[000:00:00;00] or a boy came running and told them that punishers were coming and burning all the trees, punitive operations and the destruction of the belarusian people during the war years, we will show the written testimonies of witnesses and the stories of eyewitnesses of children , left some building then the executioners and starving each story is the tragedy of a specific person who was deprived of the whole country of loved ones by his native home and the right to live by his parents. they took another camp, and the children in another children's camp were very hard on the atrocities of the german fascist invaders on the territory occupied belarus in facts and figures

on tv channel belarus rus 24 will be a damn strong offensive from the ukrainians. do you know how a meteor is before a fall? first, it lights up brightly, and then disappears forever, which makes us look at what is happening differently. it's none of these abstract things that we can't touch and see with you. these are more than specific points of conflict and uneasy compromises. shouldn't she teach people how to live when they themselves have not yet understood the meaning? and i want to twirl to confuse accustomed to playing with a thimble. or maybe you haven’t decided on where to go yet, the author’s view of ksenia lebedeva on the policy of double standards in the project is another watch on

belarus 24 tv channel . sergey anatolyevich good evening. good

evening. i'll start right away with the post. you are the chairman of the standing committee of the council of the republic on foreign affairs and national security. is it possible to say today in 2023 that the time has come when our national security comes entirely from the international agenda and only whether international challenges have become a threat to the belarusian statehood, i will say , so the international situation uh, has a significant impact on the national security issues of the republic uh, belarus ah, but in general our and domestic political agenda. e, defines e, the belarusian people. uh, those decisions that were made, uh, poles by the belarusian people's assembly and the instructions

of the president of the republic of belarus, of course, today a very serious situation is developing in the whole world and around the perimeter republic of belarus on the southern flank. in fact, a war is going on in the neighboring country on the western border of the republic of belarus , nato’s positions are being strengthened, we are constantly talking about this, but most importantly, the head of state , the government, is taking appropriate steps to ensure security. e our e, country. we very clearly understand the emerging situation and accept the topics of response that will ensure peace and stability in our country in order to implement the plans that we have for

socio-economic development of our country in terms of raising the standard of living even higher. uh, our uh people, but in general, of course, the international agenda. today she is, uh, let's say in the foreground of the territory. that is, i really want to emphasize this point, why the international situation? yes is defining, but in many ways in my opinion, no. there are no internal global factors that would now influence this situation. or i'm wrong. i agree with you that there are no internal factors. we are developing steadily calm. we are implementing the plans that were, uh, adopted, including , uh, all the belarusian people's assembly uh, we managed to uh contain. uh, those, uh, then the pressure is primarily economic, which, uh, has been and is being carried out by

western countries in relation to the republic of belarus, yes. after all, our non-others expected a significant double-digit. e fall in the gdp of belarus yes, they expected the failure of the disaster. we can name the figures of 20% more than twenty percent. in fact, in fact, the figure is a little more. percentage is practically nothing compared to the forecasts that were made by economists, politicians, political scientists. i would say so by people who, of course, are not. e friends or partners of the republic, belarus agrees we will say, we will not be engaged in a hatred . we understand that the problem is they are being discussed. they are discussed , including by the president, at meetings rather harshly, but at the same time, there is no failure and there will not be

any more. at least they won't. he is not here it really is not, and this is objectively. yesterday we heard the report of the first deputy prime minister of the republic of belarus, which was dedicated. here is the work of the government of the economy in 2020 the second year. and i want to tell you that the cap is really no slander. there was not, but there was a deep, calm and very professional analysis, which impressed me a lot. as a senator and a deputy, and, uh, we left the meeting room. uh, the house of representatives convinced that 2023 is the year. we 'll work even better, it's important. and here, therefore let's touch on the topic of eggs today. and of course, our national security challenges are more profound, but given that this is your say, the direct sphere of activity.

yes let's start with the external vector last week a meeting of the collective security treaty organization took place and our position is unchanging calls for a peaceful settlement. but why, when alexander lukashenko calls for peace in ukraine, it is not only about ukraine, but much more globally. a well , the most important political event in our country really took place, an off-site meeting of the parliamentary assembly and the council csto. the key event was the meeting of alexander grigoryevich lukashenko with the speakers. e of the parliaments of the participating countries. uh, the importance of this meeting. i can emphasize that it, uh, exceeded the planned time by several times, and once again alexander grigoryevich made a very informative speech and suggested, uh, our

colleagues a specific policy to join a specific policy related to security. e securing peace. but why uh, maybe not all uh, perceive our peace initiatives. well, you know there is. uh, concept of the national interest. but let me return directly to your question today. today it is not even about ukraine that we are talking about a new world order, and here the west and east collide, large countries and countries collide, which over the past ten years, for several decades, have indeed made progress in uh, socio-economic development in strengthening their defense capability , including sovereignty, so here are these things,

and such a policy of such friendly countries countries, as a rule, it is consonant. it coincides with the policy of the president of the republic , uh, belarus so yes, there is, uh, the situation in ukraine, but uh, in general, this situation is out of the scope. even in our region, it is global; it affects the alignment of forces on the emerging alignment of forces. e in the world. well, you will agree that there is a body that could really manage these issues, at least, i will not say to control, yes, but to participate more actively in a just world order , the un security council well, at least. yes, where belarus could be at least as non-permanent member and seriously affect the situation within the security council. let's be frank, there are levers, there are pens, including

behind the scenes from 2007, belarus was the only candidate. here is the eastern european regional group. yes , elections very soon in june, but unexpectedly , the west puts a spoiler against belarus. yes, glory is harsh. in the same place, this process is long, like a professional. yes , they absolutely throw it right in. as he says, how is the last carriage? can we not without irony ask you to count on fair elections from honest people, why are we accused of being a co-aggressor? moreover, the very peace-loving countries that are now supplying armed weapons to ukraine themselves declare that they can stop this war overnight. well, it does not do this and all together. this is because they bombed yugoslavia without authorization 20 years ago at 7 months. indeed, the main task and function of the security council is to ensure

international peace and security, and, in 2007, the republic of belarus put forward its candidacy for non-permanent members. uh, security council, by the way, i will say that at that time i worked as deputy chairman of the permanent representative of the republic of belarus to the united nations and we are in our regional group that we will not compete in such elections. it is not accepted as far as i know. yes , you know it's accepted. come on, here's an african group, it always negotiates internally consolidated. e is working and here we put forward in 2007 the group agreed and until 2021 everything was in order, everything was not in order none. uh, let's say movements, so that somewhere someone puts forward his candidacy. although this is, frankly, not prohibited. well, here's a little more in the kitchen

of this group. uh, it's 24 countries, a very diverse group. in fact, only four countries are not members of either nato or the eu or an associate member of the european union, including this republic. that is, you can see how difficult the political situation is in this group, everything was fine, but 2020 took place. e western e, partners in quotation marks were dissatisfied. they prevented yes with results, they tried to organize us , uh, a color revolution, not a constitutional change of power, and thanks. only, to the courage and strategic will of the president, to the vertical of power, we and i emphasized to the belarusian people

the wisdom of the belarusian people, we survived, but you see, after that they try to us. uh, let's just say everywhere on all international venues. uh, trying to push the competition. or, as you put it, spoilers. but i want to say, so we had the same situation. e in 2007-2008 we were elected in the second most important organ. he uh the socio-economic council of the un and uh, then there were two uh two vacancies went, belarus to romania and again. we didn't like the west very much and come forward, bulgaria here but we managed we managed to overcome this barrier. we defeated bulgaria in the third round and became members of ecosos chenami ecosos, well, back to your irony of course,

of course. you know, the public may not understand these details, but experts, of course, understand, and they will agree with you, that this nomination is politically motivated to prevent the election of a republic, belarus in e. composition of non-permanent members. uh, un security council but right there, uh, we have the opportunity to develop the initiative of the president of the republic of belarus to hold a general global discussion. in terms of e international security, this is the most important part and you know under all circumstances, in any political situation, e, despite the fact that it is enough e, the difficult political atmosphere in relation to belarus, the russian federation is now in the united nations belarus

respect belarus know many initiatives of the republic of belarus are supported , including this one to combat human trafficking, e support, e values ​​of the traditional family in the field, energy, and others. eh, initiatives. therefore, i think that this baggage, this experience , these efforts of the republic of belarus, they will not remain unappreciated. yesterday was just an anniversary. we showed illuminated. yes , exactly five years ago. yes, our president wore the uniform of eastern europe in search of security for everyone, yes. 350 official persons from forty countries you know, behold, i am now obviously already. if only then all those who were there would not just listen. i might even toughen it up, if they reacted more adequately to the president's speech , they would draw conclusions for themselves that would

translate into practical actions for half a million people. today, those who died at the southern borders would be alive, yes, ours and this brother would not have had a murderous war, and there would not have been these conflicts, because of which today the main issue and the main toast that we raise to peace, which didn't have 80 yo, yeah, ok the last few days. that's the truth is the main topic that was discussed in society. this is the topic of ukrainian saboteurs of the belgorod region. well, the truth is that the responsibility for these sorties of the sbu and the west is undeniable. yes, what kind of zelensky do you have? it turns out, but let's speak frankly when 7 dozen 7 dozen servicemen of the ukrainian army, saboteurs, and you so-called russ, who came to russian soil, die there. everything is obvious here. here in belarus we have our own

sad example of a ukrainian saboteur, shvets who made an announcement here. yes, he is facing the death penalty, save me , uh, referring to zelensky, but you will agree that the fate of the former sbu agent does not excite ukraine in the same way as the fate of these seven dozen graves, yes, in belgorod. they don’t care about the leadership of ukraine either. that’s why such stories don’t become an instructive example for the rest. you know, i would even enlarge your series of examples by the fact that, uh, the fate of an entire nation doesn’t bother them about the ukrainian people of many millions. uh, the people, but and, of course, why don't people learn lessons?

eh, well, probably, this is also connected with politics, with the fact that now a very powerful , information processing of people is being carried out, the most powerful information is being implemented information psychological operations, but the fate of a person is in the hands of each person, therefore, of course, the question is uh terrorist threat. he is very serious. he's already out today. he's been out of the plane for a long time. theoretical discussions, preparations, and the implementation of some preparatory measures are in fact going on terrorist operations, and therefore our president pays great attention to this problem.

counteraction and this phenomenon of training of our law enforcement agencies of the armed forces in order to prevent such facts in the republic of belarus, i just a couple of days ago was at one of the large belarusian enterprises and believe me , the main question that people immediately asked was that we, too, are ukrainian the regime is threatening with sabotage groups to deliver weapons and explosives here. we see it, we show it and threaten to seize it, including including any locality. yes, after all about it already there was a speech by analogy. here with russia here. let's once again, are we ready for this kind of aggression, especially since, against this background, the polish general just yesterday, who apparently got a little brainwashed by the american helmet. here he declares that they want to invade belarus as soon as some armed group starts here a little bit, which will raise more. what answers our people to such disturbing

questions, but i want to say that we are senators we also meet very often on a regular basis . uh, with labor collectives. i was also treated. yes, there have been such questions, people are concerned about it, but hmm, i am convinced that we will e through the speech of the head of state. uh, through those activities that are being carried out and through the work that is being carried out now by the media to bring it to light. e. these events before the general public allow us to answer this question unequivocally that the republic of belarus takes this topic very seriously, that the head of state directly involved, he directs all e processes to counter the training

of law enforcement officers so that this does not happen, i will say in simple terms. but of course, the pressure is very serious, very serious, and once again i will say that the head of state frankly conveys information and the situation that is developing around e our country and about what the fugitives are up to, what the same people are up to, who today, uh, opposes the russian federations in ukraine of course, there are also crazy rabble heads and, uh, people who doing self-promotion. and if it’s special stuffing, it’s hard to evaluate this ex-, uh, polish general. what is the intention? but the fact that there are people in poland who sleep and see how they will return to our territory before

1939 is indisputable, and we should not take this, you know, er, a little lightly. uh, what the wrong times will not allow, for example, uh, our alliance with the russian federation. yes, we have a single regional grouping, which is carrying out appropriate training. now we have tactical nuclear weapons, the republic and belarus actually joined the club of nuclear powers. but we do not plan all these deterrents. we plan to go beyond our borders to protect our borders, our territory and, first of all , our people, so that they live in peace and safety, and raise their children. well, i will say so lyrically and delighted life. it’s just that

sometimes i want to remind you when i captured more, captured part of our territory for 2 decades. yes, before that somehow our borders were a little further there. there was polyanskaya bialystok somewhere there, just a little bit. well, all right, there is one topic that does not seem to be related to the topic of our today 's conversation, but very, firstly, m-m informational sonorous and is actually directly related to national security. yes, elections in turkey are a new pro-american candidate. operating. well, let's just say much more sane and wise erdogan. is it possible to say that this is the first time that a color

revolution, possibly in a country that is a nato member, and what threats this may entail for us, including in fact, the situation is really very interesting and extraordinary, experts say that such a development of the situation is possible that nothing is needed in the country. well, events can develop according to the scenario of the color revolution , of course, annoying in washington. uh, it can be out of control for them, literally. yes, he is uncontrollable, at the beginning he acquired an e -s-400. e, then e does not impose sanctions against the russian federation. e does not block the bosphorus , they will transfer it. so here in this

export program. uh, food from the horde that is. well, let's say it doesn't obey in simple terms, but washington loves to obey, say in simple terms it will first of all leave the interests of the turkish people. yes, he defends the interests of the turkish people and, let's say, he is uh enough uh, serious and strategy tactician. uh, but due to the fact that the economy is, uh , quite complicated in uh , inflation in turkey, and this did not allow him to come out, uh, come out victorious. uh, in the first round in the previous uh elections. he easily coped with, uh, elections and won quite convincingly, but i want to say that here already, uh, probably entered and uh,

a training manual related to uh organization. it is not for nothing that we have included in the new concept of national security of the republic of belarus , such a concept as ensuring the electoral sovereignty of the republic of belarus. why because, including 2020, taught us what the west has become? it is very active to use elections as a tool for changing, uh, constitutionally elected power. therefore, i think that this mechanism and this is a manual. it has already been launched during the presidential elections in turkey. therefore, if you note. yes, she is the figures that they are so very shaky if erdogan were satisfied. well, this is my personal opinion, as an expert, for sure there he would have exceeded

these 51 52 e percent, which, in principle, e opinion polls gave him 53%, but this is 49 point there 30, uh, and so on in hope on the fact that, but the fact is that if erdogan wins and the opposition does not agree, and the position , uh, united only you understand, not uh, not for the sake of a national idea, but against erdogan, which is actually very counterproductive, therefore, the development of events may take a very dangerous path. uh, and uh, attempts to implement a color revolution in turkey can really lead to a civil war in this country. and these are security issues. and this already applies to absolutely all regions, including the republic. uh, belarus we are certainly interested. this is an internal matter.

turkey has elections, but we are interested in maintaining, uh, constructive, uh, cooperation relations, which is what u are now showing to the current leadership turkey let's hope that erdogan already has experience in suppressing color revolutions and attempts at a rebellion or a coup yes, erdogan has a victory in parliament already has a victory in parliament, so well, let's say uh, there is uh, all expectations are that this is a victory in this parliament a significant advantage, and there the majority of his party received will be reflected in the second round. uh, voting in favor of the current president. well, god forbid, french is another important economic economy that makes up our security, as a determining element. yes, on monday the president received

our cool ambassador in russia with a report. eh, today and yesterday he himself is on a visit to moscow , including a participant in a business forum. i am from belarus maintains a positive balance with russia, the main thing is that our building of relations, it does not only take place from the top with the center. as they say, yes, but also directly directly in contacts with the regions. and it gives results, but let's