yuan for the united states of america is already too painful a blow. well, you correctly note that in reality, uh, the dominance of this hegemony of the united states of america is based on, uh, replicating conflicts, why is this done? hmm , first of all, this is done to demonstrate to global investors, global fund banks , which, in principle, need to be national, they do not belong to any state and the united states of america through a dispersion of these conflicts. they say invest only in us. we can safely generate surplus value. and the most important thing is to generate protection for your investments, but when there are such alternative centers of economic and technological growth as europe yes, as china naturally. uh, investors start, uh, pumping their capital? ah,

directly to these centers, the united states of america, the anglo-saxon world, london washington is starting already. and breathe nervously and understands that they enter into a mode of competition with them and in order to level them out this competition. naturally, it is necessary to plant a conflict in europe, as they implemented through their own, but theirs is the result of moscow’s correct actions in relation to the west in relation to their aggression, but the disagreement between europe and russia is an end in itself - this is precisely the inhibition of seating. uh, the european economy of european corporations in the interests of american corporations now. and if we are talking about china, the same thing they, uh, are trying to collectively west, and large uh, american anglo-saxon funds to do in relation to if china starts a conflict, for example, in

the asia-pacific region , not only draw taiwan into it, but first of all. uh, japan south korea in this case, where the money goes, they will all try to get out of this region, because there investments are dangerous for their savings. there are no dangerous returns. and where will they go? naturally they will, but returning to the united states of america and america will again feel great and the problem. debt goes in general, united states of america i mean, generally in the background dear guests. i would like us to pay attention to our map of china's isolation in the pacific. and if we carefully look at it, let's look at this line, and the flow of china from the oceans. and if the prc fleet begins to be based in taiwan, it will be able to cut american communications in the pacific ocean and attack even hawaii yes, there are such opinions, and the first line turns the fleet

of the people's republic of china into an inland sea fleet, like the russian fleet in the black and baltic seas and to exit v open sea to the chinese. we'll have to break through the areas shot through by land missiles, such data exist and such . in fact, certain warnings appear in the media, sergei feliksovich. how can you a comment on this information and such similar ones, and materials that well, see politics. uh, creating a belt of hostility around china and isolation. china at sea. it began long before today's events. this is under barack obama and when madame hillary clinton was secretary of state as once the maximum preached this one, and this situation is this is the middle of the tenths. but

that's exactly why the chairman of cdnp, a initiated this initiative, and the doctrines of the integration of one belt one way, to avoid this isolation at sea. most. the main thing with regard to the sea route, china now has cooperation with russia along the northern sea route, so the plan has already failed , you know, this is absolutely clear, but in addition to the sea route, there are several more land routes, which almost all go to the trans-siberian railway in its various parts. in particular, the northern routes, which used to be called the great tea road, goes to the trans-siberian in the baikal region, there are even more eastern ones, but also through kazakhstan, of course, they are also known, where in the south-south urals it also joins the trans-siberian. all these routes exist against , as you know, in general such an inn. the project that

well connects the east and west of the vast eurasian continent and nothing like this will be created in the near future. although we know china through pakistan, it is already entering the indian ocean. therefore , all these possibilities are this option it will not work, for the sake of this it is not worth starting a third world war. thanks a lot, other than that. i would like to note that the white house began to shift its attention to southeast asia even under the administration of barack obama, and this trend was called the pacific and at that time the united states of america acted more through economic mechanisms by launching the trans -pacific partnership project, but when donald trump's white house washington has withdrawn from the agreement. you understand that another strong player china has appeared in the region, which will only interfere with it by increasing anti-chinese rhetoric. i include a discussion of

a possible invasion of taiwan a. also, taking into account the independent policy of the kntera, the stableman began the gradual militarization of the region. although the american military presence remained there for decades, but in volumes that today are clearly not satisfied with washington india pakistan vietnam thailand and many other countries the asia-pacific region has long been of genuine interest from the united states . in recent years, washington has begun actively recruiting these states into a new military-political alliance directed against russia and china, which the prc has already nicknamed asian. at that. china - this is the biggest strategic challenge facing washington. we must maintain leadership in the international arena . for the united states , maritime communications between asia and europe are also of strategic importance . control. above them gives the americans, almost complete control over the entire region, because thanks to the sea.

states can manage communications with their asian allies, for example, by supplying them with resources or blocking critical oil and gas supplies for them, on which the economic development of the entire region depends . the united states and india, but the main narrative of such cooperation. the need to protect democracy and order based, on rules that naturally imply washington's interests india and the us are indispensable partners. i am confident that in the years to come our two democracies will continue to defend, instead of defending, the rule-based order of ownership to the strengthening of the world. the prosperity and security of our citizens ensures the freedom and openness of these oceanic regions, as well as jointly responding to the challenge that we face around the world washington is also actively expanding its military presence in the philippines south korea japan countries. and now the united states is literally helping

to make military-technological expansion in the region, and according to experts, this is just the beginning. today we have the opportunity to talk with international journalist sergei leonidovich agafonov sergei leonidovich hello, i welcome you to our studio. good afternoon. hi all. thanks a lot for the invitation. well , we are discussing taiwan and you know the recent actions of the united states of america indicate that washington intends to do everything possible so that taiwan does not go along the hong kong path did not become part of the economic and technological system. and so the americans talk a lot about the fact that they will not allow the military absorption of the island, but at the same time they make it clear that there can be no talk of a peaceful way either. do you agree that, as with ukraine, where pro-russian political forces were suppressed, in the case of taiwan, the prc wants to leave the choice of war or renunciation of

the island, although today we see, after all, a fairly peaceful position of the people's republic of china in relations. well, look and i agree that, uh, the americans want to do this as the absolute of everything. in fact, the point is that it is in the constructions that you have just outlined. eh, really americans. it is seen as such, but there is one big flaw that changes the whole picture, and the excuse is that in part of taiwan, the americans see it as a kind of object. uh, to be dealt with like this, uh, anyway, uh, and the strategic position of the island is taken into account. there is a military potential, all other delights, but what is actually happening in taiwan itself is absolutely not taken into account

. by nature, and that he can introduce some adjustments with his independent actions that will break the hell out of all this beautiful construction that the americans have. uh, they drew uh from this point of view. you ask about whether it is possible to draw an analogy with ukraine i think no it is impossible, because the americans would like to make ukraine double two, but this is absolutely impossible given the realities that exist in taiwan, its relationship with the mainland, in principle, the history of development. e of this island and the people who live there. this is a completely separate thing, completely unrelated to the american plans to somehow arrange the situation in east asia . and it seems to me that all the talk and the whole wave

that is going on about a possible chinese invasion of taiwan is all american fools in order to heat up the atmosphere mmm there won't be a serious conflict there , it won't be needed, nor is china the most important one, taiwan doesn't need it and, uh, the most striking example of the fact that this is the case. uh, elections can serve. uh, the local ones that took place at the end of last year on the island where the ruling party, uh, democracy, which in general profess some kind of separatist approach, suffered a decisive defeat. that is , the voter, despite everything, for all the heat, uh, from this rhetoric, despite the visiting encycloses that put the region on the brink serious conflict. voter. the taiwanese said their word in the conflict, the taiwanese are not interested. well, how to plunge into this unintentional separatist whirlpool, and uh, this

certainly needs to be borne in mind. please stay with us alexei do you agree with the opinion of a respected expert? because we understand that provocations, the purpose of which is hostility, are to ignite this war. of course, the same united states has it clear that it was right very clearly, it is noted that the anglo-saxon americans have their own plans, and the chinese have their own plans. yes, and uh, china beijing has officially made it very clear that taiwanese issues are a private matter of the chinese people, and they themselves will decide between uh, uh with mainland china and uh, china, as they say, taiwanese, therefore. uh, as soon as and including, they kind of emphasize, as soon as any external forces try, uh, to rock the situation by planting some kind of separatist ideas, and

china, uh, is ready to apply, including, well, they are veiled to say this, but some form. strength to fight off desire the same anglo-saxons to interfere in this process. but how likely is it that in the event of a conflict over taiwan, japan, south korea, australia and the philippines will also participate in the war on the side of the united states, it seems that the japanese elite believes that a conflict is better than an intensified after the absorption of the island, china although based on your answers. i understand that you are not at all a supporter of the fact that certain military actions in this region are possible, in principle. look, i do not believe that the conflict will be initiated by the taiwanese. uh, and what will force the armed answers china since i believe that the americans

are able to learn some kind of provocation, because they are now in a rather difficult situation and m. a. you know how strangulation techniques exist in judo wrestling in eastern jiu-jitsu. now they are in a situation where they don’t have time, and the development of the situation, they are being choked by economic suffocation. uh, geopolitical , and so on, and in order to break out of this capture of the objective, which happened , uh, as it developed. uh, economic and historical. them. need to take some actions to loosen this grip. ah. will the countries you listed participate in this, none of these countries? uh independent military action i am convinced of this. eh, this can be proved, well , it will take quite a long time for them to list all the circumstances on their own, they will not do anything. uh, what can happen, uh, and in south

korea and in japan and in the philippines , especially recently, there is an american so-called talent base, and in that these countries can indirectly accept. uh, participation in some kind of hypothetical conflict, since some kind of regrouping or possible regroupings will be carried out from these bases. uh, strikes by acting forces cannot be ruled out. but there is also no doubt that all of your countries listed will be categorically opposed to this. japan will increase its own military potential. korea will build up its own military capability the philippines will try somehow. to settle down, but to take part openly in a certain coalition on side of the us presenting its strange peoples and territories under the inevitable retaliation. e. i don't think it will happen. thank you

very much. thank you for your opinion.