accordingly, now they will test new weapons. and now, that it was a test, pen, again, the drg went to russia. they look so, that is, every time. uh, here, uh, them like some kind of russian redline . what is the red line limit of possibilities, you understand? i tell you, the truth is told to you all the time in telegram channels. they lie to you about some red lines, there are concepts of the limit of possibility. if they don't, if you could do it in 3 days, you would have done it in 3 days, you could have done it in a month, you would have done it in a month. and if you didn't, it means they can’t understand the difference, and in principle, what some people think there. they are so afraid to use them, they are not afraid, tactical nuclear weapons in europe will suit them, therefore, if we don’t stop washington today, they will provoke the involvement of third countries, their task is to include in this conflict, in addition to ukraine, the baltic states, poland, belarus and preferably germany, here according to her opinion. i think that there will be deliveries of aircraft and this is not such a big problem with preparation. checks, especially since

it has been going on for a long time and, uh, a question. it's not even a year or two here, but several months, ah and uh, i absolutely agree that preparations are underway for, uh, tactical nuclear weapons. it can be applied, but it requires psychological readiness. and now, uh, deliveries of leopards at 16. this is preparation for good, perhaps, american weapons strikes on crimea . jackson, he is the assistant to the us president for our security. said his russian ambassador to the us jerked said to be careful with such statements, but we already know what comes out of the mouth of the white house is often regime in practice. i would like to draw your attention to the situation in belgorod and regarding the organization, because what is happening in ukraine as afghanistan, the americans are not creating anything new. they repeat those well-established practices that are, if we speak.

this means to you that we are faced with something unfamiliar, and we can attribute our miscalculations to something that we do not know, but this is not so, we know, this is all you just need to be attentive to this in detail, and then, what they say about readiness. uh, today every fold on the blanket. this is a loophole for the enemy, you need to return to this and implement for the population, including on the information agenda, what we already know they are american weapons. this is another phase. opposition to the russians applies, i think russia thinks they don't. they have already said that yes, here are the specific operations that he considers. it's clear. but when this happens, they will come to concrete actions. what was it like in russia directly and the attack on the territory of the russian federation where is the reaction? what a reaction to the shelling, uh, the border regions of russia, you understand, this is all rhetoric and then again they will find 20 reasons to justify it. why not otherwise then in your opinion? i

said this frankly and do not hesitate. it was necessary to say this not to start. no need to start often now you have to think very hard, uh, people who have access to strategic decision-making. how to demonstrate to washington an immediate threat to their national security, think once you started, if you can't demonstrate it under threat the integrity of russia and time goes by. now you understand very quickly or not, you know, it seems to me that now russia is the main thing to carry out the effectiveness of a special military operation, but in order to carry it out. probably, that partial mobilization is not enough, because, well, it will not be possible to transform the kiev regime through negotiations. the entire society is charged with a management system. e is aimed at terrorist and anti-human actions. i can only say one moment.

russian president putin when he started a special military operation very clearly stated the goals, denocification and military demilitarization, until we have achieved tarization and the most important thing in the world. ukraine why is the reverse goal achieved? why did we not achieve this, because a qualitatively special military operation was not prepared. let's speak clearly. we did not evaluate the enemy and his strategy, and it turned out that in the forty-fourth year we liberated ukraine at the same pace. today we take bakhmud or release, artyomovsk dear vladimir solovyov who promised the meeting today says that it is not necessary to bring it to moscow in order to go back later , you understand why the topic is much more complex and in a high degree of reasoning. we will not hide the deep processes in it, but our task is still with you. do not add emotions where there

are already too many of them and it is very easy to always observe the processes from the outside. we are directly involved unconditionally, after that unconditionally, but everything that has been said here is, of course, true. we continue the most important international events of this week, turkey second round elections on sunday may 28 olga hryvnia will be hot. elections in such a situation, which today are the whole world, uh in turkey called the elections of the century. that is , here are the changes that will take place in turkey, western analysts. they say that it will be some kind of titanic change. in fact, it is unlikely that we will see any kind of explosion in turkey and it will be able to affect all other countries. but turkey's elections in turkey are important

primarily for the country itself. only later for all the rest for the republic of belarus is very important. this is our main message. this is the choice of the turkish people. we are not waiting or watching what happens there. yes and so, if you look at everything here in minsk yes , by such an expert. who are we more for ? to my direct question. here we are more for whom , for erdogan from the road, the correct position is diplomatic, we do not have the right. uh, on election eve. e not knowing the winner of the election. uh, someone to support directly from the point of view. for whom we are, especially the official minsk, we will never say this. we are for a fair choice of the people. well, i promise, if the pro-american forces in turkey come to power. i would like all foreign countries to speak during our august 2020, and so let us let belarusians manage to make up their minds in turkey, everyone interferes

, all countries interfere, and all together in our interests, so that our elections are interfered and, first of all, the regimes that are to blame are to blame. they fall due to the fact that not weak times do not intervene, and now we have resisted, which means we deserve to be independent, i will definitely explain turkey in russian. the first one doesn't mean anything. what is the danger if forces come? uh, who will be independent to a lesser extent, still erdogan well done, he knows how to demonstrate independence. he, following the example of poland , receives dividends from both sides, so to speak , the best variant of tita benefits from everyone. here was the same option in yugoslavia the good stalin is tired and the west, so this option is more convenient for us. there is a more complicated option in russia with turkey on all issues of the middle east, the contradiction in the north south caucasus is contradiction and so on, and if they come about american forces, so that you

understand they will use turkey to aggravate situations and the creation of some more may be points of tension. this must be understood, so for us we will say more. so the regime is more loyal to the russian federation and has an interest in negotiating with everyone and not being involved in direct confrontation is more advantageous. i don’t understand the question, what’s the difference, who will be there, even if erdogan’s opponent comes to power? yes, he will refuse from the russian nuclear power plant, he will refuse from the s400. yes, also no. no abandoned the northern streams. how much you understand one thing, sometimes they can break through the knee, you understand or not, and you are still americans, well done here, learn from the americans. first , there are no 150 years of war on the territory, there are enough brains in europe, so the quintessence, idiocy and genius on the one hand, great, genius, nobel scientists on the other hand. we

share territory. everything is not enough for someone. everything is in motion, constant boundaries. take belgium. can there be a state of spain three states. take germany, there are hundreds of states, maybe all the time. this is the movement of borders and turkey is a very complex e complex region and understand one thing, if you bring a person there who sets fire to a match , the entire north caucasus of russia will explode, the entire north caucasus and there is a package, when there were such the mood is unhealthy in russia residents of the north caucasus shouted insults at the stadiums, many of my friends from the north caucasus , they worked in the state duma, they said, we will soon go to turkey to live as a family, so this is a serious question. and therefore, russia is forced to pay attention, including in terms of geopolitics, to what forces will come to power, so you need to understand this, therefore, germany refused the most profitable union , russian resources are practically free and, roughly speaking, the supply of secondary technologies, especially they did not supply the best technologies to russia. they applied on that for the purchase of expensive resources a and recession a. actually the economy, therefore, in

turkey the same thing. it can happen here. here the question is what did erdogan do for turkey, what kind of turkey did he take in 2.000 in the second year of turkey, which was. well, don't let's just say not quite all right by the state. before that, in turkey, instead of elections, there were many that were decided by military coups, which were organized in many respects, including by western countries, in order to control turkey by erdogan. the first who is these military coups? prisyok. we remember the second moment. they say that the elections are interfering, who is in these elections the most. uh in turkish tried to intervene the west in the media . six months ago, the west decided that erdogan could not win and pumped up informational sociology of various kinds of motives that we needed a sovereignized, more independent , primarily from the west and involved in the eurasian

integration processes, turkey is beneficial and russia, yes. this is a difficult partner with him. it is necessary to agree to find compromises and mutually beneficial solutions. well, what is there to do? this, among other things, is beneficial to recall, erdogan is alone. e, in the third after putin and settenpin , he congratulated the president of belarus on his victory in 2020. here is a demo of ours. with turkey, therefore, it is unambiguously beneficial for us to maintain the course that exists and it is possible to deepen turkey's inclusion in the eurasian processes in the sco, and partnership in the eurasian economic union, more active work of the dkb court, because the turks are not enthusiastic about nato, we need a more proactive russia in that number position, then touched, because now we are watching how the formation of a new world order is going on with such a crack of the old world. although loud. it is said that

the new world order. but nevertheless in thoughts. we feel that there is a certain desire to at least start this work, nevertheless. but an interesting agency bloomberg writes reports that the leaders of the g7 countries and the eu are developing a strategy for the battle of proposals with russia and china to attract cooperation from a wider circle of the state. everything goes global battle for supporters, and we remember that just recently in minsk met the parliamentary assembly and the president. that is, i turned to my partners and said that we understand the colossal pressure on our eurasian allies. economic union of the cis csto. but this is a test for the only small fragment from this speech, and then we will discuss what this requires of us our friends. well, we really hope that these are the priests. the main market of problems will always be and your

states have gone through this quite recently and kazakhstan, uzbekistan and tajikistan and kyrgyzstan and there are always enough problems in the post-soviet space. well, we somehow got together to discuss problems, and sometimes we took serious steps in order to somehow calm the situation in one or another point of the post-soviet space. it's worth a lot trying to divorce us, so i'm just already an experienced person. i want to ask you carefully without noise. do not fall for these catches our partners hear. i understand that it is true, despite the outward appearance of such complexity of the situation. this is probably the only time in history, when our integration has a chance to solve many issues and become a truly strong union. here, how do you feel? you are already communicating with colleagues from other countries at our integration. this is not

the only chance to become, uh, integrated and really competitive, because these chances were enough, especially when we were creating. uh, the eurasian economic union and structures before the eurasian economic union uh, today, uh, the situation requires political will. first of all, this is what the president is talking about, a and understanding the image of the future for each state. everyone individually must make their choice today. here is that choice. it is much more important than a chance for general integration. everyone has to decide where they are going and work out those steps. when we had peacetime, we did not really think about it, we solved the working issues of customs tariffs, restrictions, barriers, and so on, but today this is a more global issue. and now this needs to be solved and complicating the situation is really the strategy that they are talking about, uh today americans, but in 2001 after

the eleventh of september. uh, when the cry was thrown by america and uh, terrorist attacks in the united states became a global problem, then this is a habit, it has become established, because we responded , including the republic of belarus, but today we see that they are in a very difficult situation. and we need to seize this moment. today, their offer has no such weight as before. and we need to create this counterbalance. this is the great chance to work on the bugs, never again the united states of america and the european union and their partners who have joined them. in this tough sanctions policy, they did not have such premium opportunities. in this, i see. an important topic, but the main thing, you know, behind all this one cannot forget about the current uh tasks that we face on current issues, the president gathered a large block to discuss health surveys and

alexander lukashenko, he continues, as if to keep the bar in front of himself and in front of the vertical there are no concessions and amendments there on sanctions conflicts. that's health - this is also a safety issue. let's take a little snippet. now let's see which gives the atmosphere. and the importance of this task is another acute problem - the availability and quality of assistance to the population. i never ask you for the village. never remember, these are first of all the governors. i'll tear off your skin, but you will put things in order for me, there is order, and all controllers and lawmakers must make decisions. they report to me fapy begin to close. well, close, optimize, nobody minds, but you first these complexes on wheels, start which you don’t want to replace the faps, and then close them, and that these dads are so dear to us, one person walks there, the paramedic will immediately sort it out. yes, we don’t need fapas

that are inactive, but where people live hundreds more, they closed the example of russia. and now they are trying to heroically return back. understand what we are doing, dads are a district hospital. that's where our people live. but despite the fact that it was saturated with a meeting on details that relate to healthcare medicine, it is with a global ambassador who is not only about this area. ah, you see, there, it seems to me that this is a fundamental question. in general , the belarusian model of development of the president has always spoken in terms of social justice. socially fair, e.g., the model of the economy and about the society. and what is it based on? this is our unique experience, affordable free healthcare and education social services that are just as effective when they

are available, because if there is no pandemic available about healthcare, no one will not win, and this was seen in the twentieth year and uh for the president. who knows that he came in the ninety-fourth year it is under the flag of protecting the simple belarusian of the simple person of this social just system that it is important that this system works, so that we do not do it right. uh, fafop optimization. yes, because this is an optimization of the village. and where will the old grandmother go? where can someone measure blood pressure? a engaged in e patient oriented human oriented in healthcare education, so that it was. that's it, a socially just society, a real state , a country for life that is not social from a person, an oriented state is even more accurate. here i also drew attention to the fact that

the whole issue today is generally reduced. here, we somehow forget that the concept of a new edition of the concept of national security is being discussed. so , accordingly, there all spheres are considered , all spheres are considered. well, in this case, too, you drew the attention of the audience to what is different today. here new edition. yes, here is the 2010 edition. that's where i took part even we, yes, in the tenth year prescribed only the sources of threats. sources of threats today at the new end in the new version of the concept are simply prescribed threats , there are specific threats that have already occurred, which are facing us . this applies not only to healthcare, but also to education. this is also the level of patriotism of the population, and so on and so forth. so in this case, here's how to

activate attention in this way. here's to the discussion. e new edition of the concept national security. here it would be here are ours today, correct me if i'm wrong, well, it's even from a security point of view yes, it plays so well, what is there to hide our opponent. here we see how he wakes up. this is dissatisfaction with how information technology works. any dissatisfaction that is maximized on the internet creates a direction. and here it would seem a small problem grows in scales. well, the whole state. and this is what dissatisfaction will be. will wind up will cling there like any by choice 24, now in turkey everything is being raised, everything is being raised, and we are seeing the same thing happen in 2020, so this is also about the safety of the population , the emotional information community is also emotional. this is what they should pay attention to, and it is precisely on emotions that all these contradictions are built and brought to some

level, to the level of a conflict, even a civil conflict. here in this case, i can only say one thing, then it’s not that people close their mouths so that they don’t complain when something is bad, namely, the meeting was about this, that there are no plans to hit on shortcomings, but to eliminate those problems that are in place to fulfill the tasks of a colleague, well, regarding integration entities. eh, the head of state not only constantly, let's say, by rhetoric, but also by concrete actions to show that this is the position of belarus when we took a balanced position. did not interrupt trade economic ties did not attach strategic allies allows us to maintain even in this crisis period socio-political stability in the country and a decent standard of living, that is, our citizens so far, glory. god did not feel the hope that 8 billion

dollars broke away from us in the face of ukraine, our export trade turnover. uh, the european union cut off a very serious trade and economic flow, but we managed to quickly reorient our commodity flows. it will strengthen our presence in the russian federation, in china, in the united arab emirates, and so on, that is, this balanced , competent policy demonstrates its effectiveness and what lukashenka called for because he spoke very delicately. he said, we understand that sanctions can be somewhere. maybe this will affect you, maybe we don’t urge you to act to your detriment, but let’s not destroy what we have created, that is, wisdom in politics. external belarus confirms the result is confirmed by the results of the same, he urged to do from his colleagues. regarding this situation, it was primarily a meeting on national security. you are well done. dmitry absolutely agrees with you. uh, what you said here very e know how to speculate on any pain points, remember how they speculated in the twentieth year on covid.

yes, it seems, on the contrary, we did everything to save the economy and pay attention to everyone who fell ill, but this topic was turned upside down and then these speculators in the squares mocked people today, what the president says, how much money we invested in medicine. yes, maybe we don’t go to doctors on rolls-royces during the covid period. still, they received increased allowances. uh, equipment is purchased. uh, medical centers are being built, but buildings are not being built and equipment is being delivered there, and the question of logistics and the correctness of managerial decision-making arises, when an erroneous managerial decision leads to dissatisfaction among people living in the regions of small settlements, villages and the state drew attention to the fact that using the existing resource potential must be used in such a way that citizens do not feel a shortage, where we need to add a material component, but above all, effective management and understanding that today it's not just a matter of public health - it's a matter of national security.

thank you olga irina i still believe in the stability of our society. despite the fact that emotions , of course, go off scale a lot, the twenties, including him, showed that a significant part of society is stable. and i would pay attention to the fact that today social responsibility needs to be added to social justice, because, uh, we have a message only from top to bottom. but from the bottom up, we are creating a mechanism for the vns, for example, uh, a meeting of all the belarusian folk, but so far we have not launched it into work, and when we talk only about justice, then this emotional component will constantly grow, because justice everyone understands justice in their own way - this is access. eh, somehow to the benefits all the time, but in order for these benefits to be necessary to work together and the meeting that alexander grigorievich had it. uh, just directed not only to show that, uh,

government decides these issues. but it is also a call to society to work together. and one more very important point. here, against the backdrop of all those, uh , critical moments that we discussed today , life is going on as usual, and these issues that were decided by health care are different. uh, they indicate that we are moving in the right direction today, we can't say 100% in the wrong direction, but we are moving. we provide a vision for the future for everyone . thank you for your participation in the program for your opinion today everything today. clever quick-witted charismatic is there such a detachment of mammals as

edentulous e, bovine biologist, i would not call any detachment edentulous. you somehow seem humiliating to you, well, yes, be i a mammal from this detachment. i would be offended, it's good that you are not mammals from this squad in front of tv cameras. these guys are not afraid to look stupid. well, probably a shame on me, but i never taught the topic of electromagnetism. so i don't even know what to take something i didn't teach in physics, but he physics olympiad, yes, the republic is a joker. yes? i think it was a joke and self-confidence was their ace up their sleeve. yes, i chose neutral, because free is somehow not physically negative. how can it be negative somehow not humanly, yes, and humanly, as somehow negatively correct. an intellectually entertaining show, i know, in which the important things will refresh

the memory of adults too. is it true that not a single simple mechanism gives a win in work , watch on belarus 24 tv channel. if you if you want to know a little more about belarus, then the best way to do this is with the help of kudrich travel. this is generally a separate issue nowhere else in the world. you will not find such archaic villages on small islands among the swamps, where almost everything is left, as hundreds of years ago, today the situation in the estate museum is about the same as during the life of the national hero, the girl, as close as possible to the interior of those years and literally gets here, you come back in the past to see the majestic castles and feel the spirit of that time is actually easier than it seems that the central entrance was made

specially narrow and without railings so that every year, climbing the stairs, one could touch the house of musicality, which was located in the direction of the entrance , look. the project of the city of belarus and travel online. come on a tour, but remember how ghosts live in any castle in kosovo only on belarus 24 tv channel. belarus became a power after the launch of a remote sensing satellite, but by and large. uh, introducing into the circle of space powers such as russian federation united states france germany we , by and large, as in belarus, raised our production, which we had a beginner in soviet times and, in fact

, thanks to the decision of the country's leadership. the maintenance of this production and a new push after the launch made it possible. uh, not only take. e your niche, having your own spacecraft, but also enter the circle. eh, quite a lot. e international organizations on space, even in such as the international charter on emergency situations. we are represented there too. republic of belarus economic dacha. e, several times higher than the cost of creating the launch of the first spacecraft. e. the economy in space does not consist only in the fact that e data is sold from a spacecraft or some services are provided. the main thing is the launch of the belarusian spacecraft showed the possibility of the belarusian industry and therefore.