in general, the most difficult for me is may and june, fortunately. they have already gone through, then a lot of separate training a lot of forehead will earn monotonous uncomfortable and rather boring. from july, from august , more intensive and more interesting work begins. uh, already reminiscent of the competition in july. we will work on the anaerobic threshold - this is the phase when the speed is high, it seems that you get tired, but the body at this time. we have time, uh, we need mountains to recover in general , because uh, for example, i am no longer a slave receives its effect, which was supposed to receive, which received earlier, respectively. i get tired muscular joint get tired, maybe somewhere morally, but functionally inside. i don't feel like i'm tired. when you run through the woods with sticks, too, the base is essentially. yes? this is her diversity. this is such versatility.

yes, yes, this is a diverse workout, and i repeat that we do different workouts in order to give rest and recovery to our joint muscles and ligaments. e, for example, e. just recently they turned bike 4 hours. e at one moment. it became very difficult for me. and ivan came back to pull me up to the group. e, it would seem that we are spinning in a group, but at one moment, i felt that i was lagging behind and could not get everything. look, the technique of the move is such a concept, even many there are conventionally the technique of domracheva's move. it is known. yes, there are also dinars. especially how important care technique is in that perspective, if you improve it, you will have those seconds

to eat on the track. you can argue like this, yes, yes, at a high level, an athlete of the world top-level levels always fight there for the smallest fraction of a second, he cares about every second, for example, mrtnov. he had one of the most ideal techniques at the expense of technique at the expense of the economy of his technique. he won a lot from those people , maybe, but physically they were stronger than him, but the technique. it depends on coordination on the speed of thinking from uh, how much you can control your body even today . every day, uh, i work on technology in order to catch the most economical. uh, the most economical moves for myself often see him in shooting practice. you are working under load, that is, relatively speaking, here are two options. i noticed you either shake something, ran to shoot, or i look , shot a small circle, made again when shooting. that is, these are two main, first positions. it’s just that i didn’t see anything else, and what to decipher them in, but let’s start with basic work. we do basic work in peace. we, uh, remove the maximum

of all our mistakes that are available in shooting, so as not to allow them already during the intensity. gradually add e, light intensity, moving on to competitive speed, that is, in a calm mode, it’s clear, but when you ’re sipping uh, pancakes and so on, this is exactly what is under load. yes, how do you conditionally model the approach to the boundary? yes, yes, gradually we come to light intensity. uh, after strength work, we shoot. eh, we already have it. this is so accepted, because after a good exercise, for example, there is a squat bashim from georgia with a good weight, for example, it will be hypertrophy, or maximum strength, and in the muscles there is a light trainer just such that you don't control it muscles constantly have movement somewhere 300 meters before the turn. you are already preparing yourself, because you will shoot, and a common mistake, and even i

had it. before, i just didn’t stop myself. i moved at a very high pace. uh, right up to the very carpet, then lay down and realized that this pulse. well, after this migazon come when the type of journalists ask how rate your race on it. in fact, it is very difficult to answer calmly, yes, because in my head, probably, the analysis at this moment is going on a lot. really goes if it's a good race. uh, of course there will be euphoria that you did everything right? you're satisfied with yourself and uh, you're satisfied with your job. uh, there are races that don't work out and you go and have already finished. you start to analyze what went wrong. uh, what could you have missed during the race, why did this happen in the olympic season? yes, i felt like i was right on a very good post olympic peak. well, logically, again mine. yes, you tell me by profession that it’s even possible to reduce the load somewhere, yes, give the body breathe. it can be done in a slightly different way. well, it was great if they could

just take off the load for one season and, uh, do practically nothing. in fact, the most difficult season is after the olympics because a lot of basic work is a lot of monotonous. long-term cyclical power lays down the most basic work so that in subsequent seasons you gradually apply speed, strength, and power there, so that in the olympic season you no longer think about how to train, so that you run in the olympic season. and when you the season begins relatively speaking, here is the summer part of the winter, how different these training cycles are, but they are tied, of course. at the starts, the gym goes into the background altogether, or for you, for example , the season remains from mid-november, when we choose hard strength work in the gym so that it does not interfere with our speed and our endurance. e, the cyclic load is reduced. well, in general

, the load is reduced by about 30-40% in general from the usual ordinary hours. olympic will return individually, the most such a heavy one brought us a medal, and as i understand it, even if we talk about the quality of shooting, ah, then this race is exactly what happened for you. yes, that is, we can say that you ran the race like a professional athlete. in general, on the eve of the race, we talked, even dinara and she said, uh, we will make the highest quality shot each straight. here's the shooting to

the finish line. that is, each shot must be, uh , so controlled that there are no such shots that you think of a shot later. oh what happened. eh, this happens a lot. there are laners, but the most important thing was my task, uh, to control every shot, so that , uh, zeroing the finish line. uh, those 50 shots. i spent about, well, 30 minutes for my warm-up. eh, this is the total time e. all my load, which was before the race. eh, that's how it started. i realized that i need to keep the pace a little lower than usual, because i still want to do 20 km, then i need to keep this speed by running. first round. eh, shooting clean. i understand that this tempo is not suitable for what i am comfortable on i can even add a second frontier somewhere a little bit. i drive up, and i shot cleanly in a more or less good condition, but i

understand that i am already standing, yet the mountains are coming, already the third frontier. the most interesting begins, there, only there, when fatigue sets in, when cardination comes on, when you no longer control your actions, the plot turned on automatism, which works in the summer. i ran to understand that i can’t shoot quickly, i also need slow. just as certain. i did everything clean. you can say, exhaled, because for me, prone shooting was that season. well, i was uncomfortable, i understood that now i have one line left, and everything depends only on me, eh, but in those conditions when i ran the race and i think, why is it so hard? again, again , it becomes even harder, yes, harder than they want. the pace has chosen, it seems to be comfortable during this race. i remember the feeling that i wanted to arrive at the border faster, to rest for these 25-30 seconds. eh, and here i come to the last frontier. uh,

i tried not to think about anything at all, to forget that i had, uh, 3 rubles. they went clean. i just approached without further thought. here, i see the installation, for example, there is a number such and such. i remember, i just got up without a single thought of doubt. i just got up from the fact that i was already tired, i just turned off on automatism and fired back, and then, when i threw the weapon, i realized that i had everything, well, everything worked out, and when roman came out to me , the wand screams, antoshka you are the leader, i think as a leader our today's broadcast goes out a day after the celebration of independence day in our country

, a big and important holiday for us, which we once again we emphasize the value for each of our native country, which has given a lot to any of us and in my opinion. we are obliged to respond and reciprocate. let's appreciate what we have and cheer for our athletes, who are well , the best see you in a week, bye. don't switch.

business and developing hospitable bright and festival generous picturesque and monumental sports and team events

we introduce you to active and inspiring people who live in belarus and do everything for its development, belarus can be different to understand and feel. she needs to be seen with her own eyes. tv viewers on the tv channel belarus 24 watch us every day, after all, we are doing, belarus is closer. hello, i welcome you and remind you. this is a program for those who want to better understand what is happening and understand how these processes

, events, people will affect the life of everyone in the life of the country, and the main events of world politics this week. let's tell you right now. alexander lukashenko played a decisive role in preventing a large-scale civil confrontation in russia, the president of belarus managed to conduct successful negotiations with the head of the private military company wagner yevgeny prigogine, as a result of which his fighters abandoned further illegal actions, thereby stopping the largest internal political crisis in russia in the last decade, which threatened with the most serious consequences, as for the russian people, and for the federal republic of belarus, putin and lukashenka are not a hero. we did our job, but we missed a lot and they didn’t even miss attached importance to this now no one needs to be imprisoned. i'm just talking to the russians. hurray as an agitator and no one is needed as a patriot

now there is no need to imprison anyone to shoot , it is necessary to cool down and turn this page. the republican majority in the us congress, as part of an investigation into the dubious business operations of the son of the american president , received the testimony of a witness who claims that joe biden was involved in the relevant scams , in particular, we are talking about a message sent in the summer of 2017 by hunter biden to one chinese businessman, in which he directly demands to pay him off and at the same time refers to his father's awareness of the situation. in addition, according to the witness, the fbi and the us department of justice deliberately blocked the investigation against biden jr. for several years and hid the information they had about his illegal actions. in the parisian suburb of nanterre, for several days there were riots and

clashes with the police, provoked by the murder of a seventeen-year-old teenager, a native of algeria, by police during the arrest while checking his documents, he tried to escape and was shot dead. this event stirred up the local large community of natives of north africa who began to smash shops and burn cars, the police, for their part, arrested almost two hundred rioters and actively used special means . thief, recidivist george floyd. british poet redial capping on the rivalry of the british the russian empire in asia, as you know, wrote only when everyone dies, the big game is over; it was easier for kipling in his time there were no nuclear weapons. now the words about everyone will die cease to be a hyperbole about why they don’t want to realize this in london and act

as the main instigators of a big war and will be discussed in today’s program to disperse the fog, albion’s foreign policy , viktor savelyevich will help me today. master of political science. hello and pavel feldman deputy director of the institute in strategic studies and forecasts candidate of political sciences associate professor, i am glad to welcome you to participate mutually igor england brie joins the broadcast artist international lawyer member of the writers' union of russia thank you very much for being with us today good afternoon, by tradition, we begin our program with a blitz expression of an englishwoman crap. i think it’s known, but each of us personally an englishwoman spoils you. state great britain well, not in relation to me personally, of course, in relation to the russian federation yes, they crap, at least from

the middle of the 16th century, and sometimes even diva is given for what? well, that's how our story is. britain, of course, did not invent political hypocrisy, but in this matter it has reached amazing perfection. igor, how would you answer this question. well, you know, returning to the english parafira, this expression is stable. he is another expression in his time. as the knights of the round said table. uh, the news, we learn from the royal pot, so here is such a two-digit story, despite which side to approach the knights have their own history of the queen's relationship with the rest of the world? i probably would not just, uh, center relations, but the anglo-saxon world and russia there, great britain and russia, starting here, as a colleague said, of the sixteenth century. i think that the attitudes towards great britain and its politics are approximately the same in many countries

of the world, where the british did not leave much of their legacy, and the traces shattered the map and accordingly, they are reaping the fruits of this very civil strife and on its colonialism. victor and what do you think this expression is applicable to the current circumstances to the current game is a big sin, rather the situation is somewhat different england really reached after the bourgeoisie during the revolution of the 17th century, where the rapid development began england reached absolute power in the 19th century, it created a gigantic empire where never set, the sun is the territory. the british empire with colonies and dominions reached thirty superfluous million square kilometers , that is, somewhere at least one and a half times more even than the soviet union and

concentrated huge financial resources in the middle of the 19th century, england produced about half of the world's industrial output. there , for the first time, the industrial revolution began at the end of the 16th century. and they were the first where this industrial revolution ended. that is, this absolute was mighty. such a monopoly country. and if we say there is, of course, for the last 100-150 years of power. uh, england has shrunk considerably. but england does not want to turn into a country of the second row, and she dreams of gaining a foothold in the first positions anyway, and especially the recent events in ukraine, especially now she has a chance to again become on a par with countries such as the usa china russia again to take the first positions. they have excellent genetic

memory. they have been the most powerful country for centuries and want to be at least among the first now, so they don’t shit, they fight for their place under the sun and you understand that there is another chance to rise. how it is the war in ukraine that they will not have. uh, you know, i think, when we describe the russian-british rivalry , the term big game is applied to this process, which is quite long historical. what is the big game, a small section of our diplomatic dictionary attention to the screen big game is a term describing the russian-british rivalry for dominance in central central asia in the period from 1813 to 1907. at this time, the russian empire motivated its expansion to the east by the desire to civilize the backward peoples of the middle asia to open a market for central asian goods, including cotton, and stop

the devastating raids of local peoples on its possessions. britain was afraid of rejection by india and the strengthening of the russian empire on the world stage. in connection with its possible access to the indian ocean through the version and afghanistan after 1907. the struggle for the influence of central asia it became a concern, exclusively british and russian diplomacy, both sides had to reckon with germany of modern history under the big game. many political scientists mean the struggle between nato and the sco for influence in central asia . and let's talk, after all, right now it is clear that the united kingdom has no longer an empire as an actor in world politics. at the moment, there are a lot of problems with the army , fleet, and economy. london is gradually losing its status as the main financial center. perhaps you will correct me if you do not agree, but at

the same time remains a serious player . great britain never left the world war. uh, it's just that at some point, maybe now she looks more like a player, but in fact her influence is political, and no less than it, maybe it was earlier in the uk yes , if you take it by itself, then it's just there, to me, the census of 21 years is 53 million, if my memory serves me, but if we take the population of the countries that are members of the commonwealth of great britain, then this is already more than two e, 2.2, in my opinion, but a billion of the population and now. how does great britain manage to control its former colonies, and the term colony itself, but went out of use. only since 2002, they have been replaced as dependent territories, but, nevertheless, this status of great britain as a crown that dominates within the commonwealth remains a new

wrapper that is present in the commonwealth. she has to admit it. and when a given, the british know how to beautifully package their product, whether it be a financial center or some kind of cultural cooperation, because within the commonwealth there are even commonwealth sports games, which, in my opinion, are not, but completed just recently. he says as if they are playing a very subtle game, because look what kind of bed i had , professional diplomacy and high-class intelligence help in this, if we are talking about the 21st century, and playing for a long time is part of the big game. this is not an instant result. this is a game of strategy. this is a game for the ages. and the ability to build controlled elites in controlled states. after all. we are talking about 53 million and what i wanted to emphasize. uh, what a large-scale gap of 53 million, the british against two almost two with

half a billion of the rest of the population, and this somehow needs to be controlled. how , by creating loyal kings, britain should be given its due. it very successfully emerged from its imperial colonial period of history much more successfully than london did, for example. the same moscow that invested colossal resources in its asian republics will not use the word colony. but london, on the contrary, has always pumped out resources, all the best juices, strength , money, labor resources from its colonies, but while moscow many regions that once belonged to the soviet union or its sphere of influence. they do not like, despite the help that they received. but london is largely idolized. and that's exactly what was said. this was achieved primarily through soft power. here the uk understood before others that it is possible to bet on it even before the americans, how to preserve the neo-

colonial system must be done so that in these former colonies the elites have their financial interests, their personal future, the future of their children was tied to the metropolis to london, and they achieved this, paradoxically, russia at a certain stage in its history in the nineties. at the beginning of the 2000s, it almost became the same, a la colony of great britain, because the russian oligarchs transferred all their resources of their children to london with their assets. they would probably continue to do so now. if the policy of the uk has not changed, but still worth noting. yes, that's how he perceives, and the layman is a simple layman, the viewer, the information that we now hear from great britain yes, over the past 2 years in london there have been three premieres and an office or a rhinestone in general. it seems to me that i remember only the farewell to the queen and the catastrophic collapse of the fullt. and yet, as a result of such upheavals, britain does not

leave the race. although neither china nor russia is the same, the republic of belarus here they can not imagine. to be allowed to have such a leapfrog to which sometimes it develops in the managerial litas. and at the same time relatively confidently go their own course. and i think that victor will agree with pavel and igor with regards to the fact that albion has both certain instruments and sterling in the broadest sense, which does not care who sits e yes at the address of an old color, 10 absolutely, it does not matter here. you're talking about managerial, uh, structures. well, it's formally the prime minister. they play far from the first violin. and there it doesn't matter who will be there? uh, boris johnson who was more into parties there. we remember uh, i used to go forever shaggy or a sheet of times, which is generally for management, well, very far from management, or that's less often a sunk, which now comes from

from a hindu environment, being the most ethnic hindu, he fit perfectly into the english elite. these are all high-ranking let's say less real power. this closed society is the elite. it can be said the aristocracy, which still dates back to the 17th century, the eighteenth. and these are all performers, so this leapfrog absolutely does not play any role. and the fact that the pounds will rise, then fall or some other problems is all a trifle, because the uk has more powerful than experienced for the job. these are diplomats and financiers and industrialists and military sphere. no matter how weak it is somewhere. they have colossal colossal potential igor then the question arises.

but what is dictated by this stable view, which now we are increasingly seeing in practice, the historical super -task of great britain, the fight against russia, who is the gunner of this conflict, well, to name , perhaps, a specific event, uh, which i influenced was a trigger, uh modern uh, events. i'm probably at a loss to say, but i will say the following: here, but in the development of the thesis. uh, fellow monarchy, be it a presidential republic of a parliamentary republic. this is just a form of government more important than the principle of government until now, human civilization follows the elitist principle of government, that is, and societies are controlled by elites. accordingly, it is necessary to look where interests lie. elite conservatives. whether it is volleyball players is completely unimportant sheet. boris jones is all minor changes. how could we not it would seem that such dramatic changes are taking place in english society, nothing of the kind society. the guitar part of this society itself

is very stable. all the interests of great britain are directed outward on the control of international sea routes of communications on the control of the resource base, as i said, and here at some point they probably did not have such a global rival player until the russian empire started its own expansion in the struggle for an exit. to the seas, the expansion of their presence for security purposes in central central asia, and here the british saw their rivals in russia. moreover, we will not forget that the dynastic russian empire was very close to the english crown, and yet this did not prevent the english crown from seeing russia as the first and foremost enemy. gibraltar must be controlled the suez canal must be controlled by the poor these folklore islands. these

rocks in the atlantic ocean also need to be controlled, it turns out, and great britain went to war with argentina and achieved its goal there, but regained its control, that is, nothing of the 17th century changed the globe, as it looked bottleneck? so he remains for these bottlenecks for the straits for the steamers for communications. uh, there is a serious fight ahead, and the accelerator, in fact, may be a. in the northern sea route, after all, this is a real alternative to the very communications that the saxon world controls. and if we manage to create an uninterrupted channel, and messages bypassing the british american military bases, then the world economy will be arranged in a completely different way. well, who would like to lose it, and among them got out in this way, but there is a prerequisite in the form of global warming, so that they do not talk about the technological position of russia, but russia

is a country with the most powerful icebreaker fleet. and the combination of the icebreaker fleet with global warming can really create objective conditions for the logistics of international trade to seriously change not in favor of america and great britain by the way, in russia there is an interesting historical hypothesis explaining this centuries-old conflict, supposedly, well, in the order of the legend, ivan the terrible at one time, offered the british she rudely refused the queen or the covenant to conclude di brat with him, and since then this conflict has been on the rise, but john vasilyevich did not accept this refusal. although it would be interesting to agree that the configuration of international relations would have developed. well , it turned out that it did not last long. this configuration is the century after all. eh, what was the world alignment on the seas? eh, they were not ruled by great britain, but by portugal and spain, and, probably, elizabeth could have acted a little wiser. by the way, it was the only the woman with whom ivan the terrible officially corresponded to the question of all men

refused. why yes, well, not only refused him, as if he did everything he could against him, such was her female will from phenomena, and then yes , there were objective contradictions in geopolitics , many are not considered a science, but nonetheless. why persia why turkey became a stumbling block? and because of the trade routes, because of the straits, but because of the movement. bars and warships, and i must say , britain much earlier mastered not only technologies of soft power, but also tools of this uncontrollable chaos. let’s remember how it unsuccessfully agitated, it turns out that turkey against russia excited the whole world against the soviet union, probably more anti-soviet than the british regime since churchill’s time. well, we certainly didn’t have a look today at the relationship between great britain and europe, today they are open competitors. and

if we say that the united states is playing to weaken the european union, but london also makes it even more willing to break, yes, relations with the european union after loud brekt. although naturally, we understand that this is such a controversial issue. was this desire so sharp, or is it such an accident yes, a stone on the road can change colleagues wondered who the british are with in the world now good dob wearing i’m not talking about celites between the british and former colonial leaders, the oligarchs, but with the peoples so, probably, the same, er, difficult problems exist. london has not only with moscow there or minsk e. well, first of all, with paris its closest neighbors the french across the english channel. who can be dearer to them than what people in the world love the british today oleg voloshin ukrainian politician candidate of political sciences oleg is joining us greetings you in the studio we are talking today in

the uk they have a simple relationship. yes, it is extremely difficult today with the russian federation and, naturally, they recalled the term englishwoman crap. here, in your opinion, is what motivates the british political class to engage in such a militant anti-russian position. well, it seems to me, uh, the root of the problem here, in addition to, uh, actually historical , uh, some. eh, allusions, indeed, and a great tradition. e confrontation between britain and russia at different times. although, again , let's not forget that in all the key wars a , when it was really about the possibility of establishing one force of total hegemony in the world by military means. this is napoleon, for example, or the kaiser's nazi germans, germany and britain, russia were on the same side. well, in general, in general. i heard there extreme husk discussion and i will not go into it there and expand it, but i would, of course

, i am an ardent opponent of anglophobia, like any other phobia, not to mention the fact that let's be frank to everyone, we somehow, who taught at school, started the first foreign language english, probably, to some extent all the same, and more or less opinions are educated people of the soviet space. basically, it said. really key factors. this is indeed the exit of britain from the eu britain began to look for its place in the world. and uh on actually found. well, a certain part, to be exact. the elite need to understand that e after all in e. the conflict around our country around ukraine is mainly involved in the intelligence community and, to a large extent, the military elite, not so britain even got involved in a confrontation with russia with ukraine and around ukraine, how many of those who were in power resigned cases and due to the thoughtlessness of us ukrainian voters gave their helm of the state government agreed take british protectors over you. that is, it is not so much the success of the british diplomacy. how much, uh, and the venality that

zelensky's team, which yes, let's talk about this in more detail now victor well , you will agree that in the current political alignments. if i may. so to put it, britain plays an important role, and how much it provokes ukraine is obvious to all players. in my opinion. she plays the first role in the degree. aggressiveness in terms of the degree of desire to incite more and more conflict in ukraine and great britain overtakes even the united states of america well to talk about, for that, by chance in ukraine there were some forces such, uh, that the uk had a protectorate over them. this is not entirely correct in ukraine, these forces. including great britain, they were preparing, for many decades great britain actively supported the bandera people even after the war. e, transferred money to them , weapons, means of communication, e, established contacts through canada through its other

dominions. that is, great britain was actively pumping nationalism into soviet ukraine. it started to get even more active. ninety-two thousandth years, logically , this led to yushchenko's orange revolution and that's all. this led mr. poroshenko zelensky well and maidan 14 years old. do you agree with viktor's position, please give you the floor eyewitnesses of many political events of the iranian republican army, in general, if it comes to that of the irish ter. that it's normal in a geopolitical confrontation , that is, uh, of course, on the other side, but don't you know u count uh, what is normal you know in a fighting match, a good hook. uh, for whoever did it an achievement for whoever got it is a failure this is, let's not demonize the british about recognizing their strengths and look for ways to counteract. and so. the main thing i want to say is, yes, randomness why, because objectively speaking, great britain today

is not e, not something that superpowered, but even a full-fledged great power, it has no resources, no money proper, no military capabilities to unilaterally rule . e. especially, perhaps, a region remote from it? in general, not your atypical not a presence for her. this is not the middle east and its traditional britain, but strong ties with the elites. this is not, and there, southern africa, not from other regions, what mr. zelensky yermak got in october of the twentieth year. acceptance by the head of mi-6, mr. moore, and there , in fact, well, this condition was actually recruited and agreed to follow the course of mi-6 in everything. this is indeed a lucky coincidence. i want to draw your attention again. yes, in the uk in general. naturally, like poland , yes, and in uh, in nine out of ten cases. e will probably be in some confrontational situations against russia, but the fact that now it is in ukraine in relation to which, and

for years, much greater influence of finance, and through the elites and so on, that the united states, naturally and further than germany, had the first violin plays. ah, the british. this is the result of the fact that mr. yermak , who is actually the ruler of ukraine, is the right hand of zelensky, but he actually decides, as some of us are considered to be a direct agent of mi6. thank you interesting, bright enough position you know the leader of the republic of belarus, alexander lukashenko, has repeatedly stated that it is not zelensky who is leading the whole process, but representatives of the west . britain . the united states has completely taken control of the military operation. and prime minister of england johnson two phones. that's basically how it's managed. these two

leaders yes. and you definitely mentioned oleg. on october 7-8, 2020 , a fateful and in many respects tragic for the future of ukraine, the meeting of president volodymyr zelensky with the head of british intelligence michel richard moore, according to zelensky, it was the british country that said that ukraine had a big problem with the fact that the media are financed not only by ukrainians, and therefore the main question, which was discussed just about that there should be independent media that today, when there is a war in ukraine, protect ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity. you know, paul is in this and, uh , some incredible dilemma, because for many ukrainians who voted for zelensky, this was a man who, naturally, but promised peace, promised the end of the war and set it as the goal of his

presidency, and a few months later, as if this mask had been torn off, and under him they saw a completely different one, and this one meeting in london did she really switch this toggle switch in the head of the ukrainian leader. well, after all, i'm not schooling to believe in the power of one meeting. even at this level, especially since she was far from the only one, i remember. how many times zelensky conducted negotiations with boris johnson, a complex of factors played a role here, but what did you absolutely correctly note for zelensky, most of the russian speakers voted for zelensky? ukraine eastern ukraine as a future president of the world who will solve the problem of donbass in one way or another? and by the way, at a certain stage. it seemed to me personally that he was trying to remember, for example, there were, uh, negotiations with president putin in the minsk format. and then, probably, more than ever, there were hopes that this conflict could be resolved through diplomacy, but certain powers. wrapped up. it is in the

saddest possible scenario one of these centers of power is by far london second to washington next on the list. what i completely agree with viktor is that britain is number one in general in the forefront of modern anti-russian politics, and we in russia often consume such a concept of red lines. now i would say in a crow's context, because western partners systematically cross, and in russian society. there is a feeling that power is not tight enough at the intersection of these red lines. reacts like this first. this is what the british always do. they were the first to deliver modern long-range anti-robber missiles to ukraine. they supplied them with missiles of the class. land beating today poluganskaya donetsk. they gave them tanks, challenger and the rest of the western countries. you see that the red lines can be crossed. following the example of the uk , they are being pulled up, so we must pay tribute to the pans. ku, i would even tell the enemy

of courage, they have enough today. they are not afraid to escalate with one of the largest nuclear powers and this is a challenge that moscow will respond to. do the british understand perfectly, or do they want to stay afloat? yes, i don’t agree that they are small there, the power of the british, the great power, despite the fact that they are a small country, because they have these huge dominion former colonies. these elites, fed britain plays a much bigger role than they are on the political map. the vatican also has a not very big country, however, the vatican stands by the power of many huge countries, so britain is in this plan. now the last and decisive battle they have or they defeated from russia with the help of the united states and other allies, including our republic of belarus, will inflict a crushing defeat and will again shine in world history. if this fails, then britain and

then finally. uh, already out of the arena and really can turn into a minor country. you know, uh, viktor, president of ukraine volodymyr zelensky , came to the uk last month to meet with examples. rishi sunnakom. target visit. it is understandable that the british prayed for the supply of new weapons, despite the fact that britain has become one of the main suppliers of weapons equipment kiev, we are today the united states which one? zhenya supplies london to ukraine and how important it is at the moment is detailed in our story from the very beginning of russia's special operation in ukraine, britain has become one of the main suppliers of weapons equipment to kiev, so last month long -range missiles were sent to ukraine with a range of more than 250 km for comparison american missiles can to overcome only 80 in this way

, it was london who became the first to supply cruise missiles to kiev, and as stated in russia , ukraine has already begun to use them, britain has also begun. the first country to supply the kiev regime with main battle tanks that are in service in nato countries, we are talking about 14 challenger-2 tanks, as well as about thirty self-propelled artillery mounts, it was the deliveries of tanks that could influence germany, which nevertheless agreed to provide ukraine with a leopard 2 , according to many military analysts, tanks in combination. with other weapons systems will be vital to any attempt by ukraine to dislodge russian troops from entrenched positions in the expected offensive. in addition, london announced the delivery of hundreds of attack drones, a range of more than 200 km and air defense missiles according to experts drones can be particularly effective for supplying troops on the front line, especially under russian artillery fire and in conditions

where there is a risk of encirclement, also from england, kiev received anti-tank missiles portable weapons for the destruction of bunker fortifications are helmets and bulletproof vests. but even this is only a small part of what the uk has already sent or is about to send to ukraine, and according to experts, such multimillion-dollar spending in london speaks of a direct benefit of the kingdom in the russian-ukrainian conflict. oleg tell me, please, could you imagine a few years ago that the key partners for ukraine would be the uk. why is the united states present in this story? well, you know i think the dirty deeds of the democrats and the biden family. we will remember again and again. and why it is beneficial for them this story. and that's why britain is just about tunisia, just the united states is present everywhere, because it is really a lonely superpower trying, but painfully, to fight for

the preservation of its japan and it is natural for it. e, this has been said, retold dozens of times, we will not repeat it. i think our respected viewers, in principle, understand that for the united states, any weakening russia and through which one sees the possibility of relaxing the tandem of russia china but is important and beneficial, at least. in any case, something could not be left out of the attempt. e moscow to solve in a radical way. the problem she had with ukraine was to get the loyalty of the government in kiev, as far as the uk is concerned, why about tunism? yes, because it’s correct to say alexander grigorievich really lukashenka about the fact that there is natural that she has a direct connection with washington, then you care if biden wants communicate regularly with zelensky. that is the question, but i know for sure that it is not, but, because, uh, zelensky is well known there. all its features. all his weaknesses are the corruption of the regime, and this is his passion for all kinds of illegal drugs and everything else. yes, fuck there , to be honest, firstly, as the president of a superpower who has problems through the roof and others who else to talk to, and secondly,

uh, well, we all know. at what service age are the most gentleman, bayd, they are here here is soprotism in the sense that there is more to do. that's just the british and we noticed, by the way, that three prime ministers have already been steadily replaced, each subsequent uh, more and more active. well, if they are more active , too, a little more cunning, of course, than blist or johnson. well, it's enough to consistently play on this field, they play ro. really such lawyers and key lobbyists. ah, the escalation of confrontation, that is, they are not too lazy, but they are not too lazy to pick up the phone and call zelensky, and it was right to lobby interest from zelensky to dissuade other leaders it is said in the studio that britain is such an icebreaker, but what are 14 tanks, but right on the scale of the current front. this is generally nonsense. it is really thanks to the supply of these four of these fourteen, it was possible to get there under a hundred, and already leopards. and, maybe there will be more, and indeed britain, uh, is playing. here the role

is played by the fact that, in general, no one wants e big confrontation with russia, the americans. in fact, they cannot but participate in it, but without dna we can see it very well. but the british are really involved with a big twinkle, the appearance of this twinkle in the eyes. i would say that the hypothesis that the british on the territory of ukraine competes not only with russia but also with america is in order. that in succession four prime ministers of this country support and give arms to kiev, they are all representatives of the same party , the conservative party expresses the old british elite, expresses the interests of the old british elite, and this old british elite even treats the americans a little arrogantly. i would even say revanchist, so it is very important for london today to in contrast, as a colleague with a sluggish and not very capable biden said quite rightly, they show that they are brave guys , that they are not afraid to escalate, even with such a powerful center of power, the horse is

moscow, and in this respect they are much decisive of the united states of america all- yet with hmm the colossal military potential of london well, probably, it is not comparable to the american one, and these guys act more boldly than washington, they show great political will and decisiveness, and thus britain quietly on in contrast to its former colony, it is regaining that role. in the big game that hope said at the beginning, which was lost during the cold war. she is returning and will have to be reckoned with as a new center of power no less significant than washington victor , please, tell me, naturally, for any person. yes, at least a little interested in history. and when we talk about great politicians. yes, modernity or the twentieth century, the surname naturally arises in the head, the image of winston churchill, as it were if he had the opportunity to look at what is happening

, he reacted to this. well, i think that churchill, if he had been resurrected, would have reacted with great pleasure to this whole picture, they were churching. it was the worst enemy of russia and especially the soviet union, the church did everything to ignite a civil war in the territory of the former russian empire. he dreamed of strangling bolshevik russia and, having been defeated , he did everything between the wars to do as much harm as possible and slow down the development of the soviet union, and therefore the post-war years. churchill has always been an enemy. only when germany began to threaten the years of the second world war, then the draftsmen already deigned to cooperate with the soviet union, but as soon as the war was ending and there were still a couple of weeks left before the end of the war, he already made an unthinkable plan to deal with

the former to launch a war against the soviet union with defeated german units, but the americans opposed it, because it was already too unthinkable, therefore, when they would now see what they were doing. e hmm, this is happiness that we managed to unleash a full-scale war on the territory of the former soviet union and how the british are actively involved, he would say even bolder. the vessel and the english elites are even more active and we must say to finish off, while it is possible, there is in russia. that's how he said. and i remind you that on the air the program sas is authorized to announce that we are talking about a new big game. oleg voloshin, oleg is in touch with us here. please tell me what can change this position of britain that we are talking about today in the program somewhat in order of risk,

naturally, subjected to criticism respected. uh, guests of your studio, but by the way, i looked up at the bookshelf on my desk. it stands there. actually the book fights the johnson factor, churchill of course. naturally, johnson dreamed very much and wanted to be like churchill and wrote, as for me, one of the best e books about this really great british politics, and i do not argue. on the one hand, i agree that churchill is a fool and situations. and of course, would be there, uh, there is no jones johnson let's say more than he was a man, like this jeans of centuries were called and would probably help the enemies of russia and china, and on the other hand, all the same, if we already remember about history about the era when the check really lived without you , if so, then support the british establishment line. uh, churchill on the consistent support of the white movement. we would have the white guards, they would have won in general, then there would have been no ukrainian soviet socialist republic and there would have been no ukraine having vladimirovich lenin, as putin has been calling her lately, and

probably all the wavy counterattacks would not have was. so, to be honest, russophobes should not be called churchill. i like a person who deeply regrets that civil war. here in russia it ended the way it ended, i think that it would be better if they listened to churchill and, as for, and how to change this position. uh, britain now. yes, probably, in no way i can only say that the british really use it very competently, so that it is correct to say that in the event of any response from russia, it will be systemic, some kind of large-scale, especially military, but let's say this answer. e will affect, including the united states , therefore, of course, the british are very comfortable and easy to take risks, realizing that big guys from the ocean are getting into a big fight. in this sense, of course, they are well aware of this, but for themselves the report is that russia cannot simply respond to britain without hooking the united states, because britain is so significant for the united states and therefore even

discuss these options. although now the submission of the respected mr. karaganov. e into the discussion is not merged reasoning about the primitive nuclear strike, but i would not play these games differently, i’ll just note by analogy. here i have, as in international relations, and first of all, the political science of international relations about the education of a diplomat, but it seems that there are associations with a very competent line today, which is being pursued by the beast republic of belarus e. everyone knows that alexander lukashenko has such a name that, unlike many in moscow, he has a critical situation there, the hand is not a friend and the opinion of alexander lukashenko is the leader. to the public, belarus about whether the hand will tremble or not, please, they are all still leading to a third world war, but they are terribly afraid of it. i know this for sure, but i have met people who play an important role in this and make radical cardinal and final decisions in case they are most afraid. it's

sincerely all about it. they say. ah, nuclear disasters. they are afraid of this, they are afraid of the use of nuclear weapons in ukraine, what are they? god forbid russia will do it and so on and so forth. well, it's natural. we don't want either. we are also afraid, we want to live, because that this could lead to a specialist, world disaster and a bead. maybe from orbit, if all these weapons explode, they ask a question. here you know the leadership of russia , be friends, say yes or no. i say, yes, nuclear weapons in order to press or press the button, let's press the button. and how, well, in one case, if you make a very dangerous move in the sense that you invade the territory of russia and this will threaten the existence of russia, in a word. if you put putin against a wall or in a corner in drive it in and there will be no other way out from the corner,

only forward. may go out. then wait until then. eh, there's still a possibility. let's agree, but they don't let volodya zelensky reach an agreement. yes, and he himself is good, although, uh, i ’m sure they have such information that in ukraine today i’ll tell you right now, you won’t explode. there in ukraine today, the vast majority of people want to end the war. and this is a terrifying fortune-telling on a daisy of the current western leaders will press or not press, and now they really have already forgotten about possible red lines, because all of them have already been destroyed. paul, please, well, everyone has already put themselves in churchill's place. i just can't help but do it, and then i will answer your question. i think, of course, in general, he would be pleased with what is happening and support the policy of his conservative party, which is being implemented by sunok, but he would hardly be happy that ukraine

would use neo-nazis as a taran against russia. still. let's give churchill his due . he was one of the main enemies of fascism in the history of mankind, the man who saved britain from the fascist turn to which she, uh, at the behest of her elite. came very close at the time. as for these, the notorious red line. it's clear. that that red button, a, which is said so much in moscow, is in the hands of the president of the russian federation, but i am sure with all his might, e does not want to press it. he, probably, relies on the will of the russian people, if he wanted to, he could have done it long ago, where the first will say to grief, it is all fire. it seems to me that they can say so in russia and in this game, who the first one will roll the first one will blink, looking into each other's eyes. the west is taking a very big risk, because once again i want to say to the russian people, well, let it sound harsh in this studio, nevertheless, it has already given the president

a mandate to use nuclear weapons. many are wondering. why hasn't it been uncovered yet? and so, therefore, in the western center of power, the track was probably thoroughly thinking about how much you can tease the nuclear bear , sooner or later the notorious red lines will be completely right in front. you know pavel and we, of course, naturally, now we perceive the west as the west, which is actually one among, but frightening, yes. on the tough and militant rhetoric of hmm, quite sound, adequate and wise thoughts are also visible. i would like you and i to pay attention to the statement of the member of the european parliament clairlie. let's listen together you need to constantly ask yourself. whose interest is the prolongation of the war, it is obvious that it is not the interest of the ukrainians. whose blood is shed on the battlefield? whose cities are being destroyed and whose relatives and friends are forced to leave

the country for the inhabitants of ukraine - this is not stopping. horrifying attempts to start the process of peace negotiations were already made in april last year, however, we. it is known that the us and british governments strongly opposed this idea. yes, this was an exclusive commentary for the sas program, it was authorized to declare it was recorded in strasbourg, and then indeed clardale said that it was britain that yes in march 2022, together with the united states, but were those players who did not pushed ukraine and, on the contrary, moved away from the world and the cessation of hostilities victor well , i want to say do not underestimate. uh, western countries and western leaders. if they think that they are used to sitting in cafes and comfort, if necessary, they will go to a nuclear war and, most likely, they will go to a nuclear war. these are people who for centuries sailed on pirate ships died, well

, they robbed and cannot but rob the whole world for 500 years , the british, then the united states we remember reagan, who said that there are things more important than the world and who managed to bend over and in the end. the soviet union collapsed , it was the old party nomenklatura that got scared from moving away and the soviet union was destroyed. the same thing is happening with the current russian federation, constant concessions, a red line. correctly, paul has already turned into some kind of irony. they think if we destroyed the soviet union why can't we destroy the russian federation which is five times weaker than the soviet union why do we have such power now and england is rising from the usa powerful and in general collective smell. and also china, we have to do something with china, so they think that they are afraid that they are some kind of comfort for them now, uh, one task is to maintain

world domination, or they will retain it, or they will roll back and eventually fall apart . therefore, there is no peace here, so that they will not go to the world, the world is in the most severe confrontation. i think that tactical nuclear weapons will be used on both sides, at least we need to prepare for this. and especially in our republic of belarus, we have such a high balcony here. here you have to prepare the russian federation and the west are in a confrontation. nobody will turn. it will not turn into some kind of peaceful korea there in 1953, or what, now the stakes are already very high, and they will grow, oleg , but tell me, i often hear the position of some belarusian experts that stop tolerating this, let's strike with a weapon with a nuclear polondon . here's how you feel about such a position. and which one

, in your opinion, is correct in the current geopolitical game? well, let's be responsible for our words. well, now they should see our program and bunkers to restart all the children and look for her iodine there . uh, as putin clearly said, and this can be seen in general, in russia they are afraid to carry out even mass mobilization, obviously, assessing the readiness of a mass ordinary russian and dying simply with a gun in their hands. i would doubt that there is really a russian leadership there. again, so clear. lukashenka correctly said if there is a threat to the exam, that is, a direct invasion of the territory of the russian federation threatening the very existence of the russian federation but roughly speaking, for melitopol or berdyansk no one nuclear war. i will not untie. eh, and

you need to understand this very well, when they started a special operation from something, they went off, made mistakes and made stupid openings. a bunch of shortcomings of the russian army will be gradually corrected, but i think that putin, who started it all, will certainly not say, but for the guys we are so weak that, apart from a nuclear bomb, we have nothing, after all, let's be frank reasoning about nuclear weapons, a sign of weakness. that is, it’s like there are no more other tools left. the fact that sergei alexandrovich taganov, as an extremely competent international affairs officer, threw an intellectual provocation. this is one thing that needs to be said about the fact that a nuclear conflict in the event of certain levels of escalation. in principle, it is possible that this is correct, but to talk about whether the drone flew to the kremlin let's talk about this on a cedar bomb. ask, did you even go there? sorry for being rude. what kind of nonsense? of course not, there are thousands of humiliations that russia can endure to win a thousand times after that, but a nuclear war can only be cut once, and i’m glad, of course, they didn’t give russia, after all, not

a bear who lives by instincts, but a wise thinking person, and at the head of the republic of belarus also then let's not. emotions, let's reassure our people , there will be no nuclear war. we do not give in to emotions. i personally am also deeply convinced that this will not happen, by the way, there is one more reason, in addition to all those voiced, there is china with which moscow also supports minsk warm economic and political relations and they are unlikely to remain so warm and friendly if moscow uses nuclear weapons. i think that senzinpin made a very unambiguous statement about this during direct negotiations with president putin regarding nuclear weapons in general. eh, be it tactical. it does not give any advantage within the framework of the armed company that is now unfolding in ukraine, it will not solve everything, the complex of the problem will not help achieve the goals of the special military operation is demilitarization, denocification of nuclear weapons - this is primarily a political system

of checks and balances, which should theoretically cool the hot heads here. hot heads there on the other side of the ocean or the english channel and to make sure that some kind of tragic apocalypse does not happen on the wise words of our esteemed guests of today's discussion, we put an end to the end of the program. i would like to recall kipling again and, as we remember , vladimir putin has repeatedly admitted that from childhood he loves the work of this briton from the ballad about east, west reserve. yes, many people quote kipling’s words west and west, east, there is east and they won’t leave the place, but they forget the last lines of the work, but there is no east and west, that the motherland tribe is a people, if a strong one stands face to face at the edge of the earth , let’s hope albion will give the world , a leader who has the wisdom of strength to negotiate with the east and stop humanity from sliding

into the abyss. thanks a lot. it was the program. sasha is authorized to declare. the englishwoman is shitting, because she does not find a place for herself at the table of the great powers. two teams a lot of tricky questions and a tower, the construction of which is better to avoid which cohen in france poppy poppy in romanian in england and how this bird screams with us adults. what do ilya stilyagin and vladimir stilyagi do well, i accept your answers - this is the correct answer. and the most important and most pleasant thing about this is that you don’t have to go to the construction site, because the top element is installed. so absolutely the entire intellectual entertainment show

tower will move out. what is the name of a light appetizer made from mozzarella tomatoes olive oil and basil, and pitizer? vision, in which the image of distant objects is not formed on the retina, but is formed in front of it and intrigue alone. i accept you understand on belarus 24 tv channel. belarus is endless forests. blue rivers lakes pristine nature from which it is impossible to take your eyes off and belarus is also people. and we reveal their destinies to you. we carry

traditions through the generation and at the same time change our views on familiar things. all this makes the world a better place. we tell you different people, but they are united by one love for belarus 24 theta, and our officers play a decisive role in strengthening.