[000:00:00;00] the hockey player replenished the roster of the bison in august last year, last season for 73 fights forward scored 43 points 21 goals and 22 assists , efficiency plus two in merkles became the best sniper of the team according to the results of the regular season coyote, new jersey morons and san jose sharks, total in total he played 41 matches of the strongest world league victoria zarin karina sobolenko continues her performance in singles at the wimbledon grand slam tournament at alexandra sosnovich. the fight ends at the stage of the second round, losing to the czech vitova 2.6, she went to 1/8 and defeated the russian kasatkina 6.2.6.4. and here is sobolenko. it was harder, but as a result of the victory in three sets over the frenchwoman rook 2675 62 arina in 1/16. as a result, more than two thousand athletes from 22 countries will come to the second game of the cis countries

, the minister of sports and that said. sergei kovalchuk in a conversation with journalists today, on the basis of the shooting complex named after marshal timoshenko , the republican tournament in shooting from of pneumatic weapons among workers of physical culture, sports and tourism, the participants competed in shooting from a pistol and a rifle in a conversation with the media, the minister of industry once again noted the high degree of readiness of the facilities for the competition and stressed that inspections at sports complexes will be carried out right up to the very beginning of the games today , 22 sides already say. uh, a certain degree of readiness is already about 2,000 athletes. this is approximately the result that we initially based on then planned this event. their. you can prove even more now that's 2 weeks before the start. we 'll take a control detour. let's look at each object. let's say this is the last one. so ready for the event, but i can assure you that today is practically.

all our facilities are already of the highest degree of readiness for organizing this event. for the first time, the games of the cis countries will be held from august 4 to 14 in 11 cities of belarus on july 5 , medals and uniforms for athletes were presented at an official press conference in the city hall of the capital and competition staff. a fuller coverage of sports news in our nightly edition,

see you soon. take care of yourself. hello this is the club of editors on channels belarus 1 and belarus 24, as always we are talking about the most important events of the week, don't be surprised, uh, the hosts of the club of editors of the head of the belteleradiocompany ivan

mikhailovich eisman are on a planned vacation, no conspiracy theories and according to the draw that we held among the regular participants the club fell to spend it today to me and let me introduce other participants in today's conversation. dmitry zhuk, belarus today nadezhda sas tv presenter stv journalists andrey krivosheev director general of the minsk news agency chairman of the belarusian union of journalists. donin alekseev. bc analyst marat markov, chairman of the board of the second national tv channel. the week turned out to be full of many events on the third of july. we all celebrated independence day, and belarus had an important event on the mound of glory, then a concert at the bolshoi theater, and many congratulations received from the leaders of other states. uh, a law on the media was adopted, or rather published

, with very significant amendments that are being made to the functioning of our information space. but the most important thing is the president's big press conference, uh, this thursday. in general, all the main topics that we are discussing, which are being discussed around the world, have become a subject, and this consideration is up-to-date information on the deployment of tactical nuclear weapons and relations with the russian federation relations with ukraine problems of war and peace coming themselves there nato future presidential elections in the republic of belarus and in the russian federation us policy european union new world order, of course, pmc wagner where can we go without this topic, but you know, e that drew attention. at this round table at the head of state, completely

different journalists gathered from different political ideological positions from people who regularly travel to donbass to cover events. we saw there both lyudmila gladnaya and xenia, uh, the swan, but on the other hand, this you know, western mastodons, toothy like matthew chanza. steven rosenberg we know their style. if you can call it that, in my opinion, it is only possible in minsk now that people with such different views with such different, probably tasks, settings would gather around the same table, and the president of the republic of belarus can answer these questions absolutely on an equal footing. level of discussion. uh, hope you participated in this conversation. how do you like the atmosphere that has developed? i am first first of all, i want to say that this format was really unique and minsk proved to be personally alexander grigoryevich lukashenko as

a platform and alexander grigoryevich as a leader in the first place, who stands for openness, because today, when we have already forgotten about all the red lines, when indeed, according to the president. we are well aware that the world is rather crazy and any dialogue is extremely necessary, and that the table gathered, of course, rather than the enemies of the republic of belarus of the russian federation and at the same time, the conversation took place - this is the merit of the president of the republic of belarus. i will tell you. yes, you know, here, again, i watched all those present and when and here, for example. they sat down at the table and there were sweets nearby. here is a journalist. uh, cnnet, you know a very caustic joke. wow, these kgb switz kgb sweets. and i answered him. you know , eat, eat don't choke, because the president is written on the sweets. that's exactly what i wanted to answer. well, probably, if somewhere in the white house there was

a press conference in america, there would obviously be candy with cocaine, that, no cookies, but you know, given the number of scandals with hunter biden and the presence of cocaine in the white house. it still, uh, plays an important role. of course, i admire alexander grigorievich's self-possessed diplomacy , because a many noted that 70% of the questions concerned the dude. and you know, it's more like, uh, a manifestation of the stupidity and stupidity of the western media when you had the opportunity to ask about anything and you each you asked the same question and, you know, even one of the british asked, say putin was really going to wet the prigozhin. well, i don’t know what reality they live in, and rather all this is a game for some of them, or, again, a search for a sensation. but the president has repeatedly stressed that, unfortunately, we are faced with a completely unthinkable reality and how to get out of it. so much wisdom

is absolutely, balanced sound decisions can save a person. i want to apply as the chairman of the union of journalists. here, uh, representatives of u gathered at this press conference usa russia uk france arab region saudi arabia qatar and well-known belarusian journalists. there, uh, there were representatives of these media who have made requests for a meeting with the president not for the first time. there really was a queue, but still this is the new reality that nadezhda says . after all, this is not the first time we are faced with this. we remember a big conversation with the president, when western journalists, as if according to one training manual, are the same. woke up journalism is it bet? e hopefully. this is not stupidity. this is not even a degradation of professional standards and skills is a manual when people who for some reason consider themselves journalists carry out absolutely propaganda orders, trying to swing an experienced politician. uh, the person who

makes the real decision including life and death decisions are key decisions. e of those that it is generally possible to accept this is just a training manual and yes, they perform the training manual in an unprofessional stupid and banal way. well, not so much here. i would like to emphasize the professional level, to be honest, we don’t care about our colleagues. i'm here with this french consent. if there are still 10-15 years ago, we looked at them and tried to see the very samples of world professional journalism that we were told about at universities 20 years ago and even then they did not find it. i would perhaps, by the way, nadezhda, you will argue with me, to emphasize the tone with which western journalists began to speak, in my opinion. he seemed to me like that, and pleading, so ingratiating, forgivable yet, 2 years ago, a year ago, this did not come to

rudeness and insults. uh, and yes just not professionally worded questions in assertion format. and here it's forgivable. i want to emphasize. this is not the position of journalists. this is most likely in such a tone e to the belarusian president, realizing his powers, sovereignty and ability to decide. er, the main questions are addressed by the people behind the journalists, that is, the elites of those states and blocs that were represented at this round table. and i think that the time has come already in such a public media field to rethink for ours. partners e, independence , sovereignty and significance of belarus in the region, but here, too, our partners need to be sensibly assessed, they may be excusably fawning there, and then, when they come out, they interpret the absolutely honest, open information that they received from the president of belarus, they begin there, as they say, little nuances, and dmitry alexandrovich before

i can't give you the floor to wish you a happy birthday. thank you july 7 is your main day, so thank you for coming to us today. do you know what i wanted to say? here's matthew chantz. steve rosenberg of course that first time talking to the president. no far, not the first. they had exclusive interviews. but look, i'm here is the tone to which they ask questions. i wouldn't pay attention to it. tell me honestly, if we are talking about western journalists, they are quite professional, they are very professional people, the question of the goals they set with you. right there, steve, he has been working in russia for , probably, years, well, more than 10 years. yes , a veteran, what is his task and that, the media that he represents, their task was after the collapse the soviet union is telling all of us. first of all, we are not the whole world, that we have not had anything good in history, and

everything that we did. it was bad. and we should be ashamed of our grandfathers and parents who won the war and then restored the soviet union and they will continue to do the same. why do they go to minsk yes, everything is very simple lukashenko really looks at the situation and speaks the truth that. intrigue and decoys , that's why they go, as far as this atmosphere is concerned. this is not the first event where journalists of different , let's say, views of various formations are sitting in the same room, but look at the president, he managed them all. and to force people to talk like a human being about the problems that exist. this is just the same

event that showed that dialogue is possible and it is possible to agree on some so far. well , actions that no longer allow. there was no further talk, and the president very clearly and specifically formulates the thoughts that he wants to convey. it's true. this is his great experience as a politician, but it is also a signal to western society that there is real common sense. here's to this crisis and understanding. how else is it possible to get out of this crisis situation, but why is that? after all? we perfectly understand that the same person. we understood how he worked with refugees from the border. well, lied lied, frankly. i remember footage from ki. eva, when did he run from the roof there? yes, remember this wonderful video and also lied, and here he will lie. but the fact that he will be forced

to show the president’s direct speech and smart people will hear what the president said, and not what western commented on later a journalist is very important and therefore it is imperative to call and talk to these people mora sergeevich, you need to call and talk even to those. who do you know about, and it has already happened more than once, that they will still try to present information differently from how it was reported. well, i wasn't lucky enough to be present at this event, but an outsider's representative he really is. yes, you have to put it in. uh, probably fat. uh, fat plus uh, to our journalists, because i agree, uh, with andrei evgenievich. i am absolutely sure that the people who are there present they are not fools. i am absolutely sure that this is, uh, the method that they use not at such events at all, uh, with speakers that are inconvenient for them, the president is an inconvenient speaker for the west.

and this has long been known, but at the same time, he is very strong and attracts attention, so they go to him, no matter what, so they are present at these technology events. you remember this hammer hammer hammer. yes one and the same thing all the time in spite of everything and the most interesting thing is not the position of this particular journalist. they have notion of editorial policy, and they stick to that policy real unconditionally, technology technology when you're in order to level the really serious issues that they had to raise at this meeting. they tried as much as possible to get away from the really lively fluttering questions that now there is no problem. e, the zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant, which threatens the whole of europe, everything in europe what he talked about, including the bulgarian president with zelensky yes cluster munitions cluster munitions supply of long-range missiles from america and in general the threat of nuclear war, as such?

uh, because of which, in principle, or rather, only the leadership of ukraine will be to blame with the connivance of the european union and, first of all, when inciting the united states about this. we should always talk, but such platforms should be organized, firstly, in order to stop the stupidity of the westerners. the editorial was visible, because when the president speaks it is obvious. we are also spectators. yes, this is, firstly, we are fulfilling, or rather, this meeting, they perform a dual function: the first is to once again show the situation as it is and the true face of these journalists and their editors, in general , the west as such for the belarusian electorate. this also needs to be done for the second time. there were not only western journalists present there, but there were also middle eastern journalists, excuse me, ah , their audience and the demand for these media are colossal, well, they just always pretended

that there was only east and west no there is also a neighbor the east is also the far east but these are absolutely, and in many countries. yes and about it that is why such meetings are needed. and the fact that out of all the topics they chose wagner and qiao as a priority, right? between chao is not some chinese term is tactical nuclear weapons in the real chinese sense. this is what i want to emphasize. let's talk straight. these are the things that are our friends today. let's call them in quotation marks former friends. uh, europeans really care really don't care, they scare them, and they want to scare the plane with this, let us down on specific topics, which to consider during this press conference, but first i would like to ask alexei avdonin. here they talked about manuals, but alexander lukashenko does not have any manuals. he speaks openly, clearly

clearly, but sincerely and the same politicians, probably in the world now. i don't know, i can count on my fingers. this style even influences those, uh, who are ideological opponents. yes, remember the performance. that's just at the ceremony on the occasion of independence day on the thirtieth of june. the president is clear. signified that we are well, a conditionally bloody information-psychological war and, after actually holding it, here is a meeting with western journalists. he met with these ideological information-psychological fighters, who, uh, through the word yes, they are people of the word, but they hit us. yes, they are all fighters - they are officers, and the most important thing is that the president conducts with these fighters who are working against us, uh, an open conversation

in fact, forcing them, uh, to ask, yes, those questions that, on the one hand, worry western society, but worried. from what position western society only cares when the editor is worried, yes, that is, he thinks that wagner's theme should be downloaded, he gives. uh, editorial assignment for these journalists. to the fighters and they start 85 or how many percent of the whole e of this whole meeting to score only with the wagner theme, but something else is important. why do they do it? remember the classic uh, propaganda war. yes. uh, this klipman's textbook, what he said, the main task of media journalists is to form the so-called social stereotype. so this is the main task they did, they formed this stereotype that for us, for the whole society, this is the most important problem. it’s not belarus, not how belarus copes with the sanctions that the west has imposed, yes, but

wagner’s topic and uh, what will wagner do next to attack kiev to liberate? uh, yes, vilnius is making an offensive there in anticipation of it themselves or there to attack uh warsaw , you know, that is, uh, they create the picture that is beneficial to them, uh, which they don’t want to impose on a western audience, but the president destroys this stereotype im it disadvantageous, but they are forced to communicate, because the president is the primary source and primary source. he is the most important. they go asking with a face, because uncomfortable answers, how to fit them. uh, the output of this canvas is very difficult. but we emphasize once again that they are not just going, but stand in line to interview the president of belarus . well, let's talk about specific topics. and, probably, the most relevant is the deployment of tactical

nuclear weapons in belarus, the president confirmed that the warheads arrived on the territory of our country. let's let's listen its certain number of nuclear warheads moved to the territory of belarus is under reliable protection. i recently read our runaways were unable to trace. naturally, how they moved, where they moved the nuclear warheads moved. so you are not in the states, not mi-6. uh, not in germany, where it was not noticed, such was the plan, as far as control is concerned, control is provided perfectly. together by belarusians and russians, because the current composition of the armed forces cannot service nuclear weapons ourselves, because we did not have them this is a very serious thing, so we

are doing everything together with the russian federation today, we are not going to attack, the united states of america, not germany, not great britain, and so on. we are not going to attack anyone with nuclear weapons at all. this weapon is for defensive purposes only. you don't touch us and forget about nuclear weapons, but if you commit aggression against belarus , the answer will be instant. storage was ready a month ago, most of the nuclear weapons have been moved and are in belarus by the end of the year for sure. and possibly earlier. eh, it will already be in full, here it is a means of protecting

the deterrence of potential, and the enemy marat sergeevich you as a person, after all, with a military education, even your legal, in my opinion, and military legal. yes, so here i would like to emphasize a little on the other side of this issue. french journalists were present there. yes, hope were. yes, here is one of the french editions, right away, literally the next day, i mean today. come on, it came out as a headline that belarus is blackmailing, and nuclear weapons of europe. when i read this, i’ll be honest. eh, this cynicism, arrogance, lies, and such a feeling. what man did not hear the president? now we are comparing this headline with what the head of state said. yes? and this is what you need to know. imagine white as black right away yes , without even doubting it or, more precisely, maybe i doubt it, but not embarrassed by what they think of you, because we immediately come to mind, and firstly,

the wonderful poland, yes, which, without hiding , begins to say that it should enter here through the mouth of a retired general and to carry out the military without interrupting, but, nevertheless, in the context, not just through the mouth of a retired deputy minister but what the prime minister of poland, mateusz marowiecki, literally said. these days, in connection with the fact that russia intends to deploy tactical nuclear weapons in belarus, we are all the more we appeal to all of nato in order to take part in the program, nucler shirin and nato allowed poland to join this program for the joint use of nuclear weapons, moreover, such statements were made even before the decision to deploy nuclear weapons was announced, right, mariy yes never been. uh, seen in the fact that he is slow, because what russia is going to. to put it mildly, it gave its consent and, as the president said , nuclear weapons are already deployed on the territory of belarus. this is

, firstly, secondly, let's remember where cart. and where is the horse yes, exactly the plans. uh, poland eventually became the catalyst for the president, uh, the president, you stepped up this issue of deploying uh nuclear weapons, because what poland has long dreamed of is sleeping and seeing and has repeatedly stated that it needs nato nuclear weapons place on your territory. they did not hide this for several years, if they constantly talked about it, this is an important point, but on the other hand. let's talk straight. why back to the headline, belarus is blackmailing europe amazing. yes, the president clearly says, don't interfere, have mercy. god does not interfere with us for christ's sake. let us live in peace on our own. and you will never feel bad. well, the meaning is clear. yes absolutely, that is, i have. yes, i have a wonderful pistol in my pocket. don't come into my apartment. don't try, steal from me, destroy my family there and so on. you

will never know about this, and this is a very important point. let's say straight out that this is the only threat of the general's or the ant's statement. no, what you need throughout all these years, stubbornly approached and finally settled near our borders. spread out, yes, and shows us its uh, causes organs. this is the second point that poland has been declaring lately up to 300,000, an increase in the army, buying korean tanks, that korean heavy tanks are a defensive weapon. yes, bullshit. they are designed to attack 500 launchers, uh, that they buy from america poland they are also designed hummer yes they are designed to defeat. i'm on our territory they will provide should the invasion, of course. those 25% of the questions that they devoted to cha autik tactical

nuclear weapons bother them, because they now clearly understand that they will get in the teeth as soon as they poke their noses. wanted a little bit in one e part. uh, in one thought to object to sergeyevich, i looked at both the polish press and the german polish press there, a stall of political spleen, a german blood build, and you know the shock, here is the president’s statement that some of the nuclear warheads are already on the territory of belarus shock. to me it seems to be a shock, at least from people in public, maybe they don't make the final decisions based on the fact that they, as racists, consider us second class people. they still, especially public people , consider us the jungle and do not believe that our beloved may have said from the jungle, who now just quotes quotes and will leave politics the same way. the remote control is like they have in the hands of these colonialists, they are counting on sticks for arrows. at best, the bow and

arrows on the stone are cobblestones. and here from this jungle they show exactly the same colt and they say don't bother. so. this is breaking, at least in the media in the public space. just obviously, you know, there's a very important point here. here they are talking, they are discussing. they are now in vilnius at the summit will gather for them incomprehensibly. why did these lukashenka and putin take and do it in 2 months , and this action nullified all the expenses, poland’s money is drawn to this military race for us, excessive costs, what is important? this step is not symmetrical. yes, not symmetrical, he zeroed. they are a little now confused. i don't understand that in the usual way. any of their aggressive actions will be crossed, and in the determination that we

will do this when attacking the country. i do n't think they have any doubts. that's all. here it is necessary to add more, referring again to the speech of the president on june 30. remember, he then said, i signed the document that aims the acceptance center, while repeating the same at this meeting. yes, this is information that there are already specific goals. and by the way, speaking in the western press, this information appeared, that the red lines of alexander lukashenko are the red lines of alexander lukashenko, they really know the determination of this person and the image of the president with a machine gun in august of the twentieth year. well captured everything in memory. i just wanted to clarify for a minute. at some point, alexander lukashenko changed the rules of the game. by the way, even now, i think they noticed that they met in general, probably, with a decision to deploy static nuclear weapons. even here, that is, with the same dude, remember the moment when the united states of america generally went into the shadows. they decided

do not comment on it, they were afraid. yes, of course. now they are sending their messengers trying to make a sensation out of this and find a vulnerable point. but even if you look at zelensky’s opposition, how ukraine was afraid that belarus, uh, would enter yes into this conflict in ukraine, even after alexander grigoryevich called enough nits. yes zelensky although the man is incredibly touchy, he hid under the bench. i would suggest that we didn't do it myself and i'm sorry, we need to abandon the terms of accommodation. the return of russia will be talked about this differently felt. we had it and we are back. why because they weren't fulfilled with respect to us, and the budapest one, which allegedly gave some kind of obligations specifically in relation to belarus the question that it was violated was said. well, you know, today from the word they took tomorrow they literally took it, probably yesterday the day before yesterday. here

i listened, the bbc and the english version. they repeated the same thing several times that the decision to deploy nuclear weapons and the deployment of wagner had led to a state of uncertainty, and for them it is generally a state of shock because, uh, why is the state of this ansotka for them? yes, uh, here, this uncertainty is so exciting, because under all these projects, military projects are signed by large corporations, banks, they have invested in this project. e politics. eh, believe. well, they said that we will do it, we will do it in such a way that a war will begin, and there in ukraine a war will begin in belarus and you will have huge military orders. e destruction, then we will restore and that's it will notice. we will solve all economic problems, and now the state of uncertainty, because they do not know

how to plan to forecast further. they thought they were wolves rendered that now they are alex one moment uh, president it's so very ironic and very mild it 's stressed that they say. you haven't even traced the movement of nuclear weapons. that is, he, of course, had all sorts of publications, including the fugitives. we do not see, we do not notice. we can't confirm you can't, because you just can't see. it was special operation. and what else to say? he did not move on the ground. he didn’t address journalists , he addressed the very states that are used to the fact that they give permission for such things and control it completely and know everything about it, so they don’t know, uh, the president is so very soft. in my opinion, he emphasized the weakness in this matter of those who previously imagined themselves to be the rulers of the world. here is the most important point. i will be supported by e, as with a military education, that no one

has yet clearly said some kind of tactical nuclear weapon. what kind of delivery system for air or artillery, both options were both aircraft and from a gondder. they are afraid of the same. the main thing is that if this is an air plane, and not an air plane, we know that our plane has already been converted. but if there are also artillery or rocket launcher systems, then this means that , well, aircraft can be shot down, but missiles cannot be shot down within the framework of the missile defense system, and under no circumstances, even if you shoot down a plane, this is understandable, the effect will be completed in the air topic of static nuclear weapons from the news to nato not only confirmed the possibility of joining poland in the program for the joint use of nuclear weapons, but also the planning and strategy of attention since 2014 and also anti-missile are constantly adapting to this. the us in poland will be commissioned by the end of this year. it will become the second us military facility of this kind in europe, such

a decision is not made within a few weeks, obviously it was being prepared in advance even before we announced the deployment of tactical nuclear weapons with us let me let's just finish off a little. yes, as a proposal, given that this topic is very important. but we do not know for sure and no one is obliged to us. neither we nor western journalists, nor western politicians. no one is required to accurately report. what are nuclear weapons? we have already placed bombs or a nuclear head for the iskanders, yes. or something else with some speed, they are real. and most importantly, well , we definitely don’t have to scold, therefore, because everything that was possible with respect to belarus is all the international law of the president said it clearly on this meeting said that everything is clearly international law. just roughly speaking, i'm sorry of course, here's hope i want to clarify the common thread sounded on a number of topics that

were raised this is our case. we will figure it out, either ours or what concerns relations with the russian federation, there is nothing to poke your nose into here , it was, yes, absolutely, but let's move on to the topic of nato ukraine, they are related to the problems of war and peace, the president made several very important statements. they have already dispersed and become, but really sensational. uh, yes, it is clear that by july 11, when vilnius meets, the nato summit zelensky's regime wants to show something on the battlefield, but there is an opportunity to agree, alexander lukashenko said, by the autumn the situation will change and there will be completely different circumstances. but let's, let's see what the president said, just on this topic. there is a lot to say that the situation should change by autumn, and we will start talking at the negotiating table, perhaps not in september. a little later, i don’t want to give out some information here, but

europeans are already talking about it. i say again, the closest thing, it seems to me, is france not far from germany, but europe suffers the most losses from this war , not only philosophical in our house. well , the europeans are losing the most financially. and you, when the recipients are actually one country, so i don’t think that it will be powerful and strong very quickly . let no one be surprised. russia is ready for negotiations with ukraine. well, i don’t want people to die. and if tomorrow these forces grind the russians will see opportunities to attack, as i said in the south, yes, transnistria can imagine a map that then russia will sit down at the negotiating table objectively, that is, there are situations that will change and approaches will be different. yes

, of course, the european context. it is important, well , you know, here, i would like to address myself to nadezhda, why are you a citizen of ukraine, right? i don't know, it's safe to say it's not safe for the people who stay there, you keep in touch with those. who lives now under control in the zelensky regime. here are the moods there in society what people want, as western propaganda assures us. and kiev propaganda that everyone is in the mood? only now is the war a counterattack, or do people still want peace, but even when i asked my question to the president, i said that i am a ukrainian journalist of belarusian television, or a belarusian journalist of ukrainian origin, and it is important that those present understand ukraine is different ukrainians are different those ukrainians that they perceive the world through the prism of zelensky and unconditionally. my relatives live in the petrovsky region and in nikolaev people who are there they are so tired of this horror. what is

happening there, they hate the person who pushed them to this so much, therefore, total support. say, in general , it would simply be wrong in relation to the case. they go to the battlefield. they are thrown into these attacks anyway. we have already learned these names of nuts. uh, under donetsk avdeevsky marinka, total mobilization of people for this morally. i think that all the men who have the opportunity are not ready they do it financially to leave the territory of ukraine, because in fact it is already devastated in the village, and i don’t know how and what ’s in their heads and what they accept, probably those people in the offices from e, also zelensky’s team, but, probably, everyone noticed this agony and such, probably, to the ultimatums that he put before nato himself there in vilnius, yes, but let us e, please, take us, make us a senominator. let me, besides, make it so e public that she fought there with russia, of course, no one

he is not blackmailing, threatening that zelensky will not go if they are not accepted, and it is already clear that they will not be accepted or invited, that if the position of ukraine collapses, only his position collapses and the people who return from the front, of course. most of them return crippled, or do not return at all , they will ask him why all this was and therefore it was . uh, they publish information that ukraine is offered an alternative to joining nato, the former head munich security conference wolfgang and schengen put forward a proposal to strengthen the security of ukraine without the need for the country to join nato the strategy is to strengthen the war aid to kiev in response to russian shelling ischinger also proposed to give ukraine the right to take part in nato summits as a permanent guest without the right to vote aleksey so that in general it gives the main high chair, this

is called you fight, die, but, uh, to our big european happy rich family. you are not still the internet is not enough, that, not that, that there are poor relatives, but in general the servants, the servants should sit in another room. sometimes you want to serve something on the gentlemen's table. here is their e status, which is now formed e hmm for ukraine they, e, nato leadership of the alliance, they were not going to accept ukraine at all. it was such, uh, dream control methods. here they formed this dream. we will accept in the european union we will accept ah. in nato, we will give you salaries, european officers will receive salaries like german officers, but all this is an illusion, you understand, all this is complete deception is an illusion that is natural, but poor ukrainians. we were seduced, and as a result, we see

what status ukraine is in now, the ukrainian people, and the entire economy as a whole. yes, you know, the ukraine nato council will still be created. well, in principle, this does not change anything, whether the first meeting will take place on the 12th. you know absolutely right. it is possible to create eight more councils of the coalition of meaning, what is the intention of the nato generals, yes, and the politicians who stand behind them were in what to fight with russia by proxy, in this case of ukrainian lives of ukrainian citizens, as they say, and they will not refuse this, so that zelensky does not shout. no matter what ultimatums you give. they have successfully implemented this plan and will not abandon it as long as there is a resource in quantity in the necessary weapons. they set the ukrainians to continue to die for their interests. the matter is not limited. only ukraine, belarus , today released material on the

actual war plan. the barrosaki, including the germans, published the new plan. how much will deployed army corps of full-fledged divisions, that is, the infrastructure of the cold war era is actually recreated only at a new technological level, and here , of course, our uh, favorite, probably such one of the heroes of the club of editors, jose barrel, is an amazing head of european diplomacy, if you can put it that way, because it seems to me that there is no diplomacy left there. ah, but still, a talking head. yes speaking, and here is what he said to our beautiful barrel that the eu can turn the european peace fund into a defense fund of ukraine, he stressed that ukraine's military support should be long-term during the conflict and after it, the interest rate for peace is war. true, false, i wanted to go back for a second to president ashine's words. uh, i also have a lot of acquaintances that the negotiations can yes friends in ukraine remaining, uh, you know,

because ukrainian society, the long-suffering ukrainian people, is now being squeezed like a spring. and now, according to any theories, according to any practices , unclench this spring. there is already quite a bit just and it can happen in the fall. why? i say this because, well, look at the ukrainians, especially the central south eastern part of ukraine, they were deprived of their national identity and it cannot be said that many of them consider themselves russians, they were deprived of their language, they were deprived of political power by banning a huge number of parties that, at the very least, but reflected their interests. now we have reached the last, most internal, most profound, sincere. the content of the essence of a person's beliefs faiths of religion, that is, destroying the ukrainian orthodox church , these people are trying to at least for some time to leave astana in a slavish subordinate

obedient position, but i am sure that it will not work to keep this spring as compressed as possible for a long time. the same topic was also raised about the fact that the monks of kiev of the pechersk lavra can come to belarus, the noble position of the belarusian state said about this. well, by the way, the situation repeats what happened during the time of the commonwealth. when it was precisely on orthodoxy in the 16th-17th centuries that the main blow was dealt to destroy the identity of the uprising for flowers for a huge number of people. uh, feelings always turned into uprisings show through as they say yes, yes. here it is very important to emphasize a few points in let's just say zelensky and his entourage. they are alive until they fight, and they are aware of this report. this is the first thesis. i believe that he has the right to exist the second point, as regards. of what the president has said repeatedly and what is happening, at least politically, as

political animals, i approve the struggle for they lead their own lives, otherwise they can run away to their forks, which they bought at the expense of humanitarian aid. they can give examples when they avoided forks, and then did not last very long in those villas, there are different ones. there is one more point that is very important to emphasize. eh, remember, and now you can even make such a kind of comparison. yes , ukraine has been sick for 20 years. she is sick. hope i'm not perceived. this is your address. i am absolutely sure that these are relapses, like the first maidan. yes maidan ii then this here the civil war in donbass is all relapses of the disease, in fact, everything that happened. with ukraine yes, there is all the time, uh, at that time they injected such a drug. well, a little bit from the west, let's give you a little injection and you, like, get hope for joining the eu and then, once again, nato, maybe someday you will enter it's such doses

of heroin a little bit, yes, along with weapons at all training and so on, and there were real doctors who tried. well, to put it mildly , to save ukraine yes, offering medicines. it was in 1915, when the president proposed to hold the normandy format in minsk yes and to agree so that at least it was it was clear even the status of the crimea could be completely different. not to mention those territories that are now, that is, there really was a cure. and this world, about which the president is talking, now he will show it, but the thing is really different, as soon as. well, let's imagine by analogy that it was possible to talk with stalin about some kind of truce, when, let's say, they crossed the border of prussia. no, of course, in 40 there, in the fourth, in the forty-fifth years, they went to the border, there was nothing to be done. i absolutely agree that after stalingrad it was already

obvious, but the course is final. just now, on the fifth day, it was the anniversary of the start of the battle of kursk. this is the mode in the same places. yes , it also began as the kursk strategic defensive operation that is now being carried out. uh, russia, uh, in those places where battles take place. so i want to finish this thought, yes. the most interesting thing is that the parallels are colossal and german fascist tanks, with the same crosses. yes, uh, in the same places. this is generally some kind of very sad, irony, in fact, of fate, so that's it. uh, these are the peaceful initiatives that were on the part of belarus and russia. they are ignored and true. uh, the drug addict will soon die, the only question is that he has a chance, uh , there will be no chance to recover as soon as, as the president said, the whole south will sit down, and then another yes, sumy region, poltava region.

yes, and there is also the mother of russian cities, oddly enough, yes, kiev and the kiev-pechersk lavra with its russian heritage, yes, the historical one, which is now being tried forever. just throw it to the west. and it will dissolve in private collections there. and this will be a kind of payment for those unpaid loans that ukraine received. all this fits into the wording. the patient must die, and we are not talking about ukraine, we are talking about the clique that led it and which, unfortunately, led to these hundreds of thousands of victims, so far, unfortunately, ordinary people are dying, but about the chances. what marat sergeevich spoke about in the same place. further, the chances of a counter offensive, this topic was invisibly present during the press conference of this open conversation, which was conducted by the president. that's curiously not the opposite. it is clear here, we all follow the news that comes, and the reaction of the western community. and ukrainian, how can they not work,

because they wanted to ask what lukashenka is now offering specifically, guys, negotiations. there are conditions in the fall, conditions will be different from what is now on the other side. well, look, you see , the president once again emphasized that europe today is already a weak, exhausted europe . zelensky is naturally ready for negotiations. in this fire. he will be convinced that he, of course, does all his actions correctly and will fight to the last ukrainian, and the west, he simply took a position to observe the united states. yes, such an observer of money took an intermediate position. and here is this stop counter. naturally. i think, ukraine, of course, also knows how to do its own pr. she convinces them that they will succeed, perhaps to this summit they have. here, for a couple of days, they have already announced that we are changing tactics , we will no longer count by kilometers. yes , there was no such thing on the russian-speaking internet for the destruction of aspect, but in the english-speaking e there were large publications of e

nato generals and they are a well-acting acting nato generals for years, and they are in clear text. it was a young man, but they recognized that their mathematical model is a computer model the counter attack didn't work. and they are such exclamations. how did we all predict about this general millet said that on a computer one thing in life it turns out differently, and they say, why don't the russians howl according to our rules? why did they make minefields? why uh uh, they would have looked at our plans, everything was possible with us counter us stupidly, yes. it turned out there 10 minutes at the table about how dear strong thoughtful western mentality destroys one of the largest nations of europe of its own territories slavic orthodox with an alien

faith, using two things. the first thing we talked about is the internal split that led to the civil war in the donbass and the second. this is where greed is very important. elite corruption bottoms corruption. and today we are coming to the conclusion that yes, what will be the fate of zelensky. i will probably support marat sergeevich that he is needed while the fighting is going on, then his future. well , let's just say ghostly, but look what happened, you see, this is a section in ukraine between the west and east, it will no longer overgrow never, that is, about that state and about that, a single powerful fifty-fifty people with a large territory of fertile lands, access to the sea with minerals,

in the foreseeable future. it will hardly be possible to say that the europeans killed one of their major competitors, they will not reach russia, and that's today. wait. well, we see it. why don't we name things. that's how they should be called the moment, which, in my opinion, the presidential people are still to us, a western european large state. and elites. who is germany to the same france , counting on the awakening of self-consciousness in them. but deep inside i have a fear that ukrainization is underway. this one, and negative evolution is degradation. elites of western european germany , france, italy are following the example of ukraine , negative selection was discussed here, several programs back there.

elites what are europe's leaders now? compare these and which were 15 years ago. still. are you sure this appeals to the elites. he speaks directly to the nations, and therefore use this platform this opportunity, even through such. gazhirov of pro-propagandists who came from western europe and the usa to convey to the people their opinion their position their proposal lukashenka’s plan is a plan for peace, and he gives, in general, absolutely clear and understandable assessments there is no europe, it is under the feet of the usa the usa should to be held accountable for their actions until this happens, if the result is never collected and in fact the european union is on the brink of a civil war. look at everything that is happening in france, those actions which are undertaken by the president. i said bluntly, these are brainless attacks against muslims, but the transition to multipolarity will no longer stop the struggle. in ukraine, it is not for

ukraine, not for its resources. the fight is on for a new world order. let's, let's see what alexander lukashenko said. here is the order that was established after the 45th of the last century . hmm, it does not exist, this is the world order today. destroyed. we no longer live according to, uh, laws according to international rules. today we don't even live by the rules. yes indeed thanks than to the games that started. ah, the major countries of our planet. to put it very mildly, what's next? we are absolutely convinced of this that the unipolar system will disappear into oblivion , multipolarity will appear, and this process will no longer be stopped, not stopped, neither peacefully nor militarily. yes, these are the assessments of the president

of belarus, by the way, here they coincide with what serious analysts and thinkers from europe say, in particular, the director of the french institute of international and strategic relations. pascal would not have made a statement about depending on the policy of europe here is the united states europe itself must determine its own policy. they will blindly obey us policy because we have different interests we are not connected with the us yes, in many things we agree with washington, but in many others we have our own interests. our politics are very different, so i think the time when european countries had to just obey is over. this is what intellectuals say, but politicians, it seems to me, are pursuing a completely different line. there is one very important moment, a bridge can be thrown between what is happening now and in what they have already begun to say and what the president has said, yes, and that will be already

in the fall. western journalists touched on this topic a little, nadezhda, as i understand it, they tried to raise the topic, including the elections in russia in belarus, yes, but the most interesting thing they see is that they deliberately kept silent about other elections that are coming and which just stand to determine that the fact that now at the vilnius summit no decisions will be made regarding ukraine, i mean cardinal in terms of reception, and so on they designate. why does the european parliament decide that, yes, of course, ukraine must also be admitted to nato, but after its victory, when will they ever be for sure, and why all the statements that nato will fight should send troops, e.g., to the territory of ukraine for er direct clash with russia - this is an insignificant statement, determined by his secretary. yes, this is the current adviser to zelensky yes. uh, for a second on joining, just in zelensky’s european structures, so i’ll get this idea, why is this autumn

interesting, and we have parliamentary elections in poland in the fall. yes, and the peace party. uh yes, right and justice, e kachinsky. she is very upbeat. today, the second moment can lose, and the largest european country, the eu country spain, also has parliamentary elections in november december this year, but we are moving into the twenty -fourth year, and there are not only elections in russia, there are also elections in the united states, there are also elections in european parliament. in ukraine, there should be elections, as if the president. and the presidential election, yes, that is the question really them absolutely and when the president addresses the people in the european union. it is no coincidence , because what is happening now in france is already in spain already in the uk . these are such bells that in the fall, when

the absence of potash fertilizers or their lack will lead to a certain result. yes, when these prices for raw materials for gas for oil, which have grown many times for the european union, they will begin to have a deferred effect, from which they were saved, let's say, in the warm winter of extreme right-wing parties, the rating level. by the way, i would was not called by everyone extreme right. yes, those who are euro skeptics, we can sum up whatever you like. yes, the political preconditions for this are the basis for marat sergeevich absolutely saying that they will start to deal with internal affairs between supporting the authorities. it's true, but let's be realistic. just imagine, mr. zelensky comes to vilnius and they say, we accept ukraine into nato, this is exactly what to say, we declare war on russia in nuclear heat. they will say this never in their lives, so this topic can be

discussed. as many as you like, but really nobody he won’t become a westerner, especially when russia and nadezhda began to talk about the political events that are taking place in them and the french fund in fact. it's not just riots, what was happening in france now there were already clashes between on the one hand, but organized migrants, on the other hand, organized , not right, not by euro skeptics, but by real extreme rightists using weapons that they say from there here there appeared from ukraine including clients. it's perfect another level of confrontation. what background is this? the president of belarus made a corresponding statement with an assessment of the situation in the european union, but, surprisingly, we say, it seems, mind your own business. who is rosenberg? uh or who uh from the bbc said that and here is how you have, uh, political opinions. yes, there sovereignty, the president quite clearly answered him directly, uh, about

what is happening. let's look at the law. let's not judge what is really there, andrey evgenievich, listen. well, uh, here's a british journalist asking a question. whose cow mooed, but even more so the bbc is, uh, that media corporation that exists for forced fees, in fact. yes, yura is there, yes, and the tax, and the previous minister, e.g. justice, e. great britain, said that about 400,000 british subjects are condemned or fined in britain a year, or there are seized property or even prison terms for non-payment of this fee, it’s just necessary write to any bbc journalist with these questions. remember sanja. yes, it's only one such example. they are real, look france take france, after all, here's lali berte. it would seem that this myth is freedom

, beloved free france, promoted , including in honey, and what are we talking about now, and the minister of justice of france speaks in parliament. he says, let the police and parliamentarians agree to spy on citizens without a court decision and even without a prosecutor's decision, but they do the mystery, he says, and let us publicly freely spy with any element of intimidation. it's clear. well turn off the associations to be surprised at this system, because, damn it, today they are led by a democratic , unelected prime minister , who, in principle, has occupied this mountain. well, they elected with a creak, but they elected me so they elected, but 65% of the population appreciated it. e participation in these riots now, yes, how incompetent management of the entire presidency, that the first term, that, the second

from some riots, you know in russian history. the 17th century was called rebellious , so it was, in principle, not only for russia , but the macron will go down in the history of france which rebellious president he has nothing else in history , there will be nothing left of him from the point of view if the economy is easy to take, what happened and after the collapse of the soviet union after the end of the cold war hmm and europe was integrated into these euro-atlantic unification structures saying that we will be united market global market, we will rule the whole world, that is, the americans. eh, also some kind of dream for europeans. and these european corporate elites that sold everything, yes, they sold this dream and european elites, at some stage they did not political elites, corporate elites, believed the anglo-saxons. this has never been believed or conspired. no, they believed

that the anglo-saxons, despite the fact that europe was constantly at war with germany-france, they believed that they would be included in this anglo-british, well, american-british family. as a result, it turned out. that what happened is the same thing that has been happening for the last 300 years. anglo-saxons. they always survived only at the expense of europe, they destroyed it, when it’s harder for them to earn money, you can’t manage it. here is one moment, here in one france yes, about a sold dream. yes, you touched on teremok, and we somehow moved away from it by the european peace fund. yes, really, remember, this is such a good example of selling a dream. it was formed in the twenty-first year on march 22, the european council formed the european peace fund. why did he sell his dream? this fund counts with a five billion dollar budget. yes, it will ensure

the security of the european union and promote peace. and now this fund finances hostilities in ukraine beautifully, a sold dream is another source of financing for the war, which otherwise would simply not have appeared important, what i think, that's what alexei was talking about. but these technologies stop working. that's what they said pr manageability manufacturability, e we come to certain tasks. moreover, it seems to me that they came to an agreement with corporate ones, or these are precisely the same conditions, but for ordinary civil conditions. completely different. they are the same as for politics. why did this term appear? political managers are just hired by the same corporate elites, the manager is no non-state actors, and hence the macron effect, let's say a bright symbol of this new image and quality. if i may say so, e european politics, but the president says all this no longer works, guys, the new world order. and you will not dictate the rules

, and you know, i will return, i touched on this topic , and in this situation, those states that are headed not by hired political managers, but by national leaders, have advantages, because they will act in interests of the peoples, and not in the interests of any groups. uh, let's say the oligarchs, or someone else lukashenko, putin is a vuuchy, black bannererdontin. we can go on. and yes, this is how the time of responsible decisive leaders is coming, and here, uh, one of the most important questions that you notice that over the past these 30 years. nasty elites, that is, those who are kept by the owners of the banks of the owner of the companies, they did not go into politics. they understood that we should always be engaged in business. and these hired managers. let what we tell them. they they will change laws and so on, but they are faced with the most important thing. they thought they just didn't read karl marx somewhere.

they thought uh what? you can very easily manipulate the people, fool them to direct them, and with the help of such pr technologies, they will be able to continue to manage, but it turned out that no, that at some stage the people begin to see clearly and say oh, we form surplus value. yes, there is 100%, you assign ninety-nine e to yourself and we have nothing. you are one opponent. unfortunately, you can very easily all these people for 2 years. under the pretext of a species. lock them up in their apartments and not let them out on the street nadezhda smiles slyly. i know this, i just wanted to say myself that yesterday i had the opportunity to offer alexander grigorievich an idea, as he was one of the first, or rather the first. e, the person who essentially kicked out soros , didn’t even kick him out, they let everything into the country, and after that only this experience was implemented in russia, hungary, turkey, and now, in

fact, a quarrel with frit, the country. yes, this is it belarus is beautiful in beautiful, perhaps minsk will be. uh, you know, such a consolidating platform for anti-globalization forces, because it's a request. it seems to me that in many countries there is already an older one, which, let's see, gave the first victim of this social experiment to another topic. where without her, although it seemed so much was said, but nevertheless, as it was noted here, as if according to the training manual of western journalists return to her again and again , pmc wagner in belarus alexander lukashenko said that he does not see here, uh, any risks, rather the opposite, if dependence on this structure can be used by our army in the near future, the topic will be heard at a meeting between alexander lukashenko and vladimir putin, and the word is the president of belarus , i absolutely do not see any risks from the deployment of the wagner pmc in belarus if this happens. this is

not the case about which they try to strain me from all sides. i understand why they strain hmm if hmm a pmc appears in belarus, then all the neighbors, including your leadership of the united states of america, understand that this a very powerful unit, and therefore i understand why you are so treading water on this topic. uh, as for the deployment of this unit here in general, i don’t see anything special in this in seventy-five thousand armed forces of belarus, huh? how much control do i have ? and believe me, i'm in the subject, this is a very combat-ready unit, not inferior to the wagner, but the experience that the commander has the right to. hey, i've talked about this openly before. they will gladly hand over to our