32 gross violation by the lithuanian side of the requirements of international law by the unjustified use of special means against refugees by physical force, and the facts of not intentionally not providing intentional not providing medical assistance. what led, including to the death of people? lithuania itself is busy with other things. vilnius intends to transfer to ukraine two nasan missile systems purchased specifically for this purpose, as the president of lithuania said, the installation will go to ukraine soon . it is known that he arrived in kyiv to discuss the upcoming nato summit to be held in vilnius in july, it is expected that representatives of ukraine will be present in the council that will be held on the sidelines of the event , kiev did not receive an invitation to participate in the summit itself. italy's prime minister calls china a systemic adversary of europe. careless remarks by georgia meloni made on the eve of a meeting with french president matron, the prime minister

said the countries of the european union. must reduce their economic dependence on the middle kingdom because. china their systemic adversary rather strange statement takes into account trade relations. so with beijing, according to customs statistics, china's trade with the european union and the united states in 22 amounted to 1.3 trillion dollars, which is 8 times more than with russia . including the attorney general of the country during landing, the aircraft did not have a front landing gear, therefore a business jet. just pecked at the runway, no one was hurt. hare-court emergency landing

also made a passenger plane in the philippines the pilot informed the dispatchers, and they had difficulties due to a technical failure and landed at the airport of the city of laak instead of the destination in vietnam among more than 200 passengers and crew members , the cause of the technical problem was not found out. new information from my colleagues at 15:00 on our air all the best. hello, on the air, the program sas is authorized to announce i am the host nadezhda sas greetings. this program is for those who want to better understand what is happening and understand how these processes, events, people

will affect the life of each of the life of the country, and the main events of world politics this week. let's tell. to you right now the son of us president hunter biden. he pleaded guilty to tax evasion and made a deal with the investigation on the issue of illegal possession of weapons. this follows from the documents of the us attorney's office while investigating other possible offenses. hunter biden. continues at the white house. while breathing a sigh of relief. indeed, on these points. prosecutors agreed to bring biden jr. conditional term. this categorically does not suit the republicans, who believe that hunterbaideno got off lightly solely because of his relationship with the president. at the same time, the us president himself managed to sharply spoil relations with the chinese president last week. xi jinping was dismayed when the us spotted chinese balloons over its airspace and beat them up because they didn't know about the mission, us

president joe biden said at a campaign fundraiser in california it is a great shame for dictators when they do not know what happened, added biden, an hour later, a sharp response from the chinese foreign ministry appeared, the statement of the american side is extremely absurd and irresponsible. they seriously contradict the basic facts , violate diplomatic protocols and infringe on china's political dignity , the chinese foreign ministry said. all this happened literally a day after secretary of state anthony blinkin returned from beijing, who allegedly tried to ease tensions between the united states and china. as part of a €100 million cost-cutting program, german media concern axel springer plans to lay off several hundred employees of its bilda publication and replace them with artificial intelligence. we received a notification from management. concern some employees of the group issued documents, in

particular reads. unfortunately, we will have to part ways with colleagues whose tasks in the digital world are carried out by artificial intelligence and or automated processes will no longer be editorial directors employees of printing production proofreaders, secretaries and photo editors. what they are today in such a way that artificial intelligence technologies are radically changing the labor market, even in such creative professions as journalism. and today's program i will start with a quote from the great science fiction writer and popularizer of science, a native of the town of petrovich on the border of russia and belarus, isaac asimov, a robot cannot harm a person, unless he proves that in the end it will be useful for all mankind. agree what a tricky and complicated rule and it's more about us humans than fragrances. and today we will be engaged in the popularization of science. we need to try to put complex things in simple

terms so that our viewers understand and appreciate the dangers and opportunities for the development of artificial intelligence technologies and help me in this will be deeply knowledgeable experts on the topic. igor ozersky lawyer, science fiction writer , board member of the russian union of industrialists and entrepreneurs. hello hello hope thank you my colleague gleb lavrov journalist, international affairs political observer cjsc second national tv channel. hello hello our discussion we start with a blitz question of the advent of the era of artificial intelligence. it's already impossible to stop gleb as you think, with your permission, not being a technical specialist in any way, but i still want to say that artificial intelligence is something that does not exist yet. not yet, but at the moment in which we all now live, and programs are developing

, special tools are being developed that already exist and which are already changing our world and here are the presence of these tools, and the strengthening of their influence on the social political economic military side of our life cannot be stopped. and it's very big for all of us. humans as representatives of the biological species homo sapiens is a big challenge. igor do you agree with gleb's position? of course, i absolutely agree that technical progress, fortunately or , unfortunately, can be stopped, of course, perhaps, it seems to me, and here is a very interesting point. for me as for lawyer is that we see that society and technology are developing faster than the law and the biggest danger is how fast the legal community, including legal doctrine, can keep up with this new era, well, let's go before, how

to start our full-fledged discussion, let's define what is artificial intelligence, artificial intelligence. it is a set of software algorithms that allow a computer or computer-controlled robot to simulate a range of functional capabilities of the human brain and perform tasks normally associated. with human activity, as a rule, artificial intelligence algorithms use several technologies that allow machines to sense, understand, plan to act and learn in a similar way as people do. tell me, i roughly understand your position on this issue, but if we talk about artificial intelligence in the format in the form that we have at the moment. it is still a threat or an opportunity for the future of humanity for the future of humanity. this a threat even by the definition that is given here, and i would just add here, artificial intelligence, real big

artificial intelligence. he will set strategic goals for himself. it says tactics tactics now, even programs that exist today can determine for themselves. they do not yet determine strategically not to set strategic goals for themselves. so here is the challenge now. available it allows uh when working with artificial intelligence in the form in which it is today there are special programs for by and large, so, he allows those people who work with him to get such a serious competitive advantage that it’s impossible not to work with him ; moreover, a person will need to adapt to these programs, to these software products, to these technical capabilities, because otherwise it will not compete in the basic configuration. let's pay attention to the topic of thoughts that

are present in the minds of famous people with regards to artificial intelligence. perhaps you agree with some of them gleb please artificial intelligence. that case when it is necessary to be far-sighted enough in questions of regulation. otherwise , it may be too late. the artificial intelligence of computers will overtake human intelligence in the next 100 years. and when this happens, you need to make sure that the goals of the computer and the person will coincide, they will run counter to each other. the tools of control with the help of artificial intelligence give an inherent advantage to the totalitarian regime over open societies. igor with whom do you agree. whose opinion is closer to you on this issue? when answering this question, you need to pay attention to the fact that elon musk and stephen hawking are musk's promoters, in principle, a showman. and stephen hawking is a very famous popular physicist. and uh, anyway. here

are the quotes. they are more for show than uh, applicable in real life, when uh, so, uh, there was a very famous story with the company open ai, which invented gpt, then elon musk was its original investor. recently now with this yes petition, let's put it on hold, but uh like uh, well, it seems to me that now everyone can see this happened due to the fact that microsoft left the development, and bill gates wrote. uh, a scientific article is not very large. well, or even such a simple article, and where a bill gates expresses the opinion that, in fact, the age of artificial intelligence, this article is called. and this is a new stage of hmm humanity, which he compares with the advent of silicon silicon microprocessors and the advent of the graphical interface, which became a continuation of windows , and now, considering this whole situation with artificial intelligence in its entirety, then i absolutely agree with my colleague that those

programs that are now called artificial intelligence. neural networks. this is a program that has two parameters - adaptability and independence, but they are designed to solve only one specific problem. and there is such a thing as general artificial intelligence. he still remains within the framework of science fiction and a. i think that at the moment they are not afraid of artificial intelligence in the sense that it is now about those technologies, that accompany artificial intelligence, the so-called quantum computers, which stephen hawking just wrote about and the whole quantum race is now taking place in the world. and this quantum race can lead to the fact that those neural networks that exist now are just in general, artificial intelligence. and here itself is a threat that everyone says, it lies in some distant future quote by elon musk the issue of regulation a person may cease to have control. yes, over general artificial intelligence. gleb i would like so that we give our viewers the opportunity to hear another definition.

who are the ludites, these are the participants in the spontaneous protests of the first quarter of the 19th century against the introduction of machines during the industrial revolution in england, and from the point of view of the ludites, the machines were removed from the production of people, which led to technological unemployment. often the protest was expressed in pogroms and the destruction of machines and equipment. the modern new ludit is a person who uses a push-button phone instead of an iphone, subscribes to magazines instead of view them on your tablet and much more. gleb, you put yourself there, reckon, yes, and i do not hide my push-button telephone. i subscribe. moreover, i read books. well, unlike the fact that i get information at work. naturally through the screen, but i read books on paper and i think that e here i am close to umberta, eco, who spoke. yes, i'm a medieval type, i count books in paper. this is the middle ages you have books. these are texts on the screen, but if you are in

the future, but if the electricity suddenly disappears for a second, you will find yourself in stone age, and i'll still be in the middle ages therefore, yes here, but jokes are jokes. eh, nonetheless. yes, i'm a new ludit by definition, however. i'm not going to smash, of course, eh! some production, but on the other hand, if you pay attention even to the definition of buddhism. it was the emergence of machines that led to the industrial revolution to the emergence of new classes of class struggle. as such, and imagine the appearance of new types of machines alone, transformed the world led to numerous revolutions led to the confrontation of systems. this is the transition level from neanderthals to khomus a possibility. yes , they were close in biology, the only question is with us, the only question is that we knew how

to use it, we used it and adapted it much faster than they did not know how. here, just the same , a technological tool appears with software that makes people. which they possess are not just more effective, but the next step in development. this is not an additional opportunity, it is an opportunity without which the only question is that i, as a representative of homosapians, am not happy. the neanderthals were not very happy, probably with the appearance of homo sapience. so , in the same way, i am not happy about the fact that the fact that the next generation is the edge of my civilization, the edge of my era, is already visually visible. what specific time period are you talking about? you are now, when you have to be afraid already at all. well, uh, i'm more of a pessimist. i'm talking

about two generations, as we see from the soros quote, and how do we actually see from the development of uh? to date, already existing companies, we are talking about the fact that the palantir used, and its software programs work with large human resources management. yes, to work with the prediction of the action of large human communities. it has already been used right now right in the ukrainian conflict. and after that i sold my programs to the uk department of defense . well, we always come up with something new when we do. we first this business. we are trying to turn a prodigy. this, of course, is now in very simple language and sounds rather shockingly frightening, but nonetheless. now, if you can o, uh, your direction in the field of activity in area of ​​law japan for training

artificial intelligence cancels, as far as i understand or has already canceled, and copyright . imagine this is what the hefty body of legal knowledge and, most importantly , the hefty body of economic knowledge is based on right now. mutually, uh, the influence yes of different systems, someone has one and so on to speak today. everything leaves a piece, informational exclusivity, in principle, because it is necessary for training artificial intelligence, if we are talking about the next stage. dear comrades who they look at us, and in 15-20 years you will need to get a job in a reputable international office. or maybe earlier you will have to provide all the most explicit photos of yourself, open

your social networks in the personnel department, just to show what risks your hire may face, because he will face them anyway, because the hardware capabilities will still be strong enough to control each person directly there is a reverse situation precisely thanks to modern technological capabilities are now taking place on your favorite fad , the information space is being optimized. and as far as i understand, it has already been said that new programs should become personal. that is, each of us will have our own little chad gt attached to our record. yes, to our ip , perhaps, perhaps even more personal, so this is the optimization of the information space. this means that we will never be able to, and go to the search engine.

try to find something new and to believe that this search is really random so that google doesn’t go far in them when, uh, the question became whether bidens are attracted for corruption or not attracted to buy for corruption little internal american issue pre-election all that, but the americans are faced with because people with a republican point of view saw the news. oh, the democrats did not see her, that is, they are special. it was necessary to look for it, please give you the floor, but if we talk about fears, then, probably, you should be afraid right now and i can prove it. the fact is that we didn’t know about the gps chat until quite recently and it happened instantly, that is, there are a number of some developments that are going on, we don’t know anything about them, they are classified somewhere within the walled large corporations, and then it is issued as ready the product is ready

to use. now, since we remembered the gtp chat, let's display the graphics, the use of artificial intelligence in creativity , let's call it that, if we are talking about intellectual property protection, then in general, this is a very interesting question, how related to the work of artificial intelligence. and there is such a thing as the results of intellectual activity, and in the law, in the legislation. this is understood as a product of the activity of the human brain and now there are many legal incidents , for example, and the program of the ministry of foreign affairs journey e creates an image and who will own the copyright to this image, there are several points of view on this matter, while there are no right answers at the moment . although by the way, questions have been such for quite a long time stand the first point of view that the copyright will belong to the neural network itself and it seems that this can be funny, since artificial intelligence.

in theory, it cannot have the right to be subject, if you come to the russian language, then the right to be subject is to be, the subject of the bearer of these rights, but at the same time, in the european union, a normative act was adopted that calls into question the possibility of vesting such a right , but limited neural network second option. e that the object of copyright is the subject of copyright the author of the program has an interesting jurisprudence on this score, it means there were two cases, well, in china, another in australia which means a case. e, both are connected with the fact that there was a neural network that had a developer, but then the user created some object through this neural network as a result of intellectual activity. in the first case , a magazine was made for television, o, which was then used, respectively, this is the station and, uh, the copyright holders. uh, even how they would consider themselves copyright holders developers, not russia, they presented these from the company, which means

they created this product at the expense of their neural network and say it is ours. you have to pay us for this. it was a process in china and a similar process was in australia and two courts issued two diametrically opposed decisions. and the court in china took the side of the developers of the neural network and said that as well as, in fact. this is a product, a program, about which the developers are the owners, then they yes, the australian court said that since the user also invested some well, he made his contribution, yes, and yet it was through him. well, creativity. yes, let's say some use of the program was made, then the claim was denied and here uh, these are just a few points of view the following here is the point of view that the user can be, but if we look, let's assume the fourth part of the civil code on russian legislation , then it cannot be said that in our legislation the idea appears that only through the creative labor

of mental labor can results remain intellectual activity. if we , as it were, loaded the data into the program, it gave the result, then this is not an object of copyright and hence the fourth position arises, in my opinion, the most, controversial e. the fact that hmm the results of intellectual activity created by the neural network are in the public domain. by the way, this is very important. it seems to me that this is what humanity should be allowed to do. well , artificial intelligence is different from the human one, it does not get tired, it is not influenced by emotions, it is able to process huge arrays of information in a short time, it is these advantages that make artificial intelligence solutions effective in a number of industries. in what lives the skillful intellect showed itself best and why igor addresses this question to you as a person who is interested, who can already be called an expert in this field. you know, we have a lot of leaders among our clients. e of the russian market, which

earn artificial intelligence products. and this is the question he and you are most on the agenda. and, probably, most of all, people in general are worried that artificial intelligence will replace, so to speak, the jobs that exist, but here the first thing is, uh, a retrospective analysis of the situation, there were no cars at one time. everyone rode horses and there were a huge number of professions related to horses. then, when cars appeared , all these professions. it did not, but a huge number of other professions appeared. recently we are with you. well, we watched how such professions as bloggers as coaches appeared, er, which also they didn’t know before and dell conducted a study and in this conclusion appears the idea that in just a few years there will be almost 80 number of professions that we don’t even think about now. and about what professions are already replacing e, not these neural networks. and firstly, these are those professions that, well, do not require , probably, some kind of deep human thinking

, that is, routine work, for example, bank employees who conduct, a analytics on the possibility of issuing a loan. and here there is a human factor, a corruption factor. i think it's even good that the computer will replace it. uh, a number of these employees. for the simple reason that, firstly, it is cheaper and more efficient for the company, and a lot of it is on purpose. and i think it will be lost on such as for example, there is a direct concrete example of a tractor driver now one of the companies that we represent is developing absolutely amazing artificial intelligence systems. uh, and they are built into the machinery, which installed on agricultural machinery. and this is agricultural machinery. uh, already controlled by artificial intelligence absolutely without human intervention. uh, this project is very strongly supported by the government of the russian federation, and therefore, what conclusions were drawn, firstly. uh, a lot less

different cases at work, including injuries and so on. that is, if we directly saw this presentation, how the machine sees the world around us. uh, let's say a person, uh, is going to cross the road there, and the car sees the trajectory of the movement of his eyes, the trajectory of the movement of the body, and can, uh, absolutely, well , the maximum degree of probability to predict what further actions will be with slows down the speed and so on, a person can be distracted somewhere to look to fall asleep. well, anything, but there is a very interesting question, uh, related to the use of artificial intelligence, for example, in the field of jurisprudence. and now they say that it means they can replace lawyers. there are judges and so on. and how is this emotional connection there and a bunch of other issues, it means, uh, interesting world practice. on this account, uh, on the net on russian-language english-language sites. eh, walking. well, at least there are such rumors that allegedly in china , the court should run their court decisions through artificial intelligence, and let’s say such a test. if the program does not

agree with them, and the judge does not agree with the program, then he must, therefore, document all this, but fix and prove it. why does he think so? in fact? that's not exactly true and is, uh, the ruling of the supreme court, china where it is explained that artificial intelligence can only be applied in the field as well, as background information, but at the same time, but when the same gp chat appeared i wanted to. check something, i'll tell you the possibilities and in our company there is, and very much like that. well, a long chain of interviews is one of the highlights. we send the task, and the applicant, so to speak, for the position. and if i uploaded the task to the chat, and i must say that jackie chat answered absolutely all the questions correctly in this way. what conclusion did i draw that uh, for example, small positions or again technical secretaries and courts there. or maybe there are whole patches of lawyers who write there, uh, the same statements of claim. yes. there, like at the post office, for example, yes, 30 employees sit there and do

according to templates there, yes, everything now, of course, all this can replace a neural network, but they always remain. uh, issues like between family law, criminal law. although , again, there was also a very interesting precedent in colombia when the judge, well , such a question was a bit scandalous, because uh, hmm sport related to insurance payments. uh, sums for an autistic child. well, quite emotional, yes. and the judge decided to address this question to five chat rooms already and uploaded it there, which means that the case judge received the opinion of gpt, chat about what needs to be paid. well, judging, in fact , he made such a decision, because he was afraid of some kind of his emotional involvement. there was too strong involvement. well, in fact , we are now seeing in practice that these technologies are being introduced into life more and more, and well , to avoid the fact that some professions will disappear. well, there's nothing you can do about it. yes , artificial intelligence does not replace a person, but significantly facilitates his life in the modern world.

where is your speed of information processing, how efficient is the distribution of resources, time, finance, material values ​​gleb and by the way, this is a question for the profession of a journalist or a press secretary, but obvious artificial intelligence, some of them will cope more efficiently and quickly, the main thing and here at me immediately question. well, in the development of the topic. i note. even when we referred to experience the emergence of cars and the disappearance of a large number of professions related to grooming, caring for horses , and so on and so forth, nevertheless, veterinarians, for example, yes , they remained for horses, and people who train horses, that is, expensive specialists remained, while none to date. and then, by the way, also no completely low-paid work is inefficient, yes, which still needs to be performed. here it is not replaced by artificial intelligence. and it hasn't changed before. machines. and before that, it was not changed by steam engines and so on.

how do we already see now that the middle class is leaving the american corporation ibm plans to suspend the hiring of employees who could be replaced by an artificial one, moreover, they already did it and who were not fired by 18,000 about 8,000 people. another additional 18,000 people were fired. the four largest american connected corporations dumped, yes, they fired, the middle class, and now let's just make a small conclusion. yes this way yes a healthy piece of society that cements calm. he must either move to a low-paid position due to the fact that their professions will leave or look for some super motivation in himself to break into the elite, and we are talking about those countries where artificial intelligence programs will be launched.

yes, that is, we are not saying that some part of the profession will go away in the countries of starving africa. no, as there were 800-900 million people connected with the problems of getting food today, access to drinking water. so they will remain a question in that there will be more of the ultra-rich. that is very poor in the middle class will be destroyed completely agree with you. and by the way, returning to ibm, ceo mr. krishna noted that positions that are not related to working with clients are occupied by approximately 26,000 quote employees or i can easily imagine. how 30% of this will be replaced by artificial intelligence within five years is highlighted. he. actually, again, these are also the same what gleb was talking about , then we return to what the future generation should do? i think a lot youth of us. i hope they see this program. what then, can a man. i

think that well, after all, maybe not so critical. eh, everything can be for one simple reason, firstly, new specialties do appear. eh, for example. e the same. uh, also supporting all these neural networks of all these data centers. this is understandable. the thing is, there is programming mathematics, that is, we definitely look at it there, when we understand that the future belongs to some one industry, yes, then, well, probably, if we talk about where to go, then go into this industry. i also believe that the creative process is unlikely to ever move to neural networks for one simple reason, that after all, users of literature. the art of theater is a person and, probably, the relationship of a person. in any case, it will remain, and maybe become more valuable. eh, next. uh, behind this m-m profession, let's say, the same as the legal profession, after all, when the question concerns, there are definitions of the place of residence with a child. uh, the question of early release

from places of decision of freedom and i think that, well, after all, uh, we understand that hmm uh, artificial intelligence does not have an emotional component, and yet the laws. they are based. they all come out of morality, and the machine has no morality, as such, it can be owned and invested. uh, certain formulas and rules of law, on which it will operate there, so to speak, but when it comes to economic sports, then yes. uh, accountants will not be needed, because the program will be able to do everything ; also there, in principle, now the tax is very powerful. programs are also equipped there with everything you need, and networks and i don’t want to catch up on the juti, but now the most powerful computer that exists on earth is the so-called supercomputers, uh, there are not very many of them and well , they have much more computing power than ours at our personal computers with you, and

they work on a bit system. yes, and nolik and one, but quantum computers, but based on e, the latest radiation of quantum mechanics. and there we are already talking about the cubes killed. this means there is zero one, another third state at the same time and zero one, and the computing power of these computers is 800 million times greater than our computer. by the way, not so long ago we recalled the investment giant of the black company and so . let's pay attention, and the platform that was created was a blackrock company called aladdin which serves to manage investments and operations block attention to the screen, please. what if i told you that there is a robot, under who controls more wealth than any country on earth this robot is so powerful that in the last 10 years he has quietly created the largest company in the world this is the story of a robot named aladdin this is

wall street 's best kept secret spanning all asset classes across industries, aladin currently controls $21 trillion in our global economy by comparison. that's more than the $23 million gdp of the us or the $15 trillion gdp of the entire european union. is this how gleb will guess you? no? that's it i'm not afraid of games in large numbers. i'm not scared at all. uh know how to play ourselves a question. you can also return to the previous one. yes, that is, by and large today. the difference is that all complex systems are too complex for our computational methods to attach empathy to them. they are some kind of feeling. too complicated. they too require more uh big

computational solutions. that's all. if we return to science fiction, and not even science fiction, that's more or less close, and we do not talking about the world of gibson has the feeling that we are the world of gibson neuromancer. yes, we skip, we immediately go. here, yes, but let's remember the darktailer - this is walter miller jr. - this is 50. as far as i remember , the question is, can a robot play on stage? yes, if he uses as a program, well, the soul of a live actor or today, this has already been implemented with the help of a limited product, but nonetheless. we have created deffettes, but quite a long time ago several years ago, where little scenes plays, not an existing actor of a non-existing role. if we are talking about books, i would completely agree with you, but the fritzberg silver

eggs are the heads of those very, uh, thought mills that grind words and give out texts. it just so happens that gpt tea can produce texts as long as they are readable. perceived as a translation a good quality translation, but soulless, the only problem is that i watched, and the translation of the third version and now the fourth step is very visible. how long will it take to play with words really at the great level, at least from the point of view of bioletristics. we're not talking about tolstoy. yes, but we're talking about fiction. and this means that businesses will want to play it. why because it brings money, and in investing there, as it was rightly noted, it is not particularly necessary and so based on this. based on the fact that business is

big business. there are tasks to tie to the car. empathy, it means that it will be resolved one way or another, the question is how i do not exclude that they will tie, just the same person who will be responsible for empathy artificial intelligence. and that will be his job. he will be emotional, and the program will make a decision. i don’t see anything good in this, but what decisions can be taken here by attention to the screen of the three laws of robotics. let's remind our viewers. the three laws of robotics a robot cannot harm a human being or by its inaction allow a human to be harmed a robot must obey all orders given by a human unless these orders are in conflict according to the first law, the robot must take care of its safety to the extent that this does not contradict the first or second laws.

only he himself wrote such a little book, where the game is with three laws. each time in a new way in each story led to a certain tragic situation, then a blissful climax. plus, again , we remember who he was according to uh, his political convictions were very tough. frankly speaking , the anti-soviet anti-communist conservatives, in contrast to robert anson haylan, who the future liberal wrote the moon. harsh the hostess or the moon lays stiffness, yes, where is artificial intelligence the first thing he did he helped the mining workers of the moon to make a coup d'état and throw off the natural natural monopoly of earthlings. well, the land, as such, on the mining wealth of the moon, this was also the sixties. yes, we are now talking about science fiction, which is already

far behind us, if we talk about later things. no one has ever written anything good, and here i will take a small step. yes, and it just so happens that every time someone comes up with some science fiction concept. this concept is tried on by serious guys in jackets to see if it is realizable or not. these serious guys in jackets are by no means the state. if we talk about the same microsoft, he created everything, and he invited futurologists and science fiction writers to the conference of the future, and for several decades they have been coming once a year for three days to eat and talk. i remind you that on the air the program sas is authorized to declare we are talking about artificial intelligence , a threat or new opportunities for the future

of mankind, let's talk now a little more in detail, and in the next 10-20 years we should not expect a radical change in the nature of conflicts and the means of warfare. although the automation and miniaturization of weapons will continue, the conflicts themselves will not disappear and will take on new forms. a classic war of attrition with a huge expenditure of manpower and materiel, as 2022, 23 showed , a qualitative leap is still in demand with the advent of new power source materials that will make it possible for autonomous combat systems to exist with high potential, allowing to place an energy-intensive payload on them to expand the scope of artificial intelligence. although a person will still retain the ability to manage. devastating weapon systems to avoid the rise of the machines, which could really lead to a third world war a short story about

the dangers of artificial intelligence military focus on the screen talking about the use of artificial intelligence. in the military field. many people think of great power and dominance. true, forgetting about the other side of the coin, because artificial intelligence is dangerous not only for those against whom it is used, but also for those who use it, confirmation of this by american tests, with the participation of ai at one of the british military summits, the head of the us air force artificial intelligence department gave an example of a hypothetical experiment. drone with artificial intelligence. received the task to detect and destroy the zenith on enemy missile systems. at the same time , the person had to confirm each hit for which the drone received points, and the problem was that the artificial intelligence began to act on its own to blow up everything instead of obeying its operator, the system began to understand that although it identified a threat, sometimes the human operator told

it not to kill this threat to the artificial intelligence. this meant not earning points, so the drone decided to kill the operator who prevented it from reaching its goal, when it was discovered that changes were made to the operation of the complex that prohibited the destruction of the operator, however, artificial intelligence. found here exit, when the operator canceled the order to hit the target, the drone decided to attack the communications tower through which it received commands that conflicted with the combat mission. for all this, the us air force is actively experimenting with artificial intelligence. in recent years, in 2020, the ai-powered f-16 defeated a human opponent in five virtual dogfights, and late last year, the us department of defense conducted the first successful real-life test flight of the f-15 with and with a pilot in as part of the program to create a new autonomous aircraft by the end of 2023, however, if

in the united states the death of a person was hypothetical, then in levia everything turned out more tragically in march 2020, turkish drones filled with explosives attacked anti-government rebels in libya completely autonomously and even if this is the only case everything can change in the near future, many experts are not sure about the peaceful coexistence of man and artificial intelligence. igor calls you to our plot do you believe in mirnoe you know the coexistence of an artificial person many thousands of years ago, such a philosopher heraclitus said that war is the father of all and the king of all, and it seems to me that this is the whole nature of things, when one creates a sword, another needs to create a crossbow and there is a technology race and understandably. that artificial intelligence is also used in all types of weapons and will be perfected by all parties when

the knowledge of the nuclear bomb was transferred to the united states of america. the first thing they did was hit hiroshima with her and in this case. ah. i think the question is not about the peaceful existence of a man of artificial intelligence. again, the existence of man, but here something cannot be vouched for. yes, that some kind of conflict will not happen somewhere and people will not use all these tools that they have. it is very important at the legislative level to work out all the issues related to it with neural networks. and in fact , these same questions are partly raised by the masses when he spoke. let's take this semi-annual time-out. well we won't now touch on the reasons why he said it, if there are commercial purposes and so on, but uh, if you think about it again, where did i start huh? what well, the truth never keeps up with society and technology. and that's okay. sometimes you need to slow down a little, which the right has managed to catch up. for the same now, what is the difficulty there, yes, it consists in uh, let's say access there, uh, to yura, yes, yes, from the age of 13, but in fact, users there are of all ages, because no one can regulate or control this . in

italy, it was banned altogether, because it is there was a leak of confidential data, and again, people did it not out of malice. i want to solve some problem at work. took downloaded from gpt. and in the end it has already gone into the public domain. it's a neural network. she learns herself and these data they just remain in her later, and here a lot of questions arise in general, the security of the business, the security of people, cybersecurity will be the internet. so not very safe. and now it is becoming a very big threat. and this despite the fact that at the global level, cybersecurity issues should were beginning to be resolved in the twenty-second year at the un level. they figured that for five years they would develop some kind of common vision of the basic, uh, definitions, but in the twenty- second year that's all. naturally, it stopped. and as a result, not only are we not ahead, we are deeply behind and we are going to lag further, because again, when we

talked about cybersecurity, even understanding cybersecurity is a cyber storm. narrow as the danger that arises in connection with the use of high-tech funds and the west is very good at defending this position. let's here for this wait a while and going back again. they don't scare me. uh, presentation videos. boston dynek. doesn't scare me. even beautiful presentation videos from the f-16. what frightens me much more is that i can’t talk about the future right now. i can't tell right now this video was created on a computer this video was filmed in real life this video was released to influence me in positively, this video was released in order to influence me negatively or, well, this is

the most fantastic option. it's just a beautiful video. so this is the very situation when the pipe is never just a banana pipe, not just a banana, and so on and so forth. we are missing opportunities today. working with information as a resource and it's not just about creativity as a resource that we can rely on. the same gpt chat does, uh, the creation of a new text based on those that he collected earlier in such a question. and who is responsible for what texts get, as was rightly noted in italy, rested on the fact that yes, no one should answer. let's ban everything, and remember the story when vacuum cleaners were trained to recognize on the ground. yes, for this , photographs were used that were taken , you know, by other vacuum cleaners, it ended with the fact that suddenly, suddenly, people began to recognize that their e photographs were from the

bathroom. turned out to be, in general, access to yes, on this basis , artificial intelligence is trained simply because they did not pay attention to the vacuum cleaner used in the bathroom, yes with an information section. i would be afraid of this more why because we are again, returning to the 20 second year? what is happening right now is right next to us. this is not just a war in the style of the first world war many people many resources nightmarish consequences this is an information war in which