further labor there were no windows, no doors, no roofs. we had to fight for this castle peace on earth is unthinkable without historical memory, and creation is the continuity of the historical path. this is the step of the future. the belarusian who changed the future of europe as a deal of the century influenced the formation of the european union the wild map of germany why the industrial power of the state went into decline along with the resignation of angela merkel and missed a kilo, who is building a new empire on the ruins of russia moscow berlin paris great romania why are they forming a system of checks and balances in the intermarium project europe of different speeds contour maps change their color trends,

700 km and 33 years long from the berlin wall to the polish fence, how we ended up on a new round of the cold war, who is behind this and where the world is heading, in which we live will we figure it out together? the berlin wall, as a symbol of the confrontation between two civilizations , has long been taken apart for souvenirs, separate fragments, generally installed as art objects throughout the european union. edification to posterity, and not the admissibility of escalation and confrontation in europe, as the time of a separate policy showed , national interests turned out to be deaf and short-sighted, gave way to personal ambitions, and the walls themselves began to build significantly the east of their german. maman , the confrontation line came close to the belarusian border and this happened long before 2014. i absolutely agree with

president putin when he says that we did not start this war. it started, not even in the fourteenth year. she started long before 2014. we saw everything that happened here, the brown coup that took place, we saw what ukraine is being led to, we saw who was in the forefront of the options, there were many options for people to live peacefully in ukraine throughout ukraine but not the former yanukovych there and poroshenko and the current zelensky why didn’t they use it? why didn't they use it? did they want war? no, they were simply pushed to this by the ukrainian crisis. indeed, not the root cause, but a consequence of the destabilization of the region , dozens of western factories of thought worked on what it used to sound like some conspiracy theory today has concrete factual

evidence. the main foreign policy interests of the united states throughout the past century during the first and second and cold world wars concentrated on the relationship between russia and germany because, united, they are the only force that poses a vital threat to the united states. and our main task was to prevent their union. the second world war really had a chance to put an end to any constructive dialogue between russia and germany paid too high a price for achieving peace in europe. however, the renaissance of diplomatic relations began already in 1955. during the visit of konrad. adenauer, a groundwork was laid in moscow for the start of full-scale economic cooperation. a few years later, the issue of gas supplies to germany entered the agenda of bilateral relations . sleepless nights began

. soviet gas excluded american coal from the equation; diameter in 1962 broke the deal. however, despite the unleashed gas war and the regen sanctions. in 1970, the deal of the century was signed, gas pipes were already in 1973. the first soviet gas came to germany during the cold war, the united states and the secular union entered into a series of economic and political battles, and one of the most significant was struggle for control over the oil and gas market in the fifties and sixties, the ussr rapidly expanded its oil production and exports. what invariably caused concern to american oil companies of politicians feared that the supply of soviet oil, which was beneficial to european buyers, would become a political and economic victory for communism and deal a crushing

blow to american industry, despite the fact that the united states themselves sought to impose a capitalist system where the strongest should survive. let others play by these rules, and the one who invented them has the right to neglect them. isn't it, therefore, in the way of the face , the americans imposed economic sanctions on the goods necessary for construction gas pipelines, pipes with a large radius and the power of the turbine, there were none in the union, and therefore, in order to speed up construction, it was necessary to purchase everything from european partners european countries whose companies expressed a desire to supply large-diameter pipes successfully lobbied for the removal of bans on the export of such products to the ussr introduced by a specially created anti-communist committee. however, the united states did not make concessions to european countries, the ban on the supply of oil and gas equipment to the soviet union was approved

during the caribbean crisis, all contracts were terminated by the soviets. of course, the interests of western european companies suffered, but the states only benefited from this in the sixty-ninth year , the minister of foreign affairs of the ussr, our compatriot andrei gromyko, offers the frg and other european countries the supply of soviet gas in exchange for their pipes and oil and gas equipment, the barter scheme did not formally violate the restrictions existing at the moment in the boom. the soviet proposal was accepted positively and in february of the seventieth year moscow and germany sign a contract under the gas pipe formula soon, not only german, but also british french and italian companies began working on similar terms with the participation of their own banks thanks to this scheme, in the early eighties , the construction of the world's first transcontinental gas pipeline urengoy pomary uzhgorod began at first united states did not oppose cooperation along

the gas pipeline. in order not to escalate tension between political camps. however, after the coming to power of ronald, reagan eighty-first united states. again began to actively restrict the soviet energy sector through the provision of loans for gas projects. the same french considered the ussr a reliable partner and provided loans at seven and eight percent per annum, although western borrowers were given courts no less than under. yes, and among reagan's advisers were less bellicose , who believed that imposing restrictions on beneficial cooperation between the soviet union and europe would lead to significant conflict between the united states and european countries and the latter simply refuse to comply with the requirements of the united states, but the imposition of martial law in poland in 1981 allowed reagan to impose large-scale sanctions against the ussr, including a ban on the supply of oil and gas equipment for

the urengoy gas pipeline. in the second year, germany france great britain italy declares us sanctions illegal and resumes deliveries of oil and gas equipment to the ussr washington failed to convince its european allies that cooperation with moscow undermines their energy security. i had to take it off. the ban on the supply of his political adventure began to turn into tangible self-harm in the period 45 to 91 , the us european allies did not initiate western sanctions against the energy sector of the soviet union, they only joined them, often under strong pressure from the states. decades later , a major european gardener admits that

the well-being of the eurozone was based on cheap energy from russia germany received not only an incentive for the development of its own industry and the strengthening of the economy , the position of the gas hub made it possible to sew together the disparate countries of europe, the unity provided by subsidies in alliance with france berlin ensured the adoption of the necessary laws and regulated the entire development of the eurozone. frau. merkel for a long time. she successfully balanced within the union and fended off foreign policy challenges. she perfectly understood the role and significance that the established axis moscow berlin paris germany and merkel became the wild map of europe, obviously this was the reason for the scandal with sworn partners in 2013. it turned out that the united states was tapped by phones as far back as 2002, while in the position of federal chancellor. consistently defended national interests. here is an example of her statement in 2016 . i stand for the gradual convergence

of russia with the european economic space, so that in the end we will have a single economic zone from lisbon to vladivostok similar development events not only contrary to us interests in the region, the alliance of germany and russia challenges american hegemony, it is about the formation of a new center of power, which would not just have to be reckoned with. and perhaps even listen to the recommendations. at the same time , merkel was not limited to economic cooperation with russia in 2014, at her suggestion , jean-claude became the chairman of the european commission. juncker a year later, in the cozy hands of frau merkel, he throws heavily american military bases in the european union, how do you like this statement? the common european army showed to the world that such an army would never again be at war between eu member states. it would help us implement a common foreign and security policy.

realize the responsibility of europe in the world subtle trolling in diplomatic language provides for a gradual bias away from nato towards a sovereign european army sounds like decoupling of the european union further more such statements began to be heard at official events from merkel eland, and more and more often with the mention of independence from the united states boiling point, after which the lid lifted in the white house there was a statement about the withdrawal of american nuclear weapons from germany, and the european trend for sovereignty will talk with a member of the bundestag from the alternative for germany party hello eugene since 2017 in germany they have been actively discussing the withdrawal of american nuclear weapons. why with the coming to power of scholz? the topic has left the german agenda. i think, after all, the matter is not so much in the scholts as in the foreign policy situation, that is, now during the ukrainian armed conflict. uh,

naturally, no one this question uh, among the ruling german circles will not be raised, that is, the united states, on the contrary, predicted its position in europe, that is, its dominant position. and now, uh, let's just say no one dares to question american interests on german soil, so the conclusion. uh, bass with atomic weapons here in germany is not on the agenda yet. well, i think in the near future eugene will not stand in your opinion. what consequences could the formation of its own army in the european union lead to? does this initiative go against the interests the united states in europe in this regard is worth noting. uh, the creation of interethnic brigades. uh, that is , there is german-french there or there is, in my opinion, german in and so on. uh, it was all let's say. so trial balloons in the sense that it was once planned to nevertheless take a step and create their own army, the eu

is natural. it all went, let's say, against the interests of the one that, as a military bloc, dominates europe, er, because the united states feared that with the creation of full-fledged armed forces, the european union, uh, will gain more independence from us interests in europe, so this kind of attempt. they have not led to any significant global success. and now, during the ukrainian conflict, it should be noted that the united states has its own positions in europe to the maximum extent possible, and today no one even stutters about creating their own army, on the contrary. let's say everyone swears allegiance to the nato bloc by all means, that is, they try to fulfill the requirements. about the fact that at least 2% of the gross national product should be spent on defense, uh, and so on and so forth further, that is, it was the united states

that used this conflict to strengthen its positions of its interests. uh, in europe he was embroiled in a large-scale corruption scandal , in your opinion, the kumax case can be an instrument of pressure on a key german politician. hamburg that is, when he is after a meeting with the leadership of one of the private banks. uh, he was allowed not to pay state huge fines. also, already in his tenure as minister, minister of finance. there was also a huge scandal. uh, when one of uh one so from concerns, that is, large financial concerns declared bankruptcy. eh, and it turned out that the scholz department , which was supposed to, let's say, control the activities of this

concern and financial fraud , was opened in time, and they simply missed all those billions in withdrawals from foreign accounts that the concern had been managing for several years. that is, by for some reason, it was all closed eyes. that is, these kinds of incidents are, uh, they are characteristic of scholz, but again , this is all characteristic of german politics. we also know in the case of mrs. fondalai, who will be minister of defense in her own way. e germany caused damage to its department in the amount of hundreds of millions of euros. there were some pretty murky schemes. by advisers. one can only assume that in certain circles, maybe overseas exists, of course. this is se on politicians in order to have leverage over them

solution germany has not yet investigated the nord stream terrorist line closed the last nuclear power plant in the country the imbalance of energy security is gradually leading to industrialization, in your opinion, do these processes correspond to the national interests of germany naturally, the disruption of the nord stream was the most serious terrorist attack against national infrastructure for the entire recent history of germany and the fact that for eight months the investigation did not move the dead point suggests that in fact the ruling political elites. there is no desire to complete this investigation. and the fact that e american journalist all mukhish published his calculations on the incident, on the basis of which norway and the united states carried out a terrorist attack. uh, against uh, like germany's gas pipeline infrastructure uh, it was all there right away, like a conspiracy theory and without any meaning. the recession of the german economy

ruled out the opportunity to generously subsidize the members of the european union and maintain mythical unity. poland immediately lost economic interest in such a union to leave a ship going into recession interferes with the opinion of ordinary poles most citizens see their future as part of the european union trying to rectify the situation by artificially forming points of tension in warsaw claiming germany's plans to return their former lands within poland while actively raising the issue of new payments of reparations for the period world war ii refusal, as a reason for public insult and justification of a legitimate decision for citizens , the dudemar regime already sees poland as a new regional leader. all gas arteries lead to warsaw after a series of failures in attempts to drag the flows

of russian blue fuel to bypass ukraine over the polish sky, at last. the stars aligned, the country seeks to become a distribution center for the supply of liquefied natural gas to the countries of central eastern europe, a sign was the opening on september 27 last year of the valtik-pipe gas pipeline, which brings norwegian gas to the country, coincidence or not, but this happened in unison with the terrorist attacks on september 26 on nord stream . naturally. after the destruction of the russian gas pipelines , the position of the previous gas leader of europe , germany, was greatly shaken, which gave the green light to the hyenas of europe today. we can say with full confidence that the era of russian domination. in the gas sector , an era marked by blackmail, threats and extortion is coming to an end. at the beginning of october, pumping began through a new gas pipeline from norway to poland, which is in transit. through the building, the volume

of pumping will be about 10 billion cubic meters per year. warsaw has never stated that since this pipeline will replace the russian gas, however, the maximum capacity of the baltic pipe is six times lower than the nord stream , and analysts believe that the launch of a new gas pipeline is unlikely to affect world gas prices as well as blue fuel quotes in europe, but dashing, trouble, beginning wasting no time in the same month , the lithuanian and polish gas transmission system operators successfully tested at full capacity the hippul gas pipeline, which was put into operation in may 2022. the fuel artery provides access to liquefied gas from a floating terminal in klaipeda, which warsaw will be able to import via gas pipeline and tankers. a little earlier, as if knowing the future ahead of time. a gas pipeline was launched connecting the gas transmission systems of poland and slovakia . the gas river is designed to provide access to

warsaw supplies from the southern gas corridor from the adriatic sea region, and slovakia will become more accessible than lng arriving in poland from its birthplace. all in the same norway stopped only on underground highways, warsaw does not intend to polish oil and gas concern. orlen. plans to create its own gas fleet already this year, the company expects two south korean tankers to transport liquefied natural gas, and by the end of 2025 the number of such gas carriers will reach eight, of course, the development of the country's gas potential has its own strategic goal. poland should soon become a superpower in europe and by 2030 surpass the uk in economic terms, borszawa seeks to strengthen its military capabilities and have the best ground potential.

european members of nato, the goal of strengthening influence and future dominance in the region, and everything starts with the language already now kiev does not exclude the possibility of including the polish language in the list of subjects required for admission to universities and for integration into the european education area with the inclusion of ukraine through poland in the legal economic social the space of europe , but without granting the rights of european citizens in ukraine and the ukrainian political elites of european political rights, then everyone will become poles. well, in what way civil news, as it were, yes civil yes, civil yes, probably, very likely , yes, keep up with the ukrainians and the balts , the prime minister of lithuania said that the teaching of russian as a second foreign language in lithuanian schools can be replaced by polish and this, despite the fact that according to according to the lithuanian ministry of education, the russian language. as a second foreign language, it still remains

the most popular in schools. polish ambitions are supported by funding from the outside, the whole country is an instrument of struggle between the us and the uk that left the eu against united continental europe strong euro a threat to the dollar washington has one task to maintain its competitive niche or at least slow down its further contraction. to do this, it is necessary to remove the european competitor. poland, as an instrument of anti-european policy, fits perfectly with all its fears and grievances , it is quite simple to interest it. giving money by promising the role of germany in the energy supply of europe plus half of ukraine to boot. more and more often theses are heard, it is a growing systemic crisis in the european union one of the unbending european politicians remains viktor orban. the hungarian prime

minister turned brussels on the national interests, unlike the other players in the unity, he speaks openly about the problems of the european union here , for example, is an excellent quote. the modern form of european cooperation has been driven by two missions, peace and prosperity, if the union cannot fulfill its two original missions. then what is the point of its existence? europe ceased to exist for the benefit of the national interests of the united states, the ukrainian case was fully played out after the merkels left the stage, the convenient chancellor scholz with a criminal case behind him, where he should be silent, where they would say merkel leaves john at one time perfectly understood what the proliferation of a large-scale conflict would lead to in europe and against whom is it directed? yes, today you have to sing along, according to the conjuncture. otherwise, a calm pension can end quickly, but it was they who

occupied the crisis on the minsk agreements magazine o'key in 2014. we helped bring down viktor yanukovych, who was democratically elected president. we spent 5 billion dollars there in ukraine to get rid of him, then we installed a government that we personally prepared in 2 months. before that, and the first thing the new government did. it adopted serious repressive laws on donbass a. then she savagely attacked. on them. killing 14,000 people. for several years, this war did not start in february 2022. it started in february 2014. in fact, the younger one could tell we have much more interesting facts. the fact is that ukraine as a field for confrontation with russia was considered by the united states at the academic level, the strategy of action has been repeatedly worked out in the framework of staff exercises of the current events. in soviet times , they discussed at the level of the obvious incredible.

i know, here recently, in one of the american academy, headquarters exercises were held and there , uh, hypothetical 2.000 some twenty -fifth year, the situation is being developed that russia america is at war with two states, china and russia and the cause of the war, just that that ukraine started a war with russia on the side of nato the fact is that the american partners began to strangle ukraine in their arms right at the parade of sovereignties, the soviet nomenclature was already closely intertwined with the radical nationalists red-brown, the tandem loudly slamming the soviet door tried to take the black sea with them fleet, a persistent attempt was made to leave under the jurisdiction of the new state all the troops deployed on the territory of ukraine actions of ukraine in relation to, let's say, the soviet army and navy - this is an action that poses a colossal threat to all of humanity as a whole, and therefore it is quite possible here

for them to hold a certain international conference of negotiations, er, related. uh, let's say under the auspices of the united nations with the participation of the leading countries of the world in order to work out certain mutually acceptable solutions. i am opposed to settling any territorial conflicts by force. there should be negotiations here, but this should not be missed. time must not be allowed to, uh, ukraine has already created such an army that, if she creates, she will certainly use. i do not doubt this for a minute and i believe that today we are laying a minute for not only our future, but also the future of all mankind. washington was systematically moving towards its goal of destroying the geostrategic balance in the region, which was established between the soviet union and the united states, the system was based on

clear international agreements, while in 2001, us president george w. american missile defense systems began to be built in poland and romania, the main subtlety is that the systems can be used not only for protection, but also for missile launches against the enemy , the only difficulty that arises in this situation is the range of missiles to a certain extent by developing tests short-range medium-range missiles were limited by the oder smd agreement in 2019, the united states withdrew from the treaty and began testing medium-range missiles previously prohibited by the treaty. but i'm afraid that the americans will take advantage of the moment to thwart this treaty and place missiles in europe, it ’s not enough here. therefore,

together with russia, we need to think about retaliatory measures, there is no getting away from this. if this happens, and it will be even worse. naturally. these missiles will be deployed. god forbid well, hypothetically so far on the territory of ukraine i am categorically against it, we are supporters of a peaceful policy. we do not need these showdowns of large states, from which as a result of these showdowns. we are always based on stories. we have always suffered. it seems to me that at least the north atlantic alliance declares that they are not going to allow these missiles in europe. uh, i think it's just a bluff, they set up their lives in the village. so any city dweller can envy the raccoons, as if in this whole self. well, why will he behave himself well?

except for me, deer are all named. and here is our song. and there is a deer. we have vasya and we have vasya, you will feed the combatants, the leader from the capital will have to learn everything the delights of rural life, well, they said they had an excursion and now they have to work. oh how he doesn't want to. with the right one, i’ll decide everything, you won’t cut it like that. we will calculate. i understand, the main thing is not to cut off the ear of everything else. i have little interest in the project. i am from the village, so that a person who understands business, and therefore has a firm decision and a strong will. he knows exactly what awaits him ahead, but here, but this is pure water, adventure romanticism. well then, they are so interesting. watch to live without on tv channel belarus 24.

belarusian doylidism and i’m somehow i walk right over the dokhetakhsha suwabat in his voice and most of the knowers of the temple, and the call, but granted. uh, not only a fragment of columns with squares, but also niches in such niches they set, but sculptures. which ones to break through? hurray, but significant cultural objects on the map of ukraine could not be cultural and svetnitsky project architecture of belarus belarusian architecture is sacred architecture and it is ideally suited, just in this style there were more european lynxes from the landing, then just in the eighteenth stock. we have gained the upper hand. we

emotions came up. in order to give out something of your own and original, look at our tv channel. it is important to understand here that we are not talking about the classical occupation of europe or russia. everything is classic, divide rule, the main task is to prevent the formation of alliances that could challenge us hegemony weak scattered states in europe this is the main task for washington of the united states, the primary goal is to prevent russian capital and russian technologies, on the contrary, to german capital and german technology has merged with russia's natural resources and labor force in an unbeatable combination that the us is trying to keep out. it's been a whole century now. so how can this be achieved so that this russian

german combination does not take place. today , the united states has a trump card in this case, with which they will break such a combination, this line between the baltic states and the black sea. the line between the baltics and the black sea is the cordon sanitaire of britain the united states, while the sirs and peers prefer not to put all their eggs in one basket, in addition to playing on imperial ambitions in poland is undergoing an active revival of the project, greater romania is thus trying to create an alternative to the polish one between the sea and subsequently balance on the contradiction . one of the long-term tasks of britain is to secure the land border between romania and poland at the expense of ukrainian territories, which an ordinary person in our area knows of romania everyone remembers that stop. bender tried to take his treasures to brazil but had the stupidity to start moving to the place the final was somewhat predictable, because across the river

romania was waiting for him hello. romania i am an old professor who fled from the semi-basements of the moscow coinage to the first world war bucharest entered when the winner became obvious, it seemed like it was time to share the trophies, but the romanians had to be saved from defeat. this made the war longer by half a year and possibly led to the death of the russian empire during the second world war, the romanians fought, mainly with civilians and jews in the territories given by hitler. however, lost the war suddenly miraculously found themselves among the winners in general gave independence to the country. and why it grew with new territories after the constant defeats, no one knows. the readers of the golden calf are probably sure that great romania is a joke of ilf and petrov

. pitying the lives of strangers and, by the way, only strangers on the example of the absorption of moldova by romania - this is evident. best of all. here you can see the moldovan politics. didn't they offer to connect with motherland's mother united romania, european integration is a surrogate form of association with romania, even after joining the eu we remain four times poorer than romania in wages, pensions, scholarships , child benefits. we are four times behind romania in everything, and it remains the only way out, as soon as we are convinced of the next failure of the bet on the european union , salar, pensions, bursia, kirtuac, as it should be , patriots thief were fired from mayors because they are not clean at hand, but the arguments of the uniasts, he described from the exhaustive ones in the eu . it is not yet known when the money will be accepted. there may

do not give, romania here it is, unite even now exactly. romanians on the moldavian patriots have been talking for 30 years, but the result of the known unification is still somewhere far beyond the horizon. why yes, it's just that everyone who wanted to unite for a long time individually has a romanian passport. read every moldovan from the president to farm laborers, but many still have ukrainian and russian moldova has long turned into winter apartments , people earn money in moscow naples berlin kiev and build a house for grandchildren's children returning somewhere to balti or ryshkani to unite with romania means you and the poet choose the side of the iron curtain or patu, but there will remain on the other side, relatives, perhaps opportunities and, most importantly, money. therefore, among ordinary moldovans, there are always slightly fewer unionists than supporters of independence among politicians. however, also in romania , moldovans are treated with arrogance by rank and

rank. after the unification, a few bessarabians will receive. and so chisinau politicians have let it be small, but its own country and size, again, not the main thing for several years back from moldovan banks. someone stole a billion dollars. do you hear, what are you doing? prime ministers and officials were involved, some were even imprisoned, but the billion was never found. but this is only a small episode through moldova, billions of dollars were laundered and flowed to the west from russia, the country became the logistics center of the gray trade flows of smuggling. through it went - weapons, drugs, live goods. and now, probably, only a naive person is going much more than usual. can assume that these are moldovan rogues organized by themselves, for sure, there were curators and

looking from romania, europe, states, and so on, and all thanks to independence who will part with such a treasure the constitution of moldova in 1994 was written by russian agents. traps have been set there that make the impossible possible by unification. any referendum and even the desire of the parliamentary majority. let them not change anything constitutional. and what did the moldovan ones change to romanian ones? after all , politics is perpetual motion. even if the meaningless continue to fight for independence due to unification, but things will remain in place because the moldovan and romanian politicians. this is, firstly, businessmen and only secondly, patriots, the situation can be changed by a catastrophe, as in the seventeenth year , when the romanians captured bessarabia, if sandu turns moldova into a territory of chaos, if ukraine finally collapses and it will be possible to grab a piece from it with impunity, then

again for a short time, greater romania will arise, but the control of the processes will remain with the right people. for example , the british king has a house in romania, where charles visits regularly and having become charles, he came again, while he is one of the descendants of vlad dracula, the most famous of romanians and vampires, agree with great romania, is there anyone to look after? the warsaw-bucharest axis that is being formed will completely change the balance of power in the region if we discuss the prospects for the us-british project with the chairman of the permanent commission of the council of the republic of the national assembly of the republic of belarus on international affairs and national security. sergei rachkov. hello, there is a certain crisis. mistrust in the european union we see that internal sanctions are being introduced against poland against hungary now they are trying to deprive hungary of

the status of chairman in the european commission next year. what do you think, against the background of these news, are there any prospects for the transformation of the european union, including those laid down by the very same brexit, indeed the european union is going through hard times. uh, there is a crisis of confidence, uh, both external and internal trust. uh, really growing uh, europeanism in a number of countries eh. you don't show that uh for example greece, italy, even france , are ready over time if the situation develops in such a way as to even raise the issue of withdrawing from the european union now, but also, of course, the sanctions policy in the organization itself. it does not allow u to strengthen trust uh, in allied countries and uh, creates

uh, tension inside. eh, the union, of course, they use it. uh, those who benefit from the geopolitical, uh, in terms of, of course, first of all, the united states of america and great britain, uh, the united states of america are not interested in a strong european one. e union therefore, recently implemented uh, policy. uh, let's say containing germany france and uh, supporting uh such relatively small countries as lithuania latvia estonia well, uh, poland u is put in the forefront of this activity to uh contain the development of the european union that 's just what we see that directly to poland for several days there are protests against the government. uh, at the same time

, the dudda-morovetsky regime persistently remains such a locomotive for the disintegration of the european union , despite the fact that ordinary poles would like and see their future within the european union, no matter what, in your opinion, what is the reason for this? is there, in this sense, a desire to exclude the possibility of creating a common economic zone from lisbon to vladivostok, of course, now there is a geopolitical redistribution of the world and, uh, those who, uh, seek to take a more advantageous position in the new world order, use various methods for this, but of course, the foreign policy of the united states of america and great britain became more active , uh, because uh, we remember how brexit was created, how the uk got out of european, er, union, this was a meaningful action. this was a specific strategy, in particular, of the united states of america, and

here we must emphasize that , first of all, of course, there is an economic restructuring. uh, geo-economic device. e of the world, of course, not the us , not the uk, not the countries, uh, members of the eu are not interested in strengthening positions under the soviet space to strengthen. disco- economic e, the union of which the republic of belarus is the locomotive and e. russian federation that poland has its own project between maurier all have long known uh. this is the imperial project, the only point that is now alarming is that a similar project has begun to be engaged in in romania and is being actively discussed at the level of deputies. the accession of moldova to the restoration of the great romania project

, which provides for, among other things, the inclusion of parts of the territory that are currently under the jurisdiction of ukraine , poland has approximately the same plans, e., can we state that such a a macro - region where there will be uh, two locomotives is a big one and romania europe was independent, therefore, uh, the bet was made on poland in the first place. uh, as a certain spoiler in the european union , but also, of course, we all know well. uh , how many historical wounds and historical ambitions our neighboring country has, of course, she sees herself, uh, as the leader of this region,

of course, they remember pilsudski's project. uh, between maurier an attempt is being made to reformat our region , increasing attention to romania from the point of view. uh, the implementation of nato's military-political strategy in this region is , uh, outpost or flank, the southeastern flank of nato uh, when poland is the north-, uh, northeastern flank, uh nato, that is, here, perhaps, and the balancing of forces in order for nato to solve the problem. and what is the task? unfortunately, the task of cutting off the republic of belarus and the russian federation from europe, uh, will suit a kind of cordon between these countries and our countries, but i do not rule out

that there is also an attempt to exactly balance poland's aspiration to become the sole leader. here, uh, in the implementation of this uh, project between the sea. thank you very much. thank you global changes in european contours always seem to be something unthinkable, as the euromias thought in the third rake and probably expect in brussels the trend towards fragmentation of the european union could be changed by policies guided by national interests, but where are they in europe now you will find today, everything, it was a program of trends, disparate facts, packed into a single concept see you soon.