[000:00:00;00] pain or an outbreak in russia is reflected in their condition in the same way, so the president has, let's say, the people's business before the conflicts of karabakh, the situation on the tajik , the afghan border, which is sometimes not visible to the layman, but lukashenka clearly understands how these or those flashes will also affect our internal security, so the fugitives saw this as a window of opportunity. here it is the long-awaited russian turmoil revolt, senseless and merciless. now it means, if it vaguely flares up. the west will no longer decide on a hybrid aggression against belarus, but a full-fledged intervention. and we will finally be brought in a wagon train and assigned here. this means that some local overseers of this, thus not themselves at home, are a people who will later be turned into e, a kind of community that will be guided by the ideology that

the fugitives profess. well, look , another miracle didn't happen that they were obviously counting on, the west, i mean, that's why, when the black swan is literally circling already, but over the head of the opposition vsu, did not improve and break through the counter-offensive. it didn't happen. here i would pay tribute not only to the generals directly in charge of the special military operation, but to that same company commander vanka, who is on the front line with his fighters. here, uh, the average officers are privates, regardless of their attitude to current events, because they understand that they are rebels. they tried to speculate around the ideas of social justice, and in many ways. where is u them slogans and their grievances echoed the fact that there is a soul of fighters at the front, but a russian soldier, in contrast to the situation from 1.18

, the analogy with which they tried. conducted by representatives of the western expert community already enough, rubbing their hands in anticipation of the civil war. subsequent interventions in russia russian soldiers did not repeat these mistakes russian soldiers and russian officers. i understood the evil. uh, the collapse of the front for all of russia for the future of the country, therefore, the front not only held on in ukraine , blows continued to rush, and i sincerely i am proud, let's say, of the forecast that i expressed in the discussion. you can't imagine him with one of my western colleagues. how many different kinds of experts and those in relation to which i know that they are not quite experts. eh, they tried to get an assessment of what is happening and how belarus sees its future in the context of russia, which in their minds was already falling apart into some fragments. here, i expressed the point of view that the crisis from russia will be quickly occupied by intervention. uh, heads of state by making certain decisions no 1.17 years. russia will not repeat it, and the special operations against

kievskiy him will be continued; the front will not collapse, so the front did not achieve any success, continued to function in the rhythm in which, uh, events are developing. lately. the so-called counteroffensive with the apu. of course, we cannot talk about a total failure, but we see that the promised results of the promised blitzkrieg. breakthrough to melitopol. there was no cutting of the land route to crimea and no clear successes ukrainian armed forces except tactical progress in some areas has not yet been reached. this is evidence of a fairly well-organized defense of the russian army, and uh, these defensive actions continued this active defense of the russian army and, uh, in the days of unrest it turns out, and on june 24 , you can talk a lot about the two poles, which essentially captured the information space, where realization on the one hand and betrayal on the other.

the message of the president is closer to me. the kind not from whom. about the fact that the situation was missed, it had to be solved earlier. well, the fact remains that attempts at rebellion in russia are still cases. here are the main conclusions that can and should be drawn by everyone. from this situation in my opinion, despite the fact that i previously made a reservation that some of the claims and grievances that were voiced by, uh, the public speakers of the rebels who spoke on behalf of the dude wagner really, probably, can be considered as a fair topic no less than no reasons, in the current conditions of which russia and our country is also our united fatherland, no reasons justify. this performance is not allowed. while the war is going on, the war is definitely going on, all internal disassemblies should be hidden under the carpet

is another matter. and that, of course, we watched with alarm the development of this public conflict between yevgeny prigozhny, as a spokesman for the opinion of the collective opinion, the advice of the commander. wagner is not such a simple structure as it seems to some, that there the decision is solely made by the hallway, but this is not so. so this is the public conflict between him and defense minister shoigu and the head general staff gerasimov attack on the leadership of the army. frank offensive means, uh, again, all of our military noted the following. well, you can treat the commander as you like, but only a superior boss has the right to dismiss and appoint him to a position. in this case , the head commander of the president of the russian federation, vladimir vladimirovich putin, everything else is an attempt

to influence the opinion of the commander using public political tools, we observed this situation in dynamics. and she led to the fact that this abscess. that is, pus just flowed from there, speaking in such medical terms, that is, in fact , here, metastases could go throughout russia if blood was shed , we know how a civil war begins, when the first shots are heard and then they are already fighting and for an idea because of a dead friend, and so on. still, dude wagner, to one degree or another, possessed the resources of up to 30,000 personnel of the transferred weapons equipment. moreover, these are military-trained people who took part in a special operation. on the territory of ukraine in the most difficult sectors of the front and in conflicts in african countries and other states. of course, this is a massacre. it would be merciless, very serious with unpredictable consequences, fortunately through the prompt intervention of two

presidents. uh, more have been prevented and we're on my mind. we are doing the right thing in our media, what to avoid? with harsh assessments, we give a legal qualification to what happened, we agree with the russian federation that it was an armed rebellion, but uh, the head of state absolutely right. yesterday i criticized the so-called hurray patriots. i didn’t see many of them on saturday in public space, but on sunday, when everything was resolved , people appeared who demanded blood of the head of utkin, the head of utkin well, yes, the rebellion could be resolved by two methods. the first is armed suppression. i'm not prepared to vouch for the consequences. and this would definitely be extremely detrimental to the fate of russia in the current situation. this is what the western enemies were waiting for, and the second is a compromise solution. it was found and compromise is always mutual concessions,

so, of course, there are no heroes in this situation. guilty to a greater extent, of course, uh, the side of the dude wagner, to a lesser extent, the ministry of defense of the russian federation but here, i mean , from the russian officialdom, it is necessary to carry out some work on the mistakes. first. you have created private military companies. it's not only wagner there are a lot of them there, but they forgot to outline for them the legal framework of the law no, what they can, what they can't, to whom they obey. on what grounds can their activities were terminated, and so on, and then, when you started trying to establish these right frames, it turned out that the child had already become a difficult teenager. and he does not want to obey these rules, which suddenly, uh, parents began to establish. you understand like this. this is the first, second. these are obvious problems with the image of a number of russian military leaders in the army and in the public field. yes, this is criticism, sometimes

unfair and not everyone sees the colossal work that, for example, was carried out by the minister of defense of the russian federation shoigu in that including in the context of negotiations on subsequent decisions on the deployment of tactical nuclear weapons in belarus, we know this work said, but if this kind of criticism is allowed, if this opinion is popular in russia, then it means that, accordingly, the flaws are underdeveloped. uh, the information service of the department of defense, which should be responsible for their membership and for them its leaders. so that is also a problem. and, of course, all the questions that were raised. uh, let's put it this way. hmm, during weiner's speech, they must analyzed on the subject of their relevance, i support absolutely that they should all be decided exclusively at the inner clan level without being carried out into personal space, because a good criterion

if it is beneficial to our enemies. this means that this is definitely bad and should not be exaggerated publicly. well here's something that should amplify an interesting observation. part of the officials of russia and a minimal part of the businessman and the scientific intelligentsia have spoken out. yes, but on the other hand , on june 24, the number of business jets flying from moscow increased instructed the national security commission of the state duma yes speaker volodin i think he wants to collect and publish this data absolutely reasonably . who speaks or behind those who are silent you know? of course, i expected

a more active and coherent position of a detachment of my acquaintances in politics, forming circles of the russian federation; at the same time, i would note the prompt reaction of president putin to the event, as well as what the head of state demonstrated as expected from he is a male character, yes, in the qualification of what is happening, like an armed rebellion , they were waiting for this. that is, he showed that in the event of continued illegal actions. he is ready to go even according to the toughest scenario for the sake of ensuring the safety of the constitutional order. it means important. the moment that i personally always focus on and so far hmm, this approach has never failed me. so we need to focus on our leader, on alexander grigoryevich lukashenko, on his actions and assessment, so do not panic, do not hurry. uh, as in the video

of the legendary wick, it means to shout the guard or hurray, uh, when it seems like ours are being beaten, you need to figure it out, are ours ours or maybe ours are not ours, so there is no need to raise this panic. that's what you started sinning individual, including patriotic journalists, and the so -called opinion leaders, but certainly. eh, like any any shock reveals a strong weak side of a person. here. uh, as they say with whom you can go on reconnaissance? of course, individuals, uh earlier uh, who vomited fuck on their chest, being in a situation direct threat. e preferred. uh, that means , to leave the russian state, and just like that, with a shout, the guards rushed, uh, to yerevan in abu dhabi, uh, they buy tickets for 300,000 rubles. and, of course, those memes, uh, which

later on. after, when the situation was occupied , they spread over the internet when they said imagine the mood and face of those who are for 300,000 rubles. i flew from moscow to yerevan on this day, but of course, they have a place to be and, of course, from the point of view of the law, if these were not people, uh, on duty, who should have there is nothing to prosecute them for being at their workplace, but the society must. he probably knows exactly these heroes, so that later they could not claim that their opinion is some kind of value, which determines when making a decision of a strategic nature. we are with you. we are not trying to hype on this topic. just somewhere parallels with the twentieth year. with us, they are obvious, and perhaps that is why the topic is interesting and its development is interesting. let's get back to this issue, which actually worries a lot of belarusians, yes or at least until the president's meeting with

the security forces and journalists, he worried. prigozhin president of belarus this is what this is, if we assume the very presence of wagner here at least some of them but putin in his speech. he indicated that these are also patriots of russia and many of them have unconditional services to the country, they fought, they died and they solved the problems of russia. yes, first of all, our president, he denied the construction of camps specifically for them. yes, but he said that if necessary, we will help with accommodation and meet with the horseradish he raised a very interesting idea. what is such a colossal experience? like the wagnerites, yes, the belarusian military does not, and if they want to wash our army, then this will be an invaluable experience, but still, maybe you will expand

this question a little. what exactly can they help us with today, of course, and the nature of the dudes’ stay, the specifics of the functions that they will perform in the system of ensuring the national security of belarus, e, aspects of the probable cooperation, between our state and this private military company are negotiated. i know that not only prigozhin but also some commanders are on the territory of our country. this is an organization. i absolutely agree with you and president putin in that characterization of the personnel of which is the overwhelming majority. these are people who have merits before and these are people who shed blood for russia, by the way, certain successes are connected with them, which are not enough against the background. successful course of the special military operation, nevertheless

the russian army were achieved, including the capture. uh, the city of artyomovsk although some believe that this city was not of strategic importance, but nevertheless, uh, the battle that unfolded around artyomovskaya, it was on the front pages, uh, of all world publications. the fact that it was strengthened for 8 years suggests that it mattered in this battle as well. ah, the russian army. the watchdog element, which was precisely in the bakhman operation, was a private military company. well, the russian flag has won , and today it is warming in artyomovsk. that's of course, uh, even though we're still discussing that legal framework. e. within which our interaction will develop , i can say that wagner's experience in training the personnel of the belarusian armed forces in security, let our projects on

the african continent refrain from those aggressive aspirations. e our neighbors poland lithuania ukraine will be in great demand by the republic, belarus if we agree on the terms of interaction. this does not mean at all that all 25,000 wagners will come to our country. how many will be placed in belarus and so on is the subject of negotiations today. of course, we carefully analyzed those negative aspects. uh, it means the functioning of wagner in russia, of course , we are talking about some kind of political infrastructure. we deal with military matters. these must be military matters. well, the second. rather, even this is the first paramount legal framework, what can? what can't? where do we interact, and in what aspects does the republic of belarus prefer to cope on their own, here they have already begun, you know, idle discussions that they will protect storage facilities with nuclear weapons; we have enough people to guard

the storage facility, these are attack aircraft. these are, uh, people with a unique experience of fighting in dense urban areas, a security company. yes, and, of course, we will adopt all the best from them, and certainly take it into account. at the same time, all the risks that are associated with the placement of such units. these are from the state. there is monopoly violence. here is the key and precisely his state is exactly like this. the state is a monopoly. violence can delegate. but the overall control should remain with the state, a state within a state, as it was, unfortunately, in the russian federation , there will be no weddings here. ether 24/7 is a project in which within 20 minutes you will learn more about the key events of the past week that received the most

of your likes on our social networks. make exciting online trips to the most picturesque corners of belarus and make your own rating tv project in documentaries and serials to watch. watch us every friday night, before heading out on a trip, hosts answer questions about the destination and earn hints. no, if not love, then right, well, then the most

interesting name begins. bait on the hook, how do they say to catch a fish? well, big, big, really, now i understand how you are zoo tums. oh baby, i'm sorry to bother you. i need pillows and follow belarus with pleasure and see the project stone, paper scissors on our tv channel. well, you just need to draw conclusions. this is one of those conclusions that must be unambiguously implemented, e.g., implemented through specific regulatory documents. if you do not create the rules of the game, yes, then do not be surprised that these rules are somehow violated. rather, their absence contributes to the disruption

of the moment, because the united states is excited . yes, they would like wagner to be rudely dissolved and cease to exist throughout the world. yes, miller said so in my opinion, yes, an official representative of the state department, but you know what surprises me in the united states and britain are dozens of pmcs, and in the sixteenth, according to statistics , every fourth american who fought in afghanistan and iraq this was a representative of a private military company. if there were hundreds of thousands of them. let's count how many dudes were there, but there is another moment right there, poland. you correctly indicated that when we talk about what will be strengthened, the defense capability of belarus was very excited. everywhere and marawiecki really excited, yes, and they have already begun to talk about the need to strengthen the eastern flank.

if we go back to miller, why exactly did he and precisely our musicians care so much, but it is quite obvious that it is, uh, the anglo-saxons who are, in general, the creators of the concept of private military companies, here, uh, in this regard, hmm , this toolkit was used quite effectively by them. ensuring that the global dominance of the collective west well, which has been observed in the world in recent decades. that's honestly military campaigns protected their commercial projects, overthrew, objectionable regimes provided armed intervention in those countries that they considered necessary to subject to aggression. well, when wagner appeared, i did not understand that there was a competitor in this field and quite effective. and to say that wagner actually squeezed the french out of africa, here, working in the national interests of russia china by the way, they have contacts with this country and, in the end, in the interests of those african governments that wished

would distance themselves from the former european colonialists, and, in general, independently try to exploit their rich natural resources. uh, that's why the americans are very concerned, of course, the existence of wagner, they recognized this organization as a threat to national security. i am very much concerned, but by the wagner factor, including the possible possible legalization of this structure in our country by the french, because wagner struck simply palpable. uh, damaging the image of france as a power influencing african affairs. and also due to the use of the famous foreign legion , simply put, here in the vernacular they slammed on there in africa by this frenchman, and of course, uh, the french leader macron. uh, here, uh , quite, let's say, but offended and infringed by wagner and in every possible way, uh, trying to lobby,

uh, and decision-making. uh, that means, uh, prohibiting the activities of this organization in russia, and here, through various channels , they are planting something, supposedly a threat. we have to be careful, which means they can arrange something in minsk that we don’t need to tell us about in moscow. here we are let's agree on them. these are our russian people, but, of course, we understand the rules of the game. uh, what i understand is, uh, playing with matches, and matches are not a toy for children. there is no need to be childish about this, and then everything will be in order. everything will be within the framework of the field and in the context of the national interests of the republic of belarus, look, after all, against this background, there were talks again, when the rebellion was over, yes, during the day of the foundation, there were conversations and expert comments about

peace in ukraine and the west, all our attempts all minsk attempts at the president's attempts and initiatives are called imitation. but you must admit that the price of this imitation is hundreds of thousands of human lives that could have been saved. and more can be saved. how high is the likelihood of new minsk agreements already against this background, characterizing the policy. e of the collective west and their leaders i will say. so it may not be diplomatic, cynical scoundrels cynical scoundrels were stopped in belarus in 2014. bloodbath, which then we still have us in ukraine unfortunately, uh, minsk the agreements that were signed were considered in the collective west, and they admitted this to us documented. everything, nobody hides anything anymore.

they were considered as a kind of delayed decision to prepare the ukrainian army for a war against russia. that's exactly what it looked like. so they are now proudly admitting that they signed and were not going to comply. what are such people called, everyone can answer for himself, but we were justifiably proud that in 2019, thanks to the agreements signed on minsk land, thanks to the work of the tripartite contact group in donbas, not a single child has died in this osce. it was our pride. i know the mood of the belarusian diplomacy at this moment. so, as soon as the special military operation of the russian federation began, minsk offered its services as a negotiating platform and mediator of this conflict. we remember that several rounds of negotiations took place on belarusian soil and decisions, as they say on the table , it could save hundreds of thousands of lives, ukrainians and russians, if we are talking about

ukraine is primarily ukrainians, because it was ukraine that withdrew from the negotiation process. and who pushed the kiev regime to these actions, of course, in the first place. e, a columnist for the now british newspaper johnson , who at that time owed the polish president from the british prime minister. duda, or rather, all this triumite kachinsky duda maravitsky, dreaming of some territorial acquisitions in the east, including on our territory, rats in skhodnya do not allow pan kachinsky to sleep, means and, of course, e. us leaders are the top of the democratic party and the eternally sad seam from which, too, no one will ever remove the historical guilt for his action. and germany is a separate conversation. here are the fascist crosses on the tanks. yes, but in german, but at the same time, from the point of view of political economy, this is a victim of this war, because germany is being undressed, and he does not understand this, but either he understands this, and

therefore he is so sad, but certain obligations that put pressure on him make him walk this apocalyptic path together with the state entrusted to him. that's why the cynical scum who ignited the flames of this war. she was beneficial to them until recently. this is now, when it began to burn, western technology stock e, the leading manufacturers of the military-industrial complex of the western countries crawled down. for now. it was profitable a huge amount of money was stolen from the so-called aid to ukraine well , now i think so, they want to steal for restoration. i have already spoken somewhere in russian programs. what about drug rehabilitation? often more profitable business than the drug trade, and moreover , it sounds euphonious, that is, not a weapon. ukraine is pumping up, we are restoring it, but i tend to think. uh, nevertheless, that this is a window of opportunity that opens after the ukrainian counter-offensive, apparently, after all, unsuccessful hmm for the time being, uh,

it is not fully disclosed. we haven't seen it yet. uh, so setting up with fighters at 16 should be some more airfighting . in my opinion. i think that they will be the same as with the vaunted leopards yesterday, in my opinion, turkish experts have published the amount of equipment destroyed, not the russians, but the turks published only leopards. uh, over 40 have already been destroyed. well , what they read, but china, yes, a great power, of course, and its opinion means, including in e, therefore the conflict, therefore the bear cub. he gave his assessment in their opinion that the end of the rebellion in such a short time actually strengthened the authority of the putin administration and showed the strength of the russian leader. will such a political consolidation around putin give

him the opportunity for sharper, like military, as well as political action. you started with turkish intelligence. rather, from turkish experts. he understands that it is honestly connected and yet the definition of turkish intelligence is one of the strongest in the world. and turkey, which is trying to work within the framework of its policy of ad hoc alliances in the context of the conflict in ukraine, maintains close relations with both sides. uh-huh , respectively, has the ability to obtain objective information about the situation on the battle line. contacts. here. eh, of course leopards patriots, there are all other equipment. eh, on the one hand it is not necessary. ah. it means falling into such a propaganda frenzy. as some colleagues do and say that we are here, it means we will throw nonsense at them with hats, this technique is good, it is technically effective, but still not in vain. uh, the russian soviet military school and military industrial complex is considered one

of the best in the world for every technique. there is another technique, as he said, molotov, on the right bomb of one side, there will be a nuclear bomb of another country. and one more thing you know, it's just not a super weapon. yes, not the wunderwaffe, you understand, they are also on fire and will also be destroyed. a russian soldier will hammer them, and even using the same cornet tours, for example, and this was clear, in general, to all a people more or less versed in military specifics. but uh, back to your question. about china means, er, of course, the chinese draw conclusions. uh, about the stability of russian statehood and the institution of presidential power, based on the events that have taken place. did vladimir tremble putin did e for vibrate. uh, the representatives of the elites are not the bourgeois layer that tried to drop there from moscow and bought tickets to yerevan, but really there are governors. uh, the military is very bureaucratic. no, they all rallied

around the president. and one more important point. e mediation of belarusian. in this case, the leader lukashenko acted in the context of his concept and worldview of a single fatherland , two states, one fatherland, so the president did. he designated, moreover, specifically from brest to vladivostok and acted hand on hand with putin certainly. it was a synchronous plan and the president revealed. how communications developed between him, putin and prigozhin , it was clear that our united fatherland has a fairly strong managerial vertical headed by experienced leaders from the other side. for me. this was also very important and maybe even somewhat unexpected. eh, it’s still clear that the president has gone through this solid soviet school, including the party school. remember the criticism of self-criticism, the basis of party discipline, without telling what we were good, tell us what was bad. and

when the head of state said that putin and i do not relieve ourselves of responsibility for the situation. we saw her. we discussed it and did not stop it in time. it was also costly. so he took on this responsibility, including, of course, when some begin to talk about heroism. uh, there is one or another leader , the president himself pulled them, he says there are no heroes in this story. somewhere we missed this outbreak, but then it was localized. china appreciates it all wise. china, uh, are connected with us with a system of strategic partnership agreements from russia to belarus, which is watching attentively and benevolently. you are watching this fight, which is unfolding on the territory of ukraine , because the chinese definitely stand on the positions of a multipolar world. they understand that if russia loses, the entire post-soviet space will catch fire, it will be difficult for them. after all,

the states. this is the only power that, without hiding in its documents, describes measures of containment in the development of certain states. in this case, of course, their strategic opponent is china , they say that we will take measures aimed at weakening china. in this situation, too. naturally, china will, but build constructive relations with the russian federation and, of course, with the republic, belarus, the significance of which , in fact, i will utter this thought, because i am reproached there for a certain, perhaps overly patriotic position. but this is my assessment. this is not a citizens' appraisal. this is an analyst's assessment of the importance of belarus geopolitical the significance of belarus greatly exceeds the scale of our country and its resource potential. we have repeatedly demonstrated this when we intervened.

in a positive sense, in a crisis after space, and here in this mediation is a distinctive feature of belarusian diplomacy , which has developed over 30 years, while we have the current leader in our country , you asked a question about tactical nuclear weapons at a meeting with the president. the key question , in fact, the president emphasized that a significant part is already in belarus. this the situation is very strained our closest neighbors. yes, marowiecki said that poland well , in this situation, in principle, yes, it should strengthen the borders there. i'm not talking about the fact that they were ready to host nuclear weapons, yes, and they openly declared this, the united states well, let's let go. it's like a seemingly insignificant detail. but still , is it possible to say that everyone in our country understands

the importance of this step on the part of the president? for the preservation of the country and what prevents individuals from understanding this sergeevich, but i do not agree with the fact that that we will omit the story that poland declared its readiness to deploy american lake weapons, because it was these declarations of the polish leadership that were the most weighty argument when the constitutional commission, which included your humble servant, through long discussions on this subject, excluded from the new edition of the main the law of the country is the norm without nuclear status. uh-huh, we thought that it would be illiterate to impose some kind of restrictions on ourselves to narrow our capabilities. let's just say the protection of the country in a world that is rapidly acquiring more and more aggressive features around us , and in this regard, these changes were strategically significant and

subsequently, as the development of historical events showed, uh, correct, and the fact that the people supported us in this regard shows the maturity of the belarusian society. so, as far as their fears are concerned, they have nothing to fear. we do not attack anyone in the same constitution, the republic of belarus has pledged not to wage an aggressive war with its territory nuclear weapons means of ensuring our security means of deterring those madmen who would like to repeat the forty -first year, if our society is still. there are people who do not understand in what direction, unfortunately, the world is moving. so, when the word of the old world order happens, but the new one has not yet arisen, but they can just look at the situation in ukraine, the war is next to the second question that i will ask. yes , many of us go to poland and i went until the moment they imposed

sanctions against me, well, until 2020. we treat our neighbors well. we still keep for them a visa-free regime. we are peaceful people are the first lines of our national anthem no one believes in the possibility of war ask a question. and why the fuck and progressively increase their military spending, well, the vedic army is planning twice. why do they have a 2023 military budget of 21.5 billion euros? i will not voice. our budget, but i can tell you that this is much less money and we understand that there is a neighbor periodically aiming at us from a gun, then he probably has not the best intentions and not to get involved in this race armaments, because the military insist on parity, you understand the military, they argue

by departmental interests, to them. the homeland obliged us to protect, they say, and we will not be able to protect you, because there are more weapons there, there are 500 modules for the highmoros. only now it is ordering south korean tanks, helicopters, planes, artillery, all this is aimed at us, new units are being created. army. doubled to 330,000 people. our military come and say, we will not be able to resist them, we need a symmetrical response. a symmetrical answer has been found. is it in vain that we entered into allied relations with that superpower that is called the russian federation, is it in vain with us. common fatherland , a union state, our russian allies helped us. yes, now in the west they have the main question. but how is it that the belarusians probably won’t give you some algorithms, something else the president clearly said everything, yes, legally, this weapon will be russian we will be handed over everything and do not doubt that if you climb here again , kill our people burn them in

outbuildings in churches in houses. how did they do it? the civilized west is also the idea of ​​expanding the german living space. it is not clear who is not germany exactly. they are from birth, supposedly inferior, all of this was and now it is just in other words hiding behind, how to understand europe was sick , the russian garden around the jungle and other things , these pan-european er, ideas of superiority. but as soon as you poke your head you will get a decent answer. you know, i immediately liked the president that we have been living in peaceful. in a peaceful independent belarus, due to the fact that every day we are preparing for war, only therefore, how are we going to save ourselves parabellum it was not we who came up with absolutely wisdom, which was formulated by the ancients and the chech of the world, therefore we act absolutely right. we are strengthening the defense capability of our state. you know , you can't forget about our vultures.

yes, the fugitives turned to the security forces to expel the russian army from our country before that. as you remember, they called for a general break with russia of all economic ties and to protect fence. will the west feed us? well, it’s true, it’s more than brad, it’s hard to come up with, but that’s what hope they have behind all this. marat sergeevich here it is necessary to understand to whom these statements were addressed. and in general, uh, at what point in the worldview are the domestic fugitives, they are 3 years, how divorced from the belarusian reality. they are completely financially dependent on external control centers. they are under the operational control of foreign intelligence services , some are double or even triple

agents. here in this regard. eh, first of all, there is a loss of real perception of the world. they don’t know what’s going on here, because only a person who doesn’t understand anything about belarusian affairs at all can turn to the security forces with a demand. it means to take up arms against our russian allies. yes , this is on the one hand, but on the other hand , did they contact the axiloviks or was it just another demonstration of loyalty? those western structures for the maintenance of which they are and they said what they want to hear from them, maybe be, and that was the main driving motive. on the one hand. yes, this pool was called there, which is not a regiment in ukraine. there was a company, there 100 people called to block the entire perimeter of the belarusian russian border. this is such a loud call, and behind it was read, give a penny. give us a cap of pennies for what we want to eat. that's the thing, and there is a delicious fire just try and see.

that's what they were talking about, and that's the main leitmotif of all the political work, it's clear that hmm a lot of grief. they bring our people by their calls for sanctions by their betrayal. e with all sorts of small dirty tricks on the one hand on the other hand. we are fortunate that such politically and personally worthless people lead these radical politicized ones. grouping sticks dug-in abroad last about philosophical questions we are traditionally talking on the eve of the country's main holiday of independence on the third of july. here, how do you think on the eve of july 3, three years later. in a country that has retained independence and sovereignty, those same people with bright faces

, some of whom fled at last, realized that 3% is about them. i will also answer philosophically asshole language. maybe somewhere, uh, in my opinion, the information hygiene and political literacy of our society has increased significantly at the same time , just as it was wrong from the outside. so- called incredible consider that the supporters of the president 3%. so we should not think that only 3% of those who, to one degree or another, do not share the goals of our state policy. u not so long ago 23 june was another anniversary of hmm the legendary first round of the presidential elections in 1994, where alexander grigoryevich lukashenko got me remembering more than 45% of the votes. in the first turkish. in the first round. in the first round, the society then supported the young president, who came with a program to take the people away from the abyss, and

he carried out this program, which means that at the same time, shushkevich’s poznyak scored more than twenty percent for two, when i looked at the data for 2020, uh, a woman now, hiding in vilnius a few alternative candidates and candidates against all together also scored about 20% this does not mean at all that all these people are our political opponents. this or that degree of opposition is often inherent in many, this is not opposition in relation to strategic issues of power. this is dissatisfaction with some local problems in time, unresolved. a certain feeling, resentment is electorally infantilism, there can be many different reasons, here , of course, there were much fewer specific violators of the law, but no less, these figures show that there is still something to work on in terms of enlightenment of our citizens in terms of hmm, let's say so. uh, creating adequate party ideological platforms for them. now there is

a reformatting of the party sector in belarus so that, on the one hand, people have freedom of choice, and on the other hand, this choice. e. it was made taking into account those goals of the sovereign development of the republic of belarus , which are to ensure peace stability, democracy, e-e economic growth. that's what makes up the image future for our country. this is especially important in the conditions when we are witnesses and direct participants in the destruction of the old world order and belarus is unfortunately considered in this geopolitical struggle. e, as one of the chess cells, and quite significant from the point of view of occupying this position, and here we must defend our perimeter, firstly, a. secondly, practice has shown. e, of course, e to be a factor of stability for our common fatherland to support the supporting

structure, which is russia. are the working days of belarusians? there is only one method, because you need to work to work. that is, how an athlete will do his best, how an athlete will give himself up in training, that is, this will be the result, when you come to work in civil aviation, you become attached to your soul and body. she becomes part of her life. our task is to make your trip comfortable and safe. representatives of various fields of activity will tell you about the features of their profession. well here's to find some common language to have you the athlete understood why he comes to training? why is he doing anything at all? you have learned it. this is explained from here in the event of

a power outage. no, but it will continue to work, because you can watch the movement in the project one day on our creative tv channel. also in belarus i believe that she is one of the most promising future ballerinas, gifted, brave , always ready to master a new direction, conquer stages and exhibition space, she easily masters the soft material of glider, we have seen her work, she is excellent pastel. uh, sepia, let's share a story about their creative path with all the successes and failures and daily work on themselves complex movements that are very difficult for her, because thin legs are long, when long levers are very difficult to control them

, it will work to do this, and the new generation of belarusians. watch in the project new

people on belarus 24 tv channel. saturday broadcast on belarus 1 continues the news of the afternoon in the studio of vladislav bundare. hello, and here's what we'll tell you about the releases of 1000 detainees, hundreds of crippled, burned at home, and cars cannot be counted, and