you are opinions and pretexts and remember that politics is very difficult. but it's very interesting. i am categorically glad that we are now forcing ourselves to be respected, you can watch the author's projects of igor tur propaganda on the belarus 24 tv channel every day. we experience millions of emotions. we can be happy, angry , surprised, sad, sometimes our emotions. we are not subject to music expresses our emotions much more strongly. this emotional force literally takes back, and has already hit us. it becomes an integral puzzle of life, because

the secret of music is that it finds an inexhaustible source of expression, where speech stops music instead of a thousand. hello, we are glad to everyone who is now with us in the studio olga lazurkina and oleg gaidukevich. i salute you.

well, later, our conversation with the american military expert scott rieter, as it seems, the problem of peace turned out very frankly from that side, i immediately say that we recommend that from the same side of the atlantic all the main processes directly or indirectly today rest against the ukrainian front, a large-scale doctrine defender, 23 experts unanimously. they say, expect provocations around transnistria, crimea and belarus, and such information appears the other day, the limon newspaper reports france refused to help ukraine with planning combat missions on the territory of belarus kiev requested a digital map of belarus in paris, which would allow ukrainian aircraft to fly over the country at ultra-low altitudes informs the lemon and could plan the route and departures in advance , taking into account the terrain in france , said that they would not participate in operations of ukraine on the territory of other states.

here is alexander sergeevich what do you think about this when you hear such plans hmm ukraine i perfectly understand that this threatens with very serious provocations, which can lead not just as an escalation of the conflict in ukraine, but drawing all of europe into this conflict, why such a reaction was at the macron. it would seem that europe lies under the sovereignty of the united states of america, no, all the decisions that are made in the white house europe salutes and executes, despite the fact that this hits its actually national interests with the whole economic political issue of national security, but on the other hand. even so. even there, despite the lack of sovereignty, there is understanding. what the escalation with belarus can lead to, after all , it will not be possible to draw belarus alone into the war , for example, the president spoke about this more than once in his message. if they are drawn in, belarus is drawn in

, the whole of europe is no longer a special one, the military operation will already be used all the forces and capabilities that the allied europe has states and what it will lead to understands europe, but i see that you do not question what is reported. this is a french newspaper cozy. doesn't mean after that i'm 100% sure of it. moreover, i am convinced that kiev is fulfilling the will of the united states . and what is the will of the united states to prolong the conflict as long as possible ? we see that the most combat-ready units of the armed forces, which have been preparing for many years , are simply it's a matter of time, what's next? how to support this conflict, how to make it play out, we need new foreigners, we need new victims, who they have in the baltics, but this is only rhetoric, they don’t have a human resource, a lot of rhetoric, as

the great three call them on the internet. lithuania latvia estonia causing laughter, which the poles can only bark, there is this time, but on the other hand. i would very much like to draw in the dream, belarus was always directed at this by their policy to destroy our state from the inside out, to make it here at the beginning of the civil war, and then i’ll throw all this at russia, after some time it didn’t work out. so it is necessary to provoke, therefore he claims that kiev has applied for such data not only as france, but to all the west. well, we see that, apparently , france has refused other silence. this suggests that exactly 100% of the baltic countries will relax, poland will give any. we are well aware of the data that ukraine will request, and here there is only one criterion, which is the country that has more sovereignty. she doesn't go for it. france, although it lies under the united states but still it is the founding country of the european union, like germany, it is the main country of the big

big three of the eu. well, here, lithuania, look how interesting it turns out. hmm. that's what the zelensky regime is terrible now and why it is necessary to deal with such information as we started discussing today with maximum tension, and listen, because they have barbaric logic. look what just recently said, the adviser to the head of zelensky's office podolak. he said that ukraine has the right to destroy everything that is located in the crimea and donbass, it seems. wait all the time. shout that this is your land crimea donbass and you want to destroy everything surprisingly barbaric logic, which is being broadcast now, kiev officially. i think this is the logic of war in the first place. we should treat it differently, but still i would doubt that paris single-handedly made such a decision regarding the digital map of belarus. i think it is right that such an informational message was presented with a simulated one. i would

watch everything here, two signals in the first place the fact that preventing the spread of the conflict remains extremely important for the european union at this stage and the position of france - this was demonstrated by the second very important signal of the firmness of the position, uh, and uh, the determination of the response from belarus, finally realized by the european elites. that's why this message is so wide. uh, circulated in the press. i think it's also important who you think. that's what kind of game france is playing right now . we see that macron. here he goes to the biden and says, we are brothers in arms in the war for ukraine , he returns from beijing and says that now in europe there is no need to fight for taiwan at all, we should not follow the american format, then he says this. our task is to help ukraine survive. by all means. do not let russia win, do not allow the expansion

of this conflict. that's what kind of game and that's the most important thing, who is playing this game with my hands. ah, i think that, uh, this situation, this situation, how would it be related to the fact that we are a little from our point of view, we evaluate solidarity if we are talking about solidarity because it could when they have solidarity, yes, and we , uh, see it only in our understanding and more in belarusian, but there are other options there is a belarusian version, indeed, it is built, uh at position e. a union of like-minded people with a very high share of responsibility on a global scale. and there is another well-known for us. e point of view. it’s us already, we’ll just express it with tobacco, apart, and in fact the macron demonstrates it today, but i would pay attention more for one moment, which very much hides paris and macron, and in particular, but paris is today between the fires. these are the sanctions

of the united states of america, these are retaliatory measures from china and russia, and without restraint. the protectionism that is spreading across europe is why all the actions of the macron are aimed at somehow surviving this fight that is unfolding today. they don’t want to introduce it to us in the information space yet, but it exists and this is all the subtleties of the french external politics, we are talking about the survival of europe in general for today, and not just france . and there are a huge number of problems in the european union and, in general, the a priori, the macroru very often assessed the internal audience, which must be shown at least something that he defends national interests. the french, after all , everything that the macro says is actually discussed in europe, and so why are we helping ukraine, why are we supplying weapons? why do we need a war? take care of french problems, sort out, in the end, the mountains of garbage that lie in the city with migrants. no one does nothing about the problem. only grows.

well, there is one more aspect that i would like to mention. we should never again believe a word of what european politicians say, lest they tell us. we don't want escalation, we don't want war, we will never attack. we don't want war with russia not to believe a single word. we must remember one simple thing - they will have the slightest opportunity to attack and destroy. they will know that there will be no answer , they will know that there will be nothing for them, just as there was nothing in yugoslavia for this in libya there was nothing for it in syria in iraq, which means they will attack and destroy in the name of democracy and freedom all the belarusians who die here. they'll say no big deal. this is for the great bright future, so not believing a single word is the only way to prevent war being strong, therefore the president is right, when now is over. for all these years, especially the last year, he pays a huge amount of attention without words to issues of national security and

our military power, and i am not afraid of this word, but in fact, for today, we actually pushed back the war. it was very simple that they pushed aside not by their rhetoric, nor by their promises, not by their words, but by the fact that today our military potential has increased significantly, but after the deployment of tactical nuclear weapons. this step, uh, will push the war back for a long time, we'll discuss it, but that completes the topic of this one. as olga igorievna correctly said, solidarity is what seems to us to be solidarity here in the west, judging by everything. she looks this way the us is outraged public and paris and brussels along with it. bytes are spoken during a telephone conversation. he planted a macron for post-beijing theses, but most clearly this conflict was expressed by the vice-president of the american heritage foundation, kharitovich, fandeisha - this is the most influential factory of american thought james krafan code magazine ntrest published an article where he

actually threatens it is time to reconsider the status of the united states as ukraine's leading donor we must demand others from france. partners of the report who and how helped kiev until the eu reports the us should not send money to ukraine. so this is the environment and the owner. so the whole policy is shifted again and again. here is the notorious counter-through that they cannot agree among themselves how they will divide further and because of this , too, but one more thing must be said, the americans are now destroying the european economy every month . they put her on a gas needle , which means they put her on an american needle on an industrial needle. now many european enterprises are moving to other countries. many they are striving, including in the united states. that is, today they have hooked europe on themselves , that is, they will lose the economic sovereignty of europe, respectively, such statements can be made

to scare europe because, like ukraine , let's not dream up, but think about the further development of the situation. today there is no ukraine. as a state, because it is completely dependent on western aid, will there be or europe after some time? i'm not talking about now, if such a policy continues, what will happen to the european economy in 5 years after 6 years of sanctions after 6 years of complete dependence on america, what will happen to it? i'm afraid that germany, uh, france will not be pulled out on itself. this is the load, don't they understand. this, to be honest, is given back to them on their own. well, look, there is a statement from here. we see that, on the one hand, the united states is directly telling its partners there and in the asian region , in south korea, first of all, reduce the supply of microchips that do not trade with china. and this is 300 billion dollars of turnover between south korea and china, and then same thing they are now talking to the european union and all trade with europe from china is 850

billion dollars, you can understand why they do not want to burn bridges. and why such it would seem large? the gift of the state in economic terms is so powerless, is it true, how is your salon? well, i wouldn’t talk completely about the vassal positions of europe, of course, there is, but the only thing is that they have relaxed since the forty -fifth year and are used to receiving this kind of subsidies and living in such a stable world, but the financial world, but then what do you said relatively. here are the editions of national intels, because this is the formula that trump once put forward. this was the first question after he came to power, to which he asked her in europe how long we will support you, then it’s time to invest in your security. and today it is already a question. e of ukraine a does europe understand this, of course, sensible european analysts from the very beginning of the conflict in ukraine say that

europe should go on its own track, and what the macron said, this is not just his words. but macron is forced to protect not only the interests of those he represents, but he is also the president of france, so he is limited, but it seems to me that there is an even more important undercurrent today, besides this fuss that we are seeing between the us and europe, after all, the globalization that we have seen economic and interconnectedness and the transformation that it has caused in the economy in the political landscape, it has two sides. uh, what we see for the golden billion is enrichment and the second very important aspect. after all, a club of elite powers and those schemes that used to enrich the influence that were hidden. they became available to a large number of states, and if earlier, and the countries of asia in the middle east watched the behavior of their partners.