time span 3 4 5 years happens it is necessary that from an idea to implementation, and the ribbon was cut, the object was opened. he managed to remember, here, uh, the main ideas of uh, the project and uh to bring it. this is an architect to the end - this is hmm to some extent a psychologist who constantly evaluates what is happening and finds those appropriate motives that allow the project to pass. uh, from the stage, there is a specialist architect - this is such a creative person, remaining this personality but is constantly in negotiations in uh, meetings in convictions. e circle of people and finds opportunities. e, so that the proposed concept of the idea is perceived or accepted. to whom it is offered to the client

for approval in the city and here is the ability and constant updating of these motives, because from time to time it seems that well, this has already been heard, but you need to find ways to explain in a new way. here is the need for this or that concept of the idea, architects - this is a combination of creativity and a very organized creative continuation and completion of this e set of qualities. uh, very necessary for the successful completion of the object some of them, uh, might weaken uh, completion of the project and uh, the object won't look the way it was originally intended. i think that the most interesting architectural buildings in minsk can be called the development of historical cities. it so

happens that it is massive. it is an ensemble, of course, uh, the city of minsk, and not without exception , one can name each historical center of our regional cities, there are a lot of small towns that adequately attract both guests and local residents in minsk, the most interesting ones are independence avenue kirov street karl marx street public gardens aleksandrovsky mikhailovsky development along the armored lane. here are some ideal examples. e cases where building. it is multifaceted and being in it, well, it gives such satisfaction, and you can stay there for a long time.

it is difficult to talk about plagiarism in architecture, especially today, when such a variety surrounds us, perhaps in music and other art forms. it takes place in architecture in our practice. it is hardly possible to teach someone plagiarism or, uh, say, that these are similar, it seems that today there is no border. and literally pinterest can offer tens of hundreds. eh, variants of similar facades e details, and architectural techniques are objective even today, and everything happens without plagiarism. lots of ideas. they

are repeated and copied from country to country. and with cases, the case, therefore, you need to design , you need to create, you need not to limit yourself to any such restrictions, and new interesting directions will appear for architectural techniques. i think people are in demand. or maybe u call yourself happy a person’s demand for his home at work in the circle of friends, e, makes him happy , of course, complete happiness, it’s hardly possible to talk about this, because we are still young, and everything is ahead of us, so we are on the path to happiness.

hello, i welcome everyone who is now with us with the guests in the studio, today we are talking about the confrontation on the battlefield, military and political, in the second part we will talk about a big spiritual war. a conversation with a real expert in this area, archpriest andrey tkachev. so get settled let's get comfortable, well, let's start here, the news seems to have died down, but the sediment remained , so let's figure it out on may 9, like thunder from a clear sky, the words of the head of the kgb ivan tertel sounded an attempt to commit terrorist attacks in belarus on the eve of may 9, we know what is behind this special services. after all, the attack on the machulishcha airfield in the terrorist attack on the crimean bridge is still so fresh in my memory, the assassination of daria dugin and vladlen by the tatars, the assassination attempt on the russian writer zakhar prilepin, who survived only by a miracle, fortunately, belarusian special services, worked clearly this time , they managed to avoid the tragedy and traces again.

the detainees lead to ukrainian customers leave no doubt, how can one not recall the words of the head of that very main intelligence department of the ministry of defense of ukraine kirill budanov, we killed russians and will kill russians anywhere in the world until the complete victory of ukraine, only now we see that among the targets of such like volcanoes not only russians. here is oleg sergeevich, and again and again the traces lead and we hear the sbu gur, and bank office. do you really have to agree with those who believe that, well, ukraine still faces the goal of drawing belarus into the hot phase of the conflict, not ukraine the west for the west who wants to unleash a war on the entire european continent e and fuel. we must constantly throw up and one more thing must be taken into account that millions of dollars today go to war with russia and a hybrid war against belarus, the result of military results will not be dug up. look north south - they are not

interested. they are not interested in winning. this means that they are well aware that they will not win by military means. russia is never belarus, but what is the goal? we in this studio talked a lot about the destruction of the european union, the weakening of europe, therefore hybrid warriors around russia are good for them and new fuel new points of conflict for them is an excellent goal and such a task is facing the kiev regime, which is now essentially a terrorist , because when here are the words of this budanov from terror. this suggests that it is a terrorist mode, which puts its own. the purpose of the terrorist attacks on the territory of the whole world, they don’t hide it, we will carry out a terrorist attack. and the goal is one goal. uh, this is not peaceful for ukraine, this is not a victory. ukraine, no one believes in it to anyone. she doesn’t need this ukraine for a long time already, as a state and a people who would live happy well, the goal is this one point of the war, and around it some provocations would be seething to belarus so that poland would start

to pull up the baltic states somehow to pull up and so that dozens were boiling, and at this time there was a default it will be possible to avoid in the usa and at this time it will be possible to fight geopolitically with china calmly, for now, everything is boiling there, and everyone is busy with these problems, and there it will turn out to blow up the middle east, but then they began to lose something, the americans are now losing the middle east africa and where the war began, it is necessary to fight from africa in this way, all this is done with one goal. and to keep the hegemony of the united states of america or not, unfortunately, how many people will die and one more moment and finish we must understand that the risks of a terrorist attack. how much did the president and they will not leave this extremism anywhere, not in a month, not in two, not in a year, not in two. this will now be the main weapon against belarus for two reasons. the first reason is the understanding of the impossibility of a military path, especially after the adoption of the head of the head of state. the solution is the placement of tactical nuclear weapons and fortifications.

in principle, the borders are already from 400, they are all service and other complexes, and the second reason is the election campaign of 24 years in belarus russia 25 years, belarus can no longer influence these companies from outside the west due to of our legislative acts, which the parliament has adopted over these two years, the strength of the work of civil society is not the strength of popularity. e radicals on the territory of belarus to 0%, what remains to be done with them requires the result of one kill at least someone blow up at least someone show that they receive millions. dollars not in vain, but andrey petrovich and what conclusions do we draw from all this? well , first of all, what conclusions can be drawn, first of all, well, it’s probably not entirely correct today to use such a concept as ukraine is a terrorist state. why? well firstly, to yes, yes, yes, well, i say that it is generally used in general already now in everyday life and here, probably still talking about what to be likened to, first of all, such a state as a dwarf, yes or meters and so

on , which define such a thing as state terrorism, although this does not exist in international practice. most likely, it is probably correct to say that there are unfriendly or hostile states. here is ukraine for us, truly today is hostile state. and this did not happen during the start of a special military operation on february 24th. and long before that. let 's remember who was the very first to impose sanctions himself, who really carried out sabotage by sending sabotage groups to us. who sponsored who created the conditions for carrying out various terrorist acts, including? remember these provocations, including those in belarusian. we had, uh, all these events. they say that ukraine has long been targeting our state and she aimed far more than one. they are correct. here it was said to manage all this , indeed a collective smell, and above all, of course, this is an interest in poland, the creation of a single state from the sea

to the sea, what does this require of us? here, first of all. we need to be aware of what is really going on. what's happened? and what is a hostile state? now, in fact, we are at the final stage of developing the concept of national security. the task has already been set for the state secretaries of the council security development of military doctrine. first of all. i think that the prerequisites have already been created and it can be assumed that such concepts as unfriendly hostile states may appear in military doctrine and what dangers from them to us military states about possible alliances and states such an option is possible, we can assume. on the other hand , a clear plan has been formed today. yes, there is an intention. there is a clear plan on how to influence the republic of belarus on the union state as a whole against the background of this plan. how e to influence us in different

areas in the same political area look now we are trying to isolate almost all international clubs. it turns out, this is a different question, and against the background of all this, international extremism is also fueled further, if we look, in the economic sphere, it has already reached the point of open robbery and destruction. yes, they blow up the streams and destroy, because you are derailing our e, locomotives, together with trains, are squeezing out the sales markets that we have in the information sphere. all this warms up, moreover, both in the internal spectrum and in the external in the external spectra , preparing, it is the information heating of that, well, what did they rush in belarus, is this normal? this is exactly what they say is a terrorist state. they support russia, they are bad and so on. and on may 9, a vivid example of this, if you blew up the tank, you said you blew yourself up. this is the belarusian special services prepared. if it didn't happen, they said again. this is a provocation

that they prepared. this is a very interesting idea. look we are in parallel. here i agree completely with the words. e, oleg the point is that the critically low popularity of the opposition in the belarusian society is here, which is located, but at the same time it is necessary to understand that there are still many who sympathize. this is the first thing to remember. and secondly, you probably need to understand that such figures as, for example, tikhonovskaya they are probably no longer designed for our audience, but it’s not in vain that they contain her for that audience. the west is not in vain that they carry it around europe, they need to pump up its legitimacy, because favorite and their tool is provocation and periodically. ah, the ukrainian regime. not only implements these provocations, but also makes stuffing that explains. and why do they need all this? here is a literally fresh example of an acting brigade commander. azov, a certain karasievich, shared his thoughts on this matter. i will quote his words verbatim. if you want to destroy the enemy. destroy his allies first. we have a very

beautiful country like belarus if the legitimate president is tikhonovskaya says this one krayevich, and she can simply issue orders to help her liberate her country. she just gives orders and that's it. these are the thoughts of these people, it was no longer a secret that they were ready, which means , on command, to hand over a decree and ask for help from poland for e, seizing power and more polish troops. remember president petra planned to seize the soil. that is, if there was an unfavorable scenario for the security forces, we were weak nonsense, well, they would start the western regions, and she would say, i am the legitimate president, i appeal to the western civilizational world. save us from russian occupation. let's fix it, that is, tikhonov's, and there is no need to be some kind of weighty figure. she can remain this cardboard politician, she is used for her intended purpose, as it should be, igor thinks in the right direction, when we analyze such things, it’s only right, uh, after all, the events of 2020 showed that

after all, supporters of the president of belarus , the peaceful development of the country. they are monolithic, respectively, from the plan to create the illusion that tikhonovskaya is something in order to issue an order. eh, they refused to invite this strategy to their troops. why what should we do now in a situation where we have a sharply increased situation with the danger of terrorist attacks at night, and hmm alexander grigoryevich very often says that in the current situation we need to do the simplest thing. it's easy to work each in his own area. it's not just some kind of populist words and statements that logic will calm everyone down. after all, in the next who commits terrorist attacks, who can cooperate with foreign intelligence services, these are marginal people who have no work, conditionally, no family , everything is bad in life. they are unhappy. uh, they tried something, nothing happened, despair

appears against this background, when some other forces come to them, such as the ukrainian intelligence is offering. come on, help us. commit terrorist attacks the country will change your life will be. better, of course, this will not happen, but such people will be ready to perform some, uh, catastrophe. and the better we all work in the current situation, the less. uh, we will have consequences for our economy, respectively, there will be fewer such marginalized dissatisfied personalities . let’s all stop thinking about the war now , don’t read what’s happening in messengers, and everyone in their own area should work on this strategic plan for civilians, how to help protect us all and ourselves from terrorist attacks. yes , you know, i'm here we are talking marginalized . yes, i also looked today. this film is a fighting package, because there are such. well, let's say, the guys have quite active

tactile positions, one girl, she actually filled the headman at bsu there, that is, it was. the fact that it is clear that she somehow actively manifests herself is definitely not marginal. you know, today everyone really needs to work in their place, and today we are parliamentarians, they have built clear legislative barriers in order to prevent such a negative phenomenon as terrorism. yes, there may be hard barriers. uh, today there is a death penalty for attempted terrorism. we thus warn that even an attempt on terrorism can end for any person. here. and here, pay attention to such an interesting moment, yes, here earlier in the field of a terrorist of such a beard, this is an uncle. yes, with a kalashnikov at the ready, the girl give no. now, in fact, about hmm, the image of a terrorist has changed a very long time ago and for 10-15 years, or even more, we are talking about the fact that the average terrorist is not

conditional. there is a forty-year-old wahhabi with a beard. this is a young man, 225 years old, give or take rather active position, but it is possible that his activity leads to some results for me. and as for the different information there from different special services of the world, all special services pay attention to such people in the first place. here i agree, why 25 years 30 years? why young man? how does it start with who from politics? do you think in the beginning comes to our country, which says that it is fighting? hundreds of thousands of dollars are invested for democracy, then on the website of foreign embassies that are in our country they post information and go to an unsanctioned rally further, this is an ngo that brainwashes a young man for 16 years, says throwing stones at the police, you can destroy the city , you can start from this, and then he is led to terrorism. whoever committed a terrorist attack in a st. petersburg cafe, a girl who for ten years was in opposition

at the beginning of navalny's radical foundation means white ribbons. everything from this was not brainwashed there and there are no brains not to be in opposition to someone. yes, we ourselves sent her prepared for terror. that is, what conclusion do i want to draw we must understand that in our country there will never be an external factor in politics, we must not allow any ufos, no backgrounds. here the war will end, that you did not happen to him, not a single one connected with politics in the country should not be, if we assume. in 10 years, we will grow everything anew. it will be that most of what we now call political ngos came up as city projects design studios. now we must understand money just like that, if ukraine was given millions of dollars for the sole purpose of starting a war, if money will go to belarus, it's not for us, it's

for them. and here's what we should be looking at right away. why are they giving money? does anyone really believe what they are experiencing? they want 110 birds for us, they didn't want to deal with insects. they don't need it. look at the girl who, uh, pawned the parcel. on the one hand, how would you look at these young people and probably on this account. i'm sure that many people have an inner instinct like that. parent here to find them some excuse. maybe they didn't know may have been manipulated, she's listenin to their confessions. do you understand that when she was driving? and she knew that they brought explosives to bury in the cemetery, then you are not dealing with naive guys, although they are trying to close each other, no, and i won’t give you, but someone believes that the state is given millions of dollars to help him, this is a fairy tale this is such a psychological trick, but how, like a train moving along rails, you need to switch the arrow so that the least number of people die, but this needs to be

decided by such young people they have the illusion that, well, i didn’t take this package, didn’t take it somewhere, didn’t set off the explosion. i just took it and put it in the right place. i'm not a terrorist, they say. so these people say that i was asked to do this by asking a question. do you want to have friendship between belarus and ukraine illegally do not release, so that between our strange democracy, yes, for freedom. two people for the world. and what is behind this, not only our special services have to keep abreast, but also the people of the army on monday president alexander lukashenko worked at the central command post of the air force and air defense forces , the main tasks of combat duty are the protection of the state border. in the airspace, the repulse of an attack on the republic of belarus, the elimination of the threat or the suppression of acts of terrorism in the

airspace, the suppression of violations of the rules for the use of airspace. well, it’s clear that, in general, the production is not easy, to put it mildly, we talk about this every program, but, nevertheless, andrey petrovichko, what about the military? how do you characterize environment. well, now, as they say, the situation is complicated, but controlled. and in more detail, well, everything is happening, of course, against the backdrop of the general militarization of europe, this is the main one in particular. yes, of course, that is, there is more military than what is happening in ukraine well, look, i can give simple examples . what is happening today in the west, firstly, there is a complete re-equipment at all nato bases of the order of eight, that is, there in italy in belgium in the netherlands in turkey in italy tactical nuclear munitions

full modernization before the end of this year, against the background of this, tactical exercises are taking place, tactical flight exercises are being used , well, with the conditional use of tactical nuclear weapons, the global storm of 2023 for the moment is only along our state border, in addition to those exercises that we hear about in the defenders defender and about nine exercises are being conducted at the same time, the anaconda aurora group is involved in a really huge 2,5 about two and a half thousand combat aircraft is now in the european european part of the continent of our eurasian only in our direction there are about 140 such combat aircraft. you know, i’ll interrupt, we talk about this many times, and i met people who, as they think, they are ordinary people , speak with a counter argument. well, wait, everyone is doing exercises. well, now they will learn and leave. we are specifically increasing propaganda, as it were, threats in the form of teachings. how terrible are these teachings. what is the real threat from these exercises, they are carried out against someone, they are not carried out for some purpose,

just to figuratively say to shoot somewhere. yes, that is, coordination is carried out at the final stage of coordination, everyone completes the task, everything. the term conditional enemy always means, someone specific, unconditionally, that is, what weapons systems, what subdivisions do they have? what is it now , in order to pull the poles during the exercise, are forcing, yes, that is, this is clearly our direction against whom today , by and large, are imprisoned in troops in poland on the one hand. we know this, the kaliningrad region is different - this, of course, is the belarusian direction, as they are today call? our task is to close the brest gates once and for all. until now, we can say that the issue related to the uaz corridor has not been finally resolved. and what can happen against this background, when they once again create a provocation from the kaliningrad region, how russia will be forced to decide nobody knows the situation is also complicated by the

fact that all this is happening and against the backdrop of these events that are taking place in the south of our country. we are talking about the same, the operational strategic command north is 12.3.000 approximately 18.000 is located along our state border and every day. there are provocations against our border guards against our units that have come out to guard the state border. there are daily provocations. and this suggests that at any moment, you might think nato is watching something , and for example, the leadership of poland does not know that belarus is not a threat to anyone. yes , i know perfectly well that they have intelligence and a policy that has been carried out for 30 years. everyone knows that the belarusian does not threaten anyone, that we have never claimed. there is no more lithuania on earth. we have always wanted to live at home and now we wanted to. so why then is there an accumulation of armored vehicles. this means that weapons of an offensive nature and the strength of the means are clearly not for the protection of one crime. they know very well that we will not attack them, the second question was 5 years ago 6

years ago, when ukraine was pumped up with weapons. many said that nothing would happen. it's just for the defense of ukraine , no one will attack anywhere. although. then experts said ukraine does not need so much weapons. nato does not need so many troops, and then it turned out that everyone was well aware that they were preparing for an attack on the russian federation, everyone confirmed more than once that if a special military operation had not begun, an attack on russia would be in a few months. so today, when the president says that you can’t relax , this is precisely the only way to avoid war, seeing this militarization of our neighbors, pumping weapons with offensive weapons, becoming even stronger than the other way. no, because to believe them in fairy tales. well, they always say that they will not attack iraq , they said we will not attack yugoslavia, they said we will not attack russia, they say we will not attack all my life for sweat, lies all my life. they say, we will not attack, then their representatives come out and say, you know, we

are doing this for the sake of democracy, and it will be the same here. they will tell us for years, nothing will happen and wait for any of our weaknesses and mistakes of any weakness. what are they all waiting for now? what will happen after putin lukashenko in 20-30 years, therefore, here are false these insinuations about the health of state leaders. these false insulins are about their condition. this is their dream of terror. it means that something happened and waiting for the moment to strike. we must remember this , we will never be able to relax if we turn in more detail to the ukrainian front, which today directly or indirectly affects all global political processes. here are long-range cruise missiles, in the direction of shedels, at the disposal of the apu idle. of course, they do not lie strikes on luhansk on civilian targets. i will announce a little earlier the transfer of missiles, the head of the british ministry of defense, fired, specified the missiles would allow ukraine to push back the russian troops , kiev, i remember, even guaranteed that it would not use these missiles on the territory in

the depths of russia well, of course, no one believes after the events, for example, two of the bryansk region. there are more details to come, of course. uh, determine if to return. andrey petrovich , we should be worried about these long-range missiles, of course, alexey sergeevich has just told everything. yes, by and large, what are they waiting for us already even tired of lying, they are in all their legal acts, especially hmm on the combat use of troops. it has long been brought that belarus, russia, for them are essentially enemies. these missiles are quite modern , they are produced in britain and in france , the range of their destruction. they say from 300 to 500 km. depending on what version they have prepared, this is actually a very serious weapon. firstly, they are made using modern technology , composite materials are used and they are very difficult to detect. and most importantly, here we are recently they said there maps that, allegedly, france did not provide ukraine for them to

be used because they are joint, as i say, british ukrainian missiles. it means that these maps were provided, that the peculiarity of this rocket is that it flies absolutely autonomously, that is, it does not need adjustment using gps navigation. she controls her own flight. it is clearly displayed under the digital map of the area, so the electronic warfare system becomes virtually useless for counteracting precisely these missiles. here the importance of when the head of state actually met with our security forces. this visit to the central control center of the air force of the air force this indicates that the head of state really clearly understands, indeed, the threat that today arises specifically for our state. this is the bryansk region. this is the emergence of new cruise missiles capable of reaching virtually the entire territory of our republic, belarus. here we are talking about the fact that our air defense forces and means are really ready even in peacetime today to ensure the security of our

states. why do you all remember in 2012 this landing with bears and so on, if it weren’t there, it would probably still happen this landing, because we really created and modernized our air defense systems so much that they are capable of today. oppose absolutely any existing and even promising systems that can affect our state. we have created an adaptive air defense system, we do not need to constantly change something. something has appeared new missiles. we started everything let's clean it all up, create everything new , some new drones have arrived. let's get through all this. we have everything for this . we also have systems such as dew, which can detect aircraft at a height of 5-10 m. we have systems that are the same, vostok, which allows you to detect all all

aircraft that are made according to the stealth system, we see at a depth already there for berlin for 500 km. what happens to the airspace and ready to shoot down at midget altitudes, as he said, from 10 m to the nearest space, and that's it. today, this was created thanks to the modern approach that was used to create precisely the anti-aircraft and anti-radar system. and defense, to say the least, yes to strike, so that our viewers know, because we do not want to. and besides, there is not a single point of safety where we will not strike. why is europe behaving like this , they are actually embroiled in a war with russia. and everyone says, we are not involved, we are not involved for one simple reason, the fear of hitting points in the european poland airfield in france such conditions in such conditions. uh, peace talks. they are still relevant absolutely always this process will be relevant for one simple reason , any war ends with negotiations about this president.

he spoke on the spot with the question with whom and at what cost and how many people should die on and that’s the whole trouble of the current situation more than once, we said, well, not independent, the kiev regime would be independent and thought, at least for one millimeter, but how many bakhmati people ukrainians are dying today. how many mobilized one figure can be believed or not believed, reduce it by half , nothing changes for 500-600 people. she is dying in bakhmut today mobilized ukrainians, if you think the president of ukraine, at least a little bit about the people, how much did you put in the graves? and you say there will be no negotiations. it's not you talking, it's the us talking. we have not yet earned enough money, we still want to earn a testing ground for weapons of subjectivity. there is no trump when he says that if he were president in 24 hours, he would leave war is not so and so on. some other polygon is needed. here with the same ones. well, unfortunately, we live in such a time that political observers need to study some military issues in 2011, and

britain and france got together and decided that they would modernize weapons and, er, design a new missile to replace the storm shadow after that, britain left from the european union then the coronavirus. it all dragged on into february. 2022, the british and french are getting together again and are rolling out their already updated program missiles, which to replace the storm shadow, uh , the name to my perseus, if my memory serves me right, in order for a new missile to replace the old one. uh, it means that you need to test the old one somewhere in combat conditions to make it better. after some time , towards the side, shadow ends up in ukraine so that it doesn’t matter from ukraine, in general, where in fact for suppliers, there are weapons developers. she fired somewhere , conclusions about the effectiveness will be drawn and used to develop a new missile, so ukraine unfortunately, for us, even e lost

the subjectivity of the state, as far as peace processes are concerned. let's see the process, it's really interesting. here, the chinese foreign ministry said that from may 15, a special address to beijing dashing will visit ukraine poland, france, germany and russia to discuss the settlement of the ukrainian dwarf, moreover, the number of countries that are ready to contribute to the restoration of peace is growing ria novosti reports dent south africa said that on behalf of the country of africa has already spoken with putin and zelensky they agreed to accept the mission of african leaders on the peace initiative of the brazilian president. yes, the force intends on the sidelines of the g-7 summit in hiroshima to offer its mediation in resolving the crisis. he emphasized that the time has come for diplomacy, not war; moreover, his assistant for international affairs has already visited kiev and met zelensky diplomat noted both sides. they will have to come to an understanding that the price of the war will be higher than the price of individual ledges. marina aleksandrovna, how do

you like such a message? the price of war will be higher than the price of individual services. how do you well, you know in general, i think that it is very right that we are moving towards peaceful negotiations and there are many leaders of countries who want to make their contribution. here is a good thing. here you know how a drop wears away a stone. that's right oleg sergeevich says. in any case, any conflicts end with negotiations. indeed, you know, the cost of war is very high, very high. first of all, this is the well-being of people, the life of people, this is the future of countries, the future of the planet. therefore, in any case, it is necessary, of course, to achieve by any means of the world will the political elites of ukraine hear them in my opinion. today, hardly hardly, but i have

hope that the people of ukraine are still ukrainian. someday he will get tired of the war as much as possible and create such conditions for his political elites when, in principle, peace negotiations will be inevitable, when this moment comes for ukrainians who remain adequate, who will take power into their hands with weapons in their hands, stopping externally controlled aggression . uh, other military personnel just say that today on the politically elite ukraine well, i would not count. yes, perhaps, the people of ukraine, perhaps the military. yes , but i think it will be that here this moment of the limit the boiling point will come concessions. well , maybe you should.