we often rest very much, everyone is happy. well, very cool. we just dreamed a lot and since january we have been ordering a ticket and waiting we will not wait until we look at the weather, the water is clear. here you can see the fish of the very shore, small windows swim in the morning, when you wake up, you listen to the singing of birds, this air is clean, nature and a cool environment around. the summer season 2023 in belarus will be remembered by tourists, beach holidays, educational excursions, gastronomic projects, of course, festivals. kind and touching the event of babies who were born on independence day, as well as their mothers are congratulated today in minsk in the maternity hospital of the first hospital on july 3, two girls and one boy were born with gifts and flowers, representatives of the city organization, belarus, as well as the administration of the pervomaisky district of minsk , came to them with gifts and flowers guests of honor congratulated young mothers within the framework of the action, belarus with

love for children. an hour and 15 minutes are unusual , so the baby probably wanted to. i somehow felt that, probably, on july 2, i’ll give birth more turned out. so, well, here it is until the third sat in the tummy. waited a very long time. we probably haven't received it for five years. here are the kids. here, and now it turned out and are very happy and happily waiting at home. us it is always even. somehow , a new baby is born in our maternity hospital - this is a new promising future for our country, because these are the ones who will create all the best in our country. this is the future of engineers - this is the future of leaders. this is the future of doctors. independence, 20 little belarusians were born, and in the country there are 121 such festive newborns this year will be left unattended. to remove the tradition of congratulating those whose personal holiday coincided with

the state one killed rus has existed for 15 years. and the birth of new belarusians is the best gift for the independence day and a pleasant conclusion to our release of an information picture. no, my colleagues at 15:00. all i have is see you. belarus shmatem prostrate can be otshukat on the braslav bus here is a ball into the lake for a non-random. name god's wok, in spite of the lake tore off the dyakuyu with its obrysam and they guess the wolf in lake maya the shape of the correct circle does not change for a long time, i eat on the far side, that the wok rushes people from heaven behind the right and smacks them of such choral chandeliers on white.

hello world politics alexander lukashenko played a decisive role in preventing a large-scale civil confrontation in russia, the president of belarus managed to conduct successful negotiations with the head of the private military company wagner yevgeny prigozhin, as a result of which his fighters abandoned further illegal actions, thereby the most large-scale domestic political crisis in russia in the last decade was stopped, which threatened with the most serious consequences, both for the russian people and for the federal republic of belarus, not

putin, not lukashenka, not a hero. we did our job, but we missed a lot, and they didn’t even miss it ; i'm just talking to a russian. hurray as an agitator and no one is needed as a patriot now there is no need to imprison anyone to shoot, it is necessary to cool down and turn this page. republican majority in us congress, as part of an investigation into the dubious business operations of the son of the american president, received the testimony of a witness who claims that joe biden was involved in the relevant scam , in particular, we are talking about a message sent in the summer of 2017 by hunter biden to one chinese businessman, in which he directly demands to pay with him and at the same time refers to the awareness of the situation of the father. in addition, according to the witness,

the fbi and the us department of justice deliberately blocked the investigation for several years against biden jr. and hid the information they had about his illegal actions. in the parisian suburb of nanterre, for several days there were riots, clashes with the police, provoked by the murder of a seventeen-year-old teenager by police during the arrest, a native of algeria, while checking his documents, tried to escape and was shot dead. this event stirred up a large local community of natives of north africa who began to smash shops and burn cars, the police for their part arrested almost two hundred rioters and actively used special means of events in france in many ways resembled the blake lifemeter movement, which stirred up the united states in 2020 after the police killed a black thief, recidivist george floyd. the british poet rediart capling about the rivalry of the british russian empire in

asia, as you know, wrote only when everyone dies, the big game is over, it was easier for kipling in his time there were no nuclear weapons. now the words about everyone will die cease to be hyperbole about why london does not want to realize this and act as the main instigators of a big war and will be discussed. in today's program to disperse the fog, albion's foreign policy , viktor savelyevich will help me today. master of political science. hello. hello. and pavel feldman, deputy director of the institute for strategic studies and forecasts, candidate of political sciences, associate professor, i am glad to welcome you to participate mutually. and igor england, a britishist, is joining our broadcast. international lawyer member of the union writers of russia thank you very much for being with us today. good afternoon, by tradition, we begin our program with a blitz question

. i think it is known to each of us to you personally , an englishwoman crap. pavel, if this is possible, if we talk about a british cat, then it happens periodically and the state of great britain well, not in relation to me personally , of course, in relation to the russian federation . well , that's how our story is. britannia of course, she did not come up with political hypocrisy, but she achieved amazing perfection in this matter. igor, how would you answer this question. well, you know, returning to the english parafira, this expression is stable. he is another expression in his time. as the knights of the round table said. uh, news, we learn from the royal pot, so here is such a double-digit story, despite which side to approach the knights have their own history of relations with the queen, the rest of the world has its own? i

probably wouldn't just uh, center relations between the anglo-saxon world and russia there great britain and russia starting here, as a colleague said of the 16th century. i think that the attitudes towards great britain and its politics are approximately the same in many countries of the world, where the british have left a lot of unanimous leadership, and the traces have shattered the map and, accordingly , are reaping the fruits of this very internecine strife and on its colonialism. victor and what do you think this expression is applicable to the current circumstances to the current game is a big sin, rather the situation is somewhat different england has really reached after let's say the bourgeoisie for the revolution of the 17th century, where the rapid development began, england reached absolute power in the 19th century, it created

a gigantic empire where the sun never set, the territory. the british empire with colonies and dominions reached more than thirty million square kilometers, that is, somewhere at least one and a half times more even than the soviet union and concentrated huge financial resources in the middle of the 19th century, england produced about half of the world industrial output. it was there that the industrial revolution first began. end of the 16th century. and they were the first where this industrial revolution ended. that is, this absolute was mighty. such a monopoly country. and if we are talking, of course, over the past 100-150 years, the power of england has significantly decreased. but england does not want to turn into a country of the second row, and she dreams of gaining a foothold, being in

the first positions anyway, and especially the latest events in ukraine , especially now she has a chance to again become on a par with countries such as the usa china russia again to reach the first positions. they have excellent genetic memory. they have been the most powerful country for centuries and want to be at least among the first even now, so they don’t shit, they fight for their place in the sun and you understand that there is another chance to rise. how exactly will they not have a war in ukraine. uh, you know, i think when we describe the russian-british rivalry , the term big game is applicable to this process, which is quite long historical. what is a big game, a small section of our diplomatic dictionary attention to the screen is a big game

a term describing the russo-british rivalry for dominance in central central asia from 1813 to 1907 at this time, the russian empire motivated its eastward expansion with a desire to civilize the backward peoples of central asia , open up a market for central asian goods, including cotton, and stop the devastating raids of local peoples on her possessions, britain was afraid of rejection of india and the strengthening of the russian empire on the world stage. in connection with its possible access to the indian ocean through the version and afghanistan after 1907 the struggle for the influence of central asia ceased. to be a concern exclusively of british and russian diplomacy, both sides had to reckon with the germany of modern history under a big game. many political scientists have in mind the struggle between nato and the sco for influence in central asia. igor and let's talk, after all, right now

it is clear that the united kingdom is no longer an empire as an actor in world politics. at the moment there are a lot of problems with the army fleet economy london is gradually losing the status of the main financial center. perhaps you will correct me if you do not agree, but at the same time england remains a serious player . great britain has not gone anywhere since the world war. uh, it’s just that at some time, maybe even now she looks more like a shady player, but in fact her political influence is no less than it may have been before in the uk yes, if you take it yourself imagine this island, it's just there the sex census of the xxi first year 53 million, if my memory fails me, but if we take the population of the countries of the commonwealth of great britain, then this is already more than two e, 2.2 in my opinion, huh? yes, the population and that's it. how the uk manages to control its former colonies, and

the term colony itself has gone out of use. only since 2002, they have been replaced by dependent territories, but, nevertheless, this status of great britain as a crown that dominates within the commonwealth, it remains, but a beautiful wrapper that is present in the commonwealth. she has to admit it. eh, how for a given, the british know how to beautifully package their product, whether it be a financial center or some kind of cultural cooperation, because within the commonwealth there are even commonwealth sports games, which, in my opinion, do not exist, but have recently ended. says the uk is playing a very subtle game, if you look at what a bloody history it had, professional diplomacy helps in this, high-class intelligence, if we are talking about the 21st century, and the long game is part of a big game. this is not a minute result. this is a game of strategy. this is a game for the ages. and, uh

, the ability to build controlled elites in controlled states. after all. we are talking about 53 million and what i wanted to emphasize. uh, what a large-scale gap of 53 million, the british against two, almost two and a half billion of the rest of the population, and this somehow needs to be controlled. how , by creating loyal kings, britain should be given its due very successfully came out of its imperial colonial period of history much more successfully did london than, for example. the same moscow that invested colossal resources in its asian republics will not use the word colony. but london, on the contrary, has always pumped out resources, all the best juices , strength, money, labor resources from its colonies, but at the same time, many regions that were once part of the soviet union or its spheres

of influence were sent to moscow. they do not like, despite the help that they received. but london is largely idolized. and that's exactly what was said. this was achieved primarily through soft strength. here the uk realized before others that you can bet on it even before the americans. how to preserve the neo colonial system should be done so that in these former colonies the elites have their financial interests, their personal future, the future of their children was tied to the metropolis in london, and they achieved this in a paradoxical way russia at a certain stage of their history in the nineties. at the beginning of the 2000s, it almost became the same, a la colony of great britain, because the russian oligarchs all their resources, their children, their assets taken out to london. they would probably continue to do so now. if the policy of the uk has not changed, but still worth noting. yes, this is how the layman perceives, and the layman is a simple layman, the viewer

, the information that we now hear from the uk yes, over the past 2 years , three premieres have changed in london and the cabinet or the rhinestone in general. it seems to me that i remember only the farewell to the queen and the catastrophic collapse of the fullt. and yet in the end. these are the shocks britain does not leave the race. although neither china nor russia is the same, republic of belarus here they can not imagine. to be allowed to have such a leapfrog, which sometimes takes shape in the managerial elite, and at the same time relatively confidently go its own course. and i think that victor will quite agree with pavel and igor regarding the fact that there are albion and certain instruments of easterlingment in the broadest sense, which doesn’t care who sits, but at the address of an old color, 10 absolutely, it doesn’t matter here. you 're talking about managerial, uh, structures. well, it's formally the prime minister. they are playing far from the first violin. and there it doesn't matter who

will be there? uh, boris johnson who was more into parties there. we remember uh, he always went shaggy or a leaf of times, which is generally for management, well, very far from management, or, uh, less often, a son who now comes from a hindu environment, being the most ethnic hindu, fits perfectly into the english elite. these are all high-ranking let's say less real power. this closed society is the elite. it can be said the aristocracy, which still dates back to the 17th century, the eighteenth. and that's all performers, so this leapfrog absolutely does not play any role. and because the pounds will rise, then fall, or some other problems, it's all a trifle, because the uk has more powerful than experienced backlog.

these are diplomats and financiers and industrialists and the military sphere. no matter how weak it is somewhere. they have a colossal colossal potential igor then the question arises. but what is dictated by this stable view, which now we are increasingly seeing in practice , the historical super-task of great britain is the fight against russia, who is the gunner of this conflict, well, to name, perhaps, a specific event, uh, which was the trigger, uh, modern, uh, events. i probably find it difficult to say, but i will say the following: here, and in the development of the thesis of my colleague, whether the monarchy is a presidential republic, a parliamentary republic. this is just a form of government more important than the principle of government until now , human civilization follows the elitist principle of government, that is, societies are controlled by elites. accordingly, it is necessary

to look where interests lie. elite conservatives whether it's volleyball players at all whether it matters to try boris jones these are all minor changes. it would not seem to us that such dramatic changes are taking place in english society , nothing like the general structure itself , the elite part of this society itself is very stable. all of the uk's interests are directed outward in the control of international sea lanes of communications, in the control of the resource base, as i said, and here they had some moment, probably, they did not have such a global competitor until then. until the russian empire started their own expansion, but the struggle for an exit. to the seas, the expansion of their presence for security purposes in central central asia, and here the british saw their rivals in russia. moreover , we will not forget that the dynastic russian empire was very close to the english crown

, and yet this did not prevent the english crown from seeing russia as the first and foremost enemy. gibraltar must be controlled the suez canal must be controlled by the poor. these are the folk of the island. these rocks in the atlantic ocean are also necessary, turns out to be in control and great britain went to war with argentina and achieved its goal there, but regained its control, that is , nothing changed in the 17th century the globe, how did it look like a bottleneck? and so it remains for these russian places, for the straits, for the passages, for communications. uh, there is a serious struggle ahead, and in fact, perhaps, the accelerator can become a in the northern sea route, after all , this is a real alternative to the very communications that control the ansaxon world. and if we manage to create uninterrupted channel, and messages bypassing

the british american military bases, then the world economy will be arranged in a completely different way. well, who would like to lose it, but i don’t know, among the revolution there is in the form of global warming, so that they don’t talk about the technological position of russia , but russia is a country with the most powerful icebreaking fleet. and the combination of the icebreaker fleet with global warming can really create objective conditions for the logistics of international trade to seriously change, not in favor of america and great britain by the way, in russia there is an interesting historical hypothesis that explains this centuries-old conflict, allegedly, well, in the order of the legend, ivan the terrible at one time offered the british queen elizabeth to conclude with him. she rudely refused marriage, and since then this conflict has been on the rise, but ioann vasilyevich did not accept this refusal. although it would be interesting to agree that the configuration of international relations would have developed. well

, it turned out what happened in the 16th century, because , uh, what was the world alignment on the seas? uh, they were ruled by no means, not by great britain, but by portugal and spain, and, probably, elizabeth could have acted a little wiser. well, by the way, this was the only woman with whom ivan the terrible was officially in correspondence with the question. and culture was denied to all men for some reason. yes, well, only he was refused, as if he had done everything he could against him, such was her female will from phenomena, and then yes, there were objective contradictions in geopolitics, many are not considered a science, but nonetheless. why persia why turkey turned to stone stumbling blocks? and because of the trade routes, because of the straits, but because of the movement. bars and warships, and i must say britain, she mastered not only soft power technologies much earlier, but also the tools of this uncontrollable chaos. let's remember how she idolized turkey against russia

, stirred up the whole world against the soviet union , probably more anti-soviet than the british regime since churchill's time . open competitors. and if we say that the united states is playing to weaken the european union , but london also makes it even more willing to break off relations with the european union after a loud brexit. although naturally, we understand that this is such a controversial issue. was this desire so sharp, or is it such an accident yes, a stone on the road can change the fate of colleagues wondered who the british in the world are now good with in the world ext wearing i say non-celites between the british and the former colonial the leaders of the oligarchs, and so it is with the peoples . uh, probably the same, uh, difficult problems exist in london, not only with

moscow there or minsk, uh. well, and first of all, with paris, its closest neighbors , the french across the english channel, who can be dearer to them than what people in the world love the british today oleg voloshin, ukrainian politician, candidate of political sciences , alette joins us. welcome to the studio talking today about the uk they are a simple relationship. yes, extremely difficult today with the russian federation and of course remembered and the term englishwoman crap. here, in your opinion, is what motivates the british political class to take such a militant anti-russian stance. well , it seems to me, uh, the root of the problem is here besides. uh, actually historical uh, some. eh, allusions, indeed, and a great tradition. e confrontation between britain and russia at different times. although, again , let's not forget that in all the key warriors, but

when it was really about the possibility of establishing one force of total hegemony in the world by military means. this is napoleon or kaiser's nazi germany, germany and britain russia were on the same side. well, in general, in general. i heard the discussion there and didn’t really decide with my ear and i won’t go into it there and expand it, but i would, of course, i am an ardent opponent of anglophobia, like any other phobia, not to mention the fact that let’s be frank to everyone we somehow taught at school, they started their first foreign language english, probably, to some extent it doesn’t matter, and all the people in the space are more or less educated. basically, it said. on really key factors. this is indeed the exit of britain from the eu britain began to look for its place in the world. and uh actually found it. well, more precisely, this is a certain part of its elite, you need to understand that but in the conflict around our country around ukraine, mainly the intelligence community and, to a large extent, the military elite are involved, not so britain even got involved in a confrontation with russia around

ukraine, how many of those who when he was in power, he dismissed the case and, due to the thoughtlessness of us ukrainian voters, provided his helm the state government agreed to accept the british protectors over themselves. that is, it is not so much the success of british diplomacy. how much, uh, and the venality that zelensky's team, which yes, let's talk about this in more detail now victor well , you will agree that in the current political alignments. if i may. to put it this way, britain plays an important role, and how much it provokes ukraine is obvious to all players. in my opinion. she plays the first role in the degree. aggressiveness according to the degree e desire to kindle more and more and more conflict in ukraine , uh, great britain overtakes even in the united states of america well, to talk about, for that, by chance, in ukraine there were some forces such, uh, that the uk has a protectorate over them. this is not entirely correct

in ukraine, these forces. including great britain, they were preparing, for many decades great britain actively supported the bandera people even after the war. e, transferred money to them , weapons, means of communication, e, established contacts through canada through other dominions. that is, great britain pumped up nationalism and even soviet ukraine actively. this began here even more actively in the ninety-two thousand years, it is logical that this led to yushchenko's orange revolution and that's it. this led mr. poroshenko zelensky well and maidan 14 years old. do you agree with victor's position? please, you have the floor of many events of the political ukrainians of the republican army. in general, if you went irish terro. so it's normal in a geopolitical confrontation, that is, uh, naturally, on the other side, but don't you know u count uh, what is the norm you know in a fighting match, a good hook.

uh, for whoever got it, it 's a bad luck for whoever got it, so let's not demonize the brits. and recognize their strengths and look for ways to counteract them. and so. the main thing i want to say, yes, accident why because, objectively speaking, the uk today is not, and not what a superpower is, but even a great power in a full-fledged one it has no resources, no money proper, no military capabilities unilaterally refuel. e. especially, perhaps, a region remote from it? in general, not her presence is atypical for her. it is not the middle east that he traditionally has in britain, but strong ties with the elites. it’s not in southern africa and not from other regions that mr. zelinsky yermak got in october of the twentieth year. acceptance to the leader misha with mr. moore and there, in fact, well, this condition was actually recruited and agreed to follow the course of mi-6 in everything. this is indeed

a lucky coincidence. i want more time to pay attention. yes, in general , the uk is natural, as is poland, yes, but in uh, in nine out of ten cases. it will probably be in some confrontational situations against russia, but the fact is that now it is in ukraine in relation to which for years the annexed states had a much greater financial and economic influence through the elites and so on. naturally. and even germany plays the first violin. ah, the british. this is the result of the fact that mr. yermak, who is actually the ruler of ukraine, is the right hand of zelensky but he actually makes the decision, as some of us are considered to be the direct agent of the decision. thank you, interesting, quite a bright position, you know the leader of the republic of belarus alexander lukashenko has repeatedly stated that it is not zelensky who is leading the whole process, but representatives of the west britain the united states completely took control of the military operation go to odessa and russia we will hear zelensky’s direct speech on

the table two phones one telephone, second telephone, satellite links with biden and british prime minister johnson two telephones. here, basically it is controlled. these two leaders yes. and you definitely mentioned oleg. on october 7-8, 2020, the fateful and in many ways tragic for the future of ukraine meeting between president volodymyr zelensky and the head of british intelligence misheste richard moore took place in the uk . according to zelensky, it was the british side who said that ukraine is a big problem with the fact that the media ukrainians and therefore the main question, about which it was said just that they should be independent, who today, when in ukraine the war is protecting the sovereignty of ukraine and territorial integrity.

you know, pavel is in this and, uh, some kind of incredible dilemma, because for many ukrainians who voted for zelensky, he was a man who , naturally, but promised peace, promised the end of the war and set this as the goal of his presidency even a few months later, as if this mask had been torn off, and under it we saw a completely different one, and this meeting in london did she really switch this toggle switch in the head of the ukrainian leader. well, anyway, i not inclined to believe in the power of one meeting. even at this level, especially since she was far from the only one, i remembered. how many times zelensky held talks with boris johnson, a complex of factors played a role here, but in order to be absolutely correctly noted for zelensky, the majority of russian-speaking ukraine eastern ukraine voted for the future president of the world who will solve the problem of donbass in one way or another. and

by the way, at a certain stage. it seemed to me personally that he was trying to remember, for example, there were negotiations with president putin in the minsk format. and then, probably, as never before, there were hopes that this conflict could be regulated through diplomacy, but by certain forces. wrapped up. it is in the saddest possible scenario for the development of events that one of these centers of power is definitely london second washington and then on the list. what i completely agree with viktor is that britain is number one in general in the forefront of modern anti-russian politics, and in russia we often consume such is the concept of red lines. now i would say in a crow's context, because western partners systematically cross, and in russian society. there is a feeling that the authorities are not tough enough at the intersection of these red lines. reacts like this first. this is what the british always do. they were the first to deliver modern long-range anti-ship missiles to ukraine. they

supplied them with missiles of the class. land beating today semi-ugansk in donetsk. they supplied them with tanks, the challenger and the rest of the western countries. see the red lines you can cross following the example of the uk pull up, so we must pay tribute to and against. nick i would even tell the enemy courage, they have enough today. they are not afraid to escalate with one of the largest nuclear powers, and this is a challenge that moscow will respond to. do the british understand perfectly, or do they want to stay afloat? yes, i don’t agree that they are small there, the power of the british, the great power, despite the fact that they are a small country, because they have these huge dominion former colonies. these elite, fed britain plays a much bigger role than they do on the political map. the vatican is also not a very large country. however, the vatican stands by the power of many huge countries, therefore britain in this regard.

now they will have the last and decisive battle or they will defeat russia from russia with the help of the united states and other allies, including our republic of belarus, inflict a crushing defeat and will again shine in world history. if this fails, then britain and then finally. uh, already leave the arena and may indeed turn into a minor country. you know, uh, viktor, president of ukraine volodymyr zelensky , came to the uk last month to meet with mr. rishi sunakom is the purpose of the visit. it is understandable to plead with the british for supplies, new weapons well, despite the fact that britain has become one of the main suppliers of weapons. equipment, kiev today said after the usa which one? zhenya supplies london to ukraine and how important it is at the moment is detailed in our story from the very beginning of russia's special operation in

britain has become one of the main suppliers of weapons equipment to kiev, so last month long-range missiles were sent to ukraine, their range of more than 250 km, for comparison, american missiles can overcome only 80 , so it was london who was the first to supply cruise missiles to kiev and, as stated in russia, ukraine has already begun to use them , britain has also become. the first country to supply the kiev regime with main battle tanks that are in service in nato countries, we are talking about 14 challenger-2 tanks, and also, about 30 self -propelled artillery mounts, namely the supply of tanks, could influence germany, which nevertheless agreed to provide ukraine with a leopard, 2, according to many military analysts, tanks in combination. with other weapons systems will be vital to any attempt by ukraine to dislodge russian troops from entrenched positions in the expected offensive. in addition,

london announced the delivery of hundreds of attack drones, a range of more than 200 km and air defense missiles according to drones can be especially effective for supplying troops on the front line, especially under fire from russian artillery and in conditions where there is a risk of encirclement . that the uk has already sent or is about to send to ukraine, and according to experts, such multimillion-dollar spending by london speaks of a direct benefit of the kingdom in russian-ukrainian conflict. oleg tell me, please, could you imagine a few years ago that the key partners for ukraine would be the uk. why is the united states present in this story? well, you know

, i think the dirty deeds of the democrats and the biden family. we will remember again and again. and why it is beneficial for them this story. and that's why britain, just the united states, is present everywhere, because it is really a lonely superpower, trying, but painfully to fight for the preservation of their japan naturally for her. e, this has been said, retold dozens of times, we will not repeat it. i think our respected viewers, in principle, understand that for the united states, any weakening of russia and through which the possibility of relaxing the tandem from all of china is seen as important and beneficial, at least. in any case, this could not be left out of the attempt. e moscow font in a radical way. the problem she had with ukraine was to get governments loyal to herself in kiev, as far as the uk is concerned, why about tunism? yes, because it’s correct to say alexander grigorievich really lukashenko about the fact that there is naturally that she has a direct connection with washington, then you care if biden wants to communicate regularly with zelensky

that is the question, and i know for sure that it’s not, but because and zelensky is well known there. all its features. all his weaknesses are corrupted from the regime, and in this passion for all sorts of illegal drugs and everything else. yes, fuck us, frankly, firstly, as the president of a superpower, who has problems through the roof and others who else to talk to, and secondly, uh, well, we all know. at what service age are the most mister bayer they are here, here is soprotism in the sense of who has more to do everything. that's just the british and we noticed, by the way, that three prime ministers have already been steadily replaced, each subsequent uh, more and more active. well, as it were, if they are more active , the same or how he is a little more cunning, of course, than blist or than johnson. well, it ’s enough to consistently play on this field, they play ro. leh is really such to himself and lawyers and key lobbyists escalating confrontation. that is, they are not too lazy, but to pick up the phone and call to get in and i’m too lazy, but to lobby zelensky’s interests to dissuade other leaders and it was correctly

said in the studio that britain serves as such an icebreaker, but what are 14 tanks, but right on the scale of the current front. this is generally nonsense, it is really due to the supply of ki. a dash of these fourteen managed to get there under a hundred o'clock, already leopards. a, maybe there will be more and indeed britain, uh, is playing. here the role is played by the fact that, in general, no one wants e big confrontation with russia, the americans. in fact, they cannot but participate in it, but without a twinkle. we see this very well, but the british really participate with a big twinkle, the appearance of this twinkle in their eyes. i would say that the hypothesis is in order that the british on the territory of ukraine compete not only with russia, but also with america. so, to say that there are four consecutive prime ministers of this countries support give weapons to kiev they are all representatives of one party the conservative party expresses the elite, the old british expresses the interests of the old british elite. and this is the old british

elite, even the americans are treated a little arrogantly. i would even say revanchist, so london today is very important in contrast. as a colleague with a sluggishly not very capable biden said quite rightly, they show that they are brave guys, that they are not afraid to escalate, even with such a powerful center of power, the horse is moscow and in this respect they are much more decisive of the united states of america, after all, with hmm the colossal military potential of london but, probably, it is not comparable to the american one, and these guys act more boldly than washington, they show more political will and decisiveness, and thus britain is quietly. in contrast to her former colony , she is regaining that role in the big game that nadezhda said at the beginning, which was lost during the cold war. she is returning and will have to be reckoned with as a new center forces no less significant than washington victor tell, please, here, of course, in

any person. yes, at least a little interested in history. and when we talk about great politicians, yes, that's modernity or the 20th century, the surname of winston, churchill naturally arises in my head, how would he if he had the opportunity to look at what was happening, he reacted to this. well, i think that churchill, if he had been resurrected , would have reacted with great pleasure to this whole picture, churchill - it was the worst enemy of russia and especially the soviet union did everything to kindle a civil war in the territory of the former russian empire. he dreamed of strangling, uh, bolshevik russia, and when he was defeated , he did everything between the wars to do as much harm as possible and slow down the development of the soviet union , and therefore the post-war years. churchill has always

been an enemy. only when germany began to threaten the years of the second world war, then the draftsmen already deigned to cooperate with the soviet union, but as soon as the war was over it had not yet ended and remained a couple of weeks before the end of the war. he had already drawn up an unthinkable plan to launch a war against the soviet union with the former defeated german units, but the americans opposed it, because it was already too unthinkable, therefore, when the church would now see what he was doing. e hmm , this is happiness that we managed to unleash a full-scale war on the territory of the former soviet union and how the british are actively involved, he would say even bolder. sulka and the english elites are even more active and we must say to finish off, as long as possible, there is in russia that's what he said. and i remind you that on the air

the program sas is authorized to announce that we are talking about a new big game. oleg voloshin , oleg is in touch with us here. tell me, please, what can change this position of britain , which we are talking about today in the program , somewhat at risk, of course, subjected to criticism, respected. uh, guests of your studio, but by the way, i looked up at the bookshelf on my desk. it stands there. actually, the book fights the johnson factor, churchill and of course, naturally, what will johnson really dreamed of and wanted to be like on charters and wrote, in my opinion, one of the best er books on this really great british politics, and i don't argue. on the one hand, i agree that, e churchill , the situation is ugly. and of course, he would have been there, uh , there is no jones, let's say johnson is also what he called jeans for centuries and probably, the enemies of russia and china in the current situation. but on the other hand, all the same, if we already remember about history about the era when the chepcha

really lived without if, uh, so then support the british establishment line. uh, churchill on the consistent support of white movement. we would have had the white guards, they would have won in general, then there would have been no ukrainian soviet socialist republic and there would have been no ukraine with vladimirovich lenin, as putin has been calling it lately, and probably there would have been no current confrontation. so, to be honest, churchill is not worth being called a russophobe. i, as a person who deeply regrets that the civil war in russia ended the way it ended, i think that it would be better if they listened to churchill , but what about? ah of that, how to change uh position. uh, britain now. yes, probably, in no way i can only say that the british really use it very competently, as it were, so that it is correct to say that in the event of any response from russia, it will be systemic, some kind of large-scale, especially military, but let's say this answer. it will also affect the united states, so, of course, the british are very comfortable and easy to take risks, realizing that

big guys from the ocean are getting into a big fight. uh, in this sense, they are, of course, uh, they are well aware of this, but for themselves the report is that russia can't answer just britain without hitting the us because it's so important to the united states of britain and therefore even discussing these options. although now then a very respected mr. karaganov. uh, it’s not merged into the discussion, there are arguments about a primitive nuclear strike, but i wouldn’t play these games differently, i’ll just note by analogy. here i have, as in the international affairs, and first of all , the political scientists of the international affairs on the education of a diplomat. and it seems that the association with a very competent line today, which is being carried out cattle republic of belarus, uh, everyone knows that just such a name has developed with alexander lukashenko that, unlike many in moscow , he has, let's say, a critical situation there, his hand is not a friend, and alexander lukashenko's leaders of the republic of belarus about whether their hand will tremble or still no, please, they are all still leading

to the third world war, but they are terribly afraid of it. i know this for sure, but i have met people who play an important role in this and take radical cardinal and final decisions if they are most afraid. it's sincerely all about it. they say. ah, nuclear disasters. they are afraid of this, they are afraid of the use of nuclear weapons in ukraine, what are they? god forbid russia will do it and so on and so forth. well, it's natural. we don't want either. we are afraid too. we want to live, because it can lead to a specialist saying, world catastrophe and the ball can be knocked down if all these weapons explode, they ask a question. you know the leadership of russia there. say yes or no. no, i say yes, nuclear weapons are for that and there will press or i will press on the miser, yes, in the hand. and how, well, in one case,

if you make a very dangerous movement in the sense that tuesday is on the territory of russia and this will threaten e existence in russia, in a word. if you put putin against the wall or into a corner, drive him in and there will be no other way out from the corner, only forward. may go out. then wait until then. eh, there's still a possibility. let's agree, but they don't let volodya zelensky reach an agreement. yes, and he himself is good, although, uh, i'm sure and have such information that in i’ll tell ukraine today, they won’t explode for you. there in ukraine today, the vast majority of people want to end the war. and this is a terrifying fortune-telling on a daisy of the current western leaders will press or not press, and now they really have already forgotten about the possible red lines, because they have all been

destroyed paul please, well, everyone has already put themselves in churchill's place i just can't help but do it, and then i will answer your questions. i think, of course, in general, he would be pleased with what is happening and support the policy of his conservative party, which implements bags, but he would hardly be pleased that ukraine would use neo-nazis as a taran against russia. still. let's give churchill credit, he was one of the main enemies of fascism in the history of mankind, the man who saved britain from the fascist turn, to which she, er, at the behest of her elite. came very close at the time. as for these, the notorious red line. it's clear. that that red button, and which they say so much, is in moscow in the hands of the president of the russian federation, but i am sure with all my might, and do not want to press it. he, probably, relies on the will of the russian people, if he wanted to, he could have done it long ago, where the first will say to grief, it is all

fire. it seems to me that they can say so in russia and in this game, whoever turns first will blink first, looking into each other's eyes. the west is taking a very big risk, because once again i want to say to the russian people, well, let it sound harsh in this studio, nevertheless, i have already given the president a mandate to use nuclear weapons. many are wondering. why hasn't it been uncovered yet? and so, therefore, in the western center of power of the trace. there was probably a thorough thought on the subject of how much you can tease the nuclear bear, sooner or later the notorious red lines will be absolutely right ahead. you know , pavel, and we, of course, naturally now perceive the west as the west, which is actually the only one among, but frightening, yes. on the tough and militant rhetoric of hmm , quite sound , adequate and wise thoughts are also visible. i would like to we drew attention to the statement

of the member of the european parliament. claire delhi let's listen together need to constantly ask yourself. whose interests does the prolongation of the war serve, obviously, that the lack of interest of the ukrainians, whose blood is shed on the battlefield? whose cities are being destroyed and whose relatives and friends are forced to leave the country for the inhabitants of ukraine - this is not stopping. horrifying attempts to start the process of peace negotiations were already made in april last year, however, we. it is known that the governments of the united states and great britain acted strongly opposed to this idea. yes, it was an exclusive commentary for the program. sasha is authorized to declare what was written in strasbourg, and then clairedale really said that it was britain, yes. in march 2022, together with the united states, those players acted as those who did not push ukraine, but, on the contrary, moved away from the world and the cessation of hostilities victor well, i want to say no underestimate. uh, western countries and western

leaders. if they think that they are used to sitting in cafes and comfort if they need to go to a nuclear war and, most likely, they will go to a nuclear war. these are people who for centuries sailed on pirate ships died, well, they robbed and cannot but rob the whole world for 500 years, the british then the united states. do you remember reagan, who said that there are things more important than the world and who managed to bend down and in the end. to overwhelm the soviet union, it was the old party nomenclature that was afraid of departed and the soviet union was destroyed, the same thing is happening with the current russian federation permanent red line concessions. correctly , paul has already turned into some kind of irony. they think if we destroyed the soviet union, why can't we destroy the russian federation, which is five times

weaker than the soviet union? why do we have such power now and england is rising from the usa as a powerful and generally collective west, and also china is making a gesture with china, something then they should do something, therefore, i think that they are afraid that they are some kind of comfort for them now, uh, one task is to maintain world domination, or they will retain it, or they will roll back and in the end eventually fall apart. therefore, there is no peace here, so that they will go to the world, there is no world , the most severe confrontation is going on. i think that tactical nuclear weapons will be used on both sides, at least we need to prepare for this. and especially here in the republic of belarus we have such a high balcony here. here it is necessary to prepare both the russian federation and the west for a confrontation. nobody will turn. it's not going to turn into some kind of, uh, peaceful '53 korea or whatever, the stakes are already very high now, and they'll be

grow, oleg, but tell me, i often hear the position of some belarusian experts that enough to endure this, let's hit the nuclear polondon with weapons. here is how you feel about such a position and what is your correct view in the current geopolitical game. unfortunately people are watching, but let's be responsible for our words. tree sticks. well, now look at our program and restart all the children in the bunkers and look for iodine there . uh, as putin clearly said and this can be seen in in general, in russia they are even afraid to carry out a mass mobilization, apparently assessing the readiness of a mass ordinary russian to die simply with a machine gun in his hands. i would doubt that there is really a russian leadership there.

again, so clear. lukashenko correctly said that if there is a threat of an exam, that is , a direct invasion of the territory of the russian federation threatening the very existence of the russian federation well, roughly speaking, no one for melitopol or berdyansk nuclear war. i will not untie. uh, and that's great you need to understand when they started a special operation from something, they went off, they made mistakes, they made stupid openings. a bunch of shortcomings of the russian army will be gradually corrected, but i think that putin, who started it all, for sure, will not say, yes , we are so weak for the guys that, apart from a nuclear bomb, we have nothing, after all, let's be frank about nuclear arguments weapons, a sign of weakness. that is, it’s like there are no more other instruments left. the fact that sergey aleksandrovich karaganov, as extreme a competent international specialist threw an intellectual provocation. this is one thing that needs to be said about the fact that a nuclear conflict in the event of certain levels of escalation. in principle, this is possible correctly, but let's talk about the fact that the drone flew to the kremlin. let's talk about this. he asked the nuclear bomb,

did you even go? there sorry for being rude. what kind of nonsense? no, of course, there are still thousands of humiliations that russia can endure a thousand times to win after that, but a nuclear war can only be unleashed once, and i'm glad that it won't actually happen. yes, yes, by vera all the same, it’s not a bear who lives by instincts, but a wise thinking person and at the head of the republic of belarus, too, so let's not indulge in emotions. let's reassure our people there will be no nuclear war. we do not give in to emotions. i personally am also deeply convinced that this will not happen, by the way, there is one more reason , in addition to all those voiced, there is china with which moscow maintains warm economic and political relations with minsk and it is unlikely that they will remain so warm and friendly if moscow uses nuclear weapon. i think that senzinpin, therefore , made a quite unambiguous statement about it during direct negotiations with president putin regarding nuclear weapons in general. and it does not give tactical putin.