let's introduce you to the belarusians, who deliberately exchanged the city for the village. olga chose a place in general, yes, for more than a year we liked the very nature of these hills that are located here. here i got out of the car , saw it all and understood. it will be here they believed in themselves and achieved results. in your favorite business. at first there were six horses, then it became more that we really introduce long- distance hikes and we even started distance runs. this is already a sport with the task of leading learn all the subtleties of the life village and try to master an unusual

occupation. to be honest, i haven't started doing anything yet, and i'm already tired there sheep, yes. come on, come on, come on, come on, sign me up for nails. watch the show i am from the village on our tv channel.

i needed these minsk agreements to get at least 4.5 years to form the ukrainian armed forces with nato of the finger, this gain in time was very good for ukraine and now ukraine can not only give an answer, but also receive the necessary support. yes, she was right to say that, because we wanted to buy time to give ukraine an opportunity precisely during these seven years. ukraine appeared in russia needed. good evening. we

will also do two. one for vovan is great, the idea is enough for two. well, let's divide them, though into two conditional blocks. how did you get to such a life, and what to do with it? let's start with the azov naming of vovan and lexus , if it's your own, well, everything is somehow clear, but more or less, in fact, the original was vovan 222, but then the journalists began cut cut. well, just something for nonsense, what is the pseudonym? yes, when. well, actually, when i decided to do this, well, there was a prankster site. it was back in 2006 . here. well, and there it was necessary, of course, to register. well, the first thing that came to mind decided to write there vovan back

van one back. he is free for two. well, it's all good. and here i am to you numerous anecdotes from childhood procrastination. they somehow played their no at all well. listen to jokes they write that there, and you have become, yes, a source for memes. this is true in including with my participation. well, as far as i understand, your partner lexus is a combination of two words. yes, luxury and elegance. well, let's just say it's the same principle, uh, on behalf of the derivative on behalf of alexei, but i probably wouldn’t put some kind of luxury here, after all, probably, greek is such a greek bias, uh, my name. well, that is, well, elegance is present at the moment when it all began, we did not think about how some would look. yes, and how far it will go. well, you know here in the combination is very good, yes, such

an aesthetic and a hooligan. if in a certain sense it is that it is probably the easiest to remember it is somehow simply yes, than the name and surname and in fact very well. so for the information field it is good. so you pranksters , you can say, well, not quite in the classical composition. yes, the profession we call it is prank journalists. well, because pranksters in the classical sense are you walking around the city to you guys run up an omelette 16 and put a bucket on your head and say, we want hooliganism from them. we we check your reaction. how do you react? this, perhaps, was the program of such a town, respectively. yes, this is probably the prankers of that classical period. what is the point is that it is more, probably, entertainment. this is a joke to laugh at. and why do we prefix journalism, because we still have more journalists, because this is already interviews with people and obtaining

basic information that is further published for society, but it is published in such an unusual form that there are elements humor is present. not always not always. new speech. they are there, but in general, how and who came up with the idea to turn into the most scandalous call center in the world. well, actually, not right away either. here, let's call the ministers. let's call the presidents something else, yes, and at first it was more like hooligan entertainment, because when we decided to do this, because prank was always like this underground and it was customary to do the opposite, keep your head down and publish your face, because and the guys called, there are two categories b mostly or some city crazy locals who covered obscenities with crazy screams. well, they also liked it, and because a normal person. we just hung up and would not take everything, they called him once or twice,

as if there was no reaction, but either they also called approximately, but the level of city crazy. these are our show business stars. many. well, then little was known there ksyusha sobchak moses in kirkorov but, for example, they call lalita there. ah, and for some reason she says, i'm in the dressing room right now. so i don't have panties on right now. that raped the fact that an unknown person calls her. she is such a frankness with him or borya moses in which various receptors told. and how to be treated for some diseases to spread? something like honey stuck out a window somewhere. that's what they were. well, purely purely, as they say, eat a couple. well, we also did this, and to some extent, and then, there came a moment when i wanted to do something more interesting, i guess. and let's go m-m wrote to appear some news follow the news of show business, there, let's say, and we see some scandals, let's say there is one singer, but he quarreled with

the singer b. we call the singer, but the singer used, and he thinks together. not yet, here you get some interesting information. but at first it was just published, then they also made those for pranks. ksyusha tell me, come on, here, in short, uh, there was such a big story. but the singer abe you do not want to call. why is this so relevant? yes, we think, by the way, it's usually dangerous to talk about a plan, because people who can be victims these plans, they can hear it and prepare. well, initially it was still more of such secular journalism, that is, to get somewhere inside the scandal to find out what was there and therefore it didn’t have anything special with the public. well, there were also stars who benefited from the fact that their name is mentioned from the fact that they do not constantly speak, they also

received their benefits from this. but if there was still some kind of click, and let's work together. uh yes, well, it was the fourteenth year of 2014 when we met in person, by the way, for the first time, and somehow we decided that the topic of ukraine appeared in our country, er, we got joint interesting to this topic. so you thought, why not, and we counted over 100 pranks. but how many of them were real. we keep records. no, unfortunately, but more than 300. i remember, if we take our old not blocked, at that time not yet blocked youtube channel , there were somewhere around 350, in my opinion, pranks. yes, far from everything, and the problem is that we forget many, that is, they tell us, and you talked with that person, damn it, but for sure , and moreover, you immediately remember that there was some kind of story connected with this, very funny. that is, in general, how we promoted it, how we bred it. well, we

already forgot about it, because we have it somewhere on the shelf, and he remembered, so for sure, well, well, there is some kind of statistics. and at least this is how you understand percentage and hot calls. it's cold, mind you. which yes, they didn’t pass, well , there are also many of them, of course later, because if everything had been so perfect for a long time already and before biden got through and everyone elon wanted a mask. so, let's say i was waiting for something when they were reduced by a much multiple. uh, how since we started this, we've become more famous. yes, but we always think that it didn't work out today. why not try? tomorrow, according to a different scheme , come up with another one, or an experience has appeared such that we are about. well, first of all, we are developing better, now the legends. we have our own experience. we have an understanding of how it works. and we'll admit we wouldn't even try if we understood that there is a big risk, that is, if we communicate with a person, we look here,

firstly, we should be interested in that, well, not only to you, but also to the audience now. second, we look at complexity. well, that is likely. the probability that if it is there the probability is great, we simply do not take up this case. look at macron trudeau. johnson merkel erdogan. duda bush yes, that 's soldenberg, yes, but in the report card and the ranks, who is the biggest booty with yours, because you are discussing. listen, this is cool. it was the coolest pro. well, we never do that. some top, we are also asked, often the funniest or there is some for you the loudest for us. they can already tell the oldest one we had. yes, he has not yet been released, but we will not disclose, but a very interesting person. and by the way, i would say that, probably, one of the most significant people, including in the history of the whole world, to which

we are of the 20th century. that is, it will be. he was still born in the time of lenin, therefore, well, he did not see lenin. i didn’t see lenin, but he played a colossal role in history, so he was, of course it's interesting. it feels like i guess, of course, who we are talking about. okay, but with some. after all, you talked several times five times, uh, we counted zelensky with poroshenko several times a record. this is stupidity, well, on their part, yes or they just really have no one to talk to. and so they crave this fellowship. well, we will basically think over such schemes so that it is interesting to our interlocutor, so that he gets in touch, so that he thinks that this conversation will not only bring some benefit to us, but to him, that is, he thinks that in this way, it will also solve some of its issues, and of course, yes, there, probably, sometimes correspondence or with when we

communicate with assistants we write there. we want to get advice from one of the wisest people. in the world, well , there is something like that. yes, yes, the role, of course, yes, of course, but poroshenko is also a very sociable person. he's always coming somewhere. he constantly wants to enlist, even in retirement, some connections, and he has them, and he was also the minister of foreign affairs at one time. therefore, when he became president, the first thing he did - it built bridges with different people in every possible way. and we are this. well, you can say, i actually wanted to ask this question directly. yes, it occurs to me. sometimes there is a feeling that most of the pranks are based on numbers and people are drawn to this, especially from among the mainstream politicians. here a person wants to return to remind himself again, but to light up in the information space, and i looked with denisova, for example. yes, you know it well, but now it’s really somehow. such a grandma mind, that is

, no one talks about war crimes to me they say, uh-huh. and you can write that a is a prison. on zaporizhzhya it is necessary that official sources - they gave it. and the commissioner doesn't want to give it. it's because they don't tell him, that is, now the commissioner for human rights. he writes only what he is told at the president's office, so we have now decided in this way. so it asks me to power. well intelligence. it was classic. here is an example of what i said, but it doesn't happen to you. it's a pity for these people, these departed ones, yes , who just crave attention so much. here this public, what are you ready to say? well, i don’t really want to go there, taking care of safety.

these people, unfortunately, also have such a large bloody track record. therefore, if we were thinking about whether to feel sorry for them, well, probably, this question is inappropriate here , because we understand who is in front of us, we understand that this is a public politician and , accordingly, that the things that they arranged only for such unfortunately, the method can be used to obtain information about what denisov actually is, this is just a classic an example, because we are further used, because she just organized a conversation with poroshenko. she, because we communicated further with her, continued to correspond on whatsapp. and there we say, we will invite you all the time. give a lecture, then go to congress. this, of course, she was very happy about, and we ask, accordingly, but can you still organize some conversations there to help? we would like to hear an alternative opinion. here, maybe poroshenko, there might be some.

avakov, i'm here, so we have good ones with them relationship. now i will write to him. naturally. we don't have to work here anymore, because i work for you. it's all about a real person. he will not check poroshenko, is denis really real, because really, but she was interested, she just hinted. let's do more let's work together, and she says, i'm still working, still. i have a helper there. we collect references there, we send them all the time. this is all inventing and again to her roll, if there weren't all like her statements. if it were not for such fakes, then these western partners of ukraine would not supply so many weapons. how much is now going there is not the main thing, but in fact, such information stuffing, they play their role. they play their role, because ukraine is armed in the future and those people who are those parties that used to take a neutral position.

when they watch on their television that only barbarians orcs live in russia, that in belarus it definitely hasn’t gone far. well they watch it all and they begin to believe it. and these are people who hold positions in parliaments. they then vote for it and everything and the weapons go there. this is what they sincerely believe. many what is happening. yes, this is a common technology, but i understand that you cannot open the entire kitchen. but how a prank is born. here you two sit down. yes and talk we need to talk. come on with this. yes, he's interesting. it's public now. he is now, as it were, generating newsbreaks. yes. here you can tell the story of any one, on your choice of the most interesting or one of the most interesting rights in general means of communication, because there is, well, we don’t particularly disclose them all, because so

cool. the scheme - this is what people often ask us, so where do you get phone numbers from the special services, right? or people also think that somewhere we take, well , let's say they give the fsb numbers there. they have a phone book. there is prince harry billy isley, almighty many journalists have a very good phone book. yes it is and we say that when people say that it is possible obtain only through special services. these data are now uh, uh, in recent years , channels have developed, here are the so-called breakouts, because where you can buy information for each person for some small money, and these are criminal cases. including russia, these are not special services. it's just that some law enforcement officers are not clean at hand. yes, only law enforcement as it turns out. yes , in our twentieth year, housing and communal services were drained. we

are talking about this and m, but we don’t use it. we don’t buy anything by such methods. we have everything pretty open. well, to be honest, and the second part is already people thinking, so we got this number and call at any time of the day and at night we talk to this phone. hello hello. this poroshenko says this, and poroshenko well , of course, let's talk to you. now we will be half an hour at any time of the day or night, although the conversation with a politician, especially there is some kind of large value. it is always quite a long story, because you need to get on the schedule, agree on the schedule , prepare for this issue, you need to be interesting to your interlocutor. that is, if you will tell him, and the topic that does not concern him at all, most likely, will not want to communicate, as far as i remember, the bird harry came out through the topic, they say this tombler. yes, yes, well, we then, with the help of greta , probably 20 people, and politicians ended up in the hollywood defenders business then.

it is very fashionable to be self-protective. this is a trend that works when some kind of public figure is created, which is also promoted by political technologists and talks about thunberg does not hide the fact that she is a project of the same soros, and she is not just a political project. she becomes a media figure already such a secular figure, well, a symbol of certainty, yes, and she is promoted as a hero of our time, respectively, here the method was chosen that you want to communicate with the hero of our time, that is, when communicating with authority, this is called political technology. yes, among these people. he just played from great there really were a few people, but there were probably three people, who are serious about e, dealt with ecology, it was interesting for him to communicate, the rest or wanted to play. well, just how is it wow here's a new star at all now to join, so that she comes to them

and they do it. some kind of joint project , the second part - these are people who wanted to promote themselves, especially politicians. for example, kamala harris and i talked to the vice president of the united states, she was running then, and she , and they sent a separate letter, and you don’t mind if it means, but kamala will talk to greta in her office and at the same time kamala will be filming it the conversation of her operator. well, it's clear, for what, to the young audience that the fan plays there. and now, so that they vote, though i'm afraid to ask, which of you was in the role of greta four girls of different, diverse, sensitive control. yes, greta’s father from the guy, so that if anything, control the conversation so that he doesn’t go there, especially with politicians, but you never know there is some english on the phone for a 17-year-old girl, that is, english depending on the character, if a conversation with some then a specific e leader of the state? if

the figures, then here we find translators, as was, for example, our french translator, because he speaks english to me at all, that is, you just stood above your soul and, roughly speaking, dictated what to say? no, we said it ourselves, he was then transported. yes, a professional translator. here, let's talk a little about the topics now, uh, in the top, for example, nuclear power, but you are not nuclear physicists. i see that in each of your pranks there is a very deep preparation with knowledge of the material, not only the environment of a person. or there his there habits and so on, but also understanding. what is it all about. here's how you approach it and how much the first source has to be shoveled, if we take some general political stories, then, in principle, it is not difficult, because for so many years the power industry has been doing this. let's say that nuclear power has also been doing this there. yes, we

had those. torture is not done until the age of 86. the fact is that here, after all, since the internet now exists, if you skillfully use it, you can find those topics that are relevant today, yes, and continue to dig further. well, in this or that in this or that question, because there are some articles of those people, who understand this and yet they cook here, of course, yes. or, for example, an expert , that is, we can request some personal experts who sometimes come to our programs. we ask them what worries people now. here in this area, hmm, and here we are trying to explain something, what is really, here is the question. what is the conflict here? there will be a damn

strong offensive from the ukrainians. why don't our military registration and enlistment offices catch the majors of the deputies of the officials of their children? do you know how a meteor is before a fall? at first it's bright lights up, and then disappears forever, which makes us look at what is happening differently. these are abstract things that we cannot touch and see with you. these are more than specific points of conflict and uneasy compromises should not teach people how to live when they themselves have not yet understood the meaning? i want to confuse twirl used to play in a thimble. or maybe lebedeva’s direction for the policy of double standards in the project has not yet been decided - this is another look on belarus 24 tv channel. their way of life cannot be called

familiar to most people, part-time work i say super, i worked for three days at home. all my friends are like that, they all have everything moving, we don’t have enough time, but it calls. where are you? i'm at home, let's go to the forest. well after how many 10 minutes will i be thinking outside the box allows them to transform ordinary ordinary things into something beautiful in essence. if the engine of some kind flares up with him. that is, it is for scrap metal, marina is melted down. and i give them a second life tugane burns this metal melts sparks beautifully. i like to do something, i bring home to break stereotypes. look at tv channel belarus 24. we recognize you behind the architectural monuments of belarus of different eras

of hardships, placing just one palace does not make much sense. that is, in any case, they also had to earn money, as if for a beautiful life, so ilvarov was nearby, external and internal azdoba. a leg or two of us about the architecture of the baroque of the eighteenth year, we will share the jews, ticking facts, in general in classical architecture, in general in ancient architecture, any element is divided into three parts of the column. so there is a base that the architecture of a particular temple frantishka xaviera. uh, here uh, its greatness and i come across not only the scale and uh, the hallway weakening the facade. look at the architecture of belarus on belarus 26 tv channel. name, for example, the longest period

of preparation for a particular character and name this character. who was the conversation with? well , let's say now it's hard somehow for bush 2 months. this is precisely for the conversation itself, or in general from zero to working out the whole. in different ways, well, from the last, the most, probably, the longest - it was with prince harry there for 2 months there was a story two month. well, there's more. probably through messengers. you tried to contact him, but to find a person's contacts, but you went out. in general, if you mean, the preparation for the study of the material is thematic or something else. well, i think one day is enough. well, if not really some kind of highly specialized, a story on some kind of topic, you write out something for yourself where some question here is interesting, and how would it be for the audience. well, you read some thematic sites, yes, which it

ever played a role. that's it for getting it right contact, that you are here some thing, uh, important for the interlocutor, it became fundamental for him to agree to talk. well, in general, when something is agreed, e is never reported. hmm, relatively speaking, your proposal , the proposal itself, always sounds in the conversation itself; this or that policy, we look at what he is now interested in. what topics does he develop? where it attracts attention and accordingly. here, uh, we can also include this topic in our list. what we ask for a conversation is good, everything seems simple, but why do many people still see the kremlin’s hand in your project? impossible

because it’s good, because people love conspiracy theories and it always seems to them that some kind of strong hand is behind something them. it is difficult to imagine that everything is much simpler and as it is, therefore, probably, all the same, in the first place. uh. well, because they put themselves, i guess, in our shoes. well, why then the opposition, let's say so refuses to admit that let's say sobchak is a gzd depot project. i honestly don't know, well , they don't want to admit and the opposition is a lot of many people. they say that we do not cooperate with certain funds. uh, we are not connected with the western secret services at all, and then it turns out that when we manage to communicate with their handlers, everything is revealed. well, let's admit it, after all, your pranks really work very well for propaganda , including not only russian, but also

belarusian in the good sense of the word. i i would say that they work well in the west, because in the west, in addition to the fact that there are some mainstream media, whether it be cnn fox news , there is a very developed alternative point of view in social networks, which is professed by many independent journalists. uh, just recently fired and tucker carlson could nus by the way, one of the k stories he remembered us and then was fired. i think it's not because of this, yes, but this is an alternative point of view, which is not represented in the west. she's popular there in the sense that on social media, well and do not allow e to be present on the main channels. it then goes through the social networks, we open the eyes of those people who, uh, thought that everything was not following, according to

these median. well, then how would you answer the question. can there be patriotism for fun patriotism, maybe in everything? why not? that is, through a joke, including a joke, it can be present in those activities that are patriotic, well, okay. you called your activity a prank in journalism. at the very beginning of the program, you can deny for a long time progress and wince at the mention. this is the artificial intelligence of manjoni chatbots. yes, but you can not slow down and make it work for yourself. here you are not afraid of competition from outside and artificial intelligence. i think it's too early to talk about this at all, because we have our own, uh, principles of work and we can't tell them anywhere. so it is not written on paper or on the net, so

it is quite difficult to teach artificial intelligence in our principles of work. well, we ourselves could, maybe train him somehow, but it would take time, but the opposite side. she doesn't know how we work. we just won't know for a long time. yes, and in fact, everything is much simpler than it seems, but still you definitely don’t use it. there’s just no such technology that could normally generate an image of a person in real time, she herself spoke on the air, yes, and it’s not there, so that your fund did not speak from behind. yes, a couple of years. we have some programmers, and they showed their developments there. we really have a lot simple, but designed for a fool, as they say, but this does not mean that all our interlocutors are like that, you understand, here probably uh, if hmm would work someone who uh, won’t make you believe in yourself by voice, then we would

n’t have there was some success, because the fakes did not help. this is what helped them. yes? okay then the subject question. probably he is simple on the subject that's it. it works so well, including for ideology on propaganda yes, there is no need to spread this as a separate subject in journalism, or are you still piece goods, how uh? one of you. marked us invited. even somehow create a university there. yes, they wanted to create a department of the course and our course, moreover, so that other figures besides us would teach there. uh, inform, let's say politicians out of sight someone came, but we said no, firstly, we do not vouch for the fact that it will turn out well. we don't know what kind of students there will be. and if you don't know, but it can be used against us, the simple question is that it is monetized.

well, now we have our own project on rutube and we are official ambassadors, we have a contract with youtube . so, in this, various events there, and we are leaving, we are doing something there, yes, we will make a show to say such a product content, and yes, yes, this principle, it will not harm the country iron for you. and it’s true that you really profess it, in fact, right? and there is another principle. well, we have a few of them, relatively speaking, those things that we adhere to. this we do not touch or the religious theme, we do not touch the national theme. we do not touch private life. and these are our principles, because the country is a country of strife, there are countries where these jokes well, they will take it relatively speaking, otherwise 10 people will be shot surrounded by this or that leader, and we just won’t go there for

this reason, but there are countries where relatively speaking, in france, a macron walks down the street , passers-by hit him in the face twice. that's what's more offensive, when the president is not considered a leader, or the fact that we called him and he squeezed out just what we have, in fact, it's excellent. well let's have a little blitz then which is scarier. your call or the call of the former at night, especially when the rate is drunk, yes, yes, probably ours is still worse, because the calls of the former. they'll probably run out by the next morning. a person will oversleep, yes, and then there may be some kind of reaction from the public, the press, and there you will be persecuted. for example, one us congressman head of the intelligence committee is still a year old. probably four, or more than 5 years, at least he is still being bullied on twitter. here are the various

users of you played developed there, type of russian rights always conducted an investigation against russians. you blamed them. and you and yourself fell for this next chiport 30 apartment is more indicative of putin or einstein. if he is in our apartment, then he is rather not indicative. a direct call if you are talking about us, something like this, to see now the face of the interview, is it gold or a failed prank in general , silence can be said a lot, so if the interlocutor is silent, it means that it also says a lot, a lot of excellent with interesting facial expression, and who is easier to play politician or showman? politics is absolutely accurate, even so complex showmen buzova or

biden. well, by the way, biden is much more interesting than buzova, what are these people for, with whom he virtually and virtually constantly greets, who buzova is not, you know such people, if you say so, this speaks only in her favor. yes, if you say so, well, i would not put them on a par, maybe biden and paul mccartney, then in this case biden is easier, but a peacemaking proposal. heart to heart with putin everything is clear. it's all here it's clear. and unfortunately, many politicians do not heed his call, so any bad peace is better than war. well u treats were very strange. in fact, the proposal , because he said that for peace it is necessary

to collect, a thousand sith, and they must meditate at this moment, and therefore, accordingly, peace will come, such an interesting proposal was not implemented. so far, yes, zelensky was offered, but something has not yet been collected almost the last question prank is this punishment or justice? we never used prank as a punishment, and we don't always treat our interlocutors negatively. the viewer always decides, who is this person in front of him, maybe he will listen to him and say, but well done, the idea is something that was necessary and happens repeatedly. what, well, as a rule, these are the people who sympathize with him, of course, and the opposite side says, what an idiot, we never say, not there, that there is some kind of idiot. he is against it. uh, there are their own countries.

see what he does. come on, let's all go outside. let's shift power such. no, we always post the password and people make their own price was such a failed horn in politics. i'm not afraid of this word, we also have our own guaido. yes absolutely right, according to all the characteristics there was a prank earlier about the fact that she had nothing to wear. yes, well, yes, yes, there is not enough money in the thick. there and so on. they are generally interesting to do, right. well, for show, it was rather interesting to make a prank from and on her behalf. uh, pranks with various politicians or these so-called funds that work in western countries. that was more interesting, because they really influence something. and she somehow it is unlikely that i do not understand the issue, that is, which one should, in fact,

understand. she is her retinue, yes, which is more led by this retinue, not by her retinue. then why did the vandalized lexus still call again? well, we came to visit you and decided that's why. just for you thank you for the gift. let's see him, alekseevich somewhere small victories somewhere hard going. now we'll all be with well no we will take our position so that they don’t lift sanctions on potash ah with lukashenka well , there are many countries on our side, but there are those who labile the lifting of sanctions. here, now we have six additional information that children from ukraine were taken to belarus, we are also working with

this to bring lukashenka and everyone who is from belarus to justice. they also hmm took part in this, so this is one of our arguments. here uh. and so, in principle, everything is according to plan. lukashenka unfortunately. who is lobbying for the lifting of the sanctions? can you say valery georgievich good afternoon? this is southern europe and let's say the countries of southern europe with connections in latin america but because they were the main consumers of potash fertilizers, and they have such an interest. then they connected, including the un secretary general who, uh, is one of these engines of this, and this is also, in a certain sense, tied to a grain product, and since one side of the grain deal, uh, is russia, which

turns out, among other things, the ability to supply their potash fertilizers to world markets. well, in a certain sense, this question is connected, uh, with the grain deal specifically with supplies, and fertilizers to world markets. how can we put pressure on the russian oligarchs? here in this series everything that is own must be pressed on everything. we just have a slightly different context from russia, well, look, the deployment of nuclear weapons is already a huge threat, because it is, uh, the constant uh presence of russian troops for maintenance. even after the change it will be very hard uh, kick out eradicate. uh, the russian presence from belarus uh, we bring the method to our foreign partners. uh, well, there is no such active active position, and all the structures that we are building now were able to, well, come forward as a united front, frank, please.

and that all the goods from china from russia through belarus and there and in poland to lithuania, lithuania and poland can be completely closed cordons at a time, because the church of ale smile, there was a thunderstorm, and the kolyvanerievs were brought to such a husband. well, they're assholes. yes, at least it would such tools cod on and on putin and lukashenko kolybtsy close sakurdu in mind, climb. it would be as strong as in schools and for snakes for zero split. elite uh scenario a lot maybe but we were preparing our double our plan and hmm our democratic partners. e. at home we can do? we have our own plan. and you?

we have a military plan, what do you have? and i can say that we have a plan that is being worked out now by our western partners, but about what actions, what decisions should be taken, but also with our side and from their side in case something like this might happen. and yes, that is, such work is being done. uh, there are already, but there are some basic outlines in ukraine, uh, after kormilovsky himself, well, they obey out loud. these are not ours, they are belarusians, but they are subordinate to the ukrainian army. and at that moment we cannot simply order them to help us liberate belarus, because they are not subordinate to the ukrainian ukrainian. well they are ready. this is where the jokes end. i understand, let it be emptiness

a set of common phrases, and you yourself see that she herself does not say anything, practically cannot, that is, she does not know, we immediately treated this way, but the fugitives do not have any plan and there was not an important point that needs to be identified for these 3 years, as it was not on the eve of the elections. no, it's now 100.000 million armed fugitives. this is just a kolenovsky battalion, which is not even subordinate to the fugitive. he is completely supported by the apu, and all the hope of the fugitives is only for the armed invasion of the west and the state, 44. belaruskale and all state-owned enterprises, as well as what kind of people who work for them, they should all be crushed by sanctions. this is what i took out of here, yes, but the worst thing is they are going. there, sitting abroad, to act as a united

front with the west in relation to their country against their country. how did you get this prank? and what was connected with this, we will talk in the next program, but for now i have the last question, scoundrels are sometimes called you. well, you don’t think that such a future that is being prepared for belarus is a real meanness. well it is clear. at we have the same people, and also they are sitting in the west in lithuania in washington in warsaw and they are also preparing something. well, or rather , it is clear here, in principle, who yes, as it were, is the only leader of this entire company, and we have been for many years. they could not even find a single leader, and now i still continue to share this skin of an unkilled bear among themselves, so the real position is real of some kind of force. basically, we don't have any. they are just like in the movie the crown of the russian empire, they are trying from hand to

hands. there were two of them, like an heir. yes, and we have their pieces. i don’t know 10, probably, they are fighting for what, not for there, so that they understand that they are unlikely to ever, but return to russia at all, return to power in russia they are fighting among themselves with funding for grants yes for attention of various organizations. 250 million. they are just trying to portray the activity of at least sucking among themselves. well, it’s enough for a couple of years, but you have fewer of them, so divide it into a smaller number. there, after all, the story is something else that, probably, with us and not only with us the first time. we sympathized with her that she ended up in a bad company, one that used her in every possible way and was somehow doomed, including for family reasons, since she ate 15,000 data and the president there. yes, really here.