today rests against the ukrainian front, large-scale exercises defender 23 experts have started with one voice. they say, expect provocations around transnistria, crimea and belarus, and such information appears the other day, the newspaper lemon reports france refused to help ukraine with planning combat missions on the territory of belarus kiev requested a digital map of belarus in paris, which would allow ukrainian aviation to fly over the country at ultra-low altitudes according to lemon. and i could plan a route in advance and departure, taking into account the terrain in france, said that they would not participate in ukraine's operations on the territory of other states. here is oleg sergeevich what do you think about this when you hear such plans of ukraine they perfectly understand that this threatens with very serious provocations, which can lead not just as an escalation

of the conflict in ukraine, but into drawing all of europe into this conflict, why did such a reaction macron. it would seem that europe lies with the united states of america of sovereignty, there are no all solutions that are accepted in the white house and europe salutes and fulfills, despite the fact that it actually hits its national interest in economic political issues of national security, but on the other hand, even there even there, despite the lack of sovereignty, there is understanding. what the escalation with belarus can lead to, after all , it will not be possible to draw belarus alone into the war , for example, the president spoke about this more than once in his message. if they are drawn in, belarus is drawn in all of europe, this is no longer a special, military the operation will already use all the forces and capabilities that the allied state of europe has and what europe understands this will lead to, but i see that you do not

question what the french newspaper reports. it does not mean that after that i am 100% sure of this, moreover , i am convinced that kiev is fulfilling the will of the united states. and what is the will of the united states to prolong the conflict as long as possible ? more blood should flow ukrainian resources. they run out we see now, what 's going on at the front? we see that the most combat-ready units of the armed forces, which prepared for many years just what is being ground by russian troops is a matter of time, what's next? how to support this conflict, how to make it break out, we need new countries, we need new victims, who they have the baltics, but this is only rhetoric, they don’t have a human resource, a lot of rhetoric, as the great three call them on the internet. lithuania latvia estonia causing laughter, which the poles can only bark, there is this time, but on the other hand. i would very much like to involve the dream, belarus was sent to them for this

always a policy to destroy our state from the inside, to make it here at the beginning of the civil war, and then i’ll throw all this at russia, after a while it didn’t work out. so it is necessary to provoke, therefore he claims that kiev has applied for such data not only to france, but to all the west. well, we see that, apparently , france has refused other silence. this suggests that exactly 100% of the baltic countries will relax, poland will give any. data that ukraine will request we understand this very well, and there is only one criterion here - which country has more sovereignty. she does not go for it, although france lies under the united states but still it is the founding country of the european union, like germany, it is the main country. there is a big big three, lithuania, look how interesting it turns out. hmm. that's what the zelensky regime is terrible now and why , uh, you have to discuss such information as we started with today with maximum

tension, and listen, because they have barbaric logic. here look what just recently said, an adviser to the head of zelensky's office is a podolak. he said that ukraine has the right to destroy everything that is in the crimea and donbass, it seems. wait all the time. shout that this is your land crimea donbass and you want to destroy everything surprisingly barbaric logic, which is being broadcast now, kiev officially. i think this is the logic of war in the first place. we should not take it that way, but still i would doubt that paris single-handedly made such a decision regarding the digital map of belarus. i think that it is correct, such an informational message is given with a simulated one. i would see two signals here , first of all, that the prevention of the spread of the conflict remains extremely important for the european union at the current stage and the position

of france - this was demonstrated, and the second very important signal is the firmness of the position. uh, and uh, the determination of the response from belarus is finally realized by the european elites, that's why this message is so wide. uh, circulated in the press. i think it is too no matter who you think. that's what kind of game france is playing right now. we see that what is m-m such a fickle, unstable in this regard, but a macron. here he goes to the biden and says, we are brothers in arms in the war for ukraine, he returns from beijing and says that now in europe there is no need to fight for taiwan at all, we should not follow the american format, then he says this. our task is to help ukraine survive. by all means. do not let russia win, do not allow the expansion of this conflict. that's what the game is and that's the most important thing, who's the game leads me with his hands. ah, i think that , uh, this situation, how it is related

to the fact that we evaluate solidarity a little from our point of view, because we are talking about solidarity because it could, when they have solidarity, yes, and we er, we see, it is only in our understanding and more in belarusian, but there are other options. there is a belarusian version, indeed, it is built, uh on the position uh. a union of like-minded people with a very high share of responsibility on a global scale. and there is another well-known for us. e point of view. this is us already we just express the tobacco, apart and in fact the macron demonstrates it today, but i would pay attention to one more thing that hides paris and the macron a lot, and in particular, but paris is today between three fires. these are the sanctions of the united states of america, these are retaliatory measures from china and russia, and without restraint. the protectionism that is spreading across europe is why all the actions of the macron are aimed at somehow

surviving this fight that is unfolding today. we have it in the information space, they don’t want to represent it yet, but it exists, and this is where all the subtleties of french foreign policy lie; we are talking about the survival of europe in general for today all, and not just france. and there are a huge number of problems in the european union and, in general, abritoric , macroru very often evaluated the internal audience , which must be shown at least something that he defends the national interests. the french, after all, everything that the macro says is actually discussed in europe, and so why are we helping ukraine, why are we supplying weapons? why do we need a war? take care of french problems, sort out, in the end , the mountains of garbage that lie in the city with migrants. nobody cares about the problem. only grows. well, there is one more aspect that i would like to mention. we should never again believe a word of what european politicians say, lest they tell us. we don't want escalation, we don't want war, we will never attack. we don't

want war with russia not to believe a single word. we must remember one simple thing - they will have the slightest opportunity to attack and destroy. they will know that there will be no answer, they will know that there will be nothing for them, just as there was nothing in yugoslavia for this in libya, there was nothing for this in syria in iraq, which means they will attack and destroy in the name of democracy and freedom and all belarusians who will die here. they'll say no big deal. this is for the great bright future, so not believing a single word is the only way to prevent war being strong, therefore the president is right, when now is over. all these years, especially the last year pays a huge amount of attention not in words to issues of national security and our military power, and i'm not afraid of this word, but in fact today we actually pushed the war aside. it was very simple that they pushed aside not by their rhetoric, nor by their promises, not by their words, but

by the fact that today our military potential has increased significantly, but after the deployment of tactical nuclear weapons. this step, uh, will push the war back for a long time, we'll discuss it, but that completes the topic of this one. as olga igorievna correctly said, solidarity is something what seems to us to be solidarity here in the west, apparently. it looks like the united states is outraged, and the fact that they broadcast to the general public and paris and brussels along with it. they say bytes during a telephone conversation, planted a macron for the post-beijing theses, but most clearly expressed this conflict with the president of the american foundation, heritage, kharitovich, fandeisha - this is the most influential factory of american thought. james krafan, the current trust magazine , published an article where he actually threatens it is time to reconsider the status of the united states as the leading donor of ukraine must be demanded from france others. partners of the report who and how helped kiev and until the eu reports, the us should not send

money to ukraine. so this is such an environment and a host. so the whole policy is shifted again and again. here is the notorious contour through and through that they cannot agree among themselves how they will divide further and because of this , too, but one more thing must be said, the americans are now destroying the european economy every month. they put her on a gas needle so they hooked the american one on an industrial needle. now many european enterprises are moving to other countries. many are striving, including in the united states. that is, today they have hooked europe on themselves, that is , the economic sovereignty of europe has been lost, respectively, such statements can be made to frighten europe because, like ukraine , let's not dream up, but think about the further development of the situation. today there is no ukraine. as a state, because it is completely dependent on western aid, will there be or europe after some time? i don't

i'm talking about now, if such a policy continues, what will happen to the european economy in 5 years, in 6 years of sanctions , in 6 years of complete dependence on america, what will happen to it? i'm afraid that germany, uh, france will not be pulled out on itself. do they really not understand this burden of europe? it's all now whether they give them independence. well, look, there is a statement from here. we see that, on the one hand, the united states is saying in plain text to its partners there, in the asian region, in south korea, first of all, reduce the supply of microchips, not trading with china, this is 300 billion dollars of turnover between south korea and china and the same thing, they say now to the european union and all trade with europe, china has how much 850 billion dollars there , you can understand why they do not want to burn bridges. and why such it would seem large? state powers are economically so powerless. that's true, how is your salon? well, i would not say completely

vassal positions of europe, of course, they exist, but the only thing that they relaxed with forty fifth year and are accustomed to receiving this kind of subsidies and living in such a stable world, but in the financial world, but what about what you said about. here are the editions of national intels , because this is the formula that trump once put forward. this was the first question after he came to power, which he asked her in europe, how long we will support you, then it’s time to invest in your security. and today it is already a question. e of ukraine and do they understand this in europe, of course, sensible european analysts from the very beginning conflict in ukraine, but they say that europe should go on its own track, and what the macron said, these are not just his words. but macron is forced to protect not only the interests of those he represents, but uh, he is the president of france so

he is limited, but i think there is an even more important undercurrent today, besides this fuss that we are seeing between the us and europe, after all, uh, the globalization that we have observed economic and interconnectedness and the transformation that it has spurred the economy into the political landscape. it has two sides. eh, what we see for the golden billion is enrichment and the second very important side. after all, the club of elite powers and those schemes that used to enrich the influence that were hidden. they have become available to a large number of states, and if earlier, and the countries of asia in the middle east watched the behavior of their partners, the united states and the european union, today they are asking european analysts a question. that mark they ask the question, uh connect.

the states of america and the european union have reached such heights due to their own potential, or have we allowed them to do it. and i am convinced that today the number of those who ask the second part of the question is already much larger than the number of countries that, uh, have expressed their desire. recently it was reported to join the brig in the most arab emirates saudi arabia many added across europe another very important point. why are we now talking about it, it is not a sovereign history. everything is just very it means, e in the ninety-first year, soviet troops left eastern europe, american nowhere. didn't leave. this is the first reason it all started with this, because the americans then took control of europe and wanted to take all the post-soviet space under control, and then russia missed the baltic states, missed ukraine, missed a number of other countries, we need to talk about this, and then the economy financial control. and who is the control? the largest enterprises in the european union where are the owners behind the ribbon in america next, and who

controls the elections in the european union? or we can now say that the americans do not interfere in european elections as much as they interfere, and in some countries , uh, such as poland, elections are key for them for the further development of europe, and elections in poland will be already now. the americans are interfering in them. biden's visit is already here. in warsaw, he was not only connected with ukraine, he was connected, including with pre-election poland, he clearly gave a signal. what kind of poland does the us need well, the president of poland picked up this slogan, saying more america in europe that's all politics. let's talk about safety. the story of britain's plans to deliver shells with combined uranium to ukraine, it seems, as a whole series was continued. the media published, e, the answer of the deputy minister of defense of great britain, james hippie, to a parliamentary inquiry , in which he makes it clear that, in fact, they have already supplied ukraine with about 2,000 shells for

challenge tanks, 2, among which there is also ammunition with combined uranium. moreover, when they started, well, on the contrary, apparently, to ask a question. but what about next with these shells, what about responsibility two most revealing quotes from the british undersecretary of defense he said for reasons of operational security. we will not comment on the indicators of the use of the supplied kits, and the second in the uk has no obligation to eliminate the consequences of the use of shells with combined uranium in ukraine, that is, with such friends, ukraine does not need scorched fields at all. i think such informational messages. they appear in connection with a widely advertised offensive a large counter-offensive of which is expected in april in may, that is, these deadlines in june are constantly postponed, and uh, this is such a heat on the information agenda, it must definitely be

today. these are irresponsible statements. they are just in order to create tension in belarus as well, because if we follow this whole chain, even because we discussed today. uh, this is clearly, as if traced, uh, and belarus, russia should prepare for a serious conflict, because a counteroffensive in the form that the information agenda is presented to us. it should be of the west, but destroying everything, that is, the situation will be completely reversed. uh, it’s natural that we are, as in the soviet era, as well as ahead of the cold war, we begin to reflex, that is, we, uh , are re-equipping, spending huge amounts of human resources and financial resources in order to resist what we don’t know it creates tension in society, because today work is going on on the one hand at the well front, and on the other parties and for the population, including the americans, when they threw a bomb into japan on

hiroshima nagasaki, just recently an american official stood in japan and was even afraid to say that it was the usa, yes, and he says , of course, this is a tragedy. and who is responsible for this tragedy, and who is responsible for mutilated iraqi children? what kind of shells were used in iraq, how many children after that were ill with oncological diseases? how many people yes how many people destroyed 1 million 200 iraqis died, who will take responsibility, so uh, this uk official do not lie to them do not care. who cares? how will europe be radioactively contaminated. but this will affect europe and not only ukraine, the wind will be different, therefore, of course. it's scary and different in a different way. how to win in russia today there is no sergeevich making a decision to deploy tactical nuclear weapons on our territory. this is a weapon of prudence not only deterrence, but prudence for those who hatch such plans in time to save europe from a big

war. they should be glad that we are today we are deploying tactical nuclear weapons. and why rejoice, because the americans who command europe will also think three times what command to give? do not touch this belarus, they will say one by one simple. the reason we're not here is sitting across the ocean. if a negative scenario suddenly starts, therefore we have never threatened anyone, everyone knows this very well. this is a lie that is being poured on belarus that we cannot but ask someone. in this case, here, of course, is such a significant date for us, hmm, another anniversary of the chernobyl tragedy. she always for the belarusian position it has always been a political topic. but this time they seem to have outdone themselves , they managed to connect this day on april 26 with the deployment of tactical nuclear weapons by belarus. here's how you listen to it. do you remember how they associated this day with the construction of a nuclear power plant. belarusian they have everything we do, for the country, for the state, for its security , for the development of the economy, everything is bad. at the same time

, everything that others do is good. lithuania is placing nuclear waste on the border with belarus. wonderful. poland will build a nuclear power plant. build, so lithuania will want to build; build, this is the politicization of the chernobyl theme. this use is solely for the purpose of pr, they do not care about this belarusian people, they do not care about these our polluted territories. they never went there, someone was lukashenka lukashenka since the beginning of the presidency. every year i went there without fear. i didn’t just go around defending programs, which means that when the supreme council was still strong, i remember when the authorities weren’t presidential. he then cursed with advice so that the money would go there, so that people would support this help. uh, affected region. this is real politics. this is the usual pr to walk around the center, minsk cleavage and the bell. rubbish would be removed. i remember on the main streets. eh, papers. we collected a rake, they would take it, and they are 30 years old, a bell,

disguised, a fool for a priest, and they go ringing with this bell, and then they turn the cars over. i remember my first chernobyl hat. i am a cadet of the academy of the ministry of internal affairs the anniversary of the chernobyl tragedy me without helmets without a helmet. send without anything. i didn’t know what it was, maybe there is a convoy. luna aunzo, overturns cars and us cadets, by the way, they themselves stood with me and in the army mikhailovich was then a cadet of the academy, edem we recently remembered and they throw stones at us. this is called to honor the memory of chernobyl. this is what you are doing so nothing has changed now. now they will walk. just the truth in the middle. warsaw doesn’t look like much that doesn’t pass through paris . arranged by the police. they will see. what is nuclear democracy and, uh, france, which is largely based on nuclear power plants, you don’t look like that. by the way, olga igorevna, oleg sergeevich raised an interesting thought that, indeed, it may be that the time has come when for us april 26

is not only a time of memory of this tragedy, but also a certain symbol of the revival of belarus in spite of in the name of here. contrary to all forecasts, then there is more labor allowed to revive these lands. although many did not believe that this was possible, especially in such a time frame and in the name of well, in the name of the present, in addition to the fact that children on those lands could live here, and we see that this was successful. that is, maybe it's really time to rebuild attitudes to this day, not to those events, but to this day. i think that it has already been rebuilt in belarus . i think that it is at the level of ordinary people. uh, that's what you're talking about, it's just connected with the future, not with the past with the events that were, but with the future, and for the information agenda , alekseevich absolutely agrees, the key word is nuclear everything, as if everything around it, uh, lining up. and i i think that maybe we need to pay a little less attention to them and work on our agenda. after all, we have formed it. we have certain

relationships. we remember this date. we know what it has to do with us and, uh, a certain event is always lined up, you can’t live all the time in the paradigm that we want to prove something to someone, we need to prove it and go on developing our own way. why is this? maybe you? unwittingly, you are absolutely right. i agree with you that you really need to build your own native and your way and your strategy. but here you involuntarily, probably, pull yourself up and draw parallels with the twentieth year and look and understand that if everything went well. this means that to could turn out to be a force here, for whom it would be natural , to close the projects on which it is built to rewrite from a direct view of other states, moldova, the baltics, ukraine , that is, they, instead of building the world's education system there. they destroy the old ones. here we are now with you, for example, we are discussing only how they will remake the momentary chants to link the incomparable, deterrence weapons and, for example, the chernobyl tragedy but we see how

history is being rewritten. here, thinking about it. we recently recalled the speech of russia's permanent representative to the un , not benzia, who, using a specific example , told what all this is about. can reach. i will ask you now to show a fragment of the total screening of the educational process and rewriting the joint pages of the history of the russian and ukrainian people, the ministry of education and science of ukraine is engaged in the most ambitious adjustments. exposed program in history and geography. i even took it with me. a geography textbook for the eighth grade edited by maslyak and copied, if you believe him, then the ancestors of the french, spaniards, portuguese, turks, and even jews came from ukraine. i want to turn to my french colleague. nicolas, you knew that you were actually ukrainian. don't believe. read the textbook. i took it from there, it has iron logic, since the ancestors of the french are gals, they came from galina

, which is in ukraine. do you know that, according to the author of the textbook, ukrainians, poles have slavic origin, and the russians of the countess were denied the slavic status of belarusians, they were attributed to the baltic peoples. that's it, that's why, when you're watching, that's what they sometimes try to tie to our events. this is where you involuntarily think. how far it can go from ridiculous and absurd, but, apparently , ukraine today is in this reality , history should not be humiliated to get bogged down in modern cuts, but uh, it ’s dangerous because uh, it’s not that this is thrown into the information space danger is that we can join this discussion as soon as we reach out. here in this discussion, then at the end, as a rule, only

this foam will remain, which today is ours and if we go along the path to prove that we slavs will begin to remember our sources and so on, then this is extremely important for them to draw you and us into this discussion , which is absolutely meaningless, because it will be broken. and any story that you invite from belarus will do it with ease. i think even for 5 minutes, but uh, it's important to them. that's it and it's very important for us today not to get involved, not all supporters. unfortunately propaganda does not interest the historian of opinion. and today , today, we are watching this story. and i open the internet from these ones, that we are balts - this is from everyone. e extremist telegram channel. it is carried on purpose and will be carried because the youth who watch tiktok short information. she won't wait for the story. today there is an information war. we have already passed the period of time when we

belarusians were sitting, including talking. all right, let's only talk about the good agenda. let's talk only about our achievements. this will never happen again. then they themselves will explain everything to people for us, and we will lose the information war. today we are ahead of the curve. we will debunk their fakes, we will say that they are liars, we will show that they are lying and the youth hears us. i see it. now, traveling around the country, we must work ahead of the curve and not allow them to seize the initiative from us. today we get it. today we talk a lot about security, and the other day in grodno there was a picture that made it possible to visually, but look at who the country protects in the first place. i propose now to watch fragments of this spontaneous meeting on grodny street, please. well, girls to the disco. fuck you at the disco. i guess

i won't say, well, please. if you all drink quietly, quietly in the twentieth year, it's okay. let's do everything possible. here we are leaving the children, why are you looking like that? thanks guys. all the best. live peacefully. goodbye, they paid attention than the president, when he left here a few minutes earlier, when a meeting with

the president was held in grodno. what did he say to an official that it is better to fight in the field than there, and it’s understandable. what was meant there, and leaving here he said, live peacefully for ordinary people, that is, oleg sergeevich turns out. here it is, and the formula for our security is to work and live in peace. you understand how many people envy us. they are actually jealous. i was here when in the donbass and in other countries they envy us. that's when you look at these shots, when there are four of these big weekends. you see these queues at the cemetery. you see how people clean up the graves of the world of the sun. this is how the soul rejoices, but you still understand what is behind this, and behind this is the painstaking work of the president of the security forces. i remember his words on the message. here i have defined this for myself as the installation: you work and protect your family, and we will protect the country with the military , the president spoke about this in his message. me. this hit very hard. and these words

are right, you have to work. we must really work at our workplace to defend our homeland. and then we have these peaceful days, the sunny days that were here these weekends will always be worth a lot. these are the children, these are the young girls who come to the president happy with the children. they live happily. they may not understand how happy they are not seeing what is happening, there aleksey sergeevich remembered the messages themselves. we all remember your questions that have already been asked, and we talk a lot today is about values. here, let's talk a little bit about western values, literally a touch. uh, western values ​​that shine for us and thank god, and in canada, the ministers from justin's office of labor staged a defile in parliament in women's pink high-heeled shoes and that's it. this they dedicated a quote of support to women who are being abused. i don't know why i remember it now. it seemed to me that they wanted to see again that he had slept with a woman. here's poor trump if he was gay

or a transvestite and would sue everyone who you are something would offend him. that's what a world man can not sleep with a woman. everything, that's with anyone, catch the dog sleeping. uh, with kids. maybe pedophiles sell him. it is forbidden. so it may be that this rift is taking place in the world today and it is the main one, that there is something that needs to be cleaned up or sorted out to completely decompose the orthodox church in ukraine, yes. this is the last on what rests, probably, european civilization. and they want to remove it and you are right. there is a struggle going on not only between the west, but also between russia and there is a struggle of values, will we save we really, that's all everything, what we believed and our ancestors. i know what else i'm sure. god sees everything and god is on our side. here, indeed. we need this new push project to move on. look, we don't look into space at all. we rushed when we are now playing with this

artificial intelligence. he never once had intelligence. the machine counts. it's just a highly advanced calculator. this is not intelligence. and for some reason we are trying to imagine and get carried away to fall under the spell that he once will replace, something about us does not understand how we ourselves are degrading. that's what we really need in order to somehow go further and not get lost, for the sake of which all this is. well, i would pay attention to the reaction of the canadian society itself, because these women and men judged this action very sharply. they considered it offensive to both men and women and in general an issue regarding violence against women. he was e, literally flattened under these heels they trampled. uh, what women have been fighting for for centuries, and what, uh, no offense will be said to the men present here. so far they have not been able to decide, and this action showed a lot. uh, how are these issues generally handled, so i don't think it's a role model. but, uh,

indeed, europe today is going exactly that way. and i would draw attention to the fact that e here is the backbone that we have e he is in this picture yes in grodno and if you take a screenshot and place it in the european information space, then, probably, they would see that past life real normal, which they have already forgotten a little. and we live in it. we agreed with sergeyevich this idea, this is a huge value, and uh, what else? i paid attention to the words. and yuryevich himself, uh, the twentieth year, uh, and today we remember, and he is here, again, he remembered, because we constantly oppose ourselves to the united states of america, whether the united states of america had their january, 21, storming, capitol, does joseph remember biden today explains this situation

or is he to the population? what happened, then no longer i remember, but after all, we cannot remember a single speech by alexander grigorievich when he did not say this in the twentieth guest, where is democracy. we are opposed by the fact that we are authoritarian states, we do not work with the population. and this is what we have all the time. thank you for this conversation, and we thank our guests, but we don’t say goodbye in a couple of minutes to the global confrontation with the eyes of the americans by a former marine and scout scott-treater a big and frank conversation. stay with us. we continue right now the conversation, which we have been waiting mercilessly for a long time, the information war has almost taught us to give the world to the west, east, zeroing out everything in common and focusing solely on differences. so it seemed to us that this is a very narrow view, and we gave up in order to discuss serious topics with people who are on the other

side of both the world and the information front, how they look at all this and at us, including those who, like us, want to find out what has led the world to its current stage of madness. actually, that's why with one of the most famous americans in the russian-speaking telegram. scott rieter, we talked not so much about current events. how many main watersheds are there between our countries and peoples? so, a former american marine and scout scotter hello, mister rhetor, we always follow your speeches with interest. thank you for being with us today thank you for the invitation. ah. ronaldo is now talking to him a lot about the offensive on the ukrainian front, even the terms are called. and how do you see the alignment of forces in this confrontation. first, no. there is no

doubt that russia is stronger side, but just because you are stronger does not mean that you play musulami. this is an efficient method. i think at an early stage. russia had a certain understanding of the nature of this conflict. they called it a special military operation. it wasn't an invasion. this was not a war. i think russia expected. that this conflict would end earlier than it turned out, in fact, russia believed that they could force ukraine to the negotiating table and indeed, it seems that russia succeeded in this endeavor and held three meetings in belarus in gomel and then another in istanbul last year on april 1st.

this could lead to a ceasefire and the entire conflict, but it was nato that intervened and forced ukraine to disagree with this, so the confrontation continues and i don’t think that russia immediately adequately responded to this military supply of $ 50 billion to ukraine . when ukraine retook the kharkov region and kherson, and only in september. uh, russia began to respond properly to this new reality , there was a partial mobilization of 300.000 military personnel and regrouping of forces. so today we have russia which i believe is capable of winning the war with ukraine and

nato. they are specifically a military operation that was carried out for political purposes. they call it a special military operation, but the reality is that today it is largely a war between russia and the collective west, which uses ukraine as an intermediary. and i think that russia has a chance of winning washington will give washington understand this. i mean what does this mean for ukraine who understands this is ah, well, do they understand the essence of the ukrainian tragedy? well, i think russia understands this. i mean, the whole special military operation was designed to minimize harm to the ukrainian people , infrastructure and so on, russia had a problem with the ukrainian government. but this is politics, and people should understand that before

the start of the special military operation, it was russia and only russia that sought a peaceful outcome. russia insisted on the implementation of the minsk agreements. this is not russia turned away from minsk, it was france, it was germany , it was the united states, and even after they turned their backs, russia was pushing the agreed outcome with these 2021 treaties. it is the united states and nato that refused to abide by these pave treaties that you will ignore. therefore, i think this is a tragic situation for russia and for which ukraine is a fraternal slavic nation because of their common soviet

history of relations between russians and ukrainians. this is such a family level for those very russians who are fighting today there are ukrainian wives, ukrainian husbands, ukrainian mothers, ukrainian fathers, this is a human tragedy of such a magnitude that we in the west do not understand, we see it as a conflict, not as a tragedy and which, in essence, is i would like to hear from you how how far can this man go in his political ambitions? well, he's the president of the united states after all, he's reached the pinnacle of political ambition. he announced that he was going to be re-elected. and this means that he adheres to those political directions in which he has already gone politics is very difficult to be re-elected without advertising his

track record. therefore, i think that he will double his efforts on ukraine, double his support for ukraine and will. unfortunately, seek to prolong this conflict. very important for many russians of the film daniil bagrov asked such a question. what is the power to take? who has a clear vision? i have repeatedly said that russia is on the right side of history on the side of truth you know that we are all human means that we all make mistakes and sit here and say that russia

was flawless in the implementation of its policy. it would be absurd human error does not detract from the fact that russia was trying to do the right thing with ukraine. they didn't want this war. they tried to avoid russia sacrificing its own people in an attempt to minimize the impact of the conflict on the ukrainian people of the west, that russia sacrificed its own people to save the lives of ukrainians. in general, russia is on the right side of history . the russian cause is a just cause. i think that in this case, the truth will come out. you know, right now the emotions are very, very high and those emotions, especially in the west

, are heightened by the level of ignorance of russia . that's why i think you can't understand it where you are? i don't think you fully understand how ignorant we are here in the united states about belarus russia ukraine juliet ignorance breeds fear because we're afraid of what we don't understand our political leaders are manipulating to make us wallow in this conflict, but in the end, the truth will come out. we will understand the truth , we will understand the truth about why this war began, how it began, and who is to blame for this . and i believe that russia, as i said, will be on the right side of history. i have a question just in this case. everyone understands that the war in ukraine will not stop until the washingtons are interested in it, but how ordinary americans see this process. we're really wondering, russia. i think we

've been led to believe that vladimir putin is a brutal dictator who seeks to bring back russia the glory days of the soviet union that russia wants to become a world power able not only to be equal to the united states, but also to win and therefore, when you tell people this is the fear that existed during the mccarthy era in the fifties red fear, when we were afraid of communism, and we used it is to justify the expansion of the us armed forces today is the same. we need an enemy and this enemy of russia we need to create this enemy to justify our

exorbitant military spending, to justify the existence of nato. so in the united states, uh, i think you'd be shocked at how it's happening it's not discussed much, because the moment, for example, when someone like me dares to speak up and say, well, wait a minute. why don't we consider? it is you who are called a russian propagandist, a puppet of putin , and you are called a disinformer, thus the debate dialogue and discussion, which in america is the basis of the freedom of speech, which we claim. we support, in fact deed. everything, it is strongly discouraged when it comes to discussing russia and the war in ukraine is a wind. you are a direct person, so you will allow yourself to ask a direct question - enemies for the americans. they can be if

america acts like an enemy to russia, i mean every nation has the right to self-defense and self-preservation and if america positions itself as a threat to russia then russia is america's enemy not because russia wants to be her enemy, but because we forced it russia to be an enemy of america but i will say this is that if you extend your hand of friendship and russia she will extend her hand in return and take your hand and the countries will be good friends. good partners. russia does not want to be an enemy of the united states but if the united states behaves like an enemy of russia what should russia do

this is one of the problems of ideologically oriented politics, because we consider russia and, as a result, belarus as an enemy. you know when you're in conflict the last thing you want is to i have seen you as a fellow identified with you as a human being, because then my humanity kicks in and i say why i want to hurt you. this is the last thing a person should want to do to another person. therefore, in order to justify this policy of sanctions, we must degunize you and the first thing we do is attack your leadership, because in the west we believe in the principle of democracy, according to which, ironically, free and independent people do not choose bad people as their leaders. i

i know maybe we are doing so well here in the united states and europe but look at your leaders and then as a consequence we will attack you don't be surprised and therefore we can go along with imposing sanctions because we accuse you of you have bad leadership. we say it's your fault . the blame of the people on your leaders, so we have no sympathy for the suffering we 've caused. and if you want to end suffering. you must change your leadership. so this approach is why the most dangerous thing that could happen from the point of view of american and european politicians. this is what i am having a discussion with you about which i treat you as equals as a person, because i treat you as a person. i expose the soulless nature of the american european. policies of sanctions against the peoples of belarus russia and then we do not notice the irony that although we may have made your life uncomfortable, and i believe

that the sanctions did it, you do not suffer europe suffers these sanctions gave the opposite effect and europe actually suffers because of its own policies aimed at harming russia and belarus and i do not understand how the european people can continue to support policies that harm them without achieving the desired results in russia this is a democracy problem the whole world is watching hollywood movies follow the lives of your stars eating pepsi hamburgers but it can hardly be called love for america i will try to explain if this is felt in the usa itself but the main thing that annoys americans abroad. this is a dictation, then what allows himself in washington because he does not allow

anyone else. time surprises the russian point of view or the american, i'm talking about the opinion of the americans. well, from a theoretical standpoint , i should be surprised, because america is supposed to uphold the right of the individual to individual freedoms, and we should respect sovereignty, but the reality is that we act differently. this is really good sir. rita i feel i should clarify my question. i ask him no, in order to somehow offend your patriotic feelings. if you are an american it is logical that you love your country. understandably, my question is about something else . all this is important, because america still held number one today. and this is not only a right, but also a great responsibility. well , i'm sure you agree with that. right, but

that's what i'm trying to convey. this is an example let's look at what joe biden says as president. he says our best export is american democracy, but what are we exporting? as you can see, democracy is not defined hollywood soda or clothing democracy is more intuitive and democracy is a principled position principles that speak of the empowerment of the individual for the benefit of the collective for everyone on the planet for all the moment that all this was created for the united states american democracy was built american history unique american a story that cannot be reproduced

anywhere else. so when we talk about american democracy. it is the product of an imperfect history. remember when we signed our constitution we had slavery when we signed our constitution women didn't have the right to vote. we had to grow as a nation, and we waged war not only against england but also a civil war against ourselves. we have a civil rights movement that is against inequalities in how we treat people of color here in the united states and we're still dealing with these issues with these historical issues that define who we are and who we are. . so our democracy aimed at solving american problems. how can we take this and insist that you and belarus follow the american model, our model is based on our history, if democracy is really possible in belarus, it should follow the belarusian model, starting from the history of belarus, the same with russia, it can

be a democracy. it will be a democracy with a belarusian face, reflecting belarusian values ​​and principles, and they will be different from ours, and we must accept that the rest of the world cannot and will not live like mirror projection of the united states and this is biden's failure, because we cannot export democracy. democracy must grow from within in every direction. we must encourage this growth, but in order to do so, we must respect differences. and america does not do this, because, as it were , they correctly noticed. we dictate. we don't lend a helping hand. we don't offer it. we dictate decisions, no nation wants to be dictated to and finally. i'd like to ask, that's what it's kind of weird about. here right now. both of us communicate easily, discuss complex topics, many of our political countries. that's definitely not friends, but rest, what prevents you from hearing each other? uh, you

know i'd say you can hear me well enough? i believe that belarus is heard well enough, the united states and i don't think it's a problem with belarus, it doesn't mean we can't have a disagreement. they can be they are and it is quite logical. but you know the key aspect of disagreement is the ability to communicate and navigate your way through problems to a solution fair for both parties. but for this to happen, it's not only that you hear me, it's just what america does, we say and insist that you listen, and then we insist that you act on what we say, what we don't do. so it's not taking time out and listening to what you have to say hearing what you have to say and

acting on what you have to say communication should be a two way street right now the united states is out of touch. we dictate and you cannot solve this problem. you know one of the things i've always said is that you can't solve a problem. if you don't first define it exactly, because if you don't know what the problem is, the solution is no. right now the problem is that you have wisely noticed. this lack of communication is the problem between the united states and belarus. the united states and russia, we do not communicate effectively enough, but you see , the us does not recognize this, because we believe that we communicate effectively, that we tell you what we want from you. well, why don't we do it. so that doesn't complete the rest of the equation, which is to listen to what you have to say , treat it with respect, and come up with a mutually acceptable solution to the problem. thank you very much for being with us

good luck and we hope to meet again. thank you very much. thanks, have a nice day. well , this is how the conversation turned out, as it often happens, everyone saw something of their own in it, but as for me, this is another illustration of those forces for whom democracy is only a screen , behind which there is no place, neither humanism nor friendship , peoples, a small project, like a victory over poverty or a breakthrough into outer space for this vile, but very influential rudeness. alien life is just a resource or a hindrance from here to look like a new plague of transgender gardens, and artificial intelligence like a wolf in sheep's clothing. it's not even an experiment anymore. this is some kind of war started without our knowledge, and both countries have something to lose in it, but if for them it is capital, then for billions of others, a matter of being. in the most christian sense, it seems

that such a battle is going on now and something suggests that few people succeed in being just a spectator in this global battle. thanks for being happy with us. the strong power of the content should have a bright attractive form - a system of meanings, principles and values ​​that must be defended. that's what it means we 'll tolerate or there are many ways for others to respond. we are preparing for the world. do you want to avoid war? get even stronger. here personally for myself. i have drawn enough conclusions from those events. what would you do differently today. we must work with the youth.

we must fight for them everywhere in schools at events on literature in culture, if a person's consciousness is enlightened, if there is truth, then his activity will be a creative upward progressive project of markov nothing personal. watch the dialogue with professionals and leading experts in the field of economics and business politics on belarus 24 channel. they came to belarus to build their lives and make everything for the development of the country i am very glad that i have been working in brest for 4.5 years. i hope that i will work here for some more time, because they do not end with a huge amount of plans, they only increase. this is my workplace every day, uh, i come and start cutting myself the best of my work. uh, then i think that this work is the royal gate, of course, i fell in love with brest with all my heart and all

my soul. i feel at home here. watch in the program a look at belarus on our tv channel.

hello, in this issue, may 1 is already in belarus sowing potatoes, and wanted corn.