[000:00:00;00] looking at the swift, optimistic, cheerful elena, it’s hard to believe that 11 years ago, this woman literally didn’t want to live, the death of her husband became a real tragedy for her. and it’s not even that she was left alone with four daughters, the youngest, of whom was the one moment only 8 years old. she has lost a lot. more. i fell inside. you understand that your soul mate is about to leave me and he is gone. and i left you, understood my head and yelled, take it. i can’t be here, i can’t take it without you, and i’m somehow strong with my daughter, well, i have to go out, how you her. well, i say, well, it's okay. if i say anything to the risk, bring up, the child is needed, the child is not needed. i need a sister, but it's not going on and educates you should

put it by us. this conversation worked like a cold rain, elena understands, only she can pull herself out of depression. she decides to sell the house in the village and move to the district center of zelva, so that it would be more convenient for her youngest daughter to get to school after the death of her husband , 40 days have not yet passed, and elena enrolls in driving courses, oddly enough, this the way out of depression turned out to be the most effective for 50 years, elena gets the right

to be given, i'll pass no the instructor answered. on his old yellow volkswagen, and not overjoyed, the car gives freedom of movement and saves time. she is light. on the rise. maybe spontaneously organize any trip and gather a company in a matter of minutes. all my friends are like that, they are all moving, we do not have enough time. well, it calls, where are you, i'm at home, let's go to the forest. well, after how many in 10 minutes i will call everything else. what are you are you doing? i'm sitting at home, and in 10 minutes. i'm picking you up, we're going to the forest. all right, let's go to the forest. now son. more from the festival. what are you doing? at home now and so they went to come. yes, yes, so in 10 minutes. i got dressed near your house. let's go to the car give the opportunity to move. elena filled her life to the maximum. she understood one important

prince not to get caught up in the negative thoughts of depression. we need to complete the movement. all 24 hours a day work travel by car trip to daughters, but sometimes you need one stay the famous lake in the potion one of the most beautiful belarus for elena instead of the power of editing. you can’t imagine what kind of lake you see, it’s this dome that doesn’t always seem to be strongly under some kind of guarded dome. after the death of her husband, she began to write poetry, they come, as if from nowhere , elena speaks on her own and almost all of them are dedicated to her husband and relatives in one way or another. i want to hug you. silently, quietly the fire burns. you are silent,

elena confesses, she tries not to live in the past. yes, you can argue for a long time, as it were everything could have worked out if she had chosen a career, not a family and children. where would her fate lead, if she stayed in the big city. you will get good emotions, he will begin to feel sorry for himself and begin, but it could be so, but as they say, you don’t take yourself to curse. enough is enough. i always say, think about how much you will be much worse than you are apart. you are worse than you. therefore, your husband left. yes, it means giving. thank you. some have

such a husband, not such a husband, which i remember every day. they were not like that, you know. elena considers herself completely ordinary, but the peculiarity of this woman is that throughout her life the focus of her attention was not on herself, but on others. here's the question. what stereotype are you breaking elena answers not a worthy person to himself, not one who has no shortcomings, but one who has dignity. maybe this is my main talent. i see in everyone the best of the planet and we talk with someone who is good for us. the truth is, well, the person from which you generally have on some issues

and verses. we do not tell dry historical facts, we plunge into the era. this red brick building, located on the eastern outskirts of the city, perfectly reminds of those times, when one of the oldest belarusian enterprises worked in dubrovno dneprovsky manufactory artifacts of secular history,

a real puzzle for us, as time travelers, what is this good question little paddle my option. i will give you a hint, this hygiene product is ear sticks, the task of our guides is to ignite you with a desire to touch the belarusian culture, personally. if a girl touches the slutsk belt, it becomes dark. yes, men only had such touching the golden silver thread, madam today the weather is especially pleasant , don’t you find yourself traveling with

the belarus 24 tv channel

. the sun very soon in the ussr forms a higher judicial body with the functions of the cassation-supervisory instance in 1923 , the starting point of the history of the supreme court and it is inextricably linked with the history of the formation of the belarusian statehood during the judicial century, even generations of the world order managed to change their epochs. and these are the times when, with the independence of the state, our judicial system chose its path without fundamental breaks, but with intensive development , taking into account the best experience of previous generations , the third stage of the reform is behind us and fairness of justice is still the main principle. we have gone through three stages of reforming our systems. with all our dictatorship with you in this. of the fifty-four thousand inmates at the beginning of my presidency today, 24. that 's the whole dictatorship is a two-fold reduction in the period that we have gone through.

this suggests that without excessive humanization it is somehow customary for you to say we have made a humane country and humane our justice in what it is today the supreme court of belarus when for the first time in history the main law of the country enshrined its high status, what are the tasks of our time? what is the principle justice? what is a speedy court and what is the efficiency of justice today, if the criteria for his quality of the level of trust are the rights, the law, justice, all this is the number one issue and the guests of the project are a person for whom a judge is not only a profession or vocation. this is a way of life this person who stood at the origins of the reform of the national judiciary in one of your interviews you said that you would become a judge. it wasn't your childhood dream at all. such a conscious choice of an already mature person. what influenced this

solution? you know, it seems to me that there are elements here, even accidents, maybe some kind of romanticism, because to say that since childhood i dreamed of becoming exactly that. it seems to me that it would not be entirely correct thought. they began to visit me much later, when i had already received a labor specialty. uh. here is some experience of the tribal service of the soviet army. i think i gathered a very serious role there, it seems to me that such a thing has come. i have a feeling that i should be a lawyer exam preparation was very seriously, but quite passing the exams at the belarusian state university at the faculty of law. and here already, probably, at the law faculty itself , it seemed to me that i should be here. it was in this legal profession, with a wide choice, it seemed to me that the judge is the lawyer who makes the most independent decision-making, and i regret making the final legal decisions. i don't regret it. no, i don't. i think

it's hmm really my no longer just a profession it's my way of life. i think, maybe even a state of mind to you in essence. i had to create this national judicial system to carry out reforms. and remember, how did it all begin for some kind of was the spirit of time thirty-year period. recent history, it occupies a special place in the history of belarusian justice and the supreme court. this was the period of formation of the young belarusian statehood, in principle, after the formation of the independence of the belarusian state. and of course, it was necessary to form not only the state body of power as a whole, but also judicial system. moreover , i do not constantly form in the process of work, and justice is not for one day. it was difficult enough, it was difficult at all. you remember in the nineties it was the complexity of the budget for the signals. to carry out reforms, well, then you were given the task of the head of state to form a national judicial system and a national model of belarusian justice. and so, since it turned out that this task was entrusted by the president of the country to the supreme

court in judicial and legal reform. here for these 30 years. three stages of judicial reform have been carried out. today we can talk about the completion of the third stage, and i must say that in my opinion. we managed to create such a centralized rubber organizationally strong judicial system that is able today to withstand any test and cause modern ones. therefore , i think that in general these 30 years have passed through such very stressful work, but it was the supreme court that did it, the initiators of fate on tried reforms in general in the country and it seems to me that this is a task. it has expanded to a large extent, if you look at the width of 100 years, how can you evaluate in general all this passed. you will also take into account a piece of recent history. it turned out that i can compare, because i found this soviet period. perhaps it was somewhat simpler and calmer, because he courts of the belarusian soviet sociological republic and the supreme court

were part of a single union system; the last judicial station was the supreme court. union of the ussr all judicial practice was formed there and all the legislation related to devices or special production of the republic of belarus, too, in general, the basis of non-union legislation was regulated. therefore, if i compare these two periods, they are very important historical ones, then it seems to me that after all , this is a thirty-year period of recent history. it would have been more complicated than the most difficult for me, so for some reason i remember it to a greater extent than that period when we were, uh, within the framework of the soviet union reform - this is not some kind of radical break. this some traditions. foundations. it was one of those serious concepts, we worked on several types of concepts. judicial reform, and especially with the belarusian model , was that we really couldn’t break the foundations of the judiciary, there were a lot of applications of this kind, but we proceeded from

the fact that it is most, perhaps easier to do and most necessary to do. we got out of those problems that we needed now right away and therefore we were very careful in choosing the concept and rather went along the path improvement of legal proceedings and reduction of the judicial burden. we have gone down the path of reducing judicial europeans, and we have begun to reduce judicial crime. that is, we have done everything to facilitate the complex synthesis of sharp labor within the framework of existing systems without additional numbers. here. generally. we were careful, maybe, we were not in a hurry in judicial reform, we learned negative attitudes towards colleagues and neighbors, but in general we fulfilled what we set ourselves and rejected everything such suggestions about what we needed to say, what he proposed to do. and they did what we needed to do during this period. this concept was accepted by the judicial community at the first world court . it was they who proposed such a concept of judicial reform. today we can say that this is the collective opinion

, first of all, of the practitioners in the court, who did not perceive it. these are some very radical , uh , employment-related reforms, which is why we have kept, in general, such a simple judicial system, based on the administrative territorial division on our side. it is clear that the system is three-door, but they improved it in general by a special production. that period and today it confirms that we did, in principle, the right thing? compare what is the load today at the court and what it was before, this is one of our positive tasks that we solved if in the ninety-seventh year the load was commandment. it was exceeded, then let's say it made a month per worker standing, then today it is the optimal load. 65 case materials for one people's judge, and the most types of justice , types of legal proceedings, judicial procedures are so reduced that they are not comparable with what we used to be able to find this optimal, let's say, middle ground

between the quality of pro vasyu and the speed of pushing through. the long-standing dream and task of all those involved in judicial reforms is to make it right soon. yes, and equal well, equal, in the sense of synonyms for justice. now, if these three tasks are achieved, then, in general, this is achieved by a judicial send-off, and justice is a judicial decision for you personally. what does these words mean in our legislation, designated as a principle? as the most important principle conducts at all its stages from beginning to end and in all types of justice, therefore, i believe that justice is a principle that every essence of every court can strive for, it is not by chance that the oath of each judge has such words. also, that a judge must be impartial and fair, let's say this standard , which every judge should strive for in his daily activities, daily activities, and i associate or perceive not only the court decision, how fair,

well, everything, the judicial procedure, how fair, now, if it is carried out, then the court decision was certainly fair. if we say e, in my opinion, then it can probably be recognized as fair, then a court decision, which is not only a formal law, but is smart, in fact, executable, perceived from the point of view of public opinion and public assessments. now, if this successfully coincides, then we can assume that it is certainly the court decision is fair, the court has fulfilled its task as much as possible. and in your practice, you had to make such decisions that you knew that in society they would not be perceived unequivocally when making a judicial decision when administering justice in this directly. it is written in the judge's code of honor that he should be guided only by the law and personal conviction from public opinion. yes, it cannot be taught, it is realized and sometimes

public opinion can come out, emotionally excessive or, let's say, erroneous in time, maybe a different assessment of justice for any society, therefore, such cases may occur when a court decision may not be perceived as so positive by society, nevertheless, the judge must fulfill his professional duty and fulfill the tasks that the judge's convictions face him . what is it? this is how to feel, it's not completely something without being subjective and completely broad no. personal conviction is also limited by law and must necessarily be based on a comprehensive, complete , objective study of all circumstances, making them aggregate. now, if such a conviction is formed on the basis of these requirements, if you have fulfilled everything that you are supposed to fulfill in the course of justice, then. you have the right to a personal conviction, it is very developed. you have the right to put it as the basis for making any decision. that is , it is something they accomplished in the course. here is the justice process. sorry, then your personal assessment and personal conviction. hmm can be found

unfounded by a higher court, as miscarriages of justice. they are, in principle, possible today, and if this is the criterion for the quality of justice, for this a system of implementing courts has been created in order to maximally exclude possible judicial errors for this, and some procedure for the entry into force of laws in destruction is observed, so that at some stage they are superior here. we will correct these mistakes. well, here is the maximum task for everyone, to reduce them to a minimum and correct them in time. here is the whole system of courts, it is just built in such a way that each higher court checks from everyone who has general vision, then the decision, which was lower by the standing court up to 2% in general , the annulment of judgments. we have nothing to do with it. this is the process of selling them there well, because we look at the complexity of justice of one or another , we judge the specialization of a judge in specific areas of justice and evaluate the quality of the work of a judge in the aggregate updating the basic law of the country we know that

it is planned to elect judges of the supreme court in a public format. and will it give an additional guarantee of their independence and impartiality. here, do you think if to talk about those constitutional changes that took place directly. of course, we did not expect them very much. we were very much looking forward to them, because they fixed at the constitutional level the type of provisions that were adopted in the course of the reform of the judiciary. let's say the status of the supreme court has fundamentally changed. it has already changed in essence since the fourteenth year, when the supreme court assumed the functions of the ministry of justice for, say, judicial administration and judicial support for all types of activities. he took on additional the function of organizing justice and of course, here is the fourteenth year. this is the period when the supreme court, having received these additional functions, assumed a very high degree of responsibility, when it began to essentially head the entire judicial

system of courts of general jurisdiction. and, of course, this had to be enshrined at a fairly high legislative level, and the fact that article 112 note today, the constitutional status of the supreme court is enshrined in our constitution. i'm fundamentally important. this is the first time in history, by the way, done and we answer very proud. well, the fact that we have the supreme court today has received such a high status not only as a body headed by the judicial system of courts throughout the jurisdiction, but also as a body of justice for civil criminal administrative cases. that is , today he combines the idea of ​​the most important functions of the function of pure justice, as an organ of justice and organs, as they still provide a functional system of su. general people are quite problematic and difficult, because to understand 157 courts of almost 5,000 workers and you need to make sure that every day there is everything is very sufficient all kinds of security, where they make our conditions about 4.000

decision. and now it's all in the supreme court today. well, the fact that he will be elected a judge of the supreme court, she was going to be dismissed when the native assembly here at such a high forum is publicly open, when we understand the degree of responsibility that we have, this is not only the election, but also the release in general from the belarusian, probably assembly, that is, the supreme court received from a higher constitutional status. you you know, if we talk about the constitutional consolidation of the entire belarusian people's assembly, let's say this is also, in general, an idea that was nurtured and suggested it happened a long time ago that i took part in all six belarusian people's assemblies, and at the first people's assembly i even spoke as a future minister justice substantiated the need. here is such a forum. eh, and, of course, even then it was clear that, uh, this is very effective, and the form, but it is

necessary just in such extreme situations, in such emergency situations, maybe in life of each side that it was not fixed. it is, so to speak, necessarily at the constitutional level. it probably needed to be asked. this was a necessary modern judge of the supreme court, what kind of person is this, in short, this is certainly the best judge in the country, a judge who is recognized by the dei community in the case of authoritative judges not only as high professionals, but also as an example of compliance with the judicial code of honor and judges. that is, this hmm is really a judge who has reached his maximum childish career, who has gone through all the stages of judicial work that are perceived. in the children’s community, it’s really better than our golden fund, let’s say there are few of them in the judicial community, by the way, but these are people who really are such a symbol, maybe our belarusian justice, for

whom the profession of a judge is not just a profession. and this is a way of life, it can even be. excuse the ussr, the state of some kind of soul, even one that they don’t represent all the time, otherwise, here’s how to be fulfilled. here is your public professional duty. he is in such a high level, therefore, the judges of the supreme court are proud of this title, they cherish this evocation of a piece of history of 100 years. and how do you see the future of the judicial system cannot stop for more than one day in its development and improvement, and therefore the main task. here , in the coming period, they can master themselves the legislative novels and those changes that will be in the judicial systems, well, as much as possible, and achieve efficiency and continue to move on. speaking, in principle, as a task we set ourselves this will make our judiciary so you know modern, efficient, economical and perceived by society, that is, with a high

level of trust in its society. that's just with the application of the text of fair judicial verdicts, which you asked how to achieve this. we have such a program of our own that works perfect. no, this is achieved in three directions. the first is the efficiency of justice. this is digitization to the rescue. these are not only sales figures, but this is just a reduction in fate. this is care. it's some redundant outdated litigation procedures. it's digitization, really. this, maybe even you know, is the one window that many people talk about and dream about, which should also be in the judiciary. here is one window for me in the judicial system. this is when each dispute is considered in preliminary and judicial and one judicial trial. here, if that's the case, then this is it. an ambulance court that performs its functions. if we talk about the quality of justice, then, of course, here, first of all, it is connected with the stability of the legislator with an increase in the quality of legal education

and the quality of the judiciary. i think this is a reasonable specialization of a judge in various branches of law. this is an analysis of judicial practice in a professionally balanced way; this may be a decrease in the conflict content of our justice ; restoration may be more conciliatory tendencies in our justice. that is, this is such a very difficult task, it is important today in order to expand the possibilities of belarusian justice, reducing its conflict. well, of course, here is reasonable uh, a combination of measures, criminal liability is also such an optimization, this is all connected with the quality of you. well, and finally the third task to do in the morning for everyone. although everything here is synonymous with justice, that is, equal means, in general, fair, the main thing is still. litigation is people's trust, because any trial begins with the issue of trust in the court. now, if there is such trust in society, then we can assume that the court is fulfilling its tasks that are assigned to it, of course, this is

the openness of processes and judicial embellishments. this is the development of publicity. we are all ours today court decisions are placed on the right portals. that is, they are open to society. here is the task to make the decision-making procedure itself understandable and open to people for society. so, when we complete these, maybe three such single tasks. well, in principle, let's assume that there we managed to create, uh, a modern judicial system, an effective judicial system and the supreme court, standing at the head of this system, what is in this in the whole context for you personally? question number one is to really make people perceive our judgment. how are you you know, this is the body where you can go to protect your rights? so they weren't afraid, were they? they went to court, as you know, well, compare with the clinic. yes, when heavenly necessity and went to court for advice, so that the judge and the court would become such a trustee or people who