[000:00:00;00] well, today i plan to hold this project as part of such a talk show, i think this is a very useful and important event, because you can learn a lot of new things on them, which in the future will help in life in development, i really like being here every day. we have different competition events. competitions master classes concerts. this is the second season of the republican action. step to success. this year's project. enough of the country's 140 health camps theme. the speakers. a variety of education support for youth initiatives and start-ups, health and step to the athletes of olympus. at 19:00 more

information about the meeting in the evening edition. we talk about the most interesting from the world of sports inter milan became the first finalist of the champions league and made it to the title match for the first time since 2010 exclusive interview with athletes and coaches today's game showed that the guys can play good football we have shown ourselves well, we will definitely try to pick up preparing for the tournament will not be easy, but we are preparing now so that during tournament show a good result bright moments and real emotions. it seems to me that the spectators enjoyed both yesterday and today there were interesting matches, tense matches. we really liked the room about it. watch in sports projects on

belarus 24 tv channel . here are your roots and your strength. go forward to come to yourself, slow down and enjoy the moment, and the elements will tell you the direction. every step with nature wild ancient belarusian who changed the future of europe how

the deal of the century influenced the formation of the european union wild map of germany why did the industrial power of the state go into decline along with the resignation of angela merkel akilo missed, who is building a new empire on the ruins of russia moscow berlin paris greater romania why are they forming a system of checks and balances in the intermarium project europe of different speeds contour maps change their color trends, length 700 km and 33 years from the berlin wall to the polish fence, how we ended up on a new round of the cold war, who is behind this and where the world is heading in which we live, we'll figure it out together. the berlin wall, as a symbol of confrontation between two civilizations, has long been dismantled into separate fragments for souvenirs, generally installed

as art objects throughout the european union, a kind of admonition to descendants, and not the admissibility of escalation and confrontation in europe, as time has shown, individual politicians turned out to be deaf and far-sighted national interests , gave way to personal ambitions, and the walls themselves began to build significantly east of their german. maman , the confrontation line came close to belarusian border and it happened long before 2014. i absolutely agree with president putin when he says that we started this war. it didn't even start at 14. she started well before 2014. we saw. everything that happened here, that brown coup that took place, we saw what ukraine was being led to, we saw who was in the forefront of the options , there were many options for people to live peacefully in ukraine throughout

ukraine, but not the former yanukovych there and poroshenko and the current zelensky what is not used? why didn't they use it? did they want war? no, they were simply pushed to this by the ukrainian crisis , indeed, not the root cause, but a consequence of the destabilization of the region, dozens of western factories of thought worked, what used to sound like some kind of conspiracy theory today has concrete factual evidence. the main foreign policy interests of the united states throughout the past century during the first and second and cold world wars concentrated on relations between russia and germany because, united, they are the only force that poses a vital threat to the united states. and our main task was to prevent their union. the second world war really had a chance to put an end to any constructive dialogue between russia and

germany. too high a price was paid for achieving peace in europe. however, the renaissance of diplomatic relations began already in 1955 . during the visit of konrad. adenauer in moscow laid the groundwork for the start of full- scale economic cooperation a few years later on the agenda bilateral relations came up with the issue of gas supplies to germany in the white house began sleepless nights soviet gas excluded american coal from the equation, the free hand of the market grabbed the sanctions club of the embargo on large diameter pipes in 1962 , the deal fell through. however, despite the unleashed gas war and the regen sanctions in 1970, the deal of the century was signed, gas pipes already in 1973. the first soviet gas. germany came during the cold war, the united states

and the secular union entered into a series of economic and political struggles, and one of the most significant was the struggle for control of the oil and gas market in the fifties and sixties, the ussr rapidly expanded its oil production and exports. what invariably aroused the alarm of american oil companies and politicians feared that the supply of soviet oil, beneficial to european buyers, would become a political and economic victory for communism and deal a crushing blow to american industry, despite the fact that the united states itself sought to impose a capitalist build where the fittest must survive. let others play by these rules, and the one who invented them has the right to neglect them. isn't that so, therefore, on the way of the face, the americans imposed economic sanctions on goods necessary for the construction of gas pipelines; pipes with a large radius and power; turbines in the union did not exist, and therefore, in order to speed up construction, it was necessary to purchase everything from

european partners european countries whose companies expressed a desire to supply large diametral pipes successfully lobbied for the removal of bans on the export of such products to ussr introduced by a specially created anti-communist committee. however, the united states did not make concessions to european countries , a ban on the supply of oil and gas equipment to the soviet union was approved. in 1999, the minister of foreign affairs of the ussr, our compatriot andrei gromyko, offered the frg and other european countries the rates of soviet

gas in exchange for their pipes and oil and gas equipment , the barter scheme did not formally violate the existing restrictions. italian companies began to work on similar terms with the participation of their own banks thanks to this scheme , construction of the world's first transcontinental gas pipeline urengoy began in the early eighties pomary uzhhorod at first, the united states did not oppose cooperation along the gas pipeline. in order not to escalate tension between political camps. however, after the coming to power of ronald, reagan, the eighty-first united states. again began to actively restrict the soviet energy sector through the provision of loans for gas projects. the same french considered the ussr a reliable partner and provided loans at seven and eight percent per annum, although western borrowers were given courts no less than under. 15 yes and among

reagan's advisers were less belligerent, who believed that imposing restrictions on beneficial cooperation between the soviet union and europe would lead to significant conflict between the united states and european countries and the latter would simply refuse to comply with the requirements of the united states, but the imposition of martial law in poland in 1981 allowed reagan to introduce a large-scale sanctions against the ussr, including a ban on the supply of oil and gas equipment for the urengoy gas pipeline pomary uzhgorod , the tightening of sanctions a year later led to epochal crisis in us-european relations and 1982 germany france great britain italy declare us sanctions illegal and resume deliveries of oil and gas equipment to the ussr washington failed to convince its european allies that cooperation with moscow undermines their energy security. i had to take it off. the ban on the supply of his political adventure began to turn into tangible

self-harm in the period of the forty-fifth to ninety-first year, the european allies of the united states did not initiate western sanctions against the energy sector of the soviet union, they only joined it, often under strong pressure from the states. decades later, the chief european gardener admits that the well-being of the eurozone was based on cheap energy from russia. germany received not only an incentive to develop its own industry and strengthen the economy ; the position of the gas hub helped to sew together the disparate countries of europe; laws and regulated the entire development of the eurozone. frau. merkel successfully balanced within the union for a long time and fended off foreign policy challenges. she perfectly understood the role and significance of the established axis moscow berlin

paris germany and merkel became the wild map of europe , obviously this was the reason for the scandal with sworn partners in 2013. it turned out that the united states was tapping mech? consistently defended national interests. here is an example of her statement in 2016 . i'm in favor of gradual rapprochement russia with a european economic space, so that we eventually have a single economic zone from lisbon to vladivostok , such a development of events is not only contrary to us interests in the region, the union of germany and russia challenges american hegemony, it is about the formation of a new center of power, which would have to not easy to reckon with. and perhaps even listen to the recommendations. at the same time , merkel was not limited to economic cooperation with russia in 2014, with its

submission, the chairman of the european commission becomes jean claude. juncker a year later, on the cozy hand of frau merkel, he throws heavily american military bases in the european union, how do you like this statement? a common european army would show the world that such an army would never again be at war between eu member states. it would help us implement a common foreign and security policy. realize the responsibility of europe in the world subtle trolling in diplomatic language provides for a gradual bias away from nato towards a sovereign european army sounds like decoupling of the european union further more similar statements began to be heard at official events from merkel eland, and more and more often with the mention of independence from the united states the boiling point, after which the cap was lifted in the white house, was the statement about the withdrawal of american nuclear weapons from germany, and

the european trend towards sovereignty will talk with a bundestag deputy from the alternative party for germany hello eugene since 2017 , the withdrawal of american nuclear weapons has been actively discussed in germany. why with the coming to power of scholz? the topic has left the german agenda. i think it’s not the case after all so much in the scholtsy as in the foreign policy conjuncture, that is, now during the ukrainian armed conflict. uh, of course, no one will raise this issue among the ruling german circles, that is, the united states, on the contrary, predicted its position in europe, that is, its dominant position. and now, uh, let's just say no one dares to question american interests on german soil, so the conclusion. uh, bass with atomic weapons here in germany is not on the agenda yet. well, i think not in the near future eugene will stand in your opinion. what consequences could the formation

of its own army in the european union lead to? whether this initiative runs counter to us interests in europe in this regard is worth noting. uh, the creation of interethnic brigades, that is, there is a german-french brigades there or there is still there, in my opinion. and so on. uh, it was all let's say. so trial balloons in that regard. uh, that it was once planned to take a step and create their own army, the eu is natural. it all went, let's say, against the interests of nato, which, like a military bloc dominates in europe, uh, because the united states was afraid that with the creation of a full-fledged armed forces, the european union, uh, would become more independent of the u.s. interests in europe, therefore , such attempts, they globally did not lead to any significant success, a now, during the ukrainian conflict, it should be noted that

the united states, to the maximum extent, has its own positions in europe, and today no one stutters about creating its own army, on the contrary. let's say everyone swears allegiance to the nato bloc by all means, that is, they are trying to fulfill it. the us demands that at least 2% of the gross national product should be spent on defense, uh, and so on and so forth. that is, the united states used this conflict to strengthen its positions of its interests. uh, in europe, chancellor salt was involved in a large-scale corruption scandal, in your opinion, the kumax case can be an instrument of pressure on a key german politician. the fact is that such a corruption trail really stretches behind chancellor scholz, and this is not only scandals when he was mayor of hamburg that is, when he, after a meeting with

the leadership of one of the private banks. uh, he was allowed not to pay huge fines from the state. also, already in his tenure as minister, minister of finance. there was also a huge scandal. uh, when is one of uh? one of the so-called concerns, that is , large financial concerns, declared bankruptcy. eh, and it turned out that the scholz department, which was supposed to, let's say, control the activities of this concern and financial fraud on time to open, and they simply missed all those billion-dollar withdrawals from foreign accounts that the concern had been managing for several years, that is, for some reason, everything was turned a blind eye to this. that is, these kinds of incidents are, uh, they are characteristic of scholz, but again, this is all characteristic of german politics. we also know in the case of a lady who is fond of ousting her minister of defense. e germany caused

damage to its department in the amount of hundreds of millions of euros. there were some pretty murky schemes. by advisers. one can only assume that in certain circles, maybe overseas exists, of course. this is se on on these politicians , in order to have leverage on their decision, germany has not yet investigated the terrorist attack on the nord stream, closed the last nuclear power plant in the country, and the imbalance of energy security is gradually leading to industrialization. in your opinion, whether these processes correspond to germany's national interest is naturally undermining. uh northern streams. it was the heaviest terrorist attack against a national infrastructure in the whole recent history of germany and the fact that over the course of eight months of investigation, the dead point has not moved , suggests that you are in fact the ruling political elites. there is no desire

to complete this investigation. and the fact that e american journalist all his hersh, published his calculations on the incident, on the basis of which norway and the united states carried out a terrorist attack. uh, against uh, like germany's gas pipeline infrastructure uh, it was all there right away, like a conspiracy theory and without any meaning. sleep the german economy ruled out the opportunity to generously subsidize the members of the european union and maintain mythical unity. poland immediately lost its economic interest in such a union to leave the ship going into recession to interfere with the opinion of ordinary poles, most citizens see their future as part of the european union , try to correct the situation by artificially forming points of tension in warsaw , claim about germany's plans to return their former lands within poland, while themselves

actively raise the issue of new payments reparations for the period of the second world war , the refusal, as a reason for public insult and justification of a logical decision for citizens , the dud and marowetsky regime already sees poland as a new regional leader. all gas arteries lead to warsaw after a series of failures in attempts to drag the flows of russian blue fuel around ukraine over the polish sky, at last. stars aligned country seeks, article distribution center for liquefied natural gas supplies to central eastern europe it was a sign that the volchik pipe opened on september 27 last year, bringing norwegian gas into the country, coincidence or not, but this happened in unison with the september 26 attacks on nord stream. naturally. after the destruction of russian gas pipelines

, the positions of the previous gas leader of europe , germany, were greatly shaken, which gave the green light to hell in europe today. we can say with full confidence that the era of russian domination. in the gas sector , an era marked by blackmail, threats and extortion is coming to an end. means at the beginning of october, pumping began through a new gas pipeline from norway to poland, which passes through denmark; the volume of pumping will be about 10 billion cubic meters per year. below the nord stream , and analysts believe that the launch of a new gas pipeline is unlikely to affect world gas prices as well as blue fuel quotes in europe, but dashing, trouble, start without losing

in the same month, the gas transmission system operators of lithuania and poland successfully tested at full capacity the hippul gas pipeline, which was put into operation in may 2022. the fuel artery provides access to liquefied gas from the floating terminal in klaipeda, which warsaw will be able to import via the gas pipeline and tankers. a little earlier, as if knowing the future ahead of time. a gas pipeline was launched connecting the gas transmission systems of poland and slovakia . the gas river is designed to provide access to warsaw supplies from the southern gas corridor from the adriatic sea region, and slovakia will become more accessible to lng arriving in poland from its birthplace. all in the same norway to stop only on underground highways, warsaw does not intend to polish oil and gas concern. the order plans to create its own gas fleet this year , the company expects two south korean tankers to transport liquefied natural gas, and by the end of 2025 the number of such gas carriers

will reach eight, of course, the development of the country's gas potential has its own strategic target by information, telegraph. poland should soon become a superpower in europe and surpass great britain by 2030. in economic terms, warsaw seeks to strengthen its military capabilities and have the best ground capabilities. among all european nato members, the goal of increasing influence and future dominance in the region is impotent, and it all starts with the language now kiev does not exclude the possibility of including the polish language in the list of subjects required for admission to universities and for integration into the european education area with the inclusion of ukraine through poland in the legal economic social space of europe but without granting in ukraine the rights of the european games and the ukrainian political elites of the rights of the european political so all

poles. well, in what sense is civil news, when civil yes, civil is probably very likely, yes, they do not lag behind the ukrainians and the balts, the prime minister of lithuania said that the teaching of russian as a second foreign language in lithuanian schools can be replaced by polish and this, despite the fact that that according to the lithuanian ministry of education , the russian language. as a second foreign language, it still remains the most popular in schools. polish ambitions are supported by funding from the outside, the whole country is a tool for the struggle of the united states and the uk that left the eu against the united continental europe, a strong euro, a threat to the dollar, washington has one task to maintain its competitive niche or at least slow down its further contraction. to do this, it is necessary to remove the european competitor. poland as a tool anti-european politics fit perfectly with all their fears and grievances

, it is quite easy to interest her. giving money by promising the role of germany in the energy supply of europe plus half of ukraine to boot. theses are being heard more and more often, it is necessary to force unity in the growing systemic crisis in the european union with the use of internal repression of sanctions , viktor orban remains one of the unbending european politicians. the hungarian prime minister turned brussels on national interests, unlike other players in unity, he speaks openly about the problems of the european union for example, an excellent quote. the modern form of european cooperation has been driven by two missions, peace and prosperity, if the union cannot fulfill its two original missions. then what is the whole point of his existence? both of them ceased to exist in europe for the benefit of the national interests of the united states; the ukrainian case

was played out in full after the merkels left the scene, convenient chancellor scholz with a criminal case behind him, where he should be silent, where they say john merkel leaves v at one time they perfectly understood what the proliferation of a large-scale conflict in europe would lead to and against whom it was directed? yes, today you have to sing along, according to the conjuncture. otherwise, a calm retirement may end quickly, but it was they who occupied the crisis on the minsk agreements, zhumaniv ok in 2014. we helped bring down viktor yanukovych, who was democratically elected president. ukraine , we spent 5 billion dollars to get rid of him, then we put in a government that we personally prepared 2 months before and the first thing the new government did. it adopted serious repressive laws on donbass a. then she violently attacked. on them. killing 14,000 people. for several years, this war

did not start in february 2022. it started in february 2014. in fact, the younger one could tell us much more interesting facts. the fact is that ukraine as a field for confrontation with russia was considered by the united states at the academic level, the strategy of action has been repeatedly worked out in the framework of staff exercises of the current events. in soviet times discussed at the level of the obvious incredible. i know, here recently, in one of the american academy, headquarters exercises were held and there, uh, hypothetical 2.000 some twenty-fifth year, the situation is being developed that russia is at war america is at war with two states, china and russia and the reason for the war is just that ukraine started a war with russia on the side of nato the fact is that the american partners began to strangle ukraine in their arms right at the parade of sovereignties , the soviet nomenklatura was already closely

intertwined with radical nationalists red-brown, tandem loudly slamming the soviet door tried to take the black sea fleet with it, a persistent attempt was made to leave under the jurisdiction of the new state all the troops stationed on the territory of ukraine the actions of ukraine in relation to, let's say, the soviet army and navy is an action that poses a colossal threat to everything of mankind as a whole, and therefore it is quite possible here for them to hold a certain international conference of negotiations, er, related. uh, let's say under the auspices of a karma organization the united nations with the participation, but the leading countries of the world in order to work out certain mutually acceptable solutions. i am opposed to settling any territorial conflicts by force. there should be negotiations here, but this should not be missed. time must not be allowed so that, uh, ukraine has already created such

an army, which, if it creates, it will certainly let in. i do not doubt this for a minute and i believe that today we are laying a minute for not only our future, but also the future of all mankind. to washington systematically walked methodically to his goals destroying the geostrategic balance, in the region that was established between the soviet union and the united states, the system was based on clear international agreements, while in 2001 us president george w. bush announced the us unilateral withdrawal from the treaty on the limitation of anti-missile defense systems in poland and romania , the main subtlety is that the systems can be used not only for protection, but also for missile launches against the enemy , the only difficulty that this the situation arises is the range of missiles

to a certain extent, the development of tests of intermediate-range missiles were limited by the odessa agreement in 2019. the united states withdrew from the treaty and began testing medium-range missiles previously prohibited by the treaty. but i'm afraid that the americans will take advantage of the moment to wreck this treaty and place missiles in europe here, it will hardly seem like it. therefore, together with russia, we need to think about retaliatory measures, there is no getting away from this. if this happens, and it will be even worse. naturally. these missiles will be deployed. god forbid well, hypothetically so far on the territory of ukraine i am categorically against it, we are supporters of a peaceful policy. we do not need these showdowns of large states, from which as a result of these showdowns. we are always based on history. we have always suffered. it seems to me