mosta symbol in this land, when the great patriotic war began under heavy bombing, we managed to pack. on

my direct instructions, the revival of one of the main cultural symbols of belarus , the famous slutsk belts. the program for the revival of the traditions and technology of the slutsk belts has not been completed. she gave the necessary impetus. the revival of our traditions of our history has been and will be. hello

good day everyone. well, perhaps let's start with the news, which has become such a point in a very long time. we're a high-profile process, like looks like a person in the first minute after pardon, when they threatened as much as 8 years in prison. here on monday was the opportunity to see. this is roman partasevich's emotions on his face say a lot, but we will also listen to literally just the relevant documents that this is simply great news, and i now have a lot of different emotions, and i, of course, am very happy. uh, a lot of emotions. you know, now it's even hard to formulate any specific thoughts. uh, but of course, probably, first of all, i am extremely grateful to the country and, of course, personally president for e. such a decision. i hope

that it will only get better in the future , great news, roman protosevich says, one can understand, from his point of view, this is really great news, an alternative to 8 years in a colony. and what do you think about this, you probably need to understand that protosevich was not threatened with the death penalty, despite the deed that was actually carried out by the fight against the state, as an institution, was carried out within the framework of those extremist actions that we saw. on the other hand, the state has shown his goodness his nobility mercy towards, uh, mr. protosevich and now the ball is on his side who he will be in this society. what moral and ethical choice will he make, will he live as if nothing had happened,

or will he still think through his active position, and demonstrate his readiness to at least compensate for moral damage. here the belarusian society, the belarusian people , the belarusian people, that they are going to leave for belarus, wants to be useful in the country, but it was not in vain that he said this, because his former friends. or rather, even their customers see in the process of things. here is such an enemy, which even i think they are not averse to liquidating and making his sacred sacrifices. why because ? protosevich - this is an example of the fact that you can repent, you can come and you can re-socialize into society. uh, the fugitives are being held in the west today, as we saw 30 belarusians as hostages, whom the fugitives , even the polish leadership, were not afraid to accuse of pro-russian, uh, about russian

espionage. uh, and they are in such hostages of varying degrees in the west, they are holding most of the fugitive protoseviches - this is the way out of this western hostage. and this very strong callous putin rubs a callus on the west, which prevents them from keeping those fugitives in such a concentration camp of the system. therefore , i think that the security of protesevich protesevich. this is well understood, a very important task for the state. for him , the situation remained unenviable. now it's okay. he was released, but before that, he never became his own among strangers and definitely, a stranger among his yesterday's strangers, a stranger among his own yes, as this will have to be sorted out. here in these position he'll be lining up his own, uh, let's say for a long time. but what i would like to add here is that the commission

now has eighty applications for the return of the swede prosecutor general. and this is the event that the president held, let's say pardoned the protosevich, it will give. i was thinking a very big let's say evolutionary step forward. and i think these statements will increase much more in this vein , it is necessary to understand what is happening and the events that the state is holding precisely return the whites. to corrupt the fugitives and show them that you can choose and another way of life yesterday i read somewhere in the comments. here is such a fairly large broad discussion unfolded. here people tried to predict. but what would have happened if it had not happened, the same rice. the same landing, wherever and what was now roman protosevich. here, uh, here, if you think about this topic, what are you leaning towards? i think he would

have stayed on the other side. hmm, in order to go through this evolutionary path, as he said to realize to understand, it had to be here stay sit like that, but on the other side he wouldn't do it. i am completely sure of this, that you think the situation is quite, but normal and the person involved in the criminal case. went to work. repentant cooperation with the investigation, i emphasize once again that the belarusian state has never been repressive, we have no goal, to carry out any repressive actions for the purpose of intimidation, or to prevent the participation of citizens in political activities. our task is to ensure security in the country. and the civilized course of any political processes and, accordingly, in this case, we demonstrate the humanity of the belarusian state and the opportunity for

persons who are involved in destructive political activities to repent to apply for pardon, either to the relevant commission, or to the head of state after the verdict. and i am sure that in those cases when it is really active repentance, such a decision will be made, but in general we must understand that today this period of e history is very responsible for us. we need to pass it with dignity to preserve peace and security in our land. and therefore , citizens who today may pose a threat to the belarusian state should change their minds, since the responsibility will be the most severe. or maybe you can ask with this story how to serve as a lesson. in general, either this is a special case, which you will tell yourself and promote the story. firstly, you understand them when they begin to say that we landed the plane because there was a threat of rumble, no one from this

refused the reason for dragging was not the fact that he turned out to be an accidental passenger there. this , so to speak, coincided with the custom that protosevich resonated, but it was on that wave, so to speak, when these events were still elderly. yes, there were no such sanctions, which were introduced against russia and belarus after a special military operation. we had completely different terms of trade and other things, and then this one resonated. nobody remembers him, when you remember, once they shouted very much for the freedom of the protosevich. now he has been released and the silences are using you, and i have uh said more than once. to our colleagues in the political struggle who stand on each other in the other camp and who cooperate with foreign intelligence agencies. they are a tool. special services. they work very hard. it’s like a surgeon, if you need to cut off, cut off, if you don’t represent any benefit from the point of view of your intellectual development of access to useful information. at the moment

, they say goodbye to you. in in this case, a person remained alive and healthy and can still benefit his state. not only does he not plan to leave, we will not let him out of here. well , he understood, we will not let him out of here, therefore , he will work here in belarus to work out and, in general, we must understand that we are dealing with this issue. seriously, it's not something. you know, this systematic work is indicative. i mean, please come. show active repentance. if you don't cooperate and send you here, you'll be apart. here you are we touched on a very important topic, because we will really leave now. how e south our neighbor is actively recruiting the sbu, the main intelligence department of the ministry of defense of ukraine, and at the same time leaders. here, gur mo budanov, take it. yes, just recently. ukraine was not going to strike on the territory of belarus, all statements about this are false, and most recently the kgb

clearly told us on the facts that a terrorist attack was being prepared for may 9 and the traces lead not just to ukraine they lead just to the gur mo and personally budan. why is he like this loop war? listen, there is an information war going on. this is an exchange of disinformation, stuffing, and neither side can fully disclose their plans and think, therefore, on the contrary, you can think and vice versa, you can think like that, but in any case, several alternative courses of action are always considered depending on the emerging situation. and there is no need to be surprised here now that some kind of sabotage groups are penetrating the territory of the russian federation, i said that these all events will take place even before the start of a special military operation before the start , you understand that it will be a great tragedy to push our region into a regional conflict. and we will unfortunately have to reap the rewards. today we reap them, therefore

, surprised faces, especially those experts who spat saliva and said that in 3 days they would hug beautiful ukrainian girls who would include flowers for them. today i am amazed by all this absolutely, predictably was the scenario that was sought, the united states america is a special military provocation by the united states in europe, to which, unfortunately, the russian federation has been blown out to respond even today. we are reaping the benefits. our task for belarus is not to be drawn into this glory to god, our leader demonstrates the most sensible position , he is, let’s say, a supporter of the most effective settlement of this conflict, we are doing and making every effort to ensure that the parties agree, we do not throw logs on the conflagration of war and while our e, special services and power unit they are doing everything to ensure peace on our land, all citizens should have a hand in this, because we will talk about this in

the near future. uh, olga yurievna, what do you think? here budanov makes such statements protoseevich at large and as an example for many? i think that this is really real, we should get used to it, we have lived in the world for too long and today we have these things that are, uh, textbook, they seem amazing, but to the fact that there will be sabotage groups to the fact that there will be informational war to that there will be throw-ins. eh, to the fact that information needs to be filtered and that there are official statements about what is happening, in fact, these can be completely different things, because we say there is no trust at the political level, at any level today , really. we are in a state of hostilities, therefore, i think that this situation is one that needs to get used to and learn to respond to it correctly according to the laws more than wartime. the same peaceful but also the buddha to us only apparently now it's real. let

's listen to the mysts in the crimea you will go, if it is direct sevastopol sevastopol will be my relatives in the past, there are still 3 million. uh, even i am loyal people. turn around, even the loyalty of the duel has been forced out of the psyche by the disappeared works , too, just stretched to the right block of appearance. seen fair. to our understanding for pvc people, maybe they will go and physically mean? to whom does the future work before fate? this is the logic of bandera, has not gone away, neo-nazism dominates, as the ideology of the kiev regime justification the physical destruction of people by today's top state officials, and

the kiev regime - this is actually a signing to what their nuremberg trials are. learned nothing. they call on ideological ethnicity to destroy the massive population here. e. here. this is where you have to believe. this is an ideological stuffing, with which they think that they are cementing those who are inside the kiev regime, that charged , uh, bandera rod. and we need to understand that they are ready to produce it and with us. here we were talking about the fact that there budanov said that they were not ready to attack. and let me remind you that before the swiss, before the events in grodno, zelensky spoke about the facts of non- attacks, let's sign it. now, apparently, it seems to me that in our special service it is necessary to be ready for a new series of these

sabotage and the purpose of these sabotage is to undermine stability, undermine the peaceful existence of the belarusian people and every belarusian to them. they do not care about the health of belarusians, their task is to bring chaos to us and sow discord between people. our mission is to unite and mobilize. this is what our response should be, we must be vigilant. sanych well , terrible words and i understand that this is a merciless opponent, he will not watch this peacefulness. well, in principle, he called everything by its proper name. what did they think of him. firstly, they are terrible. this is a crime, so this statement about the destruction of civilians is a crime. but you have to understand this absolutely clear element. information wars are intimidating citizens of the local population. uh, ukrainian politicians political scientists experts urge them to leave,

settlements. it is said that the local authorities will not be able to ensure their security element of such intimidation demoralization. you have to understand, this is an element of war. in any case, we are in a state of conflict, the bitch of ukraine yes, we do not have an open armed conflict. well, as such, there is a conflict, and this war is already underway. i just want to remind you that last year is not to mention it. this year it has been prevented 10 times. everyone is talking about budanov budanov forgetting that there is more such an organization as the sbu, which is actively operating, i constantly say that we have here on our territory, uh, 100,000 refugees from ukraine. excuse me, but even according to approximate statistics, every thousandth of them is an agent or the sbu or the mountains. and this is what we need to say. sorry , but still raise vigilance, i

constantly talk about it, what if we looked at something earlier and missed it today. it's impossible for you. we are in this conflict. we participate in it and to ensure their even safety vigilance. citizens should have today more than 10 times more than one of our neighbors - this is western , poland, yes, it is necessary to increase pressure on the lukashenka regime and make one of the strategic priorities of the council of europe when joining a free belarus to the european family sounds like a threat. it's not a threat. it's a pre-election tone. uh, bargaining with the americans. uh, the poles are the polish elites, today they are selling themselves and their role in the american system. western coordinates and poland sees itself as such, uh, prometheus supposedly carrying light, but

in fact western expansion and belarus is for them help for belarusians, he means. well, definitely not flowers. if we listen to their top analysts, we will see that this help is to become a buffer zone that has a permanent conflict with russia the first moment and the second moment, the market for polish goods. here, if we say, what is a free belarus is equal to a puppet of warsaw , but, that is, warsaw watching washington in the region. unfortunately, we do not like this scheme.

uh, we should, as much as possible today, in relation to poland , draw a hard line hmm on the one hand, and on the other hand , seek out all the forces within polish society and the polish elites yes, even alternative elites who complement belarus in the same place and there are patriotic forces that they say let's choose the path zero problems with neighbors there are such forces, and they are already in the elections, there both 12 and 15% are gaining a stop of ukrainianization or a stop of the americanization of poland, all this sounds. why because the issue of sovereignty and independence of poland paradoxically , it may sound very beneficial for belarus that poland be a really sovereign really independent state, and not a puppet of either berlin or washington. it solves two problems. the first is pre-election for the party, and the second he must think about what

he will do next, how his further political future, and as president he can no longer be completely elected another person next year, and therefore his statement. they are no longer national, but of such a european level. i do not agree that poland follows e purely in line with american policy. for a long time they do not put their eggs in one basket, and today it is important for more. here, the americans will not help them , it is important to establish themselves as a leader in the region, so they are pulling over the entire eastern european policy. the so-called make themselves the only experts in the field. uh, until they succeed, but the statement. they are just direct evidence. well, the two main topics that are being heard this week. this, of course, is the drg in the belgorod region, and the second is the prospect of supplying f16 to many. they say they won’t, but we remember how it was with tanks they said that there wouldn’t be tanks, now

we’ll figure it out. well, let's start with drg ivanovich, what was it? it was a special, let's say, operation , uh, the armed forces of ukraine. true, they did as if again proxy-proxy, yes, americans do it through ukrainians, and here the ukrainians did it through, let's say. so volunteer national detachments. yes, there were russians there , by the way, there were belarusians. we participated in this operation, that is, we have nothing to do with it. it was they themselves who carried out their operation, but in fact, this is just a test of the strength of an arrow, and in this case, the russians showed here that they have nothing else in the rear, and today the fact that along the entire length near the border with ukraine they it will be necessary to build up weapons to build up weapons. uh, to create

some kind of military formations, including territorial defenses, as it is done in belarus people are not military, but they reason in this way. just yesterday , the ministry of defense of the russian federation said that 70 saboteurs had been killed. yes, but there is a question. why then did the ukrainians put these e, well, dozens, or maybe maybe it was a lot more people in order to divert attention reconnaissance in force, and then on the other side there must be some kind of continuation of a certain main outline. blow, if you distracted or they simply put it for the sake of informational effect, most likely it is connected with the so-called artyomovsk so-called take everything for them. distract attention, yes, and show your population that they are still strong. here. it seems to me that this is the main goal in the treatment of stuffy, it is to informally show.

speak if we are in artyomovsk tens of thousands lost on both sides, no one thought there were souls, what we are talking about even this even. well, it's not serious to discuss 70 souls war. understand that the war does not surprise me that a diversionary divorced group of ukraine penetrated the territory of russia; it surprises me how the knife went through the butter. she's there, that's what surprises me , along with the technique, you know or not. today is real. they demonstrated that hostilities can be conducted on the territory of russia , lord, a kilometer. and when you and i were in illusions about the fact that the west falter, we do not completely no, i immediately say why they are not completely ukraine has much more motives until the end ukraine has much more motives until the end they believe they believe that they are defending national interests and sovereignty. they think this is their position, and they have the right to think so, because they managed to rally on this topic regarding the supply of weapons. i'm just

lower back. i ask, not out of my naivety and sentimentality. i'm talking about the fact that it was your words that continued that thought about that we are dealing with an enemy who, judging by budanov's statements, can become our enemy at any moment, who will not count his losses. it was understood that the worst action was to arrange a caricature of these people. they are very well prepared and strong, an army that today knows how to fight both with nato weapons and with soviet weapons, who are ready to die and who understand for the sake of it. what i don't fight. to be honest, the belarusians would not understand what to do in ukraine, not a single one was, i don’t understand the belarusian, understand? no, they understand that they what needs to be done and what is their ultimate goal of restoring the borders of the ninety-first year, plus they do not have the opportunity to refuse, because washington stands behind the line literally in continuation on the human

factor, in order to really dot it all it is necessary and it was clear that we are really here. we are not just blowing some bubbles. we are analyzing the real situation. we are well aware that in kiev the human resource is not valued. he performs his own tasks. the day before, the gaspar got in touch after all. i mean nikolai sweden, sbu agents who, as you know, are behind the sabotage, and at the airfield in machulishchi and here he is in his appeal to zelensky from the kgb pre-trial detention center says that zelensky so you sent us here, but here i am in minsk and no one of my fate moreover, he is seriously worried about the fate of his family, who remained there, yes , why is such an attitude of the kiev regime to its own citizens, who have performed and are performing a strategically important role, in order to answer this question, you need to look. how what is the task that the language customers set for

ukraine, and the task is a clear and understandable afghanization of the conflict, that is, for ukraine to become, e.g., such a transfer tool in relation to both ukrainians and russians. what does afghanistanization mean? let's remember that afghanistan was still beginning, what were the americans doing there? yes, they made al-qaeda there, and what is al-qaedo , a terrorist organization, an ideology that makes people simply destroy themselves and others to destroy terrorists, suicide bombers, only an ideology, there was another this salafism and allegedly converted islam is so corrupted by the american ones. again, the secret services. here we have bandera. we will remember. let's go thirties. eh, and he was also engaged in terrorism back then only in other territories. now they are doing this, and here afghanistanization also

provides, secondly, for the spread of the hybrid conflict to the adjacent territory. and we also see this deepening inside russia. attempts in our country. we do not forget moldova, where there were also sabotage and attempts at terrorist acts. uh, here's the question, by the way, and poland can stand, because not everything is so smooth now between warsaw and kiev . so we are faced with a new terror. if earlier we talked about al-qaeda and isis, then today we are talking about bandera, who have their own regime, their own territory , sponsors and those who prepare them. you know this light, i say it again, i added it. the fact is that i still remember, the eighty-fifth year. i would not serve you, and we met for the first time with detachments, talebs, as they say, it was a product. by the way it was

the product of the inter-agency pakistani intelligence and the cia, that is, not only al-qain. would have given it too the same product the same product. i have today. these are the products they are trying to make more and , accordingly, use them for their own purposes. although today. you can talk more about what you understand. uh, the united states, it seems to me that they still use, uh, kiev and this proxy war in general to weaken europe to weaken europe and , in principle, they will solve their issues and then they will simply not be interested in ukraine in europe same per barrel. he stated that a number of countries , including poland, have already begun training pilots. iskra ukraine will receive these fighters . no, yes, the fact is that these are not leopards after all. there are the first a-a.

this is the longest and, moreover, the biggest question here, you understand, the aircraft itself is an aircraft and not a pilot, but there are also technical personnel for a long time , one aircraft needs 30-40 technicians to service it and prepare it for flight, where will you take they are means, so there will be no this hero, when it was also discussed in general the supply, in principle , of weapons and tanks. i said that this is what is being said with the planes already being prepared. the pilot was already getting ready. the pilot that everything will be supplied everything, well, they look, according to the situation. your version will be 100 %. well, i'll just put it in the event that russia will be unsuccessful in holding its own and second. most. the main thing is that washington will not feel an immediate threat to itself . they don't mind we practically exchanged strikes

with tactical uncles in europe in the first place. it is not necessary to compare a nuclear power plant, that is, the emission, uh, of pollutants is much less significant destructive force, that is, they also have. eh, what is it in general, so that you understand what we are discussing e the united states solves three issues that lie in three planes. here the first is the geopolitical and economic and military plane, the geopolitical plane. this means breaking the union e, the russian federation and europe, that is, here are the technologies of western and russian potential, and the next step is the weakening of china, that is, they weaken russia at the same time china and europe , the economic states, again, break the economic ties of the russian federation . the streams were buried again on the eve of this military operation, saying that the first thing that would be buried was the northern streams. and ah, respectively weaken the european union's economic. e, confidence in the euro, in european institutions, in european banks , to

increase production in north america, and to strengthen international control. the financial system and the military aspect dropped all the dirt. all the rubbish from nato all over again the old weaponry followed how hitler used the aggression sequence tactics. first they cheated. i saw this provocation of russia when they deceived russia , they said yes. we won't get involved in 2 days. you will take ukraine first. so they threw away all the dirt. now they are testing new weapons, primarily reconnaissance satellites. so, uh, his use is already waking up. she works accordingly. now they will test new weapons. and that's what it was a test of the pen. drg went to russia they look so, that is every time. uh, here, uh, their some kind of russian red line red. what is the red line limit of possibilities, you understand? i tell you, the truth is told to you all the time in telegram channels. they lie to you about some red lines

, there is the concept of the limit of possibility. if they don't, if you could do it in 3 days, you would have done it in 3 days, you could have done it in a month, you would have done it in a month. and if they didn’t, then they can’t understand the difference, and in principle, what is there some think. so they are so afraid of the use, they are not afraid, tactical nuclear weapons in europe will suit them, therefore, if we don’t stop washington today, they will provoke the involvement of third countries, their task is to include in this conflict, in addition to ukraine, the baltic states, poland, belarus and preferably germany, according to their opinion . i think that there will be deliveries of aircraft and this is not such a big problem with the training of pilots. moreover, it has been underway for a long time and the question is. here even not year and two, and. a few months ah, and i i absolutely agree that preparations are underway for a tactical nuclear weapon. it may well be applied for it needs psychological readiness. and now , uh, deliveries of f-16 leopards. this is the preparation

of possible strikes with american weapons on the crimea . said his russian ambassador to the us pulled back said to be careful with such statements, but we already know what came out of the mouth of the white house is often released in practice. i would like to turn attention to the situation in belgorod and about the organization, because what is happening in ukraine as afghanistan, the americans are not creating anything new. they repeat those well-established practices that are, if we talk about the new. this means that we are facing something unfamiliar. and we can write off something of our calculations. what we don’t know, but we don’t know it, it’s all you just need to be attentive to in detail about this, and what they say about readiness. uh, every fold in the duvet tonight. it's a loophole for the enemy, it is necessary to return to this and implement for the population, including on

the information agenda, what we already know they are american weapons. this is another phase of the confrontation with the russians. i think russia thinks they don't. they have already stipulated that yes, here are the specific operations that they consider. this is understandable, but when this happens, concrete actions will come. what was it like in russia, there was a direct attack on the territory of the russian federation, where is the reaction? what reaction shelling uh, border areas you understand russia, this is all rhetoric and then again they will find 20 reasons to justify it. why not otherwise in your opinion, how should russia respond to specific answers. i said this frankly and do not hesitate to say it. i shouldn't have started it. we began that in this case often now it is necessary to think very strongly, uh, to persons who have access to strategic decision-making. how to demonstrate to washington an immediate threat to their national security, think once you started, if you

can't demonstrate it under threat the integrity of russia and time goes by. now you understand very quickly or not, it does not seem to me that now russia is the main one to carry out the effectiveness of a special military operation. and in order to carry it out. probably, that partial mobilization is not enough, because , well, it will not be possible to transform the kiev regime through negotiations. the whole society is charged and the control system is aimed at terrorist and anti-human actions. i can only say one moment. russian president putin when he started a special military operation very clearly stated the goals of denocification and militarization demilitarization until we have achieved militarization and the most important thing in the world. ukraine why is the reverse goal achieved? why didn't we achieve this, because no high-quality

special military operation was prepared. let's speak clearly. we did not evaluate the enemy and his strategy, and it turned out that in the forty -fourth year we liberated ukraine at the same pace. today we take a bang or release, artyomovsk dear vladimir solovyov, who promised today speaks of that it is not necessary to bring it to moscow in order to go back later, you understand why the topic is much more complex and a degree of high reasoning. we will not hide the deep processes in it, but our task is still with you. do not add emotions to where there are already too many and it is very easy to always observe the processes from the outside. we are directly involved unconditionally, after that unconditionally, but everything that has been said here is, of course, true. we continue the most important international event of this week, turkey

second round elections on sunday may 28 olga hryvnia will be hot elections in such a situation, which today are the whole world. uh, in turkey they called the elections of the century. that is, here are the changes that will take place in turkey, western analysts. they say that it will be some kind of titanic change. in fact, it is unlikely that we will see any explosion in turkey and it will be able to affect all other countries. but turkey's elections in turkey are important primarily for the country itself. only then for everyone else for the republic of belarus and very important. this is our main message. this is the choice of the turkish people. we don’t wait, we don’t watch what happens there, right? great. and so, if you look, sitting, here in minsk, behind such expertise, we are more for whom

the more pro-american forces have finally learned what the danger is. what is the danger? you will answer my direct question. here we are more for someone for erdogan or an expensive government, we have no diplomatic right. uh, on election eve. e not knowing the winner of the election. uh, someone to support directly from the point of view. for whom we are , especially the official minsk, we will never say this. we are for, uh, a fair choice for the people. well, i promise, if about american forces in turkey and come to power. it may be that during our august of the twentieth year all foreign countries would say, then let's give it to the belarusians. they themselves have decided in turkey, they see everything is interfering and all countries are interfering diplomatically, and it’s not in our interests to interfere in our elections and, first of all, the regimes that fall are to blame. what is due to the fact that they are weak times do not interfere, and here we have resisted, so we are worthy of being independent

regarding turkey, i explain in russian. yes, there is nothing. so the first thing is the danger in turkey, what is the danger, if forces come, uh, which will be independent to a lesser extent, erdogan well done, he has to demonstrate independence. following the example of poland, he receives dividends from both sides, so let's say the best option benefits from everyone. tito that was at yugoslavia is tired of the same good option and the west , so this option is more convenient for us there is a more complicated option in russia with turkey on all issues of the middle east , the contradiction in the north south caucasus is a contradiction and so on, and if they come about american forces, so that you understand they will use turkey in order to aggravate the situation and create some more points of tension. this must be understood, so for us, let’s say more, the regime is more loyal to the russian federation and has an interest in collapsing with everyone and not being involved in a direct confrontation is more advantageous. i don’t understand the question is,

what difference does it make to us who will be there, even if erdogan’s opponent comes to power? why would he refuse the russian nuclear power plant? no? or there is no hub from the gas hub, the s400 will refuse to give it either. no abandoned the northern streams. how much you understand one thing, sometimes they can break through the knee, you understand or not, and you are still americans, well done here, learn from the americans. the first is no 150 years of war on the territory enough brains europe so quintessence, idiocy and genius on the one hand. great genius, nobel scientists on the other hand. we all share territory. everything is not enough for someone. all movement is a constant boundary. take belgium, perhaps, or the states of spain three states. take germany, there are hundreds of states, maybe all the time. this is the movement of borders and turkey is very complicated. difficult region and understand one thing, if you bring a person there who sets fire to a match , the entire north caucasus of russia will explode

the caucasus and the package there, when there were such unhealthy moods in russia at the stadiums , they shouted and insulted the inhabitants of the north caucasus, my many friends of the north caucasus, they worked in the state duma, they said we would soon have a family and would see them live in turkey, so a serious question. and therefore, russia is forced to pay attention, including in terms of geopolitics, to what forces will come to power, so you need to understand this, therefore germany refused the most profitable union , russian resources are practically free and, roughly speaking, the supply of technologies secondary ones. moreover, they did not supply the best technologies to russia. they used what to buy expensive resources and recession, the economy itself, so the same is true in turkey. it can happen here. here the question is what did erdogan do for turkey, what kind of turkey did he take 2,000 there, the year turkey was. well, don't let's just say it's not quite right. that's right for the state. prior to this, in turkey, instead of elections, there were many that were decided by military coups, which were organized in many respects, including by

western countries, in order to control erdogan turkey. the first who is these military coups prisyok. we remember the second moment. here, they say, the elections are interfering, who is in these elections the most. uh in turkish , the west tried to intervene in the media . half a year ago , the west decided that erdogan could not win and pumped up various sociology information motives that we needed a sovereignized, more independent , primarily from the west and involved in the eurasian integration processes. this is beneficial for russia, too. this is a difficult partner with him to agree to find compromises for mutually beneficial solutions. well, what is there to do? this, among other things, is beneficial to recall, erdogan is alone. e, the third after putin and gray hair,

he congratulated the president of belarus on his victory in 2020. here is a demonstration of our relations with turkey. therefore, it is definitely beneficial for us to maintain the current course and possibly deepen turkey's inclusion in the eurasian processes in the sco, er, partnership in the eurasian economic union, more active work with the csd. because the turks are not enthusiastic about nato, we need more proactive russia, including the position, then they touched on an important topic, because now we are seeing how the formation of some kind of new world order is going on with such a crash of the old world. although loud. it is said that he is a new world order, but nevertheless in his thoughts. we feel that there is a certain desire to at least start this work, nevertheless. here's an interesting agency bloombergy reports the leaders of the g7 countries and the eu again. here is a strategy for the battle of proposals with russia and china to attract a wider circle of cooperation states, that is, there is a global battle for

supporters, and we recall that quite recently the csto parliamentary assembly met in minsk and the president, while talking , turned to partners and said that we understand. what colossal pressure on our eurasian allies. economic union of the cis csto. but this is a test for building a small snippet from this speech, and then we will discuss what it requires of us our friends. well, we really hope that these are the attempts. weaves tear uh won't affect our unity, main economy. there will always be a main market of problems, and in your states you have already gone through a lot and quite recently, and kazakhstan, uzbekistan and tajikistan and kyrgyzstan, and there are always enough problems in the post-soviet space, but we somehow got together to discuss problems, and sometimes took serious actions to in order to somehow calm the situation in one or another point of the post-soviet space.

it's worth a lot trying to divorce us, so i'm just already an experienced person. i want to ask you carefully without noise. not succumb to these tricks our partners hear. i understand that it is true, despite the outward appearance of such complexity of the situation. this is perhaps the only moment in history when our integration has a chance to solve many. questions and become a truly strong union, that's how you feel it is already communicating with colleagues from other countries in our integration. this is not the only chance to become truly integrated and competitive, because these chances were enough, especially when we were creating eurasian economic union and structures before the eurasian economic union uh, today, uh, the situation requires political will. first of all, this is what the president is talking about, and

understanding the image of the future for each state. everyone individually must make their choice today. here is that choice. it is much more important than a chance for general integration. everyone has to decide where they are going and work out those steps. when we had peacetime, we did not really think about it, we solved the working issues of customs tariffs, restrictions, barriers and and so on, but today this is a more global issue. and this is what is needed. to solve and complicate the situation is indeed the strategy that the americans are talking about today, but in 2001 after the eleventh of september. uh, when the cry was thrown by america and uh, terrorist attacks in the united states became a global problem, then this is a habit, it has become established, because we responded , including the republic of belarus, but today we see that they are in a very difficult situation. and we need to seize this moment. today their offer is already weighted

it doesn’t have such a thing as before, and we need to create this counterbalance. this is the great chance to work on the mistakes, never again the united states of america and the european union and their partners that have joined them. in this tough sanctions policy, they did not have such premium opportunities. in this, i see. this is an important topic, but the main thing, you know, behind all this, one cannot forget about the current tasks that we face on current issues , the president gathered a large bloc to to discuss, but just health care and alexander lukashenko, he continues, how to keep the bar in front of him and in front of the vertical, no concessions and amendments there to conflicts to sanctions. that's health - this is also a safety issue. let's take a little snippet. now let's see which gives the atmosphere. and the importance of this task is another acute problem - the availability and quality of assistance to the population. i never

ask you for the village. never remember, this is first of all the governor. i'll skin you, but you you will put things in order for me, there is order, and all controllers , lawmakers must make decisions. they report to me the faps are starting to close. well, close, optimize , nobody minds, but first you have these complexes on wheels, start which you don’t want to replace dads, and then close them, and that these dads are so dear to us, one person walks there as a paramedic , sort it out immediately. yes, we don’t need fapas that are inactive, but where people live hundreds more, they closed the example of russia, and now they are trying to heroically return back. understand what we are doing daddy's district hospital. that's where our people live. but despite the fact that

the meeting was full of details that relate to healthcare medicine, it is with a global ambassador who is not only about this area. but you perceive the heart, as it were, there, it seems to me that this is a fundamental issue. in general , the president always spoke of the belarusian model of development in terms of social justice. a socially just model of the economy and society. and what is it based on? this is our unique experience, affordable free healthcare and education social services that are just as effective when they are available, because if there is no pandemic available in health care, no one will defeat them , they saw it in the twentieth year and for the president. who knows that he came in the ninety -fourth year it is under the flag of protecting the simple belarusian of the simple person of this

social just system that it is important that this system works, so that we do not do it right. uh, fafop optimization. yes, because this is an optimization of the village. and where to the old grandmother will go where someone will measure her blood pressure, but they were engaged, and a patient-oriented person is oriented in health education, so that it is exactly a socially just society, a real state a country for life is not a social orientation from a person, a state-oriented even more accurate person, guaranteed here. i also drew attention to the fact that the whole issue today is generally reduced. here, we somehow forget that the concept of a new version of the concept is being discussed. on security and, accordingly, all areas are considered there, all areas are considered. in this case, too, you drew the attention

of the audience to what is different today. here is the new edition. yes from the 2010 edition. here, where i took part, we were still in the tenth year , only sources were registered. threats, the sources of its rise to date in a new end. well, the wording of the concept is simply prescribed by the specific threats that have already occurred, which are under threat to us. this applies not only healthcare. this is education. this is also the level of patriotism of the population, and so on and so forth. well, in this case, here's how to activate attention in this way. here's to the discussion. uh, new editions of the concept of national security. here it would be. here are ours. what to do all night correct me if i'm wrong, but this is even playing from a security point of view. so well, what is there to hide our enemy. here we see how he wakes up. here is this dissatisfaction,

how information technology works , any dissatisfaction is maximized in internet creates a direction. and here it would seem a small problem grows in scales. well, the whole state. and this is the dissatisfaction. it it will wind up will cling. there, like any choice of 24 years. 25 now in turkey everything is being raised, everything is being raised. and we are seeing the same thing happen in 1920, and therefore, this is also about the safety of the population emotionally. hmm, the information community is also emotional. this is what you should pay attention to, and it is precisely on emotions that all these contradictions are built and introduced on some level of conflict and even civil conflict, in this case, i can only say one thing, then it’s not that people shut their mouths so that they don’t complain when something is bad, namely, the meeting was about this, that there are no plans to beat there on shortcomings, but to eliminate those problems that are in place to perform tasks,

but regarding integration formations. uh, the head of state, not only with constant rhetoric, but also with concrete actions, to show that this is the position of belarus when we took a balanced position traded. they did not interrupt trade and economic ties, they did not attach strategic allies, which allows us to maintain socio-political stability in the country and a decent standard of living, that is, our citizens so far, glory, even in this crisis period. god did not feel the hope that 8 billion dollars broke away from us in the face of ukraine, our export trade turnover. uh, the european union cut off very serious economic trade flows, but we managed to quickly reorient our trade flows. strengthen our presence in the russian federation in china in the united arab emirates and so on, that is, this balanced , competent policy demonstrates its effectiveness, and what lukashenka called for , because he spoke very delicately. he said,

we understand that sanctions can be somewhere. it might touch you. we do not urge you to act to your detriment, but let's not destroy what we have created, that is, wisdom in politics. external belarus confirms the result is confirmed by the result, the same he called for doing from his colleagues. regarding this situation, this is the first it was the national security meeting. you are well done. dmitry absolutely agrees with you. uh, what you said, that they are very u able to speculate on any pain points, remember how they speculated in the twentieth year on covid. yes, it seems, on the contrary, we did everything to save the economy and pay attention to everyone who fell ill, but this topic was turned upside down and then these speculators in the squares mocked people today, what the president says, how much money we invested in medicine. yes it may have rolls-royces don't go to the doctors during the covid period. still, they received increased allowances, uh, equipment is being purchased.

uh, medical centers are being built, but buildings are not being built and equipment is being delivered there, and the question of logistics and the correctness of managerial decision-making arises, when an erroneous managerial decision leads to dissatisfaction among people living in the regions of small settlements, villages and the state drew attention to the fact that using already existing resource potential is needed in such a way to effectively use so that citizens do not feel a shortage, where we need to add a material component, but first of all, effective management and understanding that today this is not just a matter of health care - it is a matter of national security. thank you olga irina i still believe in the stability of our society. despite the fact that emotions , of course, go off scale a lot, the twenties, including him, showed that a significant part of society is stable. and i would pay attention to the fact that today to social justice

you need to add social responsibility, because, uh, we only have a top-down message. but from the bottom up, we are creating a mechanism for the vns, for example, uh, a meeting of all the belarusian folk, but so far we have not launched it into work, and when we talk only about justice, then this emotional component will constantly grow, because justice everyone understands justice in their own way - this is access. e, somehow to the benefits all the time, but in order for these benefits to be necessary to work together and meeting that alexander grigorievich had. uh, just directed not only to show that, uh, the authorities solve these issues. but it is also a call to society to work together. and one more very important point. here, against the backdrop of all those, uh , critical moments that we discussed today , life is going on as usual, and these issues that were decided by health care are different. uh, they testify that we are moving

in the right direction today, we cannot say 100% in the wrong direction, but we are moving. we giving a vision of the future to everyone else . thank you for participating in the program for your opinion today, uh, that's it for today. every week we review the main topics that aroused the greatest interest among our viewers and subscribers on social networks. we offer you to learn the belarusian language on a walk with our tv guides. at one time, konstantin tsiolkovsky was not afraid to predict space flights. well, let's ask glazkov at once for the banner of the minsk planetarium. we also introduce

you to the amazing people who live in belarus and do everything for its development of milk and fermented fermented baked milk 24/7 project, which everyone should see, watch on the belarus 24 tv channel

. in this episode, the situation of the belarusian borders under control today is 105 years old for the border department of our country.