big daria tarasova and roman filiutech from the big tour olga medved and dmitry garkusha tel news agency, yoshkar-ola, russia this is the informational picture of thursday , may 25 on the evening air today, a special report on exposed corruption schemes . why do belarusian tomatoes and cucumbers often cost more than imported ones, who wants to make money illegally in this profitable business, and how the power block works in these conditions in the context of the president’s demands, we will talk about exposed corruption schemes starts, but the prices of vegetables. for some reason the prices are not going down. today , they are outrageous hitting the ceiling to raise prices anywhere else. it is impossible for belarusian tomatoes and cucumbers to be imported at the price of imported subtleties of the price policy of rogue merchants, they understood that there were losses, of course, they tried to invest all these costs in the cost

of production bribes corruption lobbying the three whales that drag the belarusian agrarian sector to the bottom were handed over to the heads of belarusian agricultural producers . uh, cash as bribes for a total amount equivalent to 450,000 belarusian rubles, gratitude in an envelope to all partners. and at whose expense the banquet dancing all consumers pay. tomorrow. i have to fly out at 12:00, maybe i need to transfer the money to me, so that people can distribute it and the role of the head of state in the policy of curbing food prices will significantly slow down inflationary processes in the country, a special report by the agency. until the news about those who drive up the prices of vegetables and their illegal ways of doing business, calculating greens, watch thursday night. and right

now, from an actual interview with another, repentant for the literary, grandfather on the other side of the protest. i'm sorry. all the best, happy. the taste of tea is different now, as if different, like those moments that happen in life. they change the feeling of the whole feeling. the breeze is the feeling of the fresh air of the flowers of the trees. and in principle, you begin to appreciate life in all its manifestations and little things. never

worked with wood before. i work . your punishment, well, actually not related to deprivation of liberty, but during this time it was possible to rethink something. what happened, that you agreed to the interview, attention and

awareness of individual moments and what was happening, it came. well, i think that at once everything that has happened in my life over the past year is quite natural things, a clear understanding that literally one wrong step is one of the edge and that's it, the conversation in the twentieth year, in fact, it was going on, not so much, but acting authorities or about certain individuals. how much about what to change everything, and moreover, those people who are active about it spoke out. they weren't ready to take responsibility. the scarecrow was the realization that one of these people would be tomorrow. maybe something, well, you iron, for example, awareness that the country is within its borders with its state symbols. on the whole

, rather staple things can happen to our society, up to the complete disappearance, in my opinion, any changes. they should come in the form of, uh, peaceful transformation, first and foremost. they must go through dialogue through the search for peaceful solutions. well you consider yourself patriot. yes, do you consider those who left to be patriots difficult to talk about patriotism and difficult to talk about love for the motherland when you call for sanctions to be imposed against your side that kill the economy and that make it worse not somehow. a conditional and ephemeral ruler or the first persons, who in fact are beaten by ordinary

citizens. are there people who would very much like to return, who realize that their place is here, that their roots are here, that this is their homeland? i think that all those who are ready to accept and realize. er, many things. well, for for those who have already done this, the way back to belarus is open. well, you still had a lot of time to leave the country too. why did they stay? i do not see myself as someone outside of belarus for those 20 years of my life. our republic gave me a lot of opportunities for development for self-development could have been avoided there. and why yes, yes, i am sitting, and in fact, at the moment many people who have already realized these things are serving their sentences, real

patriots. they remained in the country, true patriots. they continue the important work of preservation of sovereignty for the development of various areas of various industries or who left? they can still return to our society and become part of our extended family. the main thing is for yourself. uh, acceptance and understand that you are not afraid of the responsibility of society and the state. it is after this time. well done give a chance to everyone, many of those who left, especially those who are very active now in the information field. they went through this. here is some point impossible, there is a feeling. then i think these people they live perfectly other values. unfortunately, it’s real in the future of our country, how much belarus will develop from the events in

it depends on this, how strongly they can exist and stay in the information field , there is sometimes a feeling that for individual people for individual resources. the worse, the better the answer is, of course, the obvious answer was obvious back in the twentieth year, that no one is interested in a strong strong belarus in a strong state, but about the information fields, what do you think? mm, many continue to live in the world of the fake telegram channel is difficult live. e, relatively speaking, abroad and someone else thinks, but about belarus and other states about the situation. three countries, and not being here, that is, it’s about brainwashing, rather it’s about a lack of understanding of certain

moments and situations now. many people think, well, who is outside of belarus, that almost all of us are already there in a state of some kind of war, not today. tomorrow everyone will go to the front. well, as we see everything is calm and peaceful. who do you think is among those who left, and of those who are now raising their voices from there, who is the most liar? i think that everyone they are quite deceitful people, to be honest, well, if you look at their statements in their interviews, but still. i think it's definitely mm. leader or leader, ah, so called position, this is svetlana tikhanovskaya it's hard for me to imagine. why do they do those things that, uh, harm belarus

and belarusians about funds. well, they exist, they are doing some kind of activity. i think they are clean in front of their sponsors. how clean they are in front of amy people, who remained here still bear the punishment of these organizations and of people. well, not only funds suffered a sufficient number of people. eh, and the people who suffered were those who did not fully realize. and all those who left, they seem to me, do not realize, and what risks and what hmm sacrifices they lead people and, frankly, it's, well, it's inhumane. it seems to me, personally , you have some kind of soul in your soul. here is the insult of the sediment, that they still left and left,

or what? so it turns out that there is definitely a sediment, because, and the amount of negativity that they did for society and for the state and what they continue to do hmm it sure can't go without some without some judgment. yes, without some kind of assessment, an assessment already exists, and the punishment, if not some kind of legal one, then they will suffer a moral one, well, or they already are. and what could they do to make you forgive them? it would be worth starting a constructive dialogue

, uh, with representatives of the current government in belarus, representatives, and foreign states of foreign depressions. dialogue and to what extent. and do they need it ? do people who didn't want to have a dialogue need it? this is, in fact, nothing to change. i think this is a rhetorical question. you know what it looks like. so, these are exclusively slogans with the aim of earning, and some dividends, and some pluses in front of their sponsors curators. unfortunately, many people believed in this, and for this they are now and are being punished, you can’t call those people who have exchanged their homeland a patriot, i will leave and i will again

be free citizens of our society and state and refugees of people with incomprehensible passports, it seems to me that this is stupid and a little unknowing. what do you think, what will he say, here is your namesake, whom the media called your relatives a second cousin, is there someone else, right? well, nevertheless, as it is in the information field. it has already laid down what he will say when the person hears your interview. uh, here is in places of deprivation of liberty. mom anarchy is not about you. no. i'm more of a republican. i put in this sense the concept of what the state can do for

you. and what can you do either the state for the state for the society for development of, uh, certain institutions, that is, and before that, participation in rallies. and what was that mistake? how do you evaluate it now for yourself know? it was a mistake not worth taking part in, in principle, you are anyway. become a participant in destructive events. well, at that moment it turned out that they were, but rather an insignificant thing, but there was awareness and understanding that everything is possible. uh, well, it's extremely bad to turn around. there are people who continue to live in this world of telegram channels. here, what do you think today they can be cut off. vit people not so much continue to live in the world of telegram channels. and how many in the world of their own illusions? yes , it is difficult and scary to admit your mistake and admit that they were right about something or

did something wrong, deep in your soul. they understand it. you were an activist, yes, youngsters, like, you probably promoted some of your ideas. today there is and constructively. that's what you could do useful for society for quite a long time. well including myself being a member of the the active youth wing advocated for better changes, especially in the field. ah. preservation of historical heritage. in the field of cultural development. just what you wanted to change them in recent years is done. especially strenuously, if we talk, for example, about the youth organization and the youth initiative, then over the past 2-3 years it has been done.