i return, we found and lost. sometimes they were sad and smiled, but thank god they understood time is running will not return what you sow will reap, only mine is even stronger.

my path is the wind. my road is stone. my road, my children , my road is next to you.

happy holiday.

good people here and far away good people

are so easy with you. call so light, holy judas bribe for this good people of different people.

with a false blade of grass and pure dew, the light will grab you only with you good, kind people with you, good, kind, people, good people, good people.

and distant kind people are so ice with you. a-ah, holy holy love all for this good people all for this good.

the century-old biography of the supreme court keeps many significant pages of judicial activity . the organizational structure of the functions and competence of the supreme court have undergone a change, but the main thing has remained unchanged. judges of the supreme court of different generations always give their strength

, knowledge and talent to the belarusian people without a trace always if evil instead of blood through the veins, if the people of the bride, we will raise our sky again for the sake of those who will come, after us there will be a beautiful dawn tomorrow. if we are strong now. if strong, we will now be our tomorrow with you in eternal light. we are pouring. we gave yesterday a happy just need we need. save the attraction to get never

save the good to live if someone alone on earth shared. our tomorrows are forever again all in the light. we thank the children in the palm of our hands. we will give your name lord happy, because

we will give the palms of the sunlight to children. we will give peace on the planet with gratitude, remember that yesterday our breakfast will be beautiful. attraction

from the supreme court

what are the features of this year, if they are the introductory company in the suzes of belarus , it should be noted that this year there are quite a lot of innovations? let's start with the fact that , in accordance with the new code on education , e-e educational institutions that implement technical and secondary specialized education programs have switched to a single type of college. therefore, this year e to the level vocational and technical stress and secondary special education. we will host a total of 296 institutions,

formations, of which 229 are colleges. and besides colleges , branches of institutions of higher education , gymnasiums of colleges of arts, and the school of the olympic reserve will traditionally host. we, let me stress again, both for the vocational education program for working professions, and for the level of secondary specialized education, where programs are traditionally implemented. a obtaining the qualification of a specialist and a worker with a secondary specialized education from innovations. e, this is a decree e on the rules for the admission of persons to receive secondary specialized education. e. the decree was adopted in 2022 for the first time, we will adopt it on the basis of it in the twenty-third. what is globally new is a reception, and on the basis of nine. on the basis of eleven classes and on the basis of vocational education on the basis of a competition of the average score, documents on education earlier on the basis of eleven

classes. it was necessary to pass a centralized testing, and on the basis of vocational education entrance examinations. now, let's say a uniform approach to the competition for secondary specialized education. as for the plumbing education. there are no such global innovations here. e admission will continue to be based on e, the single gpa competition. let me emphasize, we have slightly shifted the deadlines. e reception company earlier it was from june 15 to august 20 this year. reception will be from june 15 to august 23, that is the company extended in order. uh, let's put it this way , to attract to the vet level those who will not enter the level of secondary specialized education at the level of higher education. well, or let's say so, do not decide yet by the twentieth number with your profession. well, i also emphasize that traditionally , admission to groups is at the level of vocational education. e where

the number will not be formed. e will continue until september 15, so in the future of the applicant we are their parents. i need to follow the websites of the educational institution and watch. if you somehow they hesitated and did not have time to submit documents, then look for, then an educational institution that will continue admission until september 15 at the level of vocational technical education at the level of secondary specialized. the non-traditional company's reception will begin on july 20. well, it will continue somewhere until august 18 in detail it will be possible to find out in the resolution of the ministry of education with the terms. there, for different categories of applicants, the deadlines for accepting a document from giving entrance companies and entrance examinations will be established. it is for those who will enter creative specialties in specialties related to physical culture. i mean, it's the only one there. uh, the category of exclusion, where , in addition to the average score, you will also have to be allowed to enter the test and show your talents. it is necessary, for sure,

the list of offered specialties is updated annually in belarusian colleges, but this year. will there be completely new specialties that you can choose? yes , this year it will be traditional already. every year we update the list of specialties in this year. these are specialties such as the it sphere. that is , for example, the development of web resource maintenance and information security. it's, uh, the specialty of building energy efficient buildings. constructions - is a specialty of physical and chemical analysis of production products. that is, we are trying, let's say, to prepare people for production, who will work in laboratories, and with the help of, let's say, innovative equipment, to investigate some, er, characteristics of the products being manufactured. let's say the order e of the real sector. well, uh, beautiful special floral design. uh, brand new for a strange specialty. they are here for the first time and will be admitted for the first time in 2023.

1919, smolensk appears on the geopolitical map the belarusian soviet socialist republic begins a new countdown in history and the time for the people to comprehend their place under the sun very soon in the ussr forms the highest judicial bodies with the functions of a cassation supervisory authority 1923 is the starting point for the history of the supreme court and it is inextricably linked with history of formation belarusian statehood during the judicial century, generations even managed to change their epochs

of the world order. and these are the times when, with the independence of the state, our judicial system chose its path of rootless breakdowns, but with intensive development , taking into account the best experience of previous generations , the third stage of reform is behind us and fairness of justice is still the main principle. we have gone through three stages of reforming our system. with all our dictatorship with you in this. out of fifty-three thousand inmates at the beginning of my presidency today, they are 24. here and all dictatorship. this is a two-fold reduction over the period that we have gone through. this suggests that without excessive humanization , it is somehow customary for you to say that we have made a humane country and humane our justice. what is the supreme court of belarus like today? when for the first time in the history of the country's fundamental laws its high status was enshrined. what are

the tasks of our time? what is the principle of justice? what is a speedy court and what is the efficiency of justice today, if the criteria for its quality of the level of trust are the right , the law, justice, all this is a question number one and gost of the project is a person for whom a judge is not only a profession or vocation. this is a way of life and this man who stood at the origins of the national reform. the judiciary in one of your interviews you said that you would become a judge. it wasn't your childhood dream at all. such a conscious choice of an already mature person. what influenced this decision? you know, it seems to me that there are elements here, even accidents, maybe some kind of romanticism, because to say that since childhood i dreamed of becoming exactly that. it seems to me that it would not be entirely correct thought. they began to visit me much later, when i had already received a labor specialty. e

, some experience of the tribal service of the soviet army . i think i gathered a very serious role , it was there, it seems to me, that such a thing came. here. i have a feeling that i should be a lawyer preparing for exams. it was very serious, but then the task of exams at the belarusian state university at the faculty of law. and there already, probably, at the faculty of law itself in the process of learning. to me it seemed that i should be here. in this legal practice, in a wide choice , it seemed to me that the judge is the lawyer who makes the most independent decision-making, and i regret making the final legal decisions. i don't regret it. no, i don't. i think it's hmm really my no longer just a profession it's my way of life. i think maybe even a state of mind to you as a matter of fact. i had to create this national judicial system to carry out reforms. and remember, from what it all began, some was the spirit of the ages thirty years of modern history, it

occupies a special place in the history of belarusian justice and the supreme court. this was the period of formation of the young belarusian statehood, in principle, after the formation of the independence of the belarusian state. and of course, it was necessary to form not only state authorities in general, but also the judicial system. moreover , to form it in the process of work constantly does not become justice for more than one day. it was difficult enough, it was difficult at all. do you remember, for us it was complexities budget for signaling. to bring reforms, well, then the task of the head of state was set to form a national judicial system and a national model of belarusian justice. and so, since it turned out that this task was entrusted by the president of the country to the supreme court, the supreme court initiated many decisions judicial and legal reform. here for these 30 years. three stages of judicial-law reform have been carried out. today we can talk about the completion of the third stage and it must be said that, in our opinion, we managed to create

modern ones do not cause such a centralized rubber organizationally strong judicial system, which is capable of withstanding any trials today, therefore, i think that in general these 30 years have passed through such very stressful work, but it is the supreme court of cases on health, the initiators of fate on tried reforms in general in the country and it seems to me that this is, uh, a task. she decided to a large extent succeeded, if look here for more than 100 years, how can one evaluate in general all this passed. you will also take into account a piece of recent history. this it turned out that i can compare, because i found this soviet period. maybe it was a little simpler and calmer, because the courts of the belarusian soviet sociological republic and the supreme court were part of a single system of unions ; the last judicial station was the supreme court of the ussr union and all judicial practice was formed there and that’s all, the legislation is connected with the arrangement or special production of the republic of belarus, too, in general, was regulated based on non- conscious legislation, therefore, if

to compare these two periods, they are very important historical ones, it seems to me that after all , this is a thirty-year period of recent history. it would be on the more difficult the most difficult. for some reason , i remember it more than the period when we were reforms within the soviet union - this is not some kind of radical break. these are some traditions. foundations. it was one of those serious concepts, we worked on several types of concepts. judicial reform , and especially with the belarusian model, was that we really could not breaking the foundations of the judiciary there were a lot of applications of this kind, but we proceeded from the fact that the most, perhaps the easiest to do and no more needed to be done. we got out of those problems that we needed now right away and therefore we were very careful in choosing a concept and rather went along the path of improving legal proceedings and reducing the judicial burden. we went down the path of reduced judicial europeans. and we began

to reduce the judicial presence. that is, we did everything in order to make it easier, difficult , syndidatively, all sharp work within the framework of existing systems without additional strength. the point is in general. we were careful, maybe, m-m, we were not in a hurry in the judicial reform, silent or negative towards colleagues and neighbors, but in general we fulfilled what we set ourselves and rejected all such proposals about what we need to say was what he proposed to do. and they did what we needed to do during this period. this concept was accepted by the judicial community at the first world court. it was they who proposed such a concept of fate for the reform. today we can say that this collective opinion is primarily a practice in court that was not perceived. these are some very radical reforms related to the structure, so we have retained , in general, such a simple judicial system based on administrative territorial divisions in our country.

it is clear that the system is three-door, but in general they improved production during that period, and today this confirms that we did, in principle, the right thing? compare what is the workload today in court and what is it was before this is one of the collective tasks that we solved, if in the ninety- seventh year the load was commandment. it was exceeded, let's say it made a month for one working judge, but today it is the optimal load. 65 i will make materials for one people's judge, and the very types of justice, the types of legal proceedings, judicial procedures are so simplified that they are not comparable with the fact that earlier we managed to find this optimal, let's say, middle ground between the quality of the vasyu and the speed of pushing through. the long-standing dream and task of all those involved in judicial reforms is to make law soon. yes, and equal well, equal, in the sense of a synonym for justice. now, if these three

tasks are achieved, then, in general, this is the goal of the judicial forum, and the fairness of the judgment for you personally. what does these words mean in our legislation, designated as a principle? as the most important principle conducts at all its stages from beginning to end and in all types of justice, therefore, i believe that justice is a principle that can be to strive for each essence of each court is not by chance the oath of each of its own judges there are such words. it’s also that a judge should be impartial and fair, let’s say this standard, which every judge should strive for in his daily activities, daily activities, and i associate or perceive not only a court decision, how fair, well, that’s it, the judicial procedure, how fair , if it is carried out, then the judgment was certainly fair. if you say uh, in my opinion, then fair, probably, it can be recognized that a court decision, which is not only formally a law, but is smart, in

fact, executable, perceived from the point of view of public opinion and public assessments. now, if this successfully coincides, then we can assume that such a court decision is certainly fair, the court has fulfilled the conditions of the task to the maximum. and in your practice, you had to make such decisions that you knew that in society they would not be perceived unambiguously in a court decision when administering justice in this directly. entry on the code of honor of a judge, he must be guided only by law and personal conviction. here is the public opinion. yes, it cannot be ignored. it is realized and sometimes public opinion can come out, emotionally excessive or, say, erroneous in time, there may be a different assessment of justice in any society, therefore, yes, there may be such cases when a court decision may not be perceived as positive by society, nevertheless, the judge must perform their professional duty and perform those tasks

which stand before him the judge's convictions what is it? this is how to feel, it's not completely something without being subjective and completely broad no. personal conviction is also limited by law and must necessarily be based on a comprehensive, complete , objective study of all circumstances, making them total. now, if such a conviction is formed on the basis of these requirements, if you have fulfilled everything that you are supposed to fulfill in the course of justice, then. you have the right to a personal opinion. you have it you have the right to put it as the basis for making a decision. that is , it is something they accomplished in the course. here is the justice process. sorry, then your personal assessment and personal conviction. hmm can be found unfounded by a higher court, as miscarriages of justice. they are, in principle, possible today, and if this is the criterion for the quality of justice, for this, the system of administering courts is consciously, in order to eliminate possible judicial errors as much as possible for this, and some procedure for the entry into force of laws in

destruction to some stage superior here. we will correct these errors. well, here is the maximum task for everyone, to reduce them to a minimum and correct them in time. that's the whole system of courts, it's just built in such a way that each higher court checks from everyone who has general vision, the decision that was something real by the court up to 2% in general, the abolition of court decisions. we have nothing to do with it. this process is there further they are well, because we are looking at the additional loading on sony on the complexity of justice of this or that master, because we have a specialization of a judge in specific areas of justice and evaluate the quality of the work of a judge in the aggregate updating the basic law of the country e we know that it is planned to elect judges of the supreme court in a public format. and will it give an additional guarantee of their independence and impartiality. here, in your opinion, if we talk about the constitutional changes that have taken place, that is, directly of course, we did not expect them very much. we really expected them, because

they fixed at the constitutional level the type of provisions that were adopted during carrying out judicial reform wire. let's say the status of the supreme court has fundamentally changed. it has already changed in essence since the fourteenth year, when the supreme court took over all the functions of the ministry of justice in, say, judicial administration and judicial support for all types of activities. it is made to assume an additional sophisticated function in the organization of the pro you. and of course, here is the fourteenth year. this is the period when the supreme court, having received these additional functions, assumed a very high degree of responsibility, when it became a being head the entire judicial system of courts of general jurisdiction. and, of course, this had to be enshrined at a fairly high legislative level, and the fact that article 112 note today, the constitutional status of the supreme court is enshrined in our constitution. i'm fundamentally important this is the first time in history, by the way.