we bring the traditions of peace and calm together, change our views on the sound and robing. you are the light of yakmahalepshu. belarusians are so formidable ali them i know the homogeneous earth belarus 20

hello, on the air, the program sas is authorized to declare i am the host nadezhda sas greetings to you. this is a program for those who want to better understand what is happening and understand how these processes, events, people will affect the life of everyone in the life of the country, and the main events of world politics this week. let's tell. to you right now the son of us president hunter biden. pleaded guilty to tax evasion and made a deal with the investigation on the issue of illegal possession of weapons. this follows from the documents of the us attorney's office while investigating other possible offenses. hunter biden. continues at the white house. while breathing a sigh of relief. indeed, on these points. prosecutors

agreed to give biden jr. a suspended sentence. this categorically does not suit the republicans, who believe that hunterbaideno got off lightly solely because of his relationship with the president. at the same time, the president of the united states last week managed to sharply spoil relations with the president of the people's republic of china chinese leader sidepin was discouraged when the united states found chinese balloons over its airspace and beat them because they did not know about this mission , said american president joe biden at a fundraising event for an election campaign in california a big shame for dictators when they don’t know what happened, added biden, an hour later there was a sharp response from the chinese foreign ministry, the statement of the american side is extremely absurd and irresponsible. they seriously contradict basic facts , violate diplomatic protocols and encroach on china's political dignity , the chinese foreign ministry said.

all this happened literally a day after secretary of state anthony blinkin returned from beijing, who allegedly tried to ease tensions between the united states and cairo as part of a program to reduce costs by 100 million euros, the german media concern axel springer plans to fire several hundred employees of his publication bild and replace them with artificial intelligence, received a notification from the management. concern some employees of the group issues bills documents in particular reads. unfortunately, we will have to part with colleagues whose tasks in the digital world are carried out by artificial intelligence and or automated processes, there will no longer be the position of editorial directors of print production employees , proofreaders, secretaries and photo editors. what they are today in this way artificial intelligence technologies, radically changes the labor market, even in such creative professions as journalism.

and today's program i will start with a quote from the great science fiction writer and popularizer of science, a native of the town of petrovich on the border of russia and belarus, isaac asimov, a robot cannot harm a person, unless he proves that in the end it will be useful for all mankind. agree, what a tricky and complicated rule and it is more about us people than fragrances. and today we will be engaged in the popularization of science. we need to try to make complex things simple. language so that our viewers understand and appreciate the dangers and opportunities for the development of artificial intelligence technologies and help me in this will be deeply knowledgeable experts on the topic. igor ozersky lawyer, science fiction writer , board member of the russian union of industrialists and entrepreneurs. hello hello nadezhda thank you my colleague gleb lavrov is a journalist, political commentator for foreign affairs of cjsc second national tv channel. hello hello our discussion

we start with a blitz question of the advent of the era of artificial intelligence. already impossible stop gleb as you think, with your permission, not being a technical specialist in any way, but i still want to say that artificial intelligence is something that does not yet exist. not yet, but at the moment in which we all live now, and programs are being developed , special tools are being developed that already exist and that are already changing our world and here are the presence of these tools, and the strengthening of their influence on the social political economic military side of our life it's impossible to stop. and it's very big for all of us. humans as representatives of the biological species homo sapiens is a big challenge. igor

do you agree with gleb's position? of course, i absolutely agree that technical progress, fortunately or maybe, unfortunately , can't be stopped, of course, but this is a very interesting point. for me, as a lawyer , what is forbidden is that we see that society and technology are developing faster than the law and the biggest danger lies in how fast the legal community, in including legal doctrine will be able to keep up with this new era. well, let 's, before starting our full-fledged discussion, let's define what artificial intelligence is, artificial intelligence. it is a set of software algorithms that allow a computer or computer-controlled robot to mimic a range of human brain functionality and perform normally related tasks. with human activity, as a rule, artificial intelligence algorithms use several technologies that

allow machines to sense, understand , plan to act, and learn in the same way humans do. tell me, i roughly understand your position on this issue, but if we talk about artificial intelligence in the format in the form that we have at the moment. it is still a threat or an opportunity for the future of humanity for the future of humanity. this is a threat even by the definition that is given here, and i would just add here, artificial intelligence, real big artificial intelligence. he will put himself strategic tasks. it says tactics tactics now, even programs that exist today can determine for themselves. they do not yet define strategic tasks and do not set strategic goals for themselves. so here is the challenge now. available it allows, when working with artificial intelligence, in the form

in which it is today, there are special programs by and large, so, it allows those people who work with it to get such a serious competitive advantage that it is impossible not to work with it moreover, a person will have to adapt to these programs, to these software products, and these technical capabilities, because otherwise he will not be competitive in the basic configuration. let's pay attention to the topic of thoughts that are present in the minds of famous people with regards to artificial intelligence. perhaps you agree with some of them gleb please, artificial intelligence. that case when it is necessary to be far-sighted enough in questions of regulation. otherwise it may be too late artificial intelligence, computer. overtake the intellect. human already in the next 100 years and when this happens, you need to make sure that

the goals of a computer and a person will coincide, they will run counter to each other, tools of control with the help of artificial intelligence give an inalienable advantage to a totalitarian regime over open societies igor who do you agree with whose opinion is closer you in this question, answering this question, you need to pay attention that elon musk and stephen hawking are popularizers. and musk is basically a showman. and stephen hawking uh very well-known popularizers of physics. and uh , anyway. here are the quotes. they are more for show than they are in real life. when, er, a very famous story happened with open ai, which was taken by gpt-chat, then ilonska, being its original investor recently. yes, with the petition let's pause. but e, like, well , it seems to me that now everyone can see it happened due to the fact that the development went to microsoft

and then bill gates wrote. uh, a scientific article is not very large. well, even such a simple article. and where a bill gates expresses the opinion that, in fact, the era of artificial intelligence. that is the title of this article. and this is a new stage of humanity. which he compares with the advent of silicon silicon microprocessors and the advent of a graphical interface, which became a continuation of windows, and now, considering the whole situation with artificial intelligence in general, i absolutely agree with my colleague that those programs that are now called artificial intelligence of a neural network , in fact. this is a program that has two e, the parameters of adaptability and independence, but they are recognized to solve only one specific problem. and there is such a thing as general artificial intelligence. it still remains within the confines of science fiction. and i think that at the moment what is needed is not artificial intelligence in the sense that it is now about those technologies that accompany artificial intelligence, the so-called quantum

computers, something that stephen hawking just wrote about and the whole world right now there is a quantum race. and this quantum race can lead to the fact that those neural networks that exist now will become artificial intelligence in general. and here is the threat that everyone says, it lies in some. what, by the way, is said, here is a quote from elon musk: the issue of regulation , a person can cease to have control. yes, over general artificial intelligence. gleb i would like us to give our viewers the opportunity to hear one more definition. who are the ludites, these are the participants in the spontaneous protests of the primrose of the 19th century against the introduction of machines during the industrial revolutions in england and from the point of view of loot, machines ousted people from production, which led to technological unemployment , often protest was expressed in pogroms and the destruction of machines and equipment of the modern new ludit this person who uses a push-button phone instead of an iphone

subscribes to magazines instead of browsing them on your tablet and more. gleb, you always put it there, and i don't hide a push-button telephone from me. i subscribe. moreover, i read books. well. unlike the fact that i get information about work, naturally through the screen, but i read books on paper and i think that here i am close to umbert, eco, who spoke. yes, i'm a medieval type, i count books in paper. this is the middle ages you have books. these are the texts on the screen, but if you are in the future, but if the electricity suddenly goes out for a second, you will find yourself in the stone age, and i will still be in the middle ages therefore, yes here, but jokes are jokes. er, nonetheless. yes, i am a new ludit by definition, however, i will not go smash, of course, e. some production, but on the other hand, if you pay attention even to the definition of buddhism.

it was the emergence of machines that led to the industrial revolution to the emergence of new classes of class struggle. as such, and imagine the appearance of new types of machines alone , transformed the world led to numerous revolutions led to the confrontation of systems. this is the level of transition from neanderthals to khomus is an opportunity. yes, they were close in biology, the only question is with us , the only question is what we could do to use, they used it and adapted it much faster than they did not know how. here, just the same , a technological tool appears with software that makes people. which they possess are not just more effective, but the next step in development. this is not an additional opportunity, it is an opportunity

without which the only question is that i, as a representative of homo sapiens, am not happy. the neanderthals were not very happy, probably, with the appearance of homo sapiens. so just the same, i'm not happy about the appearance of what that the next generation is the edge of my civilization the edge of my era, it is already visually visible. what specific time period are you talking about? you are now, when you have to be afraid already at all. well, uh, i'm more of a pessimist. i'm talking about two generations, as we see from the soros quote, and how do we actually see from the development of uh? today already existing companies, we are talking about what palantir has used, and its programs for work with the management of large human resources. yes, to work with the prediction of the action of large human communities. it

has already been used right now in the ukrainian conflict. and after that i sold my programs to the uk department of defense . well, we always come up with something new when we do. we first this business. we are trying to turn a prodigy. this, of course, is now in very simple language and sounds rather shockingly frightening, but nonetheless. now, if you can , oh, yours for manifestation in the field of activity in the field of law, japan for training artificial intelligence cancels, as far as i understand or has already canceled, but copyright. imagine this is what based right now a hefty body of legal knowledge and most importantly a hefty body of economics. mutually, uh, the influence yes of different systems in someone of the same children today. everything goes a piece,

informational exclusivity, in principle, because it is necessary for training artificial intelligence, if we are talking about the next stage. dear comrades who are watching us, and in 15-20 years you will need to get a job in a reputable international office. or maybe earlier you will need to provide all the most candid photos of yourself exposing your social networks in the hr department just to show what risks your employer may face, because he will face them anyway, because the hardware capabilities will still be strong enough to control each person directly there is a reverse situation it is thanks to modern technological capabilities that

the information space is now being optimized. and as far as i understand, it has already been said that a new programs should become personal. that is, each of us will have our own little gps chat attached to our record. yes, to our ip, perhaps, perhaps even more to something personal, so this is the optimization of the information space. this means that we will never be able to, and go to the search engine. try to find something new for yourself and believe that this search is really random so that google does not go far into them when, uh, the question became whether bidens are attracted for corruption or not bribe for corruption little domestic american election issue all that, but americans are faced with the fact that people with a republican point of view

saw this news. oh, the democrats did not see her, that is, they are special. it was necessary to look for it, please, give you the floor, but if we talk about fears, then, probably, we should be afraid now and i can prove it. the fact is that until recently we did not know about gt and it happened instantly, that is a number of some developments that are underway, we don’t know anything about them, they are classified somewhere in within the walls of large corporations, and then it is issued as a finished product, ready for use. since we remembered the gtp chat let's display the graphics the use of artificial intelligence in creativity , let's call it that means, if we are talking about the protection of intellectual property, then in general, this is a very interesting question. they are just related to the work of artificial intelligence, and there is such a thing as the results of intellectual activity, and in law, in legislation, this is understood as a product activity of the human brain. and now, uh, there are a lot

of legal cases, let's say, and the mfa jorney uh program creates an image and who will own the copyright to this image, there are several points of view on this matter, while there are no right answers at the moment. although, by the way, the question has been for quite a long time such as the first point of view that, while the copyright will belong to the neural network itself, and it seems that this can be funny, since artificial intelligence. in theory, the right cannot have subjectivity, if we switch to russian, then the right to be subject is to be, e, the subject of the bearer of these rights, but at the same time , a normative act was adopted in the european union, which calls into question the possibility of granting such a right, but limited to the second option. e that the author of the program is the object of copyright, the subject of copyright is an interesting jurisprudence. on this score, it means there were two cases, but in china there is another one

in australia. so, the case both of them are connected with the fact that there was a neural network , which has developer, but then the user created some kind of object using this neural network. uh, the results of intellectual activity. in the first case , a magazine was made for television, which was then used, respectively, this station and, uh, the copyright holders. eh, even if they consider themselves to be the copyright holders, the developers of the neural network, they presented from the company, which means, due to their neural network, they created this product and they say this is ours. you have to pay us for this. it was a process in china and a similar process was in australia and two the courts issued two diametrically opposed decisions. and the court in china took the side of the developers of the neural network and said that as well as, in fact. this is a product of work, a program owned by the developers, then they are industry rights, yes

, australian he said that since the user also invested some well , he made his contribution, yes, and yet it was through him. well, creativity. yes, so let's say some used program was made, then the high school refused. and right here. uh, these are just a few points of view the following is the point view that the user can be, but if we look, let's say the fourth part of the civil code on russian legislation, then this cannot be said in our legislation. the idea is that only through the creative work of mental labor can the results of intellectual activity remain. if we, as it were, loaded the data into the program and gave the result, then this is not an object of copyright and hence the fourth position arises, in my opinion, the most e, controversial e. the fact that hmm the results of intellectual activity created by the neural network is in the public domain. by the way, this is very important. it seems to me that this is what humanity should be allowed to do.

well, artificial intelligence is different from the human one, it does not get tired, it does not give in to the influence of emotions, it is able to process huge masses of information in a short time, it is these advantages that make the solution of artificial intelligence effective in a number of industries. in which lives has the skillful intellect performed best and why? igor now addresses this question to you as a person who is interested, who can already be called an expert in this field. you know, we have a lot of leaders among our clients. e of the russian market, which earn artificial intelligence products. and this is the question he and you are most on the agenda. and , probably, most of all, people in general are worried that artificial intelligence will replace, so to speak, the jobs that exist, but here the first thing is, uh, a retrospective analysis of the situation in due time there were no cars. everyone rode horses and there were a huge number of professions related to horses. then, when cars appeared , all these professions. it did not, but a huge number of other professions appeared. recently

we are with you. well, we watched how such professions as bloggers, coaches, appeared, which were also not known before, and dell conducted a study and in this conclusion appears the idea that, in just a few years, there will be almost 80 number of professions, oh, which we are now we don't even think about it. a about what professions are already crowding out these neural networks. and firstly, these are those professions that, well, do not require, probably , some kind of deep human thinking , that is, routine work, for example, bank employees who conduct, a analytics on the possibility of issuing a loan. and here there is a human factor, a corruption factor. i think it's even good that a computer will replace it. uh, a number of these employees. for the simple reason that, firstly, it is cheaper and more efficient for the company, and a lot specially. and i think it will be lost on such as for example, there is a direct concrete

example of a tractor driver now one of the companies that we represent is developing absolutely amazing artificial intelligence systems. e, and they are built into the machinery that is installed on agricultural machinery. and this is agricultural machinery. uh, already controlled by artificial intelligence absolutely without human intervention. uh, this project is very strongly supported by the government of the russian federation and a means, what conclusions were made, firstly. uh, a lot less different cases at work, including injuries and so on. that is, if we directly saw this presentation, how the machine sees the world around us. uh, let's say a person, uh, is going to cross the road there, and the car sees the trajectory of movement of his eyes, the trajectory of movement of the body, and can, uh absolutely, well , the maximum degree of probability to predict what further actions will be with slows down the speed and so on, the person can be distracted somewhere to look to sleep. well,

anything, but there is a very interesting question, uh, related to the use of artificial intelligence, for example, in the field of jurisprudence. and now they say that it means they can replace lawyers there, judges and so on. and how is this emotional connection there and a bunch of other questions. this means that this is an interesting world practice. on this account, e is on the net on russian-language english-language sites. eh, walking. well, at least there are rumors that allegedly in china , judges, e, must drive their court decisions through artificial intelligence, but on let's say a check. if the program does not agree with them, and the judge does not agree with the program, then he must, therefore, document all this, but fix and prove it. why does he think so? really? this is not quite true, and there is, uh, the ruling of the supreme court of china , which clarifies that artificial intelligence can only be applied in the field as, well, as background information, but at the same time, but when the same gp chat appeared i wanted to. check it out, but i'll tell you the possibilities exist in our company, and it's very similar. well,

a long chain of interviews is one of the moments. we send the task, and let's say to the applicant for the position, and if the tasks i uploaded to the chat. and i must say that jackie chat answered absolutely all questions correctly in this way. what conclusion did i draw that, for example, small positions or, again, technical secretaries and courts there. or maybe some. here are the whole patches of lawyers who write the same statements of claim there. yes, there at the post office, for example, yes, 30 employees sit there and do according to the templates there, and that’s all. now, of course, all this can replace the neural network, but they always remain. uh, such questions to the world, family law. criminal law. although , again, there was also a very interesting precedent in colombia when the judge. well, yes, it was a bit of a scandalous question, because, uh, hmm, the sport was about insurance payments. uh, sums for an autistic child. well, quite emotional , yes. and the judge decided to address this question to five chat rooms already and uploaded it there,

which means that the case judge received the opinion of gpt, chat about what needs to be paid. well, judging, in fact, such a decision was made, because he was afraid of some kind of his emotional involvement. there is too much involvement. well , in fact, we are now seeing in practice that these technologies are increasingly being introduced into life and, well, to avoid the fact that some professions will disappear. well, there's nothing you can do about it. yes, artificial intelligence does not replace a person, but significantly facilitates his life in the modern world. where is your speed of information processing, how efficient is the distribution of resources , time, finance, material values ​​gleb i by the way, this is also a question for the profession of a journalist or a press secretary, but an obvious artificial intelligence will cope with some of them more efficiently and faster. the main thing and here i immediately have a question. well, in the development of the topic. i note.

even when we referred to the experience of the emergence of cars and the disappearance of a large number of professions related to grooming, caring for horses, and so on and so forth, nevertheless, veterinarians, for example, for horses, they remained, and people who train horses, that is remained expensive experts, and none today. and then, by the way, also no completely low-paid work is inefficient, yes, which still needs to be performed. here it is not replaced by artificial intelligence. and before that did not change machines. and before that, it was not changed by steam engines and so on. how do we already see that the middle class is leaving the american corporation ibm plans to suspend the hiring of employees who could be replaced by artificial intelligence ; moreover, they did it and who were not fired 18,000 about 8,000 people. another additional 18,000 people were fired. the four largest american connected corporations dumped, yes, they fired, the middle class, and now

let's just make a small conclusion. yes, in this way yes, a healthy piece of society that cements calmness. he must either move to a low-paid position due to the fact that their professions will leave or look for some super motivation in himself to break into the elite, and we are talking about those countries where artificial intelligence programs will be launched. yes, that is, we we are not saying that some part of the profession will go away in the countries of starving africa. no, there, as there were 800-900 million people connected with the problems of getting food today, access to drinking water, so they will remain the question of what there will be more of the ultra-rich. here the very poor in the middle class will be destroyed completely

agree with you. and by the way, and returning to ibm , ceo mr. krishna noted that positions that are not related to working with clients are occupied by approximately 26,000 employees. quotes or can easily imagine how 30% of this will be replaced by artificial intelligence within five years stressed. he. actually, again, these are also the same about what gleb said, then we return to what the future generation should do. i think a lot of the youth of us. i hope they see this program. what then, can a man. i think that well, after all, maybe not so critical. eh, everything can be for one simple reason, firstly, new specialties do appear. eh, for example. e the same. uh, also supporting all these neural networks of all these data centers. this is understandable. the thing is, there is programming mathematics, that is, we definitely look at it when we understand that the future belongs to some one industry, yes, that means, well

, probably, if we talk about where to go, then go to this industry. i also believe that the creative process is unlikely to ever be transferred to neural networks for one simple reason, that after all, users of literature. the art of theater is a person and, probably, the relationship of a person. it is in any case remain, and perhaps become more valuable. eh, next. uh, behind this m-m profession, let's say, the same as the legal profession, after all, when the question concerns, there are definitions of the place of residence with a child. e the question of early release from the places of decision of freedom and i think that well, after all, uh, we understand that hmm uh, artificial intelligence does not have an emotional component and yet the laws. they are based. they come out of morality, and the machine has no morality, as such, it can be owned and invested. uh, certain formulas and rules of law, on which it will operate there, so to speak, but when it comes to economic sports, then yes.

eh, accountants will not be needed, because the program will be able to do everything by sending a report to the tax half of the employees of the tax, probably they will not be needed, because there, in principle, the tax is now very powerful. the program is also equipped there with all the necessary e-networks, and you know i don’t want to be juthi, but right now the most powerful computer that exists on earth is the so-called super computers, and there are not very many of them, and well, their computing abilities are much greater than ours , our personal computers, and they work on a bit system. yes, and nolik and one, but quantum computers, but based on e, the latest radiation of quantum mechanics. and there we are already talking about the beaten killed. this means there is zero one, another third state at the same time and zero one, and the computing power of these computers is 800 million times greater than our computer. by the way, not so long ago we recalled the investment the giant of the black company is like that. let

's pay attention, and the platform that was created by a blackrock company called aladdin which serves to manage investments and operations attention to the screen, please. what if i told you that there is a robot that controls more wealth than any country on earth this robot is so powerful that in the last 10 years, he quietly created the largest company in the world this story is about a robot named aladdin this is most guarded a wall street secret that spans all asset classes across all industries, aladin currently controls $21 trillion in our global economy by comparison . that's more than the $23 million gdp of the us or the $15 trillion gdp of the entire european union. that's how gleb scares. no, that's it. i'm

not afraid of playing with big numbers. i'm not scared at all. uh know how to play ourselves a question. you can also return to the previous one. yes, that is, by and large today . the difference is that all complex systems too complex for our computational methods to tie empathy to. they are some kind of feeling. too complicated. they too require more uh big computational solutions. that's all. if we return to science fiction, and not even science fiction, that's more or less close, and we are not talking about the world of gibson, it feels like we are the world of gibson a neuromancer. yes, we skip, we immediately go. here, yes, but let's remember the darktailer - this is walter miller jr. this is 50. as far as i remember , the question is, can a robot play on

stage? yes, if he uses as a program, well, the soul is the image of a live actor today. it's already been done with a limited product for the time being, but still. we have deffakes created, and quite a long time ago a few years ago, where little scenes is played by a non-existent actor of a non-existent role. if we are talking about books, i would completely agree with you, but the friedsberg silver eggs of the head are the same, uh, thought mills that grind words and give out texts. it just so happens that part of gpt can give out texts as long as they are readable. perceived as a translation a good quality translation, but soulless , the only problem is that i watched, and the translation of the third version and now the fourth

step is very visible. how much will it take to play words on a really high level, at least from the point of view of biolematics. we're not talking about tolstoy. yes, but we're talking about fiction. and this means that businesses will want to play it. why because it makes money, and in investing there, how true it was noticed especially it is not necessary and so based on this. based on the fact that business is big business. there are tasks to tie to the car. empathy, it means, will be resolved one way or another, the question is how i do not exclude that they will tie, just the same person who will be responsible for the empathy of artificial intelligence. and that will be his job. he will be emotional, and the program will make a decision. i just don’t see anything good in this, but what decisions

can these attention to screen three make? law workers. let's remind our viewers. the three laws of robotics a robot cannot harm a person or by its inaction allow a person to be harmed, a robot must obey all orders given by a person, except in cases where these orders are contrary to the first law, the robot must take care of its safety to the extent that which does not contradict the first or second laws. only he himself wrote such a little book, where the game is played by three laws. each time in a new way in each story led to e, a certain tragic situation, then a blissful climax. plus, again , we remember who he was according to uh, his political convictions were very tough. frankly speaking

, the anti-soviet anti-communist conservatives, in contrast to robert anson haylan, who the future liberal wrote the moon. the harsh mistress or the moon lays rigidity, yes, where is artificial intelligence the first thing he did he helped the mining workers of the moon to make a coup d'état and throw off the natural natural monopoly of earthlings. well, the earth, as such, on the moon's mining wealth is it was also in the sixties. yes, we are now talking about science fiction, which is already far behind us, if we talk about later things. no one has ever written anything good, and here i will take a small step. yes, and it just so happens that every time someone comes up with some kind of science fiction concept. this concept is tried on by serious guys in jackets to see if it is realizable

or not, and these serious guys in jackets are by no means states. if we talk about the same microso, he created everything, and conference of the future, where he invited futurologists and science fiction writers, and for several decades they have been coming once a year for three days to eat, drink and talk. i remind you that on the air the sas program is authorized to declare that we are talking about artificial intelligence, a threat or new opportunities for the future of mankind, we will talk a little more in detail now, and in the wars of the future and in the next 10-20 years, you should not expect a radical change in the nature of conflicts and means of conducting it is not worth it. although the automation and miniaturization of weapons will continue, the conflicts themselves will not disappear. and take on new forms. a classic war of attrition with a huge

expenditure of manpower and materiel, as 2023 showed, a qualitative leap is still in demand with the advent of new materials and power sources that will make it possible for autonomous combat systems with high potential to be placed on them to expand energy-intensive payloads from the field of artificial intelligence. although a person will still retain the ability to manage. most destructive weapons systems to avoid the rise of the machines, which could really lead to a third world war a short story about the dangers of artificial intelligence military area of ​​focus on the screen talking about the use of artificial intelligence. in the military field. many people think of great power and dominance. true, forgetting about the other side of the coin, because artificial intelligence is dangerous not only for those against whom it is used, but also for those who use it . summits in britain, the head of

the artificial intelligence department of the us air force gave an example of a hypothetical experiment. drone with artificial intelligence. received the task to detect and destroy enemy anti-aircraft missile systems. at the same time, a person had to confirm each hit for which the drone received points, and the problem was that artificial intelligence began to act at its own discretion to blow up everything in a row, instead of obeying its operator, the system began to understand that although it determined threat, sometimes the human operator told her not to kill this threat to artificial intelligence. this meant not earning points, so the drone decided to kill the operator, who prevented it from reaching its goal, when it was discovered that changes were made to the operation of the complex, prohibiting the destruction of the operator. however, artificial intelligence here i found a way out, when the operator canceled the order to hit the target, the drone decided to attack the communications tower through which it received commands that conflicted with combat

task with all this, the us air force is actively experimenting with artificial intelligence. in recent years, in 2020 , the ai-powered f-16 defeated a human opponent in five virtual dogfights, and late last year, the us department of defense conducted its first successful real test flight. 16 with and a pilot, and as part of the program to create a new autonomous aircraft by the end of 2023, however, if in the usa the death of a person was hypothetical, then in levia everything turned out more tragically in march 2020, turkish drones loaded with explosives attacked anti-government rebels in libya completely autonomously and even if this is the only case everything can change in the near future, many experts are not sure about the peaceful coexistence of man and artificial intelligence. igor what emotions does our story evoke in you?

do you believe in the peaceful coexistence of man many thousands of years ago, such a philosopher heraclitus said that war is the father of all and the king of all, and it seems to me that this is the whole nature of things, when one creates a sword, another needs to create a crossbow and there is a technology race and it's clear. that artificial intelligence is also used in all types of weapons and will be perfected by all parties when the knowledge of the nuclear bomb was transferred with the state of america. the first thing they did was hit hiroshima with her and in this case. uh, i think the question is not about the peaceful existence of a man of artificial intelligence. again, the existence of man, but here something cannot be vouched for. yes, that some kind of conflict will not happen somewhere and people will not use all these means that they have it is very important at the legislative level to work out all the issues related to it by universities. and in fact, these same questions, in part, raised us when he spoke. let's

take this semi-annual time-out. well, now let's not go into the reasons why he said it, if there are commercial purposes and so on, but uh, if you think again what i started, yes, what well, the law never keeps up with society and technology. and that's okay. sometimes you need to slow down a bit, which the right has managed to catch up. here is the same gpt there what is the difficulty, yes, is uh, let's say access there, er, up to yura yes from the age of 13, but in fact, users there are of all ages, because no one can regulate or control this. in italy, it was banned altogether, because there was a leak of confidential data, and again, people didn’t do it out of evil. i want to solve some problem at work. i downloaded it from gt-chat, but in the end it was already shared. it's a neural network. she learns herself and these data they just remain in her later, and here it is very a lot of questions arise in the whole business security security people cyber security. be the internet so not strongly secure. and now it is becoming a very big

threat. and this despite the fact that at the global level, cybersecurity issues should have begun to be resolved in the twenty-second year at the un level. they figured that for five years they would develop some kind of common vision of the basic, uh, definitions, but in the twenty- second year that's all. naturally, it stopped. and as a result, we are not only not ahead, we are deeply behind and are going to fall further behind, because again, when we talked about cybersecurity, even the understanding of cybersecurity is a cyber storm. as narrow as the danger that arises in connection with the use of high-tech means and the west is very good at defending this position. let's here for this wait a while and going back again. they don't scare me. uh,

presentation videos. boston dynek. doesn't scare me. even the beautiful presentation videos from the f16 scare me much more than that i can't right now is not about the future speech. i can't tell right now this video was created on a computer this video was filmed in real conditions this video was made to influence me positively this video was made to influence me negatively or, well, this is the most fantastic option . it's just a beautiful video. so this is the very situation when the pipe is never just a banana pipe, not just a banana, and so on and so forth. we are missing opportunities today. work with information as a resource not only now about creativity, as with a resource on which we can rest. the same chat gpt makes the creation of a new text

based on those that he collected before the question in this one. and who is responsible for what texts get, as it was rightly noted in italy, they rested on the fact that yes, no one should answer. let's ban everything, and remember the story when vacuum cleaners were taught to recognize on the ground. yes, for this , photographs were used that were taken, you know, by other vacuum cleaners, it's over the fact that all of a sudden people began to find out that their photographs were from the bathroom. they turned out to be, in general, access nailno. yes, artificial intelligence is trained on this basis simply because they did not pay attention to the vacuum cleaner that was used in the bathroom, yes, with an information section. i would be afraid of this more why because we are again, returning to the 20 second year?

what is happening right now is right next to us. this is not just a war in the style of the first world war. many people, many resources. nightmarish consequences. this is an information war in which these most modern means and technologies give one of the parties an undeniable advantage in mental control over cognitive control over the other side. now imagine that everything is the same, but on the one hand. we do not have a single state, another state or a blog of states, and on the one hand, the state, on the other, a block of states, a third private company, pursuing its interests to seize control of the land. ukraine is also a block on the fourth side with us suddenly.

manufacturers of amazing new drones who need publicity. yes, on the fifth side we have saudi arabia that will decide to try to launch artificial intelligence, because , for example, they have already developed documents for granting limited citizenship to artificial intelligence, because they want to work in the next iteration of humanity new switzerland yes , aircraft will improve and occupy new niches, but if we talk about phobias, probably the classic phobia which present in many minds. yes, this is such a terrible chipization of humanity. please tell me, igor, how do you feel about experiments with the introduction of chips into the human body and all kinds of processes. you know, i am very interested in this, but i don’t know, a lot of people share my opinion, but just talking with colleagues who are engaged in development and and they expressed a very interesting idea that at

some point we people will compete with intellect. well, it's clear that it is absolutely impossible to compete with him in our present state, when you are sensitive abilities are enormous. and here again, that development of the mask, when the monkeys implanted a chip, uh, so that she could control the computer in the mode, so this thought is online, uh, it’s probably moreover, this operation takes without anesthesia, well, there’s something like an hour, yes, and there is a bunch of neural wires that need to be connected to the neurons of the brain. well , you have to think that i think there is a high probability that then, and these chips they will be so say, some not even to full reality, but chips to full consciousness, and here my colleagues suggest that a person will have to develop himself to the speed of thinking of artificial intelligence, so that in the end there would not be some kind of world collapse. and you know, there's something else i'd like to add here.

ah, he said, yes, in my opinion, a very correct idea that we have information, it has ceased to carry the power of information, that is, we can never say that a fact is a fact or is it some kind of pseudo false fact and etc. and how uh hmm, all this affects our reality in general. and i, well, let's say that, as far as we say, false information can really influence humanity. we recently traveled to the lugansk people's republic with humanitarian aid. and we mean, we enter the territory and see a giant exit traffic jam. just huge in general. well, how to go there at all, because it lasted. well, i don’t know, there are many there, of course, 20, probably, and when we arrived we were already talking with the local population. what happened? they speak in telegram channels passed a message about what it means there is being prepared. uh, counter offensive vsu, and how it affected the minds of people, yes, that is, right away. uh, interruptions in general in public life. and when does it do it? it is too. just the same is done using all these programs. there i don’t know with or without a neural network, but if this whole story is

put on stream, and we won’t be able to distinguish truth from lies at all. and plus, what's scary is that the same neural networks. here i am the migiorni program, yes, which we saw, uh, images are created, voice effects, that is, a the program creates images of people, speaks with their voice. it is already now and it is no longer possible to distinguish a fake from a non-fake, and then they were hali who say, yes, programs can create texts. yes, programs can create visual wonders, then the next step. yes , programs can play the role of god let 's pay attention to the topic of experiments with the introduction of chips into the body in detail in our story, we will discuss this briefly. back in the last century, people began to implant various electronic devices into their bodies in order to improve their health, the most common to this day. day remains a pacemaker. today , technology has stepped forward, far ahead and in the first place.

this is due to the name of elon mask, his neurolink project is associated with the development of an implant, which is capable of transmitting signals from the brain to a computer, that is, people with disabilities will be able to control objects with the power of thought and even restore their lost motor functions for the first time this device was shown in july 2019 , the chip looks like a coin its diameter is 23 mm, and the thickness of eight microprocessors is implanted under the skin and connected to the brain, the entire operation is performed by a robot surgeon who drills a hole in the skull and connects the electrodes. according to the mask, the operation, painless and does not require anesthesia, the patient can leave the clinic on the same day after implantation , no traces of the owner remain. the microprocessor reads the data in the brain and connects to various devices via bluetooth at a distance of up to 10 m, the implants have already shown their effectiveness during animal experiments in 2021. the chip was implanted in the brain of a nine-year-old

macaque. after that, a video was shown in which the primate plays a video game with the power of thought, a in december 2022. musk showed another video from the laboratory, where a monkey asks for food with the power of thought on the frames you can see how the animal moves the cursor according to the words on the on-screen keyboard and thus asks for fruit by 2024 , they plan to switch to testing neurochips on humans in russia and implants have been developed in the usa embedded in the brain that can restore a person's memory. this will be possible due to the internal stimulation of neural connections in the brain. however, some experts are skeptical about the possibilities that the elon musk project and similar technologies promise. since the human brain is very complex and any incorrect interference. it can harm him, according to scientists, in order to decipher all the information that our brain transmits, much more knowledge about it is needed. and this is the main problem. in addition, it is possible that hackers can gain access to implanted chips or

another device, causing a malfunction with the ability to override the consequences of such actions can be fatal to a person. some even fear that artificial intelligence will be able to suppress and take control of the mind of its owner. yes, glebsk. i think many people cannot say goodbye to this fear, and in fact, based on our discussion today. we understand that there is a reason for that. tell the republic of belarus artificial intelligence. still, painstaking work is carried out in the same way as in the russian federation even has programs that can compete with the same western developments, and alexander lukashenko expressed his point of view about the world of the future. let's hear the emiration work. uh, on artificial intelligence, chinese scientists there. they collected their money details. they worked seriously, and they asked me to help them work in belarus, i say,

yes, the lord is with you to come, why did i fall for this, let's say not only because there will be 5 billion dollars of investment. and they they promised me to create this smart city and there , uh, a powerful educational platform for artificial intelligence will be there. the university will train people, and in the west they begin to understand that there is nothing to do with foolishness. it is necessary to cooperate with the belarusians, because as soon as joint work can bear fruits that will be truly positive and useful for humanity, because if we have an arms race, and this will not only concern ground wars, then a will transfer all this into the space. there may already be completely other scales, catastrophes of the future, damn it, that's why i say that this is an unstoppable process, and i am afraid of it only because i am a homo sapiens representative of a socio-biological species, the only and unique. i know from

previous experience of my species that we may not be destroyed, smart machine. but we will do everything to make it work, moreover, we ourselves will want and connect ourselves to a. with a neuroimplant in the book of networks, we will directly build a matrix ourselves, enter it and close ourselves from the inside, and it will be a different humanity. this will not be homo sapiens. it will be. maybe. it will be a nice metahomene name, especially the already registered trademart, though igor, well, what is the final word of today's program, please know if these chips become mass-produced. i do not rule out that i will agree to bet, i'm interested, at least. and i think that in conclusion of everything, we understand that technological progress cannot be stopped, and it will be let's observe and enjoy this observation. bravo thank you so much incredible intellectuals today in the sass program

authorized to say what can i say? in conclusion, the future is always scary. and, as pelevin wrote, the horror of a person before the future is dictated by the fact that, unlike animals , a person realizes that he will end. , as it has existed until now, and in conclusion i want to quote the writer we have already mentioned. arthur c. clarke 's asimov's law of robotics has become a successful literary tool. possibly irony or maybe it will be a masterstroke, but in general , asimov's stories refute the point of view from which he began to impossibly limit the behavior of robots by inventing and applying some set of rules. thanks for today. that's it, it was a program sasa is authorized to declare. any breakthrough technologies carry in themselves.