[000:00:00;00] since january of last year, marty and the subjects of trade for the first time signed an agreement that it is effective and in demand to say not only the number of cards issued, but also the amount of the discount provided on them, which is already more than 37 million rubles. realizing the importance of supporting consumers and departments once again prolonging the october program, the negotiations in which we conducted with trade organizations on the subject of extending the discount were very difficult and debatable, you know what is in effect in country, a price regulation system that seriously limits the profitability of the trading link and many companies doubted whether they could really withstand the big discounts provided and they look to withstand the load of this. well, these adjustments that were made to the 713 resolution slightly increase the profitability of the trading link. they allowed the scales to be reversed in order to agree to an extension.

the system of signature discounts under the document was put by the same list of retailers. this is more than a dozen retail chains, remained unchanged and list of goods. mostly. this is a basic set of buyers bread, flour, pasta, beef, pork, a number of dairy products, apples, vegetables and other goods, pensioners with many children and leaks and monthly income no more than the subsistence minimum budget can receive a card from our basket . now it is slightly higher than 352 rubles. yes, it is no secret that food is increasing in price all over the world and our business does not stand aside and is ready to lend a shoulder to those who need support, this decision is very difficult. we are all experiencing difficulties today economic economic activity, but being responsible and declaring. as a socially oriented activity,

our customers, our citizens, decided to sign the agreement. today they should not feel this complexity of the problem of stimulating the sale of domestic products. this is something that also does not leave the first lines of priorities in the work of the department in belarus. they will regulate the laying out of goods on the store shelves. the corresponding measures will be prescribed in the regulatory legal act. march is now actively developing it, it is important that belarusian products be within the reach of the counter and at the level of the eyes of the consumer, last year in the trade sector it was possible to reverse the long-term trend towards a decrease in the share of sales of domestic goods. this trend continues in the current goods. it is increasing this purposeful work carried out by the government of our country and according to the results of the current period, it has grown by 2.3% compared to

last year, we will continue to sell this work more and to the belarusian recent amendments to decree no. 713 also orient the production. so, for example, manufacturers were given the right to provide trade incentive payments to promote their products allen lapu and andrey ivanenko area of ​​interest. and that 's all the information about the most noticeable in the economy today. we will tell you in the area of ​​​​interest tomorrow. i remind you that we are on the air every tuesday, wednesday and thursday. let everything be with you

it turns out. people that once otshuesh and do not start more nicole collected. this is an understandable policy. hello, last year broke the world record for total military spending. they have been growing for 8 years in a row, and spending on weapons has exceeded $2.2

trillion. the united states has already become the leader of the rating out of habit, accounting for a little less than half of almost 900 billion. peace studies many figures today, from them, the military competitions of only the countries of central and western europe exceeded 340 billion dollars and for the first time there was a bar in the eighty-ninth year, when the cold war ended badly. and even if they wanted to start on the other side , it would not be possible for washington to think about adding a rocket or a machine gun to the flag, because last year the country's economy under the heading of war over the past year, spending has grown by 10%. this is 88 billion dollars, almost the entire budget of the russian defense industry. the white house has officially stated that such injections into the military are

reaction to helping ukraine, after all, last year washington spent $ 75 billion on kiev , however, where most of the money actually went is still unclear. so the republicans accuse the democrats of stealing these funds 13,000 grenade launchers 8,500 anti-tank systems. javelin 2,000 drones, about a hundred bradley armored vehicles, and finally, in the future, 31 abrams tanks, all this is washington for ukraine in just one year. we didn't count the ammunition and there were 20 installations here. khaimar. such generous gifts, not at all free. will have to give land and whose sovereignty is already a little bit now a year after the start of the conflict in ukraine, the biden strategy. cleared up clearly in just 15 months, his military assistance to ukraine switched from helmets to uniforms to the level of f-16 bomber fighters. and he's not going to stop. however, the problem

is that this military aid is always not enough for victory, but always just enough to keep hostilities going. potential gold rush to rebuild post-war ukraine. is an interesting addition to biden's strategy of war to the last ukrainian, the more destroyed in this country , the more needs to be restored, which will give more money to american companies cunning enough to wait at the trough until the killings in ukraine subside, that is, once again we note to destroy ukraine and make money on it, and then restore it. the ruins also fill the pockets of nothing new in washington in pursuit of hard currency, even if it is and we are the blood of a whole people an interesting moment on december 8, 2022, at the embassy of ukraine in washington

, the village of sana makarova invited the heads of the largest us military corporations to dinner , the locket martin rating and others the war has become an object of profit for them, having received an invitation to ukrainian diplomats, they should probably think hard about how they look, throwing parties with defense contractors who are profiting on this terrible war , the researcher of the fund, carnegin, noted, and in a conversation with vox the american bull will certainly give huge money. it has already worked and will continue to work. now, if you take all the plans that they are building, there are tens of billions of profits, not income , but net profit, because they made money on these deliveries, but since they dumped old rubbish on ukraine, replenishment of supplies is required, then they forced europe to send they again demand their equipment and other military property to ukraine as leaders of nato, uh, maintaining the military

potential at the same level, even strengthening it. here. naturally , the services of the us military-industrial complex are offered. well, in general, the overall growth of the army and combat readiness requires new volumes. so the scale of e, money earned on the blood is huge. speaking of the united states, we deliberately left nato out of the brackets, because it’s also about western europe here, too, arming to the teeth over the past year, spending increased by 13% it turned out almost half a trillion dollars in the absolute leaders squared, finland’s military wallet became heavier by 36% due to after joining nato, lithuania began to spend a quarter more, almost $ 2 billion , and, of course, poland plus 11 points or $ 27 billion, by the way, the poles, what is called overdone when the us demanded to spend 2% of gdp on defense , warsaw aimed at four

we will show this in more detail later, the nato standard of 2% of gdp for the military budget sounds like a recommendation at the july summit in vilnius that they plan to make the figures mandatory for membership, because stoltenberg is also dissatisfied with budgets growing too slowly and only eight countries have taken the bar of expenses openly irritated tomodal. washington, from the point of view of the united states, 2% should be the lower limit, not the upper limit. we have been providing military support to ukraine since the beginning of the war. this led to the fact that the nato countries began to reduce their own stockpiles of weapons, these gaps need to be filled, i would like to add, in order to provide american corporations with orders for years, the forward leader is the united states, which produces more weapons and which sells it to nato partners in many ways an increase in defense funds means precisely an increase in spending on the purchase of weapons from washington to support

the security guarantees offered by the americans. in addition, countries have different amounts of resources and capabilities. they differ in some states that believe that they should not be drawn into any military issues. confrontation. for this reason. they are not required to increase spending on the contrary. let's take open figures for 2018, what is nato in europe 17 military bases 28 headquarters, six naval bases 14 military depots and 51 the air base here is also 12 tank brigades and four multinational battalions and since then these numbers have increased by about 20%. and now rewind and recount against such a background , lukashenka's words are immediately remembered and the movement at our borders. send a recent entry into the allianceland. for the seventh time witnessed the north atlantic bloc this kind of

action puts the world on a very dangerous brink of global conflict. well, everything i said substantiates the parties. west intervention of the aggression of the russian country in ukraine and so on, but what does the special military operation have to do or what does the entry into finland have to do with nato, in connection with the special military operation, absolutely no waiting for the moment decided that this moment had come. i think that a non-dispersed belarus will not cause much harm, after all, those political decisions would not be made by the people in the same finland. there is not stupid and knows what war is at the summit in madrid in june 22 , the alliance decided to increase the size of the rapid reaction force from 40 to 300,000 people. in addition, romania will host two additional brigades in england, a squadron

of f-35 aircraft. and poland will receive a permanent staff of the fifth army corps. the united states implemented all these plans in about 4 months. and now large-scale exercises are being carried out, including within the borders of our country. for example, anaconda maneuvers in poland are stronger than shield two in lithuania, a soft response in estonia and finally an air defender in germany. in germany, the german sky will be filled with aircraft for almost two weeks, and the exercise, among other things, should demonstrate the strength of the alliance, they will be held with the participation of four airbases in germany and two in the netherlands and the czech republic, exercise areas will be closed to civilian air traffic , forcing airlines to reroute traffic , air national guard director gen michael michael said the exercise will aim to complement the permanent us presence in europe, he said, adding that many alliance pilots will be working together for the first time.

well, also fresh and on the topic of the national assembly. the lower house of the french parliament passed the largest military budget in the history of the country at 413 billion euros for from 2024 to 2030 , defense spending on the european continent increased more last year than in any other region of the world. and here's how the top three in terms of military budgets caution, such figures can make your head spin. so, the top positions of the uk, germany and france amount. each has more than 50 billion euros. it is curious that the european union stimulates military production at the expense of, for example, the european peace fund. you have not heard it has become the main extra-budgetary instrument of the eu for financing external actions of a military and defense nature in terms of 2 billion euros to reimburse the costs of those who supplied ukraine with weapons the size of the fund. as you understand

, it is also systematically growing; an increase by another 3.5 billion is being worked out to support eu military missions and help third countries. the european commission has also adopted an act to support the production of ammunition for its expansion and modernization is proposed a budget of 500 million euros in the form of co-financing and existing eec programs material support will be implemented in the form of grants for projects to modernize, repurpose or create new production facilities in the defense industry. it seems to you that this is a lot where the west is and will continue to try to dominate and destroy competitors, and therefore the budgets for the military-industrial complex will only inflate , according to forecasts, by 2026 defense spending in europe will increase by another one and a half times. as we have already said , poland is among the leaders in increasing military spending, the eloquent

army increased to 160,000 soldiers in 2030 the armed forces will be increased to 300,000. and it will be the largest army in western europe for comparison in germany now 183,000 to match the soldiers and equipment. and now there are 800 tanks, 410 artillery mounts, 1600 vehicle armor and 28 attack helicopters. however, the poles themselves carame are more skeptical of the minister. defense. marius blaszczyk is called the polish napoleon polish ground forces in 2 years will become the strongest in europe , the minister once again declares. defense. marie already cloak. this is nothing but a narrative in the spirit strong united and ready, which in 1939 contributed to our defeat behind the facades of this paper force in the coming years. the polish military is likely to continue to clash. a number of systemic problems, and some of them, such as, for example, the quality of preparation

of equipment or the technical condition of vehicles, they say, the military themselves certainly will not go away with the problem of finding a sufficient number of people who want to serve in the rapidly growing armed forces. poland to become the first military power in europe such warsaw's ambitions are not hidden and the minister of defense does not skimp on loud statements from the category. we will create the most powerful army in the region. it is clear that without the support of the hosts from washington such bold rhetoric. there would be no trace. it is unlikely that warsaw would have led the campaign to amend weapons to kiev after the start of the conflict, if militarizing the country, then this would not be a difficult task, but at the same time the state does not have a normal vc, the polish military company is in constant crisis. how to saturate it with new with unknown technologies, the poles tried to approach this from different sides, but so far they have not succeeded, but it should be noted that with four percent of the military-industrial complex, this is not so much about

the number of armed forces. how much about the purchase of weapons, especially now germany has pitfalls that are increasingly subjugating washington, from which warsaw is increasingly fighting for the title of the main military-industrial complex in the european union has a lot of problems when its own industry cannot have to buy weapons where, of course, in america that is, by the essence of investing their money in the growth of the us economy even when ursula fondyrlain was minister of defense raised the question that the frg needed to rearm, however , the country cannot do this german enterprises, for example, they took defense orders, but it was impossible to fulfill them then the fonderland went on the way that the germans are now taking, if they can’t do it themselves. it is necessary to buy from the americans the question of whether berlin is ready to increase defense spending from one and a half to 2% of gdp simply in order to

invest money in the economy, the germans they invest in it by buying expensive american gas to understand claims on foreign territory in poland, they also do not hesitate to openly present the public with maps of the country, which include, for example, the western regions of belarus or part of ukrainian territories, on which warsaw has also been sharpening its teeth for a long time, not to mention the financing of extremist resources support for traitors to the motherland who fled from belarus and other provocations. remember the leaked correspondence of the head of the office of marowetsky, there, poland does not hide attempts to influence the belarusian rebellion. i was talking to the dude. he says that they don't want to march because all solidarity is involved in the preparations for the celebration. belarusians. they also believe that it is risky to hold a march, because there are still no students and with attendance. maybe bad their offer sent in the morning. today we will discuss them and propose for the implementation of a separate part other neighbors of belarus with peaceful thoughts also do not shine for 2014 , the largest increase in military spending in europe