it is sucked up to the milk and no one else touches it, only at the exit. you get a pack or a bottle further according to our guests, here are all the regulations. e of the customs union, according to all standards, milk is considered milk without any additives, nothing is added there. milk. you can only fortify milk. for this special document, how much of what is our center. in general, practically an ingredient a long time ago, 20 years ago, it was all worked out. developed. how much to add? nothing else. here you buy milk. it is native present and so on. yes, they can degrease it, they can remove the fat, from which they will then receive cream, and so on , this, please, is a choice. i also prefer not milk 3 2%, but not zero percent, one and a half 2% - this is good, all the more i want to add that well done, absolutely essential fatty acids, saturated to saturated , depending on the fat content, which remain yes, everything is in milk, but on the other hand

, just, well, someone doesn't need a load of extra fat. it's still animal fat . but i think if you are fine for the sake of it, they work fine. liver your cholesterol will be checked regularly and so on. why should i limit myself? for what? am i completely wrong? well, again, our people are used to it. milk - this is what it is a drink, and this is not a drink, they do not remove their thirst. this is food after drinking a glass of milk. in the morning you may not eat anything until lunch. you have already received everything in the world . almost a billion tons of 900 million tons of cows of milk are produced annually. what does this product say that is necessary and useful? thank you so much no more questions. and we continue and right now we will tell you about new products recipes, which were developed, of course, by our scientists, taking milk as a basis.

perhaps scientists would never have undertaken these developments, however, the problems that now exist themselves prompted researchers to think about the possibility of their implementation. the main one is the high consumption of sugar and high-calorie foods, especially in the children's diet , these problems affect residents of almost all countries of the world, which result in the development of obesity and other diseases. seeing this problem by the specialists of the meat institute the dairy industry developed a line of sweet dairy products such as ice cream, cottage cheese products with a reduced calorie content reduced by 30% sugar, as well as replacing sugar with low-calorie sweeteners of sweet but healthy dairy products and investigators worked for about 3 years. these products have a balanced nutritional composition, reduced glycemic index and are intended for nutrition of all categories of the population, including children and people with diabetes,

despite the reduction in calories and lack of sugar. these products have a classic taste typical for dairy products with sugar. and now we continue to develop a line of sweet dairy products. well, from those technologies that have already been developed, ice cream will also be put into production in the near future, so belarusians will soon be able to see these products in the store. the legendary russian physiologist ivan pavlov in one of her works wrote milk - this is an amazing food prepared by nature itself about the benefits of this product and the improvement of the recipe by our scientists said today and we dare to hope once again. proved that science is near. we

confidently walk into the new day and do it to our own music, the music that sounds inside each of us. she is everywhere the sun in not timid, movements at our fingertips , music inspires, makes us think and opens up thousands of ways for us, can change the world, because it can change us, music is inside each of us.

1919, smolensk, the belarusian soviet socialist republic appears on the geopolitical map, a new one begins the countdown of history and the time for the people to comprehend their place under the sun very soon in the ussr forms the highest judicial body with the functions of a cassation supervisory authority . world order. and these are the times when, with

the independence of the state, our judicial system chose its own path without fundamental breaks, but with intensive development with taking into account the best experience of previous generations , the third stage of the reform is behind and fairness of justice is still the main principle. we have gone through three stages of reforming our system. with all our dictatorship with you in this. out of fifty-four thousand inmates at the beginning of my presidency today, they are 24. that's the whole dictatorship. this is a two -fold reduction over the period that we have gone through. this suggests that without excessive humanization it is somehow customary for you to say we have made a humane country and humane our justice in what it is today the supreme court of belarus when for the first time in history the main laws of the country enshrined its high status, what are the challenges

of today? what is the principle of justice? what is a speedy court and what is the efficiency of justice today, if the criteria for his quality of the level of trust are the rights, the law, justice, all this is the number one issue and the guest of the project is a person for whom a judge is not only a profession or vocation. this is a way of life and this man who stood at the origins of the national reform. judicial system in one of your interviews, you said that to become a judge - it was not a dream at all . your childhood about such a conscious choice of an already mature person. what influenced this decision? you know, it seems to me that there are elements here, even accidents, maybe some kind of romanticism, because to say that since childhood i dreamed of becoming a judge. i don't think it would be quite the right idea. they began to visit me much later, when i had already received a labor specialty. e, some experience of the tribal service

of the soviet army. i think i gathered a very serious role exactly there, it seems to me, it came like this. here. i have a feeling that i should be a lawyer preparing for exams. it was very serious. well, quite for the person exams at the belarusian state university at the faculty of law. and here already, probably, at the faculty of law itself in the process of learning. it seemed to me that i should be that's it in this legal practice with everything up to a wide choice. it seemed to me that the judge is exactly the lawyer who makes the most independent decision-making, and i regret making final legal decisions. i'm about this no i do not regret. i believe that this is really my no longer just a profession, it's my way of life. i think maybe even a state of mind to you as a matter of fact. we had to create this national judicial system to carry out reforms. and remember, from what everything started in general, there was a thirty-year period of zeitgeist, hanging history, it occupies a special place in the history of belarusian justice and the supreme court.

it was the period of the formation of the young belarusian statehood, in principle, in general, after the formation of independence belarusian state. and of course, it was necessary to form not only state authorities in general, but also the judicial system. moreover , to form in the process of work constantly and without stopping justice for more than one day. it was difficult enough, it was difficult at all. you remember in the nineties. here it was the complexity of the budget for the signals to bring the reform. well, even then it was we set the task of the head of state to form a national judicial system and a national model of belarusian justice. and so, since it turned out that this task was entrusted by the president of the country to the supreme court . the supreme court became the initiator of many decisions of the judicial and legal reform. here for these 30 years. three stages of judicial reform have been carried out. today we can talk about the completion of the third stage, and i must say that in my opinion. we managed to create such a centralized rubber organizationally strong judicial system,

which today is able to withstand any tests that are not caused by modern ones. therefore , i think that, in general, these 30 years have passed. under such a very intense work can be, but it is the supreme court that made all the roads, the initiators of the fate of the reform, in general in the country, and it seems to me that this task has been expanded to a degree. and if you look here for more than 100 years, how can you estimate, in general, this whole path traveled, taking into account a segment of recent history. it so happened that i can compare, because i found this soviet period. maybe it was somewhat simpler and calmer, because he courts of the belarusian soviet sociological republic and the supreme court were part of a single the system of unions at the last judicial station was the supreme court of the ussr union and all judicial practice was formed there and all legislation related to shipbuilding or special proceedings of the republic of belarus was also generally regulated by the union legislation, therefore, if i compare these two periods, they are very important

historical, it seems to me that after all, this resettlement period is the latest history, it would be more difficult and more difficult. for some reason i remember him more than that's the period when we were under the reform of the soviet union. it's not some kind of fundamental breakdown. these are some traditions. foundations. it was one of those big concepts, we were working on several kinds of concept, everything is right and special. from the belarusian model , it was that we really couldn’t break the foundations of the judiciary, there were a lot of applications of this kind, but we proceeded from the fact that it might be easier to do and more needed to be done. we left because of the problems that we needed now right away and therefore we were very careful in choosing the concept and rather took the path of a completely non-special production of lowering the judiciary. on the contrary, with whom we went to reduce the european judiciary. we have begun to shorten the judicial procedures. that is, we have done everything

in order to ease the complexity of sharp labor within the existing system without additional staff. generally. we were careful. maybe, m-m, they were not in a hurry in the judicial reform, they were silent about the negative attitude towards colleagues and neighbors, but in general we did what we set in front of us rejected all such suggestions about what we needed to say, what she suggested doing, and did what we needed to do. this concept was accepted by the judicial community at the first world court. it was they who proposed just such a concept of the judicial process of the form; today we can say that this collective opinion is primarily a practice in court that they did not perceive. these are some very radical reforms related to housing development, so we have kept, in general, such a simple judicial system. a system based on administrative territorial divisions on our side. it is clear that the system is three-link, and

they improved, in general, a special production. that period today confirms that we did, in principle, the right thing? a compare what is the workload today in court and what it was before, this is one of the opposing tasks that we solved, if in the ninety-seventh year the workload was beyond the limit. she exceeded, let's say , made the material of a month for one more work of a judge, but today it is optimal the load decides six five dollars per one people's court. moreover, the very types of justice, the types of legal proceedings, the judicial procedures are so simplified that they are not comparable with what we had before, we managed to find this optimal, let's say, middle ground between the quality of justice and the speed for you. the long-standing dream and task of all those involved in judicial reforms is to make the right soon. yes, and equal well, equal, in the sense of a synonym for justice. now, if these three tasks are achieved, then, in general, this is the goal of the judicial send-off, and

the fairness of the judgment for you personally. what do these words mean in our legislation designated as a principle? as the most important principle of justice in all its articles from beginning to end and in all types of justice, therefore, i believe that justice is a principle that every essence of every court can strive for, not by chance the oath of every judge. there are also words that a judge must be impartial and fair. let's say this standard , which every judge should strive for in his daily activities, daily activities, and i associate or perceive not only the court decision, how fair it is the entire judicial procedure, how fair , if it is carried out, then the court decision was certainly fair. speaking, uh, in my opinion, it can probably be recognized as fair, then a court decision that is not only formally legal, but is smart,

in fact, executable, perceived from the point of view of public opinion and public assessments. so, if this matches well, then then we can assume that, of course, such a judgment is fair, the court has fulfilled its task to the maximum. and in your practice, you had to make decisions that you knew would be accepted in society. there is no unequivocal adoption of a judicial decision in the administration of justice in this directly written in the code of honor of a judge, he should be guided only by he and personal conviction, here, but public opinion. yes, it cannot be taught, it is realized and sometimes a public opinion, emotionally superfluous or, say , erroneous in time, there may be a different assessment of justice for any society, therefore, yes, such cases can be when a court decision. maybe i am not perceived as so positive by society, nevertheless, the judge must fulfill his professional duty and fulfill the tasks that face him. the judge's convictions. what is it? this is how

to feel, it's not completely something without being subjective and completely broad no. personal conviction is also limited by law must necessarily be based on a comprehensive complete objective study of all the circumstances, making them together. now, if such a conviction is formed on the basis of these requirements, if you have fulfilled everything that you are supposed to do in the course of justice, then you have the right to a personal conviction. you've got it. you have the right to put it's all about making a decision. that is, it did not fulfill something in the course. here is the justice process. sorry, then your personal assessment and personal conviction can be recognized as unfounded superior court, and miscarriages of justice. they are, in principle, possible today, and if this is the criterion for the quality of justice, for this a system of expanding courts has been created in order to eliminate possible judicial errors as much as possible for this, and some procedure for the entry into force of laws in destruction is observed, so that for some stage

forthcoming and courts. deal with these errors. well, here is the maximum task for everyone, to reduce them to a minimum and correct them in time. here is the whole system of courts, it is built in such a way that each superior court checks from all who are of all sight, then the decision that was lower, the present court up to 2% in general , the abolition of judgments. we do not have the main thing connected. this is a percentage of ours. well , because we are looking at the burden on the middle of the complexity of justice in addition. it will surprise you that we have a specialization of a judge in specific areas of justice and we evaluate the quality of the work of a judge in the totality of updating the basic law of the country. we know that it is planned to elect judges of the supreme court in a public format. will this give an additional guarantee of their independence and impartiality. here, in your opinion, if we talk about the constitutional changes that have taken place, that is, directly, of course , we did not expect them very much. we were very much looking forward to them, because they

consolidated at the constitutional level those provisions that were adopted in the course of the judicial legal reform. let's say the status of the supreme court has fundamentally changed. it has already changed in essence since the fourteenth year, when the supreme court assumed the functions of the ministry of justice for, say, judicial administration, judicial provision of all activities. he made himself an additional complex function of organizing justice and of course that's the fourteenth year. this is the period when the supreme court, having received these additional functions, assumed a very high degree of responsibility, when it became essentially the head of the entire judicial system of courts of general jurisdiction. and, of course, it had to be enshrined at a fairly high legislative level, and the fact that these are the ones, 112 note today , the constitutional status of the supreme court is enshrined in our constitution. this fundamentally important. by the way, this was done for the first time in history and we are proud of it.

well, the fact that we have the supreme court today has received such a high status not only as a body headed by the judicial system of courts within the jurisdiction, but also as the highest body of justice in civil criminal administrative cases. that is, today he combines the idea of ​​the most important functions of the function of pure justice, how he conducts justice and bodies, how they still provide a functional system of courts of a common religion, this is quite problematic and difficult, because to understand 157 there are almost 5,000 ships operating and we need to make sure that every day there is everything very enough all kinds of support, where they make about 4,000 decisions. and now it's all in the supreme court today. well, the fact that he was elected a judge of the supreme court there, was going to be dismissed when the people's assembly was publicly open at such a high forum. yes, we understand the degree of responsibility that we are entrusted with is not only the election, but also the liberation in general with

the belarusian people as an assembly. that is, judging the supreme court received a higher constitutional status. you know, if we talk about the constitutional consolidation of the entire belarusian people's assembly, let's say this is also, in general, an idea that was nurtured and suggested itself significantly quite a long time ago it happened that i took part in all belarusian people's meetings, and at the first belarusian people's assembly i even spoke . in the future, the minister of justice justified the need. here is such a forum and, of course, even then it was clear that mmm this is a very effective form, and she it is necessary just very such extreme situations such emergency situations can be, and in the life of each side is that it was not fixed. it is, so to speak, necessarily at the constitutional level. probably it was necessary that it was necessary in a modern judge of the supreme court, what kind of person is, in short, this is by far the best judge in the country a judge

who is betrayed by the judicial community into a common authoritative judge not only as high professionals, but also as a model of compliance judicial code of honor and judges. that is it indeed a judge who has reached his maximum childish career, who has gone through all the stages of judicial work that are perceived in the judicial community. indeed, like e, it’s better this is our golden fund, let’s say there are few of them in the judicial community, by the way, but these are really people who we are such a symbol of our belarusian orthodoxy for whom the profession of a judge is not just a profession. and this way of life is already this, maybe even excuse me with the state of some soul , even one that does not represent all the time, otherwise here is how to be performed. here is your public professional duty. he's at such a high level, which is why supreme court justices are proud of their title. they

cherish this evocation of a piece of history of 100 years. and how do you see the future of the judicial system cannot stop for more than one day in its development and improvement, and therefore the main task. in the coming period, they can master the legislative novelties and the changes that will be in the judicial system. well maximize efficiency and keep moving more, if you speak. in principle, as its task. we set ourselves this to make our judicial system so you know modern, efficient, economical and perceived by society, that is, with a high level of trust and society. that's just with the introduction of all fair to the judiciary, whom you asked how to achieve this. we have such a program of our own that works perfect. no, this is achieved in three ways. the first is the efficiency of justice is digitalization to help. these are not only implementation figures, but this is precisely reduced judicial reflexes. this is care. it's

like some kind of redundant outdated judicial procedures. it's digitalization, really. this, maybe even you know, is the one window that many people talk about and dream about, which should also be in the judiciary. here is one window for me in the judicial system. and this is when each dispute is considered in preliminary and judicial and one judicial trial. now, if this is so, this is precisely the speed of the court, which, in performing its functions, if we talk about the quality of justice, then here, of course, primarily due to the stability of the legislator with the improvement of the quality of legal education and the quality of the judiciary. i think this is a reasonable specialization in the branches of law. this is an analysis of professional balanced jurisprudence; this may be a decrease in the conflict content of our justice ; restoration may be more conciliatory tendencies in our justice. that is, such a very difficult task, it is

important today in order to expand the conciliatory possibilities of the belarusian justice, reducing its conflict. well , of course, it's different. uh, the combination of worlds of criminal responsibility is also an optimization. that's it. it's all about quality , i assure you. and finally, the third task is to make it equal in the morning. for everyone, this is a synonym for justice, equal, which means, in general, fair. the most important thing in judiciary is trust. people, because any lawsuit begins with a question of trust in the court. and now, if there is such trust, there is society, well, then we can assume that the court is fulfilling its tasks, entrusted to him, of course, is the openness of processes and judicial decisions. this is the development of publicity. today we place all our court decisions on the right portals. that is, they are open to society. here is the task to make the decision-making procedure itself understandable and open to people for society. so, when we complete these, maybe three such single tasks. well, in principle, we will assume that there

we managed to create, uh, a modern judicial system, an effective judicial system and the supreme court, which is at the head of this systems, what is in this in the whole context for you personally? question number one is to really make people perceive our judgment. as you know, this is the body where you can go to protect your rights, that is, they were not afraid. yes, they went to court, as it were becoming, well, compare with the clinic. yes, when the need is inexplicable and they went to the court for advice for some kind of consultation with an explanation, so that the judge and the court become such a trusting body for people who would really think that yes. this is x, this is the court that will protect will help restore extended all rights. here's to making such a judicial system. here is a modern one, i really think this is my personal dream and a dream as a professor. here, make sure that the main people perceive us as that

system and platform that will protect them to do such justice, i would say that i perceive you people to do justice, which is very appropriate for our society, because well, if we have such an attitude, here at the state level is man number one, then made it so that in court there was man number one comfortable. my whole idea, all my thoughts, are just aimed at ensuring that such a judicial system can be remembered by people and perceived by people, and here the main thing is so that the supreme court itself and the entire judicial system will be united today. well, and most importantly, you know, maybe even make sure that outwardly and justice looks very dignified. modern. it instills respect in people. trust the right to those decisions of justice that are made in these buildings, so it is very important here is the material level of the building the courts of our hall - this is also very important such

a set of tasks that i set as the first-born, as far as i managed to condemn it is not necessary, but in general, it seems to me the judicial system. today shows such examples of sustainability connected with the cohesion of the unity reasonable organizational unity and its ability to resist all the modern language and trends that are taking place in the world. what was the earthly path of the saints in christianity here he found his earthly love here he left for us the eternal memory of his prayers and about one's invisible intercession and intercession before god what is

the basis of a person's spiritual life, the beauty of love, here one wants to be constantly unites completely different people. this is the very positive amazing wonderful result that these conversations give, when people are not only interested in spiritual life, but the most important thing is that they unite, that they form, as it were, one team, as a believer learn to live with god in the heart. spiritual, because a person consists of

three parts of the body soul, spirit, answers to these and other questions in spiritual and educational projects on belarus 24 tv channel churches and churches, he is a prisoner of the royal city sounding in a political role. we will recognize you behind the architectural memorabilia of belarus is a close butt.

let's talk about how to be open to the world, no matter what i'm always ready to pick up. i always say we can we will we want, because i get really excited about really talented ideas, in fact, the main goal. uh we persecuted if our citizen has an idea that can be commercialized. he must have every opportunity to realize it, which is why we are spinning. so what's more, here many say the market is the market. here is the market the market needs to spin. what is the theater to answer energy exchange. and why it will always be the same, because people come, spectators come, and we also give energy. you give us back, we have a cycle, and something happens we start