the belarusians with a request to take head to that part of the belarusians who celebrated the feast of disobedience. i faced a fierce reaction with persecution with hatred, probably, like you, marat sergeevich, all state-owned journalists who then took the path of saving the preservation of the country and manageability in the country, of course, it was not easy to survive and survive and survive and those who watched from the outside , they decided not to repeat this case. although then then. i needed their help, and together we could localize the situation, and it would not have grown to international sanctions yes, constant tension, which we do not need, but nevertheless it happens, because it is necessary to maintain

controllability in the country, but no one stood by, including because of cowardice. here is the totality of all factors led to the fact that the repetition of this case. no, not because they think it's wrong. there is no quiet in conversations. they all agree with me and now they are writing from abroad, how right you were, but publicly your knees trembled to stand next to the president, but i did not tremble. that is the question. to the message voiced a very interesting proposal of the state. yes, change the checkpoint. yes , for some reason, i still remember those times when martynova wanted to exchange you. yes,

there is a book about it. well, let's go to the source. yes, the president's reaction was very interesting. yes, it has become an informational hit, but if your initiative has a real future. what do you think? president lukashenka raised the stakes at that moment. he offered to exchange honors for a piece of latin with his grief-stricken team. and thus he drove the polish ruling circles into zutzwank a matte situation a stalemate because you were offered a polish citizen. and how much is this man with a polish passport in exchange for some representatives of the marginalized public, some of which for a quarter of a century, uh, was fed from the hands of the president? i mean lettuce. and, of course, the polish public thought,

and it will put pressure on polish politicians. and uh lukashenka brilliantly planted them. hey, very interesting case. i will say more next monday. i have been invited to the polish embassy and we will discuss this situation, therefore, in place of e, an ironic lettuce. i would think and think very seriously, but really. here is the proposal, it was m-m on the one hand sounded. perhaps jokingly, but on the other hand, all the president's words have a sacred meaning and character. he offered absolutely concrete. well, if not a roadmap, but the first step towards this roadmap, which can normalize belarusian-polish relations. if they don’t want to give out a latte, they can give out

psykhanovskaya, or they can give out prokopiev discuss options, they can stop dispersing all these supposedly patriotic camps where militants train. this can also be a bargain, but the ball is on their side. in fact, the proposal is very specific and in the coming week. we will discuss it already in the subject plane. well you heard a beam, only a beam of value, their stock has fallen too. i really like that you tomorrow on the fly of poland quite deeply adequately. yes, and this is important lately, all the news that we receive from them. they wear this enough, the threatening nature of the annihilation of refugees is the buildup of military capabilities near our borders. including the statements of politicians about the deployment of nuclear weapons and doubling the army. and this is only part of the news. yes, you yourself have visited poland more than once, you already have constructive positions, as

we like to say, well, you haven’t lived there, there are really no adequate politicians left who could, well, publicly indicate that relations with belarus are important. this is important both for poland and for the poles, including, they themselves are now suffering, but under what conditions then it is possible when we can return normal neighborly relations. this question is very complicated, it interests me very much primarily from an economic point of view, because in addition to being a political scientist, i am also an entrepreneur in the past. and, of course, i see that mm belarusian-polish economic relations. they have enormous growth potential. here we have the shortest logistical shoulder for all of ours at the forefront, yes,

and at the same time, i understand that the economy is still the primary base determines us the superstructure do you remember the soviet union with twenty-seven, in my opinion, yes, millions of members of the cpsu at the time of the ninetieth year 29 million, practically and uh, an infinite number of millions of special services and ideologists. and what happened as a result of the economy is always primary, therefore, of course, it is in our national interests and in the interests of national poland to stop. this is a confrontation, but the question is that the entire polish elite has been nurtured by these funds, as they themselves call it. sometimes yes about it too mentioned in the book and we have an option between the bad ones. this is the party of law and justice of the three-headed hydra of dudymorovets kachinsky and e, the civil party, the platform of tusk and sikorsky, that is, bad and very bad and

very bad, i will remind the sikorsky ones. this is the citizen who rejoiced at the explosion at the nord stream in public, however, then he removed his appearance and changed bad. yes. uh, there are decent people associated with ld to vosnevsky, but they are now marginalized. of course, i'll be honest. i even wanted to address the president with a request, taking into account all my communication potential and knowledge of the polish political market. appoint me ambassador of belarus to poland. i thought i could sort it out and get out of, uh, this spiral of confrontation. but now i see that the regime of the duda of marovets kaczynski is still playing to aggravate and, of course, this is due to the actions of their overseas partners, so answering your question, when relations between poland and

belarus normalize, i will say when relations between russia and the united states normalize here when the big ones agree all the rest stop, european, the parties will finally fulfill and realize their national interests. just be careful, because the fact of being an ambassador in poland sometimes has a bad effect on the biography in itself. well, and so. well, you think, lettuce, in my opinion, is nowhere worse. i hope not, but still, when you go to the polish embassy, ​​ask a question. why did they deprive you of your freshly received in the twenty-second year, and two-year schengen, after all, for what and who dared so much? they told me through their channels. i checked from three sources. why me? recognized as a threat to the national security not

only of poland but of the entire european union. having issued the relevant document to me at the border, they were even prepared legally , they could not show me anything, because they allegedly do not persecute dissent, so they presented me with suspicions that i was a threat to national security. and when, according to their legislation , such a suspicion is presented, you can go for years to prove that you are not a camel, by the way, i succumbed to the corresponding lawsuit in a polish court and i am waiting. i really look forward to its consideration, but for some reason the case has been postponed for the fourth time . this decision was made by the polish government, despite the fact that i, probably, one of the few who call for the normalization of polish-belarusian relations, took on the denunciation of pavel latushki. i speak badly, it seems i wrote, a corresponding denunciation was sent to

the office of marovetsky and with the office of arovetsky an order came to the department for foreigners. uh, turn me on. here in their list of sanctions is absolutely vilely illegal. uh, but uh, i'm not surprised, to be honest, yuri the fact is that now, if now the exchange for y for how much would take place, it would be such a very interesting irony of fate. i cannot but ask one question in belarus , the belaya rus party appeared. the political field, in principle, began to stir, but they began to think about re-registration and deal with this issue, it is obvious that the sofas will disappear well. if there are two or three here on this background. i hear less and less ksds, and i hear and see yuri voskresensky, but ksds no why and isn't the time better now for political ones? the point is that the csd is round

table of democratic forces, it was originally created as a factory of thoughts, as an analytical center, as a kind of political incubator, on which certain political organizations of the structure can ripen, they are now ripening within the framework of the organizing committees, but of course, they are far from such pillars as romanov's belaya rus kpb. falcon ldpb haidukevich. the time has not yet come, they have not matured yet as for the analytical structure itself, of course, it works, but you already know on this, hmm, it’s not quite visible to society, not quite on a public level, it works with works with foreign embassies on a proposal to lift sanctions from belarusian enterprises. yes, it does not work yet, but we sow.

these are the seeds of doubt among our western partners, so the political organization is not yet mature and it may not exist, to be honest, if you take me, i don’t want to trust people i don’t know, and this is almost 3 years behind. i encountered the fact that many people came to the cd to solve their personal issues, minor issues to cover up. e, means from the side of e law enforcement organs. they thought that this would somehow help to defend themselves, that is, they tried to use our organization for selfish purposes, this is unacceptable, and i realized that if we create a party, we will fall back on the same rake, but you don’t want to step on the rake if it art has not matured in a natural way. stvenno nothing should and

will not ripen. and let's, then let's talk about these people in partially yes. so very parallels can be easily drawn, it is connected with your other mission, to guard the guys, you need a catapult in the rye. very beautiful allegory healed. yes and a very important mission. your mission. that's to prevent belarusians from getting into a batch in other people's games. well, this is for the future. there are those who have already been caught, but you can still return the president spoke about this, and you yourself are one of those. now, if the road ran back. and as you see this road, the road will master the road, the one who walks and the road is always there, and we are especially considering our slavic mentality and taking into account the fact that we are the winners ready to accept them, but

the one who sincerely repents, and writes a statement not like that, and in this time he has all phone is full of extremist telegram channels. or he says one thing here, but completely different to his relatives or friends. well, of course, this road will not accept such people on this road. he look. you yourself are in the commission, you are a member of the commission, several dozen applications have already been received by the commission, as it was announced, here are the criteria you will personally be guided by. you've already been burned. you already entrust. there zashklyarova, yes, for some other media people. by the way, can you tell us how they thanked you? criteria in commission should be one law, if then

still some 2 years ago 3 years ago two and a half. to be more precise, if then 2 1/2 years ago there could have been some concessions, including in order to restore public order, now the criterion should be exclusively one law. and here is the advantage of the commissions, that not someone somewhere in the corners rubs off and looks for acquaintances with members of the commission. no, there is a procedure. there is an algorithm. there is a legal status for everything. therefore, we will act exclusively according to the law and within the law. everybody there this is said and look at the severity of the offense committed. of course, if a person just left, then he has nothing to fear, but the question is what? what came out of this? everyone says that he went out like that, and often denunciations are also hidden with a request to impose sanctions and participate in various

extremist plans, which means writing in chat bots. literally even the neighbors. oh well, that's all, and we just went through, so we need to check in detail. now for the second question. this is my pain. these are all guarantees, and i, with my help, of course, so the consent of the investigating authorities and the approval of the head of state came out 32 people. uh-huh so in a number of cases, they inflicted such pain on me, which i experienced for a very long time and simply did not believe that there could be such human meanness, arrogance and cynicism. i will give a few examples, they are especially interesting. e the fact that some famous people decided to become my path. i read that the deputy is voronetsky. uh

analyst at herman and uh, entrepreneur leader of the union of entrepreneurs of one of the unions. e. shvets decided to vouch for journalists of one of the fast-moving publications , how did it end? you and i know the audience will also now recognize these journalists who fled and according to the law under the current law, the guarantor is liable for 500 basic units, therefore each of these citizens. deputy analyst and businessman received 18.5 thousand fines. when i read this, i crossed myself. i think, lord, glory to god and never again, so textbook examples are four people infamous four, as i designated them in the book with a hint of one from the headlines, tarantino it's a lawyer.

vlasova is a lawyer soli jr. is a political scientist shklyarov and this and vinchik animator krivko there you can read how they did with me with the country with everyone who believed them . the bowler hat we called him among ourselves , given that he always wore strange headdresses . i didn't just get a man out of jail. i also found money a lot of money colossal money to pay for it, damage to the state. so he still hasn't even returned some of that money. and at the same time, now, like everyone else

, he fled to poland, but uh, what can we talk about here? how many people do we now know with you, who are even for us, third-party people who can vouch for us and bear financial responsibility, probably a few of those who no one knows us, but now, having vouched for a complete stranger, providing deposit about the investigating committee. i was faced with the fact that i still have to perform part of it obligations, therefore, these are all stories with guarantees. from a tearful petition from the investigating authorities and the president to believe these people. eh, i personally got tired of them. i have reached my limit. if anyone wants, here is the voronetsky deputy, the pussy repeats, but, in my opinion, they burned themselves on

the first two entrusted. i don’t want to get burned anymore, i already choked, to be honest, when i read that you wanted to vouch for tikhanovsky from the very beginning, you have now changed your mind. if you paid attention, president lukashenko said at the last event that i i remember that report. and then i really suggested releasing psikhanovsky after seeing, uh, his human qualities, uh, and uh, deport or deport to lithuania. i perfectly understood that he would bring such a rustle there. for these resources, i perfectly understood that his wife, who would be invited by all countries and fail the heads of state, but she will have to go with him. this means that the meetings will all be spoiled, so then i suggested, from the point of view

of political technologies, you know, such creativity, which yes, as in quarter 95, after all they are an interesting comparison professionally working in the media field and have virtually monopolized influence over the minds of ukrainians. very professional 500.000 people. it's a pity. and so professional. yes, and that's not all. yes, so in terms of creativity here. this would be a very effective solution from my point of view. he would have messed up the cards, but that's out of the question now. let the investigation decide. how to relate to this or that convicted investigation and the president, or another difficult, but older topical topic is not i can’t ask you, we all remember how the fugitive inmates are also tikhonov’s. yes, they did revealing materials, tours around the country, yes. the main tour was always criticism of the state, criticism of the authorities, exposure

of local officials and deputies and the police , such a fertile eternal niche, which was constantly accompanied by insults. today we see that this niche. unfortunately , some bloggers with red-green avatars are starting to take over. they not only criticize, but also directly insult the highest officials, ministers, officials of various level. as well as journalists and everyone who does not agree with their opinion, simply, that is, as soon as you express a different opinion. the safe begins like this. here. i will ask a simple question, why are we stepping on the same rake and why, and what should be the reaction , taking into account the fact that you don’t want to step on the old rake. from my point of view , he is dangerous from the side. because today

they begin to persecute for the expressed point of view or begin to aggressively comment on it, forgetting that the world is not a black and white world - it is a kaleidoscope, everyone is different all equal or let 100 blossoms. e colors. let 100 schools bloom. what did chinese emperors say? that is, the world is not black and white, therefore, if we start today for some kind of expression of thoughts or or or a phrase that we did not like to persecute another person, publicly censure. then we can again come to a repetition. here are those tragic events of the twentieth year. well, maybe to a lesser extent, to one degree or another , this is the wrong core in the country, and ideologically, it should also unite, and do not sever, in addition, fire on their

public public showdown. this is also unacceptable. this can be used by our external enemy. and now we are in a state of actual hostilities, if in peacetime, god bless them, let them take courage, but now, uh, we must be monolithic, or at least show that we are monolithic. if you don't like something or someone, you call him, tell him, criticize and discuss. and it’s better to offer your own vision, so here i agree with you, what e radicalism is unacceptable. we must now unite and the top political leadership of belarus is talking about this, constantly starting to talk from that speech in the church on the eve of orthodox christmas that we need peace belarusians should be together

and uh, ending with the last speech of the head of state, and i support this, then is, we need peace, unity stability no confrontation. and if there are any issues , you can always solve them behind the scenes, because we are now in a military state, including ideological military ones. confrontation. and you have to be on the alert not to shake from the inside this is that from what. she is waiting for external enemies. well, i agree, we welcome when numerous headquarters in poland in lithuania begin to sort things out among themselves. for us. it's simple. tears need showers and at the same time repeat their mistakes. you see, even two people are not the same in the whole world among eight billion, so it’s okay if someone has such an approach, someone has a different approach , moreover, moreover, you know that the head of state, discuss some issues on

meetings. he never considers issues when there is one opinion and one point of view, he requires at least two or three solutions. this is more effective or recent today about philosophical questions. i confess i am an adept of biography books. i really like the speeches that changed the world and the people who change it. i was fascinated by your reading and i will not hide the second time i will read it already with a pencil, because there are things that really need to be analyzed. not easy to get information, but who do you think in the modern belarus worthy of the release of such books would you like to read, do you know last year's trips around the country? we talked on

this topic with the philosopher nikolai sergeevich shchekin, who unfortunately passed away from us. kingdom of heaven and i asked him, i say sergeyevich that the head of state would not write a biography book, because it was so interesting. and nikolai sergeevich said, and he wrote it. his book is belarus, it is the book of his destiny, the book of his life. but of course, i personally , as a beginner, would like to see literature. written journalism memoirs memories of alexander lukashenko i want to know everything, maybe even something that was not known before, related to construction. for these almost three

decades of an independent sovereign belarusian self-sufficient state. and i also wanted to talk about a very important thing. the fact is that i consider my book as a very sincere native work, aimed primarily at the doubting part of society. and , unfortunately, there are still such people. therefore, i could not immediately at first from this comes the title. i couldn't write at first epigraph. which i would like. in the epigraph, i thank the family for all the help, thanks to which i coped with all the trials of fate, well, of course, in invisible capital letters. literally capslock should

be written in it. to alexander lukashenko with gratitude for everything. hard training and exciting competition in training by numbers, i look at analyzing such a well-formed i am now, and i was satisfied with the competitions passed, go to the finish line and show, we have guys, there are creative guys , there are guys who can be, who can to play decent football at a good level, but in order for them to do this, they need time to show the results of the heart rejoice, honestly

and interesting matches of the regular season meetings. yes , 75 games 75 tigers played for the national teams. plus, this is what they have now left, that is, they have. there will be about 80 games, and you can watch people and events from the world of sports in projects on the belarus 24 tv channel

. hello , and in this episode , the believers are completing the sprinkling of holy water on easter treats and helping those who need it.