eh, the leadership of these countries took the ukrainian people hostage, but i get the impression that the so-called leadership of ukraine yes, it is also held hostage here is the question. just why did it hit. uh, in such a situation, this is again a question, including trust in the west, trust in, uh, western countries. eh, so, of course, the situation is developing according to a negative scenario. here i support alexei that e ukraine is already turning into a theoretical, e, state, but for the time being , there is still an organization on the map united nations, uh, other organizations, of course. uh, this is a tool tool in the hands of uh, the united states in the fight against russia uh in rea. strategies to defeat russia and

not only russia not only russia that europe suffers? yes, europe is suffering. this, too , how can we continue this, we proceed to one way or another, that with such neighbors it is not only ukraine but also our western neighbors are extremely hostile. poland is now relaxing, it’s not necessary the other day the president met in minsk with the main intelligence services of the cis where several loud and very disturbing statements were made. uh, for us, of course, i offer one of the snippets. now. listen, then discuss it more lithuania unfortunately, ukraine is also being trained by members of the illegal armed forces, attempts are being made to create sleeping extremist worms, directly in the country recently the facts. you are familiar with them testify to this, especially our recent operations together with him vasilyevich, the territory of russia, belarus, militants. preparing in ukraine they run on

front. some die. there, from among the belarusian fugitives, uh, detachments are being prepared. e in poland, lithuania, the czech republic in order to be transferred to belarus at the right time, and this is no longer the twentieth year, where there were demonstrations in white skirts of short girls with a flower. these people are already ready to come here with weapons in their hands. well, they want to eat there. and you just don’t give money. and if earlier he says, let's say something in the media, now the americans and sponsors, they say, you will fight directly your solution will appear. now we need to carry out terrorist attacks on the territory of belarus, then we will give money. no more what money does not give. just before the armed struggle, the president

said one more unimportant thing, which we repeated here in the studio more than once. why will there be terror extremism? why the bet will be made on rocking the situation in belarus, it is necessary to understand two reasons in a legal way. through the elections, the radicals come to power. they will never come, people hate them. the second reason is military. now it is impossible to defeat belarus after those efforts that the president made it and tactical nuclear weapons arrived this week the new s400 complex, while strengthening the army. borders are impossible. the west is not ready for this. so, the stake will be placed on terror. extremism second millions of dollars since the twentieth year in the fifth column, which sits in poland, are really preparing extremists. does anyone really believe that this money was pumped in? just so no from them really. they will demand the result , and our kgb with other belarusian special services has already stopped more than one terrorist attack. but that doesn't mean they won't. they will be here and in kazakhstan and in tajikistan, and in

all countries of the csto they will not calmly give them fat in kyrgyzstan, we saw the other day. what was ukraine a little bit calm down a little bit. here it will calm down a little they will blow up the next country, the next one and kazakhstan has already experienced it. at the same meeting. they want to squander us. we guys shouldn't let this happen. that's just about these sergeevich here is another and the next continuation. e. here is what is happening today around our borders, what our country on the periphery. uh, the president, as a person with maximum information. he clearly can assess what is happening and brings. it's up to the people bringing it to everyone who needs it. and most importantly, what he does, he shows our ailments, and there are a lot of them. we have named many countries. here for me, for example, it’s even unpleasant to say that poland lithuania are the countries where we once

calmly traveled, and it was, of course, friendly there czech republic czechoslovakia was once czechoslovakia they are all in today in the wake of the united states, they are all ready to solve any task of destroying our state. and you imagine a different situation, we are on our territory, belarus is preparing dietary supplements of the formation, we are preparing extremists and sent to the czech republic to poland in latvia so that in this europe everyone would squeal and squeal at once, how would they start accusing us today, it turns out that in the next they are a little ahead from point of view. perhaps in its capacity and, uh, the information sphere. they usurped her. and these statements our president is being punched through this gap. they give even uto in the west the opportunity to understand, not to mention our state, that we understand what is happening. we won't stop. we will fulfill our task, we will protect the people, we will protect our country, and most importantly, no matter what

you do, we will put forward and we have allies for this, nevertheless. there were provocations, judging by everything will continue. this meeting was one example, because the hand has to be held. what is called on the pulse? well here is the specific one. example, on the belarusian lithuanian border , a citizen of lithuania was detained who tried to introduce 10,000 bullets into belarus in two specially equipped caches of his car , the border guards would have found ammunition for firearms. this is a test of strength. well, you understand, this is usually an episode with us once again they check if we relaxed, we didn’t relax. what can be done and what cannot be done. this adds up to a common mosaic as soon as we relax somewhere. here comes the explosives. this is where the weapon comes in. it will go right there. eh, maybe already militants with large passports are fake somewhere. they will try to shake us in any way, shake our country and take us warm and so that they themselves fight each other. why the president talks about unity ukraine began in the fourteenth year, the ukrainian people

began to kill each other further. uh, the west he would never have fought with russia, this coward, what kind of warriors are there in italy, someone will go to fight, austria is the poles. the same or three lithuanians, so that they grapple with each other. so it turned out that ukraine was linked with russia i didn’t knock down ukraine, pumped up approximately further than they were, to fight. they wanted to split the twentieth year. why is there a civil war, so that belarus blazes, they do the same thing throughout the post-soviet space tajikistan conflict, to make a conflict on the border means , azerbaijan armenia to stage them, that they want to reconcile them, and then the same thing happened in the middle east and the americans of the middle east they cannot win, they have no strength. but that the wired ones killed for days so that the avita kurds all hated each other, please therefore, they have a nerve. reaction to unity they hate neither a single csto nor a single one. i am the eu, their nightmare is russia in alliance with germany, they were horrified when putin came to the german chancellor 10 years ago and talked about

a united europe. now with this rally in europe if you think that the americans are not happy that now the political crisis in france is somewhere else this is happiness. it's the same whatever gets lost in europe the same is true of the post-soviet space and the president warned them all putins. even if they press you, they hear you, you understand who will not hear. uh, it will be worse for this country we warn. and uh, this is our difference from others is very easy. really look for differences between countries and contradictions. here sergei anatolyevich, as the chairman of the commission, ran to the affairs, the council, the republic knows, and he does it. we are working to somehow unite everything. there is a contradiction, there are problems. and we combine i wonder how only falls into the big expert by the way, in the middle east and in the american including you worked, there and there, and that's what we

are seeing now in the middle east as soon as the attention and infusions in the middle east weakened that we saw yesterday. sadovskaya arabia opens the iranian embassy yes, they are reassembling. that's what the president is probably talking about, that we need to hold out now, because then we will be able to calmly reconvene. syria enters this state and returns. i am understanding. uh, that is the situation that has developed now in the world and in the region. uh, that is, since 2011, u series was expelled from the leader of the arab states saudi arabia qatar did not allow this country to return to let's say in the fold, family in the fold, family, but now the new leadership. well, the new relatively young kronsprins. he looks more, with a fresh look at the world and again at the issue of trust. he has a big question now regarding

the united states and trust in this country. uh, that's why, uh, the arab world decided to hear the call of our president, what it is necessary to be together it is necessary to unite, despite the fact that there are certain contradictions. uh, someone loves someone more , someone less, but nevertheless, syria is now in the lag again and i want to say that alexander grigoryevich lukashenko , in 2017, at a high-level conference under the auspices of the united nations , which took place in he warned us here in minsk about the situation in ukraine. i want to support oleg sergeevich, so the president warned. if you, if we are not together, then there will be a big trouble. well, well, even you should see your thought, what is our difference from the west we always first say

how it is putin did it lukashenka did it our other lavrov and others did it. we say we will do. so don’t do it, we warn , and then we do something and now what is happening in the middle east is the reformatting of consciousness, the reformatting of the region after the influence of the united states has partially left millions of migrants, one word in europe and muslims. today the war begins. here is a terrible picture of europe enters a war with russia on a full scale. these millions will go to plunder european houses and join the russian army. that's what the west did in the middle. because they live in germany hate. all this west they destroyed their countries and destroy further. now back to us to our neighbors. now let's move from tactical to strategic. the west is still counting on the scenario of the kiev euromaidan in belarus about a provocation from the territory of poland, quite realistically

, the polish edition writes about this. the thought is polish and the preparations are in full swing. in as a tool, a quote is called, the puppet presidency of tikhanovskaya, and the anti-government media working for the belarusian audience. and also the armed groups of ordinary mercenaries, portrayed in the world by volunteers from belarusian positions. we read further, the authors of the polish thought notice that it is characteristic how angry the polish authorities were, the pardon of the novel, the protoseviches, how the card andriy bachok is played, they need an excuse, they need victims of meat for media propaganda, and not evidence of the mechanism of belarus and evidence of gi. of common sense, aleksey, this is how many people in poland are thinking now, what do you think, what should our viewers immediately explain that if the poles are in the public domain in such an authoritative publication, starting to judge this topic, then this is not

done because some kind of analyst. yes, some scientist there abruptly connected to the neosphere and decided not to write some kind of article. of course not, it's all done. ah, centrally. and all. this is agreed primarily with the nato command with the command of psychological operations. for what was it done? that is, they already form the so-called image of the future. this is such an approach. they have been using it for a long time, probably for the last 30 years, when that's what they want, they begin to immerse the commonality of polish communication with our european one, and the world one in the consciousness that they will already succeed in this, you understand. uh, most they did exactly the same thing and in the twentieth year on the eve of the twentieth year they are what they want to show that uh under any circumstances. we will spend here on territory. we will carry out a dune

revolution in belarus and pull belarus away from russia, but why are they doing this? that is, if they said further, yes, but they do it, because behind them, behind poland , behind those who finance poland, there are financial circles that finance all this and they say, guys , give us more money, because we will definitely realize a project that could not be done in the twentieth year, but it is important, why is this the whole situation in general. look how the explosions have escalated in our region, ukraine. uh, readiness do marigold here, because the most important thing here is gp morgan published the most important statistics. a rate of decline. e. in the world's global reserves began to decline sharply in the sixteenth year, 64% of the global is now 58. moreover, in just a few months. it has decreased by 1%. this is a huge amount and the americans understand that the decline

of the dollar as the world's reserve currency. and why is it happening, because the united states is no longer respectful, you know, and everyone says, well, you fight a little there. we seem to be afraid of you, but we will already trade. and for the yuan we will trade for russian rublikhanovskaya. this is the same story when, despite the absolute emptiness. uh , they carry this political character , they pump up legitimacy all over europe, for which , in order to give the necessary moment of a go-ahead and forces have come, for example, to liberate nato, belarus has to work out the scenario. here, the situation is different. here is the first part of the us offensive campaign which is to create public opinion. international public opinion is now not even on us. uh, up you pressure on the world public opinion on the people on e, the countries on the relevant circles to convince them that they are capable of doing it. this is the first second to create an image of the enemy that we are

evil. this is the evil that needs to be defeated, and then everything on earth will become good, the world based on the rules will return again, which is undermined, and now this is being created, and the most terrible thing of all this, that the west will stop at nothing. we have already spoken on this topic before, any means will not stop, more than one will be thrown to the scenario. here's to people it’s easier to understand on a tank, so that we ask the tikhonov factor, so that nato troops bring tikhonovka in a tank with stewards will not be found here. they want us to hang only in the center, minsk means once again slowly for our audience. they do it for their own, for themselves, for belarus, they have a script for the twenty-fourth twenty-fifth year, an attempt to blow up the situation from the inside at any cost, but the worst thing for us, that we must understand, they themselves do not believe in sanctions. they tried with sanctions, 2 years 3 years to strangle the country

sanctions failed. they have a scenario only for the terror of extremists, only for force by any means. look, i would have realized a couple of years ago that you know, you know, clapping in front of the international community, that you need to create some kind of new guaido, who will give the go-ahead to enter there, release now , we will no longer look. they even set such conditions on us that we do not look at any international communities. we have tactical nuclear weapons. if something threatens us, we will not be well. they will say in the obse with a mouse and thus answer, of course. so, they, after all, they also understand this, but you understand, all sorts of people by chance, you understand, we cannot say in response together. you'll take pens, yes? they need to show shit, just like they won't show it in ukraine. we are not at war with russia. we are not at war with russia. this is ukraine, in fact, already the german leopards, the entire american currency, the poles have already admitted. they are already hiding like prostitutes. how many polish mercenaries are at the front today

, they will always say the same thing from belarus. yes, we are not there. climb. this is internal uh, internal opposition is the same as the terrorist attacks in the belgorod region. it's not us ukraine says, it's the russian volunteer army. the same. there will be two soldiers of kalinovsky’s platoon, former belarusians, belarusians can’t call them language, and out of 100 polish mercenaries who quit under a contract with the polish army in order to participate in special operations on the territory of belarus and a puppet, tikhonovskaya or someone else who books neither did not read one, it will pretend that she wants become president. that's what scenario they are afraid to openly say that we want to change the government here by force. everything is always done under loud words about the democracy of freedom and now there is a new slogan to save from russian occupation. they are very afraid and keep the world based on rules. this is an amazing phrase. we already know what the world is and are based on

rules, in principle, barrel explained to us that there is a jungle here. here is the wonderful garden. that's why for us it will be according to the rules, and for you it will be like in the jungle. uh, very, very afraid of strengthening our status. here we saw the day before, just a circus with the election of a non-permanent member. i mean , the military knows that we kind of said, uh , uh. yes, we will answer, but the political one is this so-called elite. she's just doing her part. yeah, certain promotions, and the military they know what to fight. uh, very, very dangerous, of course, very dangerous, and uh, what is happening now, uh, belarus russia is so fast. increased and uh, the armed forces. here in this part allied state deployment yes nuclear tactical weapons. why is that? very sharp performance screams. i would even put it this way,

because they don’t like it, because they understand that it’s almost impossible to implement that plan, that scenario. yes , the political component, just the day before in 2007, belarus applied for the fact that we will be a non-permanent member of the security council. there are absolutely established procedures for years, no one climbs. it suddenly arises wedged. rather, it is wedged slovenia and surprisingly vote with a majority to take our place. they are this circus and a shame, but a shame not so much for the west and slovenia, this definitely does not hurt us. by the way, we have seen the screenshots. like those who voted for us. well, they just showed that it was so voted yes, the humiliation of the united nations and c. in general. we are probably watching the frame of the organization, yes. organizations, you have been closely involved in this issue. you, it seems to me, your smile did not pass over

this entire period of this entire vote, yes new. of course, i could talk for a long time, because, as i already noted. i worked at this time when we were nominating our country and when in the eastern european group we reached a consensus of a gentleman's agreement that we stop competing with each other, but just draw a schedule , build and go to the elections, as they practically go all other regional groups. you. note also yesterday the vote was put forward nominations from other regional groups. there was a clear number of candidates for a clear number of seats, that is, there was no competition for 15 years. uh, it means that everything was fine in our group, calmly, no one offered their candidacy for a term. 2024 2020 what is it? yes, well i want to tell you that

in general in our eastern european group, where there are 23 countries. eh, a lot of countries. i would call it that, that of a dozen countries that were already non-permanent members of the un security council , not one, not two or three times, this is poland about six times and bulgaria and hungary and the czech republic and a number of others and a number of other countries the republic of belarus as you remember, e in the days of the bssr was in 1972 the seventy-fourth seventy -fifth years, uh, what security advice is not always for us at all, therefore, of course , here, independent, belarus, she deserved her right to occupy this place, because we behaved, as always, very, honestly decent. we are talking about next, the unifying agenda, we

did not put forward our candidacy to anyone, but the company against slovenia by the way, i want this emphasize the republic of belarus did not lead. we talked about ourselves, about our initiatives, about our results. and we have a story to tell, so it's purely, obviously political manipulation, the united states. and uh by the countries of the west, uh, when a candidate is put up who well, i cannot but agree, i will say this, but he works very concretely. oh, by the way, i will say in 2007, when we put forward our candidacy , because we are all around. vaughn wasn’t like that either , you know, uh, the benevolent atmosphere was anti-belarusian resolutions in the third committee that the eu and uh, the us put forward from year to year and we are with them, well, you know, in

a serious confrontation, we even risked once to put forward an anti-american resolution on human rights, so the situation was absolutely. well, almost equal. uh, that's why they break the delegations break the countries, but i think that nothing terrible happened for the republic of belarus, our country has a serious authority in the world and in the organization of the united we showed our slavs. it's not her decision, nor hers. is it you already slovenia's sovereign decision is that they got a call, either from brussels and it is most likely from washington that you should run. is this a sovereign decision slovenia this is the first. second well, once again they wiped their feet on the security council, he and all of it was already wiped by the americans more than once in iraq, they wiped their feet when it was impossible to invade, he wiped his feet against the invaders once again

showed that there is the right of the strong only what we want, then we do. here we do not want belarus to be members of the security council for recreation, but we look, you know, in the eyes of the world, in general lately, like uh, we're building up our authority. why do we not attach the first three principles? it's not only russia that sees our ally. this is seen by the entire middle east africa , we do not betray. that is, if a belarusian said something, if the president gave his word, he keeps it, this is the first, second, we are sovereign, this was our decision to be nominated to the un security council, and we were even pressured to withdraw the decision, so that the third is that belarus defends not a pure interest, you are the third principle, and the whole world sees your own and this is why our authority strengthens. i started with what is already an organization, so to speak. yes, but you know no, another organization more powerful and capable

is still needed.