[000:00:00;00] there was a mistake and gorbachev was misunderstood in washington, the american president can conclude an agreement that his successor will refuse, even if there are signed documents, and in the absence of such , the corrupt clinton regime was able to declare that the agreement on not advancing nato to the borders of russia never existed, but blatant deceit after a while, not without regret. gorbachev will remember them in a conversation with german journalists. the germans very accurately complied with. all agreements were treated with great respect for our troops, but one bill. at i am there for them kohl us foreign secretary james baker and others have assured me that nato will not move an inch to the east. the americans did not fulfill this promise, and the germans showed indifference, maybe even rubbing their hands, as they say , the americans deftly tricked the russians, of course, began to make a surprised face, they say. i am not me and the hut is not mine, they did not promise anything, which means they did not

violate anything, but decisive proof. there are several lies at once, firstly, a transcript of gorbachev’s negotiations with us secretary of state james baker, when the soviet the leader emphasized that eastward expansion for the ussr is unacceptable. the head of american diplomacy told him literally the following: neither the president, nor i, nor intends to benefit unilaterally from the current processes, that is, due to the collapse of the socialist bloc, which at that time was already becoming a reality, if if we keep germany in nato , then its north atlantic treaty organization will not extend jurisdiction one inch to the east, he promised. baker gorbachev another direct evidence found in the british archives. at the national a document from 1991 was discovered in the uk archives, in which representatives of western countries declared the unacceptability of such a step. the document was discovered by a professor at boston university, joshua shifrinson. before. it was kept secret. it

was drawn up as a result of a meeting of representatives of the foreign political departments of the usa great britain france germany on march 6, 1991. we made it clear to the soviet union at the two plus four talks, as well as at other negotiations, that we did not intend to benefit from the withdrawal of soviet troops from eastern europe nato should not expand to the east. not formally, not informally. these are the words of us representative raymond seitz. from the same document. in the same place, the german representative said that the alliance would not expand beyond the oder river in connection with which they could no longer offer nato membership. the promise did not last long. in 1994 , brussels initiated entry in washington. nevnata almost everything in the soviet bloc, if the cold war ended, not with the victory of one of the parties, but with the fact that both sides laid down

weapons, and they extended the hand of friendship to each other, then all the institutions of the cold war should be canceled automatically, and by chance the soviet union will be tsentrbachev, and yakovlev and other foremen of perestroika never spoke about this a and, accordingly, when the americans and western europeans saw. ah, such light-bodiedness and with gallantry they continue. these are the notorious verbal promises, but that nato will not expand to the east. i am sure that they knowingly gave them, and knowing that they are deceiving nato became pick up in batches. sometimes seven countries at once for the next 20 years in the life of the alliance in twenty seconds of animated graphics, the military bloc will come close to the borders of russia and belarus, which is what american means not

one inch to the east. unlike gorbachev, vladimir putin was more eloquent. russia was thrown and simply deceived in a promise not to move east. the russian leader will say because now everyone can see where nato is located more, romania and the fucking baltic states how is the military contingent and infrastructure being built up there? nato price increases the number of its battle groups was, four, eight will now be. well, sort of, we can say that there is a group of 1,000 people, but this is the infrastructure that they are already standing for the fourteenth year, there for 14-15 years it is estonia latvia lithuania poland now romania slovakia bulgaria ah. hungary deployed these groups. it's not a threat. for us for all, of course, threats. moreover , the enemy is a daring question. ah, cunning

, inventive, forgetting nothing , vengeful. let's just look at the chronology belarus russia ninety-fifth ninety -sixth year heading for rapprochement referendum agreement in the ninety-seventh year against us the first sanction you showed will, march on the oprichna ninety-ninth year. all in september 1999 , the command of the multinational north-east headquarters in szczecin was created. that's where you need to reprimand that when they say, there is february 24 , 22, the enemy, or uh, claims, there is the fourteenth year, yes, it didn’t start from that against whom a lot of national command northeast was created in the baltic in in the baltic states in poland, belarus has more than 2,000 km of hostile border , poland latvia lithuania what is ukraine alone worth, where they are frankly preparing saboteurs to overthrow the government, and it’s not even just about security parameters and that european politicians have become sharply deaf and do not want to negotiate. how to talk to those who, years later

, publicly say that they blatantly deceived the order that was established after the forty-fifth last century, it does not exist this world order today, it has been destroyed. we don't live by uh, laws by international rules. today we don't even live by the rules. yes , really thanks to those games that started. ah, the major countries of our planet. to put it mildly, what awaits us is absolutely convinced that the unipolar system will disappear into oblivion, multipolarity will appear, and this process cannot be stopped. nato today is 3 million 300 thousand american soldiers, of

which more than half go further, turkey 446 thousand france 200.000 germany 188.000 in other words, from the countries of europe they made the fruit for nothing for american war games usa maximum degree of other things, their positions in europe, and today no one stutters about creating their own army, on the contrary. all. uh, let's say they swear allegiance to the nato bloc with all their might, that is, they are trying to fulfill the requirements of the united states that at least 2% of the gross national product should be spent on defense, uh, and so on and so forth. nato was created in order to join forces for collective defense. but the defensive alliance did not become american. a tool to expand its influence in the world after the second world war in 153 countries there were more than 250 military

conflicts, 80% of them the work of the united states and their henchman is not in fact in nato. there is not a single year since the founding of nato when the military bloc would not take part in an armed conflict in one place or another on the planet. the 21st century finally clarified everything and nato today is called not a guarantor of security for europe, but a guarantee of problems for its security is not a solution, but a source crises and conflicts, the alliance managed to to light up in bloody invasions on the territory of many sovereign countries. and this is a detailed list of countries where the united states and nato aggressors, bombings, invasions

, support for riots and revolutionaries, war crimes and destroyed countries, have inherited. a bloody 70-year-long run was made by scientists from the watson institute of international affairs at brown university, who calculated that as a result of the wars of the lost by the united states and its nato allies, after september 2001, 38 million displaced people appeared on the planet. and it's conservative. an estimate say researchers of the reality of such people could be 60 million, which exceeds the consequences for example of the second world war, according to the former cia analyst mcgolver west deceived russia and not the expansion of nato but the famous diplomat. george canon called this decision the most fatal of all, of course, the collective smell deceived. weak russia after the collapse of the soviet union, russia became

the successor, and in e, the country's development strategy, in principle, was being searched. uh, russia sought to integrate into the collective west, even looked for its place in nato, but it was not given such a place, and, of course, the rapid capture of the eastern european states by the entire euro-atlantic alliance was a great deception. but the white house does not hide nato - this means the united states, and today the world of beloved americans has more than a thousand military bases in more than thirty countries. for example, russia has about a dozen families in countries, if you do not take the zone. another interesting important point, because even today, when the same ukraine is covered in a huge conflict, kiev is forbidden to negotiate nato peace continues to say that they were expanding to