the chest route and departure, taking into account the terrain, but france stated that they would not participate in ukraine's operations on the territory of other states. here is oleg sergeevich what do you think about this when you hear such plans for mrs. ukraine i perfectly understand that this threatens with very serious provocations, which can lead not just as an escalation of the conflict in ukraine, but drawing all of europe into this conflict, why is this macron had the reaction. it would seem that europe lies under the united states of america sovereignty, there is no all decisions that are made in the white house, europe takes under the hood and executes, despite the fact that it actually hits its national interest in all economic political issues of national security, but on the other hand, even there even there, despite the lack of sovereignty , there is understanding. what the escalation with belarus can lead to, after all

, it will not be possible to draw belarus alone into the war , for example, the president spoke about this more than once in his message. if they are drawn in, belarus is drawn in all of europe is no longer a special one, the military operation will already use all the forces and capabilities that the allied state of europe has and what europe understands this will lead to, but i see that you don’t question what the french newspaper reports. this is a cozy french newspaper , does not mean after that 100%, moreover, i am convinced that kiev is fulfilling the will of the united states and what is the will of the united states to prolong the conflict as long as possible? more blood should be shed ukrainian resources. they're exhaustible we see now, what's going on at the front? we see that the most combat-ready units of the armed forces, which have been preparing for many years, are simply being crushed by russian troops. it's a matter of time, what's next?

how to support this conflict, how to make it break out, we need new foreigners, we need new victims, who they have the baltics, but this is only rhetoric, they don’t have a human resource, a lot of rhetoric, as the great three call them on the internet. lithuania latvia estonia causing laughter, which the poles can only bark, there is this time, but on the other hand. i would very much like to draw a dream, belarus was always directed to this by their policy to destroy our state from the inside, to make it here at the beginning of the civil war, and then i’ll throw all this at russia, after some time it didn’t work out. so it is necessary to provoke, therefore he claims that kiev has applied for such data not only as france to all the west. well, we see that, apparently , france has refused other silence. this suggests that exactly 100% of the baldivian baltic countries will relax, poland will give any. data that ukraine will request we understand this very well, and there is only one criterion here - which country has more

sovereignty. she does not agree to this, although france lies under the united states but still it is the founding country of the european union, like germany, it is the main country of the big big three of the eu. well, look at the foliage, look how interesting it turns out. hmm. that's what the zelensky regime is terrible now and why we have to deal with such information with which we started discussing today with maximum tension, but listen, because they have barbaric logic. here look what just recently said, an adviser to the head of zelensky's office is a podolak. he said that ukraine has the right to destroy everything that is in the crimea and donbass . it seems, wait, you are shouting all the time that this is your land of crimea donbass and you want to destroy everything with amazingly barbaric logic, which is being broadcast now, kiev officially. i think this is the logic of war in the first place. we should treat it like that, but still i would doubt that paris single-handedly made such a decision

regarding the digital map of belarus. i think that it is correct, such an informational message is given with a simulated one. i would see two signals here , first of all, the fact that preventing the expansion of the conflict remains extremely important for the european union at this stage and the position of france - this has demonstrated, and the second very important signal is the firmness of the position. uh, and uh, the determination of the response from belarus is finally realized by the europeans or there, and that's why this message is so wide. uh, circulated in the press. i think it is too no matter who you think. that's what kind of game france is playing right now. we see that what is m-m such a fickle, unstable in this regard, but a macron. here he goes to baideno and says, we are brothers in arms in the war for ukraine, he returns from beijing and says that now in europe there is no need to fight for

taiwan at all, we should not follow the american way, then he declares this. our task is to help ukraine survive. by all means. do not let russia win, do not allow the expansion of this conflict. that's what the game is and that's the most important thing, who's the game leads me with his hands. and i think that, uh, this situation, how is it related to the fact that we, from our point of view, evaluate solidarity a little if we are talking about solidarity, because it could when they have solidarity, yes, and we, uh, see , its only in our understanding and more in belarusian, but there are other options, there is a belarusian version, indeed, it is built, e. on the position of the union of like-minded people with a very high share of responsibility on a global scale. and there is another well-known for us. e point of view. this is mine already. we will simply express the tobacco, apart , and in fact the macron demonstrates it today,

but i would pay attention to one more point, which hides paris and the macron a lot. uh, in particular, but paris is today between the lights. these are the sanctions of the united states of america, these are retaliatory measures from china and russia, and without restraint. the protectionism that is spreading across europe is why all the actions of the macron are aimed at somehow surviving this fight that is unfolding today. we have it in the information space, they don’t want to represent it yet, but it exists, and this is where all the subtleties of french foreign policy lie; we are talking about the survival of europe in general for today all, and not just france. and there are a huge number of problems in the european union and, in general, a priori, the macroru very often evaluated the internal audience , which must be shown at least something that he defends the national interests. the french, after all, everything that the macro says is actually discussed in europe, and so why are we helping ukraine, why are we supplying weapons?

why do we need a war? take care of french problems, sort out, in the end , the mountains of garbage that lie in the city with migrants. nobody cares about the problem. only grows. well, there is one more aspect that i would like to mention. we should never again believe a word of what european politicians say, lest they tell us. we don't want escalation, we don't want war, we will never attack. we don't want war with russia not to believe a single word. we must remember one simple thing - they will have the slightest opportunity to attack and destroy. here they will know that it will not be in the name of democracy and freedom and all the belarusians who will die here. they'll say no big deal. this is for the great bright future, so not believing a single word is the only way to prevent war being strong, therefore the president is right, when now is over. for all these years, especially the last year, he pays a huge amount of attention not in words to issues of national security and our military

power, and they are afraid of this word, but in fact , today we have pushed aside, in fact, the war very, simply pushed aside not by haritorism nor their promise and not by their words, but by the fact that today our military potential has increased significantly, and after the deployment of tactical nuclear weapons. this step, uh, will postpone the war for another long time to discuss, but completing the topic of this, as olga igorievna correctly said, solidarity is what seems to us to be solidarity here in the west, apparently. it looks like the united states is outraged, and the fact that they broadcast to the general public and paris and brussels along with it. they say in time of a telephone conversation by a canoe. he planted a macron for the post-beijing theses, but this conflict was most clearly expressed by the vice president of the american foundation. heritage, kharitovich foundation, is the most influential factory of american thought. james krafana code national interest magazine published an article where he actually threatens to reconsider the status

of the united states as the leading donor of ukraine, it is necessary to demand from france other partners of the report, who and how helped kiev, and until now, until the eu reports to the united states, they should not send ukraine money. so here is such a solidarity and a host. so the whole policy is shifted again and again. here is the notorious counterattack that they cannot agree among themselves how they will divide further and because of this, too, but one more thing must be said, the americans are now destroying the european economy every month, they are destroying it, they put it on a gas needle, which means they are american put her on an industrial needle. now many european enterprises are moving to other countries. many aspire, including and in the usa that is, today they have hooked europe on themselves, that is, complete dependence on america, what will happen to it? i'm afraid that germany

, uh, france is not pulling on itself. do they really not understand this burden of europe? it's being given to them now. ah, independence. well, look, there is a statement from here. we see that, on the one hand, the united states is saying in plain text to its partners there , too. the region is in south korea first of all, reduce the supply of microchips, do not trade with china and this is $ 300 billion the trade turnover between south korea and china and the same thing, they now say to the european union, and all trade with europe, china has how much 850 billion dollars there, you can understand why they do not want to burn bridges. and why are such seemingly large states of power economically so powerless? seriously, how is your salon? well, i would not say the completely ostentatious position of europe, of course, it exists, but the only thing is that they have relaxed since the forty-fifth year and are accustomed to receiving this kind of subsidies and living in

such a stable world, but uh financial world, but then, uh, what you said about. he started publishing because this is the formula that trump once put forward. this was the first question after he came to power that he asked her in europe how long we will be with you. it's time for you to invest in your safety. and today it is already a question. do they understand this in europe, of course, sensible european analysts from the very beginning of the conflict in ukraine, uh, say that europe should go on its own track, and what the macron said, it's not just his words, but the macron is forced to protect not only the interests of those he represents, but uh, he is the president of france so he is limited, but i think there is an even more important undercurrent on today, other than this fuss that we're seeing between the us and europe, uh, the globalization that we've seen economic and

interconnectedness and the transformation that it's brought about in the economy in the political landscape. she, uh, had two sides. this, what we see for the golden billion is enrichment and the second very important side is the clubs of elite powers and those schemes that were previously hidden, they became available to a large number of states , and if earlier the countries of asia in the middle east watched the behavior of their partners the united states and the european union, then today they ask a question and european analysts. this is noted they ask the question of, uh, the united states of america and european. the union has reached such heights thanks to its own potential, or we allowed them to do this and i am convinced that today the number of those who ask the second part of the question is already much larger and we see in the number up to those countries that have expressed their desire recently it

was reported to join the brig in the arab the emirates of saudi arabia and many other states have added another very important point in europe. why are we now talking about it, it is not a sovereign history. everything just means a lot, uh in the ninety-first year, soviet troops left eastern europe uh-huh, the americans have not gone anywhere. this is the first reason it all started with this, because the americans then took control of europe and wanted to take all the post-soviet space under control, and then russia missed the baltic states, missed ukraine, missed a number of other countries , we need to talk about this, and then the economy financial control. and who controls the largest enterprises in the european union where are the owners behind the ribbon in america further, and who controls the elections in the european union? or can we now say that the americans do not interfere in european elections still intervened, and in some countries. uh, such as poland for them elections the key is important for

the further development of europe, so the elections in poland will be already now. the americans are interfering in them. biden's visit is already here. in warsaw, he was not only connected with ukraine, he was connected, including with pre-election poland, he is clearly, yes. signal what kind of poland the us needs well, the president of poland picked up this slogan by saying more america to europe that's all politics. let's talk about safety. history with britain's plans will deliver shells with combined uranium to ukraine, it seems like a whole series has been continued. the media published, e, the answer of the deputy minister of defense of great britain, james hippie, to a parliamentary inquiry , in which he makes it clear that, in fact, they have already supplied ukraine with about 2,000 shells for challenge tanks, 2, among which there is ammunition with combined uranium. moreover, when they started, well, counter, apparently questions to ask. but what about next with these shells, what about responsibility, two indicators are further

uk undersecretary of defense quotes he said for reasons of operational security. we will not comment on the indicators of the use of the supplied kits, and the second in the uk does not have an obligation to eliminate the consequences of the use of shells from uranium in ukraine, that is, ukraine does not need such friends at all, a scorched field. i think such informational messages. they appear in connection with a widely advertised offensive, a counter-offensive, the largest of which is is expected in april in may, that is, these deadlines in june, the deadlines are constantly postponed and but such a heat is on the information agenda. it must be present today as well . these are irresponsible statements. they are just in order to create tension in belarus as well, because if we follow this whole chain, even because we discussed today. uh, this is clearly, as it were

, traced, uh, and belarus, russia should prepare for a serious conflict, because the counteroffensive is in the form that we informational agenda is presented. it should be of the west, but destroying everything, that is, the situation will be completely reversed. all uh, it’s natural that we, like in soviet times, like during the cold war, we begin to reflex, that is, we, uh, are re-equipping, spending huge amounts of human resources and financial resources in order to counter what we don’t know about it creates tension in society, because today work is going on on the one hand on the military front, and on the other parties and for the population. including the americans, when they dropped a bomb on japan on hiroshima nagasaki, recently an american official stood in japan and was even afraid to say that it was the usa. yes, he says, this, of course, is a tragedy. and who is responsible for this tragedy, and who will answer for the mutilated iraqi children? what kind of shells were used in

iraq, how many children after that were ill with oncological diseases? how many people yes, how many people were destroyed 1 million 200 and the raks died, who will take responsibility, so uh, this uk official do not lie to them do not care. what difference does it make how europe will be contaminated with radiation, but this will affect europe, this will affect not only ukraine, the winds blow differently, therefore, of course. it's scary and another way. russia has no way to win today. making a decision to place tactical poison on weapons on our territory is a weapon of prudence. not only containment, but prudence for those who are hatching such plans to save europe from a big war. they should rejoice that we are deploying tactical nuclear weapons today, and why rejoice, because the americans who command europe will also think three times what command to give? do not touch this belarus, i will not say for one simple

reason you are not here, we are all sitting across the ocean. if a negative scenario suddenly starts, therefore we have never threatened anyone, everyone knows this very well. this is a lie that is being poured on belarus that we seem to be unable to help but ask. in this case, this, of course, is such a significant date for us, uh, another one. anniversary of the chernobyl tragedy, it has always been a political theme for the belarusian opposition here absolutely forever, but this time they seem to have surpassed themselves, they managed to connect this day on april 26 with the deployment of tactical nuclear weapons in belarus. here's how you listen to it. do you remember how they connected this day with the construction of the belarusian nuclear power plant. they have everything we do, e.g. for the country for the state for its security for the development of the economy. everything is bad. at the same time, everything that others do is good. lithuania is placing nuclear waste on the border with belarus. wonderful. poland will build a nuclear power plant. construction sites, so lithuania will want to build construction sites. this is the politicization of the chernobyl theme. this

use is for a purpose only. pr, they don't care about this belarusian people, they don't care about our polluted territories. they never went there, who was there lukashenko lukashenko from the moment the presidency began every year was not afraid to go there. i didn’t just go to the programs, i defended it, which means when the supreme soviet, i remember, was. uh, strong, when power was not presidential. he then over the top, he swore with advice that the money should go there, that people should be supported by this help. uh, affected region. this is real politics. and this is the usual pr to walk around the center of minsk with a bell and ring the bell. rubbish would be removed. i remember on uh, downtown streets. eh, papers. we collected a rake, they would take it, and they are 30 years old, a bell, disguised, a fool for a priest, and they go with this bell, they ring, and then the cars turn over. i remember my first chernobyl, i am a kursan. so the academy of the ministry of internal affairs of the anniversary of the chernobyl tragedy me without

helmets without a helmet. send without anything. i didn’t know what it was, maybe there is a convoy. una, he keeps turning cars and us cadets, by the way, he himself stood with me and in the army mikhailovich was then a cadet of the water academy. we recently remembered and they throw stones at us. this is called to honor the memory of chernobyl. this is what you are doing so nothing has changed now. now they will walk. just the truth in the middle. warsaw doesn’t look like much , doesn’t pass through paris. police. they will see. what is democratic france, which is based largely on nuclear power plants, so you do not look like. and here, by the way, olga igorevna , oleg sergeevich raised an interesting idea that , indeed, it may have become, the time when april 26th for us. this is not only a time of memory of this tragedy, but also a certain symbol of the revival of belarus in spite of in the name of here despite all forecasts, that is, more work allowed to revive these lands. although many did not believe that this was possible, especially in such

a time frame and in the name, well, in the name of the present, in addition to so that children could live here on those lands, and we see that it was possible. that is, maybe it's really time to rebuild attitudes to this day, to those events, but to this. i think that it has already been rebuilt in belarus. i think that it is at the level of ordinary people. uh, that's what you're talking about, it's just connected with the future, not with the past with the events that were, but with the future, and for the information agenda , alekseevich absolutely agrees, the key word is nuclear everything, as if everything around it, uh, lining up. and i i think that maybe we need to pay a little less attention to them and work on our agenda. after all, we have formed it. we have certain relationships. we remember this date. we know how it is connected to us and, uh, a certain event is always lined up, you can’t live all the time in the paradigm that we want to prove something to someone, you need to prove it and go develop your own, maybe you’re here

involuntarily. you are absolutely right. i agree with you that you really need to build both your own natives and your own path and your strategy. but here you involuntarily, probably, pull yourself up and draw parallels with the twentieth year and look and understand that if everything went well. that could turn out to be a force here, for which it would be natural to close the projects on which it is built to rewrite from a direct view of other states, moldova, the baltics, ukraine, that is, they, instead of the world, build an education system there. they destroy the old ones. here we are now with you, for example, we are discussing only how they will remake the momentary chants link incomparable deterrence weapons and, for example, the chernobyl tragedy but we see how history is being rewritten. here, thinking about it. we recently recalled the speech of russia's permanent representative to the un , not benzia, who, using a specific example , told what all this is about. can reach. i will ask you now to show a fragment of the total screening of the educational process and the rewriting

of joint pages with the history of the russian and ukrainian people, the ministry of education and science of ukraine is engaged in the most ambitious adjustments. exposed program in history and geography. i even took it with me. a geography textbook for the eighth grade edited by a muslim and copied, if you believe him, then the ancestors of the french, spaniards, portuguese, turks, and even jews came from ukraine. i want to turn to my french colleague. you knew that you are actually ukrainian. don't believe. read the textbook. i took it from there. it has iron logic. since the ancestors of the french in this gala, they came from galina, which is in ukraine . do you know what, according to the author of the textbook ukrainians, poles are of slavic origin, and the russians of the countess were denied the slavic status of belarusians, they were attributed to the baltic peoples. that is why, when

you see what they sometimes try to tie to our events. this is where you involuntarily think. how far it can go from ridiculous and ridiculous to apparently. ukraine today in this reality is history should not be humiliated to the point that you get bogged down in modern woods, but it’s dangerous because it’s not that this information space is thrown into danger is that we can join this discussion as soon as we reach out. here in this discussion, then at the end, as a rule, only this foam, which we have chosen today, will remain. it will be, if we go along the path of proving that we are slavs, we will begin to remember our sources , and so on, then it is extremely important for them to draw you into this

absolutely meaningless discussion, because it will be broken. uh, any story you invite from belarus will do it with ease. i think even for 5 minutes, but uh, it's important to them. this is exactly what we are very , uh, it is important today not to involve all the states. unfortunately propaganda does not interest the historian of opinion. and today, today, we are watching this story. and i open the internet from these, that we are balts - this is from everyone. e extremist telegram channel. it is carried on purpose and will be carried because the youth who watch tiktok short information. she won't wait for the story. today there is an information war. we have already passed the period of time when we sat in belarus, including saying that everything ok, let's just talk about the good agenda. let's talk only about our achievements. this will never happen again. then they themselves will explain everything to people for us, and we will lose the information war. today

we are ahead of the curve. we will debunk their fakes, we will say that they are liars, we will show that they are lying and the youth hears us. i see it. now driving around the country to work. we need tension and not let them seize the initiative from us. today we get it about security and the other day in grodno there was a picture that made it possible to visually, but look at who the country protects in the first place. i propose now to watch fragments of this spontaneous meeting on grodno street, please. well, girls on the disk. i'm not at your disco. hello can you please say, well if you all press quieter quieter quieter in

the twentieth year, it's okay. let's do everything possible. here we have children, we are really leaving, why are you looking like that? thanks guys. all the best. live peacefully. goodbye, paid attention than the president, when he left just a few minutes earlier in when a meeting with the president was held in grodno. he said to the officials that it is better to fight in the field than there, and it is clear which one was meant there, and leaving here he said, live peacefully as usual, that is, oleg sergeevich turns out. this is the formula for our

security to work and live in the world. you understand how many people envy us. they are actually jealous. i've been here when in the donbass and in other countries they envy us. that's when you look at these shots, when there are four of these big weekends. do you see these line at the cemetery. you see how people clean up the graves of the world of the sun. this is how the soul rejoices, but you still understand what is behind this, and behind this is the painstaking work of the president of the security forces. i remember his words on the message. here i have defined this for myself as the installation: you work and protect your family, and we will protect the country with the military , the president spoke about this in his message. me. it hit very hard. and these words are right, you have to work. we must really work at our workplace to defend our homeland. and then we have these peaceful days sunny days that were here this weekend will always be worth it. these are the children, these are the young men. e girls

who come to the president are happy with the kids. they live happily. they can literally be values ​​that we do not shine - thank god, but in canada the ministers are from the cabinet. they dedicated a quote to support women who are being abused. i don’t know why i remembered it now. you can’t sleep with a woman. everything is with anyone, sing a dog to be. here is the rift today in the world is happening, and he is the main one, that there is something that needs to be cleaned up. so, either to figure it out for half a year, how we go one way or another, the value struggle, whether we will actually save, that’s all, what we have this new impetus for is the project to move on. look, we don’t look into space calculator at all. this is not intelligence. and for some reason we are trying to present and captivate. uh. they considered it offensive to both men and women and in general an issue regarding violence against women. he was, literally

spread. he is under these heels, they trampled. uh, what women have been fighting for for centuries, and about what. e no offense will be said to the men present here. so far they have not been able to decide, and this action showed a lot. uh, how these problems are generally solved, therefore, i think that this is and a role model, but uh, indeed europe today is going exactly in this way uh, i would draw attention to the fact that uh, this is the backbone that we have uh he is in this picture yes, in grodno and if you take a screenshot and place it in european information space, then, probably, they would see that real normal past life, which they have already forgotten a little. and we live in it. we agreed on this matter. evgenievich is a huge value, and uh, what else? i drew attention to the words of alexander yuryevich

, after all, the twentieth year. eh, and we are remembering today, and he here, again, remembered, because we constantly oppose ourselves to the united states of america , was it january 25 of the first year of the united states of america? and storm the capitol, recalls does joseph biden explain this situation today or does he explain it to the population? i don’t remember what happened then, but we can’t remember a single speech by alexander grigorievich when he didn’t say about it in the twentieth year. where is democracy? uh-huh, we are opposed to us, that we are an authoritarian state, we do not work with the population. and this is what we have all the time. thank you for this conversation, but we thank our guests, but we don’t say goodbye in a couple of minutes, a global confrontation with the eyes of former americans marine and scout scott-treater have big and frank conversations. stay with us.

we are continuing right now the conversation that we have been waiting for for a long time events mercilessly, the information war has almost taught us to divide the world into west, east, zeroing out everything in common and focusing solely on differences. so it seemed to us that this is a very narrow view, and we gave up in order to discuss serious topics with people who are on the other side of both the world and the information front, how they look at all this and at us, including those who, like us, want to figure out what brought the world to its present stage of madness. actually, that's why with one of the most famous americans in the russian-language telegram. scott rieter, we talked not so much about current events. how many main watersheds are there between our countries and peoples? so, former american marine and scout scotter hello, mr. ritter, we always follow your

performances with interest. thank you for being with us today thank you for the invitation. ah. ronaldo is now talking to him a lot about the offensive on the ukrainian front, even the terms are called. but as you see the alignment of forces in this confrontation. first, no. there's no doubt that russia is the stronger side, but just because you're stronger doesn't mean flexing your muscles. this is an effective method. at this stage, russia had a certain idea about the nature of this conflicting special military operation. it wasn't an invasion, it wasn't a war , and i think russia was expecting it. that this conflict would end sooner than it turned out, in

fact, russia believed that they could force ukraine to the negotiating table and indeed, russia seems to have succeeded in this endeavor and held three meetings in belarus in gomel and then another in istanbul last year on april 1st. so this could lead to a ceasefire and the entire conflict, but it was nato who intervened and forced ukraine to disagree with this, so the confrontation continues. i do not think that russia immediately adequately reacted to this military supply to ukraine of 50 billion dollars. what made it possible? last autumn's offensive, ukraine recaptured

the kharkov region and kherson, and only in september. er, russia began to respond properly to this new reality , there was a partial mobilization of 300,000 troops and a regrouping of forces. so today we have russia which i believe is capable of winning the war with ukraine and nato they are a special military operation that was carried out for political purposes. they call it a special military operation, but the reality is that today it is largely a war between russia and the collective west, which uses ukraine as an intermediary. and i think, that russia has a chance to win will give washington washington understand this. i mean, what does this mean for ukraine well, do they understand the essence of the ukrainian tragedy? well, i

think russia understands this. i mean, the whole special military operation was designed to minimize harm to the ukrainian people, infrastructure and so on , russia had a problem with the ukrainian government. but this is politics and people should understand that before the start of a special military operation, it is russia and only russia strove for a peaceful outcome. russia insisted on the implementation of the minsk agreements. it was not russia that turned its back on minsk , it was france, it was germany, it was the united states, and even after they turned away, it was russia that was achieving the agreed outcome with these 2021 treaties. you will ignore

met exactly the united states and nato refused to comply with these treaties, therefore , i think this is a tragic situation for russia for which ukraine is a fraternal slavic nation because of their common soviet history of relations between russians and ukrainians. this is such a family level for those same russians who are fighting today, there are ukrainian wives, ukrainian husbands, ukrainian mothers, ukrainian fathers, this is a human tragedy of such a scale that we in the west do not understand, we see it as a conflict, not as a tragedy and who it is, in fact, is . i would like to hear from vasene, how far can this person go in his political ambitions? well, he's the president

of the united states after all, he's reached the top. political ambitions. he announced that he was going to be re-elected. and this means that he adheres to the political directions in which he has already gone . it is very difficult to get re-elected without publicizing his track record. therefore, i think that he will double his efforts on ukraine, double his support for ukraine and will. unfortunately, seek to prolong this conflict. so you know the characters are very important for many russians in the film, daniil bagrov asked this question. that's where the strength is brother from the lord has a clear vision, who has it?

he said that russia is on the right side of history, on the side of truth. the facts you know the fact that we are all human means that we all make mistakes and sit here and say that russia was flawless in the implementation of its policy. it would be absurd human error does not detract from the fact that russia was trying to do the right thing with ukraine. they didn't want this war. they tried to avoid her. you will enter, and during this war, russia sacrificed its own people in an attempt to minimize the consequences conflict for the ukrainian people in the west, that russia sacrificed his people

to save the lives of ukrainians. in general, russia is on the right side of history . the russian cause is a just cause. i think that in this case, the truth will come out. you know, right now the emotions are very, very high and those emotions, especially in the west, are heightened because of the level of ignorance of russia. that's why i think you can't understand it where you are? i don't think you fully understand how much we are here in the united states ignorant about belarus russia ukraine diet of ignorance breeds fear because we are afraid of what we do not understand manipulated by our political leaders to buy into this conflict, but in the end, the truth will come out. we will understand the truth, we will understand the truth about why this war began, how it began,

and who is to blame for this. and i believe that russia, as i said, will be on the right side of history. i have a question just in this case. everyone understands that the war in ukraine will not stop until the washingtons are interested in it, but how ordinary americans see this process. we're really interested. i think we have been led to believe that vladimir putin is a brutal dictator to bring russia back to the glory days of the soviet union that russia wants to become a world power capable of not only being equal to the united states, but also a winner, and therefore, when you tell people this is a fear that existed during

the mccarthy days in the fifties red fear when we were afraid of communism and we used that to justify expansion the us armed forces today is the same. we need an enemy and this enemy of russia we need to create this enemy to justify military spending, to justify the existence of nato. like when someone like me dares to speak up and say, well, wait a minute. why don't we consider? they call you a russian propagandist, a puppet of putin , and they call you a disinformer in this way debate, dialogue and discussion, which in america is the basis of the freedom of speech that

we claim. we support, actually. everything, it is strongly discouraged when it comes to discussing russia and the war in ukraine is a wind. you are a direct person, so you will allow yourself to ask a direct question - enemies for the americans. they can be if america acts like an enemy to russia, i mean that every nation has the right to self-defense and self-preservation and if america positions yourself as a threat to russia then russia is america's enemy not because russia wants to be her enemy, but because we forced russia to be america's enemy but i will say this is that if you extend your hand of friendship and russia she will extend her hand in return shake your hand from countries will be good friends. good partners. russia does not want to be an enemy of the united states but if the united states behaves like an enemy of russia

what russia should do hmm after all a package of sanctions after another and a blow, first of all , to ordinary people, something that not only in belarus or russia, but europeans and americans are also hit on the sidelines. it is obvious. this is one of the problems of ideologically oriented politics, because we consider russia and, as a result, belarus as an enemy. you know when you're in conflict the last thing you want is for me to see you as a fellow and identify with you as a human being, because then my humanity kicks in and i say why. i want to make you suffer. this is

the last thing a person should want to do to another person. therefore, in order to justify this policy of sanctions, we must degunize you and the first thing we do is attack your leadership, because in the west we believe in the principles of democracy, according to which, ironically, free and independent people do not choose bad people as their leaders. i know we may be doing so well here in the united states and europe but look at your leaders and then as a consequence we attack you don't be surprised, and so we can go along with the imposition of sanctions, because we accuse you of having poor leadership. we say it's your fault . the blame of the people on your leaders, so we have no sympathy for the suffering we 've caused. and if you want to end suffering. you must change your leadership. so this approach is precisely why the most dangerous thing that can happen from the point of view of american and european politicians. this is what i am having a discussion with you about

treats you as equals as a person, because treating you as a person. i expose the soulless nature of the american european. policies of sanctions against the peoples of belarus russia although we may have made your life uncomfortable. and i believe that sanctions did it. you are not suffering europe is suffering. these sanctions backfired harming him by not achieving the desired results in russia is the problem of democracy. democracy. the whole world, watching hollywood films, is watching the life of your stars, eating hamburgers, drinking pepsi, but hardly it can be called love for america. i 'll try to explain, i don't know if this is felt in the usa itself, but the main thing is that it irritates americans abroad. this is a dictation, something that

allows itself in washington, because it does not allow anyone more time. the russian point of view or the american one, i'm talking about the american point of view. well, from a theoretical point of view, i should be surprised , because america is supposed to stand for the right of the individual individual freedoms, and we should respect sovereignty, but the reality is that we act differently. it's real ok sir. rita i feel i should clarify my question. i ask him no, in order to somehow hurt your patriotic feelings. if you are an american it is logical that you love your country. understandably, my question is about something else . all this is important, because america still held number one today. and this is not only

a right, but also a great responsibility. well , i'm sure you agree with that. right, but that's what i'm trying to convey, for example, let's look at what joe biden says as president. he says that our the best export is democracy american democracy but what are we exporting? as you noticed democracy is not defined by hollywood soda or clothing democracy is more intuitive and democracy. this is a principled position principles that speak of the empowerment of the individual for the benefit of the collective for everyone on the planet for all the moment that all this was created for the united states american democracy was built

american history a unique american history that cannot be reproduced nowhere else. so when we talk about american democracy. it is the product of an imperfect history. remember when we signed our constitution we had slavery, when we signed our constitution women didn't have the right to vote. we had to grow as a nation, and we waged war not only against england but also a civil war against ourselves. we have a civil rights movement that is against inequality in how we treat people of color here in the united states and we're still dealing with these problems with these historical problems that define who we are and what we are. so our democracy is aimed at solving american problems. how can we take this and insist that you and belarus follow the american model, our model is based on our history, if democracy is really possible in belarus, it should follow

the belarusian model, starting from the history of belarus, the same with russia, it can be a democracy. it will be a democracy belarusian face, reflecting belarusian values ​​and principles, and they will be different from ours and we must accept that the rest of the world cannot and will not live like a mirror projection of the united states and this is biden's failure, because we cannot export democracy democracy should grow from the inside in each side. we must encourage this growth, but in order to do so, we must respect differences. and america does not do this, because, as it were , they correctly noticed. we dictate. we don't lend a helping hand. we don't offer it. we dictate decisions, no nation wants to be dictated to and finally. i'd like to ask, that's what it's kind of weird about. well, right now we both communicate easily, discuss complex topics, many of

our political countries. that's definitely not friends, but rest, what prevents you from hearing each other? uh, you know i'd say you can hear me well enough? i believe that belarus is heard well enough, the united states and i do not think that this is a problem with belarus, this does not mean that we cannot be disagreement. they may be they are and it is quite logical am. well, you know, the key aspect of disagreement is the ability to communicate and work your way through problems to a solution that is fair for both parties. but for this to happen, it's not only that you hear me, it's just what america does, we say and insist that you listen, and then we insist that you act on what we say, what we don't do. so we don't take time out and

listen to what you have to say not hearing what you have to say and not acting on what you have to say communication should be a two way street and right now the united states is out of touch. we dictate and you cannot solve this problem. you know one of the things i've always said is that you can't solve a problem. if you don't first define it exactly, because if you don't know what the problem is, the solution is no. right now the problem is that you have wisely noticed. it's the lack of communication in this the problem between the united states and belarus the united states and russia we don't communicate effectively enough , but you see the us doesn't recognize this because we think that we communicate ineffectively, that we tell you what we want from you. well, what we don't do is complete the rest of the equation, which is to listen to what you have to say , treat it with respect, and come up with

a mutually acceptable solution to the problem. mr. ridder thank you very much for being with us good luck and we hope for new meetings. thank you very much. thank you. have a nice day. well, this is how the conversation turned out, as it often happens, everyone saw something of their own in it, but as for me, this is another illustration of those forces for which democracy is only a screen, behind which there is no place, neither humanism, nor friendship of peoples, nor more a project, like a victory over poverty or a breakthrough into deep space for this vile, but very influential rude. alien life just a resource or a hindrance from here to the view, like a new plague, transgender sodom and artificial intelligence, like a wolf in a sheep's skin. it's not even an experiment anymore. this is some kind of war started without our knowledge, and both sides have something to lose in it, but if for them it is capital, then for

billions of others it is a matter of being. in the most christian sense, it looks like just such a battle is going on now and something tells us that few people succeed in being just a spectator in this global battle. thanks for being happy with us.

in the new edition of the polishhuki project, the talented wood carver alexander severs expressions that are both inside and outside the house. made. what is called do-it-yourself, according to its sketches, according to its drawings, a drawing speaks modestly about its works, when they offer then and do exhibitions for a long time, all these products that were made were here on the spot, but, well, people came and looked already at him. we can say that they said that you show people the reviews were positive, dense admiration, together with alexander vladimirovich, we will walk around the outskirts of the city of gangtsevichi and refresh the facts in our memory, from the life of the belarusian classic

of literature, a new issue of the poles project. here the school exists in the museum at one time. i had to connect to this somewhat in order to carry out, as i usually do, brew live exhibits, that is, those things, uh , that yakubkov used during his lifetime, watch on thursday on belarus 24 tv channel . the history of our ukraine is folded and a diverse history, and to separate from the gestora of childbirth, so the goat is pokhlebsky, to assimilate the hour. uh, divided into two kalinas, we will recognize them for the architectural supporters of belarus, in front of us, they are, uh, the architecture of the undershirt of the eighteenth one hundred and eight of ours construction.

it went on very slowly, because it took as many as five years to make only the foundations and dungeons of this temple, we will show a unique place from that god from supposedly yana amal, the unknown architect of belarus on the belarus 204 tv channel. how did the story begin?