[000:02:56;00] andrey vladimirovich svinykh, chairman of the commission on international affairs of the house of representatives of the national assembly of the republic of belarus, today i would like to discuss the trends in the international situation, and how this affects the development and well-being of the republic of belarus and andrei suvinykh is our guest today. good afternoon. andrei vladimirovich good afternoon. hello in turbulent times. we live andrey vladimirovich the ministry of foreign affairs of our countries recently made a statement in belarus seriously fears the aggressive actions of the polish leadership. let 's listen to the finances of the extremists, they are preparing

some kind of fighting squads against the belarusian population, carrying out active militarization. after all, this is obvious and well-known facts, while the actions of the current government are sometimes fanatical and do not differ in logic and rationality. and therefore, it is not always predictable enough to take at least the closure of checkpoints at the border to the detriment of their own population and political business department. also recalled that recently the council of ministers. poland made a decision. they are the implementation of the provisions of the treaty on conventional forces in europe in relation to our country , the polish government quite deliberately destroys the last legal pillars of the european security system, mines the whole of europe, the diplomat added. how likely is it that more will decide on some kind of military action against belarus no, if you paid attention, the emphasis was more on anti-belarusian e, such actions terrorist-oriented, they

finance, uh, certain forces. uh, preparing terrorist groups on their territory. and i am more skeptical about poland's readiness to act against belarus, if only because of the defense policy that has been formed in the republic of belarus over the past decade. the defense policy of the union state of the union state of russia belarus an attack on belarus will mean an attack on russia including, but nevertheless, we are also making a certain effort aimed at just to prevent any aggressive plans in particular. such a measure is the creation of a joint military group, which is now operating on the territory

of belarus, eh . e some rash actions on the part of poland, it certainly remains. why because the polish leadership today and, in principle, this statement was also made, it does not implement the interests of its own country, the non-interests of the national state, but it acts on the agenda foreign centers of power for ocean centers of power, which by and large use poland as a battering ram against. russia, first of all, in order to prevent the formation of a full-fledged macro-region on our territory on our joint territory. therefore, yes, there is no doubt that there is tension, but this is not a reason to lose one's head or panic. well, what about the buildup. hmm, the number of military personnel to

300,000, this is almost twice what it is now, uh, new american military bases are appearing in the same place on the territory. poland to announce an increase to 300,000, of course, it can be much more difficult to realize this task, since you need to think about where to get resources, and today these resources are promised by the united states to great britain well, whether they will fulfill their promises is a big question, i absolutely agree that the increase nato grouping on the territory of our border. and i think that it is already known that it reached, in my opinion, 40,000 people, and it is important to consider that these units e have offensive weapons, tanks, heavy artillery and a lot of other uh, armed systems of military systems. eh, nonetheless. we give an answer. and i think that even the announcement of the deployment of tactical nuclear weapons in belarus is

, in fact, a measure that completely nullifies any. uh, plans to build up strike forces along our borders. that is, they will no longer be able to perform any combat mission, but security. we must take into account. it's not a matter of trust. security is a formula. which allows both parties to, uh, have a certain amount of confidence in that they can protect their interests. this is a very important and very serious issue . the most dangerous thing in all this is poland's refusal to comply with the treaty on the limitation of conventional arms in europe in essence. they are undermining the foundation of the osce foundation, which, by and large, since the forty -fifth year has ensured peace, and well-being on the european continent. this is a really

dangerous step. and if andrei vladimirovich they stop using poland as a battering ram. can we expect that in the shortest possible time terms we will be able to restore neighborly relations with poland what do you think is the issue of the shortest possible time? this, of course, is a rather complicated question, but if we say so, it is an external force. they will stop putting pressure on the polish leadership, which, as i said, is not playing in the interests of poland. i think the situation will fundamentally change. e , moreover, most likely this process will be accompanied by a serious financial crisis, in which the whole of europe will find itself. well , in this case, i mean the european union and in general, all the countries of the collective west yes certainly finding themselves in a difficult position searching for, well, a kind of compromise that will need to be reached

just the same on our side, when i say our side. i mean both belarus and russia, and in general victor the hellish minister of defense said about the possibility of times. on our territory, not only tactical, but also strategic nuclear weapons, we will listen to the prepared equipment of this aircraft, which are here to carry nuclear ammunition. we have trained pilots. we received the most modern iskander complex, which is capable of using missiles with nuclear warheads. literally next week. uh, the training of this unit is nearing completion. we didn’t hear one more thing that our president said, that we will need strategic nuclear weapons, and we are already preparing. we have existing sites, but from these words

we can only understand that the threat is growing. yes, not quite here it is very clear to listen. uh, the content of these words and this phrase, if need to. yes, the minister of defense quite clearly expressed one thought that we are ready to deploy nuclear weapons, well, first of all, tactical ones, which will be fully provided. safe use of storage of this weapon. eh, that's the main question next. he outlined another very interesting point. it is more of a preventative nature. it is just the same aimed at cooling the hot heads on the other side. he says that if necessary, quoting the president, then strategic weapons may also appear in belarus. this he says intent, er, and the second point. this suggests that we will be able to handle this weapon quite well. that is, it is

essentially a warning. we must not forget that nuclear weapons are first and foremost a deterrent and it is thanks to them that we did not have a hot global war. uh, for more than 80 years, the appearance of such weapons in belarus completely excludes any, uh, rash actions against our country on the military track. the emergence of strategic nuclear weapons shows that we are ready to defend our interests as far as needed. well, even china i would like to discuss revised with you. china has its own rules for military conscription in wartime from 1. may the amendment comes into force. and so recruiting should be focused on preparing for war, that is, after all. uh, china is also preparing for some kind of military confrontation. well, we live in a very difficult time of conflict, china is now systematically trying to systematically draw

china into an armed conflict around taiwan, this is not necessary, but efforts. as i see , really titanic and we must remember that the peacetime army is one thing, the peacetime generals are one thing, the effective coordinated action of the armed forces is completely different. at the moment of the direct military clash, the situation in syria in ukraine, they clearly showed how big the difference can be. eh, you need to be prepared for this. uh, china has no combat experience. it is not enough for them to produce modern weapons to arm the army. it is also necessary to train the army to use this, it is necessary to create mechanisms that will allow cases of conflict to increase the size of the army and practice. he says that none of these processes are carried out without problems. that's

why china naturally analyzes every detail of everyone in conflicts around the world. e, he tries to take measures in advance to be fully armed, but this does not mean that he is aggressive all the time preparing the same. yes, it also takes time. this is not a month, not two, and not even a year, of course, china is now in an interesting time situation. uh, economic time works to his advantage. that is , simply doing nothing, continuing the course for preservation of global peace. china is strengthening its position in the world, and its opponents in this case, the united states of america. well , once again, strangely, the collective west is running out of time because the resources that they have are getting smaller and smaller and therefore a more acute form of conflict. and for china now it is important not to succumb to the provocation , of course, just as, in fact, as it is

for us. we are meeting with you in the year of peace and creation. andrey vladimirovich, we offer every effort to maintain calmness and head cold, but the situation in the world. you are right. it is getting hotter recently in sudan, and such foci have flared up. apparently, there will be more of these all over the world. yes, we just have time to observe where and when the next time. i think hmm the number of local conflicts. e will e, you can even say on a systematic basis in africa in southeast asia along the perimeter of russian borders. uh, latin america uh, really the world is explosive. why is this happening? the thing is that the unipolar world is the world of the hegemony of the united states of america a world of total domination? the countries of the collective west, which in principle

was unfair, which was built on the principle of draining resources and periphery countries from developing countries in favor of a very, very small number. uh, the beneficiaries of the western primarily transnational corporations. this world is collapsing, and it cannot collapse without exposing certain contradictions in the regions and the second moment. we must also be quite frank about this. e, the former outgoing hegemon, creates chaos, around the world creates conflicts, because these conflicts allow him to save at least part of e resources that are at his disposal and allow. uh, leaving the collapse of the global world to make it less painful is the main logic that hides behind all kinds of local conflicts. for whatever reason they did not arise, well, often the united states is satisfied with finding a reason for this oil in some country and uh, well

, some other energy resources. here, uh, an example, there is venezuela, the long-term confrontation of the united states is constantly trying to get something from venezuela, and recently a member the us state department threatened in venezuela with tougher sanctions if the dialogue of local authorities with non-systemic opposition. uh, stagnation and nicolas maduro responded to this conclusion. let's see yesterday representative gringo made threats against venezuela said that if venezuela does not make progress in the political dialogue with the corrupt treacherous selling sector of the unitary platform that they will take retaliatory measures and sanctions against our country. i tell gringo press secretary get the hell out formula italy emotionally emotionally spoke out. well, that is absolutely correct. it seems to me that the statement of the state department is more. yes, even hysterical. they applied against venezuela almost the entire arsenal of restrictive measures that could

be done, in fact. almost the same as against russia. they confiscated more than 20 billion dollars of the gold and foreign exchange reserves of this country, but they created chaos there, and the most curious thing is that after going through these tests, venezuela just this year , at the end of last year, goes back to stabilization goes to economic growth, but there is another interesting aspect. i noticed that in the elections in latin america, almost all countries, including mexico, came. uh, left-wing socialists, many of whom are very, very unfriendly to the united states, they remember what the united states did in latin america in the middle of the 20th century, how they destroyed the national liberation movement. uh, the political parties that were

focused on the development of these countries, imposing their own hegemony. and so now we have some kind of backlash. latin america is pulling together and venezuela is at the forefront of this process. well, it's interesting that they don't feel these same gringos of this danger that comes from yes of the new system, which, according to you, is being created even in latin america. they could , well, pretend to be at least socialists for a while. such a good expression. that a leopard never loses its spots. this is the first and second point. they, i think, they perfectly understand everything from here and arise. here it's tension. they also understand that they have two such really serious global weapons left, and they are demonizing their, in fact, their opponents. house of representatives of the national assembly andrei savinykh will talk about

the most burning topic foreign fs claims that by the end of the year the west will force zelensky to sit down at the negotiating table, and he will sign an unfavorable agreement due to the west’s unwillingness to support the conflict. do you agree that this is the probability scenario of practical psychology. there is one. uh, technique called choice without choice, right? well, for example, mom can tell her son when you will do your homework now or in an hour, yes, that is, he can choose only the time, but you should always do homework. here, exactly the same attempt is made to impose a negotiation process, and implicitly. there are several manipulations hidden at once. uh, well, let's take it literally by uh, parts of the agreement on favorable terms for ukraine. yes, which means favorable conditions for ukraine, by and large

, russia's position has been voiced. uh, victory russia can mean the most favorable conditions for the preservation of both ukrainian statehood and, in general, ukraine as a territory, as a people, but the problem is that if this happens, then russia will not agree with zelensky. the second question is, why is zelensky's proposed government being done? here is the admission. e that it will be preserved, this is an extremely difficult question. uh, will this really happen most likely a and third point. e in this phrase, the zelensky government is presented as an independent e, the subject of e international relations, but we all know very well that they are not subjects, and the tool turns out that the solution of the problem in ukraine is,

in fact, russia’s negotiations with the countries of the collective west on certain conditions for the return of a peaceful situation, right, so it turns out that this is a complete phrase designed to divert and impose e on society, well, separate, by the way, the expert is there. a mental picture that essentially does not correspond to the interests of russia and does not correspond to reality. that's all. well, i'm so interested i understand zelensky's office in my opinion. now the only interest is to cut the western aid that is still coming to ukraine as soon as this process is completed. they will simply run away from this country, that's all, and it meets the interests of ukraine in the first place. completing

the military operation as quickly as possible on russia's terms , because i see no other way to resolve this problem and reach agreements between russia and the collective west, both on certain conditions of peaceful coexistence, that is, a peaceful transition. e to this multipolar world, which we are talking about more and more today, like this, if this conflict is presented. yes, the strategy is becoming more or less clear, but i agree that it really contains a rational assessment that all these processes will take place. committed before the end of this year, it is likely that it is here. this is a very likely scenario. and i can even say that from a purely military point of view, from the point of view of the situation on the battlefield. uh, russia can complete this operation much faster than the end of this year, another question is that

the settlement of it includes not only a military aspect, but also a humanitarian economic one, and most importantly, a geopolitical one, and it slows down this geopolitical aspect. uh, appeasing the solution to this problem, the rhetoric of french president macron changed after a trip to china after a visit to china, he made a number of statements , including that europe should move away from dependence on the united states. what does it mean in your opinion? here is such a rebellious european ship, well frankly speaking of which, i can point out a few of these interesting points here, indeed the interests of the united states and great britain and the interests of continental europe, they differ, the problem is that continental europe has no subjectivity, they are not completely sovereign and incapable

of accepting. uh, well, on their own to decide their own interests, no matter how strange it may sound western europe would like to enter into some kind of cooperation with china, but the united states of america will not allow it. just as they did not allow western europe continue normal interaction with russia, most likely, they will be hostages. e this geopolitical fault and the process of deindustrialization of europe will continue. this is the task that the macron solves, and it’s hard to say in contacts in china. it is quite possible that he really expresses a certain thesis, which is already on the lips of a very large number of political leaders or political circles in continental europe , and on the other hand, knowing his history, they know,

that he belongs. uh, let's say global financial circles is, in fact, their employees and it is likely that he simply serves the interests of french corporations. who would like to move to china to maintain their economic potential and make statements that they think are flattering to xi and china as a whole. it simply provides more favorable conditions for the transfer of france's industry to china or, relatively speaking, to the zones that china controls, so the second option seems to me, it seems more and very likely, but this once again suggests that the collapse of continental europe has already gone very far to stop this process is almost impossible. and that already , in general, the highest players that are there are already starting to simply run away from this ship. this is very sad,

because i frankly do not say this with joy. i say this with great regret, because europe has really grown up. uh-huh and by itself this is the structure of the eu the european union, it will remain or you you still think that now they will be one at a time, at least they can leave this association, but de facto, in that content, to say that they will have to seriously reorganize inside. i don't know how else to. to name the memory will not help the settlement to think about, which the chairman of the national council of austria wolfgang proposes on saturday, the amazing endurance then noted andrey vladimirovich not a single muscle. well, it's common practice. that is, if we have something to say, we must say it without being distracted by details. here

these sites. of course, they fell a lot in our eyes, because there is a circus going on there, stop it, in general, negotiate with someone. no, you understand one very important trend. in my opinion. we very often say that it does not work in a crisis, the way we wanted it, the thing is that there are so many international ones. ah, institutions of organization. they were created in completely different conditions. it was a bipolar world, and then they ensured the interests of the two superpowers of the ussr and the usa and within their framework. we have achieved a lot. good e results that were generally directed in the interests of human development. ah, but the framework still existed now, when we see the collapse of globalization, these institutions simply stop working, because they were created in other conditions, and they are now falling victim to conflicts. uh,

member states, if member states can't agree, how can institutions work. let's even take the regional example of the osce, it is an organization created around the treaty on energy in these arms control in europe, if poland is now withdrawing from this treaty, if its main key provisions are not being implemented, if the main principle is violated - you cannot ensure your own security at the expense of the security of your neighbor, then how can the osce act. well hello actual fiction. at the same time, they do not dissolve all these structures. they continue to work. this is a reflection of another different logic. the thing is that history never puts an end to it , there is always a continuation. uh, a period of conflict

will always end in necessity agree. strictly speaking, this was the initiative of the president of belarus to hold an international conference, when the leading states should sit down at the table and agree on new principles, er, of the world order of the already multipolar world . this initiative was ahead of its time, well, by five to seven years, because today we are going through a period, just the same, tearing apart a period of conflict, that is, the parties are now trying to find their zones of influence, measure their potentials, and only then the time will come. therefore, there is no point in negotiating to destroy these organizations. it makes sense to continue to work in them to convey your position, since they will eventually become the basis, within which new agreements will be reached. you say the world is changing. what kind of world are we building?

this is very interesting. uh, i would say even a matter of principle, because we declare very often. we are in favor of a multipolar world, but we talk little about what this means, and how does this affect the economy? how does this affect questions? security? yes, all these issues need to be discussed in detail, because if we do not understand this, then, well, honestly, in any case, we will not know. what is their government doing? and that and that's probably not great. this is a multipolar world, i see how the world and macro-regional macro-regions are political military economic unions of sovereign states that unite with each other in order to create their own market, ensure a unified defense policy, and, by and large, to get through this difficult period and save their chances of

development and a prosperous future. and i want to say that such macro-regions are considered in the world. not so much. well, let's keep our fingers crossed, but without a doubt there is a chance china has a chance india russia the united states of america and the united states of america there , uh, in a fight two social forces at once, uh, forces are a cluster of transnational financial corporations, uh, which are now the government of the united states of america controls uh, not the government controls the cluster, but the cool dogs. yes, that is here these are representatives of the real sector who would like to return. uh, the former industrial power of the united states of america is two mutually exclusive projects

. great britain is making great efforts to survive at least as some kind of macro-region, uh, trying to ensure its influence. and in the middle east, somewhere in india, somewhere, by the way, in central europe it is quite possible that the eu, which will receive a blow from the anglo-saxon world, will become a zone of influence of great britain, but these are scenarios that we can consider as a probability, but in there is someone in latin america brazil is now trying to use primarily brix e as a tool for consolidation latin america has a chance to form its own macro-region, but they clearly do not have enough resources, they have too little unity, and they have no military potential. here is your question, by the way, brings you know what an interesting thesis? and what qualities should a macro-region have in order to take place, the thing is that now everyone

who tries to create it immediately implements two strategies. one strategy is aimed at consolidating the space that is available to it, and the second strategy is aimed at breaking through the possibility of other players to create their own macro-regions. from here, it turns out, look, the united states of america is implementing plans for, uh, creating an aukus. yes, and at the same time they are escalating uh, the conflict over taiwan for china for india is relations with pakistan and the situation around kashmir. and so the list could go on. eh, it turns out that each macro-region should be. uh, a union of states that are at least, well 200 300 400 million industrial population. this is a single market. e, at the same time, the parameters of military security, resource security must be maintained. we must have enough

resources to ensure the development of our economy, a certain level of development of human capital, the education system and the scientific school. why because without e-e of its independent scientific school , the macro-region will not be able to develop and, finally , technological security, we must create all critically important technologies. uh, at home, that goes for and microelectronics and computer equipment and road construction equipment from tank buildings and many more. that is , those macro-regions or those countries that are able to rally a sufficient number of countries around themselves and provide these parameters. er, they will emerge as new players in the international arena. and by the way, they will sit at the negotiating table. uh, within the framework of that conference, about which i spoke about the president of belarus

, the potential will happen, whenever you like, andrey vladimirovich, i am for the first time in your company with well some kind of positive, or something, looked at the year that we experienced, but this is also bad. yes , what is happening is that people are dying, but it was also such a test for the capacities of the region, so to speak, yes, about which you are talking about no doubt. we have passed a very important critical year, in fact. russia is now fighting in ukraine for the right. we all need to create our own macro-region. and we need to understand this. the second point is that you are sts, er, in fact. we already and russia and belarus we did not allow uh, to rob ourselves by the second time we, in fact, said no, and we are the first to break out of that globalization from that global system that is

collapsing. this means that the destruction of the system will already hit us much less than the nu countries. an effective west than even in china, by the way, and india. and this macro-region, which is being built by russia, is clear that we will also be present in it. who else comes first. let's talk about belarus it because the status of belarus is uh more important to us right. i think we have a chance not just enter the macro-region, but enter the core of the future macro-region. this is extremely important, because this is integration, which is being laid both within the framework of twenty-eight allied programs and within the framework of defense policy. these are the standards that will then be open to other countries to join, but each newcomer will probably have a worse condition. eh, the original club let there be no bad conditions, but

nevertheless it is the first one that can enter, but without a doubt these are the countries, er, the former ussr are traditional partners with whom we have a high degree of connection. there is a logistical connection and there is a certain idea of ​​the values ​​of common values. well, then continue. well, i can probably already safely name iran among these countries , which is now very quickly accelerating the processes of integration with russia and belarus and potentially becoming part of this new macro-region. we do not say that it will be one country. it will be a single space that will function on the same topics the same law on the basis of the same principles and values. i admit that further more complex assumptions are already beginning, which

are related to the dynamics of the development of the situation around the world, it may turn out here, turkey may turn out to be the balkans well, by and large , a decent part of central europe about the macroregion. we will continue the conversation. uh, in the next part of our program, let's pause for a while. after that, we will return to this studio again, while subscribe to our telegram channel. that's what it's called. say no shut up. leave your comments. offer us guests, and look for all our releases on the youtube-channel, belarus alone and on the website of the belterodiocompany. gourmet cuisine from the master of meat preparations is now taking place in our process here. here's an example of cooking overlay sauce sauce applied to our pork ribs in three steps. that is, look. what an edge here

, the whole product we have is selected, see a person who built a business from scratch in the restaurant industry, a chef restaurateur and a simple family man leonid makdaulov. i love real meat is proper meat. i eat it. have with him. i work and prepare it for everyone. from the same i advise and wish. that's all, so eating meat will be power. there will be health. watch today on our channel. before they go on a trip, they don't pack their bags, but earn hints by answering tricky questions. so, as always, three clues in exchange for three correct answers to three questions. what kind of bird is a monument erected in baranavichy? birds not sheep stork no small sparrow bird, right? yes them the task is not just to tell about the secrets and

legends of the area, but to check them personally, do not be surprised. i am near the village of vylazy , for example, 20 km from pinsk. and here i am in order to find the royal well. so it seems that there is still some kind of open door interesting to me here and they said, go enjoy it. well, let's go every trip, it's an exciting quest. and immersion in the color of a separate belarusian city. why such a name? because the bun has the shape of a boat just like that nowhere else, see the project stone, scissors the paper on the tv channel is white. on the air again say be quiet, and we have a guest and a deputy of the house of representatives andrey savinykh andrey

vladimirovich in the macroregions. eh, you say there will be several such regions. there may be three, there may be five, there may even be six, but inevitably, uh, such a situation may arise that someone wants to dominate to break out, forward, how then to achieve peace in such a situation, balance, how do you keep while running ahead, because we still need to form a regroup woman mentally. yes, this process will be carried out along several lines at once. first, macro-regional will be formed. as you rightly said, five or six will still exist. at first, regional powers that will pursue a joint policy and balance between macro-regions, but in the end, any mathematician will say. what do you think, uh, the system that has three

points of support is best stable, not four conventionally, but three, uh, this will mean that if one leader appears in the world , then, uh, let's say, two other leaders, two other player will. it is natural to combine with each other to balance. and its possibilities. this is called the balance of power. by the way, i would like to draw your attention to what russia's new foreign policy doctrine, er, this one, the principle of the balance of power, er, does. e, probably, one of the main e for the future for the development of international relations from the point of view of russia , i think it is no coincidence that this means that even if there are 5-6 macro-regions, i suspect that everything will come down to two, or rather, three unions. which two will balance, uh any a leader who will try to get ahead in a paradoxical way. this system

can be very stable. it will be a balance of power. ah, the balance of common sense. it will be a kind of repetition of this quite prosperous period. eh, the existence of two superpowers, the macro-region will have its own economic model, e choose this is the next very difficult question. uh, the point is that it is obvious that the cluster of transnational corporations will try to implement models of inclusive capitalism. it will be a kind of feudalism uh neo-officialism in the territory, well, a certain territory in the world. e. i think that in our situation we will most likely implement the welfare state model. google is one economy, where a large state corporation will be responsible for development, and, uh,

public services will be entrusted to a small private enterprise, that is, this kind of multi-structural economy will combine the benefits of a market system. with scheduling capabilities. uh, maybe, uh, we have, without a doubt , socialism with chinese characteristics. yes we have there is a caste society and a market economy in india. i think that there will be three or four models that will start to compete with each other and this will give no doubt good impetus for development. why because the world is diverse? eh, the rivalry of the model and ultimately allows you to find the best path for the development of all mankind. this is where we need to go beyond. the system as a whole now what is stopping us? well, as if uniting with china will

never happen in one macro-region. well, frankly, uh, i don't believe in these associations, because the logic of the formation of macro-regions. e, says what will be let's say 5-6. such are the centers. yes, why should we unite with china, which itself is already quite large, if we have the opportunity to create our own macro-region, right? uh, the second question, does china need it? this is also a point that needs more serious study. i'm talking here, so far very carefully. why because for the next five, maybe even more years , china will undoubtedly be our strategic ally, because the collapse globalization and the transition to a much polar world also meets its interests, including, but unification into a single macro-region. i don't think it will happen. but there will be no conflict in the world , often there is a statement that the whole world

supports the united states the whole world against russia and supports the united states at the same time in ghana they do not think so. here is the speaker of the parliament of ghana albanbek. ben explained kamolikharis, uh , to the vice president of the united states what is democracy in response to her criticism of the anti-gbt law they will ask how she did it yesterday these presidents?

hello well, actually, it's not all. yes , it turns out that they support the fact that the whole world supports the united states - this is a great lie that is absolutely untrue. uh, as a matter of fact, uh, a magazine economist recently analyzed. uh, this alignment of forces, they came to the conclusion that, uh, the united states. well, or rather the course. uh, the west supports a maximum of 50 55 states. these are mainly either the countries of the collective west themselves or countries that are entirely and completely financially dependent on them and do not can e demonstrate, e, an independent foreign policy and that's all, that's all the other countries. well 12. uh, now uh, actively oppose this course, and all the other countries are over 125,130 somewhere.

that's about it, they all, uh, secretly want success with china's russia, but are afraid to take a more proactive policy, but they refuse to condemn, they make these kinds of statements that, in principle, uh, climb unheard for another 10-15 years. yeah, where is ghana and where is the united states of america, yes, nevertheless. this is the process that shows how critical. eh, the total majority of humanity also relates to the globalization that was created by the united states of america. and, even more so, to the process of destruction that is happening now, they all , uh, begin to slowly block around brix around the osians, another question. what they are doing so far is cautious, but as the global world is destroyed, their position will grow and sound more and more, and this is

what the united states is very worried about. that is why they are implementing these information campaigns in order to convince themselves and everyone surrounding that the whole world, supposedly their support is another matter that they are trying to keep in a certain. uh, the field of ignorance of the population of their countries, they need an obedient population, a population that will not rebel. u u go to demonstrations, so they create this illusion that they are winning, especially since they have u reasons to be afraid. look at what's happening in france look at the mass strikes. uh, the uk in holland in greece everywhere in literally all countries. and that's just flowers berries ahead, yes, andrey vladimirovich, this is true, because three years ago, when we met in this studio for the first time, it seemed to us that you were telling

some helmets yes from a very distant future. and today, when it becomes so tangible, we are pleased to hear from you once again and when we invited you. we said, let andrei vladimirovich come and tell us how we will live on, which, in fact, you did to satisfy our curiosity. huge to you. thank you for today's conversation. thank you for talking. a we tatyana shcherbina victoria popova say goodbye to you today. goodbye. goodbye. and now andrei savinykh is speaking. we live in a very difficult historical time. this time is fast, if earlier it took decades for the events that are now taking place in a year, then we constantly see how the historical process is accelerating and changes are starting to grow back half. i think that is why in his message the president of belarus indicated that

never before? yes , there was no threat to the sovereignty and independence of the republic of belarus such are obvious, and he outlined those key conditions that will allow us to successfully pass this period. this is the unity of our society. this is an efficient economy. this is the memory of their values ​​and their traditions and much more. i would like to say that these are all the qualities, all the parameters that the belarusian society will certainly need to ensure its

chance for a brighter future. hard training and exciting competition i struggle roughly talking to myself in training by numbers, i look, i analyze, i am satisfied with the past competitions to finish and show , we have creative guys who can and who can play decent football at a good level, but in order for them to do this, they need time to show the results , well, the heart rejoice, honestly and interesting matches

meet regularly. in the nhl championship, we have leaders with the regular season this season, right? with the performance for the national teams played 75 games 75 tigers, plus this is what they have now left for their clubs and play. that is, they will release somewhere around 80 games , and see people and events from the world of sports in projects on the belarus 24 tv channel. famous belarusian landscape painters from vitaly sverko da hyacinth alkhimovich, and who else stood at the origins of the belarusian school of landscape and what facts about this understandable genre of art will surprise you at the belarusian school of landscape, watch this weekend in the fashion for

culture project only on our tv channel.

porsche hosted by international economic forum products are presented by fifty industrial enterprises of the union state of the participants and china in the german railway demanding