time konstantin tsiolkovsky was not afraid to predict flights into space. well, we kindly ask the minsk planetarium for a banner at once. we also introduce you to amazing people who live in belarus and do everything for its development. let them talk about sipping milk for sipping ryazhenka, broadcast a 24/7 project that everyone should see, watch on belarus 24 tv channel. we recognize you behind the architectural monuments of belarus from different eras and were ashamed to place it, just one palace doesn’t make much sense. that is , in any case, they also had to earn for a beautiful life, so there was an ivalvara nearby, an external and internal azba. eh , telling us about the architecture of the thief, on the eighteenth we will share teak

facts in history, in general in classical architecture, in general in ancient architecture, any element is divided into three parts. here are the columns. it means that there is a base that you are studying the architecture of a particular temple in front of you, like advice. uh, here uh, i’m great and come in handy from armchairs not only scales and uh, the weakening of the facade of the architecture of belarus on the tv channel belarus 26 in the hallway. hello

viewer. my name is igor, this is my propaganda , let's start sometimes the details are no less important than something global and colossal, and often even more important. i am deeply convinced that in order to tell you about what lukashenka did or said today to know. everything just about today is not enough

to keep in mind, an array of data from the president's theses. at least for the last five years. and even better, at the same time, sincerely try to understand the head of state, understand him and, as a person, understand his logic of actions. what can a journalist or not a journalist do ? there is a phrase of the president sometimes illegal. and from a little less ancient, we need to learn how to live by the law , try to rely on the first phrase in our understanding of politics in belarus. this is a mistake, just like the mistake is an attempt to operate on the second phrase, only an understanding of the president's logic will be correct. or at least an attempt to understand last week alexander lukashenka held a meeting on the results of that very letter of the center. a lysed exam, when the results of the first centralized exam had to be recalculated in the name of the president and the methodology for transferring primary scores had to be changed. as a result, in all the rest, the head of state

said this on tuesday, the next one i will quote on collars with a scoring system. this is where it smells like a rip off. is not it, but there is no speech at the meeting. initially , it wasn’t about this at all. cs, i’m more interested in how we will live on? this we have solved the problem. as i understand it, it is important how we continue to enroll our youth in universities. for a person, the most important thing is health and education, so this is the basis of my experiences, and here's the main thing for people about the details - the president of health and education says. these are just two topics that have been very widely discussed recently in the palace of independence. yes, both of these conversations had nominal health reasons - naturally, reports from monitoring groups and

the prosecutor general's office. in education, this is bucha itself, but in both cases, the president speaks of the need for systemic changes, and not about solving some current problems. as for me, this suggests that such deep meetings on key topics for people, and this medicine and education would be at the level of the president, and regardless of these force majeure. and what will happen next. what other of the popular problems will be next in the discussion at the level of alexander lukashenko, housing and communal services, roads, agriculture? sports, for sure , the head of state will have big conversations on some of the topics and there will be and that's good, because we had the coronavirus, then the confrontation on august 20th after the confrontation with the sanctions, even later, the confrontation, the increased military load. well, at the beginning of the twenty-third , the president of the country holds systemic meetings on health care and education, doing

what he did for many years before the era of our crises. and this is a hint that the influence of some external and internal shocks is subsiding and we are slowly returning to our usual life, adjusted for the war at hand, but that no less. so i'm looking forward to another important meeting with the president this week or the next. with regards to cr and the recalculation of the results , alexander lukashenko explained everything very quickly. i don't question what you thought there? my claims are that people people don’t understand you, but was it really impossible to create a clear, understandable simple system , parents looked at it, but it’s clear that 10 points another looked at 8 points and so on. and you started there with i'm not saying that it was a wrong system, but you created it too abstruse for yourself, the parents of those graduates. who wept in the nights before

the president canceled the first cycle evaluations, the methodology of the ministry of education was correct, but it was wrong to assume that the applicants and their parents consider rehearsal testing to be a run-in of technology. there is no change for sure, everyone was interested in the result in order to figure out who will go where, and when the mechanics of converting points into final points suddenly changed after registration citries, the results fell. and their parents fell into a stupor. sometimes there is something well working and correct in theory, but not perceived by our people. if you want the simplest example, democracy, which exists only in theory , is not bad in itself, but it is bad, firstly, in the perverted form in which it has become in the west, and, secondly, it is bad. it is for us for the slavs, those who are historically closer to the monarchy, although the very democratic great britain, as they say, the monarchy still remains a pillar of society, but still

dictatorship is our brand. let me tell you one situation that i repeat probably at each of his dialogue platforms or lectures. here you are the audience. you love corporate parties, of course you do, do you want to go to a corporate party? almost everyone will answer. yes , because this is a simple message, but then the nuances begin. let's simulate the situation. here is any enterprise last spring calls the administrator. and he says, we are all going to a corporate party, we are going to 50 rubles each. the employee answers once. you are collecting money. it's not from an enterprise. isn't that right no says administrator. we have a really active group here. we we will copy ourselves we will go well? he says, employee, i'll hand over the money, but you won't go anywhere. call when you will return the money collectively conditionally for 150 people. for a simple message. corporate all react positively, but then the question arises.

where we go and when and here the peculiarity of democracy begins, some want on friday, others cannot get wet on friday, but they can on saturday afternoon, the third on saturday evening, the fifth on sunday morning, some want somewhere in a pretentious club , others in a restaurant, which is simpler than the third they want to go to nature, the fourth to a casino, the fifth to a yacht, and so on. what to do create a chat in the messenger? where we will discuss everything for a long time after a couple of days of discussions. all people have already quarreled, 10 have already left the chat, but to a single one. they didn’t come, what we do is vote, we collect more or less massive options for them, it turns out, let’s say 8 from friday evening at the club to sunday morning on the yacht, and of course, none of the options gains an absolute majority of votes, which is done in this case absolutely the second round is democratically appointed, in which the two most popular options come out, gaining 30 and 25%. and now it turns on, the slavic soul. until now, the procedure of will from the phenomenon has been completely democratic, but when the second

round is announced, the electorate refuses to comply with the democratically adopted decision, those people who are not satisfied with both options, who have reached the final, do not even think to continue to play this democracy. they sabotage the tools of democracy. they say that these two options do not suit them, if so, then in general they are not at all which corporate party will not go and vote. you are wrong and anyway, let's complain about you to the bosses and chat after such abuse. this is 40 people in addition to those ten who had a fight even before the vote, there were 150 people who wanted to, 100 remained for the second round. naturally. there is a victory of one of the options with a small margin, for example, 60x40%. democratic everything is clean and honest, but the second round begins. someone will say sabotage, now, if those who left voted, another option would have won, everything is dishonest, we will not go, they will still say, we did not want to go the wrong way, neither there, well, this option is still all right, but he lost in the final. we just

won’t go to any corporate party yet another round of sabotage of a legal democratic decision, and another 50 people leave the same chat with a scandal. remained in the chat, too, fifty with a democratic, winning option. you can go to a corporate party no, because these elections were held on the basis that we will drop 50 rubles each. a team of 150 people. and if there are three times fewer people left, then more money needs to be built from each, and on these conditions. another 30 people leave because financial issues are in the rules of elections instead of a corporate party. there are still 20 people who have not been identified in any way, who come to the conclusion that there is no sense in such a corporate party. so we disperse, no one went anywhere , democracy did not play. everyone just quarreled morality. our systems should be for us and for us they are approved by someone from behind a hillock, theoretically democracy. pretty good on its own. she is bad for the slavs. we need a king in the family in the enterprise in the country in head. we are slavs, that

death is good for us germans and vice versa, returning to the color system, in itself, autonomous theoretically not bad, but people rejected it. so we need to change the system to one that people will accept and we must be afraid that if we make a mistake, we must admit it. what we hide and see as a tail in front of society , i repeat once again my main requirement is a fair attitude and justice, especially when passing an exam and the most interesting thing. i remember when we held a meeting, but they asked if this system is needed. this is good. yes, everything is fine, it turns out that a lot of questions are not normal. but if there are questions, they must be removed, they must be resolved. and by the way, the president also shows how one should not be afraid of mistakes by personal example, and this was last week, when, in the heat of a difficult conversation on health care , the conversation turned to working off. graduates of medical universities

alexander lukashenko emotionally with all his heart wanting to make medicine better for the citizens of his country. he said the following, sort it out. who are you recruiting and no excuses, after unlearning that you have to work there for 5 years to get married. eh, it's not accepted anywhere else. so i'll work for you, we spend huge money on training swordsmen. there are no such costs in any area. and we are all freemen. once again, you need to take into account the context and logic of the president and feel the moment. it was a hot meeting with awards from the parties and debriefings, but many students and applicants tensed up, and then they also sketched out fakes with a hint of some kind of serfdom. and now a week later the president calmly explains everything, but i want to warn you on tv. people need to understand that they are being educated and

returning to specific jobs so accurately. where is their message from? i scared people there a little bit that i got married, out of something. uh, so we don't take into account. not married, you have to work, of course, we will approach humanly, but the target audience must clearly understand what they will have to do. i agree to work out the agreement, at least 5 years, the crown, as we see, did not fall from the president to reassure people, and this a wonderful example of the highest level to all officials, how to act when people are worried about your decision or your words. and this detail was the most important for me last week, there were other details, too, not the most let's say. so imperceptible, for example, in a conversation with the secretaries of the security councils of the csto countries, alexander grigorievich said the following: there, of course,

the results of contour 3 days are waiting for contrast. this is what we see and what i received the information of the president of russia completely coincides, see that both in ukraine and in the west the data lukashenko’s data match putin’s data, which is good, but this also suggests that their own special services and intelligence collect data for the presidents, that is, not only the long arm of the fsb gets the secrets of kiev and brussels from washington, but also the long arm of the kgb of belarus and we call to moscow to clarify their data for their work, but even from there they call us from the kremlin to find out what our intelligence was. so our help to an ally. i think more than what is said publicly. this is normal alexander lukashenko and vladimir putin met on friday in sochi outside formal setting. yes, there are economic issues, but not a problem, they are being resolved and i should note. i have always criticized, as you said, the government, but here they work

quite effectively, uh, there is room to move. most importantly, we know what to do and in which direction to move, thank god in general, i'm already afraid. as you said about it, answered, what are you saying, uh, we thought it would be worse, but so far a little better than we thought, and thank god, so slowly, we will rebuild our relationship and have already publicly said on uh, we have a meeting of secretaries with this security, that russia and i will think over a plan of action in this situation, hope that the sanctions will be lifted. and why should we even talk about it, we don’t need to focus on our strengths and on ourselves, and if we work out, such a plan of action is ours and our partners. be sure to connect. i am confident in kazakhstan yes, you are within the framework of the euro-western union and uzbekistan and we will create attractive conditions here. yes, i am sure

that our union within the framework of the eurasian economic union will only get stronger the quality of interaction with the structure of our economic relations are changing in the right direction. uh, first of all , today the emphasis is not only on the traditional areas of our cooperation, but also on you, these are the technological areas. well, from a security point of view. we'll talk about this separately now with your eyes on you. and now the public confirmation of the obvious, the most important thing is discussed by the leaders face to face, without television cameras and journalists. this is as obvious as the sun during the day, and the moon at night, but i, as a journalist, stiflingly used to pay attention to the wording, and this is the most loud with public words, that is the most sensitive issue. yes, everything is going according to plan on the 8th. as you know, on july 7 , the preparation of the relevant

facilities will immediately begin activities related to the deployment of the relevant channel on your territory, the main point of the tour putin to meet with lukashenka in sochi said the following quote. let's start the event related to the deployment of appropriate types of weapons on your territory from the context of the conversation, as if it automatically means that we are talking about tactical nuclear weapons, almost all the media immediately wrote about him, but putin does not speak directly about this neatly, choosing general language does not sound like tactical nuclear weapons or nuclear weapons, although the situation seems to favor it directly and say, and placement also falls under putin’s general wording belarus has non-nuclear weapons, for example, strategic and nuclear strategic.

so let's wait with the conclusions , the details affect them very much. my name is igor turov. it was my propaganda corrected race mlesse. by knives, quarrels take off. wash the creatures. yes, shrines emanate under

the sky, throwing a tire latitudes behind the fabric smile under the sun. you'll see, he himself and nick could not, but that gold sandy beer drank from them endlessly, throwing the tire of the lake. i am not towers. here, all the more, i just want from stress, so that i don’t experience the mountains, the sea, and the lake , here they are. don’t if, don’t forget, the heart loves. the boy ran through the neighboring village and told

them that the punishers were coming and all the trees were living, punitive operations and destruction of the belarusian people during the war years, we will show the written testimonies of witnesses and the stories of eyewitnesses of children, they left some building dark steel and on the floor, where on some executioners and starve each story this tragedy of a specific person who was taken away everything in the country of loved ones home and the right to life of parents. for facts and figures, see the documentary publicist cycle of genocide without the right to life on belarus 24 tv channel. oblivion

is the very first step towards distortion. everything will be sorted out by provocative details and answers to the challenges of the time, now in society there is a very strong demand for justice. no need to make excuses. do you know why? because when a person has learned the four basic rules of management, yes, then in general it does not matter what he manages. he just has to have his head on his shoulders serve in three structures. this is in the army in the church and all sorts, so i will say so not very far, but there is a concept, operational artificiality, theatrical art. how do you stand not to become an actor in someone else's game, the main conclusion is not you have to wait for the command. don't be afraid to take responsibility. i, probably, once again emphasize two things that they reproduced. i liked the decency and change of the markov project nothing personal only the truth,

which is always more interesting than conjectures, watch on belarus 24 tv channel. each of the heroes of the project is engaged in a very important matter from different places in the heart and trying to catch where this pulse goes in the wrong place, where the breakdown is in the wiring and we have to repair it, that is our job. this like an electrician by heart. we will introduce you to people who have found their calling as a doctor. it's a way of life. i'm all 25 years old. i want to go to work. i want to help athletes. there is awareness. in the scientific community, that the achievement of cardiology allows you to extend life by 10 years, we offer you to spend one day with specialists and learn all about the intricacies of their work now. our world is running on an anti-gravity track. c is equal to half his real weight. it allows

us, uh, to put the athlete on his feet literally 5 days after the operation, the atmosphere around watch yourself right for prolonging your life on tv channel belarus 24. culture and nation, why the city of ilya is called small jerusalem, and also the capital of the belarusian tatars is there a place in the modern world for national cultures or they are replaced by one global one, see the new issue of the fashion project on culture this weekend on tv channel belarus 24.

and the nuclear shield and the red lines are minsk’s reaction to possible aggression. a big interview of our president on russia 1 tv channel.