for you around the clock, do not switch. our daily task is to tell about belarus in the country and abroad more than 100 million viewers around the world have access to viewing the projects of our tv channel, belarus

generous picturesque and monumental sports and team we tell you not only about significant events , we introduce you inspiring people who live in belarus and do everything for its

development, belarus can be different to understand and feel. she needs to be seen with my own eyes. my name is igor tur. this is my propaganda let's start eating. you know such weeks in the presidential schedule, when alexander lukashenko personally said, so much about important and different things that it’s not even necessary to add something special, or even superfluous and that’s exactly what the past week was like on tuesday, the head of state studied the work of one of the enterprises military industrial

complex. and then i talked with journalists and with my own people and with representatives of the russian tv channel and somehow, against the background of the loudness of statements in these interviews left aside the topic of the president's trip. and this is precisely the production of ammunition and, first of all, a rocket, the most common caliber in the world at a secret facility , of which there are many enterprises in belarus responsible, including for the production of belarusian rso , the polonaise visited and i let's like this , 90 percent of what was reported the head of state from specialists responsible for the defense industry is, if not top secret, then certainly for official use i am talking about this, including how a man whose military registration specialty implies an understanding of all the vultures of secrecy, therefore, talking about this visit. i will follow the logic. well, the logic cannot be secret, for which we are more closely engaged in the production of our own

ammunition. there are several reasons for the first fighting. in ukraine, they very noticeably showed that it is much more important than what they shoot with what they shoot with? if suddenly one of the viewers missed these showdowns, then enter in the youtube search box where the ammunition is and look. i'm in in general, i love the theme of weapons, and everything connected with this, including films, was such a good movie the lord of war with nicolas cage in the title role, where, among other things , artistically, but very far from the truth , it was told how tons of weapons were stolen and sold in ukraine , which she inherited after the collapse of the ussr, and among other things, in this not the worst film , the phrase sounded, if arms dealers fight ammunition, it never ends, it sounds pathetic, but the essence is conveyed correctly by the winner in any protracted conflict with a high share probability will be the one who does not have the most advanced weapons. not the most powerful, not the most fashionable. and the one who can ensure the uninterrupted and excessive supply of shells to the front is primitive and

belarus is engaged in the decision of the commander in chief. we have. what to shoot this. we have plenty. yes, a lot of advice. heritage but redesigned for modernity. it turns out that this is very necessary in the army of missiles , missiles, high-precision weapons, helicopters, leopards, bradley, which are destroyed in the same way as soviet tanks and infantry fighting vehicles, we saw it recently as a result of the first phase of the counter offensive. and as it turned out, our barriers are already a new modernized tornado and so on, they turn out to be very necessary and solve big problems, it’s necessary, but without this there will be no victory at the front and instead of investing billions of dollars in the development of something supersonic or beyond the far. we are investing millions in the production of ammunition, so that in which case we do not depend on anyone in the world at all. if suddenly the kiev regime decides to merge the collective

west, for this they will not need anything to even ask for the return of all the delivered tanks, planes and the platoon, too, you won’t need to just stop supplying shells to kiev, because without shells, all this is fashionable and expensive, but rudely useless metal, the second reason why belarus is intensively engaged in ammunition. and this is obvious, because russia needs ammunition for logic. it strongly hints to me that the large volumes of our rockets, which were shown to the commander-in-chief last week, yes, will go into service with the russian army. i am in general i support the thesis there is no war, and as has been said more than once by all sensible people in belarus, we are in general. what we certainly do not want is that against us for us near us far from us there was some kind of war going on. but there is a nuance to this world has never been and never will be, therefore, all the pacifists, who can say? ay-ay-ay, we produce ammunition that kills people in ukraine , i will answer the following

, as a citizen of belarus, i would prefer that we produce shells for russia and that russia has little victory in ukraine over the coalition of the west, instead of the collective west producing shells for the armed forces, so that this externally controlled army continues to aggress towards russia and towards us last week. it is known that in may, a drone from the territory of ukraine with explosives tried to break into the rear of our country in order to blow something up. naturally with deaths in my native belarus and yes , i want us to produce so much ammunition. how much does russia need in order for those positions, those weapons and those people who are trying to bring death to my country to be destroyed strikes from belarusian shells and the logic of such ardent pacifists always leads to a dead end, we also produce shells. but where you don't put them is supplies to strike at someone, right, so now abandon the defense complex. let's move on to production. we are

yogurt in belarus and export it somewhere. it can be bought and eaten by a russian general, who will then give the order to the zas. what missiles in ukraine can be eaten by the ukrainian general, who will decide on sabotage with deaths in the belgorod region in the bryansk or in moscow it may be eaten by some polish politician who decides to deploy nato troops in the country for aggression to the east. it can be eaten by a european mp who votes for sanctions against russia and the supply of weapons to kiev let's expand the geographic area if you like, someone in china can eat our yogurt for breakfast and can start a military operation against taiwan somewhere in africa, two generals can eat our yogurt and start a civil war in the united states , a democrat or a republican can eat our yogurt and authorize the destruction of an entire countries. are these cases proof that yogurt producers in belarus are involved in aggression, military strikes and deaths, of course not, this is nonsense, the same is true with

regards to shells. we produce them for ourselves in order to protect our territory, and we also produce them for because, firstly , we support the goals and objectives of their own, and, secondly, for the use of shells purchased from us. we are not legally related. so the pacifists don't need to groan and sigh and thirdly. yes, we manufacture shells, as well as weapons and equipment in order to export and earn money here, i will give as an example another film based on the iron man comics, where weapons manufacturer tony stark answers one of the journalists on charges of trafficking in death. so tony stark asks the journalist, what do you think the latest medical technologies or special cereals are being developed for, which will end hunger, all this is paid for in arms sales, the world is far from perfect, but we need to live in it, however, we need to understand and to accept the reality of our world, the journalist in the film managed to convince tony stark. i hope

our viewers will also agree. and for those who are an ardent pacifist and who are not in the war, i will surprise you with part of your salary - this is the profit from the export of belarusian weapons. regardless of where you work. now with regards to the president's interview and the question. why do we need nuclear weapons alexander grigoryevich answered as detailed as possible once again, it's not a matter of russia. at first i asked putin then i strongly on friendly terms. demanded requested demanded give me back this until the weapon is enough for me. well, why do i need the same strategic poplars. although we are now preparing sites for these weapons. they are all alive and well, except for one, but this is an intercontinental missile. am i going to fight with america , no, so for now this weapon is enough for me. to be blunt, but that was my

request. this is not russia imposed on me. why because a nuclear power. as you all say, no one else in the world has fought, and i don't want to be at war with us. there is a threat there is such a thing. i must prevent this threat. i think a few days will pass. to have what we asked for and even a little more application of the only reasons for one aggression against our belarus and this will be the solution for an immediate response. i have already said this several times before, there will be an immediate answer. let's talk about the lack of hesitation. if necessary, in more detail, because the political will of the leader of the country is also a weapon that protects the state from external aggression. let's simulate the situation troops. nato enters the territory of a country in order to sweep away power and replace

it with a convenient one, and only a nuclear strike in the rear will stop them. let's take the cis countries. which of the leaders is capable of making such a decision without hesitation now without offense. this is the author's program by the private opinion of a journalist. let's go azerbaijan aliyev for sure. maybe armenia nikol pashinyan can’t, moreover, doesn’t have fullness for this, belarus alexander lukashenko can definitely have powers, kazakhstan is such a slanting zhomart. can't want more its theoretical decision will be challenged by other political forces of astana kyrgyzstan cannot be friends with friends moldova in moldova there is no power, as such, to make such decisions in moldova in principle, there is no one russia vladimir putin can and is ready for sure, but the kremlin has a lot of towers tajikistan emomali rahmon as for me maybe turkmenistan berdmukhamedov more likely than not uzbek mirziyoyev, more likely ukraine, which is still in the cis, vladimir zelensky , can fulfill an external order, take europe

and emmanuel macron. rishi sunak, olafshorles and other democratic citizens are unable to make such unilateral decisions. but there is poland in which there is a nominal president in the person of andrzej duda, who can fulfill the order and implement the decision of the real leader of poland, yaroslav kaczynski, who has the will to make such a decision. on the issue of nuclear weapons, one should pay attention only to what the leaders of countries say and do, which have the political will, tools for making a decision - use this weapon and that’s it. the cries of the west, as well as the displeasure of some, who in the east are completely irrelevant. our defense is a complex consisting of nuclear weapons and a commander-in-chief with a will. toolkit to apply it separately, the elements of this complex do not give us complete protection, therefore, our red lines. they are really red. here is the red line, the very concept

has discredited itself, and yet. now, if you would formulate a red line for yourself that, olya, you are very hard at work , you can never talk about red lines and their draw, because life changes, lilies move, then we called them back and forth specifically. well, not us anymore. well, what now? you are right sometimes you ask a question there, i see, well, here they are lines and have already passed, what's next, that you drew somewhere mystery new line. that is, if you say that there is a red line, we always have them, and they already have russians, and ukrainians have them, but politically it is better not to voice them. what kind of life they are - it changes this happened in the russian federation, but you already named them zero. the truth is that he called the red lines and did not say that if you cross this line, it will be this, you will cross tactical

cores, this is strategic. they didn’t say this, thank god, therefore, it’s never necessary, but red lines intermeddle in these details. for me, this is full-blown aggression with love from the outside. now, from alexander grigorievich’s most interesting thing, russian journalists were interested in how he relates to zelensky , who is called volodya, but whom he called not only that, let’s start with let's hear the president's answer. you said so volodya zelensky zelensky he is now volodya or i will quote yours, nit. i'm already with him and not with nits. and i don't talk to bastards anymore, so i don't even know how, but i don't have some kind of spiteful one for him, you know, if in his place, excuse me, putin was. i would be angry with him, because a man understands what he is doing. oh, he knows what war is. he is a military man. well, volodya zelensky, he is not

an expert, but then, if you are harnessed to this cart, my dear, so you already answer. so he doesn't understand. uh. himself that he creates somewhere a year ago. i said publicly, the next i assume that mr. zelensky went into politics with a sincere desire to do something good for his country. and i admit that even now zelensky believes that he is doing something good for his ukraine after this phrase. i received a flurry of negativity in private messages. i was accused, almost of secret support and betrayal, but i remain unconvinced. my main claim to zelensky is that he got there, where he didn’t pull and doesn’t pull, being a good humorist and artist, but a completely stupid president and especially the commander in chief, moreover, in my subjective opinion. mr. zelinsky is completely devoid of a strategic mind, because it may seem noble to fight tactically with everyone and everyone for ukraine to be somehow

noble, but no one will need ukraine in which there will be no ukrainians. and even if ukraine remains, then it is without ukrainians. anything but ukraine, alexander grigorievich in his hearts called zelensky a nit, although i have reason to believe that alexandra grigorievich considers those who chose zelensky and helped him get the presidency to be nits, but here i recommend revisiting the series servant of the people, especially the first season, when zelensky will die, he will think that dies a hero of ukraine despite all the stupidity of such thoughts and despite the fact that time will put everything in its place and zelensky’s personality in the history of ukraine will be revised from heroic to us prosaic, because then when necessary was to take a step back, saving the lives of his citizens and his country, zelensky was told to take a step to the side, and he did it, not being able to do otherwise, and then he believed in his role and that it was

the right way to negotiate. well , the americans seemed to know well. some went. no, they offer us. come on next time in istanbul, fuck you. what is istanbul , what is it, we will go to istanbul, we will border with you here, i will make a remark, because three people last week told me about it turns out that alexander grigorievich taught vladimir vladimirovich to swear. and rightly so, because we have more such weapons than strange ones so closer to the people. they know about it and all the time they are pushing us to start negotiations to reduce the horseradish. you understand how she seems to speak with us. another thing that is interesting in general is how russia accepts the experience of belarus in various fields, which has been criticized. here we are for working with the opposition in the twentieth, and then we saw the same thing in the east with an emphasis on our agriculture, someone also laughed there, but already in sochi, i say goodbye to putina tells

lukashenka about the harvest in the south of russia, or here we have what is called targeted training of students. and last week , putin instructed his government to prepare a proposal for the development of such a tool as a student agreement. i will quote vladimir vladimirovich. the point is that the employer, at his own expense , sends employees to learn to improve their skills, and the employee receives a guarantee of employment. here is how, for me, the student agreement in russia will be adapted belarusian agreement on targeted training. so, when one of the moscow liberals talks about billions of dollars of support for belarus, it would be worth considering that we also supply the kremlin with the most valuable experience, which is generally priceless, especially since alexander lukashenko is officially the most experienced leader of the country of the former ussr who last week, he also held a meeting on

work with personnel, where he said that formalism from officials is already common, we see many, not isolated cases. you, as for me , are a substantive hint of a paradigm shift for all in public administration, despite the fact that our well-deserved experienced man defended the country in the twentieth and everything else. if there is no result, then it is necessary to decide whether they should be given, the second, fifth and tenth chances tell me that he does not pull the chairman of the executive committee, he does not hold out. here's a little reprimand declared re-education. listen, what are you guys? who are you re-educating? he is already under 50 for 40 , you want to re-educate him, if he did not give the result, what do you expect from him? what will happen next? what is worse for alexander lukashenko abandoned the idea of ​​delegating authority along with responsibility on the ground, rather, on the ground , they were not ready for this. and that's what the president i'm sure will decide. my name is igor tura.

it was my propaganda the healing power of prayer and the help of god 's word, when we dedicate churches, we can quietly stop near the icon of the savior of the mother of god of our heavenly patron and turn to him with our prayer in silence, unusual architectural solutions and devices of the temple. these are small crosses in the vaults of this temple. and they are intended to amplify the sound, what is most interesting, uh, the golosnyaks are such silent witnesses that the temple was not rebuilt spiritual instruction, and with eternal values ​​we will learn to overcome our infirmities and weaknesses to overcome difficulties. and some other very

important words. i want the children to always remember and always at every training session. we repeat with them. god is not in power, but in truth there are interesting facts, and from historians and art historians, of course, the icons were golden. yes, this gold leaf could have been used gold leaf. well no we won't be here to say, just coloring. these are the real golden backgrounds, which perfectly harmonize with color and create such very bright major works. watch spiritually, educational projects on belarus 24 tv channel. welcome to the project of the most daring sportsmen and the smartest, which in biathlon slang means a shot in milk andrey the first miss. that's right. this means a miss our participants know exactly what victory is. how often is the european football championship held?

kirill once every 4 years once every 4 years absolutely correct according to the rules of the project. they must go through four periods of the game. answering questions from the world of sports, we can play a game with you, who is cooler, or the game heroes of sports. let's choose a hero from the sport, as the abbreviation of andrey's bfl stands for athletics federation. what country does the midfielder anhelmonia represent argentina argentina watch an intellectual sports show and heading on belarus 24 tv channel . declared when these places. these are those that, in

comparison with which ivan thunderstorms, are simply seasoned with belarusian folklore legends of tribute, of course, even the old mill. and gennady kononov is a man who certainly believes in belarusian tourism. it develops and builds grandiose plans for the future according to one of the versions. i was the first to restore belarusian. uh, such an active tourism. watch on friday on our channel an energy vampire, but uh, without the desire to harm anyone or from someone. i am different fueled.

open news on belarus 1 with you tatiana king. hello, let's talk about the main thing by this hour, and tomorrow the war began on the eve of the day of all people's memory, the victims of the great patriotic war and the belarusian genocide on