freight traffic traffic police checks commercial vehicles. drivers are required to provide the necessary documents, insurance, traffic permits and waybills, the vehicle itself must be technically sound, special emphasis on the braking system and steering , traffic safety directly depends on this. the central part of the city of minsk mainly. e heavy transport. there's movement prohibited, so please pay attention to road signs pests e, and be polite to other road users . belaya rus became a political party with a certificate of registration and the charter was presented by the minister of justice sergey khamenenko. the decision to create the belarusian party, belarus was made on march 18. at the founding congress in minsk , the party's program touches on the improvement of social issues of pension provision , the availability of education and medical care. our main efforts will now be sent

to ensure that in every region of our country. each region had regional branches. this will dramatically increase the efficiency of our work, as we will be able to bring management decisions from the center to the regions and cover the entire country with our activities. secondly, we will soon walk through the building of the supreme political council, where we will approve a number of normative documents regulating the activities of our party. and what is most important for me, we will put the issue of forming a work plan on the agenda hello everyone who is now with us in studios olga lazurkina and oleg gaidukevich. i

salute you. well, later our conversation with the american military expert scott rieter, as it seems, the problem of peace from that side turned out very frankly. i immediately recommend that from the same side of the atlantic all the main processes directly or indirectly today rest against the ukrainian front, large-scale defense exercises have started, 23 experts in one vote. they say, expect provocations around transnistria, crimea and belarus, and such information appears the other day, the newspaper lemon reports france refused to help ukraine with the planning of combat missions on the territory of belarus kiev requested a digital map of belarus in paris, this would allow ukrainian aircraft to fly over the country at ultra-low altitudes, according to the lemont. and i could plan the route and departure in advance, taking into account the terrain in france, it was announced that they would not participate in the operation of ukraine on the territory of other states. here is alexander sergeevich

what do you think about this when you hear such plans hmm ukraine fine i understand that this threatens with very serious provocations, which can lead not only to an escalation of the conflict in ukraine, but to drawing the whole of europe into this conflict, why the macron had such a reaction. it would seem that europe lies in the united states of america of sovereignty, no, all the decisions that are made in the white house europe takes under the hood and executes, despite the fact that it actually hits its national interests on all economic political issues of national security, but on the other hand. even so. even there, despite the lack of sovereignty, there is understanding. what the escalation with belarus can lead to, after all, it will not be possible to draw belarus alone into the war , for example, the president spoke about this more than once in his message.

if they draw in belarus, the whole of europe is drawn in, this is no longer a special one, the military operation will already use all the forces and capabilities that the union state has in europe and what europe understands this will lead to, but i see that you don’t question what is being reported here is a french newspaper cozy, does not mean after moreover, 100%, moreover, i am convinced that kiev is fulfilling the will of the united states. and what is the will of the united states to prolong the conflict as long as possible? more blood should be shed ukrainian resources. they're exhaustible we see now, what's going on at the front? we see that the most combat-ready units of the armed forces, which have been preparing for many years, are simply being crushed by the russian troops. it's a matter of time, what's next? how to support this conflict, how to make it break out, we need new countries, we need new victims, who do they have the baltics, but this only rhetoric, they don't have a human resource,

a lot of rhetoric, as they are called on the internet by the great three. lithuania latvia estonia causing laughter, which the poles can only bark, there is this time, but on the other hand. i would very much like to draw in the dream, belarus was always directed at this by their policy to destroy our state from the inside, to make it here at the beginning of the civil war, and then i’ll throw all this at russia, after some time it didn’t work out. so it is necessary to provoke, therefore he claims that kiev applied for by such data not only to france to all the west. well, we see that, apparently , france has refused other silence. this suggests that exactly 100% of the baldivian baltic countries will relax, poland will give any. we are well aware of the data that ukraine will request, and here there is only one criterion, which is the country that has more sovereignty. she does not agree to this, although france lies under the united states but still it is the founding country of the european union, like germany, it is the main country of the big

big three of the eu. well, look at lithuania his. look how interesting it turns out. hmm , what is the zelensky regime terrible now and why do you have to listen to such information with which we started discussing today with maximum tension, but listen, because they have barbaric logic. look what just recently said, the adviser to the head of zelensky's office podolak. he said that ukraine has the right to destroy everything that is in the crimea and donbass , it seems. wait all the time. shout that this is your land crimea donbass and you want to destroy everything amazingly barbaric logic, which is being broadcast now, kiev officially. i think this is the logic of war in the first place. we should treat it this way, but still i would doubt that paris single-handedly made such a decision regarding the digital map of belarus. i think that this is a correctly presented informational message with a simulated one. i would

watch everything here, two signals, first of all , that preventing the spread of the expansion of the conflict remains extremely important for the european union at this stage and the position of france is demonstrated, as well as the second very important signal, the firmness of the position. uh, and uh, the determination of the response from belarus is finally realized in europe or there, and therefore this message is so wide. uh, circulated in the press. i think it's also important who you think. that's what kind of game france is playing right now. we see that what is m-m such a fickle, unstable in this regard, but a macron. here he rides this bideno and says, we are brothers in arms in the war for ukraine, he returns from beijing and says that now in europe there is no need to fight for taiwan in general, we should not follow the american format, then he says this. our task is to help ukraine survive. by all means. do not let russia win, do not allow the expansion

of this conflict. that's what kind of game and that's the most important thing, who is playing this game with my hands. and i think that, uh, this situation , how it is connected with the fact that we evaluate solidarity a little from our point of view , it’s all about solidarity because it could, when they have solidarity, yes, and we, uh, we see it only in our understanding and more in belarusian, but there are other options. there is a belarusian version, indeed, it is built, uh on the position uh. a union of like-minded people with a very high share of responsibility on a global scale. and there is another well-known for us. e point of view. this is us already we will simply express the tobacco, apart and in fact the macron demonstrates it today, but i would pay attention to one more thing that hides paris and the macron a lot, and in particular, but paris is today

between fires. these are the sanctions of the united states of america, these are retaliatory measures from china and russia, and without restraint. the protectionism that is spreading across europe is why all the actions of the macron are aimed at somehow surviving this fight that is unfolding today. they don’t want to introduce it to us in the information space yet , but it exists and this is all the subtleties of french foreign policy, we are talking about survival, in general europe for today is all, and not just france and the problems of the european union a huge amount and in general a priori , the macroru very often assessed the internal audience, which must be shown at least something that he defends national interests. the french, after all, everything that the macro says is actually discussed in europe, and so why are we helping ukraine, why are we supplying weapons? why do we need a war? take care of french problems, sort out, in the end , the mountains of garbage that lie in the city with migrants. nobody cares about the problem. only grows. well, there is one more aspect

that i would like to mention. we we should never believe a word more what european politicians say, so that they do not tell us. we don't want escalation, we don't want war, we will never attack. we don't want war with russia not to believe a single word. we must remember one simple thing - they will have the slightest opportunity to attack and destroy. they will know that there will be no answer, they will know that there will be nothing behind this, just as there was nothing in yugoslavia for this in libya, there was nothing for this in syria in iraq, which means they will attack and destroy in the name of democracy and freedom, and all the belarusians who will die here. they'll say no big deal. this is for the great bright future, so not believing a single word is the only way to prevent war being strong, therefore the president is right, when now is over. for all these years, especially the last year, he pays a huge amount of attention not in words to issues of national security and

our military power, and i am not afraid of this word, but in fact today we actually pushed the war aside. it was very easy to push them away rhetoric nor their promise less than their words, and the fact that today our military potential has increased significantly, and after the deployment of tactical nuclear weapons. this step, uh, will push the war back for a long time, let's discuss it, and here it ends the topic. this one. as olga igorievna correctly said, solidarity is what seems to us to be solidarity here in the west, judging by everything. it looks like the united states is outraged, and the fact that they broadcast to the general public and paris and brussels along with it. talking during a phone call bytes, planted a macron for the post-beijing theses, but this conflict was expressed most clearly with the president of the american heritage foundation, kharitovich. fandasha is the most influential factory of american thought by james krafan. here is the magazine current trust published an article where he actually

threatens to reconsider the status of the united states as the leading donor of ukraine, it is necessary to demand others from france. the partners of the report who and how helped kiev and until the eu reports the us should not send money to ukraine. so this is the environment and the owner. here and the whole policy is shifted again and again. here is the notorious counterattack that they cannot agree among themselves how they will divide further and because of this, too, but one more thing must be said, the americans are now destroying the european economy every month. they put her on a gas needle, which means they put her on an american needle on an industrial needle. now many european enterprises are moving to other countries. many strive, including in the usa. that is, today they have planted europe on themselves, that is , they will lose the economic sovereignty of europe, respectively, such

statements can be made to scare europe because, like ukraine, let's not fantasize, but think about the further development of the situation. today there is no ukraine. as a state, because it is completely dependent on western aid, will there be or europe after some time? i 'm not talking about now, if such a policy continues, what will happen to the european economy in 5 years, in 6 years of sanctions , in 6 years of complete dependence on america, what will it be with her? i'm afraid that germany, uh, france will not be pulled out on itself. do they really not understand this burden of europe? is it now giving them, uh, independence. well, look, there is a statement from here. we see that, on the one hand, the united states is saying in plain text to its partners there, in the asian region, in south korea, first of all, reduce the supply of microchips with china. and this is 300 billion dollars of turnover between south korea and china, and the same thing, say now to the european union and all trade with europe

china, how much there is 850 billion dollars , you can understand why they do not want to burn bridges. and why such it would seem large? the gift of the power in economic terms is so powerless. that's true, how is your salon? well, i wouldn’t say completely vassal positions of europe, of course, there is, but the only thing is that they have relaxed since the forty-fifth year and are used to receiving this kind of subsidies and living in such a stable world, but the financial world, but then what did you say about. here are the editions of national intels. after all, this is the formula that once trump put forward this was the first question after he came to power, to which he asked her in europe how long we will support you , then it's time to invest in your security. and today it is already a question. e of ukraine do they understand this in europe, of course, sensible european analysts from the very beginning of the conflict in ukraine

say that europe should go on its own track, and what the macron said, these are not just his words. but macron is forced to protect not only the interests of those he represents, but also, uh, he is president of france so he's limited but i think there's an even more important undercurrent right now besides this fuss that we're seeing between the us uh and europe because uh, the globalization that we've seen economic and interconnectedness and the transformation that it's caused in the economy in the political landscape, it has two sides. eh, what we see for the golden billion is enrichment and the second very important side. after all, the club of elite powers and those schemes that used to enrich the influence, which were hidden. they have become available to a large number of states, and if earlier, and the countries of asia in the middle east watched the behavior of their partners, the united states and the european

union, today they are asking european analysts a question. this is noted they ask the question of whether e is connected. states of america european union have reached such heights due to their own potential or have we allowed them to do it and i am convinced that today the number of those who ask the second part of the question is already much larger than the number of those countries that, uh expressed their desire. recently it was reported to join the brix most arab emirates saudi arabia many added across europe another very important point. why are we now talking about it, it is not a sovereign history. everything just means a lot, e in the ninety-first year, soviet troops left eastern europe, american nowhere. didn't leave. this is the first reason it all started with this, because the americans then took control of europe and wanted to take all the post-soviet space under control, and then russia missed the baltic states

ukraine has missed a number of other countries, we need to talk about this, and then the economy is financial control. who is in control? the largest enterprises in the european union where are the owners behind the ribbon in america next, and who controls the elections in the european union? or we can now say that the americans do not interfere in european elections as much as they interfere, and in some countries, such as poland, elections are key for them for the further development of europe, elections in poland will be held now they interfere. biden's visit is already here. in warsaw, he was not only connected with ukraine, he was connected, including with pre-election poland, he clearly gave a signal. what kind of poland does the usa need? well, the president of poland picked up this slogan, saying more america to europe . that's all politics. let's talk about safety. the story of britain's plans to deliver shells with combined

uranium to ukraine, it seems, as a whole series was continued. the media published, uh, the answer of the deputy minister of defense of great britain, james hippie , to a parliamentary inquiry, in which he gives to understand that, in fact , about 2,000 shells for challenger 2 tanks have already been delivered to ukraine there, among which there are also ammunition with combined uranium. and when they started, well, on the contrary, apparently ask questions. and what about the future with these shells, what about responsibility, two most revealing quotes from the deputy minister of defense of great britain he said for reasons of operational security. we will not comment on the usage rates of the supplied kits and the second in the uk is non-binding to eliminate the consequences of the use of shells with combined uranium in ukraine, that is, such friends, ukraine does not need scorched fields at all. i think such informational messages.

they appear in connection with the widely advertised counter-offensive large offensive, which is now expected in april in may, that is, these deadlines in june are constantly postponed and uh, this is the heat on the information agenda, it must definitely be today . these are irresponsible statements. they're just uh in order to create tension in belarus as well, because if we follow this whole chain, even because we discussed today. uh, this is clearly, as it were , traced, uh, and belarus, russia should prepare for a serious conflict, because the counteroffensive is in the form that the information agenda is presented to us. it should be of the west, but destroying everything, that is, the situation will be completely reversed. uh, it’s natural that we are, as in soviet times, as well as ahead of the cold war, we begin to reflect, that is, we,

we rearm, we spend huge amounts of human resources, we spend huge financial resources in order to confront what we don’t know, this creates tension in society, because today work is going on, on the one hand, on the well front, and on the other hand, for the population, including americans , when the bomb was thrown into japan on hiroshima nagasaki recently, an american official stood in japan and was even afraid to say that it was the usa yes, he says, this, of course, is a tragedy. and who answered for this tragedy, and who will answer for the mutilated iraqi children? what kind of shells were used in iraq, how many children after that were ill with oncological diseases? how many people yes, how many people destroyed 1 million 200 iraqs died, who will come with responsibility, so uh, this official here in the uk does not care about them. who cares? how will europe be radioactively contaminated. but this will affect europe and not only ukraine, the wind will be different, therefore, of course. it's scary and different in a different

way. how to win russia has no sergeevich today making a decision to place our territory of tactical nuclear weapons. this is a weapon of prudence not only deterrence, but prudence for those who hatch such plans in time to save europe from a big war. they should rejoice that today we are deploying tactical nuclear weapons. and why rejoice, because the americans who command europe will also think three times what command to give? do not touch this belarus, they will say one by one simple. the reason we're not here is sitting across the ocean. if suddenly a negative scenario begins, therefore we have never threatened anyone, everyone knows this very well. this is a lie that is being poured on belarus that we seem to be unable to help but ask. in this case, here, of course, is such a significant date for us, hmm, another anniversary of the chernobyl tragedy. it has always been a political theme for the belarusian opposition, absolutely always. but this time they seem to have spit on themselves , they managed to connect this day on april 26 with the deployment of tactical nuclear

weapons by belarus. here's how you listen to it. do you remember how they associated this day with construction of a nuclear power plant. belarusian they have everything we do, for the country, for the state, for its security , for the development of the economy, everything is bad. at the same time , everything that others do is good. lithuania is placing nuclear waste on the border with belarus. wonderful. poland will build a nuclear power plant construction, which means that lithuania will want to build, build, this is the politicization of the chernobyl theme. this use is solely for the purpose of pr, they do not care about this belarusian people, they do not care about these our polluted territories. they never go there have gone. who was lukashenka? lukashenka has not been afraid to go there every year since the beginning of his presidency. i didn’t just go around defending programs, which means that when the supreme soviet was still strong, i remember, when power was not presidential. he then cursed with advice so that the money would go there, so that people

would support this help. uh, affected region. this is real politics. and this is the usual pr to walk around the center, the minsk cleavage and the bell. rubbish would be removed. i remember on the main streets. eh, papers. we collected they would have taken a rake, and they are 30 years old, a bell, disguised, a fool for a priest, and they go with this bell, they ring, and then they turn the cars over. i remember my first chernobyl hat. i am a cadet of the academy of the ministry of internal affairs , the anniversary of the chernobyl tragedy me without a helmet without a helmet. send without anything. i didn’t know what it was, maybe there is a convoy. luna aunzo, overturns cars and us cadets, by the way, stood with me in the army. mikhailovich was then a cadet of the academy, eden we recently remembered and they throw stones at us. it's called honor chernobyl memory. this is what you are doing so nothing has changed now. now they will walk. just the truth in the middle. warsaw does not look like much that does not pass through paris . let it be like they will come, then the police will arrange for them there. they will see. what is

nuclear democracy and, uh, france, which is largely based on nuclear power plants , you don’t go like that. by the way, olga igorevna , oleg sergeevich raised an interesting idea that , indeed, it may be that the time has come when for us april 26 is not only the time memory of this tragedy, but also a certain symbol of the revival of belarus, contrary to in the name of contrary to all forecasts, that is, more work allowed to revive these lands. although many did not believe that this was possible, especially in such a time frame and in the name, well, in the name of the present, in addition to the fact that children on those lands could live here, and we see that this was possible. that is, maybe it's really time to rebuild attitudes to this day, not to those events, but to this day. i think that it has already been rebuilt in belarus. i think that at the level of simple of people. uh, this is what you are talking about, it is just connected with the future, not with the past with those events that were but with the future, but for the information agenda

, alekseevich absolutely agrees, the key word is nuclear everything, as if everything is built around it, e, is built . and i think that maybe we need to pay a little less attention to them and work on our agenda. after all, we have formed it. we have certain relationships. we remember this date. we know what she has to do with us and, uh, a certain event is always lined up, you can’t all time to live in the paradigm that we want to prove something to someone, we need to prove it and go develop it with our man. it could be you unintentionally. you are absolutely right. i agree with you that you really need to build your native and your path and your strategy for creation. but here you involuntarily, probably, pull yourself up and draw parallels with the twentieth year and look and understand that if everything went well and so, you could be here a force for which it would, naturally, close projects on which the direct rewrite is built, we see in other states, moldova , the baltic states, ukraine, that is, they are instead

, for example, to build an education system there. they destroy the old ones. here we are now, for example, we are discussing only how they will remake momentary chants to link the incomparable, deterrence weapons and, for example, the chernobyl tragedy but we see how history is being rewritten. here, thinking about it. we recently recalled the speech of the permanent representative of russia to the un not benzia, who, using a specific example, told what it was all about. can reach. i will ask you now to show a fragment, the total adaptation of the educational process and the rewriting of joint pages with the history of the russian and ukrainian people, the ministry of education and science of ukraine is engaged in the most ambitious adjustments. were subjected to a program in history and geography. i even took it with me. a geography textbook for the eighth grade , edited by a muslim and copied, if you believe him, then the ancestors of the french, spaniards , portuguese, turks, and even jews came from ukraine i want to turn to my

french colleague. nicolas, you knew that you were actually ukrainian. don't believe. read the textbook. i took it from there in it iron logic. since the ancestors of the french are gals, they came from galina, which is in ukraine. do you know that, according to the author of the textbook , the ukrainians, the poles are of slavic origin, and the russians of the countess are denied the slavic status of belarusians, they were attributed to the baltic peoples. that is why, when here you observe here what they sometimes try to tie to our events. here involuntarily you think. how far it can go from ridiculous and ridiculous to apparently. ukraine today in this reality is history should not be humiliated to the point that you get bogged down in modern cuts, but uh it ’s dangerous because it’s not that this

information space is being thrown in, the danger lies in the fact that we can join this discussion, as soon as we pull. here in this discussion, then at the end, as a rule, only this foam, which we have chosen today, will remain. it will be if we follow the path of proving that we slavs will begin to remember our sources , and so on, then it is extremely important for them to draw you into this discussion, which is absolutely meaningless, because it will be broken. uh, any story you invite from belarus will do it with ease. i think even for 5 minutes, but uh, important to them. this is precisely what is very important for us today not to drag it into it. unfortunately, propaganda does not interest the historian of opinion. and today, today, we are watching this story. and i open the internet from these, that we are balts - this is from everyone. e extremist

telegram channel. it is carried on purpose and will be carried because the youth who watch tiktok short information. she won't wait for the story. today there is an information war. we have already passed the period of time when we sat in belarus , including saying that everything is fine, let's talk only about a good agenda. let's talk only about our achievements. this will never happen again. then they themselves will explain everything to people for us, and we will lose the information war. today we are working on lead. we will debunk their fakes, we will say that they are liars, we will show that they are lying and the youth hears us. i see it. now driving around the country to work. we need tension and not let them seize the initiative from us. today we get it about security, and the other day in grodno there was a picture that made it possible to visually, but look at who the country protects in the first place. i propose now

to watch a fragment of this spontaneous meeting on the street of grodno please, well, girls on disk do you invite them or they don't go to your discotheque? well, please, in the twentieth year, it's okay, comrades. let's do everything possible. here we have children leaving, why are you looking like that? he

'll have to, thanks guys. all the best. live peacefully. goodbye. true, they paid attention to what the president said when he left a few minutes earlier at the meeting with the president in grodno. what did he say to an official that it’s better to fight in the field than there and it’s clear which one was meant there, and leaving here he said, live peacefully to ordinary people, that is, oleg sergeevich turns out. this is the formula for our security to work and live in the world. you understand how many people envy us. they are actually jealous. i've been here when in the donbass and in other countries , they envy us. that's when you look at these shots, when there are four of these big weekends. you see these queues at the cemetery. you see how people clean up the graves of the world of the sun. this is how the soul rejoices, but you still understand what is behind this, and behind this is painstaking work of the president of the security forces. i

remember his words on the message. here i have defined this for myself as the installation: you work and protect your family, and we will protect the country with the military, the president spoke about this in his message. it hit me very hard and these right words need to be worked on. we must really work at our workplace to defend our homeland. and then we have these peaceful days, the sunny days that were here these weekends will always be worth a lot. these are the children, these are the young men. e girls who approach the president are happy with their children. they live happily. they may not understand how happy they are not seeing what is happening, there aleksey sergeevich fulfilled the messages themselves. we all remember your questions that were asked and we talk a lot today about values. here, let's talk a little bit about western values, literally a touch. uh, western values ​​that shine and thank god, and in canada, ministers from justin trudeau's cabinet staged a fashion show in parliament in women's pink high-heeled shoes and that's it. this

they dedicated a quote to support women who are being abused. i don't know why i remember it now. it seemed to me that they wanted to see again that he had slept with a woman. here is poor trump if he was gay or a transvestite and they would sue everyone who would unite him with something. that's the kind of world they have , a man can't sleep with a woman. all. here with anyone. sing the dog is sleeping. uh, with kids. you can sell him to pedophiles. we understand it is impossible. so, maybe this fault is happening in the world today and it is the main one, that there is something that needs to be cleared. here, or to figure it out to the fullest, we move on, continues the orthodox church in ukraine, yes. this is the last on what rests, probably, european civilization. and they want to remove it and you are right. there is a struggle going on not only between the west, but also between russia and russia, there is a struggle of values, whether we will actually save, that's all, everything

that we believed in and our ancestors. i know what else i'm sure. god sees everything and god is on our side. here, indeed. we need this new push project to move on. look, we don't look into space at all. we rushed when we are now playing with this artificial intelligence. he never once had intelligence. the machine counts. it's just a highly advanced calculator. this is not intelligence. and for some reason we are trying to imagine, to get carried away to fall under the spell that he will someday replace something about us, not understanding how we ourselves are degrading. that's what we really need in order to somehow go further and not get lost, for the sake of which all this hmm drew his attention to the reaction of canadian society itself, you see both women and the men strongly condemned this action. they considered it offensive to both men and women and in general an issue regarding violence against women. he was e, he literally flattened himself under these heels, they trampled. uh, what women have been fighting for for centuries, and about

what. e no offense will be said to the men present here. so far they have not been able to decide, and this action showed a lot. uh, how are these issues generally handled, so i don't think it's a role model. but uh, really europe today, it is on the same path. uh, i would draw attention to the fact that this is the backbone that we have e he is in this picture yes, in grodno and if you take a screenshot and place it in the european information space, then, probably, they would see that past life real normal, which they have already forgotten a little. and we live in it. well, this idea was accepted if it was of great value, and uh, what else? i paid attention to the words. after all, alexander yuryevich, uh, the twentieth year, uh, and. today we remember and he is here, again remembered, because in the united states of america

we constantly oppose ourselves and the united states of america was their january, 21 years, the storming of the capitol, does joseph biden today remember this situation and explain it to the population? i don’t remember what happened then, but we can’t remember a single speech by alexander grigorievich when he didn’t say about it in the twentieth year, where we oppose democracy, that we are an authoritarian state, we don’t work with the population. and this is what we have all the time. thanks for this conversation, but we thank our guests, but we don’t say goodbye in a couple of minutes to the global confrontation with the eyes of the americans by a former marine and scout scott-triter big and frank conversations. stay with us. we are continuing right now the conversation that we have been waiting for a long time for events mercilessly,

the information war has almost taught us to divide the world into west, east, zeroing out everything in common and focusing exclusively on differences. so it seemed to us that this is a very narrow view, and we gave up in order to discuss serious topics with people who, on a different side of both the world and the information front, how they look at all this, including us , who, like us, want to figure out what led the world to the current stage of insanity. actually, that's why with one of the most famous americans in the russian-language telegram. scott rieter we talked not so much about current events. how many main watersheds are there between our countries and peoples? so, a former american marine and scout scotter hello, mister rhetor, we always follow your speeches with interest. thank you for being with us today thank you for the invitation. ah. ronaldo is

now talking to him a lot about the offensive on the ukrainian front, even the terms are called. and how do you see the balance of power in this confrontation? there is no doubt that russia is the stronger side, but just because you are stronger does not mean that you are flexing your muscles. this is an efficient method. i think at an early stage. russia had a certain idea about the nature of this conflict in a special military operation. it wasn't an invasion. this was not a war. i think russia expected. what is this conflict ends sooner than it turned out, in fact, russia believed they could get ukraine to the negotiating table and

indeed, russia seems to have succeeded in this endeavor with three meetings in belarus in gomel and then another in istanbul last year on april 1st tambov, it could have led to a ceasefire and the entire conflict, but it was nato that intervened and forced ukraine to disagree with this, so the confrontation continues, that russia immediately adequately responded to this with military supplies to ukraine of $ 50 billion. what made it possible? the onset of last autumn, when ukraine recaptured the kharkov region and kherson, and only in september. er,

russia began to respond properly to this new reality, there was a partial mobilization of 300,000 troops and a regrouping of forces. so today we have russia which i believe is capable of winning the war with ukraine and nato they are a special military operation that was carried out for political purposes. they call it a special military operation, but the reality is that today it is in to a large extent a war between russia and the collective west, which uses ukraine as intermediaries. and i think that russia has a chance to win with washington washington understands this, i mean, what does this mean for ukraine do they understand the essence of the ukrainian tragedy? i think russia understands this, i mean that the whole special

military operation was designed to minimize the damage to the ukrainian people , infrastructure and so on, russia had a problem with the ukrainian government. but this politicians and people must understand that before the start of the special military operation, it was russia and only russia that sought a peaceful outcome. russia insisted on the implementation of the minsk agreements. it was not russia that turned its back on minsk, it was france, it was germany , it was the united states, and even after they turned away, it was russia that was achieving the agreed outcome with these 2021 treaties. you will ignore met exactly the united states and nato refused to abide by these treaties, so i

think this is a tragic situation for russia for which ukraine is a fraternal slavic nation because of their common soviet history of relations between russians and ukrainians. this is such a family level for those same russians who are fighting today, there are ukrainian wives, ukrainian husbands, ukrainian mothers, ukrainian fathers, this is a human tragedy of such a scale that we in the west do not understand, we see it as a conflict, not as a tragedy a which is essentially what it is . i would like to hear from you how far this man can go in his political ambitions? well, he's the president of the united states after all, he's reached the pinnacle of political ambition. he announced that

he was going to be re-elected. and this means that he adheres to the political directions in which he has already gone . it is very difficult to get re-elected without publicizing his track record. therefore, i think that he will double his efforts on ukraine, double his support for ukraine and will. unfortunately, seek to prolong this conflict. very important for many russians in the film, danila bagrov asked this question. what is the power to take? clear who has the vision?

i have repeatedly said that russia is on the right side of history on the side of truth. you know that we are all human beings, that means that we all make mistakes and sit here and talk about what russia was, flawless in the implementation of its policy. it would be absurd human error does not detract from the fact that russia was trying to do the right thing with ukraine. they didn't want this war. they tried to avoid russia sacrificing its own people in an attempt to minimize the effects of the conflict on the ukrainian people of the west. in general, from the site, russia is on

the right side of history. the russian cause is a just cause. and i think that in this case, the truth will come out. you know, right now the emotions are very, very high and those emotions , especially in the west, are heightened because of the level of ignorance of russia. that's why i think you can't understand it where you are? i don't think you fully understand how ignorant we are here in the united states about belarus russia ukraine and this ignorance breeds fear because we are afraid of what we don't understand. this fear is being manipulated by our political leaders to buy into this conflict, but eventually the truth will come out. we will understand the truth, we will understand the truth about why this war began, how it began, and who is to blame for this. and i believe that russia, as i said, will be on the right side

of history. i have a question just in this case. everyone understands that the war in ukraine will not stop until the washingtons are interested in it, but how ordinary americans see this process. us the truth interesting. how to win, russia was led to believe that vladimir putin is a cruel dictator who seeks to return russia to the glory days of the soviet union that russia wants to become a world power capable of not only being equal to the united states, but also winning and therefore, when you tell people, it is you who generate fear that existed in the fifties red fear, when

we were afraid of communism, and we used it to justify the expansion of the american military and this enemy of russia we need to create this enemy to justify our exorbitant military spending, to justify the existence of nato. so in the united states, uh, i think you would be shocked at how this happens, it's not much discussed, because at that moment, for example, when someone like me dares to speak up and say, well wait a minute. why don't we consider? it is you who are called a russian propagandist, a puppet of putin , and you are called disinformers, so the debate is a dialogue and discussion that is in america are the foundation of freedom of speech, which we claim. we support, actually. that's it, this is categorically not encouraged when it comes to discussing russia and

the war in ukraine, mr. viktor, you are a direct person, so you will allow yourself to ask a direct question - enemies for the americans. they can be if america acts like an enemy to russia, i mean that every nation has the right to self-defense and self-preservation and if america positions itself as a threat to russia then russia is america's enemy not because russia wants to be her enemy, but because we forced russia to be america's enemy but i will say this is that if you extend your hand of friendship and russia she will extend her hand in return shake your hand and the countries will be good friends. good partners. russia does not want to be an enemy of the united states but if the united states behaves like an enemy of russia what should russia do hmm after all why do washington

partners in the eu just enjoy imposing one package of sanctions after another strike, first of all to ordinary people, and not only in belarus or russia, but even europeans and americans are being beaten along the roadsides. this is one of the problems of ideologically oriented politics, because we consider russia and, as a result, belarus as an enemy. you know, when you are in conflict, the last thing you want is for me to see you as a fellow, identify with you, as a human being, because then my humanity kicks in and i tell you why i want to hurt you. this the last thing a person should want to do to another person. therefore, in order to justify this policy of sanctions, we must dehumanize

you and the first thing we do is attack your leadership, because in the west we believe in the principles of democracy, according to which, ironically, free and independent people do not choose bad people as their leaders. i know we may be doing so well here in the united states and europe but look at your leaders and then as a consequence we will attack you don't be surprised and so we we can agree to the imposition of sanctions, because we accuse you of having poor leadership. we say it's your fault . the blame of the people on your leaders, so we have no sympathy for the suffering we 've caused. and if you want to end suffering. you must change your leadership. so this approach is precisely why the most dangerous thing that can happen from the point of view of american and european politicians. it is that i have a discussion with you in which you are treated as an equal as to a person, because i treat you like a

person. i expose the soulless nature of the american european. policies of sanctions against the peoples of belarus russia and then we do not notice the irony that although we may have made your life uncomfortable, and i believe that sanctions did it you do not suffer europe suffers these sanctions backfired and europe actually suffers from -for their own policies aimed at harming russia and belarus and i do not understand how the european people can continue to support a policy that harms him, not achieving the desired results in russia, this is a problem of democracy democracy, the whole world, watches hollywood films, follows the life of your stars, eats hamburgers, but this can hardly be called love for america i will try to explain

, i don’t know if this is felt in the usa itself but the main thing that irritates about americans abroad. this is a dictation, something that allows itself in washington, because it does not allow anyone else. time russian point of view or american, i'm talking about the opinion of americans well, from a theoretical point of view, i should be surprised because america is supposed to uphold individual freedoms and we should respect sovereignty, but the reality is that we act differently. this is really good sir. rita i feel i should clarify my question. i ask him no, in order to somehow hurt your patriotic feelings. if you are an american it is logical that you love

your country. understandably, my question is about something else . all this is important, because america still held number one today. and this is not only a right, but also a great responsibility. well i'm sure you agree with this. right, but that's what i'm trying to convey. this is an example let's look at what joe biden says as president. he says our best export is american democracy, but what are we exporting? as you noticed democracy is not defined by hollywood soda or clothing democracy is more intuitive, democracy. this is the principle position of the principles that speak of the empowerment of the individual for the benefit of the collective for everyone on the planet for all the moment that all this

was built for the united states american democracy was built american history unique american history that cannot be replicated anywhere else. so when we talk about american democracy. it is the product of an imperfect history. remember when we signed our constitution we had slavery, when we signed our constitution women didn't have the right to vote. we had to grow as a nation, and we waged war not only against england but also a civil war against ourselves. we have there is a civil rights movement that is against inequality in how we treat people of color here in the united states and we are still dealing with these issues with these historical issues that define who we are and what you and i represent. so our democracy is aimed at solving american problems. how can we take this and insist that you and belarus follow

the american model our model is based on our history, if democracy is really possible in belarus it should follow belarusian model, starting from the history of belarus, the same thing with russia, it can be democracy. it will be a democracy with a belarusian face, reflecting belarusian values ​​and principles, and they will be different from ours, and we must accept that the rest of the world cannot and will not live like a mirror projection of the united states and this is the biden's failure, because we do not we can export democracy democracy must grow from within in every country. we must encourage this growth, but in order to do so, we must respect differences. and this america is not engaged, because, as it were , they correctly noticed. we dictate. we don't lend a helping hand. we don't offer it. we dictate decisions and wants to be dictated to her in the end. i'd like to ask, that's what

it's kind of weird about. here right now. we both communicate easily, discuss complex topics, many of our political countries are definitely not friends, but i will give, what prevents us from hearing each other. you know, i would say that you can hear me well enough, i believe that belarus can be heard well enough, the united states and i don't think it's the problem is connected with belarus, this does not mean that we cannot have disagreements. i may not eat them, and this is quite logical. but you know, the key aspect of disagreement is the ability to communicate and work your way through problems to a solution that is fair for both parties. but for this to happen, it's not only that you hear me, it's just what america does, we say and insist that you

listen, and then we insist that you act on what we say, what we don't do. so we don't take it time out and not listening to what you have to say not hearing what you have to say and not acting on what you have to say communication should be a two way street and right now the united states is out of touch. we dictate and you cannot solve this problem. you know one of the things i've always said is that you can't solve a problem. if you don't first define it exactly, because if you don't know what the problem is, there is no solution directly. now the problem is that you have wisely noticed. it's the lack of communication that's the problem between the united states and belarus. the united states and russia we don't communicate effectively enough, but you see the us doesn't recognize that because we think we communicate effectively, that we tell you what we want from you. well, why don't we

do it. so this doesn't complete the rest of the equation, which is to listen to what you have to say, treat it with respect, and come to a mutually agreeable solution. problems. thank you very much for being with us good luck and we hope to meet again. thank you very much, have a nice day. well, this is how the conversation turned out, as it often happens, everyone saw something of their own in it, but as for me, this is another illustration of those forces for which democracy is only a screen, behind which there is no place, neither humanism nor friendship of peoples project, like victory over poverty or a breakthrough into outer space for this vile, but very influential rude. alien life just a resource or a hindrance from here to kind like a new plague, transgender sodom and artificial intelligence, like a wolf in sheep's clothing. it's not even

an experiment anymore. this is some kind of war started without our century, and both sides have something to lose in it, but if for them it is capital, then for billions of others it is a matter of being. in the most christian sense, it looks like just such a battle is going on now and something suggests that few people succeed in being just a spectator in this global battle. thanks for being happy with us.

good evening live panorama of the studio ekaterina tikhomirova and about the main events this tuesday, what is happening along the perimeter of the borders of the growth of the nato grouping and provocations , the president held a meeting with the power bloc, non-healing wounds, or how they killed odessa