on march 28, to tighten the encirclement and further comb the direction, rudobelsk, karpilovka, but partizan was not there, only a small skirmish, although according to german intelligence only in this area. there were more than 2,000 of them. there were no direct clashes with them in other areas of the luban zone. ivanovich davidovich in the swamp near lake zyslov in the twentieth of march forty-two , a detachment at the beginning of the month with a group of fighting

area intelligence reported on the plans of the germans to crack down on the partisans. this was also confirmed by the czech intermediary, who called himself yura in the operation against the partisans , the slovak corps took part, where he served and where both the czech republic and slovakia were, julius bakumel it turned out to be czech yura explained that he had worked from a working-class family since the age of 14 he was forcibly taken into the army, but he does not want to fight against the russians, bending over the map of the area. he

outlined the area of ​​possible attack. the nazis, having assessed the situation, the leadership of the detachment, it was decided to leave the place of the alleged battles and not to engage in clashes with the enemy as much as possible to withdraw the civilian population from them. liquidate october partisan zone it turned out to be successful only in relation to the civilian population. during the period of the so-called pacification action, about 80 belarusian villages were affected, 3,600 houses were burned , more than 5,000 inhabitants died.

the nazis were preparing to take special atrocities against the village of khvoinya in the petrikovsky district, where 1,419 of its inhabitants were killed. revenge for their failures at the front in the fight against the partisans. the republic had to endure even more bloody and large-scale punitive operations fascists. good early morning, belarus with svetlana borovskaya, this is a fascinating acquaintance with

unusual people. well, let's get closer to your main profession, which means that the photographs are yours. i had binoculars and it runs at me, there are all volkov that is, it turns out. mom once on a tree. no, you can't do that. for what? i just covered myself with a net, i'm sitting waiting for you to quickly draw everything. and as if thinly immediately visible. i'm so fat fat voice such a world of secrets have a good mood. this is how the birds sing - this is such music, in general, the greatest composition. behind the house, there are a lot of interesting stories immediately behind the swamp, so we have some kind of ghosts going on behind our backs. although this, maybe our little one walks half , watch on belarus 24 tv channel

. hello, after the break we are returning to the air. i welcome the guests of the program and those who are watching us now, one of the most disturbing ones, the topic has not been continued, thank god so far only informational. here are the messages at night kiev on the night of july 5 is going to attack in a couple of seconds. rinat korchak, adviser to the general director of energy atom dew, said methods according to him, there may be different high-precision weapons kamikaze drones or, for example, with radioactive projectiles, before that, let me remind you that the ukrainian media conducted a massive information campaign, whipping up hysteria around strikes on nuclear power plants, numerous reports on how

to act in case of radioactive threat. how to apply iodine and so on, moreover informi? not in the spirit of previous cipso shares, understanding this even in magathen they began to play along and support the ukrainian scenario of the russian threat. in russia itself , maria zakharova also reacted, wrote in her telegram in kiev, they installed an additional device for measuring radiation, the city authorities said. the other day , exercises began in a number of regions of ukraine in the event of an accident at the nuclear power plant, the kiev authorities are preparing to commit another terrorist attack. and now it's interesting, it turns out russia again and again says that it is not planning these absurd insane strikes on nuclear power plants, we heard what they said to russia. he tried in every possible way to withstand the european line, answering journalists' questions to say that i do not undertake to argue with zelensky, he says in an interview, but there is nothing like that, but kiev again says that they definitely have information that another

provocation will definitely hit alexander sergeyevich what is this? unfortunately, these threats and these messages cannot be underestimated. the reason is a very simple war-weariness of the world. the fatigue of the ukrainians themselves from the war did not live the discontent that is now growing in europe the fact that the standard of living in europe and the threats are growing due to the supply of weapons. and here is the escalation. they are forcing not only the kiev regime, but also those who are behind them to come up with another threat, and then carry it out in order to show, uh, this russia in such a negative way, because everything is happening. they always blamed russia for everything, they blew it up. uh, that means, uh, this one kakhovka station means russia is to blame. uh, destroy their own population. russia is to blame. now we have to blame her. the most terrible crime to somehow betray a new impetus to the war, and the americans do not care if all of europe suddenly clamps down

completely, but uh, the second part of all these threats is unconditional. informational, which leads to the same consequences in this situation, i agree with oleg sergeevich , but there is another version here, besides, uh, attracting attention. e. this is certainly a distraction from the results. counter- offensives have passed a month ukraine has lost 40% of its allocated e-technique, according to various analysts. uh, death toll and the wounded, uh, military personnel are measured in tens of thousands, so uh, it is possible that this informational noise. e, which certainly does not please us, as survivors of the chernobyl tragedy, is connected primarily with the desire to hide the attention of society and the whole world from the sad and tragic results of the contestants. well,

to save face even by blowing up a nuclear power plant of devices is a technological man-made disaster, yes. or they say that it is no less dangerous. yeah, i would have supported yuri , moreover, the latest sociological studies of the ukrainian agency. the rating confirms that 602% of the population have either close relatives or close friends who died. on the front, it's huge coverage. now, if you count, yes, the second moment we see that now the first stage of the offensive circuit has ended, as they say to the sun, and this first stage showed a complete failure, and here it cannot be ruled out that through the explosion behind the nuclear power plant and undermining. and the zaporizhzhya nuclear

power plant is not such an easy thing, because the soviet era was being built and there were protection capabilities are provided in case of a nuclear war with the west. that is, it should be some kind of special operation of some kind of special forces. prepared, who could do this in the event of an explosion for s with an appropriate wind rose, the kiev regime thinks that it will achieve those goals, that is, break up two groups so that this radioactive cloud reaches e, melitopol to berdyansk and through a man-made disaster achieve those goals, which they cannot achieve by military means. we saw it already on the example of the kokhlovskaya hydroelectric power station , which i believe that it was the entire kiev country that was blown up, because, uh, the left bank is

4 m to the right. below the right, we saw what suffered the most. they will try to do the same, and today they are preparing the population for exactly this, for such a denouement, and they will clearly blame the russian federation for this, which is not themselves. unfortunately. andrei petrovich i think that everyone is absolutely right here, that is , there can be a lot of options. and what arose in my head and in my sick imagination. at these people well, it is rather difficult to say, firstly it was correctly said. there may be just an informational distraction, but on the other hand. we can really rule out the undermining of everything we saw the north port, so the most important thing, firstly, in itself. even undermining is not undermining. the zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant will still entail a distraction of attention once a distraction of the power of means, and so on and so forth. we still didn’t really realize it was pointed out that it was right ended only the first stage of the offensive

of the ukrainian troops. and why was the kakhovskaya hydroelectric power station blown up or that in order to just blow up and create a catastrophe, it was unlikely that anyone was interested, i think that the second stage is still ahead and it is most likely that the forcing is being prepared in the kherson region and a bridgehead is already being created there and battles for bridgeheads are being waged, and the islands have already been captured by the ukrainian side, and even the kangaroo spit has already crossed over to whose side we know and see. he began to act again as a military base, that is, not all so easy and simple, and the creation of really prerequisites for undermining the zaporizhzhya can create additional difficulties for the grouping and the zaporizhzhya power plant there is a tactical story, either strategic tactical in order to solve the tasks of the so-called counteroffensive or strategic in order to make it a scorched earth on which if suddenly everything does not end the way the west and ukraine are planning, do not get it to anyone. this is a task

within the framework of a strategic operation. that is, which should contribute to her fulfillment, and in this situation, whoever can really break, he will win and receive success. although today again. we must say that the initiative belongs to ukraine , which means that ukraine very much wants some results from this itself, and the results are not yet foreseen by those who do not expect it. uh, an occasion, for example, to ask for these planes , they are asked, they made a statement yesterday, while we do not give planes. we are waiting for how the counteroffensive will develop, some result is needed, it is not there, a man-made disaster, no matter how scary it sounds. this would be the reason that would provoke strange nato to take more active actions in ukraine, up to those conversations that are already underway in certain circles, especially poland , and the introduction of some kind

of peacekeeping contingent supposedly on the territory of ukraine, uh, here is an important point . there is a feeling that the russians, but with the words of this adviser to the general director of rosenergom, and with the fact that they gave this comment late at night that there are such plans, at least frustrated, but readiness it is at night to bring ukraine there. you cannot deduct from the accounts, as the voice acting of plans always makes a certain adjustment. and uh, many of our viewers, including those who think, well, can the ukrainian side really go to such madness, excuse the war and quarrel with a neighbor with a strategic ally. e, with whom even without being in allied relations, you can have excellent economic relations. this is not insanity, but 500,000 killed and wounded, this figure, which was announced by the president in his speech, er, addressing the belarusian people and parliament.

this is not the madness of 500,000 dead iranians. and what they are going through will be a miami plane or a brother scourge, in general there are weeks, in general the radiance of independence day and there are a lot of standard hackneyed phrases about me independence i think we need to rethink the approach to this date and to the very concept of independence because very often ends with a slogan and let's move on. by the way, i've heard the speeches of so many of you speaking out. the heads of state, and there were several of them, it was on the eve and on the next day of independence, we saw and in the morning and in the evening, just from the fact that we removed everything that is superficial, we saw the essence before, remember there was a time when sovereignty was perceived as something taken for granted not only in our whole world, as if there is a country and sovereignty is included in the package, and today the process of dismantling sovereignty is underway, we can look at our closest neighbors. here, lithuania is a sovereign state, it quarrels with its nearest neighbor when it quarrels with

china well, obviously. what's the answer? ukraine, i will now give not my own words. for example hungarian prime minister orna, who in an interview with a german publication said that ukraine is no longer a sovereign state. they don't have money, they don't have weapons, they can only fight because we support them back. so, if the americans decide they want peace, it's hard to disagree here, but here at this point, when such a discussion of criticism of the state usually begins. this is not even an argument. and as an objection, and that belarus today is a sovereign state and at this moment, for some reason, they throw it in the direction of russia oleg sergeevich why is belarus a sovereign state, unlike the above listed countries? the fact is that when we have power, and first of all, the president of the country depends solely on the people, when he is completely independent, so the power is sovereign and the sovereignty of the belarusian statehood is the guarantee

of peace. here ukraine has lost its sovereignty, therefore , using the example of ukraine, we can clearly see what happens when a country loses sovereignty at the beginning, resources are taken from the country, enterprises take away economic sovereignty, then they take the land, and when there is no land, a war begins, because it is impossible to take anything else from this side, and it must be used only to make money on weapons and weaken europe and russia, the same baltic states, it does not have sovereignty. it has lost limited sovereignty it is interesting that you began listing the signs of our sovereignty with the personality of the president. that is, this is an integral factor of our sovereignty, and we must tell the truth, do not be ashamed of this today, president garant sovereignty, belarus by the way, in a few days, our patriots will celebrate the unspoken independence day on july 10 , 1994, the president won the election. and for many, this is the beginning of our sovereignty in this particular period. i would even add here to quote the classic

of one of the lawyers of political scientists, the sovereign is the one who decides emergency situations, an emergency situation always determines who is sovereign, who is not superstition. here zelensky can be called sovereign and they think, because that someone who pays there, someone orders music today comes to the point that those oligarchs who owned this ukraine push them away and say that the americans will be here. here are the british, here are the germans, here are the french, that is, capital. and who produces the mass of belaz mtz in our country. in my opinion, we produce it, and the state is not some kind of oligarch. yes, even this is the first moment, the second moment, the union state is the realization of our sovereignty, because we can freely sell the same masses of belaz mtz to convey to our consumers. we have mutual obligations, including russia , implements its sovereignty through belarus through

this synergy of the two states, because this is a strategic moscow e, the direction is the rear for the kaliningrad region. that is, when we are not talking about nominal sovereignty , it is written in the constitution of ukraine of the republic of lithuania or poland, but really all the time who makes the decision, this is a big question for me both in the seat and in dudetsky. whether they make a decision, our president asked for nuclear weapons to be provided to him. but will the ally support? ocean duduymorovets in these elections, i have a big question, and even more so they will not be given nuclear weapons, because after they lowered the germans. uh, the germans today, the main germans looking in eastern europe for the americans will be the germans in the field, according to the polish prime minister morovetsky said poland deliberately over time to convince nato partners of the need to deploy nuclear

weapons in the country, do you believe that this will happen? i want to say what is the advantage for the population, even sovereignty. here take in times of covid everyone demanded to close e, the economy to enter these curfews to go out there, that means for groceries with patolons. yes, it means general vaccination, but uh, we, as a sovereign state and the political leadership of the president, decided no, this will not happen. do you remember how we were forced to use such a strategy to liquidate the big ones. state-owned enterprises we also chose our own path. we have information uh, sovereignty and those who say that we uh are a satellite. e of the russian federation i will give such an example that russian resources information that pursued a hostile policy towards our country and people were cut off.